DRY DENSITY / OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT REPORT

Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Sample No

Test Procedure: AS1289.5.1.1 Dry Density / Moisture Content Relationship - Standard Compaction

AS1289.2.1.1 Moisture Content - Oven Drying Method (Standard Method)

Sampling:

Preparation:

Authorised Signatory:

NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 14874

Macquarie Geotechnical

U7/8 10 Bradford Street

Alexandria NSW 2015

Curing Time 124 hrs

Liquid Limit Determination Technician Assessment

16/07/2019

Prepared in accordance with the test method

Maximum Dry Density (t/m3) 1.772

Chris Lloyd Date:

Optimum Moisture Content (%) 16.3

Oversize Retained on 19mm sieve (%) 0.2

Oversize Retained on 37.5mm sieve (%) 0.0

DRY DENSITY / OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT REPORT

Arup BH11 0.3-0.7m

Address Level 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000 AustraliaSample

DescriptionSilty CLAY

SYD55 S49625-MDD

S19311-1 S49625

Sampled by Client Date Sampled: Unknown

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing.

The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included in thisdocument are traceable to Australian/national standards. This documentshall not be reproduced, except in full.

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

1.78

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

t/m

3)

Moisture Content (%)

Dry Density/Moisture Content Relationship

Issue 9 - 4/04/19 W49 - S49625-MDD.xlsm Page 1 of 1

Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Sample No



Sampling:

Preparation:





Alexandria NSW 2015

Curing Time 169 hrs


29/07/2019



Chris Lloyd Date:





Arup BH01C 0.0-0.5m



SYD55 S49626-MDD

S19311-1 S49626




1.41

1.42

1.42

1.43

1.43

1.44

1.44

1.45

1.45

1.46

1.46

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

t/m

3)



Issue 9 - 4/04/19 W49 - S49626-MDD.xlsm Page 1 of 1

Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No

Test Procedure: AS1289 7.1.1

Sampling:

Swell Test:

Swell on Saturation(ESW): 1.1

Moisture Content Before Test (%): 15.7

Moisture Content After Test (%): 20.3

Shrink Test:

Shrinkage on Drying (ESH%): 1.1

Estimated Inert Material Present (%): 0.0

Extent of Crumbling During Shrinkage: N/A

Extent of Cracking During Shrinkage: MILD

Moisture Content (%) 15.3

Shrink Swell Preparation:

Shrink Swell Index:

Iss: 0.9




Date:

26/07/2019


Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015

SHRINK SWELL INDEX REPORT

Preparation:

Silty CLAYLevel 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000 AustraliaAddress

S49627-SS

S49627

UnknownDate Sampled:

S19311

Soil reactivity tests- Determination of the shrinkage index of a soil - Shrink-swell index

Sampled by Client

SYD55

Sample

Description

Notes

Arup BH11 6.0-6.28m

Undisturbed



Issue 2 - 1/08/18 W72R - S49627-SS Page 1 of 1

Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


Sampling:

Swell Test:

Swell on Saturation(ESW): 0.4

Moisture Content Before Test (%): 29.1

Moisture Content After Test (%): 33.2

Shrink Test:

Shrinkage on Drying (ESH%): 3.1

Estimated Inert Material Present (%): 0.0

Extent of Crumbling During Shrinkage: N/A

Extent of Cracking During Shrinkage: MILD

Moisture Content (%) 22.8

Shrink Swell Preparation:

Shrink Swell Index:

Iss: 1.8




Date:

26/07/2019


Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015

SHRINK SWELL INDEX REPORT

Preparation:

Silty CLAYLevel 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000 AustraliaAddress

S49628-SS

S49628


S19311

Soil reactivity tests- Determination of the shrinkage index of a soil - Shrink-swell index

Sampled by Client

SYD55

Sample

Description

Notes

Arup BH02 1.5-1.8m

Undisturbed



Issue 2 - 1/08/18 W72R - S49628-SS Page 1 of 1

3.1 %

140.6 606 seconds

51.8 < 0.1 mm/min

S50382

-

Uniaxial Compressive Strength

BH11 10.22-10.38m

Sandstone

S50382-UCSSYD55

Level 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney

2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:

Storage Environment:

Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

18/07/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client

AS 4133.4.2.2 Determination of uniaxial compressive strength-Rock strength less than 50 MPa

Testing Machine:Matest 2000 kN Compression

Machine

Sealed at as received moisture

condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

15/07/2019

mm

mm

Uniaxial Compressive Strength 12

Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:

Average Specimen Diameter:

Mixed mode

Duration of Test:

Rate of Displacement:

Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:


The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Thisdocument shall not be reproduced, except in full.

