6
 This publication is classified as objective research. Please refer to important information at the end of the report. www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com Market Economics 11 July 2011 US Daily Economic Spotlight The Proverbial Fan Julia Coronado There was virtually nothing good about the June employment report. On the one hand, after what we expect will be a growth performance of just 1.7% saar in H1 2011, which is below what we estimate to be the economy’s potential of 2.0%, it is not terribly surprising that hiring has slowed to a crawl. To the degree some of the factors weighing on growth are expected to be transitory, hiring should pick up gradually over the second half of the year. On the other hand, many of the factors restraining growth are not transitory but structural in nature, something that was in full evidence in the June report. The US economy has basically been treading water on a population- adjusted basis thus far in this recovery as strong sectors that have benefited from the more robust global economic backdrop have not provided enough momentum to overcome domestic weakness driven by structural adjustments. This is a sobering backdrop for ongoing budget discussions as fiscal austerity will only add to structural headwinds. It will also be a challenge for Chairman Bernanke to provide a coherent and reassuring message at the semi-annual monetary policy testimony before Congress this week. The data this week will provide some reassuring reminders of the coming tailwind from falling inflation as both the PPI and CPI are projected to decline in the June readings. Retail sales are also expected to register a second nominal decline in June owing to falling gas prices and auto sales. We are off to a choppy start to Q3, and the US economy remains vulnerable to adverse shocks from abroad. Chart 1: Hiring Losing Steam in Both Surveys Source: Reuters EcoWin Pro The June employment report was dismal across the board. Nonfarm payrolls were much weaker than expected at 18k, with 57k in private hiring and 39k in government job losses. The unemployment rate rose to 9.182% from 9.053% but would have risen to 9.4% had the participation rate not fallen to 64.06% from 64.22%. The participation rate dropped 0.6pp among people aged 20 to 24, in large part reflecting discouragement over job prospects. This rise in the unemployment rate also reflected that the household survey showed job losses of 445k, the weakest reading since December 2009. This performance is far worse than the recent elevation in initial jobless claims would suggest. The details of the household survey showed that while the flow of workers losing their jobs is higher than earlier in the year, the flow of new hiring by firms has also slowed noticeably, something not captured by There was virtually nothing good about the June employment report. On the one hand, after what we expect will be a growth performance of just 1.7% saar in H1 2011, which is below what we estimate to be the economy’s potential of 2.0%, it is not terribly surprising that hiring has slowed to a crawl. To the degree some of the factors weighing on growth are expected to be transitory, hiring should pick up gradually over the second half of the year. On the other hand, many of the factors restraining growth are not transitory but structural in nature, something that was in full evidence in the June report.

Ekonomika v USA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ekonomika v USA

8/6/2019 Ekonomika v USA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ekonomika-v-usa 1/6

 

This publication is classified as objective research. Please refer to important information at the end of the report.

www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com

Market Economics 11 July 2011

US Daily Economic Spotlight

The Proverbial FanJulia Coronado 

There was virtually nothing good about the June employment report. On theone hand, after what we expect will be a growth performance of just 1.7%saar in H1 2011, which is below what we estimate to be the economy’spotential of 2.0%, it is not terribly surprising that hiring has slowed to a crawl.To the degree some of the factors weighing on growth are expected to betransitory, hiring should pick up gradually over the second half of the year.On the other hand, many of the factors restraining growth are not transitorybut structural in nature, something that was in full evidence in the Junereport. The US economy has basically been treading water on a population-adjusted basis thus far in this recovery as strong sectors that have benefited

from the more robust global economic backdrop have not provided enoughmomentum to overcome domestic weakness driven by structuraladjustments.

This is a sobering backdrop for ongoing budget discussions as fiscalausterity will only add to structural headwinds. It will also be a challenge forChairman Bernanke to provide a coherent and reassuring message at thesemi-annual monetary policy testimony before Congress this week. The datathis week will provide some reassuring reminders of the coming tailwind fromfalling inflation as both the PPI and CPI are projected to decline in the Junereadings. Retail sales are also expected to register a second nominaldecline in June owing to falling gas prices and auto sales. We are off to achoppy start to Q3, and the US economy remains vulnerable to adverseshocks from abroad.

