Electrospinning Polymers 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Electrospinning Polymers 2012

    1/7

    Electrospun supramolecular polymer fibres

    D. Hermida-Merino a, M. Belal b, B.W. Greenland a, P. Woodward a, A.T. Slark c, F.J. Davis a,,G.R. Mitchell b, I.W. Hamley a, W. Hayes a

    a Department of Chemistry, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AD, UKb Department of Physics, J.J. Thomson Physical Laboratory, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AF, UKc Henkel Adhesive Technologies, 957 Buckingham Avenue, Slough, Berkshire SL1 4NL, UK

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 23 December 2011

    Received in revised form 18 April 2012

    Accepted 19 April 2012

    Available online 30 April 2012

    Keywords:

    Electrospinning

    Molecular weight

    Supramolecular

    Hydrogen bonding

    Binding constant

    Fibre

    a b s t r a c t

    The electrospinning of urethane based low molecular weight polymers differing only in the

    nature of the hydrogen bonding end-groups has been investigated. For the end-groups with

    the lowest binding constants at maximum solubility only droplets, are produced at the

    electrode; in contrast, increasing the binding constant of the end-group results in electro-

    spun fibres being produced. The properties of the fibres produced are subject to changes in

    solvent, concentration and temperature. Typical diameters for these fibres were found to

    be some 10 s oflm, rather than the sub-micron dimensions often produced in electrospin-

    ning systems. Such diameters are related to the high initial concentrations required; this

    also may influence the rate of solvent removal and preferential surface solidification which

    feature in these examples. A simple theoretical model is used to relate the association con-

    stant to the molecular weight required for fibre formation; significantly lower levels of

    association are required for higher molecular weight macromonomers compared to smal-

    ler molecular systems.2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    Electrospinning occurs when a solution of polymer is

    exposed to a region of high electric field. Typically the solu-

    tion is passed slowly through a needle such that droplets at

    the tip become charged; under these conditions, a jet is

    expelled from the droplet and then follows a chaotic,

    whip-like trajectory towards a grounded collection plate

    [1]. The technique permits the rapid formation of fibres

    with diameters typically ranging from approximately

    10lm to 10 s of nanometers. At low polymer concentra-

    tions, the high forces experienced by the jet prior to

    becoming grounded on the collection plate, result in the

    formation of undesirable discrete droplets of material,

    rather than fibres. At higher concentrations (above the

    critical entanglement limit (Ce) for the polymer), the

    polymer chains can become entangled and consequently

    are stretched and orientated whilst the solvent rapidly

    evaporates, delivering high aspect ratio fibres [2]. The

    resulting mesh of overlapping fibres frequently has useful

    properties such as high surface area and porosity, which

    has led to their investigation for a range of applications[3]

    including filtration membranes[4]and tissue scaffolds[5].

    As a consequence of the properties of nanoscale electro-

    spun polymers, detailed studies have been conducted into

    the factors which control the fibre production in order to

    enable rapid optimisation of the conditions required to

    generate materials with targeted properties. A range of fac-

    tors have been shown to influence the nature of the fibres

    produced, including voltage, solution conductivity, surface

    tension and in particular, viscosity[6]. In this regard, Long

    and co-workers [2,7,8] have shown that for a range of poly-

    mers the diameter of the fibres produced can be related to

    the ratio of the concentration of the solution used to the

    critical concentration required for entanglements via a

    power law. However, it has been shown that high molecu-

    lar weight PMMA based materials (Mw= 183,000 g mol1)

    0014-3057/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.04.015

    Corresponding author. Fax: +44 1183786331.

    E-mail address: [email protected](F.J. Davis).

