Upload
vanhanh
View
256
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Morten Tolboll
Deepak Chopra (The Matrix Dictionary)
In the following I will investigate the New Age guru Deepak Chopra, seen in relation
with American New Age propaganda.
Reviewing Susan Jacoby's book, The Age of American Unreason, Wendy
Kaminer sees Deepak Chopra's popular reception in the USA as being symptomatic
of many Americans' historical inability (as Jacoby puts it) "to distinguish between
real scientists and those who peddled theories in the guise of science".
This historical inability is the reason for the rise of New Age propaganda sites such as
Gaia.com, which influence is enormous, also outside the borders of America.
Gaia.com says in its introduction:
SEEKING TRUTH
Explore “Who are we?” and “Why are we here?” with specialists in metaphysics,
ancient wisdom, the unexplained and more only on Gaia.
Explore perspectives you won't find in the mainstream on some of life's biggest
mysteries.
Dare to Challenge the Status Quo
Explore Seeking Truth
Fact is that Gaia.com is a New Age propaganda site, or rather a propaganda site for
The Matrix Conspiracy as such. In that it is filled with Pseudo-scholarship.
Pseudo-scholarship is a work (e.g., publication, lecture) or body of work that is
presented as, but is not, the product of rigorous and objective study or research; the
act of producing such work; or the pretended learning upon which it is based.
It is clear that New Age and its obsession with science, and lack of scientific
knowledge or education, is filled with pseudo-scholarship.
2
Examples of pseudo-scholarship include:
Pseudoarchaeology
Pseudohistory
Pseudolinguistics
Pseudomathematics
Pseudophilosophy
Pseudoscience
Gaia.com is an attempt to create an alternative history. Alternative history or alternate
history is a genre of fiction consisting of stories that are set in worlds in which history
has diverged from the actual history of the world. Since the 1950s this type of fiction
has to a large extent merged with science fictional tropes involving cross-time travel
between alternate histories or psychic awareness of the existence of “our” universe by
the people in another; or ordinary voyaging uptime (into the past) or downtime (into
the future) that results in history splitting into two or more time-lines.
It is also creating a so-called secret history. A secret history (or shadow history) is a
revisionist interpretation of either fictional or real (or known) history, which is
claimed to have been deliberately suppressed, forgotten, or ignored by established
scholars. Originally, secret histories were designed as non-fictional, revealing or
claiming to reveal the truth behind the “spin”. Today we see how secret history
sometimes is used in a long-running science fiction or fantasy universe to preserve
continuity with the present by reconciling paranormal, anachronistic, or otherwise
notable but unrecorded events with what actually happened in known history; for
instance in the fictional time travel theories.
For example, the New Age product The WingMakers Story (see my article Time
Travel and the Fascism of the WingMakers Project) combines this with the urban
legend and alternate history from the Ong´s Hat myth. Though the WingMakers
website tries to avoid critique by saying it is a modern mythology (where urban
legends are considered as a modern folklore) it also keeps on, precisely as in urban
legends, to insinuate that the story is true. It is therefore a piece of pseudohistory.
Pseudohistory is purported history such as Afrocentrism, creationism, holocaust
revisionism and the catastrophism of Immanuel Velikovsky (see Robert J.
3
Schadewald). Pseudohistory should be distinguished from the ancient texts it is based
on. The sagas, legends, myths and histories, which have been passed on orally or in
written documents by ancient peoples are sometimes called pseudohistory. Some of it
is pseudohistory, some of it is flawed history and some of isn´ t history at all.
Pseudohistory should also be distinguished from historical fiction and fantasy.
Anyone who cites a work of historical fiction as if it were a historical text is a
practising pseudohistorian. There are also writers of historical fiction who
intentionally falsify and invent ancient history. A technique to do this is to claim to
find an ancient document and publishing it in order to express one´ s own ideas. An
example is The Celestine Prophecy. A variation on this theme is to claim that one is
channeling a book from some ancient being, e.g, The Urantia Book, Bringers of the
Dawn, and A Course in Miracles (see my article Paranormal Phenomena Seen In
Connection with Channeling).
Gaia.com is permeated with references to vibrations and energy, advices to avoid the
negative (you can tell good people by their eyes), stop doubting, follow your
intuitions and premonitions, flow with coincidences, believe in the purposiveness of
everything, join thousands of others on the quest, turn into your feelings and evolve
to a higher plane. Follow your intuitions and dreams as you go through your spiritual
evolution. Fact or fiction, it doesn´t matter. Truth is what you make it. Life´s too
short and too complicated to deal with reality. Make your own reality.
