Upload
christopher-jacobs
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Why do I want to publish my results? To do something good for humanity? To impress girls/boys/parents? To improve my chances of getting into a good college/grad school/med school/ motorcycle gang? Vanity, ego, and/or several other themes encapsulated by the seven deadly sins? To establish myself as a resource in an area in which I am genuinely interested, so I can become part of an ongoing scientific dialog with scientists around the world?
Citation preview
Developing a Research Plan:Part 1
10/6/06
Is it Publishable?
• Rule #1–Do good science and don’t worry about
publishing.
• Rule # 2–If you don’t publish, you will not succeed in
science (publish or perish).
• Rule # 3–See Rule #1.
Why do I want to publish my results?• To do something good for humanity?• To impress girls/boys/parents?• To improve my chances of getting into a good
college/grad school/med school/ motorcycle gang?
• Vanity, ego, and/or several other themes encapsulated by the seven deadly sins?
• To establish myself as a resource in an area in which I am genuinely interested, so I can become part of an ongoing scientific dialog with scientists around the world?
What does a good CV contain?
• A quality pedigree• First-author refereed journal publications• Grants• Awards• Teaching experience (with evaluations)• Reviewing experience• Intellectual property• A Research and Teaching Plan
–Most important!
Ethics in Science• The basic rules:
–Do not invent/distort data–Do not steal data or take credit for the work of
others–Do not hurt your research subjects/animals
• The Protégé’s Bill of Rights:–The right to an experienced and judicious mentor–The right to due process–The right to be treated with respect
Getting Credit for Your Work• Order of names in publications/ corresponding
author• Lead author, senior author, equal authorship• List your % contribution after negotiation with
your advisor and colleagues–Origination of idea–Design of experiment–Data collection–Data analysis–Writing the paper
• You need a first/equal author publication
Early Independence
• Choosing a field of study• Using your advisor (Society appointments, study sections, etc.)• Showing independence from your advisor• Professional society involvement
Planning for Leadership
• There is little formal education for• leadership• Six principles (Duda 2004)
–Develop a vision–Cultivate a plan–Focus–Seek counsel–Periodically reassess–Enjoy the journey
Useful Sources
• Making the Right Moves: Howard Hughes Medical Institute practical guide for post-docs and new faculty.–http://www.hhmi.org/labmanagement/
• Becoming a Scientist: HMI investigators give theirviews–http://www.hhmi.org/becoming/
For Next Time:1) Read Chapter 11 in RIP-ing through Scientific Inquiry
– Creation of a Research Study Design – Handout
2) Analyze “Word Recall” data– means and SDs– Analyze for significant difference by t test.
• males vs females (overall)• males vs females on male terms• and males vs females on female terms
3) Make an “observation” which we will develop into a hypothesis– Be prepared to discuss a possible plan– This will NOT be your final research project so
DON’T PANIC!
Coming Up Soon:
• Handout “Great Papers in Biology” • Select one paper, read it and write an
(minimum one page, typed, double spaced) essay on WHY IT IS GREAT.–In most cases I have identified the web site
where the paper can be obtained for free.–Some papers are MUCH shorter than others,
but try not to use that as the criteria for selection
Why Doesn’t It Work?• Some very good ideas fail to give the
expected results because of unforseen circumstances or failure to take all the variables into consideration
• We will examine a logical idea that failed• HOWEVER:
–It failed for a very good reason–It taught the field something very important–It was responsible for the development of a
better design when it was repeated
• Cystic Fibrosis is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene
• 1 in 400 Caucasians are carriers
• Characterized by mucus in the lungs, chronic infection, pancreatic and gastrointestinal symptoms, infertility and early death
Logic of Gene TherapyRecessive disorder
CFTR gene defined
Airway epithelial CFTR deficiency
CFTR cDNA corrects in vitro
Vectors transfer CFTR cDNA in vivo
Cure CF?
Gene Therapy for the Respiratory Manifestations of Cystic Fibrosis
Transfer gene to airway epithelium
Express enough CFTR to correct CF disease
Safe
CFTR cDNA
Adenovirus as a Vehicle to Deliver the CFTR Gene
• High level, transient gene expression
• Efficiently infects airway epithelium
Ad vector
Adenovirus
Fiber
Pentonbase
Hexon
20 nm
20 nm
80 nm
Advantages: Can be produced in large amounts Can carry large genetic payload Can target to specific cells High efficiency
Disadvantages: Induces strong immunological reaction Transient expression
Adenovirus
Gene Transfer with a Marker Gene
Adenovirus coding for “blue” gene (-galactosidase)
Uninfected Ad.RSVgal
109
Vector-derived CFTR mRNA Expression (109 pfu)
100
10
1
0.1
Time (days)
CFT
R m
RN
A E
xpre
ssio
n
0.001
0.01
5%
Undetectable
Pre + 30+3cycle 1
108.5
108
Pre + 30+3cycle 2
Pre + 30+3cycle 3
1st 2nd 3rd
109
Host Defenses Against Adenovirus Gene Transfer Vectors
Time (wk)
Gen
e ex
pres
sion
100
101
102
103
104
0 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 24 25 26 27 28
Now what do we do?
• The failure of the Adenovirus cystic fibrosis clinical trial taught us:–Natural immunity is a major barrier to corrective
gene expression using Ad vectors–Other vectors, with longer expression times and
that evoke a less powerful immune reaction might work better
• These details have been used to improve gene therapy for CF–Details next time we meet
The Moral(s) of the Story• Research involves REPEATED analysis of a
system under different conditions to eventually come to a (more or less) full understanding of that system
• Analysis of a single parameter is an EXPERIMENT. A single experiment is NOT research.
• The lab is not a classroom, although you get a fantastic education there.–There are no answers in the back of the book in
research.