48
COST 06

COST 06 - Aarhus Universitet

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

COST 06

Electron driven

reactions in biosystems

Eugen Illenberger

and coworkers

Institut fuer Chemie und Biochemie

Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie

Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „TIFF (LZW)“

benötigt.

Radiation Damage

Cancer Therapy

Electron driven rections

Interaction of Radiation with Biological Matter (Water)

0 5 10 15 20 25 300,0

0,1

Sec

onda

ry E

lect

ron

Dis

tribu

tion

Electron Energy (eV)

V. Cobut et al. Rad. Phys.Chem. 51, 229 (1998)

H2O → H2O* → H + OH

H2O → H2O+ + e-

Ionization

Excitation

Attachment

e-aqu

H+ + OH

104 electronsper 1 Mevprimary quanta

Sanche a.c. Science, 287 (2000) 1659

Plasmid DNA

Léon Sanche et al., PRL 93 (2004) 068101

Single strand breaksPlasmid DNA

Hydrogen loss from gas phase T

Léon Sanche et al.PRL 93 (2004) 068101

Molecular mechanisms for direct damage of DNA by low energy electrons

Operation of a radiosensitiser

Subexcitation energies (< 3eV) SSBs

Higher Energies (< 5eV): DSBs and SSBs

Guanine C5N5H5O: 78 electrons

ElectronMonochromator

Molecular Beam

Quadrupole

Faraday Cup

StagnationChamber

Skimmer

Detector

Nozzle

Computer

Laser (IR, UV)

e- + M → M-# → R + X-

EA(T-H) ≈ 3 - 4 eV

Sascha Gohlke et al.PRL 92 (2004) 168103

Thymine:

e-+T→T-# → (T-H)-+ H

�� � ��

DissociationAutodetachment

��

��

ResonantCapture

Thymine

Deuterated Thymine

(M-H)- but no (M-D)-

⇒ H loss from N sites

PRL 92 (2004) 168103

Capture of electrons at subexcitation energies

Bond selective decompositions: σ*(C-I) MOs

Site selective decompositions

Gas Phase

µ

Dipole moment: µ(T) ≈ 4.5 D

+

1

3

6

+ -

e-

Dipole-bound state

µ ≥ 2 D

Paul Burrow et al. Phys. Rev. Letters 92 (2004) 068102

Dipole supported vibrational Feshbach resonance

0 1 2 3 40

2

4

6

8

10

12C

ross

sect

ion

(Å2 )

Electron energy (eV)

π*

1

3

DB state

T-A Pairing

1 eV

1.8 eV

R. Barrios, P Skurski and J. Simons, JPC B 106 (2002) 7991

Simons et al. JACS 126 (2004) 6441.

No transfer of excess chargeinitially localised on T

• H. A.Carime et al., Chem. Phys. Letters 387 (2004) 267.• S. Ptasinska et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (in print).

1.8 eV

Ribose: equilibrium in liquid phase

Thermal evaporation: pyranosyl form in gas phase (Guler, Yu, Kentämaa, JPC 106 (2002) 6754)

Electron Interaction with Deoxyribose: S. Ptasinska, S. Denifl, P. Scheier, T. D. Märk, J. Chem. Phys. 120 (2004) 8505

M: Ribose 150 amu (C5H10O5) ⇒ 132amu/114 amu13C ribose 151 amu ⇒ 133amu/115 amu(C1-D) ribose 151 amu ⇒ 133amu/115 amu ⇒ no H2O loss from C1

(M-H2O)-

(M-2H2O)-

C4H5O3- + CO2 + H2 + H

C4H6O3- + CO2 + H2

⇒ selective excision of C5 ⇒ C1 and D remain on negative ion

Ilko Bald, Janina Kopyra, EI, submitted

C4H4O2- + CO2 + CH3OH + H2

Excision of 2 C containing units ⇒ C5 and D remain on negative ion fragment

Ilko Bald, Janina Kopyra, EI, submitted

Ilko Bald, Janina Kopyra, EI, submitted

HCOO- appears as DCOO- or H13C1OO-

Excision of DNA Base

Strand break

• No transfer of excess electrons from NBs to the backbone

• Sugar unit is very sensitive

• Phosphate group is sensitive

Respond of the Hydrogen Bridge?

1 eV

1.8 eV

HCOOH formic acid

Cluster Experiments(Supersonic beam)

CF3COOH / CF3COOD

• strong enhancement of electron capture cross section

• chemical reactions induced at very low energy

• No transfer of excess electrons from NBs to the backbone

• Sugar unit is very sensitive

• Phosphate group is sensitive

• Hydrogen bridge is sensitive

⇒Molecular mechanism(s) for strand breaks not yet clear

Subexcitation energies:

Bond-selective abstraction

of H- from thymine

S. Ptasinska, S. Denifl et al.

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 2

(Innsbruck-Berlin)

D/eV

N1-H 4.4N3-H 5.8CH2-H 4,5C6-H 4.9

EA(H)=0.75 eV

S. Ptasinska, S. Denifl et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (in print).

(A-CN)-

CN- / C=CH2-

e- + T → T-# → (M-H)- + H

Quantum Chemistry Quantum Chemistry

Scattering Calculation

(F. Gianturco)

Hybridization

Tihomir Solomun et al. Eur. J. Physics D 35 (2005) 437.

Tilmann Märk, Paul Scheier, Universität InnsbruckRoger Azria, Université Paris Sud, OrsayNigel Mason, UCL London/ Open U. Milton KeynesStefan Matejcik, Michal Stano, Jan D. Skalny, Comenius University, BratislavaMichael Huels, Léon Sanche, Université de Sherbrooke, QuébecE. Krishnakumar, S.V. K. Kumar, Tata Institute, BombayAlexei Khrapak, Boris Smirnov, Dmitry Zhukhovitskii, Russian Academy of ScienceFranco Gianturco, Rome

Sascha Gohlke Janina KopyraRichard Balog Andrzej RosaJudith Langer Tibor SedlackoEsther Fischbach Constanze KönigIlko Bald Tomas SkalickyIsabel Martin Michal StanoHassan Abdoul-Carime Tihomir SolomunWerner F. Schmidt Jessica ScheikeMario Orzol

FU Berlin

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)European Union (EPIC, COST, EIPAM)Volkswagen StiftungBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit (BMWA)INNOVENT Jena

Alexander-von-Humboldt-StiftungDeutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD)

Freie Universität Berlin

NATO Research Council