3
34 GROUP PRACTICE JOURNAL AMGA.ORG MARCH 2016 We have all read the headlines and know that reimbursement for healthcare services is transitioning from volume to value. The relevant question that chief financial officers (CFOs) need to ask themselves and their operational team is, How do we maximize revenue in the volume-based world while we begin the transition to value-based reimbursement? Some CFOs are taking the wait-and-see approach before beginning the transi- tion. This strategy generates certainty for budgeting and projections in the near term; however, it does nothing to prepare us for the reimbursement changes just over the horizon. In fact, some of those changes are upon us now. The kind of change that needs to occur requires a major overhaul to the existing care delivery model. In short, it is significant change management. Those of us in health care know that change often happens slowly. It is not like flipping a light switch and your opera- tions team is ready to provide services that support value-based care. This transition takes significant time and a commitment by all in the organization as well as an effective plan of execution and excellent follow- through. For these reasons alone, waiting to make the transition from volume to value is flawed. But, there is an even better reason to begin the transition now. Value-based revenue is available now to facilitate the necessary transition from volume to value. Pacing Change While we can still receive reimbursement for the volume of work we do, reimbursement is also available for the value of our work. In addition to all of the traditional revenue available from volume, we can implement current reimbursement models to support a gradual transition from volume to value and still main- tain current volume-based revenue. Value-based revenue is available now to facilitate the necessary transition from volume to value. The Medicare Wellness Program is a great example of one such program. This is a program that supports improved wellness for patients—the “value” piece of the equation—through a comprehensive health risk assessment that the clinical support staff largely per- forms, with a provider reviewing the assessment with the patient for approximately 10 minutes of the entire 45-minute visit. Based on the Physician Fee Schedule, on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website, the reimbursement for the initial annual wellness visit averages $170. All subsequent annual wellness visits average $117 in reimbursement. Figure 1 illustrates the reimbursement by visit type, including a comparison to a routine office visit. CMS introduced the Medicare Wellness program 10 years ago; yet, low utilization of the service contin- ues—generally less than 15% in most markets. CMS’s expected utilization is 60%. The biggest barriers to From Volume to Value Thriving While Transitioning BY MICHELLE BURRIS, M.B.A., CMPE

Cutting-Edge Best Practices From Volume to Value from the ...ihteams.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iht-article.pdf · transition from volume to value is fl awed. But, there is an

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cutting-Edge Best Practices From Volume to Value from the ...ihteams.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iht-article.pdf · transition from volume to value is fl awed. But, there is an

34 GROUP PRACTICE JOURNAL ❘ AMGA.ORG MARCH 2016

We have all read the headlines and know that reimbursement for healthcare services is transitioning from volume to value. The relevant question that chief fi nancial offi cers (CFOs) need to ask themselves and their operational team is, How do we maximize revenue in the volume-based world while we begin the transition to value-based reimbursement? Some CFOs are taking the wait-and-see approach before beginning the transi-tion. This strategy generates certainty for budgeting and projections in the near term; however, it does nothing to prepare us for the reimbursement changes just over the horizon. In fact, some of those changes are upon us now.

The kind of change that needs to occur requires a major overhaul to the existing care delivery model. In short, it is signifi cant change management. Those of us in health care know that change often happens slowly. It is not like fl ipping a light switch and your opera-tions team is ready to provide services that support value-based care. This transition takes signifi cant time and a commitment by all in the organization as well as an effective plan of execution and excellent follow-through. For these reasons alone, waiting to make the transition from volume to value is fl awed. But, there is an even better reason to begin the transition now. Value-based revenue is available now to facilitate the necessary transition from volume to value.

Pacing Change While we can still receive reimbursement for the

volume of work we do, reimbursement is also available

for the value of our work. In addition to all of the traditional revenue available from volume, we can implement current reimbursement models to support a gradual transition from volume to value and still main-tain current volume-based revenue.

Value-based revenue is available now

to facilitate the necessary transition

from volume to value.