    European Polymer Journal 48 (2012) 12491255

    Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

    European Polymer Journal

    j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c at e / e u r o p o l j

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.04.015mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.04.015http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00143057http://www.elsevier.com/locate/europoljhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/europoljhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00143057http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.04.015mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.04.015
  • 8/11/2019 Electrospinning Polymers 2012

    2/7

    that contain multiple complementary hydrogen bonding

    motifs produce fibres of greater diameter than predicted

    by this simple power law [8]. This is as a consequence of

    the supramolecular interactions between polymer chains

    resulting in an increase in the effective molecular weight

    of the polymer in solution. In a similar manner, Long has

    been able to electrospin lecithin molecules by virtue of

    their ability to form worm-like micelles[9]and in another

    investigation the same group showed that the formation

    of electrospun fibres by melt electrospinning could be

    favored by the introduction of complementary adenine or

    thymine hydrogen bonding units [10]. Very recently Yan

    et al. [11] have published an account of supramolecular

    polymer nanofibres produced by electrospinning of a hete-

    roditopic monomer (based on a crown ether ammonium

    salt interaction). We have followed an alternative approach

    based on a series of urethane based macromonomers with

    a range of hydrogen bonding end-groups.

    This work focuses on a series of low molecular weight

    polyurethanes (Mn< 17,000 g mol1) that have a weak (Ka

    between 1.4 and 45 M1) hydrogen-bonding motif located

    at each chain end [12]. Morphological and rheological

    studies have highlighted the role of hydrogen bonding

    and the binding constant of the end-groups in generating

    materials with properties normally observed in high

    molecular weight polymers[13,14]. In this account we re-

    port the successful electrospinning of low molecular

    weight self-assembling polyurethanes into fibres and

    investigations of the relationship between the hydrogen

    bonding strength of the end-group and the ability to pro-

    duce fibres successfully.

    2. Experimental

    Electrospinning was performed using a glass syringe

    mounted in a syringe pump fitted with a 22 gauge needle

    of length 2.5 cm and with an internal diameter of

    0.71 mm together with a flat aluminium electrode placed

    normal to the needle at distances varying from 10

    70 cm. A Glassman high voltage power supply was used

    which allowed defined voltages over the range 7.520 kV.

    Micrographs were recorded using either a FEI Quanta FEG

    600 Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope or a

    Cambridge 360 Stereoscan electron microscope in the Cen-

    tre for Advanced Microscopy at the University of Reading.

    The structures of the supramolecular polyurethanes (1

    4) used in this study are shown inTable 1, detailed syn-

    thetic procedures and characterisation have been described

    previously [13,14]. The association constants (Ka) of the

    end-groups for thesefour polymers range from 1.415 M1.

    3. Results and discussion

    Initial investigations into the possibility of electrospin-

    ning this series of supramolecular polymers (14) into fi-

    bres were conducted using THF as the solvent as a

    consequence of the high solubility of each of the polymers

    in this medium. For each sample electrospinning was per-

    formed on solutions of polymer at the maximum possible

    concentration in all cases between 40 and 47 wt.%. The

    results of these experiments are shown in Table 2. As evi-

    dent from Table 2, electrospinning supramolecular poly-

    urethanes 1 and 2, i.e., those which contained end-groups

    with the lowest binding constant, resulted in the formation

    of discrete droplets, rather than the desired fibrillar struc-

    tures. Beads are formed as a consequence of higher surface

    tension of the cylindrical jet when compared to the volume

    occupied by droplets where the polymer concentration (in

    this case 4247%) lies below the chain entanglement con-

    centration (Ce) [2]. In contrast, Samples 3 and 4 showed

    evidence of fibre formations, albeit in the case of Sample

    3, beaded fibres, which is taken as evidence that in this

    case the concentration is at the lower end of that required

    to produce fibres[2]; subsequent investigations were con-

    ducted on polyurethane 4.

    It was noted that a change in solvent from tetrahydro-

    furan to dichloromethane resulted in a change in fibre

    diameter (from 5243 lm). Although there are many fac-

    tors that influence this fibre diameter, including conductiv-

    ity and surface tension, it is viscosity which seems to play a

    major role, and on this basis it seems likely that the change

    in diameter arises as a result of viscosity differences conse-

    quent on the slight variations in binding constants of the

    polymer end-groups and the increased volatility of CH2Cl2.