Chart 1: Hiring Losing Steam in Both Surveys

Source: Reuters EcoWin Pro 

The June employment report was dismal across the board. Nonfarm payrollswere much weaker than expected at 18k, with 57k in private hiring and 39kin government job losses. The unemployment rate rose to 9.182% from9.053% but would have risen to 9.4% had the participation rate not fallen to64.06% from 64.22%. The participation rate dropped 0.6pp among peopleaged 20 to 24, in large part reflecting discouragement over job prospects.This rise in the unemployment rate also reflected that the household surveyshowed job losses of 445k, the weakest reading since December 2009. This

performance is far worse than the recent elevation in initial jobless claimswould suggest. The details of the household survey showed that while theflow of workers losing their jobs is higher than earlier in the year, the flow ofnew hiring by firms has also slowed noticeably, something not captured by

There was virtually nothing goodabout the June employment report.On the one hand, after what weexpect will be a growthperformance of just 1.7% saar in H12011, which is below what weestimate to be the economy’spotential of 2.0%, it is not terriblysurprising that hiring has slowed toa crawl.

To the degree some of the factorsweighing on growth are expected tobe transitory, hiring should pick upgradually over the second half ofthe year.

On the other hand, many of thefactors restraining growth are nottransitory but structural in nature,something that was in full evidencein the June report.

Page 2: Ekonomika v USA

8/6/2019 Ekonomika v USA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ekonomika-v-usa 2/6

 

US Daily Economic Spotlight, 11 July 2011 2 

www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com

  jobless claims. Given the lack of optimism reflected by the decline in theparticipation rate, it appears that some of the weakness in recent monthsreflects a very poor hiring environment for younger workers in particularrather than a marked acceleration in layoffs. Rising prices have not onlytaken their toll on consumer purchasing power but also on firms’ willingnessto hire and expand.

Chart 2: Unemployment Rate Rising Despite Falling Participation

Source: Reuters EcoWin Pro 

The details at the sector level suggest a number of structural adjustments inthe economy continue to present material headwinds. The financial sectorshed 15k jobs after adding 14k a month prior, state and local governmentslet go 25k workers after a downward-revised firing of 46k a month prior, andthe construction sector shed 9k people after losing 4k the month prior.Manufacturing returned to hiring adding 6k workers after letting go 2k amonth earlier, although this is well below the pace that prevailed earlier inthe year. The leisure and hospitality sector also rebounded adding 34kworkers after firing 24k in May as foreign visitors lured by a weak dollarcontinue to boost the tourism industry. One disturbing development is thatthe private education and health care industries added no workers, the firsttime that has happened since March 2009.

Chart 3: Real Wage Growth Negative on High Inflation, Few Wage Gains

 Source: Reuters EcoWin Pro 

Education presents a particular trouble spot that is likely to get worse beforeit gets better. Private education let go 17k workers in June after a 10k loss amonth earlier and after adding an average 6k per month in the twelvemonths ending in April. Both colleges and parochial schools are responding

to continued pressure from budget shortfalls. This shrinkage in education islikely to weigh on upcoming reports. Also, public school teachers aregenerally on July-to-July contracts, so most school districts in the countryhave handed out pink slips at the end of the current school year, which will

The US economy has basicallybeen treading water on apopulation-adjusted basis thus farin this recovery as strong sectorsthat have benefited from the morerobust global economic backdrophave not provided enoughmomentum to overcome domesticweakness driven by structuraladjustments.

This is a sobering backdrop forongoing budget discussions asfiscal austerity will only add tostructural headwinds. It will also be

a challenge for Chairman Bernanketo provide a reassuring message atthe semi-annual monetary policytestimony before Congress.

Page 3: Ekonomika v USA

8/6/2019 Ekonomika v USA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ekonomika-v-usa 3/6

 

US Daily Economic Spotlight, 11 July 2011 3 

www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com

show up as job losses when the contracts expire in July. If most districts arecutting in the neighborhood of 2.5% as is estimated by the United Federationof Teachers, this could mean a loss of 250k jobs. Most of this is above andbeyond seasonal norms and so would show up as state and local job lossesin the July employment report. Health-care hiring has also slowed, andhospitals actually let go 4k workers in June, the first job loss there since Mayof last year. The loss of education and health care and steady job creating

sectors presents a risk to the H2 rebound.

