19
CTF Semi - Annual Report and Results Report December 5, 2016 Washington, DC Clean Technology Fund

CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report

December 5, 2016

Washington, DC

Clean Technology Fund

Page 2: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

CTF Semi-Annual Report

Clean Technology Fund

Page 3: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Overview

Indicative Allocation ApprovedDisbursement

TOTAL IP DPSP TFC MDB

CTF Funding (in $M) 5,804.0 5,312.5 491.5 4,962.6 3,757.1 1,664.5

Number of projects 121 102 19 100 80 61

Page 4: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

New Financing Modalities

A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund

Committee at December 2016 meeting.

Resource Availability

Due to currency exchange rate fluctuations, the amount of resources available for

commitment has decreased considerably in recent months.

A “sealed” pipeline has been agreed by the MDBs to match the available resources.

Pipeline Management and Cancellation Policy

New timeframes have been agreed for project delivery from Trust Fund Committee

approval of funding to MDB board approval.

If a project/program fails to meet the agreed timeframe, CTF resources associated with

the project would be canceled and released to the trust fund.

A deadline of June 30, 2017 has been set for submitting projects for funding approval.

Strategic Issues

Page 5: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Resource Availability

Sept 2016 Oct 2016 Change

Unrestricted Fund Balance (A) 331.73 284.5 (47.2)

Anticipated Commitments (FY17-FY21)

Program/Project Funding and MPIS Costs 801.0 800.9 (0.1)

Projected Administrative Budget 27.3 27.3 0

Total Anticipated Commitments (B) 828.3 828.3 0

Available Resources (A - B) (496.5) (543.7) (47.2)

Potential Future Resources (FY17-FY21)

Contributions Not Yet Paid 65.5 61.4 (4.1)

Release of Currency Risk Reserves 137.4 128.9 (8.5)

Projected Investment Income 18.3 59.0 40.7

Total Potential Future Resources (C) 221.1 249.3 28.2

Potential Available Resources (A - B + C) (275.4) (294.5) (19.1)

Page 6: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

IP /DPSP Country Project title MDB Region

Public/Private

CTF funding

Expected submission date

1. Sealed Pipeline

IP Colombia Sustainable Transport System (SITP) IBRD LAC Public 41 Jan-17

IP India Solar PV Generation by SECI IBRD ASIA Public 20 Jan-17

IP MENA-CSP Morocco-Phase II of Midelt or Tata IBRD AFR Public 25 Jan-17

IP MENA-CSP Morocco-Phase II of Midelt or Tata AfDB AFR Public 26 Jan-17

IP Indonesia Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy IFC ASIA Private 25 Feb-17

IP Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Program IFC ECA Private 20 Feb-17

DPSP DPSP-RegionalUtility Scale renewable energy: Regional Geothermal Project (Dominica/St. Lucia) IBRD LAC Public 20 Mar-17

DPSP DPSP-Regional Utility Scale Renewable Energy: Solar Photovoltaic Financing AfDB DPSP Private 20 Mar-17

DPSPDPSP-Regional (Nigeria) Utility Scale Renewable Energy: Solar Photovoltaic Financing AfDB DPSP Private 20 Mar-17

IP Nigeria Utility-Scale Solar PV Project AfDB AFR Private 25 Mar-17

IP Nigeria Utility-Scale Solar PV Project IBRD AFR Public 100 Mar-17

IP Nigeria Financial Intermediation for Clean Energy/Energy Efficiency IFC AFR Private 50 Mar-17

IP Egypt Wind Energy Scale Up Program (IPPs) AfDB AFR Public 49 May-17

IP Turkey SME Energy Efficiency Project IBRD ECA Public 49 May-17

2. Reserved Pipeline - contingent on movements in the Sealed Pipeline

DPSPKenya (formerly DPSP-Regional) Utility Scale renewable energy: Geothermal AfDB AFR Private 20 Jun-17

IP Nigeria Abuja Mass Transit Project AfDB AFR Public 49 Jun-17

3. Inactive Pipeline

IP Chile Renewable Energy Self-Supply and Energy Efficiency IFC LAC Private 25 n.a.

IP Egypt Egypt Urban Transport IBRD AFR Public 50 n.a.

IP Egypt Egypt Urban Transport IBRD AFR Public 49 n.a.

IP Kazakhstan District heating Energy Efficiency ADB ECA Public 50 n.a.

IP MENA-CSP Jordan CSP/CPV Project - 100MW IFC ME Private 50 n.a.

IP Philippines Solar Energy Development IFC ASIA Private 20 n.a.