This New Age subjectivism and relativism encourage people to believe that reality is
whatever you want it to be. The line between fact and fiction gets blurry and
obscured. Subjectivism shuts down people´s critical faculties, making them
suggestible for any Ideology. It involves making people quit thinking critically in
order to open them up to thinking Magical about that Subjective validation and
Communal reinforcement lead to bliss. Hypnosis is in New Age directly used as a
means for inducing in people certain worldviews, or, actually, one ideology: The
Matrix Conspiracy (also see my article Hypnosis, hypnotherapy and the art of self-
deception).
Gaia.com writes:
YOU’RE HERE FOR A REASON
Your intuition tells you there’s more to our story, something you’re not finding in
your current paradigm. You can feel it in your bones. We are all connected, we’re
part of something greater, and there is something more meaningful in this life that’s
not present in our daily routines.
4
Your intuition is right.
Gaia is here with some new ideas and the world’s largest resource of conscious
media to – well –empower the evolution of consciousness. That’s a rather massive
vision, but truthfully, it’s why we do what we do at Gaia.
We want to create a new reality, one of mindful people living in harmony with our
environment and each other. And with you, we can do it. Thank you for being here.
We promise to light the fire if you will carry the torch.
So, Gaia.com is prophesying a New World Order (New Age) to emerge: the world of
Alernative History, Alternative Physics, Alternative Medicine and, ultimately,
Alternative Reality.
How, given the recent and sorry story of ideologically motivated conceptions of
knowledge – Lysenkoism in Stalin´s Soviet Union, for example, or Nazi critiques of
“Jewish science” – could it again have become acceptable to behave in this way? But
the reason is American´s historical inability. They haven´t experienced being slaves
under totalitarian ideologies such as National socialism and Communism.
The Fake News exposing website Snopes.com has this to say about one of
Gaia.com´s articles on alien mummies: http://www.snopes.com/alien-mummy-peru/
Finally, Gaia.com (formerly known as Gaiam TV) web site has a long history of
providing a platform for false and spurious pseudo-science, conspiracy theories, and
paranormal claims. The company charges $95.40 per year for unlimited access to
videos about remote viewing, contact with angels, alien abduction, crop circles, and
the like.
Chopra's "nonsensical references to quantum physics" are placed in a similar lineage
of American religious pseudoscience, extending back
through Scientology to Christian Science.
Physics professor Chad Orzel has written that "to a physicist, Chopra's babble about
'energy fields' and 'congealing quantum soup' presents as utter gibberish", but that
Chopra makes enough references to technical terminology to convince non-scientists
that he understands physics.
Chopra has especially been criticized for his frequent references to the relationship
of quantum mechanics to healing processes, a connection that has drawn skepticism
5
from physicists who say it can be considered as contributing to the general confusion
in the popular press regarding quantum measurement, decoherence and
the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. In 1998, Chopra was awarded the satirical Ig
Nobel Prize in physics for "his unique interpretation of quantum physics as it applies
to life, liberty, and the pursuit of economic happiness".
When interviewed by ethologist and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins (whom
I will return to) in the Channel 4 (UK) documentary The Enemies of Reason, Chopra
said that he used the term "quantum physics" as "a metaphor" and that it had little to
do with quantum theory in physics.
Deepak Chopra is the man behind my concept of Postmodern Spirituality. In my
article Constructivism: The Postmodern Intellectualism behind New Age and the
Self-help Industry I have explained how New Age has linked spirituality to
postmodernism.
Today, after having passed 1984, we live in a so-called postmodernistic dystopia,
where eternal values such as goodness, truth and beauty fall more and more away –
and where we have been invaded by the ideology of relativism, which rulers, in
creeping ways, use the same phrases as the rulers in Orwell´s novel, as if they had
used it as inspiration (the nearest to an attempt of actually creating a new language,
which implies some rules about what is considered as “negative” and “positive”, is
probably the creating of the so-called Giraffe-language – see my article Nonviolent
Communication is an instrument of psychic terror).
This new language accepts the use of thought distortions (see my book A Dictionary
of Thought Distortions).
Often you hear postmodern intellectuals use the following bullying of scientists:
“that they are hewing to the ´objective´ procedures and epistemological structures
prescribed by the so-called scientific method.”
