Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

  • Upload
    djcaf

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

    1/7

    Kin K. Jim, MSc

    Matthijs C. Brouwer,

    MD, PhD

    Arie van der Ende, PhD

    Diederik van de Beek,

    MD, PhD

    Correspondence & reprint

    requests to Dr. van de Beek:

    [email protected]

    CME

    Subdural empyema in bacterial meningitis

    ABSTRACT

    Objective: To evaluate the occurrence, treatment, and outcome of subdural empyema complicat-

    ing community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults.

    Methods: Case series from a prospective nationwide cohort study from Dutch hospitals from

    2006 to 2011.

    Results: Subdural empyema was diagnosed in 28 of 1,034 episodes (2.7%), and was present on

    admission in 10 episodes and diagnosed during admission in 18. Predisposing conditions were

    present in 26 patients (93%), and consisted of otitis or sinusitis in 21 patients (75%). In all these

    patients the otitis or sinusitis spread to the subdural space. Twenty-three patients (82%) pre-

    sented with neurologic symptoms (paresis, focal seizures, dysesthesia contralateral to the empy-

    ema). Streptococcus pneumoniae was identified in 26 patients (93%) and Streptococcus

    pyogenesin 1 (3%); 1 patient had negative CSF cultures. Clinical course was frequently compli-

    cated with seizures (50%), focal neurologic abnormalities (54%), and hearing impairment (39%),

    causing an unfavorable outcome in 19 episodes (68%). Neurosurgical evacuation of the empy-

    ema was performed in 5 patients, all with considerable midline shift.

    Conclusions: Although rare, subdural empyema must be considered in patients with community-

    acquired bacterial meningitis and otitis or sinusitis, focal neurologic deficits, or epileptic seizures.

    S pneumoniaeis the predominant causative organism and neurosurgical intervention should be

    regarded as first-choice therapy in patients with empyema causing midline shift and focal neu-

    rologic abnormalities or a decreased level of consciousness. Neurology 2012;79:21332139

    GLOSSARY

    ADC 5 apparent diffusion coefficient;DWI 5 diffusion-weighted imaging;NRLBM 5 Netherlands Reference Laboratory forBacterial Meningitis.

    Bacterial meningitis is a life-threatening disease that requires immediate medical attention. The pre-

    dominant causative pathogens are Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis in adults,

    causing 80%85% of all cases, with mortality rates varying from 19% to 37% forS pneumoniae

    and 3%13% forN meningitidis.14 Community-acquired bacterial meningitis is associated with

    serious intracranial complications such as cerebral infarctions, hydrocephalus, subdural empyema, and

    cerebral abscess, which can be life-threatening and may require neurosurgical treatment.2,3,510 Sub-

    dural empyema has only been reported as an uncommon complication of community-acquired

    bacterial meningitis in adults.24,9,11,12 We investigated the occurrence, treatment, and

    outcome of subdural empyemas in adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis.

    METHODS We included adults (defined as patients older than 16 years of age) who had bacterial meningitis and were listed in the

    database of the Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (NRLBM) from March 2006 to November 2011 in a

    nationwide prospective cohort study. The NRLBM receives CSF and blood isolates from approximately 90% of all patients with

    CSF culturepositive bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands (population, 16.7 million).2,11,12 The NRLBM provided daily updates

    of the names of the hospitals where patients with bacterial meningitis had been admitted in the preceding 2 6 days and the names of

    physicians. Physicians were contacted, and informed consent was obtained from all participating patients or their legally authorized

    representatives. Physicians could also contact the investigators without report of the NRLBM for inclusion of patients. Episodes

    From the Departments of Neurology (K.K.J., M.C.B., D.v.d.B.) and Medical Microbiology (A.v.d.E.) and The Netherlands Reference Laboratory

    for Bacterial Meningitis (A.v.d.E.), Center of Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam,

    Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Study funding:Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

    Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of this article.