Remaining CTF Pipeline

Page 7: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Trends in Funding Approval

January 1 - June 30, 2016

TFC Approved

8 projects, USD 424 million

MDB Approved

4 projects, USD 214 million 0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Fundin

g (U

SD

Mill

ion)

Pipeline Allocations (cumulative) TFC Approvals (cumulative)

MDB Approvals (cumulative)

Page 8: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Co-financing by Source & Ratio

Page 9: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

CTF Portfolio Analysis

Energy

Efficiency

14%

Renewable

Energy

69%

Renewable

Energy/Energy

Efficiency

6%

Transport

11%

By sector

Geothermal

18%Hydropower

3%

Mixed

16%Solar

48%

Waste

to

Energy

1% Wind

14%

By renewable energy

AFR

26%

ASIA

35%

ECA

18%LAC

18%

DPSP-Regional

3%

Share by region

Page 10: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Trend in Disbursement

20% 20%

30%

30%

38%

45%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Dis

burs

em

ent

Rat

e

Fundin

g (in U

SD

mill

ion)

Cumulative Approvals Cumulative Disbursement Disbursement rate

Page 11: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

CTF Results Report

Clean Technology Fund

Page 12: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

AFR

30%

ASIA

29%

ECA

20%

LAC

18%

DPSP

3%

Projects under Implementation

The 2016 results report is based on 71 projects reporting results.

Energy Efficiency

15%

Renewable

Energy

66%

Renewable

Energy/Energy

Efficiency

5%

Transport

14%

Geotherm

al

17%

Other/Mix

22%

Solar

38%

Wind

19%

Hydro

4%

Page 13: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

- (Energy savings) Target ANNUAL

- (GHG reductions/ Co-financing/ Installed capacity) Targets CUMULATIVE

- (m-PPD) Million passengers per day UPON IMPLEMENTATION

Overall Results Achieved

31

15

3340

0.17

3591

1043

38

16875

4.9

10313

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

GHG reductions

(MtCO2/lifetime)

Co-financing ($B)

Installed capacity (MW)

Additional passengers (m-PPD)

Energy savings (GWh/yr)

Page 14: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Breakdown of Results Achieved

Energy

Efficiency

14%

Renewable

Energy

43%

Renewable

Energy/Energy

Efficiency

41%

Transport

2%

GHG reductions

by source

MDB

31%

Government

15%

Private

26%

Bilateral

12%

Other

16%

Co-financing

by source

Wind

45%

Solar

22%

Hydro

23%

Geothermal

9%

Other/

Mix

1%

Installed capacity

by source

Page 15: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

CTF investments are resulting in co-benefits across a range of areas and include:

• $283M in avoided local air pollution

• 9244 new jobs created

Co-Benefits of CTF Projects

Page 16: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Cross-cutting Themes

Clean Technology Fund

Page 17: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

The CTF portfolio was reviewed to identify program progress regarding gender “quality

at entry.”

The three scorecard indicators related to the presence of sector-specific gender

analysis, gender-disaggregated indicators, and women-specific activities were reviewed

for each project.

Sector-specific gender analysis was undertaken in 75 percent of CTF projects approved

in the reporting period (compared to a baseline on June 30, 2014 of 21 percent, and 40

percent in the last reporting period).

Gender-disaggregated indicators were present in 38 percent of CTF projects

(compared to a baseline of 15 percent, and 30 percent in the last period).

Three-quarters of CTF projects had planned specific activities aimed at women

(compared to a baseline of 17 percent, and a rate of 25 percent in the last period).

Gender Analysis

Page 18: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

Energy Efficiency

Analytical work being undertaken to better understand the effective use of public finance,

particularly concessional climate finance provided through the CTF, in scaling up investment

in energy efficiency.

Gender

EBRD has prepared a toolkit which synthesizes best practices and key entry points for

gender in energy efficiency in district heating.

ADB has completed a gender review of its CIF portfolio across the CTF, PPCR, and SREP.

CIF Administrative Unit is preparing sector-specific guidance notes in sectors ranging from

energy, to sustainable forest management, to agriculture.

A note on gender and renewable energy livelihoods is being prepared by CIF Administrative

Unit for final publication by December 2016.

Knowledge and Learning

Page 19: CTF Semi-Annual Report and Results Report · New Financing Modalities A proposal for CTF 2.0 has been developed for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee at December 2016 meeting

www.climateinvestmentfunds.org

@CIF_Action

https://www.youtube.com/user/CIFaction

https://www.flickr.com/photos/cifaction/sets

Zhihong Zhang, Ph.D.

Senior Program Coordinator

CTF and SREP

[email protected]

(202) 473-9852