They typically assert that this “dogma” has already been thoroughly undermined by
the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics and that physical reality has
been shown to be “at bottom a social and linguistic construct.”
This is used to term scientists as old-thinkers, for example that their critique is part of
a “patriarchal, racist, colonistic, eurocentric, cultural dominion discourse”
Relativists typically deride critics and scientists for continuing to cling to the “dogma
imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual
6
outlook, that there exists an external world whose properties are independent of
human beings, and that human beings can obtain reliable, if imperfect and tentative
knowledge of these properties by hewing to the `objective´ procedures and
epistemological structures prescribed by the so-called scientific method.”
And: “How can a self-perpetuting secular priesthood of credentialed ´scientists´
purport to maintain a monopoly on the production of scientific knowledge?”
Therefore they demand alternative sciences (and alternative views of human rights),
what I call the Illuminati-aspect of The Matrix Conspiracy, because science can´t be
mixed with spiritual or political concepts. If this happens, then it is not science
anymore. The same thing with relativistic and subjectivistic views of human rights;
then it is not human rights anymore.
Postmodern intellectualists are, through this use of language, often trying to get a
political agenda forced through. If you change the political terms with spiritual terms,
though, the same language is used in New Age circles. As an example is precisely
Deepak Chopra, who has invented the concept of quantum healing, which again is
based on the misunderstanding of quantum mechanics, that the mind can control
everything. Chopra is without hesitation going into discussions with experts, and is
precisely using the above-mentioned language.
On ABC's Nightline in March 2010 Deepak Chopra entered a week-long debate
against arch atheist Dr. Michael Shermer. The debate was organized as a part of
Nightline's "Face Off" event series, and was incited by a public challenge issued by
Chopra.
Joined by religious scholar Dr. Jean Houston and neuroscientist Sam Harris, the
group gathered at the California Institute of Technology to settle a long-time
argument regarding the ultimate question: Does God have a future?
The debate was heated from the get-go, with Chopra issuing a rousing appeal to his
audience of scientists and students: "One of the things we have to do is stop being the
Jihadists and Vatican of conservative, orthodox science, which is not relevant
anymore."
Shermer snapped back by claiming that Chopra's opening remarks were "the very
embodiment of woo woo," a term Shermer uses to describe what he considers
dangerous pseudoscience.
Initially, the debate centered around accusations of misrepresenting contemporary
theories of quantum physics to serve either religious or atheistic ends. Harris
7
criticized Deepak's identification of God/Nature as "infinite potentiality," calling his
interpretation "unprincipled." Chopra made the claim that Harris' conception of
science was dogmatic and closed off to alternative interpretations.
In the final days, the debate gravitated around whether spiritual experiences should be
explained in material or immaterial terms. Eventually, the debaters could not agree on
the issue of whether such experiences originate within the body or outside of it (see
my article Quantum Mysticism and Its Web of Lies and the updates in Quantum
Mysticism).
Watch the debate on the playlist of my YouTube channel
In my article The Sokal Hoax you can read more about this development.
Susan Jacoby's new book The Age of American Unreason might be viewed as a kind
of sequel to Richard Hofstadter's 1963 classic, “Anti-Intellectualism in American
Life.” A cultural history of the last forty years, The Age of American
Unreason focuses on the convergence of social forces—usually treated as separate
entities—that has created a perfect storm of anti-rationalism. These include the
upsurge of religious fundamentalism, with more political power today than ever
before; the failure of public education to create an informed citizenry; and the
triumph of video over print culture. Sparing neither the right nor the left, Jacoby
asserts that Americans today have embraced a universe of “junk thought” that makes
almost no effort to separate fact from opinion.
Combining historical analysis with contemporary observation, Susan Jacoby dissects
a new American cultural phenomenon - one that is at odds with the American
heritage of Enlightenment reason and with modern, secular knowledge and science.
With mordant wit, she surveys an anti-rationalist landscape extending from pop
culture to a pseudo-intellectual universe of "junk thought." Disdain for logic and
evidence defines a pervasive malaise fostered by the mass media, triumphalist
religious fundamentalism, mediocre public education, a dearth of fair-minded public
intellectuals on the right and the left, and, above all, a lazy and credulous public.
Jacoby offers an unsparing indictment of the American addiction to infotainment--
from television to the Web--and cites this toxic dependency as the major element
distinguishing the current age of unreason from earlier outbreaks of American anti-
intellectualism and anti-rationalism. With reading on the decline and scientific and
historical illiteracy on the rise, an increasingly ignorant public square is dominated by
debased media-driven language and received opinion.
