Upload
kathy
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics. Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University [email protected]. Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13. In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta: How to correctly measure I = GV Brief discussion: Roukes article Two typo correction HW02 Pr. 2.3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ECE 802-604:Nanoelectronics
Prof. Virginia AyresElectrical & Computer EngineeringMichigan State [email protected]
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13
In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta:
How to correctly measure I = GVBrief discussion: Roukes articleTwo typo correction HW02 Pr. 2.3
Add scattering to Landauer-ButtikerCaveat: when Landauer-Buttiker doesn’t workWhen it does: Sections 2.5 and 2.6: motivation: why:
2.5: Probes as scatterers especially at high bias/tempsButtiker approach for dealing with incoherent scatterers
2.6 occupied states as scatterers
3.1 scattering/S matrix
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article: TR possibilities:
F = q(v x B) = -|e| (v X B)
rebound directrebound direct
+ seems to be X B
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article: TL possibilities:
F = q(v x B) = -|e| (v X B)
rebounddirect
rebounddirect
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article:
HW01 VA Pr.01: x = 0.4, here it is x = 0.3
HW01 Datta E1.1Find f
HW01 Datta E1.2Find n and
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Two typos Pr. 2.3:
Roukes article: TR
rebound direct
Roukes article: TL
rebounddirect
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Two typos Pr. 2.3, marked in magenta:
Datta Pr. 2.3, p. 113: TL Datta Pr. 2.3, p. 113: TR
T2
1 X B
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13
In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta:
How to correctly measure I = GVBrief discussion: Roukes article: HW02 Pr. 2.3:
Add scattering to Landauer-ButtikerCaveat: when Landauer-Buttiker doesn’t workWhen it does: Sections 2.5 and 2.6: motivation: why:
2.5: Probes as scatterers especially at high bias/tempsButtiker approach for dealing with incoherent scatterers
3.1 scattering/S matrix
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
In Section 2.5:2-t example: with broadened Fermi f0
Lec13:
Practical example: Roukes
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
If T = T’, can get to Landauer-Buttiker but no reason why T should = T’.Especially if energies from probes took e- far from equilibrium.
i as a function of how much energy E/what channel M the e- is in
Lec13:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Can expect T = T’ at equilibrium.Consider: if energies from probes don’t take e- far from equilibrium:
Lec13:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
New useful G:
Lec13:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
E
Ef )(0
Basically I = G^V = G^ (1-2) ethat works when probes hotted things up but not too far from equilibrium
Lec13:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Example: does the figure shown appear to meet the linear (I = G^ V) regime criteria?
Criteria is: 1-2 << kBT
FWHM shown is kBT
Answer: No, they appear to be about the same (red and blue).
However, part of FT(E) is low value. Comparing an ‘effective’ 1-2 (green)
maybe it’s OK.
Lec13:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lec13: If T(E) changes rapidly with energy, the “correlation energy” c is said to be small.
E
T(E)
0.85
0.09
5 eV 5.001 eV
A very minimal change in e- energy and you are getting a different and much worse transmission probability.
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
2-DEG
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Example: in HW01 Pr. 1.1 you solved for for a 2-DEG in GaAs @ 1 K using the graph shown in Figure 1.3.2 .
Estimate the corresponding correlation energy c
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Answer:
Estimate the corresponding correlation energy c
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13
In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta:
How to correctly measure I = GVBrief discussion: Roukes articleTwo typo correction HW02 Pr. 2.3
Add scattering to Landauer-ButtikerCaveat: when Landauer-Buttiker doesn’t workWhen it does: Sections 2.5 and 2.6: motivation: why:
2.5: Probes as scatterers especially at high bias/temps Buttiker approach for dealing with incoherent scatterers
3.1 scattering/S matrix
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lec10: Scattering: Landauer formula for R for 1 coherent scatterer X:
Reflection = resistance
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
E > barrier height V0
E < barrier height V0
Lec 10: Coherent scattering means that phases of both transmitted and reflected e- waves are related to the incoming e- wave in a known manner
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lec 10: Transmission probability for 2 scatterers: T => T12:
That’s interesting. That Ratio is additive:
Assuming that the scatterers are identical:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Therefore: Resistance for two coherent scatterers is:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Resistance is due to partially coherent /partially incoherent transmission
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
1 Deg, M = 1
Example:probe
LR
X XO
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
probe
LR
1 Deg, M = 1
X XO
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Model the phase destroying impurity as two channels attached to an energy reservoir
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Influence of the incoherent impurity can be described using a Landauer approach as:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
Landauer-Buttiker treats all “probes” equally: what is going into “probe” 3:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
Landauer-Buttiker treats all “probes” equally: what is going into “probe” 4:
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Outline of the solution:
Goal: V = IR, solve for R
What is V: A – B
What is I: I = I1 = I2
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
probe
LR
A B
1 Deg, M = 1
X XO
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Condition: net current I3 + I4 = 0
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Condition: net current I3 + I4 = 0
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Condition: net current I3 + I4 = 0
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
LR