    2012 American Academy of Neurology 2133

    2012 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

  • 8/13/2019 Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

    2/7

    reported by physicians with negative CSF cultures could also be

    included if CSF results showed at least one individual predictor of

    bacterial meningitis (defined as a glucose level of less than 34 mg/

    dL [1.9 mmol/L], a ratio of CSF glucose to blood glucose of less

    than 0.23, a protein level of more than 220 mg/dL, or a leukocyte

    count of more than 2,000/mL)13 and the clinical presentation was

    compatible with bacterial meningitis. Patients were considered

    immunocompromised if they used immunosuppressive drugs or

    had a history of splenectomy,diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, cancer,

    or HIV infection. Patients with hospital-associated meningitis

    (defined as meningitis that occurred during hospitalization or

    within 1 week of discharge) including neurosurgery patients,

    and patients with a neurosurgical device, or neurotrauma within

    1 month of the onset of meningitis were excluded.Case-record forms were used to collect data on patient history,

    symptoms and signs on admission, clinical course, and outcome.

    Treatment information regarding antimicrobial treatment and

    (neuro)surgical interventions was collected. At discharge, all patients

    underwent neurologic examination performed by a neurologist, and

    the outcome was graded according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

    The Glasgow Outcome Scale is a well-validated instrument with

    good interobserver agreement.14 A favorable outcome was defined

    as a score of 5, and an unfavorable outcome as a score of 14.

    Patients were classified as having subdural empyema if reported

    by the treating physician and cranial imaging showed a crescent- or

    ellipse-shaped fluid collection in the subdural space. We chose to

    classify all subdural fluid collections as empyemas, as subdural effu-

    sion is a sterile fluid collection, mostly found in chronic disease.15

    The differentiation between subdural empyema and effusion is

    difficult even with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and therefore

    one can also read subdural empyema or effusion when we use

    subdural empyema.Cranial radiologic imaging was collected and

    independently re-evaluated by 2 investigators (K.K.J., M.C.B.).

    Midline shift was measured, and the volume of the empyema was

    calculated using the ABC/2 method.16 To check for underreporting

    by physicians, we evaluated 150 consecutive patients who under-

    went cranial imaging in whom subdural empyema was not reported.

    None of these patients had subdural empyema.

    The Mann-Whitney U test was used to identify differences

    between episodes with and without subdural empyema with respect

    to continuous variables, and dichotomous variables were comparedwith use of the x2 test. Pearson correlation test was used to identify

    correlations between continuous variables. All tests were 2-tailed

    and ap value ,0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses

    were performed with use of IBM SPSS Statistics, version 19.0.0.

    Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.

    The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Academic Med-

    ical Center, Amsterdam.

    RESULTSFrom March 2006 to November 2011, we

    included 1,034 patients with bacterial meningitis. A

    total of 678 (66%) episodes were caused byS pneumo-

    niae, 107 (10%) byN meningitidis, and 165 (16%) by

    other bacteria. A total of 79 patients had negative CSFcultures but at least one individual CSF marker of bac-

    terial meningitis. Subdural empyema was diagnosed in

    28 of 1,034 episodes of bacterial meningitis (2.7%)

    and in 3.1% of 916 patients in whom cranial imaging

    was performed. Subdural empyema was present on

    admission in 10 patients (38%). In the remaining

    18 patients (64%) the empyema was detected dur-

    ing hospitalization with a median time to detection

    of 5 days after admission (range 238 days).

    The mean age at diagnosis was 58 years (range,

    25

    81; table 1). Predisposing conditions for bacterial

    Table 1 Clinical and laboratory features in 28

    adult bacterial meningitis patients with

    subdural empyemasa

    Clinical characteristics Values

    Mean age, y (SD) 58 (14)

    Male 19/28 (68)

    Predisposing conditions 26/28 (93)

    Otitis or sinusitis 21/28 (75)

    Pneumonia 3/28 (11)

    Immunocompromised stateb 8/28 (29)

    Symptoms and signs on admission

    Duration of symptoms >24 h 18/28 (64)

    Headache 23/27 (85)

    Nausea 10/26 (38)

    Neck stiffness 20/28 (71)

    Seizures 2/27 (7)

    Temperature 38C 22/28 (79)

    Score on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 10 (812)

    GCS score

  • 8/13/2019 Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

    3/7

    meningitis were present in 26 of 28 patients (93%)

    and consisted of otitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, or an

    immunocompromised state. Of the patients with pre-

    disposing conditions, 21 had otitis or sinusitis (75%).

