2
88 90 92 94 96 98 Rodriguez 6 24 months Atwell 5 26 months Littrup 4 19 months 92% Follow-up Efficacy 94% 98% Local Tumor Control (%) Cryotherapy has unique radiographic conspicuity of the ablation zone 1 • Distinct iceball visibility 2 • Image guidance (ultrasound, CT or MRI) provides direct control of the location and size of the iceball • Real time monitoring of the ablation zone 2 optimizes adequate tissue coverage and avoids damage to adjacent structures The ablation zone is controllable and predictable with cryotherapy • Multiple needle placement to fully cover the tumor 3 • Simultaneous needle activation 3 Cryotherapy has excellent patient outcomes • Local tumor control after a single treatment 4, 5, 6 • Durability with low incidence of tumor recurrence 5 • Demonstrated 95% effectiveness in targeted tumors 6 • Excellent safety and efficacy profiles 3, 7, 8 • Nephron-sparing treatment 9, 10 with no impact on post ablative renal function 11 • Low risk of metastatic progression 12, 13 Cryotherapy can be used to treat a range of tumor sizes and difficult locations 3, 14 • Cryotherapy zone is well demarcated 3 • Iceball visibility for intraprocedural control and monitoring 1, 2, 3 • Multiple tumors can be treated in one session 15 Cryotherapy has low complication rates • Rate of clinically important complications (CTCAE ≥ 3) following RCC cryotherapy is low 4, 5, 6 Images courtesy of David J. Breen, MD, Clinical Radiology Department, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK Cryotherapy a therapeutic option for renal cell carcinoma Rodriguez 6 Atwell 5 Littrup 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 iguez 6 Rodri ll 5 Atw Littrup p 4 RCC Cryotherapy Complications CTCAE ≥ 3 6% 3% 7% Percentage of Patients

Cryotherapy - MML-Medical€¦ · 5. AtwellTD, Callstrom MR, Farrell MA, et al. Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation: Local Control at Mean 26 Months of Followup. J Urol 2010; 184: 1291-1295

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cryotherapy - MML-Medical€¦ · 5. AtwellTD, Callstrom MR, Farrell MA, et al. Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation: Local Control at Mean 26 Months of Followup. J Urol 2010; 184: 1291-1295

88

90

92

94

96

98

Rodriguez6 24 months

Atwell5 26 months

Littrup4 19 months

92%

Follow-up

E�cacy

94%

98%

Loca

l Tum

or C

ontr

ol (%

)

Cryotherapy has unique radiographic conspicuity of the ablation zone1 • Distincticeballvisibility2• Imageguidance(ultrasound,CTorMRI)providesdirectcontrolofthelocationandsizeoftheiceball• Realtimemonitoringoftheablationzone2optimizesadequatetissuecoverageandavoidsdamagetoadjacentstructures

The ablation zone is controllable and predictable with cryotherapy•Multipleneedleplacementtofullycoverthetumor3• Simultaneousneedleactivation3

Cryotherapy has excellent patient outcomes• Localtumorcontrolafterasingletreatment4,5,6• Durabilitywithlowincidenceoftumorrecurrence5

• Demonstrated95%effectivenessintargetedtumors6• Excellentsafetyandefficacyprofiles3,7,8• Nephron-sparingtreatment9,10withnoimpactonpostablativerenalfunction11

• Lowriskofmetastaticprogression12,13

Cryotherapy can be used to treat a range of tumor sizes and difficult locations3,14

• Cryotherapyzoneiswelldemarcated3• Iceballvisibilityforintraproceduralcontrolandmonitoring1,2,3

•Multipletumorscanbetreatedinonesession15

Cryotherapy has low complication rates• Rateofclinicallyimportantcomplications(CTCAE≥3)followingRCCcryotherapyislow4,5,6

ImagescourtesyofDavid J. Breen, MD,ClinicalRadiologyDepartment,SouthamptonUniversityHospital,Southampton,UK

Cryotherapya therapeutic option for

renal cell carcinoma

Rodriguez6Atwell5 Littrup4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

iguez6Rodrill5AtwLittrupp4

RCC Cryotherapy Complications CTCAE ≥ 3

6%

3%

7%

Per

cent

age

of P

atie

nts

Page 2: Cryotherapy - MML-Medical€¦ · 5. AtwellTD, Callstrom MR, Farrell MA, et al. Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation: Local Control at Mean 26 Months of Followup. J Urol 2010; 184: 1291-1295

Indications for UseThe Galil Medical Cryoablation Systems are intended for cryoablative destruction of tissue during surgical procedures; various Galil Medical ancillary products are required to perform these procedures. Galil Medical Cryoablation Systems are indicated for use as a cryosurgical tool in the fields of general surgery, dermatology, neurology (including cryoanalgesia), thoracic surgery, ENT, gynecology, oncology, proctology and urology. These Systems are designed to destroy tissue (including prostate and kidney tissue, liver metastases, tumors, and skin lesions) by the application of extremely cold temperatures.

A full list of specific indications can be found in the Galil Medical Cryoablation System User Manuals.

Contraindications There are no known contraindications.

Warnings / Precautions / Adverse EventsA thorough understanding of the technical principles, clinical applications, and risks associated with cryoablation procedures is necessary before using Galil Medical products to conduct cryoablation. Use of such products should be restricted to use by or under the supervision of physicians trained in cryoablation procedures with a Galil Medical Cryoablation System.

