DRAFT or FINAL FINAL - webcast.ottawa.ca

DRAFT or FINAL The Project Title (up to one hundred characters) CLIENT NAME TWO LINES

PROJECT NO. 1009999

2781 Lancaster Road, Suite 200Ottawa, ON

K1B 1A7

Bur/Bus: (613) 738-0708Telec/Fax: (613) 738-0721

www.jacqueswhitford.com

FINAL

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

Petro-CanadaStrandherd Road @ Kennevale DriveOttawa, ON

PETRO-CANADA OUTLET NO. 14174

PROJECT NO. 1030098

PROJECT NO. 1030098

REPORT TO Petro-Canada Outlet No. 141743275 Rebecca StreetOakville, ON L6L 6N5

FOR Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

ON Petro-CanadaStrandherd Road @ Kennevale DriveOttawa, ON

09/18/2007

Jacques Whitford Limited2781 Lancaster Road, Suite 200

Ottawa, ONK1B 1A7

Phone: (613) 738-0708Fax: (613) 738-0721

www.jacqueswhitford.com

Table of Contents

Project No. 1030098 Strandherd Road @ Kennevale Drive, Ottawa Jacques Whitford, 2007 09/18/2007

Executive Summary 1...............................................................................................................................Executive Summary 2.............................................................................................................................

Site Description and Current Operations 2......................................................................................... Records Review 2............................................................................................................................... Site Visit/Interviews 2.......................................................................................................................... Conclusions 2.....................................................................................................................................

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 3...............................................................................................1.0 General Information 4.......................................................................................................................2.0 Introduction 5....................................................................................................................................

2.1 Objectives 5...................................................................................................................................2.2 Scope of Work 5.............................................................................................................................2.3 Regulatory Framework 6................................................................................................................

3.0 Records Review 7.............................................................................................................................3.1 Information Sources 7....................................................................................................................3.2 Previous Reports 8........................................................................................................................3.3 Regulatory Information 8................................................................................................................3.4 Physical Setting 8..........................................................................................................................

3.4.1 Surficial Geology 8.................................................................................................................3.4.2 Surface Water Drainage 9........................................................................................................3.4.3 Topography and Regional Drainage 9......................................................................................3.4.4 Bedrock Geology 9...................................................................................................................

4.0 Site Description 10...........................................................................................................................4.1 Property Information 10.................................................................................................................4.2 On-Site Buildings and Structures 10..............................................................................................4.3 Historical Land Use 10...................................................................................................................

5.0 Site Visit Findings 11........................................................................................................................5.1 Current Site Operations 11............................................................................................................5.2 Waste Generation and Storage 11.................................................................................................

5.2.1 Solid and Liquid Wastes 11......................................................................................................5.2.2 Drains, Sumps, Septic Systems and Oil Water Separators 11.................................................5.2.3 Air Discharges and Odours 11.................................................................................................

5.3 Fuel and Chemical Storage 11......................................................................................................5.3.1 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) 11...................................................................................5.3.2 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) 11...................................................................................5.3.3 Other Storage Containers 11...................................................................................................

Table of Contents


5.4 Building Systems/Equipment 11....................................................................................................5.4.1 Heating and Cooling Systems 11.............................................................................................5.4.2 Hydraulic Equipment 11...........................................................................................................

5.5 Exterior Site Observations 12........................................................................................................5.5.1 Surface Features 12.................................................................................................................5.5.2 Fill Materials 12........................................................................................................................5.5.3 Wells 12....................................................................................................................................

5.6 Hazardous Building Materials 12...................................................................................................5.6.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) 12..............................................................................5.6.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 12.......................................................................................5.6.3 Lead-Based Materials 12.........................................................................................................5.6.4 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) 12.......................................................................5.6.5 Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODSs) 12.................................................................................

5.7 Special Attention Items 13.............................................................................................................5.7.1 Radon Gas 13..........................................................................................................................5.7.2 Microbial Contamination (Mold) and Indoor Air Quality 13.......................................................5.7.3 Electromagnetic Frequencies (EMFs) 13.................................................................................5.7.4 Noise and Vibration 13.............................................................................................................

5.8 Adjoining Property Information 13.................................................................................................5.9 Client-Specific Items 14...............................................................................................................

6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 15...........................................................................................7.0 Closure 16........................................................................................................................................