    On admission, 23 patients (82%) had an altered men-

    tal status (defined by a score on the Glasgow Coma

    Scale below 14) and 6 patients (21%) were comatose

    (Glasgow Coma Scale score,8). Focal neurologic def-

    icits were present on admission in 11 (39%) patients.

    The classic meningitis triad of neck stiffness, fever, and

    altered mental status was present in 13 patients (46%).

    Of the 10 patients diagnosed with subdural empyema

    on admission, 7 (70%) had a subacute presentation

    with symptoms for more than 24 hours. Focal neuro-

    logic abnormalities were present in 6 of these 10 patients

    (60%). Twenty-five patients (89%) presented with neu-

    rologic symptoms (paresis, focal seizures, dysesthesia) on

    the contralateral side of the empyema or effusion.

    Patients with subdural empyema were more likely to

    have predisposing conditions on admission (93% vs

    54%; p,

    0.001; table 2), especially otitis or sinusitis(75% vs 31%; p , 0.001), than patients without

    subdural empyema. Furthermore, they were more likely

    to present with a paresis on admission (25% vs 9%;

    p 5 0.007) than patients without subdural empyema.

    Lumbar puncture was performed on admission in

    all patients. At least one individual CSF finding pre-

    dictive of bacterial meningitis (a glucose level of less

    than 34 mg/dL [1.9 mmol/L], a ratio of CSF glucose

    to blood glucose of less than 0.23, a protein level of

    more than 220 mg/dL, or a leukocyte count of more

    than 2,000/mm3) was present in all patients with

    subdural empyema. Eleven patients deteriorated clin-

    ically within 8 hours of initial lumbar puncture, but

    transtentorial cerebral herniation with pupil dilation

    and abnormal posturing was not observed. The dete-

    rioration consisted of (increase in) hemiparesis in 6

    patients, respiratory failure in 4, and seizures in 4.

    Cranial imaging was repeated following deterioration

    in 10 of 11 patients and did not show radiologic signs

    of transtentorial cerebral herniation. Gram staining of

    CSF was done in 24 patients (86%) and showed pres-

    ence of bacteria in 22 patients (92%). CSF cultures

    showed S pneumoniae in 26 patients, Streptococcus

    pyogenes in 1 patient, and 1 patient had a negative

    CSF culture. The incidence of subdural empyema

    in patients with pneumococcal meningitis presenting

    with otitis or sinusitis was 17 of 224 (8%). Patients

    with subdural empyema were more likely to have

    S pneumoniaeas the causative microorganism com-

    pared to patients without empyema (93% vs 65%;p 5 0.002). Conversely, patients with pneumococcal

    meningitis are more likely to have subdural empyema

    than patients with meningitis due to another micro-

    organism (3.8% vs 0.6%, p , 0.001).

    The subdural empyema was located at the left con-

    vexity in 12 patients, right convexity in 14 patients,

    and bilateral in 2 patients (figures 1 and 2). Cranial

    imaging was available for re-evaluation in 25 of 28

    patients. The median volume of the subdural empy-

    ema was 16.7 mL (range 1.6129 mL). The subdural

    empyema caused a mass effect in 21 of 25 patients

    (84%), resulting in midline shift in 19 patients (76%).Median midline shift measured 3.0 mm (range 1.010.7

    mm), and midline shift over 4 mm occurred more often

    in patients under 60 years (p 5 0.016). The degree of

    midline shift was strongly correlated to the volume of the

    empyema (coefficient 0.533, p 5 0.02). Cranial MRI

    was performed in 7 patients and included diffusion-

    weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coeffi-

    cient (ADC) imaging in 4. On all these 4 MRIs the

    subdural fluid collection showed a DWI hyperintense

    and ADC hypointense signal (figure 2). This pattern is

    typical for subdural empyema, in contrast to subdural

    effusions, which are hypointense on DWI.17

    Other abnormalities on cranial imaging were sinus-

    itis or mastoiditis in 23 patients (82%), generalized

    cerebral edema in 8 patients (28%), and cerebral abscess

    and infarction each in 2 patients (7%). Meningioma,

    sinus thrombosis, hydrocephalus, and intracerebral

    hemorrhage were each identified in 1 patient (3%). In

    all 21 patients with mastoiditis the subdural empyema

    developed on the same side.

