33
Educator Performance Evaluation Office of Educator Effectiveness January 31, 2013

Educator Performance Evaluation

  • Upload
    luana

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Educator Performance Evaluation. Office of Educator Effectiveness January 31, 2013. Agenda for today. Successes & challenges Resources Formative Assessments Problem Solving. Where we are today. 5,079 licensed educators 82% have goals & action steps approved - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Educator Performance Evaluation

Educator Performance Evaluation

Office of Educator Effectiveness

January 31, 2013

Page 2: Educator Performance Evaluation

Agenda for today

Successes & challenges

Resources

Formative Assessments

Problem Solving

Page 3: Educator Performance Evaluation

Where we are today

5,079 licensed educators 82% have goals & action steps approved 6,103 observations logged in EDFS 21,133 artifacts uploaded in EDFS 285 formative assessments have been started

Page 4: Educator Performance Evaluation

Nice work!90 - 100% of goals and action steps have been approved at:

Page 5: Educator Performance Evaluation

Way to go!

Every educator has received feedback through EDFS at:

Page 6: Educator Performance Evaluation

To Do List:

Approve goals & action plans ASAP

Log observations & artifacts in EDFS

Schedule & complete Formative Assessments

Page 7: Educator Performance Evaluation

We Hear You

We know the EDFS statistics do not reflect all of the work you are doing.

We know the system needs to be improved. Developers are working hard on making EDFS more reliable.

Page 8: Educator Performance Evaluation

Resources: Artifacts

Page 9: Educator Performance Evaluation

Resources: Artifacts

Page 10: Educator Performance Evaluation

Resources: Artifacts

Standard I Standard II Standard III Standard IV

• Unit plans & assessments

• Lesson plans• Data made

public to students

• Class activities/ assignments

• Data analysis• Plans for re-

teaching

• Exemplars• Rubrics• Differentiated

instructional plans & materials

• Class routines, rules, norms

• Student work samples

• Letters & emails to families

• Invitations to participate in class activities

• Progress reports

• Log of contact with families

• Family surveys

• Thoughtful self-assessment, goals, & action plans

• Reflection on participation in PD

• Reflection on leadership role

• Records of participation in team meetings

Page 11: Educator Performance Evaluation

Resources: Prescriptions

Page 12: Educator Performance Evaluation

Resources: Prescriptions

Standard I Standard II Standard III Standard IV

-Teacher X must post daily content and language objectives in student friendly language.

-Teacher X needs to create a classroom management plan that addresses and reduces the off-task behaviors that are occurring in the classroom.

- Make at least three calls home per week to the families of students in your classes to update them on their progress.  Be sure to note these calls in your Call Log

-Teacher X should be sure to submit work in a timely manner.  She should contact her supervisor in advance of deadlines if she needs extra time or support with completing any work related tasks.

Page 13: Educator Performance Evaluation

Resources: Claims

Standard I Standard II Standard III Standard IV

Page 14: Educator Performance Evaluation

Formative Assessments:The Basics

Mid-cycle, no hard deadline

Teachers should have advance notice

Ratings on each goal and standard inform an overall rating

Overall rating may lead to a change in plans

Page 15: Educator Performance Evaluation

Formative Assessments:EDFS

Can start & and save it before releasing

Info from observations & artifacts will be at the bottom of the screen

Ratings of “Needs Improvement” & “Unsatisfactory” require prescriptions

Releasing will send an email to the educator; they have 5 days to comment

Page 16: Educator Performance Evaluation

Formative Assessments:Guiding Principles

Rationales for ratings should include: Claim about performance Connection to the rubric Evidence from observations &

artifacts

Page 17: Educator Performance Evaluation

Formative Assessments:Guiding Principles

Evidence accumulates throughout the year If formative is thorough,

summative may not be very different

If formative is brief, summative should have more evidence

Page 18: Educator Performance Evaluation

Formative Assessments:Examples

Read through the ratings and rationales for Standard II in each examples.

Identify the claims in each

What similarities and differences do you notice?

Page 19: Educator Performance Evaluation

Formative Assessments:Comparing the Examples

Looking at each rationale for Standard II,

Does it include…?

o Claim about performance

o Connection to the rubric

o Evidence from observations and/or artifacts

Page 20: Educator Performance Evaluation

Pop Quiz!

Work with the people around you to check your understanding of some of the details of the evaluation process.