    On the basis of this apparent improvement in fibre forma-

    tion, further investigations used this solvent.

    A further study of the electrospinning of supramolecular

    polymer 4 was conducted using CH2Cl2 as the solvent to

    investigate the effect that polymer concentration has on

    the structure of the resulting fibres. Table 3 summarises

    the dimensions and products of the electrospinning process

    at select concentrations from 1742 wt.%, illustrated with

    selected SEM micrographs of the products. As observed

    for conventional (non-associative) polymers, the morphol-

    ogy of the electrospun products of supramolecular polymer

    4 passes through three distinct regimes. At low concentra-

    tions (>23 wt.%), discrete droplets predominate. As the

    polymer concentration increases, beaded fibres predomi-

    nate, and finally, above 28 wt.% polymer in CH2Cl2, high

    aspect ratio fibres are formed. At 25 wt.% polymer concen-

    tration, an unexpected compacted sphere product was

    repeatedly observed. These results clearly represent beads

    that have collapsed; their appearance suggests the forma-

    tion of a skin on the surface which collapses at the elec-

    trode. At the slightly lower concentration (23%) droplets

    clearly flow sufficiently to allow the smeared structures

    shown in the figure. Thus electrospinning this system with

    differing concentrations shows many similarities to similar

    experiments for non-associative polymers[6].

    The results described above can be explained on the ba-

    sis of the equilibrium constants for the association of the

    end-groups. In the cases of polyurethanes 1 and 2 there

    is no evidence for fibre formation, in contrast polyure-

    thanes 3 and 4 produce fibres at similar concentrations.

    The four polyurethanes are essentially the same molecular

    weight in non-associated form1 since these materials are

    1 Although for macromonomer 4 the presence of hydroxyl end-groups

    allows for the possibility of further polymerization, the GPC data suggests

    that this is minimal; the small increase in the observed value is not

    necessarily significant considering the change in end-group structure, andthe synthetic procedure was designed to avoid this problem.

    1250 D. Hermida-Merino et al. / European Polymer Journal 48 (2012) 12491255

  • 8/11/2019 Electrospinning Polymers 2012

    3/7

    Table 1

    Structures and end-group binding constants of the supramolecular polymers used in this study (n 3, Mnbetween 13,800 and 17,000 g mol1).

    Supramolecular polymer Mn

    1

    15,

    2

    15,

    3

    13,

    4

    17,

  • 8/11/2019 Electrospinning Polymers 2012

    4/7

    made from the same precursor polymer; on this basis we

    might also expect these polyurethanes to possess the same

    Ce. Thus the differences arise as a result of end-groups with

    greater binding capability (for 3 and 4 Ka values are 6.9

    15 M1, respectively). Polyurethane 3 displayed a beaded

    string morphology suggesting that the polymer solution

    used was just in excess of the chain entanglement concen-

    tration Ce, whereas 4 (which has the highest binding con-

    stant) forms well-defined, high aspect ratio fibres. Thus,

    the progressive increase in binding constants from polyure-

    thanes 14 results in an increase in the apparent molecular

    weights of macromolecules in solution, pushing the system

    from below the Ceto above Cewithout a change in the initial

    polymer concentration or molecular weight. To some extent

    this result is surprising as the association constants of the

    end-groups present on these polyurethanes are lower than

    the values typically thought to have an influence on the de-

    gree of polymerisation [15]. However, we have used a

    simple model for the way in which the association equilib-

    rium constantKainfluences the molecular weight to provide

    a consistent explanation of the results and to predict the

    likely outcome of similar experiments.

