Upload
ashanti
View
26
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Culture Theory. May 2008. Chapter 2. Culture Theory (CT) Chapter 2. Impact on Safety Risk View Interaction with other Groups World View. Cultural Theory. Mary Douglas Anthropologist Observation of Societies Threats Social Structures Ways of Life Attitudes. Culture. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Culture Theory
May 2008Chapter 2
Culture Theory (CT)Chapter 2
• Impact on Safety
• Risk View
• Interaction with other Groups
• World View
Cultural Theory
• Mary Douglas
• Anthropologist
• Observation of Societies– Threats– Social Structures– Ways of Life– Attitudes
Culture
• Studied Life and Cultural Biases– Functional Explanation– Social Biases– Argued two principle axes:
• Grid and Group
Risk by Culture:
Corporate Views
Views
Cultural Theory
• Group: Degree of division between insiders and outsiders
• Grid: (Regulation) Rules that relate one individual to another
Group
Regulation
Examples
• Strong Grid /Strong Group (High)– Individuals Regulated for the sake of the
group.
– Heirarchist
Views of Nature
• Fragile
• Robust
• Capricious (Erratic, impulsive, unpredictable)
Strong Grid, Strong Group
• Roles are subscribed – gender and birth
• Positional Rules
• Groups are within larger groups
Bernstein: Two family Examples:Modern JapaneseBritish Middle-class Family
Hierarchist• Social Sectors: Classes, castes, age groups• Specialized Roles• Larger and lasts longer• Less internal conflict• Well defined rules• Experts• Reliance on rules
Tolerant within limits
Regulation
Group
Individuals
• Group (Low) Grid/Regulation (Low)– Individuals than group– Lack of group mentality– Social classes negotiable– Transaction and transfer freely– Political laws to regulate individuals– Trial and error
Egalitarian• High Group, Low Grid
• Strong bond
• Voluntary Associations
• Good of Group before individual
• Sensitive to high consequence risk
• Nature Fragile
• Small change will bring crashing down
Isolationist (fatalist)
• High Reg, Low group
• Feel isolated
• Nature as random
• Little they can do
• No respect for other groups
Random!
Hermit (Autonomous)
• Medium/Medium
• Withdraws from social interaction
• Autonomous
• Often ignored
Nature Views
Tolerant within limitsRandom!
FragileStable
Risk
• Different Levels of Risk Views– Risk Adverse– Risk Procedures (Regulation)– Risk Takers– Risk Acceptors
Risk• Culture Theory can be used to predict risk
responses
– Risk Issues– Grid Coordinates
Risk
Risk Adverse
Risk Acceptances
Risk T
aker
Risk Proce
dures
Nature
Nature Fragile
Nature Capricious
Robust
View points
Share Adverse
Fatalist
Reg
ulat
ion
GroupLow
Low
High
High
Hier.
Egal.
ISO.
Indiv.
HermitNature
High bondRisk adverse
Risk Takers
Accept authority
Weak leadership
Robust
NatureFragile
Fatalist
No respect
Glorify risk/acceptance
Reject hier. knowledge
No respect fo
r other g
roups
Deride safety cultu
re
Trend setters
Nature Robust
Nature capricious
Risk Adversion
Risk
Competition
Grid
• Coarse Grained
• Static
• Rests on hidden assumptions
• No Accounting for change
GRID EXERCISE
Mountain Utilities wants to construct a 300 Megawatt Reactor in GentleValley to supply the electrical needs of the community. This community of people has Grown to over 400,000 strong. Up to this point, the community has relied on other Power generating systems for their needs. If this was a hierarchal community, what would you expect would be their expectations? Concerns? Worries?
GRID EXERCISE #2
The thriving metropolis of Getter Done is made up mostly of EngineersAnd PhDs. They have worked together for near 20 years in all kinds of Endeavors. An overseas company in conjunction with the NASA want to Establish a new antimatter storage and transfer system to support a new space Craft. The facility will store 100 cubic meters (100 m3) of antimatter in pods Constructed of polyduranium. The leak rate of the tank is expected To be only <0.0002 kg/day.
How will the community respond?
Cultural Theory Grid
• Uses:– Predict Risk Behavior?– Individual Behavior?– How they are in cultural roles
Our Organizations
• Location on the Grid
• Definitions – what does that mean?
• Discussion.
Other Characteristics
• Individual Characteristics– Gender– Race– Political Ideology– Personality Type
Biases
• Superiority of any Group?
• Limitations of the Groups
• Accuracy of the Group
• Each as a one view?
One View
Military
IndiaJapan
HH
Sect Leaders
CommunalU.S?
Servants
Example:
Canadian Website
• Safety Management Systems– Models– Related to Grid?– View on Risk?