Table of Contents


AppendicesAppendix A Site Plans 17.......................................................................................................................Appendix B Photographs 20...................................................................................................................Appendix C Assessor Qualifications 27................................................................................................Appendix D Supporting Documentation 30............................................................................................

Executive Summary

Executive Summary

Site Description and Current Operations

Jacques Whitford Limited conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the vacantproperty located east of Strandherd Road and north of Kennevale Drive in Ottawa, Ontario, herein referred to asthe "Site". The Phase I ESA was conducted for Petro-Canada in support of development of the Site. Thepurpose of the Phase I ESA was to determine if evidence of potential or actual environmental contaminationexists in connection with the Site, which may be on the Site or neighbouring properties as a result of current orpast activities .

Records Review

Based on the historical information gathered during the Phase I ESA, the Site has always been either used foragricultural purposes or vacant land.

Site Visit/Interviews

No environmental concerns were identified during the Site visit. No interviews were conducted with personsassociated with the Site during the Phase I ESA, as no one with prior knowledge of the Site was identified.

Conclusions

The Phase I ESA has revealed no evidence of environmental contamination associated with the Site. No furtherenvironmental investigations are necessary at this time. The monitoring wells should be decommissioned in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903, as amended. The two berms of fill material should be assessed to determine disposal options, should the fill material beremoved from the Site during development. A regulatory response from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment is pending for all of the environmentalinformation they may have for the Site. Pertinent information will be forwarded upon receipt which may changethe conclusions and recommendations. The statements made in this Executive Summary are subject to the same limitations included in the Closure(Section 7.0) and are to be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report.

Project No. 1030098 Strandherd Road @ Kennevale Drive, Ottawa Jacques Whitford, 2007

09/18/20072

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

1.0 General Information

Client Information: Consultant Information:Petro-Canada Outlet No. 14174Robert Gillespie3275 Rebecca StreetOakville, ON L6L 6N5

Project Information:1030098, Z9100- PetroCanada - Strandherd Road @Kennevale, Ottawa, Ontario1030098

Site Information:Petro-CanadaStrandherd Road @ Kennevale DriveOttawa, ON

Jacques Whitford Limited2781 Lancaster Road, Suite 200Ottawa, ON K1B 1A7

Phone: (613) 738-0708 Fax: (613) 738-0721E-mail Address: Site Visit Date: 09/06/2007Report Date: 09/18/2007Site Assessor: Gordon MooreReport Preparer: Gordon MooreSenior Reviewer: Jane A. Yaraskavitch, M.Eng.,

P.Eng.

Site Assessor:Gordon MooreEquipment Room Manager

Report Preparer:Gordon MooreEquipment Room Manager

Senior Reviewer:Jane A. Yaraskavitch, M.Eng.,P.Eng.Senior Project Manager


09/18/20074

2.0 Introduction

2.1 Objectives

Jacques Whitford Limited conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the vacantproperty located northeast of the intersection of Strandherd Road and Kennevale Drive in Ottawa, Ontario,herein referred to as the "Site". The Phase I ESA was conducted for Petro-Canada in support of development ofthe Site. The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to assess if evidence of potential or actual environmentalcontamination exists in connection with the Site, as a result of current or past activities on the Site orneighbouring properties.

A site plan is included in Appendix A and selected photographs of the Site are included in Appendix B.

2.2 Scope of Work

The Phase I ESA carried out by Jacques Whitford on this property was conducted in general accordancetheCanadian Standards Association's (CSA) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Standard Z768-01(updated April 2003) and consisted of the following:

· records review including, but not limited to, publicly available city directories, aerial photographs, fire insuranceplans, geological and topographic maps· provincial government regulatory search· review of available environmental databases and records· review of previous environmental reports and existing title searches, if made available· interviews with persons having knowledge of the Site· a site visit· evaluation of information and preparation of the report provided herein

A Phase I ESA does not include sampling or testing of air, soil, groundwater, surface water or building materials.For this Phase I ESA, no enhancements to the CSA standard were made.

This assessment did not include a review or audit of operational environmental compliance issues, or of anyenvironmental management systems, which may exist for the Site.

The assessment of the Site for the potential presence of hazardous building materials was not conducted as theSite is undeveloped. When completed, this is done based on the age of the building(s) and components, and anon-intrusive visual review of the Site. No sampling of materials was conducted. A Phase I ESA does notconstitute a Hazardous Materials Survey or Designated Substances Survey.

