Upload
faustus-marlas
View
19
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Economic Issues on Campus: Where Do We Go from Here?. CUPA-HR Economic Issues Task Force Spring 2011. CUPA-HR Economic Issues Task Force. Lynn BynumAmy King Mark Caldron Kelly Jones Ricardo CoronadoKay McFarlin Deborah FillmoreKen Tagawa. Task Force Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Economic Issues on Campus:Where Do We Go from Here?
CUPA-HR Economic Issues Task ForceSpring 2011
CUPA-HR Economic Issues Task Force• Lynn Bynum Amy King• Mark Caldron Kelly Jones• Ricardo Coronado Kay McFarlin• Deborah Fillmore Ken Tagawa
Task Force Conclusions
• The economic issues facing higher education are far from over – extending beyond 2014
• Financial outlook for public institutions is more negative than for private institutions
• The traditional higher education model is unsustainable
• Employees at public and private institutions remain engaged – at least for now
Do you believe the worst financial/budget issues for your institution are over?
A. B.
0%0%
A. YesB. No
10
If no, when do you expect these issues to end?
A. B. C. D.
0% 0%0%0%
A. 2011B. 2012C. 2013D. 2014 and
beyond
:10
The Bad News
• Over two-thirds of all colleges do not believe the worst of the financial crisis is over
• Slightly more than half believe the financial crisis will not end until 2014 or later
Strategies for Loss of Stimulus Funds
Top 3 Strategies:• Budget cuts/improved efficiencies• Increased revenues (tuition, fees, donors)• Reassessment/consolidation of academic
programs
What was your institution’s budget cut for FY2011-12?
A. B. C. D.
0% 0%0%0%
A. 0%
B. 1-4%
C. 5-10%
D. > 10%
10Seconds
Remaining
Budget Cuts During 2011-12
Budget Cut Impact on HR
• 16% - Zero cuts to HR budget• 48% - 1% to 5% cut to HR Budget• 23% - >5% and up to 10% cut to HR budget• 13% - 10% or greater cut to the HR budget
Top 10 Institutional Strategies to Help with Budget Cuts
1. Delayed Hiring (78%)2. Wage Freeze (71.4%)3. Increased Student Enrollment (50.5%)4. Programs Consolidated/Reorganized (40.7%)5. Voluntary Separation Program (23.1%)6. Involuntary Separation Program (23.1%)7. Reduced Benefits (18.7%)8. Unpaid Furloughs (13.2%)9. Reduced Percent of Time of Appointments (7.7%)10. Various non-specific (23.1%)
Top 10 HR Functions Cut 1. Employment 28.9% 2. Benefits 26.7% 3. Training 26.5% 4. Recruitment/Selection 24.4% 5.Classification/Compensation 21.5% 6. Payroll 15.4% 7. Academic Personnel 12.6% 8. HRIS 6.3% 9. Employee/Labor Relations 4.4% 10. Diversity/EEO 3.4%
The Good News36% of Institutions Reported Planning Salary
Increase
44% of Institutions Not Decided or Don’t Know
Only 20% of Institutions Not Planning Salary Increase
The Good News Of Those Institutions Reported Planning a Salary
Increase (by Affiliation)
• Private for-Profit 60% • Private Independent 46% • Private Religious 59% • Public 20%
Percent of Salary Increase Planned
• 1% to 2% Increase 14% of Institutions• 2% to 3% Increase 31% of Institutions• 3% to 4% Increase 41% of Institutions• 4% to 5% Increase 14% of Institutions
The Good NewsMedian Base Salary Increasefrom 2009-10 to 2010-11*
Difficulty in Filling Positions and Retaining Employees
• 85% Reported No Difficulty in Filling Positions
• 87% Reported No Difficulty in Retaining Employees
How would you rate employee engagement?