A full list of the warnings, precautions, and adverse events can be found by referencing the respective device Instructions for Use document or Cryoablation System User Manual.

only

Cryotherapy is a minimally invasive procedure, with multiple benefits:• Lessbloodlossversussurgery10,11,16

• Shorthospitalstay10,11,17

• Shortrecoverytime10

• Lowmorbidityforrapidreturntoeverydaylife10

•Maybesuitableforpatientswhocannottolerategeneralanesthesia18,19

There is minimal intraprocedural pain with cryotherapy• LowerdoseofanalgesicsneededwithcryotherapythanwhenperformingRFablation19

• Increasedpotentialforprocedurecompletionaspatientscantoleratetheprocedure19• Canbeperformedunderconscioussedation4versusgeneralanesthesia

www.galilmedical.com

©2013GalilMedical,Inc.|MUC12-IVR198-03|Sept.2013

Galil Medical Inc.4364RoundLakeRoad

ArdenHills,MN55112

USA

Tel: +16512875000

+18776392796

Galil Medical Ltd.TavorBuilding1

Yokneam

Israel2069203

Tel:+972(4)9093200

References 1. BreenDJ,RailtonNJ.MinimallyInvasiveTreatmentofSmallRenalTumors:TrendsinRenalCancerDiagnosisandManagement.CardiovascInterventRadiol2010;33:896-908. 2. CorneliusF,BalageasP,LeBrasY,etal.Radiologically-guidedthermalablationofrenaltumours.DiagIntervImaging2012;93:246-261. 3. TatliS,AcarM,TuncaliK,etal.Percutaneouscryoablationtechniquesandclinicalapplications.DiagIntervRadiol2010;16:90-95. 4. LittrupPJ,AhmedA,AounHD,etal.CT-guidedPercutaneousCryotherapyofRenalMasses.JVascInterv2007;18:383-392. 5. AtwellTD,CallstromMR,FarrellMA,etal.PercutaneousRenalCryoablation:LocalControlatMean26MonthsofFollowup.JUrol2010;184:1291-1295. 6. RodriguezR,CizmanZ,HongK,etal.ProspectiveAnalysisoftheSafetyandEfficacyofPercutaneousCryoablationforpT1NxMxBiopsy-ProvenRenalCellCarcinoma.CardiovascInterventRadiol2011;34:573-578. 7. GuazzoniG,CestariA,BuffiN,etal.OncologicResultsofLaparoscopicRenalCryoablationforclinicalT1aTumors:8YearsofExperienceinaSingleInstitution.Urol2010;76(3):624-629. 8. AronM,KamoiK,RemerE,etal.LaparoscopicRenalCryoablation:8-Year,SingleSurgeonOutcomes.JUrol2010;183:889-895. 9. LucasSM,CadedduJA.TheImportanceofNephron-SparingFocalTherapy:RenalFunctionPreservation.JEndourol2010;24(5):769-774. 10. GoyalJ,SidanaA,GeorgiadesCS,etal.RenalFunctionandOncologicOutcomesafterCryoablationorPartialNephrectomyforTumorsinSolitaryKidneys.KorJUrol2011;52:384-389. 11. MuesAD,LandmanJ.Resultsofkidneytumorcryoablation:renalfunctionpreservationandoncologicefficacy.WorldJUrol2010;28(5):567-570. 12. SchmitGD,ThompsonRH,KurupAN.Percutaneouscryoablationofsolitarysporadicrenalcellcarcinomas.BJUIntl2012;doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11230.x. 13. KunkleDA,UzzoRG.CryoablationorRadiofrequencyAblationoftheSmallRenalMass,AMeta-analysis.Cancer2008;113(10):2671-2680. 14. RosenbergMD,KinCY,TsivianM,etal.PercutaneousCryoablationofRenalLesionsWithRadiographicIceBallInvolvementoftheRenalSinus:AnalysisofHemorrhagicandCollectingSystemComplications.AmJRoentgenol2011;196(4):935-939. 15. DeCastroGJ,GuptaM,BadaniK,etal.SynchronousCryoablationofMultipleRenalLesions:Short-termFollow-upofPatientOutcomes.Urol2010;75:303-306. 16. HaramisG,GraversenJA,MuesAD,etal.RetrospectiveComparisonofLaparoscopicPartialNephrectomyVersusLaparoscopicRenalCryoablationforSmall(<3.5cm)CorticalRenalMasses.JLapAdvSurgTech2012;LaparoendoscAdvSurgTech

2012;22(2):152-157. 17. HaberGP,LeeMC,CrouzetS,etal.TumorinSolitaryKidney:LaparoscopicPartialNephrectomyvsLaparoscopicCryoablation.BJUIntl2012;109(1):118-124. 18. GuptaA,AllafME,KavoussiLR,etal.ComputerizedTomographyGuidedPercutaneousRenalCryoablationwiththePatientUnderConsciousSedation:InitialClinicalExperience.JUrol2006;175:447-453. 19. AllafME,VarkarakisIM,BhayaniSB,etal.PainControlRequirementsforPercutaneousAblationofRenalTumors:CryoablationversusRadiofrequencyAblation–InitialObservations.Radiol2005;237:366-370.