27
ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design: Part 2 Mark AusAn Fall Semester 2020

ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

ENCE353:AnOverviewofStructuralAnalysisandDesign:Part2

MarkAusAnFallSemester2020

Page 2: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Outline•  ObjecAvesofStructuralEngineering•  AliGlehistory•  StructuralEngineeringProcess•  Typesofloads•  Typesofstructures•  CivilEngineeringMaterials•  Loadpathsinstructures•  Howcanstructuresfail?•  Summary

Mark Austin
Page 3: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

StructuralComponents

•  Beams•  Girders•  Columns•  Floors•  FoundaAons

Column Girder

Beam

Page 4: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

LoadPath•  Floor

•  Beams

•  Girders

•  Columns

•  FoundaAon

•  Soil/Bedrock

Page 5: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

OverviewofStructuralBehaviorDepends on:

• Material properties (e.g., steel, concrete). • Structural stiffness (e.g. axial stiffness, bending stiffness) • Structural strength (e.g., ultimate member strength).

Design challenges (many tradeoffs to consider):

• If the structural stiffness is too low, then the displacements will be too large, • In dynamics applications a high structural stiffness may attract high inertia forces. • If the structural strength is too low, then the structural system may fail prematurely.

Page 6: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

EngineeringProperAesofMaterials•  Steel

–  Maximumstress:40,000–120,000lb/in2–  Maximumstrain:0.2–0.4–  ModulusofelasAcity:29,000,000lb/in2

•  Concrete–  Maximumstress:4,000–12,000lb/in2–  Maximumstrain:0.004–  ModulusofelasAcity:3,600,000–6,200,000lb/in2

•  WoodValuesdependonwoodgrade.Belowaresomesamples–  Tensionstress:1300lb/in2–  Compressionstress:1500lb/in2–  ModulusofelasAcity:1,600,000lb/in2

Page 7: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

TypesofStress-StrainBehaviorStress

Strain

E

(a) Linear Elastic

Stress

Strain (b) Non-linear Elastic

Stress

Strain (c) Elastic-plastic

Stress

Strain (d) Non-linear Plastic

Plastic strain Plastic strain

Page 8: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

EngineeringProperAesofStructuralElements•  Strength

– Abilitytowithstandagivenstresswithoutfailure•  Dependsontypeofmaterialandtypeofforce(tensionorcompression)

Tensile Failure Compressive Failure

Page 9: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

TypesofStructuralElements–BarsandCables

Bars can carry either tension or compression Cables can only carry tension

Page 10: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

TypesofStructuralElements–Beams

Tension

Compression

Loads

Page 11: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

SAffnessofDifferentStructuralShapes

Stiffest

Stiffer Stiff

Page 12: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

ProvidingStabilityforLateralLoads

Racking Failure of Pinned Frame

Braced Frame Infilled Frame Rigid Joints

Page 13: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

FailureMechanisms

Structural failure refers to loss in the load-carrying capacity of a component or member within a structure. Failure is initiated when the material is stressed to the strength limit, thus causing fracture or excessive deformations. Ultimate failure is usually associated with extreme events. The structural engineer needs to prevent loss of life by prohibiting total collapse of the structural system.

Page 14: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

FailureduetoDynamicInstabilityFailure to understand aeroelastic flutter can be catastrophic.

The Tacoma Narrows bridge opened in July 1940 and collapsed a few months later (November 1940) in a 40 mph wind. Failure completely changed the way in which suspension bridges are analyzed and designed.

Page 15: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

America’sInfrastructureCrisis

Two key problems: •  Much of America's infrastructure was built post World War II -- it's

now 50-60 years old, and being attacked by decay and neglect.

•  The US population is growing! This puts additional demands on infrastructure.

Quote from W.P. Henry, former president of ASCE: Our infrastructure is in crisis mode ... •  ... how many more people must die needlessly because we do not

take proper care of our infrastructure?

Page 16: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

PosterChild:CollapseoftheMinneapolisbridgeover135W.

The 40-year old steel deck truss crossing had been considered structurally deficient since 1990, but engineers with the Minnesota Department of Transportation had not believed the bridge to be in danger of imminent collapse. Thirteen commuters were killed and more than 100 were injured on August 1, 2007.

Page 17: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Framebuildingscanhavealsobebuiltwithconcretecolumnsandbeams(asopposedtosteel)1971SanFernandoearthquakeshowedthatmanyconcreteframeswerebriGlePotenAalforcollapseatdricsofabout0.01(lowerthanforsteelbuildings)TherearethousandsofthesebuildingsinCaliforniaandoccupantshavenotbeennoAfied

OliveViewHospitalM6.71971SanFernandoEarthquake

Failure due to lack of Ductility in Concrete Columns

Page 18: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Northridge118FWY

ExampleoffailureofabriGleconcretecolumn(pre-1975code)

Page 19: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Exampleof“ducAle”behaviorofconcretecolumns.Althoughtheparkingstructureperformedpoorly,theexteriorcolumnsdidnotfail.

Page 20: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Mexico City Earthquake, 1996

Page 21: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

YouTube Search: liquefaction

Page 22: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Failure due to liquefaction in Japan

San Francisco Earthquake, 1906

Page 23: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Sometimes you are simply in the wrong place at the wrong time ...

Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011. Richter Magnitude = 6.3

Page 24: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Failure of the Christchurch Cathedral…

Sometimes extreme events spur real innovation!

Page 25: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Update for 2016

Richter Magnitude = 7.8 – this is 32 times more energy than the 6.3 magnitude earthquake in 2011.

Page 26: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design
Page 27: ENCE 353: An Overview of Structural Analysis and Design

Summary•  StructuralEngineering:

–  IdenAfiesloadstoberesisted–  IdenAfiesalternaAvesforprovidingloadpaths(arch,truss,frame,...)

– Designsstructuretoprovidesafeandeconomicalloadpaths(material,size,connecAons)

– Tobeeconomicalandsafe,wemustbeabletopredictwhatforcesareinstructure.

Acknowledgement: University of Massachusetts Amherst .