    Initial antimicrobial treatment consisted of a combi-

    nation of amoxicillin/penicillin and third-generation

    cephalosporins for 9 patients (32%), monotherapy

    Table 2 Clinical and laboratory features in adults with and without subdural

    empyema among 1,034 episodes of bacterial meningitisa

    Characteristic

    Episodes withsubduralempyema (n 5 28)

    Episodes withoutsubduralempyema (n 5 1,006) p Value

    Age, y, mean (SD) 58 (14) 57 (18) 0.836

    Predisposing conditions 26/28 (93) 548/1,006 (55) ,0.001

    Otitis or sinusitis 21/28 (75) 314/1,005 (31) ,0.001

    Symptoms and signs onadmission

    Headache 23/27 (85) 734/877 (84) 0.836

    Focal neurologic deficits 11/28 (39) 283/1,006 (28) 0.197

    Paresis 7/28 (25) 87/921 (9) 0.007

    Neurologic complications

    Focal neurologicabnormalities

    15/28 (54) 189/930 (20) ,0.001

    Seizures 14/28 (50) 100/1,003 (10) ,0.001

    Hearing impairment 11/28 (39) 193/840 (23) 0.045

    Causative organism

    Streptococcus pneumoniae 26/28 (93) 652/1,006 (65) 0.002

    Outcome

    Unfavorable outcome 19/28 (68) 383/1,003 (38) ,0.001

    aData are number/number evaluated (%).

    Neurology 79 November 20, 2012 2135

    2012 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

  • 8/13/2019 Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

    4/7

    penicillin or amoxicillin in 10 patients (36%), mono-

    therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin in 7

    patients (25%), and monotherapy carbapenem and a

    combination of penicillin and carbapenem each in

    1 patient (4%). All patients received microbiologically

    adequate initial antimicrobial therapy. The median

    duration of antimicrobial treatment in surviving

    patients was 17 days (range 1162). The duration

    of treatment was not associated with the size of the

    empyema, with the causative microorganism, or with

    whether neurosurgical removal of the empyema was

    performed. None of the patients had a relapse of

    symptoms after discontinuation of antimicrobial ther-

    apy. Adjunctive steroids were administered in 25 pa-

    tients (89%). Dexamethasone, given 10 mg every 6

    hours for 4 days started before or with the first dose of

    antibiotics, was given in 24 patients (86%).

    Nine patients underwent surgical treatment: cra-

    niectomy for evacuation of subdural empyema in 5

    patients, mastoidectomy in 4 patients, paracentesis

    in 3, and 1 patient required an external ventricular

    drain for treatment of a hydrocephalus. All 5 patients

    who underwent craniectomy survived, of whom 3

    had neurologic sequelae at discharge. The perfor-

    mance of craniectomy was associated with the degree

    of midline shift (p 5 0.01), but not with the volume

    of the empyema (p 5 0.41).

    Complications developed during clinical course in

    27 of 28 patients (96%; table 3). Neurologic compli-

    cations occurred in all 27 and systemic complications

    in 11. Focal neurologic abnormalities developed in 15

    patients (54%), seizures in 14 (50%), and hearing

    impairment in 11 (39%). In 10 of 11 episodes (91%)

    that were complicated by hearing impairment, otitis was

    Figure 1 CTs of empyema complicating bacterial meningitis

    Axial CT of patient with bacterial meningitis with bilateral subdural empyema (A), temporal subdural empyema (B), frontal

    subdural empyema adjacent to intracerebral abscess causing brain shift (C), and parafalcine subdural empyema (D).

