Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Developing and StudDeveloping and StudCatalysts for ProductCatalysts for ProductThrough Water SplittiThrough Water SplittiThrough Water SplittiThrough Water Splitti
Kevin J. Major
and
Sherine O. Obare
Department of hCH OHDepartment of Chemistry and the Nanoscale Science
Program
hCH3OH
CH2O CsepProgram
The University of North Carolina at
sep
nan
North Carolina at Charlotte
ying ying NanoscaleNanoscaletion of Hydrogen tion of Hydrogen inginginging
Pt nanoparticles
e- e-
e- e- ---
--
H2O--
h+ h+
- ---
----
-
H2-
- -
Charged Pt ti l Charged Pth+ h+
h+h+ nanoparticles Charged Pt
nanoparticlesCharge aration inaration in TiO2
noparticles
This This presentation focpresentation focof of nanoscalenanoscale catalystcatalyst
Need for New Methods of H22
Production
TiO
e-
h+
e-
Solvent
TiO2 Investigation of Charge Storage in Pt Nanoparticles
(Solvent)*Pt NP
uses uses on on developmentdevelopmentts for Hts for H22 production.production.
Synthesis and Characterization of M di PtMonodisperse Pt
Nanoparticles
Pt nanoparticles
e-e-
h+
e-
-
-- -----
- ----H2O
H2-
--
- -
H2 Production from Charged Pt
NPsh+
h+ Charged Pt nanoparticles
Toward a hydrogen eToward a hydrogen e
“Water will be the coal of Jules Verne, 1874
“150 M t d d“150 M tons per year neededJ.A. Turner. Science 2004, 3
Taken from: http://www.hydrogenhighway.ca/code/ navigate.asp?Id=220
economy.economy.
f the future.”
d f U S T t ti l ”d for U.S. Transportation alone.”05, 5686
Honda FCX Fuel Cell Car
Recent advances in hRecent advances in hresearch.research.
Taken from: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hyd
hydrogen productionhydrogen production
drogenandfuelcells/pdfs/doe_h2_production.pdf
Current technology inCurrent technology inproduction.production.
Steam Methane Reforming (SMR
CHCHCH
CO
CH
CO
Water Electrolysisy2H
4O
2H
4O4O4O
n place for hydrogen n place for hydrogen
R)
H + H O → 3H + COH + H O → 3H + COH4(g) + H2O(g) → 3H2(g) + CO(g)
O(g) + H2O(g) → CO2(g) + H2(g)
H4(g) + H2O(g) → 3H2(g) + CO(g)
O(g) + H2O(g) → CO2(g) + H2(g)
2O(l) + 2e- → H2(g) + 2OH-(aq)
OH- O + 2H O + 4e-
2O(l) + 2e- → H2(g) + 2OH-(aq)
OH- O + 2H O + 4e-OH-(aq) → O2(g) + 2H2O(l)+ 4e-OH-(aq) → O2(g) + 2H2O(l)+ 4e-
Steam methane reforSteam methane reforwidely used method iwidely used method i
Accounts for 95% ofhydrogen productionhydrogen productionin the U.S.
Mass production would requirewould require exchange of oilimports for natural
i tgas imports.
rming is the most rming is the most n the U.S.n the U.S.
The water splitting reThe water splitting rep gp gneed for multineed for multi--electroelectro
2H2O(l) → 2H2H2O(l) → 2H
4H+ + 4e
2H O →
4H+ + 4e
2H O →2H2O → 2H2O →
Catalysts must be: Robust
Cheapp
Constructed frocomponents
eaction illustrates the eaction illustrates the on transfer catalysts.on transfer catalysts.
H2(g) + 2O2(g)H2(g) + 2O2(g)
e-→ 2H2
O + 4e-
e-→ 2H2
O + 4e-O2 + 4eO2 + 4e
om sustainable elemental s
Understanding Understanding propepropethe the nanoscalenanoscale is is cruccruc
AA Au nanorods
Au nanospheroids
100 nm100 nm
Hollow SiO2d
Pd l tnanorods nanoclusters
erties erties of of materials materials on on cialcial..
SiO NiSiO2nanowires
Ni nanowires
Ni nanoparticles
Pd bnanoparticles nanocubes
The The challenge challenge of of nannanIs controlling Is controlling the the sizesize
Lx, rxn
Meta
P l diPolydisperse Nanoparticles
oparticleoparticle synthesissynthesise e and and shapeshape..