Page 21: Educator Performance Evaluation

Pop Quiz!

1. True2. I. Curriculum, Planning & Assessment II. Teaching All Students III. Family and Community Engagement IV. Professional Culture3. False 4. Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory5. False6. Timing & implications7. True8. False9. Progress toward… Proficiency in…

+ =

Student Learning GoalProfessional Practice Goal

I. Curriculum, Planning & AssessmentII. Teaching All StudentsIII. Family & Community EngagementIV. Professional Culture

Overall Rating

Page 22: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#10: What should I do if the Formative Assessment is extremely late?

Write and release the Formative Assessment anyway, and then complete the Summative by the plan’s end date. Accept the probability that it will be grieved by the teacher.

Page 23: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#9: What happens I give someone on a Self-Directed plan an overall rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” at the Formative Assessment?

The teacher can continue on the Self-Directed plan until the Summative Evaluation.

OR

You can end the current Self-Directed plan create a new plan. The teacher may be placed on a Directed Growth Plan or an Improvement Plan.

Page 24: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#8: If I start someone on a new plan now, how long should it last?

A new plan will require another self-assessment, new goals and a new action plan. The plan starts when the goals are approved by the evaluator.

There are 140 calendar days between today (1/31/13) and the end of the school year (6/20/13). Allowing time for creating the plan, the maximum plan length is about 130 days.

Page 25: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#7: What should I do if an educator has not uploaded any artifacts?

If no artifacts are uploaded or submitted, the evaluator can note this as evidence in the rationales of the Formative Assessment.

Your responsibility is to notify the educator of the date of the Formative Assessment. The contract says artifacts should be submitted at least 2 weeks in advance, but you may choose to accept artifacts up to the day of.

Page 26: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#6: What should I do if an educator files a grievance after a Formative Assessment?

Contact Labor Relations at 617–635 –1577. Do not change the Formative Assessment.

Page 27: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#5: What can I do to streamline the writing of a Formative Assessment?

1.Review evidence: Read through the goals, action steps, observations, and artifacts.

2.Identify ratings: Use the teacher rubric to identify the educator’s performance level in priority elements in each standard.

3.Write the rationale: Use the language of the rubric to write claims, and support them by citing specific evidence.

Page 28: Educator Performance Evaluation

#5 Streamlining the Formative continued…

You don’t need to restate evidence and feedback from observations, just refer to them.

If you don’t have multiple sources of evidence for each rationale, it’s ok – you can add more before the summative.

While it is a best practice, it is not mandatory to write a rationale for proficient ratings.

The same prescriptions may apply to multiple educators. Write “See rationale for Standard _” instead of restating information in the Statement/ Evidence of the Problem sections.

Page 29: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#4: What can I do if I release a Formative Assessment but realize something is missing?

Formative Assessments can be edited within 5 school days of being released.

If the five days have passed, changes can still be made, but the issue may be grieved.

Another option is to upload a statement about the mistake as an artifact.

Page 30: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#3: What if an educator wants to add comments to a Formative Assessment after the five day window has closed?

The teacher may type up his/her comments and send them to the principal. The principal can send them to OEE and we can upload the document as an artifact to the educator’s plan.

Page 31: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#2: What happens if someone receives an overall rating of Unsatisfactory at the end of an Improvement Plan?

Notify Labor Relations & request an “Intent to dismiss” letter

Compile all written correspondences with the educator related to performance evaluation & submit them to OEE

Meet with the educator to discuss the evaluation. Let him/her know that you are requesting the ‘Intent to dismiss’ letter.

Page 32: Educator Performance Evaluation

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions

#1: Do I have to do this twice every year for every teacher?

No. All of the information from the Formative will filter into the Summative. If you complete a thorough Formative Assessment, your Summative Evaluation may not need many changes or additions.

Page 33: Educator Performance Evaluation

Support: Office of Educator Effectiveness

Ross Wilson, Assistant Superintendent for Educator Effectiveness ([email protected])

Jared Joiner, Implementation Specialist (jjoiner) Emily Kalejs Qazilbash, Implementation Specialist

(eqazilbash) Angela Rubenstein, Implementation Specialist

(arubenstein) Kris Taylor, Implementation Specialist (ktaylor2) Jenna Costin, EDFS On-line System Coordinator

(jcostin) Chason Ishino, Consultant (cishino)