    2136 Neurology 79 November 20, 2012

    2012 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

  • 8/13/2019 Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

    5/7

    diagnosed on admission. Five patients died (18%) and

    19 had an unfavorable outcome (68%; table 3). A high-

    er rate of unfavorable outcome was observed in patients

    with subdural empyema compared to patients with

    meningitis without subdural fluid collection (68% vs

    38%;p , 0.001). Thirteen of 23 survivors had neu-

    rologic sequelae on discharge (57%).

    DISCUSSION Our study shows that subdural empy-

    ema complicates 2.7% of adult cases of community-

    acquired bacterial meningitis but is associated with a

    high rate of unfavorable outcome (68%). Subdural fluid

    collection has been reported previously to occur in 1%

    3.4%.3,4,18 Important clues for the diagnosis of empyema

    were otitis or sinusitis, focal neurologic deficits, or epi-

    leptic seizures. For patients with meningitis who develop

    neurologic complications during admission, cranial

    imaging to detect subdural empyema is indicated.3,19

    MRI with DWI remains the preferred imaging modality

    for detecting subdural empyema. DWI and diffusion on

    the ADC map have proven to be valuable in evaluation

    of intracranial pyogenic processes (abscess and empy-

    ema). Furthermore, DWI can distinguish subdural

    empyema from reactive subdural effusion.17

    The incidence of subdural empyema in patients with

    pneumococcal meningitis presenting with otitis was

    high (8%). In all patients with otitis or sinusitis the bac-

    teria spread from the mastoid or sinus to the adjacent

    subdural space causing the subdural empyema. Because

    of the increased risk of empyema in patients with otitis

    or sinusitis, consultation of an ear, nose, and throat

    specialist is warranted early during clinical course in

    all patients with bacterial meningitis.

    Only a minority of patients underwent neurosurgical

    evacuation of the empyema. In our series, midline shift

    was associated with the decision to evacuate the empy-

    ema and increased shift was associated with younger

    age rather than thickness or volume of the empyema.

    Figure 2 MRIs of empyema complicating bacterial meningitis

    Axial (A) and sagittal (B) T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MRI of patients with parafalcine subdural empyema (arrows/as-

    terisks), and diffusion-weighted (C) and apparent diffusion coefficient (D)weightedMRI of a subdural empyema over theleft

    convexity (arrows).

    Neurology 79 November 20, 2012 2137

    2012 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

  • 8/13/2019 Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

    6/7

    This may well be explained by age-related cerebral atro-

    phy. In our study, all 5 patients with subdural empyema

    who underwent craniectomy survived, albeit with neu-

    rologic sequelae at discharge in 3 of them. Nevertheless,

    neurosurgical intervention should be regarded as first-

    choice therapy in patients with empyema causing

    midline shift and focal neurologic abnormalities or

    a decreased level of consciousness.

    A substantial number of patients deteriorated in

    the first 8 hours after lumbar puncture, developing

    seizures, respiratory failure, and hemiparesis contra-

    lateral to the empyema. These symptoms may be ex-

    plained by local expansion of the empyema but could

    also be the result of brain shift following the lumbar

    puncture, although no transtentorial cerebral hernia-

    tion was observed on cranial imaging. Patients with

    subdural empyema should be carefully monitored fol-

    lowing lumbar puncture, as the empyema could

    expand and cause brain shift.

    In our study, the median duration of antimicrobial

    treatment in surviving patients was only 17 days, and

    was not associated with the size of the empyema, mid-

    line shift, or whether the empyema was neurosurgi-

    cally evacuated. The optimal duration of antimicrobial

    treatment for patients with subdural empyema or effu-

    sion has not been established in trials or comparative

    studies, but general recommendations are to treat pa-

    tients with empyema for 34 weeks if an empyema

    has been evacuated, and even longer if the patient is

    conservatively treated.20 This indicates that subdural

    empyemas do not trigger Dutch physicians to prolong

    antimicrobial treatment, but also that relatively short

    courses of antibiotics do not result in microbiologic treat-

    ment failures in these patients.

    Our study has several important limitations. First,

    cranial imaging was not performed in all patients in

    the cohort and cases of subdural fluid collection

    might have been missed. This could have led to an

    underestimation of the incidence of subdural empy-

    ema or effusion. Furthermore, subdural empyemas

    that remain subclinical may go undetected, which

    may lead to an overestimation of the severity of thedisorder in our study. Asymptomatic subdural collec-

    tions may resolve without neurosurgical intervention.