The assessment of the Site for microbial contamination and moisture damage is usually completed during thewalk through of the building(s), however, as the Site is undeveloped, this assessment was also not conducted .When completed, the assessment is visual only. No sampling or intrusive investigation was conducted.

The professional qualifications of the project team are provided in Appendix C. The Site visit was conducted by Gordon Moore and Sarah Montesnao, B.Sc.Eng., of Jacques Whitford, onSeptember 6, 2007. The Site and readily visible and publicly accessible portions of adjoining and neighbouringproperties were observed for the presence of potential sources of environmental contamination. JacquesWhitford was not accompanied by persons associated with the Site at the time of the Site visit. No site contactinterviews were completed during the Site visit.


09/18/20075

2.0 Introduction (continued)

2.3 Regulatory Framework

In Ontario, the roles and powers of the Ministry of Environment (MOE) when dealing with contaminated sites areoutlined primarily in the Environmental Protection Act (R.S.O. 1990). The MOE has a mandate to addressconditions where there is an adverse effect, or the likelihood of an adverse effect, associated with the presenceor discharge of a contaminant. Ontario Regulation 153/04 - Records of Site Conditions, effective October 1,2004, provides advice and information to property owners and consultants to use when assessing theenvironmental condition of a property, when determining whether or not restoration is required, and indetermining the kind of restoration needed to allow continued use or reuse of the site. The regulation includesgeneric numerical standards for soil and groundwater quality for specific land and groundwater uses. A Phase IESA is an initial step in the site assessment process, which may lead to the requirement for restoration work ifactual or potential sources of environmental contamination are identified. During a Phase I ESA samples are not collected, however, if there are previous soil or groundwater sampleresults available, the results are compared to applicable federal and provincial regulations and guidelines. A Phase I ESA involves a review of any Site buildings for the potential presence of hazardous materials relatedto building components and materials. Specific federal or provincial regulations, guidelines or codes of practiceexist for these individual hazardous materials. Where required, this documentation is utilized to determineappropriate conclusions and formulate appropriate recommendations.


09/18/20076

3.0 Records Review

3.1 Information Sources

The applicable search distance for the records review included the Site, properties immediately adjoining theSite and other neighbouring properties where activities considered to be potential sources of environmentalcontamination were apparent. Information sources obtained and reviewed as part of the records review are listedbelow.

SOURCE INFORMATION/CONTACT

Aerial Photographs 1963, 1973, 1981, 1983, 1997, 2001, 2002, 2005

Fire Insurance Plans None available for the Site

City Directories 1997/98, 2001/02, and 2007/08

Previous Environmental Reports Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report -ShortFormat, prepared for Mr. Robert Gillespie ofPetro-Canada by Jacques Whitford, project #ONO63028, report dated November 28, 2003.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report,prepared for Mr. Robert Gillespie of Petro-Canada byJacques Whitford, project # ONO63028, report datedJanuary 7, 2004.

Company Records None provided.

Geological and Geotechnical Reports Geotechnical Investigation of Proposed Petro-CanadaRetail Outlet, repared for Mr. Robert Gillespie ofPetro-Canada by Jacques Whitford, project #ONO63028, report dated December 18, 2003.

Regulatory Infractions Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE), Freedom ofInformation and Privacy Protection Office

Reportable Spill Occurrences MOE’s Spills Action Centre

Contaminated Sites MOE's Brownfield Environmental Site Registry

Hazardous Waste Generator Registration MOE Hazardous Waste Information Network (HWIN)(Search date: September 5, 2007)

PCB Storage Sites National PCB Inventory (1988-June 2004)

Landfill Records Waste Disposal Site Inventory Database (1990)

City of Ottawa Landfill Report (October 2004)

Other Available Information MOE's Coal Gasification Plant inventory (1987-1988)


09/18/20077

3.0 Records Review (continued)

3.1 Information Sources (continued)

SOURCE INFORMATION/CONTACT

Water Well Records The Water Well Information System (1955 and 2005)

Geological Survey of Canada “The Urban Geology of theNational Capital Region” Subsurface database (Jan2006)

3.2 Previous Reports

Any previous environmental reports provided to Jacques Whitford are described below. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report-Short Format, prepared for Mr. Robert Gillespie ofPetro-Canada by Jacques Whitford, project # ONO63028, report dated November 28, 2003. Based on the information gathered during the investigation, the Phase I ESA revealed no potentialenvironmental issues or concerns associated with the subject property. No further environmental work wasrecommended for the subject property. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report, prepared for Mr. Robert Gillespie of Petro-Canada by JacquesWhitford, project # ONO63028, report dated January 7, 2004. Concentrations of the measured parameters in the submitted soil and groundwater samples were eithernon-detect or less than the applicable soil and groundwater quality criteria.