Issue 2 - 20/07/18 W85RS - S50382-UCS.xlsm Page 1 of 1

5.0 %

140.4 601 seconds

51.9 < 0.1 mm/min

S50383

-


BH09B 7.51-7.71m

Sandstone

S50383-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

18/07/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

15/07/2019

mm

mm

Uniaxial Compressive Strength 5.3

Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Mixed mode

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:




5.6 %

128.8 610 seconds

51.8 < 0.1 mm/min

S50384

-


BH10 10.5-10.71m

Shale

S50384-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

18/07/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

15/07/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Mixed mode

Test specimen length to diameter ratio falls outside of standard limitations of 2.5-3.0.

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Deviation from

Standard:

Date:




4.6 %

140.9 602 seconds

51.9 < 0.1 mm/min


Specimen Height:


Mixed mode

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

15/07/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa

Arup



Chris Lloyd

18/07/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

S50385

-


BH01C 9.24-9.44m

Shale

S50385-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:




3.7 %

140.9 606 seconds

51.9 < 0.1 mm/min


Specimen Height:


Mixed mode

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

15/07/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa

Arup



Chris Lloyd

18/07/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

S50386

-


BH06 9.30-9.44m

Shale

S50386-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:




3.1 %

141.2 620 seconds

51.7 < 0.1 mm/min

S50387

-


BH08 13.73-13.9m

Shale

S50387-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

18/07/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

16/07/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Mixed mode

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:




Envirolab Services Pty Ltd

ABN 37 112 535 64512 Ashley St Chatswood NSW 2067ph 02 9910 6200 fax 02 9910 [email protected]

www.envirolab.com.au

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 224811

3 Watt Dr, Bathurst, NSW, 2795Address

Chris Lloyd, D StoneAttention

Macquarie GeotechClient

Client Details

27/08/2019Date completed instructions received

27/08/2019Date samples received

4 SoilNumber of Samples

S19311-2Your Reference

Sample Details

Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.

Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.Analysis Details

Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing.

NATA Accreditation Number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.

03/09/2019Date of Issue

03/09/2019Date results requested by

Report Details

Nancy Zhang, Laboratory Manager

Authorised By

Priya Samarawickrama, Senior ChemistLoren Bardwell, Senior ChemistResults Approved By

Revision No: R00224811Envirolab Reference: Page | 1 of 9

Client Reference: S19311-2

18016016070mg/kgSulphate, SO4 1:5 soil:water

790700320160mg/kgChloride, Cl 1:5 soil:water

490590320180µS/cmElectrical Conductivity 1:5 soil:water

5.45.35.65.1pH UnitspH 1:5 soil:water

28/08/201928/08/201928/08/201928/08/2019-Date analysed

28/08/201928/08/201928/08/201928/08/2019-Date prepared

SoilSoilSoilSoilType of sample

5.7-6.02.0-2.42.5-2.93.0-3.35Depth

BH16BH17BH18BH16Sample ID

S52380S52379S52377S52376UNITSYour Reference

224811-4224811-3224811-2224811-1Our ReferenceMisc Inorg - Soil

Envirolab Reference: 224811R00Revision No:

Page | 2 of 9


1,1001,5001,1001,400mg/kgMagnesium

30/08/201930/08/201930/08/201930/08/2019-Date analysed

30/08/201930/08/201930/08/201930/08/2019-Date prepared


5.7-6.02.0-2.42.5-2.93.0-3.35Depth



224811-4224811-3224811-2224811-1Our ReferenceAcid Extractable Cations in Soil


Page | 3 of 9


146.21415%Moisture

30/08/201930/08/201930/08/201930/08/2019-Date analysed

29/08/201929/08/201929/08/201929/08/2019-Date prepared


5.7-6.02.0-2.42.5-2.93.0-3.35Depth



224811-4224811-3224811-2224811-1Our ReferenceMoisture


Page | 4 of 9


Determination of various metals by ICP-AES. Metals-020

Anions - a range of Anions are determined by Ion Chromatography, in accordance with APHA latest edition, 4110-B. Waters samples are filtered on receipt prior to analysis. Alternatively determined by colourimetry/turbidity using Discrete Analyser.

