DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 1 Agenda Run IIb D-Zero PMG January 28, 2003 Overview, issues (Kotcher) Project status (O’Dell) Trigger technical

DZero Run IIb PMGJanuary 28, 2003

1

AgendaRun IIb D-Zero PMG

January 28, 2003

Overview, issues (Kotcher) Project status (O’Dell) Trigger technical status (Wood) AOB

Jon KotcherDZero Run IIb PMGJanuary 28, 2003


2

Run IIb Project Organization

D0 Run IIb ProjectJ. Kotcher, Project Manager

R. Partridge, Deputy; V. O’Dell, Associate; W. Freeman, Assistant

M. Johnson, Technical Coordinator C. Yoshikawa, Budget Officer; T. Erickson, Administration

WBS 1.1Silicon

M. DemarteauTBD

1.1.1 Sensors R. Demina, F. Lehner

1.1.2 Readout SystemA. Nomerotski, E. von Toerne

1.1.4 QA, Testing, & Burn-inC. Gerber, TBD

1.1.3, 1.1.5 Mechanics & Assembly

W. Cooper, K. Krempetz

1.1.6 MonitoringM. Corcoran, S. de Jong

1.1.4 ProductionJ. Fast, TBD

1.1.7 Software & Simulation F. Rizatdinova, L Shabalina

WBS 1.2Trigger

H. Evans D. Wood

1.2.3 L1 Track TriggerM. Narain

1.2.1 L1 Cal UpgradeM. Abolins, (H. Evans),

P. LeDu

1.2.4 L2UpgradeR. Hirosky

1.2.5 Silicon Track Trigger U. Heintz

WBS 1.3DAQ/Online

S. FuessP. Slattery

1.2.2 L1 Cal/Track MatchK. Johns

1.2.6 SimulationM. Hildreth, E. Perez

WBS 1.5 Installation

R. Smith

1.5.1 Silicon InstallationMechanical:H. Lubatti

Electronics: L. Bagby, R. Sidwell

1.5.2 Trigger InstallationD. Edmunds

WBS 1.4Project

Administration

1.2.7 Administration(D. Wood)

1.1.8 Administration(M. Demarteau)

1.3.3 Control SystemsF. Bartlett, G. Savage,

V. Sirotenko

1.3.1 Level 3 SystemsD. Chapin, G. Watts

1.3.4 DAQ/Online Management(P. Slattery)

1.3.2 Network & Host Systems

J. Fitzmaurice, S. Krzywdzinski

Red: Today’s speakersBlue: New silicon co-leader will be in place

Mar 1Agreement with Alice Bean was one year, ended

Aug ’02Two silicon Level 3 subsystems need co-leaders


3

Overview of Status Schedule “statussed” for Dec 1-31 time period (talk by O’Dell)

Second full shot since Nov 4-8 EIR Monthly effort reports being handled in straightforward manner

Work package assignments to individuals’ effort made by WBS Level 3 personnel in hour or two

Returned to Project Office, double-checked before sending to PPD Lunar report cycle:

Wk –1: Effort reports finalized Wk 1-2: Status schedule, collect monthly report information Wk 3: Integrate information, edit reports, identify change control,

discuss with project Wk 4: Report Laboratory, hand in to DOE

First monthly report drafted (bootstrapped from NuMI report) Overview of project status Milestone status & summary (includes Gantt) Narrative highlights to WBS Level 3 Variance analysis Cost reports

Tables to WBS Level 3, plots to WBS Level 2 Pending final approval, only BCWS available


4

Overview of Status

Have suggested COBRA/reporting meeting with all principals Want to have final machinery in place in anticipation of FY03

spending approval; many details to consider, commonality: Inclusion (or not) of R&D Handling of pass-through COBRA report output Change control/variance thresholds Timing of consultant visit Finalize form of monthly reports Tracking university costs Integration of actuals …

OPMO on board, setting it up “Office of Project Management Oversight”

First Production Readiness Review will take place Jan 30 “Purple Card” for silicon readout during testing, production Does not go in final detector, used for stand-alone testing at

SiDet Was useful test bed for PRR process, worked quite smoothly


5

Purple Card PRR

Review Committee: C. Gerber (UIC) J. Green (Fermilab) K. Hanagaki (Fermilab) S. Lager (Stockholm) R. Lipton (Fermilab, Chair) R. Sidwell (KSU)


6

Some Near-Term Silicon Milestones

Six Major Upcoming Silicon Milestones

Project Target Date

Current Forecast

Baseline Date

Comments

Silicon Prototype Mechanical Stave Built

12/16/03 12/18/03 1/6/03 Major integration milestone – was met

L2-L5 Sensors Released for Production

2/11/03 2/18/03 3/24/03 Further delays expected; characterizing sensors. Should not extend to baseline date.

