Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    1/16

    Economic Evaluation of Transport

    Projects

    Camilo Prez

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    2/16

    The evaluation of transport projects requirescomparing the situation with and without theproject, as well as comparing it with the next bestalternative.(With / Without / Or)

    The purpose of most transport projects is to lowertransport costs.

    The most common direct benefits of transportprojects include

    Savings in vehicle operating costs

    Time savings

    Reduction in the frequency and severity of accidents

    Increased comfort, convenience, and reliability ofservice.

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    3/16

    Logic

    More cars

    CongestionIndividual

    Costs & Road

    Maintenance

    COSTLY!

    People still go out but

    will be expensive and

    not a good experience

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    4/16

    TravelCostpervehicle/Km

    Traffic Volume per unit of time

    a

    bd

    C1

    C2

    Q1 Q2

    S1

    S2

    D

    New project

    Base load Traffic

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    5/16

    TravelCostperve

    hicle/Km

    Traffic Volume per unit of time

    a

    bd

    C1

    C2

    Q1 Q2

    S1

    S2

    D

    New project

    Base load Traffic

    Benefits

    For Old users

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    6/16

    TravelCostperve

    hicle/Km

    Traffic Volume per unit of time

    a

    bd

    C1

    C2

    Q1 Q2

    S1

    S2

    D

    New project

    Base load Traffic

    Benefits

    For New users

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    7/16

    Net Benefits for new users

    Cost = (Q2 - Q1 ) x Cost of each trip

    TravelCostpervehicle/

    Km

    Traffic Volume per unit of time

    a

    bd

    C1

    C2

    Q1 Q2

    S1

    S2

    D

    New

    project

    Net Benefit =1

    2(Q2 - Q1 )(C2 - C1 ) per unit of time

    Benefit = Area Q1 dab Q2

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    8/16

    Economic Analysis

    Q1 (C1 - C2 )

    +1

    2(Q2 - Q1 )(C2 - C1 )

    + road maintenance costs+ benefits reduced traffic in alternative routes

    costs of increased traffic in feeder roads.

    Benefits of old users

    Benefits of new users

    Analysts can apply this conceptual

    framework to any transport project

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    9/16

    Forecasting Demand

    The first step in assessing demand is to estimate baseline traffic flows

    The second step is to project future demand with the project, and without the

    project

    The simplest method to estimate demand stemming from normal traffic

    is to extrapolate from past trends and assume that growth will remain

    constant in either absolute or relative terms.

    Demand = F (Expected GDP growth, Pop. growth, Fuel prices changes,

    Other explanatory variables)

    Demand-based projections also require income and price elasticities.

    Use demand functions for new projects that estimate the response of

    traffic flows to changes in transport costs

    Normal, Generated, and Diverted Traffic

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    10/16

    Reduction of Vehicle Operating Costs

    Such savings usually include fuel and lubricants; tires; maintenance; and economic

    depreciation, such as vehicle wear and tear.

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    11/16

    Time saving

    Can be measured depending of its use:

    The Value of Working Time: Time saved = Time used to produce G&S. Valuated

    at wage rate. (But in terms of the employer / include SS)

    Leisure time: Time saved cost < Cost of working time saving. In the absence of

    evidence, a good rule of thumb is to value all leisure time saved equally at

    about 30 percent of the travelers hourly wage.

    Walking and Waiting Time: Highly valuated because nobody likes these.

    Country-specific values is always preferable, in the absenceof such values a good rule of thumb is to value walking, waiting, and

    transfer time 50 percent higher than in-vehicle traveling time

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    12/16

    Brazilian case Belo Horizonte

    City: Belo Horizonte

    State: Minas Gerais

    Population (2010): 20 Million

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    13/16

    Brazilian case Belo Horizonte

    Aimed to create an Integrated urban transport system to reduce travel andwaiting time. Other benefits included savings in vehicle operating cost, fewer

    accidents, and reduction of motor vehicle-related emissions. The project was

    also expected to facilitate access to employment and services, particularly for

    the poor.

    What the did?- Was underestimated because they measured time savings from diverted

    demand but not from the additional trips

    How they measured?

    Time spent in

    transportation in

    morning peak hours

    without the project

    Time spent in

    transportation in

    morning peak hours

    withthe project

    Hours saved

    Time saved x Average hourly wage

    17,5% AHV

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    14/16

    Valuing Time saving / Summary

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    15/16

    Valuing Accident reduction

    Physical damage to vehicles and property Costs of hospitalization

    Loss of output by and, hence, earnings for injured

    individuals

    Physical injury to drivers, passengers, or third

    partiespedestrians, for exampleincluding

    fatalities

    Pain and suffering.

  • 7/30/2019 Economic Evaluation of Transport projects

    16/16

    Questions