Inorg-081

Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.

Inorg-008

Conductivity and Salinity - measured using a conductivity cell at 25°C in accordance with APHA latest edition 2510 and Rayment & Lyons.

Inorg-002

pH - Measured using pH meter and electrode in accordance with APHA latest edition, 4500-H+. Please note that the results for water analyses are indicative only, as analysis outside of the APHA storage times.

Inorg-001

Methodology SummaryMethod ID


Page | 5 of 9


[NT]10001601602<10Inorg-08110mg/kgSulphate, SO4 1:5 soil:water

[NT]91173803202<10Inorg-08110mg/kgChloride, Cl 1:5 soil:water

[NT]101173803202<1Inorg-0021µS/cmElectrical Conductivity 1:5 soil:water

[NT]10205.65.62[NT]Inorg-001pH UnitspH 1:5 soil:water

[NT]28/08/201928/08/201928/08/2019228/08/2019-Date analysed

[NT]28/08/201928/08/201928/08/2019228/08/2019-Date prepared

[NT]LCS-1RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest DescriptionSpike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Misc Inorg - Soil


Page | 6 of 9


[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<5Metals-0205mg/kgMagnesium

[NT]30/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]30/08/2019-Date analysed

[NT]30/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]30/08/2019-Date prepared

[NT]LCS-10RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest DescriptionSpike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable Cations in Soil


Page | 7 of 9


Not ReportedNR

National Environmental Protection MeasureNEPM

Not specifiedNS

Laboratory Control SampleLCS

Relative Percent DifferenceRPD

Greater than>

Less than<

Practical Quantitation LimitPQL

Insufficient sample for this testINS

Test not requiredNA

Not testedNT

Result Definitions

Australian Drinking Water Guidelines recommend that Thermotolerant Coliform, Faecal Enterococci, & E.Coli levels are less than1cfu/100mL. The recommended maximums are taken from "Australian Drinking Water Guidelines", published by NHMRC & ARMC2011.

Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds whichare similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.Surrogate Spike

This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortifiedwith analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.

LCS (LaboratoryControl Sample)

A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spikeis to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferencesexist.

Matrix Spike

This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selectedshould be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.Duplicate

This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as forsamples.

Blank

Quality Control Definitions


Page | 8 of 9


Analysis of aqueous samples typically involves the extraction/digestion and/or analysis of the liquid phase only (i.e. NOT any settledsediment phase but inclusive of suspended particles if present), unless stipulated on the Envirolab COC and/or by correspondence.Notable exceptions include certain Physical Tests (pH/EC/BOD/COD/Apparent Colour etc.), Solids testing, total recoverable metalsand PFAS where solids are included by default.

Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity of the analysis whererecommended technical holding times may have been breached.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis hasproceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as soon aspracticable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, thesample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics (+/-50% surrogates)and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics and speciated phenols is acceptable.

Duplicates: >10xPQL - RPD acceptance criteria will vary depending on the analytes and the analytical techniques but is typically inthe range 20%-50% – see ELN-P05 QA/QC tables for details; <10xPQL - RPD are higher as the results approach PQL and theestimated measurement uncertainty will statistically increase.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted during sampleextraction.

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meetor exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries forthe batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria


Page | 9 of 9

Envirolab Services Pty Ltd

ABN 37 112 535 64512 Ashley St Chatswood NSW 2067ph 02 9910 6200 fax 02 9910 [email protected]

www.envirolab.com.au

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 225329

3 Watt Dr, Bathurst, NSW, 2795Address

Ian Goldschmidt, Jasper Haines, Chris Lloyd, Jacob Lloyd, D StoneAttention

Macquarie GeotechClient

Client Details

03/09/2019Date completed instructions received

03/09/2019Date samples received

1 SoilNumber of Samples

S19311-2, SYD55Your Reference

Sample Details

Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.

Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.Analysis Details

Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing.

NATA Accreditation Number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.