SVX4 Released for Production

7/10/03 8/19/03 10/20/03 Excellent performance of initial prototype

Successful Fabrication of Electrical-Grade Pre-Production Silicon Stave*

7/17/03 7/24/03 10/10/03 Major integration milestone

Successful Readout of Full Silicon Stave

10/10/03 10/17/03 1/29/04 Major integration milestone

Silicon Module Production Begun

2/16/04 2/16/04 5/17/04 Remains on track* Not a DOE L2/Director’s

MilestoneForecasts remain

well ahead of baseline dates


7

Some Near-Term Level 1 Trigger Milestones

Five Major Upcoming Silicon Milestones

Project Target Date

Current Forecast

Baseline Date

Comments

L1 ADF shipped to Fermilab 5/2/03 6/23/03 7/11/03 Saclay designing, fabricating L1 cal front-end

L1 Calorimeter Trigger TAB/GAB Prototype Complete

7/16/03 7/15/03 9/29/03 Columbia/Nevis

ADF+TAB Prototype Integration

7/17/03 7/16/03 9/30/03 Major integration milestone: in-situ integration summer ’03

L1 CTT Algorithm Firmware Coded & Simulated with FPGA Simulation Tools

7/17/03 7/11/03 9/15/03 First major L1 CTT milestone

Fabrication & assembly of L1 Trigger Cal-TRK Match MTCM complete

10/20/03 10/20/03 11/10/03 Completion of production; based on current muon trigger cardsForecasts remain

well ahead of baseline dates

Level 2 trigger, online begin later


8

Run IIb Labor

Request for full-time electronics technician for silicon made at last PMG (Dec 10) Commissioning and maintenance of existing

testing, burn-in stands Cecil Needles joining us, first introductory tour

scheduled for this week

Other technical needs covered at the moment Project Office continually asking project to

anticipate their manpower requirements Collaboration help as well as FNAL technical staff Lead times can be unwieldy


9

Labor Cost Extracted from Schedule vs. Actuals (R&D)

FNAL Technical LaborAll Funding Sources

FY02 & FY03

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

$160,000

$180,000

$200,000Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Jun-02

Jul-0

2

Aug

-02

Sep-02

Oct-02

Nov-02

Dec-02

Jan-03

Feb-03

Mar-03

Apr-03

May-03

Jun-03

Jul-03

Aug-03

Sep-03

Calendar Month

Co

st (

FY

02

$)

WirebonderSF

MechTechSF

MechTechF

MechEngF

ElecTechSF

ElecTechF

ElecEngF

DesignerF

CompProfF

CMMProgrammerSF

CMMOperatorSF

AdminAsstF

Actuals: Oct = $168.5k, Nov = $132.8k (FY03 k$)No contingency or G&A in schedule prediction

Agreement quite good, but earned value is real measure (actuals, COBRA)

Actuals in FY02 k$

Scheduled labor in FY02 k$

Updated for Dec/Jan as soon as

information from PPD is available


10

Comments Significant Lab-wide parallel efforts (shutdown) never come

for free, but impact on Run IIb not as serious as initially thought

Loss of IIb SiDet personnel to Beams Division ameliorated by extra effort from other project principals

Experts within DZero redirected to Collision Hall work, but for reasonably short amount of time

Inter-cryostat gaps photographed, mapped out – required for further Run IIb design work

We have no argument whatsoever with the priorities!!! I am going to begin assuming that accelerator will run only at

396 nsec Studies & document outlining utility of SIFT upgrade for physics

at 396 nsec being completed (Bross, Hildreth, et al.) In event SIFT is deemed to be unnecessary, personnel on SIFT

project should be redirected within DZero Have particular interest in integrating P. Rubinov into group of

Run II(b) electronics experts – sore and obvious need Formal statement on 132 from Lab would be useful Will discuss privately with Mont, et al.


11

Comments

Jan 18-23 trip to France to discuss terms of Saclay involvement in Level 1 Calorimeter Trigger very productive

Responsible for front-end (ADF) trigger boards – ADC/Digital Filtering

LHC commitments might compete with proper Run IIb completion

Saclay has agreed to seek extension of their involvement beyond initially proposed 2005 time scale

Things like: Delays in obtaining FY03 spending approval Further bottoms-up evaluations of Run IIb project

…send very powerful message. Make it increasingly difficult to maintain committed core of upgrade groups and personnel.


12

Conclusions

Project making steady, solid technical progress No change control thresholds yet encountered, but

SVX4 is on (schedule) cusp Project tracking machinery being continually

developed & shaken out

COBRA and its implementation an important ingredient to nail down now

Lead time associated with labor requests might grow into a concern as project heats up

Will try on our end to make our requests as early on, and as well-defined, as possible

Cultural stasis exhibited by all entities poses a continuous difficulty – schedule drives these projects!

Documents

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 1 Agenda Run IIb D-Zero PMG January 28, 2003 Overview, issues (Kotcher) Project status (O’Dell) Trigger technical