The Medicare Wellness Program is a great example of one such program. This is a program that supports improved wellness for patients—the “value” piece of the equation—through a comprehensive health risk assessment that the clinical support staff largely per-forms, with a provider reviewing the assessment with the patient for approximately 10 minutes of the entire 45-minute visit. Based on the Physician Fee Schedule,on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(CMS) website, the reimbursement for the initial annualwellness visit averages $170. All subsequent annualwellness visits average $117 in reimbursement.

Figure 1 illustrates the reimbursement by visit type, including a comparison to a routine offi ce visit.

CMS introduced the Medicare Wellness program 10 years ago; yet, low utilization of the service contin-ues—generally less than 15% in most markets. CMS’s expected utilization is 60%. The biggest barriers to

From Volume to ValueThriving While Transitioning

BY MICHELLE BURRIS, M.B.A., CMPE

Solutions Library

The AMGA Solutions Library highlights member best practices and other strategies for successful medical group operations in a concise format highlighting key takeaways from conferences, regional meetings, and webinars.

Sampled below are several best practice summaries from our performance improvement webinar series. These summaries are available as a complimentary benefit of AMGA membership!

Cutting-Edge Best Practices from the Healthcare Innovators

Atrius Health, Billings Clinic, and Crystal Run HealthcareStories from the ACO Journey: Strategies for Success

Aurora Health CareMaking the “Mission Possible” Possible: Primary Care Redesign

Baptist Medical GroupTurning Physicians from Cowboys into Quarterbacks

Bassett Healthcare NetworkOptimizing a Patient-Centered Approach to Primary Care

Cleveland ClinicEngaging Physicians in High-Value Health Care Tapping the Power of Patient Portals

Cornerstone Health CareQuantifying High-Cost Care and Cost Reduction

Crystal Run HealthcareFrom Volume to Value: Revisiting Physician Compensation

Dartmouth-HitchcockExpanding the Care Coordination with Pharmacy and Behavioral Health

Mayo Clinic Making CPOE Work with Partnerships A System-Wide Model for Population Health

MercyTriple Aim Teams: Guiding Population Health

Southwest Medical AssociatesPractice E�ciencies and Integration of Virtual Visits

SwedishAmerican Health SystemAssisting Patients to Manage Chronic Disease More E�ectively

Utica Park ClinicUsing Lean Six Sigma and Automation for Value-Based Care

Additionally, all webinar presentations and slides are available “on demand” for your convenience.

Visit www.amga.org to learn more!

March2016_mech.indd 34 3/9/16 12:16 PM

Page 2: Cutting-Edge Best Practices From Volume to Value from the ...ihteams.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iht-article.pdf · transition from volume to value is fl awed. But, there is an

36 GROUP PRACTICE JOURNAL x AMGA.ORG MARCH 2016

minutes with the patient reviewing the findings of the assessment and completing the plan of care, which might include discussing previously undiagnosed condi-tions (e.g., depression). Similarly, many patients are under the impression that these visits are like an annual physical, where they would typically have a physical examination, which is not a component of this service.

Figure 2 illustrates the time requirement for providers, which is typically 33% of the total visit for the Medicare Wellness visits, but 100% of the visit for routine office visits.

However, as Figure 3 illustrates, the reimbursement is considerably greater than that of a more complex routine office visit.

Providers also express concern about needing to see so many Medicare Wellness patients that there is no time in their schedule to see patients with other concerns. However, a provider needs to see only two or three patients per day to achieve the expected 60% penetration rate of eligible Medicare patients. At the rate of two–three per day, a primary care physician (PCP) generates additional revenue of between $50,000 and $70,000 annually. The revenue for these services is excellent, but there is more: Most commercial payers also offer financial incentives for closing care gaps, which is achieved through the health risk assessment, where the need for preventive services might be identi-fied. Of course, if you are part of a health system, there is the downstream revenue from any testing that is ordered as well.