09/09/2019Date of Issue

10/09/2019Date results requested by

Report Details

Nancy Zhang, Laboratory Manager

Authorised By

Priya Samarawickrama, Senior ChemistLoren Bardwell, Senior ChemistResults Approved By

Revision No: R00225329Envirolab Reference: Page | 1 of 9

Client Reference: S19311-2, SYD55

190mg/kgChloride, Cl 1:5 soil:water

170mg/kgSulphate, SO4 1:5 soil:water

200µS/cmElectrical Conductivity 1:5 soil:water

6.4pH UnitspH 1:5 soil:water

05/09/2019-Date analysed

05/09/2019-Date prepared

SoilType of sample

BH18 1.8-2.0mSample ID

S52378UNITSYour Reference

225329-1Our ReferenceMisc Inorg - Soil


Page | 2 of 9


870mg/kgMagnesium



SoilType of sample



225329-1Our ReferenceAcid Extractable Cations in Soil


Page | 3 of 9


13%Moisture



SoilType of sample



225329-1Our ReferenceMoisture


Page | 4 of 9


Determination of various metals by ICP-AES. Metals-020

Anions - a range of Anions are determined by Ion Chromatography, in accordance with APHA latest edition, 4110-B. Waters samples are filtered on receipt prior to analysis. Alternatively determined by colourimetry/turbidity using Discrete Analyser.

Inorg-081

Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.

Inorg-008

Conductivity and Salinity - measured using a conductivity cell at 25°C in accordance with APHA latest edition 2510 and Rayment & Lyons.

Inorg-002

pH - Measured using pH meter and electrode in accordance with APHA latest edition, 4500-H+. Please note that the results for water analyses are indicative only, as analysis outside of the APHA storage times.

Inorg-001

Methodology SummaryMethod ID


Page | 5 of 9


[NT]110[NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Inorg-08110mg/kgChloride, Cl 1:5 soil:water

[NT]117[NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Inorg-08110mg/kgSulphate, SO4 1:5 soil:water

[NT]104[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Inorg-0021µS/cmElectrical Conductivity 1:5 soil:water

[NT]102[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]Inorg-001pH UnitspH 1:5 soil:water



[NT]LCS-5RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest DescriptionSpike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Misc Inorg - Soil


Page | 6 of 9


[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]<5Metals-0205mg/kgMagnesium



[NT]LCS-5RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest DescriptionSpike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable Cations in Soil


Page | 7 of 9


Not ReportedNR

National Environmental Protection MeasureNEPM

Not specifiedNS

Laboratory Control SampleLCS

Relative Percent DifferenceRPD

Greater than>

Less than<

Practical Quantitation LimitPQL

Insufficient sample for this testINS

Test not requiredNA

Not testedNT

Result Definitions

Australian Drinking Water Guidelines recommend that Thermotolerant Coliform, Faecal Enterococci, & E.Coli levels are less than1cfu/100mL. The recommended maximums are taken from "Australian Drinking Water Guidelines", published by NHMRC & ARMC2011.

Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds whichare similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.Surrogate Spike

This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortifiedwith analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.

LCS (LaboratoryControl Sample)

A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spikeis to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferencesexist.

Matrix Spike

This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selectedshould be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.Duplicate

This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as forsamples.

Blank

Quality Control Definitions


Page | 8 of 9


Analysis of aqueous samples typically involves the extraction/digestion and/or analysis of the liquid phase only (i.e. NOT any settledsediment phase but inclusive of suspended particles if present), unless stipulated on the Envirolab COC and/or by correspondence.Notable exceptions include certain Physical Tests (pH/EC/BOD/COD/Apparent Colour etc.), Solids testing, total recoverable metalsand PFAS where solids are included by default.

Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity of the analysis whererecommended technical holding times may have been breached.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis hasproceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as soon aspracticable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, thesample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics (+/-50% surrogates)and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics and speciated phenols is acceptable.

Duplicates: >10xPQL - RPD acceptance criteria will vary depending on the analytes and the analytical techniques but is typically inthe range 20%-50% – see ELN-P05 QA/QC tables for details; <10xPQL - RPD are higher as the results approach PQL and theestimated measurement uncertainty will statistically increase.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted during sampleextraction.

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meetor exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries forthe batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria


Page | 9 of 9

Client: Job No:

Project:

Test Procedure:

RMS T262 Determination of moisture content of aggregates (Standard method)

Sampling:

Sample No.