3.3 Regulatory Information

Environmental databases and records were searched to determine if the Site, adjacent or neighbouringproperties are listed. A list of the databases and records searched can be found in Section 3.1 of this report. All search results indicated that none of the reported activities on the adjacent properties would have adverselyimpacted the Site based on distance and/or the anticipated shallow groundwater flow direction to the south. At the time this report was issued, we had not received the regulatory response from the Ontario Ministry ofEnvironment (MOE) through the Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection Office to our inquiry for the Site.Upon receipt of this information, Jacques Whitford will contact Petro-Canada and comment on any findings ofenvironmental significance. A copy of the request is included in Appendix D.

3.4 Physical Setting

3.4.1 Surficial Geology

Based on the Geological Survey of Canada website, "The Urban Geology of the National Capital Region", thenative surficial soils of the Site are composed of clay and silt. The permeability of clays and silts are low. Asite-specific determination would be required to obtain a detailed soil profile and permeabilityinformation. Previous subsurface investigations conducted on the Site indicated the subsurface soil profile at theSite consists of organic material and silty clay over glacial till.


09/18/20078

3.0 Records Review (continued)

3.4 Physical Setting (continued)

3.4.1 Surficial Geology (continued)

3.4.2 Surface Water Drainage

The surfaces of the Site currently consist of foliage. Stormwater is anticipated to drain by infiltration and/oroverland flow. A stormwater manhole/connection box is located in the approximate centre of the Site. Ditchesare located on the western and southern edges of the Site. A sediment fence was found installed but in poorcondition upgradient of the western ditch. A tile drain outlet is located near the centre of western boundary of theSite.

3.4.3 Topography and Regional Drainage

Based on Geological Survey of Canada Topographic Map 31G/5, regional surface drainage (anticipated shallowgroundwater flow direction) appears to be to the south towards a branch of the Jock River located approximately700 metres from the Site.

It should be noted that the direction of the shallow groundwater flow in limited areas can also be influenced bythe presence of underground utility corridors and is not necessarily a reflection of regional or local groundwaterflow or a replica of the Site or area topography.

3.4.4 Bedrock Geology

Based on the Geological Survey of Canada website, "The Urban Geology of the National Capital Region",bedrock in the area of the Site is limestone with interbedded dolomite of the Middle Ordovician GullRiver Formation. According to the website, the depth to bedrock ranges across the Site from 5 to 10, and 10to15 metres below grade surface. A search of the same website for surficial boreholes indicatesthat documented water wells located in the vicinity of the Site reached bedrock at depths ranging between 5.1and 16.7 metres below grade surface. Bedrock was not encountered during the previous subsurfaceinvestigation of the Site.


09/18/20079

4.0 Site Description

4.1 Property Information

The Site is located east of Strandherd Road and north of Kennevale Drive in Ottawa, Ontario. The Site iscurrently stripped of topsoil and is covered with weeds and various shrubs.

Current Site Owner: Petro-CanadaLegal Description: Part of the North Half

Lot 17, Concession 4R.F. Nepean

Property Area: approximately 11,200square metres

Utility Providers:Water: Not ServicedStorm and Sanitary Sewers: Not ServicedElectricity: Not ServicedNatural Gas: Not Serviced

4.2 On-Site Buildings and Structures

There were no buildings or structures on the Site at the time of the Site visit.

4.3 Historical Land Use

Historical land use for the Site was determined through historical records listed in Section 3.0. A summary of thehistorical information is presented below.

Period/Date: Land Use:1963 - 2001 Aerial photgraphs indicate that the Site was used for agricultural purposes between

these dates. 2001 to 2007 More current air photographs and the Site visit indicated that the Site currently has

been regraded and topsoil has been stripped off.


09/18/200710

5.0 Site Visit Findings

5.1 Current Site Operations

There are no structures or buildings currently on the Site.

5.2 Waste Generation and Storage

5.2.1 Solid and Liquid Wastes

No wastewater discharges were identified to be produced on the Site at the time of the site visit.

5.2.2 Drains, Sumps, Septic Systems and Oil Water Separators

No floor drains, sumps, septic systems, interceptors, or separators are identified on the Site property.

