Upload
bernard-madden
View
34
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Dept – Università di Pavia ________________________________________. Growth, taxation and the long run evolution of top incomes Discussion of A. Atkinson’s opening lecture Luigi Bernardi-Università di Pavia XVI Riunione Scientifica Siep Pavia, October 7th, 2004. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
October 2004 Luigi Bernardi 1
Dept – Università di Pavia________________________________________
Growth, taxation and the long run evolution of top incomes
Discussion of A. Atkinson’s opening lecture
Luigi Bernardi-Università di Pavia
XVI Riunione Scientifica Siep
Pavia, October 7th, 2004
October 2004 Luigi Bernardi 2
Dept – Università di Pavia________________________________________
Main critical features of
the general model
• Decreasing marginal productivity of capital
• Exponential increase of population
• Relevance of top incomes’ share for the overall distribution of incomes (Lc↓, Gw↑)
October 2004 Luigi Bernardi 3
Dept – Università di Pavia________________________________________
Top rates and share of top incomes
Model Top rate Share of Overall top incomes Inequality
- Managerial +/- +/- -/+
- Accumulation +/- +/- -/+
- New money +/- +/- -/+
October 2004 Luigi Bernardi 4
Dept – Università di Pavia________________________________________
National PIT: Top marginal rates 1985 2002 Changes
Canada 34 29 -5France 65 52.7 -12.3Germany 56 48.5 -6.5Italy 65 45 -20 Japan 70 47.1 -22.9The Netherlands 72 52 -20Spain 66 48 -18United Kingdom 60 40 -20United States 50 38.6 -11.4
Average (unwh.) 59.8 44.5 -15.3
October 2004 Luigi Bernardi 5
Dept – Università di Pavia________________________________________
Why to increase inequality?• Ex ante inequality is already increasing
• Redistribution through spending not be over valuated:
- pensions & social contributions in a life-time horizon - social services mainly consumed by the middle class
• How much more efficiency and simplification?
• Political economy factors:
- top 1% are few voters
- different ideological orientation of parties rates cutting
• More convincing evidences:
\ - correlation with levels of spending
- fiscal illusion, being difficult to cut middle income rates
October 2004 Luigi Bernardi 6
Dept – Università di Pavia________________________________________
What in Italy?
• Just unreliable fiscal data for 1976 – 1999
Year Top rate Gross top 1% Disp. top 1%
1976 72 9.5% 7.9%
1980 72 8.2% 7.0%
1985 65 7.1% 5.5%
1990 50 8.0% 6.4%
1993 51 8.2% 6.5%
1999 45.5 8.9% 6.8%