Lz, rxn
l ions
Polydisperse Nanoparticles
The The need for methodneed for methodmonodispersemonodisperse nanopnanop
L, rxn1
M t l iMetal io
MonodisperseMonodisperse Nanoparticles
s s that that produce produce particlesparticles..
Monodisperse Nanoparticles
L, rxn2
L, rxn3ons
Monodisperse Nanoparticles
ThioethersThioethers have beenhave beeneffective stabilizing effective stabilizing liglig
n found n found to beto begandsgands..
Ethyl Sulfide
Propyl Sulfide
Butyl Sulfide
Hexyl Sulfide
Dodecyl Sulfide
Small thioether stabilSmall thioether stabilwere prepared using were prepared using
Pt(acac)2
n-dodecyl su
h l thphenyl ether
210 °C, 40 min
ized Pt nanoparticles ized Pt nanoparticles a reduction method.a reduction method.
Pt nanoparticles
ulfide
r
Size Controlled Pt Size Controlled Pt NaNaanoparticlesanoparticles..
Characterization of thCharacterization of thnanoparticles.nanoparticles.
(a)
hioether stabilized Pthioether stabilized Pt
15
20
25
ency
(b)
2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.00
5
10Freq
u
2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0Diameter (nm)
u)
(200)
(111)(c)
Inte
nsity
(au (311)
(220)
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2θ (degrees)
Differential Pulse Differential Pulse VoltVoltData for 2.5 nm Pt Data for 2.5 nm Pt NaNa
0 00004
0.00005
0.00003
0.00004
nt (A
)
0.00002
Cur
ren
0.00000
0.00001
-1.0 -0.8 -0.
Potential
tammetrytammetry (DPV) (DPV) anoparticlesanoparticles..
.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0
(V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Investigation of the Investigation of the chchof Pt of Pt nanoparticlesnanoparticles..
(a) (( ) (
Light energy e-CB
h+Solvent hVB
semiconductornanoparticle
(Solvent)*
nanoparticle
harge storage ability harge storage ability
(b)( )
e-
e-
CB
h+
e-
Solvent
VB
semiconductornanoparticle
Pt Nanoparticles(Solvent)*
nanoparticle
Arguments against elArguments against elnanoparticles.nanoparticles.
- Subramanian, V.; Wolf, E. E.; Kamat, P. V. Journal of the- Wood, A.; Giersig, M.; Mulvaney, P. Journal of Physical C
lectron storage in Pt lectron storage in Pt
Ohmic contact induces i k t f f l tquick transfer of electrons
to the electrolyte.
El t t d illElectrons, once stored, will not discharge due to “electron sink” properties f Ptof Pt
e American Chemical Society 2004, 126, 4943.Chemistry B 2001, 105, 8810.
NanocrystallineNanocrystalline TiOTiO2 2 ((prepared using prepared using a Sola Sol--
((anataseanatase) was ) was --Gel Gel methodmethod..
~ 10 nm diameter particles prepared by hydrolysis of Ti(iOPr)4
Electron Electron trapping trapping andandconduction bandconduction band..
CB 1.0
VB e-e-e-
e-0.6
0.8
(a.u
.)hν
0.4
Abso
rban
ce (
CB e-e-e-e-0.2
A
VB h+h+h+h+ Solvent
Solvent*
0.0
Solvent
d d storage storage in TiOin TiO22
Electron buildup in TiO2 slide
before irradiation after 90 min irradiation
400 600 800
Wavelength (nm)
Electron transfer fromElectron transfer fromnanoparticles.nanoparticles.
Irradiated TiO slide with add
0.6
Irradiated TiO2 slide with add
0 3a.u.
)
(i.) TiO2 af(ii.) +0.1 m(iii ) +0 3 m0.3
bsor
banc
e (a (iii.) +0.3 m(iv.) +0.5 m(v.) +0.7 m
0.0
Ab
400
WavelenWavelen
m TiOm TiO22 to Pt to Pt 22
dition of Pt nanoparticle aliquotsdition of Pt nanoparticle aliquots
fter 90 min irradiationmL PtmL Pt
i.
mL PtmL PtmL Pt
ii
v.
iv.
iii.
ii.
600 800
ngth (nm)ngth (nm)
Capacitance of Pt naCapacitance of Pt nathrough reduction of mthrough reduction of m
noparticles examined noparticles examined methyl viologen.methyl viologen.