Chart 4: Structurally Slow

Source: Reuters EcoWin Pro 

The June employment report highlights that the labor market, the momentumof which tends to follow GDP growth with a roughly one quarter lag, issuffering from the lackluster first half of the year. Real consumer laborincome growth has turned negative as nominal wage and salary incomegrow at only a modest pace and headline inflation surged. Falling inflation inthe months ahead will partially restore some lost purchasing power forhouseholds and should boost spending, and eventually hiring. Even if the H2pick up is realized, however, is unlikely to alter the fact that the US seems tobe stuck in a slow growth-trap in the current recovery. Theemployment/population ratio fell to 58.2% in June from 58.4%, still stucknear the lows of the cycle, and the U6 unemployment rate jumped to 16.2%from 15.8% on the spike in discouraged workers. In addition to affecting thepolicy discussions this week, this bleak employment picture will be juxtaposed against the corporate earnings season for Q2 which be kicked offwith Alcoa’s announcement Monday. The stark contrast between continuedrobust corporate profits and sagging economies in most of the industrializedworld is only intensifying. Meanwhile, the market will have to digest its firstset of Treasury auctions without the support of QE2. Buckle your seatbelts.

In addition to affecting the policydiscussions this week, this bleakemployment picture will bejuxtaposed against the corporateearnings season for Q2 which bekicked off with Alcoa’sannouncement Monday. The starkcontrast between continued robustcorporate profits and saggingeconomies in most of theindustrialized world is onlyintensifying. Meanwhile, the marketwill have to digest its first set ofTreasury auctions without thesupport of QE2. Buckle yourseatbelts.

Page 4: Ekonomika v USA

8/6/2019 Ekonomika v USA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ekonomika-v-usa 4/6

 

US Daily Economic Spotlight, 11 July 2011 4 

www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com

% Q/Q SAAR Q1 Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1) Q1(1) Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1)2009 2010 2011(1) 2012(1)

Real GDP 1.9 1.5 2.5 3.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 0.2 2.8 2.3 2.8

Consumer expenditures 2.2 0.5 2.0 3.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 0.2 2.6 2.0 2.6

Government consumption -5.8 -0.2 -0.9 -1.2 -0.9 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 0.8 1.1 -2.0 -0.7

Residential investment -2.0 3.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 18.0 -13.4 -4.6 3.7 13.4

Equip. & software investment 8.8 8.0 9.0 12.0 3.0 7.5 9.5 10.0 -4.9 16.9 9.4 7.5

Structures investment -14.8 -5.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 -26.5 -4.0 -4.2 6.5

Net exports -393 -345 -331 -336 -339 -335 -331 -323 … … … …

Final sales 0.6 2.3 2.4 3.1 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.0 -0.2 2.4 2.1 2.7

Ch. inventories (bn 2000$) 55.7 30.7 32.7 43.7 58.7 57.7 53.7 53.2 … … … …

Production Q1 Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1) Q1(1) Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1)2009 2010 2011(1) 2012(1)

Industrial output (% y/y) 5.3 4.5 3.6 3.5 3.2 3.1 3.5 4.0 -11.2 5.3 4.2 3.4

Labor Q1 Q2(1)

Q3(1)

Q4(1)

Q1(1)

Q2(1)

Q3(1)

Q4(1)

2009 2010 2011(1)

2012(1)

Employment (avg mthly chg) 166 87 115 175 200 175 175 150 -422 78 136 175

Unemployment rate (%) 8.9 9.1 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.5 8.3 9.3 9.6 9.0 8.6

Inflation Q1 Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1) Q1(1) Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1)2009 2010 2011(1) 2012(1)

CPI % y/y 2.2 3.4 3.5 3.3 2.4 1.3 1.7 2.0 -0.3 1.6 3.1 1.9

Core CPI % y/y 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.0 1.5 1.7

Core PCE % y/y 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.2

Trade & Fiscal Q1 Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1) Q1(1) Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1)2009 2010 2011(1) 2012(1)

Current account (%GDP) -0.8 -0.8 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -2.7 -3.2 -3.0 -2.6

Federal budget bal. (%GDP) (2)

-12.3 -9.1 -11.0 -9.0 -9.5 -7.2 -9.2 -8.7 -10.0 -8.9 -10.5 -8.6

Interest Rate Forecasts

Interest rates(3)

Q1 Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1) Q1(1) Q2(1) Q3(1) Q4(1)2009 2010 2011(1) 2012(1)

Fed Funds Rate (%) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.75

3-Month Rate (%) 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.45 0.75 0.90 0.90 1.15 0.25 0.30 0.45 1.15

2-Year Rate (%) 0.83 0.45 0.75 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.25 2.45 1.14 0.61 1.00 2.45