8
At this critical political juncture, nothing could be more important than recognizing
the "overarching crisis of memory and knowledge" described in this impassioned,
tough-minded book, which challenges Americans to face the painful truth about what
the flights from reason has cost them as individuals and as a nation (see my entry on
Anti-intellectualism and Anti-science).
Jacobi is less successful, however, in explaining why, in the 21st century, Americans
remain so much more religious than the rest of the developed world, and why matters
like abortion, homosexual marriage, stem cell research and the teaching of evolution
— which are not particularly divisive in an increasingly secular Europe — have
become wedge issues in the United States. Still, educated Northerners were not
paragons of reason. Jacoby singles out their attraction to the pseudoscience of social
Darwinism in the post–Civil War period, noting that the popularity of this ideological
rationale for “untrammeled capitalism” demonstrated the susceptibility of
intellectuals to irrationalism, the confusion of sociology with hard science, and the
dangers of a little knowledge: “Many Americans possessed just enough education to
be fascinated by the late-19th-century advances in both science and technology, but
they had too little education to distinguish between real scientists and those who
peddled theories in the guise of science.” Jacoby rightly identifies pseudoscience and
religion as two “critical ingredients” of unreason since then. Indeed, they often work
in tandem: The “sciences” of mind cure and New Thought flourished, and Mary
Baker Eddy “discovered” Christian Science in the 1860s. Then came Scientology, the
“science” of positive thinking, and, more recently, New Age healer Deepak Chopra’s
nonsensical references to quantum physics.
Jacobi is a part of the Skeptic movement with Richard Dawkins as a front figure, and
she fails to see the pseudoscience of this movement, which is based on reductionism.
Reductionisms are philosophical, political, religious/occult theories, that seek
legitimacy by claiming, that they are scientific theories, while the fact is, that they
either not are testable/able to be falsified, or that they abuse the use of abductive
reasoning.
And towards this might be added that there are two versions of reductionism. This is
important since it seems that these two versions are in war with each other, as we saw
in the above-mentioned debate:
The first version for example claims that Man fully can be described and explained
with the methods of natural science. This happens in various forms of Naturalism,
Positivism and Behaviourism. It is clear that this first kind of reductionism (scientism
and pseudoskepticism) are more accepted than the second openly anti-scientific
version.
9
The second version claims, that psychology, sociology or history can give the total
and superior understanding of, what a human being is. These viewpoints are
described respectively as Psychologism, Sociologism and Historism. It is particular
this version which openly claims to be a supporter of anti-science, and accuses the
other part of being reductionistic, and demand so-called alternative sciences. This is
what we see in the popular culture of New Age.
The first version is mostly the supporter of scientism and pseudoskepticism.
Scientism is a term generally used to describe the cosmetic application of science in
unwarranted situations not covered by the scientific method.
Pseudoskepticism (or pseudoscepticism) is a term referring to a philosophical or
scientific position which appears to be that of skepticism or scientific skepticism but
which in reality fails to be so.
But both sides are examples of reductionism and are therefore examples of
pseudoscience.
Paul Kurtz, an American skeptic and secular humanist, has written that the popularity
of Chopra's views is associated with increasing anti-scientific attitudes in society, and
such popularity represents an assault on the objectivity of science itself by seeking
new, alternative forms of validation for ideas. Kurtz says that medical claims must
always be submitted to open-minded but proper scrutiny, and that skepticism "has its
work cut out for it".
In 2013, Chopra published an article on what he saw as "skepticism" at work in
Wikipedia, arguing that a "stubborn band of militant skeptics" were editing articles to
prevent what he believes would be a fair representation of the views of such figures
as Rupert Sheldrake, an author, lecturer, and researcher in parapsychology. The
result, Chopra argued, was that the encyclopedia's readers were denied the
opportunity to read of attempts to "expand science beyond its conventional
boundaries". The biologist Jerry Coyne responded, saying that it was instead Chopra
who was losing out as his views were being "exposed as a lot of scientifically-
sounding psychobabble".
More broadly, Chopra has attacked skepticism as a whole, writing in The Huffington
Post that "No skeptic, to my knowledge, ever made a major scientific discovery or
advanced the welfare of others." Astronomer Phil Plait said this statement trembled
"on the very edge of being a blatant and gross lie", listing Carl Sagan, Richard
Feynman, Stephen Jay Gould, and Edward Jenner among the "thousands of scientists
[who] are skeptics", who he said were counterexamples to Chopra's statement.