Risk Models
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
NuclearEnergyMarine
Transport
DNA ResearchTolerate
& Improve
Dams
Mining
ComplexityC
oupl
ing
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 Space
Flying
AbandonRestrict
Zero Risk Model
Nanotechnology
• Carcinogenic Effects• Long Term effects – Unknown• Quantum Dots• Single-wall Nanotubes • MSDSs
– Focus on materials not product
From EPA White Paper on Nanotechnology
Safety & Health Aspects of Nanotechnology
Safety & Health Aspects of Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology 2nd Generation
ESH Coverage
2001 2003 2006
3rd Gen 4th Gen
2015
Where are We?
Safety Culture Theories
ISO 9001
Risk Matrix
Basic Hazard Management
Relationships• Related to Grid
• Accountability: High /High
• Training: High
• Threat - View of nature and risk
Bow-Tie
System Risk
Thompson & Wildavsky Grid
Culture and Socialization
Risk Management Policy
Risk…
Cyclone at Myanmar•100,000 Dead
Risk…
Chilean Volcano
Application of CT
What is the response of each Culture?
Application of CT
Application of CT
Application of CT
Understanding CT
• Management Policy
• Signage
• Training
• Communication
Application
Class Exercise, Grid
• Where is your organization?
Break!
Social Amplification of Risk
Amplification
• Risk– Actual Risk– Perceived Risk– Residual Risk– Risk Abatement
Amplification
Risk Analysis
• Risk Linear?
Social Amplification of Risk
• Transfer of Information
• Social Response Mechanism
SARF
• Risk – Benefit Analysis
Bell-Wether Events
• Three Mile Island– Changed attitudes– Stricter Regulation– Public opposition (any technology)
Effects…
• Move away (Globally) from Nuclear Power
• Increased public concern on complex systems.
• Public opposition to Nuclear power
Amplification Results in:
• Economic - Move away from nuc power.
• Judicial (New laws, regulations)
• Social - Anti-nuclear groups
Other Events?
bhopal
Piper Alpha
Columbia
Other Effects:
• Attenuation of Risk– Radon– Smoking– Carcinogens
Social Amplification of Risk
• Media?
• News/Books?
• Special Interest Groups?
SARF
Elements?
Chapter 2, section 2.3.2
Event
Risk
Filter 1
Increased Increased
Filter 2
DecreaseDecrease
SARF
Risk Risk
Event
Risk
Filter 1Politics
Increased Increased
Filter 2Media
Communication
SARF
• Transfer of information about Risk
• Social Response mechanism
COMMUNICATION!
SARF
• Ripple Effect– True Risk?– Media– Politics
Four Risk Pathways
• Heuristics and Values - Simplify
• Group Relationships – influence responses
• Signal value – recognize high value
• Stigmatization – Create aversion
CT and Risk
InterpretFormulateValidate
Risk
High Signal Values
• Outcome of the risk activity/operation• Public Reaction – a measure of signal
Signals
• Radiation
• Cancer
• Fire
Debates
• Provides information
• Can cause Public Concern!
Seven Categories
• Biocidal hazards
• Persistent delay hazards
• Rare Catastrophes
• Life-threatening Common
• Global Diffuse
• Rad hazards
Basic Risk Perception Model
• BRPM, 2001
• Focuses on psychometric dimensions– Attitude, fear, worry, risk sensitivity, trust– Lifestyles, and world views.
Illustrative Interventions
• Motorists and seat-belts– Likelihood of accidents– Consequence: killed or injured in crash
Risk Takers
• Individual Differences
• Thrill seekers
• Sensation Seeking– (age, gender)
Political Approach to Risk
• Social Life
• Conflicting Goals
• Values,
• Chronic fear
Politics
• Policy: risks…
Risk Resolution
• Risk Resolution versus Risk Management
• Regulation
• Restriction
• Control
• Government Program
Regulation
European Commission Questionnaire on Directive 96/82/EC on the Control of Major Accident Hazards involving dangerous substances (SEVESO II) 2000 – 2002: United Kingdom Response
View of Risk
• Risk Management is about
• Power
• Conflicts of interest
• Political Influence
• Page 49, Text
Social-Emotional Risk
• Risk = hazard + outrage
– Cognitive side of Fear!
Risk and Technology
• Modern Technology - Ritual Sacrifice
Three Acts
• 1. Sudden – Bhopal
• 2. Science response – Thalidomide
• 3. Political – Ozone depletion, global warming
Adaptation and Risk Management
• Cost-Benefit analysis
• Behavior Adaption approach
• Risk Management Approach
Rewarding/Incentives
• Management Vigor – Continuous reminders
• Reward the bottom line.
• Reward attractiveness
• Progress safety credits
• List on Page 56