S52366

S52368

S52369

S52370

S52371

S52373



Notes:

13.9

BH17 1.7-2.0m Silty Sandy CLAY 17.4

BH18 2.8-3.0m Silty CLAY 18.7

Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

11/09/2019


BH16 4.1-4.5m Silty CLAY 16.9

BH17 0.7-1.0m Silty CLAY, trace Sand 14.0

Source Sample Description Moisture Content %

Sampled by Client

BH4a 1.3-1.5m Silty CLAY 19.4

BH16 0.7-0.9m Silty CLAY with Sand.

Arup S19311

MOISTURE CONTENT TEST REPORT

Preparation:

S52366-MCLevel 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000 AustraliaAddress:


SYD55

Report No:

AS 1289 2.1.1 Soil moisture content tests - Determination of the moisture content of a soil - Oven drying method (Standard method).

AS4133 1.1.1 Rock moisture content tests - Determination of the moisture content of rock - Oven drying method (standard method)

RMS T120 Moisture content of road construction materials (Standard method)



Issue 1 - 18/06/18 W40R - S52366-MC Page 1 of 1

Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


AS1289 3.1.1

AS1289 3.1.2 Soil classification tests - Determination of the liquid limit if a soil - One point Casagrande method (subsidiary method)

AS1289 3.2.1

AS1289 3.3.1

AS1289 3.4.1

Sampling:

Preparation:

Liquid Limit (%) 63 Linear Shrinkage (%) 14.5

Plastic Limit (%) 19 Plasticity Index 44

Field Moisture Content (%) -

Soil Preparation Method:

Soil History:


Unknown

Notes

S52365

Sampled by Client Date Sampled:


BH16 1.8-2.0m

Chris Lloyd

Soil classification tests - Calculation of the plasticity Index of a soil

Oven Dried

Soil Condition:

Dry Sieved

Curling Occuring


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

29/08/2019

Soil classification tests - Determination of the linear shrinkage of a soil - Standard method


SOIL CLASSIFICATION REPORT

Arup

Address

Soil classification tests - Determination of the plastic limit of a soil - Standard method

Soil moisture content tests (Oven drying method)

Soil classification tests - Determination of the liquid limit of a soil - Four point casagrande method

Sample

Description

SYD55

Silty CLAY

S52365-PI

S19311

Level 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000 Australia



Inorganic Silts and Clays

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pla

sti

cit

y I

nd

ex %

Liquid Limit %

Plasticity Chart for Classification of Fine-grained Soils

Clay

Silt

Issue 4 - 21/09/18 W41R - S52365-PI Page 1 of 1

Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


AS1289 3.1.1


AS1289 3.2.1

AS1289 3.3.1

AS1289 3.4.1

Sampling:

Preparation:





Soil History:


Unknown

Notes

S52366



BH16 4.1-4.5m

Chris Lloyd


Oven Dried

Soil Condition:

Dry Sieved

Curling Occuring


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

29/08/2019




Arup

Address




Sample

Description

SYD55

Silty CLAY

S52366-PI

S19311





0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pla

sti

cit

y I

nd

ex %

Liquid Limit %


Clay

Silt


Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


AS1289 3.1.1


AS1289 3.2.1

AS1289 3.3.1

AS1289 3.4.1

Sampling:

Preparation:

Liquid Limit (%) 39 Linear Shrinkage (%) -




Soil History:


Unknown

Notes

S52368



BH17 0.7-1.0m

Chris Lloyd


Oven Dried

Soil Condition:

Dry Sieved


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

11/09/2019




Arup

Address




Sample

Description

SYD55

Silty CLAY, trace Sand

S52368-PI

S19311





0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pla

sti

cit

y I

nd

ex %

Liquid Limit %


Clay

Silt


Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


AS1289 3.1.1


AS1289 3.2.1

AS1289 3.3.1

AS1289 3.4.1

Sampling:

Preparation:





Soil History:


Unknown

Notes

S52370



BH18 2.8-3.0m

Chris Lloyd


Oven Dried

Soil Condition:

Dry Sieved

Cracking Occuring


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

29/08/2019




Arup

Address




Sample

Description

SYD55

Silty CLAY

S52370-PI

S19311





0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pla

sti

cit

y I

nd

ex %

Liquid Limit %


Clay

Silt


Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


AS1289 3.1.1


AS1289 3.2.1

AS1289 3.3.1

AS1289 3.4.1

Sampling:

Preparation:

Liquid Limit (%) 46 Linear Shrinkage (%) -




Soil History:


Unknown

Notes

S52373



BH16 0.7-0.9m

Chris Lloyd


Oven Dried

Soil Condition:

Dry Sieved


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

30/08/2019




Arup

Address




Sample

Description

SYD55

Silty CLAY, with Sand

S52373-PI

S19311





0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pla

sti

cit

y I

nd

ex %

Liquid Limit %


Clay

Silt


Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


AS1289 3.1.1


AS1289 3.2.1

AS1289 3.3.1

AS1289 3.4.1

Sampling:

Preparation:





Soil History:


Unknown

Notes

S52374



BH16 3.35-3.45m

Chris Lloyd


Oven Dried

Soil Condition:

Dry Sieved

Curling Occuring


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

29/08/2019




Arup

Address




Sample

Description

SYD55

Silty CLAY, trace Sand

S52374-PI

S19311





0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pla

sti

cit

y I

nd

ex %

Liquid Limit %


Clay

Silt


Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Lab No


AS1289 3.1.1


AS1289 3.2.1

AS1289 3.3.1

AS1289 3.4.1

Sampling:

Preparation:





Soil History:


Unknown

Notes

S52375



BH18 0.4-0.8m

Chris Lloyd


Oven Dried

Soil Condition:

Dry Sieved

Cracking Occuring


Alexandria NSW 2015


Date:

29/08/2019




Arup

Address




Sample

Description

SYD55

Silty CLAY

S52375-PI

S19311





0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pla

sti

cit

y I

nd

ex %

Liquid Limit %


Clay

Silt


Client: Source:

Project: Report No.:

Job No.: Lab No.:

Test Procedure: AS1289.3.6.3 Soil classification tests - Determination of the particle size distribution of a soil - Standard method of fine analysis using a hydrometer

AS1289.3.6.1 Soil classification tests - Determination of particle size distribution of a soil standard method sieving

Sampling: Unknown

Sieve Specification Sieve Specification

Apperture: % (..) Aperture: % (..)

(mm) Passing Envelope (mm) Passing Envelope

200 - 1.180 92

75 - 0.600 91

63 - 0.425 91

37.5 - 0.300 90

26.5 - 0.212 89

19.0 - 0.150 86

13.2 - 0.075 75

9.5 - 0.050 72

6.7 - 0.020 59

4.75 - 0.010 55

2.36 100 0.005 52

0.002 43



Loss in Pre-treatment of Material (%)

Method of Dispersion:

Hydrometer Type: ASTM

Sodium Hexametaphosphate / Sodium Carbonate

0

Address:

Preparation: Prepared in accordance with the test method

Arup BH16 2.8-3.0m

Silty CLAY, with SAND

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION (HYDROMETER) REPORT

Sample

Description:

S52367S19311

Chris Lloyd


SYD55 S52367-HYD

Sampled by Client

Date:

Date Sampled:

11/09/2019


Alexandria NSW 2015

Level 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000

Australia

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

% P

ass

ing

Sieve Aperture (mm)

GravelSandSiltClay



Cobbles

Issue 1 - 18/06/18 W44R - S52367-HYD Page 1 of 1

Client: Source:

Project: Report No.:

Job No.: Lab No.:

Test Procedure: AS1289.3.6.3 Soil classification tests - Determination of the particle size distribution of a soil - Standard method of fine analysis using a hydrometer

AS1289.3.6.1 Soil classification tests - Determination of particle size distribution of a soil standard method sieving

Sampling: Unknown

Sieve Specification Sieve Specification

Apperture: % (..) Aperture: % (..)

(mm) Passing Envelope (mm) Passing Envelope

200 - 1.180 96

75 - 0.600 94

63 - 0.425 93

37.5 - 0.300 91

26.5 - 0.212 89

19.0 - 0.150 84

13.2 - 0.075 75

9.5 - 0.050 71

6.7 - 0.020 61

4.75 - 0.010 58

2.36 100 0.005 53

0.002 41



Loss in Pre-treatment of Material (%)

Method of Dispersion:

Hydrometer Type: ASTM

Sodium Hexametaphosphate / Sodium Carbonate

0

Address:

Preparation: Prepared in accordance with the test method

Arup BH16 0.7-0.9m

Silty CLAY with Sand.