10
By the way, which major scientific discoveries have Chopra himself made? Besides
claiming that he and his fellow Matrix Sophists have made such, and that they will be
proved in the future? He hasn´t discovered quantum physics. Quantum physics was
discovered by using the same objective scientific principles, which are behind all
other major scientific discoveries; the very same scientific principles which Chopra is
attacking as examples of “old thinking.” But Chopra doesn´t even understand this
simple contradiction.
Chopra calls his own alternative science for “speculative science.” In reality it is bad
philosophy. Bad philosophy is never going to be “proved”. It´s going to be debunked.
The ideas Chopra promotes have been regularly criticized by medical and scientific
professionals as pseudoscience. This criticism has been described as ranging "from
dismissive [to] damning". For example, Robert Carroll states Chopra attempts to
integrate Ayurveda with quantum mechanics to justify his teachings. Chopra argues
that what he calls "quantum healing" cures any manner of ailments, including cancer,
through effects that he claims are literally based on the same principles as quantum
mechanics. This has led physicists to object to his use of the term quantum in
reference to medical conditions and the human body. His treatments benefit from
the placebo response, and some argue that his claims for the effectiveness of
alternative medicine can lure sick people away from medical treatments. He is placed
by David Gorski among the "quacks", "cranks" and "purveyors of woo", and
described as "arrogantly obstinate". Richard Dawkins publicly exposed Chopra,
accusing him of using "quantum jargon as plausible-sounding hocus pocus".
But Richard Dawkins is himself a reductionist and therefore a pseudoscientist
advocating his atheistic version of Social Darwinism. In connection with The Matrix
Conspiracy Fascism I have used Richard Dawkins and Ken Wilber to show two
versions of social Darwinism, which I claim is two sides of the same Matrix Coin. I
use them because they are probably the most known and respected persons.
Dawkins is using the term Meme as a name of cultural evolution. In the skeptical
movement of New Atheism you will always find a focus on evolution as more less
identical with science, though an atheist view not necessarily have anything to do
with a worship of evolutionism.
Wilber is using 5 factors, factors which he claims are the essential elements or keys
to unlocking and facilitating human [cultural] evolution.
Ken Wilber calls these 5 elements quadrants, levels, lines, states and types; that is:
quadrants of development, levels or stages of development, states of consciousness,
11
and a human personality typing system, a typology. All of these elements are, right
now available in your own awareness, he claims. These 5 elements are not merely
theoretical concepts he claims; they are aspects of your own experience, contours of
your own consciousness.
Both Dawkins and Wilber are, as Social Darwinists, ending up in reductionism. I
won´t go into an explanation here, but refer to my two articles on them: A Critique of
Richard Dawkins and the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) and A Critique of
Ken Wilber and His Integral Method. Also see my entry The Matrix Conspiracy
Fascism.
A warning signal when you are getting close to The Matrix Conspiracy Fascism is
always the expression: “The Evolution of Consciousness.” If you hear that you can be
sure that you have to do with New Age. The main problem with this expression is
that the traditional wisdom traditions always have characterized spiritual growth with
the concept of awakening. Roughly speaking you can talk about three stages of
spiritual growth: sleep, dream and awake. It hasn´t anything at all to do with
“evolution.” It´s an utterly misplaced expression. And especially not that this can
happen in collective sense. It is purely individual, and very seldom. I have explained
this several places. But you can begin with the article on Ken Wilber.
Deepak Chopra is also an advocate of the “evolution of consciousness.” Chopra
speaks and writes regularly about metaphysics, including the study of consciousness
and Vedanta philosophy. He is a philosophical idealist, arguing for the primacy of
consciousness over matter and for teleology and intelligence in nature – that mind, or
"dynamically active consciousness", is a fundamental feature of the universe (see my
The Matrix Conspiracy Updates about how philosophical idealism is the background
for the so-called Simulation theory).
In this view, consciousness is both subject and object. It is consciousness, he writes,
that creates reality; we are not "physical machines that have somehow learned to
think...[but] thoughts that have learned to create a physical machine". He argues that
the evolution of species is the evolution of consciousness seeking to express itself as
multiple observers; the universe experiences itself through our brains: "We are the
eyes of the universe looking at itself". He has been quoted as saying "Charles
Darwin was wrong. Consciousness is key to evolution and we will soon prove that."