5-Year Rate (%) 2.27 1.60 2.00 2.40 2.75 3.20 3.40 3.60 2.68 2.01 2.40 3.60

10-Year Rate (%) 3.47 3.00 3.25 3.75 3.90 4.00 4.15 4.25 3.84 3.29 3.75 4.25

30-Year Rate (%) 4.51 4.20 4.40 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.64 4.34 4.80 4.80

10Yr Swap (%) 3.57 3.15 3.45 4.10 4.30 4.40 4.60 4.75 4.01 3.41 4.10 4.75

Source: BNP Paribas 

Economic ForecastsQ4/Q42011

2011

2011

2011

2012

2012

Footnotes: (1) Forecast (2) Fiscal Year (3) End Period 

Figures are year-on-year percentage changes unless otherwise indicated 

2011

Year

Year

Year

Year

2012

2011 2012

Year

2012

2012

Page 5: Ekonomika v USA

8/6/2019 Ekonomika v USA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ekonomika-v-usa 5/6

 

US Daily Economic Spotlight, 11 July 2011 5 

www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com

The Week’s Data

Economic Data Time Last BNPP (f) Consensus (f)

Tuesday

NFIB Small Business Optimism : Jun 07:30

Trade Balance : May 08:30 USD-43.7bn USD-43.7bn USD-44.2bn

FOMC Minutes  14:00

Wednesday 

Import Prices m/m : Jun 08:30 0.2% -0.7% -0.7%

Import Prices Ex-Petroleum m/m : Jun 08:30 0.4% 0.2% n/a

EIA Oil Inventories 10:30

Treasury Statement : Jun 14:00 USD-57.6bn

Thursday 

PPI (sa) m/m : Jun 08:30 0.2% -0.1% -0.2%

PPI (sa) y/y : Jun 08:30 7.0% 7.3% 7.4%

PPI Core (sa) m/m : Jun 08:30 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%

PPI Core (sa) y/y : Jun 08:30 2.1% 2.2% 2.1%Retail Sales m/m : Jun 08:30 -0.2% -0.7% 0.1%

Retail Sales Ex-Autos m/m : Jun 08:30 0.3% -0.8% 0.4%

Initial Claims 08:30 418k 435k n/a

Business Inventories : May 10:00 0.8% 0.4% 0.8%

Friday 

CPI m/m : Jun 08:30 0.2% -0.1% -0.1%

CPI y/y : Jun 08:30 3.6% 3.5% 3.7%

Core CPI m/m : Jun 08:30 0.3% 0.2% 0.2%

Core CPI y/y : Jun 08:30 1.5% 1.6% 1.6%

Empire State Survey : Jul 08:30 -7.8 1.0 4.1

Industrial Production m/m : Jun 09:15 0.1% 0.3% 0.4%

Capacity Utilisation Rate : Jun 09:15 76.7% 76.8% 77.0%

Michigan Sentiment (Prel) : Jul 09:55 71.5 72.5 72.5

Events and Speeches Time Place Subject

Day

Wednesday

Fed’s Eric Rosengren 09:10 Worcester, MA Speaks on Economic Outlook at Fed Conference

Thursday 

Fed’s Ben S. Bernanke 10:00 Washington, DC Delivers Monetary Policy Report to House

Fed’s Richard Fisher 13:20 Dallas, TX “Economic Overview: What’s Next?”Friday 

Fed’s Ben S. Bernanke 10:00 Washington, DC Delivers Monetary Policy Report to Senate

Page 6: Ekonomika v USA

8/6/2019 Ekonomika v USA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ekonomika-v-usa 6/6

 

US Daily Economic Spotlight, 11 July 2011 6 

www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com

Research Disclaimers

Important Disclosures: Please see important disclosures in the text of this report 

The information and opinions contained in this report have been obtained from, or are based on, public sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information is accurate, complete or up to date and it should not be relied upon as such. This report does notconstitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or other investment. Information and opinions contained in the report are published for the assistance of recipients, but are not to be relied upon as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by any recipient, are subject to change without notice