Another program, sponsored by CMS and most commercial payers, which supports the transition from volume to value is the Transitions of Care (TOC) program. This program is designed to create value by improving outcomes for the transition of a patient from an acute care setting back to their home. Effective TOC can take many forms. For example, after discharge from an inpatient stay to the patient’s home, a nurse from the patient’s primary care physician office contacts the patient to review medication and other aspects of care specific to the reason for hospitalization. This is an opportunity for the care team to address any concerns that the patient has, including confusion regarding which medications to continue taking, the ones given in the hospital or the ones taken previous to the hospital stay. The nurse also discusses other restrictions/requirements for the patient such as specific dietary needs. This initial contact is critical to appropriate continued care for the patient, which keeps them from returning to the hospital. According to the CMS website, the Medicare reimburse-ment for these services is $165 or $232, depending on the medical complexity of the patient’s diagnoses. Based

FIGURE 1

Reimbursement by Visit Type

FIGURE 2

Physician Time as Percent of Total Time

FIGURE 3

Work RVU by Visit Type

utilization seem to be (1) a lack of understanding of the ability for clinical support staff to complete a significant portion of the visit and (2) a lack of understanding on the part of Medicare beneficiaries regarding the nature of services delivered at these visits. Providers have the misconception that they must perform the entire 45-minute visit, but as mentioned above, the clinical support staff such as the medical assistant is qualified to perform the health risk assessment and complete documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). Therefore, the provider generally needs to spend 10–15

March2016_mech.indd 36 3/9/16 12:17 PM

Page 3: Cutting-Edge Best Practices From Volume to Value from the ...ihteams.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iht-article.pdf · transition from volume to value is fl awed. But, there is an

MARCH 2016 AMGA.ORG x GROUP PRACTICE JOURNAL 37

on my experience as CFO, commercial payers typically reimburse TOC at a higher rate than Medicare.

The key to success with TOC is an extremely timely and effective communication plan between the inpatient care team and the ambulatory or primary care team as well as an established process in the primary care setting to contact these patients and ensure they get the follow-up and access to resources to achieve the intended results of the program. This program also requires significant operational change management because typically the PCP may not even be aware that their patient was in the hospital or emergency room; therefore, they would not know to provide appropriate follow-up as required in the guidelines for TOC. Based on my experience, this program has significance to hospitals because it is shown to be a key component in reducing avoidable hospital readmissions.

Timely ContactSpecific requirements associated with this program

include contacting the patient within three business days of discharge to work through transition issues (e.g., medication reconciliation). Medication problems are actually the most common cause for an avoidable patient readmission to the hospital. Also required to achieve a billable transition of care is a face-to-face follow-up visit with the patient’s PCP within seven days of discharge. Lastly, one additional interaction with the patient is required between day seven and 30 after discharge.

Then, a claim can be submitted to Medicare or the Medicare Advantage plan with specific TOC codes. Success in the area of TOC is manageable through effective process/change management. Similar to the Medicare Wellness program, successful TOC is a service that is largely achieved by clinical support staff. The provider’s time requirement is consistent to a typi-cal extended office visit—i.e., 20–30 minutes.

In our experience, both of these programs, when successfully implemented, have a positive impact

greater than just increased revenue. Clinical support staff report improved job satisfaction because they are working close to the top of their professional licenses and doing what they are trained to do—care for patients. Physicians are typically happy when their support staff is happy and the entire team is engaged in creating wellness for their patients from identifying previously undiagnosed conditions or confirming con-tinued good health. Most importantly, patients achieve improved outcomes, better health, and satisfaction with their care. Implementing each of these programs creates the foundation for team-based care, which is critical for success in the value-based payment environment.

Value-Based On-RampIn today’s reimbursement environment, medical

practices can continue to receive the same reimburse-ment for volume they have always received while gaining the financial and clinical benefit of new programs such as Medicare Wellness and Transitions of Care. Perhaps the most beneficial impact of these programs is that implementation of each puts medical practices on the road to value-based care or team-based care through the incremental operational transition to pay-for-value.

My team has success implementing both the Medi-care Wellness and Transitions of Care programs. In the first six months after implementation, we saw a volume increase of 178% in Medicare Wellness and over 2,000% percent in Transitions of Care. This generated an increase of $535,000 of revenue for health system-owned ambulatory practices. It also prevented hospital payment denials for avoidable readmissions as well as penalties associated with the CMS Hospital Readmis-sions Reduction Program.

Michelle J. Burris, M.B.A., CMPE, is executive vice president and chief business officer at Innovative Healthcare Teams.

March2016_mech.indd 37 3/9/16 12:17 PM