    In our analysis we have used the isodesmic model as

    described by Zhao and Moore[16]. Here the number aver-

    age degree of polymerisation,n, can be related to the

    product of the equilibrium constant and the monomer con-

    centration [A] as shown in eq. (1). This product is further

    defined in terms of the initial concentration, cin, and equi-

    librium constant Ka as shown in eq. (2). On this basis it is

    possible to predict the increase in molecular weight as a

    function of the productKacin andFig. 1shows how the de-

    gree of polymerisation varies for a range of values of this

    product. As can be seen at low values ofKacin(Fig. 1inset)

    the degree of polymerisation is approximately linear. In

    fact at such low values of Kacin eqs. (1)and (2) simplify

    to eq.(3); in contrast at very high values the relationship

    approaches a simple square root function as shown eq.(4).

    < dp>n 1=1 KaA 1

    Where:

    KaA 1 1=2Kacin 1=Kacin 1=2Kacin2

    1=2 2

    On this basis ifKacin (e.g. n 1 Kacin 3

    In contrast ifKacin is large then eq. (1)reduces to:

    < dp>n Kacin1=2 4

    On this basis we can see that, although high molecular

    weight systems require less change to the molecular

    weight, there is a corresponding reduction in the molar

    concentrations for equivalent weights of material per unit

    volume of solvent considered in contrast, for lower molec-

    ular weight systems, higher concentrations are likely to be

    obtained. However this is accompanied by a reduction in

    the effectiveness of this higher concentration as the system

    moves from the model described by eq. (3) to that by

    eq.(4). Of course higher degrees of polymerisation are re-

    quired to reach molecular masses sufficient for electros-

    pinning.

    The combined effect of these factors can be seen if we

    take as a threshold for electrospinning, the situation repre-

    sented by Sample 3; i.e. a 40% w/v concentration and a va-

    lue for the molecular weight of about 15,000. Of course we

    note that this value reflects the specific conditions (such as

    voltage and tip-to-collector distance) applied here, but on

    this basis and using eqs.(1)and (2), we obtain an estimate

    of the molecular weight of 17,400. As concentrations

    Table 2

    SEM images of the electrospun products of supramolecular polymers 14 at stated concentrations. In all cases:

    concentration is in weight%, temperature 24 2 C, relative humidity 43 4%, planar electrode, working distance:

    30 cm, working voltage: 12 kV.

    Supramolecular polymer1

    (concentration: 45%)

    Supramolecular polymer2

    (concentration: 47%)

    Supramolecular polymer 3

    (concentration: 40%)

    Supramolecular polymer 4

    (concentration: 42%)

    1252 D. Hermida-Merino et al. / European Polymer Journal 48 (2012) 12491255

  • 8/11/2019 Electrospinning Polymers 2012

    5/7

    Table 3

    Products of electrospinning supramolecular polymer 4 at increasing concentration (in dichloromethane), with selected SEM

    micrographs. For all samples a planar electrode was used with a working distance of 70 cm, working voltage: 12 kV.

    Supramolecular polymer

    4 concentration (w/v)

    Morphology Electrospinning conditions

    temp (C) (Relative humidity)

    17% 18 C (46%)

    23% 24 C (53%)

    25% 24 C (42%)

    28% 16.9 lm diameter fibres 23 C (50%)

    30% 18lm diameter fibres 23 C (47%)

    34% 24lm diameter fibres 25 C (43%)

    42% 23 C (42%)

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    n

    Kacin

    1.45

    1.35

    1.25

    1.15

    1.05

    1.4

    1.3

    1.2

    1.1

    10 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

    Fig. 1. Eq.(1)plotted as a function of the product Kacin. The inset shows the variations at low values of the product in the regime described by eq. 3.