    Second, culture-negative patients are underrepresented

    in our study. Negative CSF cultures occur in 11%

    30% of patients with bacterial meningitis.1,2,4 These

    patients were only included if the treating physician

    contacted the investigators, which occurred in 11% of

    the episodes.21 Third, the diagnosis subdural effusion

    or subdural empyema was classified by the treating

    physician, and therefore it is unclear if the differenti-

    ation between subdural empyema and subdural effusion

    always occurred in a similar fashion. To differentiatebetween subdural empyema and subdural effusion

    contrast-enhanced cranial imaging is necessary. Some

    patients did not undergo contrast-enhanced cranial

    imaging, and therefore the differentiation between

    empyema and effusion may not have been accurate in

    all cases.

    Although rare, subdural empyema must be consid-

    ered in patients with community-acquired bacterial

    meningitis and otitis or sinusitis, focal neurologic def-

    icits, or epileptic seizures. S pneumoniae is the pre-

    dominant causative organism and patients are at high

    risk of developing seizures and unfavorable outcome

    (68%). Therefore, early diagnosis of empyema is nec-

    essary and neurosurgical intervention should be regarded

    as first-choice therapy in patients with empyema causing

    midline shift and focal neurologic abnormalities or a

    decreased level of consciousness.

    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

    Kin K. Jim, Matthijs Brouwer, and Diederik van de Beek performed the data

    analyses and wrote the manuscript. Arie van der Ende wrote the manuscript.

    Diederik van de Beek was the principal investigator of the study and

    provided funding.

    Table 3 Complications and outcome in 28 adult

    bacterial meningitis patients with

    subdural empyemaa

    Clinical characteristics Values

    Neurologic complications 27/28 (97)

    Impairment of consciousness 19/28 (68)

    Focal neurologic deficits 15/28 (54)

    Hearing impairment 11/28 (39)

    Seizures 14/28 (50)

    Cerebrovascular complicationsb 4/28 (14)

    Cerebral abscess 2/28 (7)

    Hydrocephalus 1/28 (4)

    Systemic complications 13/28 (46)

    Pneumonia 4/28 (14)

    Respiratory failure 7/28 (25)

    Otherc 4/28 (15)

    Glasgow Outcome Scale

    1) Death 5 (17)

    2) Vegetative state 0

    3) Severe disability 1 (3)

    4) Moderate disability 13 (46)

    5) Complete recovery 9 (32)

    Neurologic sequelaed 13/28 (46)

    a Data are number/number evaluated (%).b Cerebral infarction in 2, sinus thrombosis in 1, and intra-

    cranial hemorrhage in 1.c Osteomyelitis, hyponatremia, rhabdomyolysis, and deep

    venous thrombosis of the arm each occurred in 1 patient.d Hemiparesis in 9 patients, sensory change in 7 patients,

    cognitive impairment in 6, cranial nerve palsy in 6, ataxiaand aphasia both occurred in 1 patient.

    2138 Neurology 79 November 20, 2012

    2012 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

  • 8/13/2019 Empiema Subdural Meningitis 2012

    7/7

    STUDY FUNDING

    D.v.d.B. is supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for

    Health Research and Development (ZonMw; NWO-Vidi grant 2010),

    the Academic Medical Center (AMC Fellowship 2008), and the Euro-

    pean Research Council (ERC Starting Grant 2011).

    DISCLOSURE

    The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to

    Neurology.org for full disclosures.

    Received April 23, 2012. Accepted in final form July 31, 2012.

    REFERENCES

    1. Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D. Epidemiology,

    diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial

    meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010;23:467492.

    2. van de Beek D, de Gans J, Spanjaard L, Weisfelt M,

    Reitsma JB, Vermeulen M. Clinical features and prognos-

    tic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J

    Med 2004;351:18491859.

    3. van de Beek D, de Gans J, Tunkel AR, Wijdicks EF.

    Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults. N

    Engl J Med 2006;354:4453.

