Upload
others
View
10
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Design Thinking in Healthcare
University of Lübeck15 September 2015
G A B R I E L A L D A Z
2
The design-thinking approach to innovation
A problem-solvingapproach to innovation
3
The Design Thinking Mentality
44
Focus on individuals
5
6
Case Studies
Hands-Free Chronic Wound Photography
Context-Aware Hearing System
7
Objective:Applications for Google Glassin the hospital
8
Clinical Immersion Observe & Interview
User Immersion
9
Identified over 135 needs at Stanford Hospital in these areas:1. Remote operation, emergency responders2. Training3. Improving Live Visualization4. Documentations (Checklists)5. Documentation (Overlays)6. Documentation (EHR Data)7. Documentation (Decision Support)8. Documentation (Video Recording / Photographs9. Communication10.Scheduling and Coordination11.Alert Fatigue12.Privacy 13.Administering medications14.Spatial recognition for remote monitoring
Needs Finding
10
User Needs Evaluation
Needs filtered based on Degree of pain Fit for Google Glass Study feasibility
Top score: Wound & skin care photography
11
Brainstorming
Hands-free navigation Sterility Voice control Head tilt Double blink Hand gestures
Scan patient barcode NameMedical Record Number Tag photos
Doe, JohnMRN: 013465DOB: 02.13.41
Date: 04.30.13: Time: 04:30
Historical image retrievalCheck healing progressWound staging
12
Google Glass
13
Mockup Electronic Medical Record
14
Pilot Study
2. Voice-based documentation
3. Head tilt(zoom in and out)
4. Double blink (take photograph)
1. Barcode scan with Glass
Hands free? Not quite!
15
More Brainstorming
Sound or light emitter; bi-directional communication between the external microprocessor and Glass
d Object
16
Dynamic Digital Ruler (Version 1)
Infrared distance sensor USB microcontroller Distance displayed in
Glass eyepiece
Distance displayed as text Poor accuracyMicrocontroller drains Glass battery quickly
17
Dynamic Digital Ruler (Version 2)
External battery Better calibrationCustom PCB Zoom by voice Dynamic scale on
Glass eyepiece
Improved accuracy, but can do better
18
Dynamic Digital Ruler (Version 3)
Version 2
Version 3
19
Pilot Study
Finally, hands-free chronic wound and skin care photography
20
Case Studies
Hands-Free Chronic Wound Photography
Context-Aware Hearing System
21
Objective:The next big thing in hearing aids
22
1.5 hr
Interviews
23
Interviews
Hearing Aids
Oticon Streamer
24
InterviewsWhat we heard about the Streamer….
25
1.5h interviews
Anthropological Study
5 hr
26
Anthropological StudyHow we saw the Streamer used (or not)
27
Insight
Interviews: Listen to what people say
Anthropological studies: Observe what people do
How do we find out how people behave in different situations?
NOW
1 DAY
WEEKS
28
Wearable Data Logging
Log data on Streamer, which many people have with their hearing aids
29
Wearable Data Logging
But people don’t use the Streamer!
Instead, use a device like a smartphone to log data (sound environment, location, time of day…) over a period of weeks
(Not so obvious in 2009!)
30
Wearable Data Logging
Data-logging device:Google Nexus One
smartphone
NFMI
31
Wearable Data Logging
Data collected Sound samples Locations Key presses Subjective feedback
Extended control over the HA and the
Streamer
User program change based on location
SoundBuffer
2 Oticon employees
Alpha Test
32
Obtaining User Input
Correlate collected data with hearing aid settings to find out what settings a user prefers under given conditions.
Present two settings, A and B User states preference Analogous to visiting the
optician.
33
Obtaining User Input
34
Beta Test
3 hard of hearing Oticon employees Loved the A/B Test. 5 choices too many. Keep to 3 choices: A Better, B Better, No Difference. Using open domes, often could not tell difference. Use micro molds instead.
open domes micro molds (more closed fit)
35
Context-Aware Hearing System
36
Context-Aware Hearing System
NFMI
37
Development Timeline
Thank You
Gabriel Aldaz [email protected]
S TA N F O R D C E N T E R F O R D E S I G N R E S E A R C H