    D. Hermida-Merino et al. / European Polymer Journal 48 (2012) 12491255 1253

  • 8/11/2019 Electrospinning Polymers 2012

    6/7

    greater than 40% are likely to be difficult to handle on the

    basis of our experiences here, we can take this as a reason-

    able limit to the initial concentration. If we take 17,400 as

    the critical chain length for the entanglements required for

    effective electrospinning, we can estimate the value for the

    equilibrium constant Ka required to achieve electrospin-

    ning for materials with different molecular weights. The

    resulting values are shown inFig. 2(together with values

    taken for a 20% solution). Of course the model does not

    take account of other factors such as chain flexibility and

    solutesolvent interactions, but it clearly shows that for

    higher molecular weight systems the level of association

    required is much lower than for smaller molecule systems.

    On this basis, the threshold concentration for electrospin-

    ning of polymer 4 would be 20% w/v, which is in accord

    with the observations as shown in Table 3. We observe

    substantial levels of solvent evaporation as the spinning

    process proceeds and thus the concentration varies during

    the electrospinning jet flight. On the basis of this analysis,

    it appears that it is the initial monomer concentration and

    the association constant which determines the viability of

    the electrospinning process.

    The studies above clearly indicate hydrogen bonding

    facilitates fibre formation and the samples obtained

    showed relatively large diameters, substantially larger,

    for example, than those obtained from the associative sys-

    tem recently described by Yan et al. [11]. We ascribe this to

    the viscosity of the high concentrations used to obtain the

    data shown in Table 2, in this respect these samples resem-

    ble rather materials electrospun from the melt, where high

    viscosities lead to rather broad fibres [17]. We note the

    diameters decreased with reduced concentration as shown

    by the data inTable 3. We also note the samples described

    in by Yan et al. were prepared at a lower weight percentage

    (ca. 19 wt.%); here the combination of high concentration

    and higher molecular weight mitigate against the forma-

    tion of submicron fibres.

    The appearance of the fibres shown in Table 3suggests

    some flow as they hit the collector; we attribute this to the

    presence of residual solvent. However, this also reflects the

    high viscosity, making, for example, bending instabilities

    less effective at solvent removal. It was found that the

    diameters of the fibres could be decreased both by increas-

    ing the temperature and through the use of the more vol-

    atile solvent dichloromethane; though of course some of

    the solvent may be trapped by the formation of a surface

    film. That such films are formed is apparent from the for-

    mation of the hollow cylindrical structures; these appear

    to be spheres formed at the electrode surface which subse-

    quently collapse. By extension it may be the case that such

    a skin forms on the fibres themselves. The formation of

    surface layers has been discussed by Reneker et al. [18];

    the presence of this solidification may have significant

    influence on the final morphology of the polymer, since it

    may allow the buildup of tension at the surface, whilst

    the central core of any fibre remains free-flowing[19].

    4. Conclusions

    The results demonstrate the influence of hydrogen

    bonding interactions on the electrospinning process. This

    study revealed a correlation between the nature of the

    end-groups and the formation of fibres. Increasing the

    binding constant for the end-groups, leads to small but sig-

    nificant increases in the effective degree of polymerisation

    in the concentrated solutions. The studies suggest that

    there are a number of factors which influence the electros-

    pinning, but probably the most crucial are concentration of

    the monomers and the value of the association equilibrium

    constant Ka. However, with all other factors being equal

    electrospinning occurs much more readily in higher molec-

    ular weight systems.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to thank Henkel UK Limited

    (post-graduate studentships for PW and DHM) and EPSRC

    (EP/D07434711, EP/G026203/1 post-doctoral fellowships

    Fig. 2. Minimum equilibrium constant required to produce electrospun fibres predicted on the basis of eqs.(1) and (2)and the data for Sample 3; solid line

    40% w/v, broken line 20% w/v.

    1254 D. Hermida-Merino et al. / European Polymer Journal 48 (2012) 12491255

  • 8/11/2019 Electrospinning Polymers 2012

    7/7

    for BWG) and the University of Reading for financial sup-

    port of this research.

    References

    [1] Reneker DH, Chun I. Nanometer diameter fibres of polymers,

    produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 1996;7:21623.