and not intended to provide the sole basis of any evaluation of the instruments discussed herein. Any reference to past performance should not be taken as anindication of future performance. To the fullest extent permitted by law, no BNP Paribas group company accepts any liability whatsoever (including in negligence) for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of or reliance on material contained in this report. All estimates and opinions included in this report are madeas of the date of this report. Unless otherwise indicated in this report there is no intention to update this report. BNP Paribas SA and its affiliates (collectively “BNPParibas”) may make a market in, or may, as principal or agent, buy or sell securities of any issuer or person mentioned in this report or derivatives thereon. BNPParibas may have a financial interest in any issuer or person mentioned in this report, including a long or short position in their securities and/or options, futures or other derivative instruments based thereon, or vice versa. BNP Paribas, including its officers and employees may serve or have served as an officer, director or inan advisory capacity for any person mentioned in this report. BNP Paribas may, from time to time, solicit, perform or have performed investment banking,underwriting or other services (including acting as adviser, manager, underwriter or lender) within the last 12 months for any person referred to in this report. BNPParibas may be a party to an agreement with any person relating to the production of this report. BNP Paribas, may to the extent permitted by law, have acted uponor used the information contained herein, or the research or analysis on which it was based, before its publication. BNP Paribas may receive or intend to seekcompensation for investment banking services in the next three months from or in relation to any person mentioned in this report. Any person mentioned in thisreport may have been provided with sections of this report prior to its publication in order to verify its factual accuracy.

BNP Paribas is incorporated in France with limited liability. Registered Office 16 Boulevard des Italiens, 75009 Paris. This report was produced by a BNP Paribasgroup company. This report is for the use of intended recipients and may not be reproduced (in whole or in part) or delivered or transmitted to any other personwithout the prior written consent of BNP Paribas. By accepting this document you agree to be bound by the foregoing limitations.

Certain countri es within the European Economic Area:

This report is solely prepared for professional clients. It is not intended for retail clients and should not be passed on to any such persons.

This report has been approved for publication in the United Kingdom by BNP Paribas London Branch. BNP Paribas London Branch is authorised and supervised bythe Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel and authorised and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority. Details of the extent of our authorisationand regulation by the Financial Services Authority are available from us on request.

This report has been approved for publication in France by BNP Paribas, a credit institution licensed as an investment services provider by the Autorité de ContrôlePrudentiel whose head office is 16, Boulevard des Italiens 75009 Paris, France.

This report is being distributed in Germany either by BNP Paribas London Branch or by BNP Paribas Niederlassung Frankfurt am Main, regulated by theBundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin).

United States: This report is being distributed to US persons by BNP Paribas Securities Corp., or by a subsidiary or affiliate of BNP Paribas that is not registered asa US broker-dealer to US major institutional investors only. BNP Paribas Securities Corp., a subsidiary of BNP Paribas, is a broker-dealer registered with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, the New York Stock Exchange and other principalexchanges. BNP Paribas Securities Corp. accepts responsibility for the content of a report prepared by another non-US affiliate only when distributed to US personsby BNP Paribas Securities Corp.

Japan: This report is being distributed to Japanese based firms by BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch, or by a subsidiary or affiliate of BNPParibas not registered as a financial instruments firm in Japan, to certain financial institutions defined by article 17-3, item 1 of the Financial Instruments andExchange Law Enforcement Order. BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch, a subsidiary of BNP Paribas, is a financial instruments firm registeredaccording to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan and a member of the Japan Securities Dealers Association. BNP Paribas Securities (Japan)Limited, Tokyo Branch accepts responsibility for the content of a report prepared by another non-Japan affiliate only when distributed to Japanese based firms byBNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch. Some of the foreign securities stated on this report are not disclosed according to the Financial Instrumentsand Exchange Law of Japan.

Hong Kong: This report is being distributed in Hong Kong by BNP Paribas Hong Kong Branch, a branch of BNP Paribas whose head office is in Paris, France.BNP Paribas Hong Kong Branch is regulated as a Registered Institution by Hong Kong Monetary Authority for the conduct of Advising on Securities [RegulatedActivity Type 4] under the Securities and Futures Ordinance.

© BNP Paribas (2011). All rights reserved. 

Market Economics Team

Paul Mortimer-Lee Global Head of Market Economics 44 20 7595 8551 Gizem Kara Scandinavia 44 20 7595 8783

Ken Wattret Chief Eurozone Market Economist,Germany

44 20 7595 8657 Dominique Barbet Eurozone, France 33 1 4298 1567

Luigi Speranza Head of Inflation EconomicsEurozone, Italy

44 20 7595 8322 Julia Coronado Chief Economist North America 1 212 841 2281

Eoin O’Callaghan Inflation, Switzerland, Ireland 44 20 7595 8226 Yelena Shulyatyeva US 1 212 841 2258

Bricklin Dwyer  US, Canada 1 212 471 7996