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION (HYDROMETER) REPORT

Sample

Description:

S52373S19311

Chris Lloyd


SYD55 S52373-HYD

Sampled by Client

Date:

Date Sampled:

28/08/2019


Alexandria NSW 2015

Level 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000

Australia

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

% P

ass

ing

Sieve Aperture (mm)

GravelSandSiltClay



Cobbles

Issue 1 - 18/06/18 W44R - S52373-HYD Page 1 of 1

Client: Source:

Project: Report No:

Job No: Lab No:


Sampling:

7

8

1

2

2.1

2.2

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

4

5

6

Distilled

Lab

22

5



"CARBONATE & GYPSUM"

"VIGOROUS SHAKING"

"IMMERSION"

"REMOULD ETC."


Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015

RESULT:

Emerson Class No.


Date:

11/09/2019

Water Temperature (oc)

Water Source

Water Type

Arup BH18 2.8-3.0m

EMERSON CLASS REPORT

Preparation:

Silty CLAYLevel 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000 AustraliaAddress:

S52370-ECT

S52370


S19311

Soil classification tests - Dispersion - Determination of Emerson class number of a soil

Sampled by Client

SYD55

Sample

Description:



complete dispersion

partial dispersion

no dispersion

does not slake

slakes

does not disperse

disperses

absent

present

swells

does not swell

slight

moderate

complete

moderate

slight

does not disperse

disperses

Issue 1 - 18/06/18 W45R - S52370-ECT Page 1 of 1

Client: Source:

Project: Report No:

Job No: Lab No:


Sampling:

7

8

1

2

2.1

2.2

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

4

5

6

Distilled

Lab

22

5




"VIGOROUS SHAKING"

"IMMERSION"

"REMOULD ETC."


Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015

RESULT:

Emerson Class No.


Date:

16/09/2019


Water Source

Water Type

Arup BH18 1.3-1.5m


Preparation:


S52371-ECT

S52371


S19311


Sampled by Client

SYD55

Sample

Description:



complete dispersion

partial dispersion

no dispersion

does not slake

slakes

does not disperse

disperses

absent

present

swells

does not swell

slight

moderate

complete

moderate

slight

does not disperse

disperses


Client: Source:

Project: Report No:

Job No: Lab No:


Sampling:

7

8

1

2

2.1

2.2

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

4

5

6

Distilled

Lab

19

5



Arup BH19 0.7-1.0m


Preparation:


S52372-ECT

S52372


S19311


Sampled by Client

SYD55

Sample

Description:


Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015

RESULT:

Emerson Class No.


Date:

11/09/2019


Water Source

Water Type


"VIGOROUS SHAKING"

"IMMERSION"

"REMOULD ETC."



complete dispersion

partial dispersion

no dispersion

does not slake

slakes

does not disperse

disperses

absent

present

swells

does not swell

slight

moderate

complete

moderate

slight

does not disperse

disperses


Client: Source:

Project: Report No:

Job No: Lab No:


Sampling:

7

8

1

2

2.1

2.2

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

4

5

6

Distilled

Lab

19

2.2



Arup BH18 0.4-0.8m


Preparation:


S52375-ECT

S52375


S19311


Sampled by Client

SYD55

Sample

Description:


Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015

RESULT:

Emerson Class No.


Date:

11/09/2019


Water Source

Water Type


"VIGOROUS SHAKING"

"IMMERSION"

"REMOULD ETC."



complete dispersion

partial dispersion

no dispersion

does not slake

slakes

does not disperse

disperses

absent

present

swells

does not swell

slight

moderate

complete

moderate

slight

does not disperse

disperses


Client: Source:

Project: Report No:

Job No: Lab No:


Sampling:

7

8

1

2

2.1

2.2

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

4

5

6

Distilled

Lab

18

2.2



Arup BH17 1.7-2.0m


Preparation:

Silty Sandy CLAYLevel 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000 AustraliaAddress:

S52369-ECT

S52369


S19311


Sampled by Client

SYD55

Sample

Description:


Chris Lloyd


Alexandria NSW 2015

RESULT:

Emerson Class No.