A. B. C. D. E.
0% 0% 0%0%0%
A. Very engagedB. EngagedC. RoutineD. Disengaged E. Very disengaged
Employee Engagement & Outlook
Engagement• Faculty – 94% engaged or routine • Staff – 92% engaged or routine
Outlook• Faculty – 58% cautious 28% optimistic• Staff – 60% cautious 14% optimistic
Three Top Effective Strategies Used to Communicate Information
1. Face-to-Face Meetings 36%2. Presidential Communications 25%3. Electronic 18%
--includes e-mail, website, social media
The Good News – HR Functions Expanded
1. Academic Personnel 22.6%2. HRIS 21.3%3. Training 14.8%4. Employment 13.9%5. Classification/ Compensation 11.7%6. Benefits 11.5%7. Selection/Recruitment 11.3%8. Payroll 10.5%9. Diversity/EEO 9.5%10. Employee/Labor Relations 8.8%
Top 10 - Presidents’ Strategies to Address Financial Issues
1. Cut administrative operations & Services2. Increase tuition by 5%3. Cut selected academic programs & activities4. Freeze hiring for administrative positions5. Expand online education6. Increase part-time faculty7. Create new self-sustaining programs8. Launch/expand partnerships with other inst.9. Raise student fees for campus services10. Change benefit levels in health, retirement, etc.
2011 Inside Higher Education Survey of College & University Presidents
What are the three most important issues facing your institution over the next 2-3 years?
A. B. C. D. E.
0% 0% 0%0%0%
A. Budget shortfallsB. Changes in state
supportC. Rising
tuition/affordabilityD. Increased
competition for students
E. Maintaining quality of academic programs
Three Most Important Issues in the Next Two-Three Years – Public Institutions
(Presidents Survey Inside Higher Ed – March 2011)_________________________________________________
1. Budget Shortfalls2. Changes in State Support3. Remediation/Student Readiness
Doctoral Universities Master’s Institutions Baccalaureate Institutions
Community Colleges
Budget shortfalls – 57.6%
Budget shortfalls – 58.7%
Budget shortfalls – 56.9%
Budget shortfalls – 64.5%
Changes in state support – 62.5%
Changes in state support – 54.8%
Changes in state support – 39.2%
Changes in state support – 37.9%
Maintaining qualityof academic programs – 28.8%
Maintaining the quality of academicprograms– 24%
TIE: Rising tuition/affordability and Maintainingquality of academic programs – 17.6%
Remediation and student readiness for College – 27.2%
Rising tuition / affordability – 16.9%
Rising tuition / affordability - 24%
Increased competition for students – 13.7
Limits on our ability to respond to risingenrollments/increased demand – 20.4%
Potential cuts in federal research support – 16.3%
TIE: Increased competition for students andStudent assessment/ institutional outcomes – 13.7%
Student assessment / institutionaloutcomes – 13.7%
Rising tuition / affordability – 15.1%
2011 Inside Higher Education Survey of College & University Presidents
Three Most Important Issues in the Next Two-Three Years – Private Institutions
(Presidents Survey Inside Higher Ed – March 2011)_________________________________________________
1. Rising tuition/affordability2. Competition for students3. Budget shortfalls
Doctoral Universities Master’s Institutions Baccalaureate Institutions
Associate Institutions
Rising tuition / affordability – 41.4%
Rising tuition / affordability – 45.4%
Rising tuition / affordability – 40.5%
Rising tuition / affordability – 42.1%
Budget shortfalls – 34.5%
Increased competition for students – 38.9%
Increased competition for students – 36.9%
TIE: Budget shortfalls and Increasedcompetition for students – 31.6%
Potential cuts in federalresearch support – 20.7%
Budget shortfalls – 29.6%
Budget shortfalls – 33.3%
Potential cuts in federalstudent aid programs – 21.1%
Maintaining the qualityof academic programs – 17.2%
Potential cuts in federalstudent aid programs – 18.5%
Potential cuts in statestudent aid programs – 26.2%
Limits on our ability to respondto rising enrollments/increased demand – 15.8%
Potential cuts in statefinancial aid programs – 16.7%
Potential cuts in statestudent aid programs – 12.3%
Financial support from alumni – 17.9% 2011 Inside Higher Education
Survey of College & University Presidents
Questions?