    4. Durand ML, Calderwood SB, Weber DJ, et al. Acute

    bacterial meningitis in adults: a review of 493 episodes.

    N Engl J Med 1993;328:2128.

    5. Kastenbauer S, Pfister HW. Pneumococcal meningitis in

    adults: spectrum of complications and prognostic factors in

    a series of 87 cases. Brain 2003;126:10151025.

    6. Swartz MN, Dodge PR. Bacterial meningitis: a review of

    selected aspects: 1: general clinical features, special prob-

    lems and unusual meningeal reaction mimicking bacterial

    meningitis. N Engl J Med 1965;272:842848.

    7. Kasanmoentalib ES, Brouwer MC, van der Ende A, van de

    Beek D. Hydrocephalus in adults with community-acquired

    bacterial meningitis. Neurology 2010;75:918923.

    8. Jim KK, Brouwer MC, van der Ende A, van de Beek D.

    Cerebral abscesses in patients with bacterial meningitis.J Infect 2012;64:236238.

    9. Weisfelt M, de Gans J, van der Poll T, van de Beek D.

    Pneumococcal meningitis in adults: new approaches to

    management and prevention. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:

    332342.

    10. Pfister HW, Feiden W, Einhaupl KM. Spectrum of com-

    plications during bacterial meningitis in adults. Results of a

    prospective clinical study. Arch Neurol 1993;50:575581.

    11. Statistics Netherlands.Available at: http://www.cbs.nl. Ac-

    cessed June 13, 2011.

    12. van der Ende A, Spanjaard L. Bacterial meningitis in the

    Netherlands: annual report 2009. Available at: http://www.

    amc.nl/upload/teksten/medical%20microbiology/nrlbm

    %20jv/jv2009site.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2011.

    13. Spanos A, Harrell FE Jr, Durack DT. Differential diagno-

    sis of acute meningitis: an analysis of the predictive valueof initial observations. JAMA 1989;262:27002707.

    14. Jennett B, Teasdale G. Management of Head Injuries, 2nd

    ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1981.

    15. Hughes DC, Raghavan A, Mordekar SR, Griffiths PD,

    Connolly DJ. Role of imaging in the diagnosis of acute

    bacterial meningitis and its complications. Postgrad Med J

    2010;86:478485.

    16. Gebel JM, Sila CA, Sloan MA, et al. Comparison of the

    ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted volu-

    metric analysis of intraparenchymal and subdural hemato-

    mas complicating the GUSTO-1 trial. Stroke 1998;29:

    17991801.

    17. Wong AM, Zimmerman RA, Simon EM, Pollock AN,

    Bilaniuk LT. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of subdural

    empyemas in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:

    10161021.

    18. Weisfelt M, van de Beek D, Spanjaard L, Reitsma JB, de

    Gans J. Clinical features, complications, and outcome in

    adults with pneumococcal meningitis: a prospective case

    series. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:123129.

    19. Dill SR, Cobbs CG, McDonald CK. Subdural empyema:

    analysis of 32 cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:

    372386.

    20. Tunkel AR. Subdural empyema, epidural abscess and sup-

    purative intracranial thrombophlebitis. In: Mandell GL,

    Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infec-

    tious Diseases, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill LivingstoneElsevier; 2010:12791287.

    21. Brouwer MC, Heckenberg SG, de Gans J, Spanjaard L,

    Reitsma JB, van de Beek D. Nationwide implementation

    of adjunctive dexamethasone therapy for pneumococcal

    meningitis. Neurology 2010;75:15331539.

    Share Your Artistic Expressions inNeurology Visions

    AAN members are urged to submit medically or scientifically related artistic images, such as photo-graphs, photomicrographs, and paintings, to the Visionssection ofNeurology. These images are

    creative in nature, rather than the medically instructive images published in the NeuroImagessec-

    tion. The image or series of up to six images may be black and white or color and must fit into one

    published journal page. Accompanying description should be 100 words or less; the title should be a

    maximum of 96 characters including spaces and punctuation.

    Learn more atwww.aan.com/view/Visions, or upload a Visions submission at submit.neurology.org.

    Neurology 79 November 20, 2012 2139