Date:

18/09/2019


Water Source

Water Type


"VIGOROUS SHAKING"

"IMMERSION"

"REMOULD ETC."



complete dispersion

partial dispersion

no dispersion

does not slake

slakes

does not disperse

disperses

absent

present

swells

does not swell

slight

moderate

complete

moderate

slight

does not disperse

disperses


Test Procedure: AS 1289.6.1.1 RMS T117 California Bearing Ratio

AS 1289.5.1.1 RMS T111 Dry Density / Moisture Content Relationship - Standard Compaction

AS 1289.5.2.1 RMS T112 Dry Density / Moisture Content Relationship - Modified Compaction

AS 1289.2.1.1 RMS T120 Moisture Content - Oven Drying Method (Standard Method)

Sampling:

Preparation:

Preparation & Specification Density & Moisture

Retained on 19.0mm Sieve (%) Lab Moisture Ratio - LMR (%)

Method of Establishing Plasticity Level Lab Density Ratio - LDR (%)

Sample Curing Time (hrs) Dry Density - At Compaction (t/m³)

Compaction Hammer Used Dry Density - After Soaking (t/m³)

Surcharge Mass Applied (kg) Specimen Swell (%)

Period of Soaking (Days) Moisture Content - At Compaction (%)

Maximum Dry Density - MDD (t/m³) Moisture Content - Top 30mm (%)

Optimum Moisture Content - OMC (%) Moisture Content - Remainder (%)

Material CBR Value (%): at a penetration of 2.5 mm

AddressLevel 10, 201 Kent Street, Sydney 2000

AustraliaSample Description Silty CLAY

CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO REPORT

Client Arup Source BH18 0.4-0.8m

Project SYD55 Report No. S52375-CBR

Job No. S19311 Sample No. S52375



Achieved Target

4.5 2.6

0 101.5 100.0

Technician

Assessment98.0 98.0

49 hrs 1.71 1.71

Standard 1.67

4 18.6

1.75 20.1

18.4 24.2



Alexandria NSW 2015

3

Notes:


11/09/2019

NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 14874 Chris Lloyd Date:



0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Load (

kN

)

Penetration (mm)

Issue 4 - 4/04/2019 W57 - S52375-CBR Page 1 of 1

Client Source

Project Report No

Job No Sample No



Sampling:

Preparation:





Alexandria NSW 2015

Curing Time 120 hrs


29/08/2019



Chris Lloyd Date:





Arup BH18 0.4-0.8m



SYD55 S52375-MDD

S19311-2 S52375




1.60

1.62

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

t/m

3)



Issue 9 - 4/04/19 W49 - S52375-MDD Page 1 of 1

4.8 %

147.3 622 seconds

50.9 < 0.1 mm/min

S52381

-


BH19 11.04-11.24m

Shale

S52381-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

11/09/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

6/09/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Tensile dominated

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:




3.2 %

91.4 702 seconds

51.8 < 0.1 mm/min

S52382

-


BH4a 13.05-13.22m

Shale

S52382-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

11/09/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

6/09/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Tensile dominated


Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Deviation from

Standard:

Date:




4.0 %

148.8 666 seconds

51.4 < 0.1 mm/min

S52383

-


BH16 10.3-10.5m

Sandstone

S52383-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

11/09/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

6/09/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Mixed mode

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:




3.9 %

139.2 702 seconds

51.6 < 0.1 mm/min

S52384

-


BH17 8.75-8.91m

Sandstone

S52384-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

11/09/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

6/09/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Mixed mode

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:




4.7 %

137.5 612 seconds

51.5 < 0.1 mm/min

S52385

-


BH17 13.14-13.29m

Shale

S52385-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

11/09/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

6/09/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Tensile dominated

Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Date:




5.4 %

108.9 605 seconds

51.4 < 0.1 mm/min

S52386

-


BH18 11.79-12m

Shale

S52386-UCSSYD55


2000 Australia

Report No.:

Sample Description:

S19311Job No.:

Sample Source:

Project:

Address:

Client:


Date Sampled:

Storage History:

Sampling Method:

Test Procedure:

Sample Curing:

Arup



Chris Lloyd

11/09/2019

Sealed

Sampled by Client



Machine


condition

Unknown

Lab No.:


Alexandria NSW 2015

Date Tested:

Failure Type:

6/09/2019

mm

mm


Moisture Content:

MPa


Specimen Height:


Tensile dominated


Duration of Test:


Other Pertinent

Observations:

Deviation from

Standard:

Date:




Documents

DRY DENSITY / OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT REPORT