5.2.3 Air Discharges and Odours

No sources of air emissions that are suspected to result in residual contamination to the property were identifiedon the Site. Further, no strong, pungent, or unusual odours were identified during the site visit.

5.3 Fuel and Chemical Storage

5.3.1 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)

No chemical or fuel storage USTs were identified on the Site. Further, no vent or fill pipes indicating the potentialpresence of an abandoned or decommissioned UST were observed.

5.3.2 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)

No chemical or fuel storage ASTs were identified on the Site.

5.3.3 Other Storage Containers

No chemical storage was observed to be stored on Site as it is undeveloped.

5.4 Building Systems/Equipment

5.4.1 Heating and Cooling Systems

No heating or cooling systems are on the Site, as the Site is undeveloped.

5.4.2 Hydraulic Equipment

No hydraulic equipment is on the Site, as the Site is undeveloped.


09/18/200711

5.0 Site Visit Findings (continued)

5.5 Exterior Site Observations

5.5.1 Surface Features

No stained surficial materials or stressed vegetation was observed on the Site. No watercourses, pits, lagoons orditches were identified on the Site and no standing water was observed.

No other evidence of spills was observed at the Site during the site visit, and no previous spills were reported.

5.5.2 Fill Materials

The Site is at a lower elevation than the surrounding roadways and there is no topsoil. This may indicate thatmaterial has been removed from the Site. Fill material was observed on the north and south sides of the property. The material on the north consisted oflarge gravel and silty soils. The material to the south was fully grown over with the same plant species occupyingthe Site. This material appeared to be a large berm running along Kennevale Drive.

5.5.3 Wells

Three groundwater monitoring wells were installed on the Site during the combined Phase II ESA andGeotechnical Investigation completed in 2003. Two wells (MW03-6 and MW03-7) were observed on the Siteduring the site visit. These wells consisted of two inch diameter risers with a four foot steel protective casingaround each well. The berm located on the south side of the Site appears to be covering well MW03-2.

5.6 Hazardous Building Materials

5.6.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs)

As the Site is undeveloped, no suspected ACMs were identified on the Site during the site visit.

5.6.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

As the Site is undeveloped, no electrical equipment with the potential to contain PCBs was identified on the Site.

5.6.3 Lead-Based Materials

As the Site is undeveloped, no lead-based materials were identified on the Site.

5.6.4 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI)

As the Site is undeveloped, no UFFI was identified on the Site.

5.6.5 Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODSs)

As the Site is undeveloped, no equipment containing ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) was identified theSite.


09/18/200712


5.7 Special Attention Items

5.7.1 Radon Gas

Radon is a radioactive gas associated with uranium rich black shale and/or granite bedrock. Radon emits alphaparticles and produces several solid radioactive products called radon daughters. Harmful levels of radon andradon daughters can accumulate in confined air spaces, such as basements and crawl spaces. Based on the geology of the area and the lack of on-site structures or buildings, radon gas accumulation is notexpected to be an environmental concern at the Site.

5.7.2 Microbial Contamination (Mold) and Indoor Air Quality

No visual evidence of suspected indoor mold growth was observed on the Site, at the time of the Site visit, as nobuildings or structures exist.

5.7.3 Electromagnetic Frequencies (EMFs)

No high-voltage transmission lines or electrical substations, which could generate significant electromagneticfields, were identified on or adjacent to the Site.

5.7.4 Noise and Vibration

No major or persistent sources of noise and vibration were identified on the Site at the time of the site visit.

5.8 Adjoining Property Information

The current activities on neighbouring properties observed at the time of the Site visit and a summary of historicinformation gathered through the records review are presented in the following sections.

Direction From Site: Relation to Property: Current Use: Across WhatNorth Adjacent Residential Prem CircleOccupant Name: Address:

Current Activities:residentialHistorical ActivitiesagriculturalPotential Environmental Concerns:No potential environmental concerns were identified.

Direction From Site: Relation to Property: Current Use: Across WhatEast adjacent vacant and residential Cobble Hill DriveOccupant Name: Address:

Current Activities:undeveloped and residentialHistorical ActivitiesagriculturalPotential Environmental Concerns:No potential environmental concerns were identified.


09/18/200713


5.8 Adjoining Property Information (continued)

Direction From Site: Relation to Property: Current Use: Across WhatSouth adjacent vacant Kennevale DriveOccupant Name: Address:

Current Activities:vacant and undevelopedHistorical ActivitiesagriculturalPotential Environmental Concerns:No potential environmental concerns were identified.

