29
6 - 1 Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights res 6 Chapter Training Evaluation

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 1 6 6 Chapter Training Evaluation

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

6 - 1

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

66Chapter

Training EvaluationTraining Evaluation

6 - 2

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

ObjectivesObjectivesAfter reading this chapter, you should be able to:After reading this chapter, you should be able to:

1. Explain why evaluation is important.

2. Identify and choose outcomes to evaluate a training program.

3. Discuss the process used to plan and implement a good training evaluation.

4. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different evaluation designs.

6 - 3

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Objectives Objectives (continued)(continued)

5. Choose the appropriate evaluation design based on the characteristics of the company and the importance and purpose of the training.

6. Conduct a cost-benefit analysis for a training program.

6 - 4

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

IntroductionIntroduction

Walgreen Company wanted to determine if the time, money, and effort devoted to training technicians actually made a difference.It was interested in assessing the

effectiveness of the training program.

6 - 5

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction Introduction (continued)(continued)

Training effectivenessTraining effectiveness refers to the benefits that the company and the trainees receive from training.

Training outcomes or criteriaTraining outcomes or criteria refer to measures that the trainer and the company use to evaluate training programs.

Training evaluationTraining evaluation refers to the process of collecting the outcomes needed to determine if training is effective.

Evaluation designEvaluation design refers to from whom, what, when, and how information needed for determining the effectiveness of the training program will be collected.

6 - 6

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reasons for Evaluating TrainingReasons for Evaluating Training

Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage.

Training investment is increasing because learning creates knowledge which differentiates between those companies and employees who are successful and those who are not.

6 - 7

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reasons for Evaluating Training Reasons for Evaluating Training (continued)(continued)

Because companies have made large dollar investments in training and education and view training as a strategy to be successful, they expect the outcomes or benefits related to training to be measurable.

6 - 8

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Training evaluation involves:Training evaluation involves:

Formative evaluation –Formative evaluation – evaluation conducted to improve the training process.

Summative evaluation –Summative evaluation – evaluation conducted to determine the extent to which trainees have changed as a result of participating in the training program.

6 - 9

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Why Should A Training Program Be Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated?Evaluated? To identify the program’s strengths and

weaknesses. To assess whether content, organization, and

administration of the program contribute to learning and the use of training content on the job.

To identify which trainees benefited most or least from the program.

6 - 10

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Why Should A Training Program Be Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated? Evaluated? (continued)(continued)

To gather data to assist in marketing training programs.

To determine the financial benefits and costs of the programs.

To compare the costs and benefits of training versus non-training investments.

To compare the costs and benefits of different training programs to choose the best program.

6 - 11

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Evaluation ProcessThe Evaluation Process

Conduct a Needs Analysis

Develop Measurable Learning Outcomes

Develop Outcome Measures

Choose an Evaluation Strategy

Plan and Execute the Evaluation

6 - 12

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Training Outcomes: Kirkpatrick’s Four-Training Outcomes: Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Framework of Evaluation CriteriaLevel Framework of Evaluation Criteria

LevelLevel CriteriaCriteria FocusFocus

1 Reactions Trainee satisfaction

2 Learning Acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitudes, behavior

3 Behavior Improvement of behavior on the job

4 Results Business results achieved by trainees

6 - 13

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Programs:Programs:

Cognitive Outcomes Skill-Based

Outcomes

Affective Outcomes

ResultsReturn on

Investment

6 - 14

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Programs: Programs: (continued)(continued)

Cognitive OutcomesCognitive OutcomesDetermine the degree to which trainees are familiar

with the principles, facts, techniques, procedures, or processes emphasized in the training program.

Measure what knowledge trainees learned in the program.

Skill-Based OutcomesSkill-Based OutcomesAssess the level of technical or motor skills. Include acquisition or learning of skills and use of

skills on the job.

6 - 15

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Programs: Programs: (continued)(continued)

Affective OutcomesAffective Outcomes Include attitudes and motivation.Trainees’ perceptions of the program including the

facilities, trainers, and content. ResultsResults

Determine the training program’s payoff for the company.

6 - 16

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Programs: Programs: (continued)(continued)

Return on Investment (ROI)Comparing the training’s monetary benefits with

the cost of the training.Direct costsIndirect costsBenefits

6 - 17

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How do you know if your outcomes are How do you know if your outcomes are good?good?