    [2] McKee MG, Wilkes GL, Colby RH, Long TE. Correlations of solution

    rheology with electrospun fiber formation of linear and branched

    polyesters. Macromolecules 2004;37(5):17607.

    [3] Greiner A, Wendorff JH. Electrospinning: a fascinating method for

    the preparation of ultrathin fibres. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007;46(30):

    5670703.

    [4] Barhate RS, Ramakrishna S. Fabrication of nanofibers with

    antimicrobial functionality used as filters: protection against

    bacterial contaminants. J Membrane Sci 2007;296(12):18.

    [5] Chong EJ, Phan TT, Lim IJ, Zhang YZ, Bay BH, Ramakrishna S, et al.

    Evaluation of electrospun PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold for

    wound healing and layered dermal reconstruction. Acta

    Biomaterialia 2007;3(3):32130.

    [6] Wang C, Hsu C-H, Lin J-H. Scaling laws in electrospinning of

    polystyrene solutions. Macromolecules 2006;39(22):766272.

    [7] Gupta P, Elkins CL, Long TE, Wilkes GL. Electrospinning of linear

    homopolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate):exploring relationships

    between fiber formation, viscosity, molecular weight and

    concentration in a good solvent. Polymer 2005;46(13):4799810.

    [8] McKee MG, Elkins CL, Long TE. Electrospinning of linear and highly

    branched segmented poly(urethane urea)s. Polymer 2004;45(26):

    870515.

    [9] McKee MG, Layman JM, Cashion MP, Long TE. Phospholipid

    nonwoven electrospun membranes. Science 2006;311(5759):3535.

    [10] Huntly MT, Karikari AS, Mckee MG, Mather BD, Layman JM, Fornof

    AR, et al. Taking advantage of tailored electrostatics and

    complementary hydrogen bonding in the design of nanostructures

    for biomedical applications. Macromol Symp 2008;270:17.

    [11] Yan X, Zhou M, Chen J, Chi X, Dong S, Zhang M, et al. Supramolecular

    polymer nanofibers via electrospinning of a heteroditopic monomer.

    Chem Commun 2011;47(25):70868.

    [12] Hermida-Merino D, Slark AT, Colquhoun HM, Hayes W, Hamley IW.

    Thermo-responsive microphase separated supramolecular

    polyurethanes. Polym Chem 2010;1(8):126371.

    [13] Woodward P, Hermida-Merino D, Greenland BW, Hamley IW, LightZ, Slark AT, et al. Hydrogen bonded supramolecular elastomers:

    correlating hydrogen bonding strength with morphology and

    rheology. Macromolecules 2010;43(5):25127.

    [14] Woodward P, Clarke A, Greenland BW, Hermida-Merino D, Yates L,

    Slark AT, et al. Facile bisurethane supramolecular polymers

    containing flexible alicyclic receptor units. Soft Matter 2009;5(10):

    200010.

    [15] De Greef TFA, Smulders MMJ, Wolffs M, Schenning APHJ, Sijbesma

    RP, Meijer EW. Supramolecular polymerisation. Chem Rev

    2009;109(11):5687754.

    [16] Zhao D, Moore JS. Nucleation-elongation: a mechanism for

    cooperative supramolecular polymerisation. Org Biomol Chem

    2003;1(20):347191.

    [17] Dalton PD, Grafahrend D, Klinkhammer K, Klee D, Mller M.

    Electrospinning of polymer melts: phenomenological observations.

    Polymer 2007;48(23):682333.

    [18] Koombhongse, Liu W and D. H, Reneker J. Flat polymer ribbons andother shapes by electrospinning. Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys

    2001;39(21): 25982606.

    [19] Mohan SD, Mitchell GR, Davis FJ. Chain extension in electrospun

    polystyrene fibres: a SANS study. Soft Matter 2011;7(9):4397404.

    D. Hermida-Merino et al. / European Polymer Journal 48 (2012) 12491255 1255