Direction From Site: Relation to Property: Current Use: Across WhatWest adjoining agricultural Strandherd DriveOccupant Name: Address:

Current Activities:agriculturalHistorical ActivitiesagriculturalPotential Environmental Concerns:No potential environmental concerns were identified.

5.9 Client-Specific Items

No specific client requests were made with respect to this Phase I ESA.


09/18/200714

6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The Phase I ESA has revealed no evidence of environmental contamination associated with the Site. No furtherenvironmental investigations are necessary at this time. The monitoring wells should be decommissioned in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903, as amended. The two berms of fill material should be assessed to determine disposal options, should the fill material beremoved from the Site during development. A regulatory response from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment is pending for all of the environmentalinformation they may have for the Site. Pertinent information will be forwarded upon receipt which may changethe conclusions and recommendations.


09/18/200715

7.0 Closure

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of Petro-Canada. The report may not be used by any otherperson or entity without the express written consent of Petro-Canada and Jacques Whitford. All parties aresubject to the same limit of liability as agreed to in the contract under which the work was completed. Any usewhich a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions made based on it, are the responsibility ofsuch third parties. Jacques Whitford accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party asa result of decisions made or actions taken based on this report. In providing services to the Petro-Canada, Jacques Whitford relied on Petro Canada providing all existingstudies, reports and other available data, including those generated by Petro-Canada or by retained third parties,or reports done by others for which Petro-Canada was entitled to rely upon. During the course of the work,Jacques Whitford may also have relied upon certain verbal or written information provided by partiesknowledgeable about the Site, including government officials and other parties and on information contained inthe files of government agencies available to Jacques Whitford at the time of the study. Jacques Whitford hasnot independently verified, and accordingly shall have no responsibility for, the accuracy, completeness,workmanship or any other aspect of the information described above. Although attempts were made, wheneverpossible, to obtain a minimum of two confirmatory sources of information, Jacques Whitford in certain instanceshas been required to assume that the information provided is accurate. The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon conditions at the time the work wasconducted. The work was undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generallyaccepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. The conclusions andrecommendations presented represent the best judgement of Jacques Whitford based on the data obtainedduring the assessment. Due to the nature of assessment and the limited data available, Jacques Whitfordcannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities. Conclusions and recommendations presented inthis report should not be construed as legal advice. Since the purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify evidence of potential or actual contamination, the identificationof site conditions which may pose a non-environmental risk to buildings or people on the Site is beyond thescope of this assessment. (Examples include but are not limited to underground mine workings, volcanic orearthquake activities, severe weather, and/or flood plains in the area.) Jacques Whitford accepts noresponsibility for damages, if any, suffered as a result of any non-environmental risk. Should additional information become available which differs significantly from our understanding of conditionspresented in this report, we request that this information be brought to our attention so that we may reassess theconclusions provided herein. This report was prepared by Gordon Moore and reviewed by Jane Yaraskavitch.


09/18/200716

Appendix A

Site Plans

Appendix B

Photographs

Fill material on north side of the Site

Fill material and/or debris near northwest corner of the Site


09/18/20071

Inlet to storm water drain in the centre of the Site

View of the adjacent properties to the east of the Site


09/18/20072

MW03-6

MW03-07


09/18/20073

Berm on the south side of the Site

Berm on the south side of the Site


09/18/20074

Tile drain outlet to the west ditch

View of adjacent property to the south of the Site


09/18/20075

View of adjacent property to the west of the Site

View of Site and adjacent property to the north of the Site


09/18/20076

Appendix C

Assessor Qualifications

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR QUALIFICATIONS – Gordon A. Moore

Gordon A. Moore, B. Env.Sc. Environmental Scientist

Profile

Gordon A. Moore has been working in the environmental assessment and remediation fields since 2006. Upon joining Jacques Whitford, Mr. Moore has completed Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) of residential and commercial properties for financial institutions, property developers, real estate investment trusts, and other clients.

Education Environmental Technician – Sir Sandford Fleming College, 2001

Environmental Technologist - Sir Sandford Fleming College, 2002

Honours Bachelor of Science – Trent University, 2005

Competencies Site Visit

Report Writer

Appendix D

Supporting Documentation

Documents

DRAFT or FINAL FINAL - webcast.ottawa.ca