Good training outcomes need to be:RelevantReliableDiscriminatePractical

6 - 18

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Good Outcomes: RelevanceGood Outcomes: Relevance

Criteria relevance –Criteria relevance – the extent to which training programs are related to learned capabilities emphasized in the training program.

Criterion contamination –Criterion contamination – extent that training outcomes measure inappropriate capabilities or are affected by extraneous conditions.

Criterion deficiency – failure to measure training outcomes that were emphasized in the training objectives.

6 - 19

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Criterion deficiency, relevance, and Criterion deficiency, relevance, and contamination:contamination:

Relevance

Outcomes Identified by Needs Assessment and Included in Training Objectives

Outcomes Measured in Evaluation

DeficiencyContamination

Outcomes Related to Training Objectives

6 - 20

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Good Outcomes Good Outcomes (continued)(continued)

Reliability –Reliability – degree to which outcomes can be measured consistently over time.

Discrimination –Discrimination – degree to which trainee’s performances on the outcome actually reflect true differences in performance.

Practicality –Practicality – refers to the ease with which the outcomes measures can be collected.

6 - 21

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Evaluation Designs: Threats to ValidityEvaluation Designs: Threats to Validity

Threats to validityThreats to validity refer to a factor that will lead one to question either:The believability of the study results

(internal validity)(internal validity), orThe extent to which the evaluation results

are generalizable to other groups of trainees and situations (external validity)(external validity)

6 - 22

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Threats to ValidityThreats to Validity

Threats To Internal ValidityCompanyPersonsOutcome Measures

Threats To External ValidityReaction to pretestReaction to evaluation Interaction of selection and training Interaction of methods

6 - 23

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Methods to Control for Threats to ValidityMethods to Control for Threats to Validity

Pre- and Posttests

Use of Comparison Groups

Random Assignment

6 - 24

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Types of Evaluation DesignsTypes of Evaluation Designs

Posttest – only

Pretest / posttest

Posttest – only with Comparison group

Pretest / posttest with Comparison group

Time series

Time series with Comparison group and Reversal

Solomon Four – group

6 - 25

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Factors That Influence the Type of Factors That Influence the Type of Evaluation DesignEvaluation Design

FactorFactor How Factor Influences Type of Evaluation DesignHow Factor Influences Type of Evaluation Design

Change potential Can program be modified?

Importance Does ineffective training affect customer service, product development, or relationships between employees?

Scale How many trainees are involved?

Purpose of training Is training conducted for learning, results, or both?

Organization culture Is demonstrating results part of company norms and expectations?

Expertise Can a complex study be analyzed?

Cost Is evaluation too expensive?

Time frame When do we need the information?

6 - 26

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Importance of Training Cost InformationImportance of Training Cost Information

To understand total expenditures for training, including direct and indirect costs.

To compare costs of alternative training programs.

To evaluate the proportion of money spent on training development, administration, and evaluation as well as to compare monies spent on training for different groups of employees.

To control costs.

6 - 27

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

To calculate return on investment (ROI), To calculate return on investment (ROI), follow these steps:follow these steps:

1. Identify outcome(s) (e.g., quality, accidents)

2. Place a value on the outcome(s)

3. Determine the change in performance after eliminating other potential influences on training results.

4. Obtain an annual amount of benefits (operational results) from training by comparing results after training to results before training (in dollars)

6 - 28

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

To calculate return on investment (ROI), To calculate return on investment (ROI), follow these steps: follow these steps: (continued)(continued)

5. Determine training costs (direct costs + indirect costs + development costs + overhead costs + compensation for trainees)

6. Calculate the total savings by subtracting the training costs from benefits (operational results)

7. Calculate the ROI by dividing benefits (operational results) by costs.

The ROI gives you an estimate of the dollar return expected from each dollar invested in training.

6 - 29

Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Example of Return on InvestmentExample of Return on Investment

Industry Training Program ROI

Bottling company Workshops on managers’ roles 15:1

Large commercial bank Sales training 21:1

Electric & gas utility Behavior modification 5:1

Oil company Customer service 4.8:1

Health maintenance organization

Team training 13.7:1