He opposes reductionist thinking in science and medicine, arguing that we can trace
the physical structure of the body down to the molecular level and still have no
explanation for beliefs, desires, memory and creativity. But as with other New Agers
he doesn´t understand reductionism, since he himself is a blatant reductionist. In his
12
book Quantum Healing, Chopra stated the conclusion that quantum
entanglement links everything in the Universe, and therefore it must create
consciousness.
Chopra argues that everything that happens in the mind and brain is physically
represented elsewhere in the body, with mental states (thoughts, feelings, perceptions
and memories) directly influencing physiology by means of neurotransmitters such
as dopamine, oxytocin and serotonin. He has stated, "Your mind, your body and your
consciousness – which is your spirit – and your social interactions, your personal
relationships, your environment, how you deal with the environment, and your
biology are all inextricably woven into a single process … By influencing one, you
influence everything." That is: a form of quantum biology, and therefore a
reductionism.
Chopra's claims of quantum healing have attracted controversy due to what has been
described as a "systematic misinterpretation" of modern physics. Chopra's
connections between quantum mechanics and alternative medicine are widely
regarded in the scientific community as being invalid. The main criticism revolves
around the fact that macroscopic objects are too large to exhibit inherently quantum
properties like interference and wave function collapse. Most literature on quantum
healing is almost entirely theosophical, omitting the rigorous mathematics that
makes quantum electrodynamics possible (see my article The Fascism of
Theosophy).
Chopra has been described as "America's most prominent spokesman for Ayurveda".
His treatments benefit from the placebo response (see my entry on Joe Dispenza).
Chopra states "The placebo effect is real medicine, because it triggers the body's
healing system."
Chopra has metaphorically described the AIDS virus as emitting "a sound that lures
the DNA to its destruction". The condition can be treated, according to Chopra, with
"Ayurveda's primordial sound" Taking issue with this view, medical professor
Lawrence Schneiderman has said that ethical issues are raised when alternative
medicine is not based on empirical evidence and that, "to put it mildly, Dr. Chopra
proposes a treatment and prevention program for AIDS that has no supporting
empirical data".
He is placed by David Gorski among the "quacks", "cranks" and "purveyors of woo",
and described as "arrogantly obstinate". The New York Times in 2013 stated that
Deepak Chopra is "the controversial New Age guru and booster of alternative
medicine". The Time magazine stated that he is "the poet-prophet of alternative
13
medicine.” He has become one of the best-known and wealthiest figures in the
holistic-health movement. The Times argued that his publishers have used his
medical degree on the covers of his books as a way to promote the books and buttress
their claims. In 1999 Time magazine included Chopra in its list of the 20th century's
heroes and icons. The following year Mikhail Gorbachev referred to him as "one of
the most lucid and inspired philosophers of our time". Cosmo Landesman wrote in
2005 that Chopra was "hardly a man now, more a lucrative new age brand –
the David Beckham of personal/spiritual growth". A 2008 Time magazine article
by Ptolemy Tompkins commented that for most of his career Chopra had been a
"magnet for criticism", and most of it was from the medical and scientific
professionals. Opinions ranged from the "dismissive" to the "outright damning".
Chopra's claims for the effectiveness of alternative medicine can, some have argued,
lure sick people away from medical treatments. Tompkins however considered
Chopra a "beloved" individual whose basic messages centered on "love, health and
happiness" had made him rich because of their popular appeal. English professor
George O'Hara argues that Chopra exemplifies the need of human beings for meaning
and spirit in their lives, and places what he calls Chopra's "sophistries" alongside the
emotivism of Oprah Winfrey.
It would be better to consult the traditional wisdom traditions, which maybe even are
free of charge.
Related in The Matrix Dictionary:
The Matrix Conspiracy Updates
The Matrix Conspiracy Fascism
Quantum Mysticism
Richard Dawkins
Anti-intellectualism and Anti-science
Bridge between Science and Spirituality
Related articles:
The Matrix Conspiracy
14
The Fascism of Theosophy
A Critique of Ken Wilber and His Integral Method
A Critique of Richard Dawkins and the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI)
Time Travel and the Fascism of the WingMakers Project
A Critique of the Human Design System
The New Feminism and the Philosophy of Women´s Magazines
Related:
The Matrix Dictionary
All articles and books referred to are available in free PDF Versions. Links can be
found on my blog: www.MortenTolboll.blogspot.com
Copyright © 2017 by Morten Tolboll.
Terms of use:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en_US