31
Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approach Richard Slade Seaward Group

Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Electrical Safety in the Workplace

A Common Sense Approach

Richard Slade Seaward Group

Page 2: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Introduction

Why is electrical safety important?

What am I required to do by law?

How do I demonstrate compliance?

What do I test?

How do I test it?

How often do I test it?

Who can perform testing?

Page 3: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Perception

Page 4: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Physiological effect 50Hz AC

Generally not perceptible 0.5mA

Threshold of perception, tingling sensation 1mA

Maximum “let go” current 5mA

Painful, can’t let go 10-20mA

Severe pain, muscular contraction, difficulty breathing 30mA

Possible Ventricular Fibrillation after 3 s, death possible 0.1A

Skeletal muscle damage – death likely 1.5A

Reality

Page 5: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09p*

Year

Nu

mb

er Members of the public

Self employed

Employee

Page 6: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Non-fatal major injuries

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09p*

Year

Nu

mb

er

Self employed

Employee

Page 7: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Over 3 day injuries

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09p*

Year

Nu

mb

er

Self employed

Employee

Page 8: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Non-fatal to members of the public

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09p*

Year

Nu

mb

er

Members of the public

Page 9: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

The Health and Safety at Work Act (1974)

The Management of Health and Safety at Work

Regulations (1999)

The Provision and Use of Work Equipment

Regulations (1998)

The Electricity at Work Regulations (1989)

Relevant legislation

Page 10: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Summary of legal requirements

The Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) „ Duty of care to ensure the safety of all persons using the premises.

The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations (1999)

„ Every employer shall make suitable and sufficient assessment of: „ The risks to the health and safety of his employees, and „ The risks to the health and safety of persons in connection with the conduct by him of his

undertaking

Page 11: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Summary of legal requirements

The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (1998) „ Every employer shall ensure that work equipment is suitable for the purpose for

which it is used or provided

The Electricity at Work Regulations (1989) „ As may be necessary to prevent danger, all systems shall be maintained so as to

prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, such danger

Page 12: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Liability and accountability

The responsible person must:

•Provide a safe environment

•Demonstrate a duty of care

•Demonstrate that they have taken steps “to prevent,

so far as is reasonably practicable any danger”

*Electricity at Work Regulation (1989)

Page 13: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Popular myths

The law says we must PAT test The laws we should take steps “to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable any danger”

Every electrical appliance must be tested every year The frequency depends on the environment, user, equipment construction and equipment type

Only specialist companies can perform inspection & testing Any competent person can perform the task

Inspection & testing is purely to prevent electric shocks Inspection & testing also reduces risk of fire

Page 14: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Risk „ combination of the probability of occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm

Risk Analysis „ systematic use of available information to identify hazards and to estimate the risk

Risk Management „ systematic application of management policies, procedures and practices to the tasks of

analyzing, evaluating and controlling risk

Understanding Risk

Page 15: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Managing the Risk

“Nothing ever fails so I don’t need to do any testing” does not constitute a Risk Analysis

Risk Analysis should take into account „Environment

„The user e.g. are they likely to abuse equipment or report damage

„The equipment construction e.g. Class I or Class II

„The equipment type e.g. hand held equipment can be dropped

When the Risk has been assessed and understood, it can be managed.

Page 16: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Reducing risk

IEE Code of Practice for In-service

Inspection and Testing of Electrical

Equipment

HSE Memorandum of Guidance on the

Electricity at Work Regulations HSR25

advises that records of tests should be kept

throughout the working life of equipment

Define Frequency

of Test and

Inspection

Perform Test and

Inspection

Record Results

Maintain Records

Label Assets

Compile Asset

Register

Determine

environment, user,

construction, type

What electrical equipment is on site?

What is the risk and how is it best managed?

Page 17: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Type Test

Design

Production line

Test the build

In-service & after

repair

What is PAT testing?

Product is safe by design

Each product is safe Product remains safe

Page 18: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Who can perform testing?

A person possessing sufficient technical knowledge or experience to be capable of ensuring that injury is prevented. Technical knowledge or experience may include: adequate knowledge of electricity adequate experience of electrical work adequate understanding of the system to be worked on and practical experience of that class of

system understanding of the hazards which may arise during the work and the precautions which need to be

taken ability to recognise at all times whether it is safe for work to continue

Page 19: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Frequency of inspection and test

The environment

E.g. office, construction site, school etc

The users

Are the likely to report damage when it occurs?

The equipment construction

Class I (protective earth) or Class II (double insulated)

The equipment type

E.g. handheld, portable, IT, moveable, stationary

Page 20: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

IEE recommended intervals for combined inspection and test

Type of Premises Type of Equipment Class I Class II

Construction Sites 110V Equipment All 3months 3months

Industrial inc Commercial Kitchens

S / IT / M

P / H

12 months 6 months

12 months 6 months

Equipment used by public

S / IT

M / P / H

12 months 6 months

12 months 12 months

Schools All 12 months 48months

Hotels S / IT

M / P

H

48months 24months 12months

None None None

Offices and shops S / IT

M / P

H

48months 24months 12months

None None None None

S ‟ stationary, M ‟ moveable, P ‟ portable, H - handheld

Page 21: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

What needs to be tested?

All equipment in an installation, whether permanently connected or connected via a plug

All equipment supplied at voltages up to 1000V a.c. or 1500V d.c. including single & 3-phase supplied at 400V, 230V and 110V e.g.

Appliances Detachable mains cords

Extension leads

Multi-way adaptors Portable RCDs

Page 22: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Current through the body

Severity depends upon

Current level

Path

Duration

Page 23: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Reduce current through the body

Insulation

Eliminate the current path through the body

Protective earthing

Reduce duration

RCD, RCBO or other protective devices

Protecting against electric shock

Page 24: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Types of construction

Class I equipment

Page 25: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Types of construction

Class II equipment

Page 26: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Categories of Inspection & Testing

User checks Performed by the user Faults / suspected faults reported and logged Equipment should be removed from service

Formal Visual Inspection Performed by a competent person

Combined Inspection and Testing Performed by a competent person Inspection +Testing as necessary + Functional checks Should be recorded

Page 27: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Formal visual inspection

Enclosure

Signs of damage e.g. cracks, exposed mains parts

Mains plug

Wiring

Signs of overheating

Fuse rating

Mains cable

Signs of damage

Signed of overheating

Correct size/rating

Page 28: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Appliance testing

Carry out periodic inspection and testing

Earth continuity & insulation resistance for Class I

Insulation Resistance for Class II

Label items to indicate test status

Maintain records of inspection and testing

Page 29: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Examples of test equipment

Page 30: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Summary The law says we have a duty of care

Faulty electrical appliances can cause serious injury

Electrical faults cause fires

A program of regular maintenance is recommended

Routine inspection & testing can reduce the risk of electric shock or fires

Routine inspection and testing can demonstrate legislative compliance

Frequency of inspection and testing depends on environment, user, equipment construction and type

Inspection and testing should be performed by a competent person

Page 31: Electrical Safety in the Workplace A Common Sense Approachbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site987/Common sense...H.S.E. RIDDOR figures Fatal injuries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2001/02

Thank you for listening

Any questions……