Reduction of methyl vReduction of methyl velectrons stored on Pelectrons stored on P
O1.0
TiO2 → Pt NP → Methyl V
0 6
0.8
(a.u
.) (i.) Ti(ii.) T
0.4
0.6
bsor
banc
e ( ( )
(iii.) +(iv.) +
0.2
Ab
400 5000.0
Wa elengWaveleng
viologen using viologen using Pt nanoparticles.Pt nanoparticles.
fViologen electron transfer test
O2 before irradiationTiO2 after 30 min irradiation2
+ 0.5 mL Pt NPs+ 0.5 mL Methyl Viologen
iv.
ii.
600 700 800
iii.
gth (nm)
i.
gth (nm)
Currently TiOCurrently TiO22/Pt H/Pt H22 gg22 22employ Pt doped TiOemploy Pt doped TiO
Abe, R.; Sayama, K.; Arakawa, H. Chemical PhysicsAbe, R.; Sayama, K.; Arakawa, H. Chemical Physics Letters 2003, 371, 360.
- Galinska A ; Walendziewski J Energy & Fuels 2005 19Galinska, A.; Walendziewski, J. Energy & Fuels 2005, 19- Bae, E. Y.; Choi, W. Y.; Park, J. W.; Shin, H. S.; Kim, S. B2004, 108, 14093.- Malinka, E. A.; Kamalov, G. L.; Vodzinskii, S. V.; Melnik, Photobiology a-Chemistry 1995, 90, 153.
Patsoura A ; Kondarides D I ; Verykios X E Applied C- Patsoura, A.; Kondarides, D. I.; Verykios, X. E. Applied C
generating systemsgenerating systems22..
Petkovic, L. M.; Ginosar, D. M.; Rollins, H. W.; Burch, , ; , ; , ; ,K. C.; Pinhero, P. J.; Farrell, H. H. Applied Catalysis a-General 2008, 338, 27.
9 11439, 1143.B.; Lee, J. S. Journal of Physical Chemistry B
V. I.; Zhilina, Z. I. Journal of Photochemistry and
Catalysis B Environmental 2006 64 171Catalysis B-Environmental 2006, 64, 171.
Recent work argues PRecent work argues Pprecursors to colloidaprecursors to colloida
Pt complexes act as Pt complexes act as al Pt.al Pt.
TEM images show colloidalTEM images show colloidalparticle formation after irradiationat λ ≥ 455 nm
- Du, P.; Schneider, J.; Fan, L.; Zhao, W.; Patel, U.; Castellano, F. N.; Eisenberg, R. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2008, 130, 5056.
Pt nanocapacitors usPt nanocapacitors usproduction from wateproduction from wate
Pt nanop
e- e-
e- e- ---
-
- --
---
Chargedh+ h+
h+h+CH3OH
CH O
Chargednanopar
ChargeCH2O Charge separation in
TiO2nanoparticles
sed for hydrogen sed for hydrogen er splitting.er splitting.
articles
- H2O
----
-2
H2-
-
-
d Pt 2d Pt rticles Charged Pt
nanoparticles
Pt nanocapacitors usPt nanocapacitors usproduction from wateproduction from wate
Comparison of Hydrogen Produc
1.0
u.)
0.6
0.8
d to
[0,1
] (a.
u
0.4
(nor
mal
ized
0.0
0.2
Sig
nal
Noticeable peak around 37-38 s
0 50 100 150
time pattributed to presence of hydrogen gas
sed for hydrogen sed for hydrogen er splitting.er splitting.
ction to Pure Hydrogen GC
Pure Hydrogen Production Test
0 200 250 300
(s)
In In summarysummary, , we havewe havecatalysts for hydrogecatalysts for hydroge
Thioether ligands are effallow for the formation of narrow size distribution.
Pt nanoparticles can be as needed.
The discharged electronagents toward methyl violsplitting.
e developed e developed nanoscalenanoscalen production.n production.
fective stabilizers and Pt nanoparticles with a p
charged and discharged
ns are effective reducing ogen and in water-
Acknowledgements.Acknowledgements.
Dr. X. Fan, Michigan , gHRTEM.
Dr. Panee Burckel, UXRDXRD.
University of North CaUniversity of North Ca
Th N ti l S iThe National Science
State University for y
niversity of Toledo for
arolina at Charlottearolina at Charlotte.
F d tie Foundation.