63
Contribution of Plant Mineral Nutrition to Global Food Security Philip J. White Environment Plant Interactions Programme at SCRI UWA Institute of Agriculture, 1 st February 2011

Contribution of Plant Mineral Nutrition to Global Food ... · Plant Mineral Nutrition • The study of how plants obtain, distribute, metabolize, and utilise mineral nutrients •

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Contribution of Plant Mineral Nutrition to Global Food Security

    Philip J. White

    Environment Plant InteractionsProgramme at SCRI

    UWA Institute of Agriculture, 1st February 2011

  • Babylonian Proverb

    A man who has food has many problems

    A man who has no food has only one

    UWA Institute of Agriculture, 1st February 2011

  • Outline of Talk

    • Plant Mineral Nutrition

    Principles of Plant Mineral NutritionA Short History of Mineral Fertilisers

    • Food Security

    Challenge 1 – Sufficient FoodChallenge 2 – Nutritious FoodChallenge 3 – Safe Food

    • Can We Achieve Food Security?

  • Plant Nutritional Requirements

    • Plants are capable of making all necessary organic compounds from inorganic compounds and elements in the environment (autotrophic)

    • They are supplied with all the carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen they need as CO2 and H2O

    • All other elements must be obtained (often) from the soil solution by roots

  • Plant Mineral Nutrition

    • The study of how plants obtain, distribute, metabolize, and utilise mineral nutrients

    • Mineral: An inorganic element

    • Nutrient: A substance needed for survival or necessary for the synthesis of organic compounds

  • White & Brown (2010) Ann. Bot. 105: 1073-1080

    Essential Mineral ElementsRequired for plant growth and/or reproduction

    Cannot be replaced by another element

    Have unique physiological or biochemical roles

    Essential & Beneficial Elements

  • Essential Elements – Deficiencies & Toxicities

    White & Brown (2010) Ann. Bot. 105: 1073-1080

    Essentiality Critical Leaf Concentrations (mg g-1 DM)Element Plant Animal Sufficiency ToxicityNitrogen (N) yes yes 15 - 40Potassium (K) yes yes 5 - 40 > 50Phosphorus (P) yes yes 2 - 5 > 10Calcium (Ca) yes yes 0.5 - 10 > 100Magnesium (Mg) yes yes 1.5 - 3.5 > 15Sulphur (S) yes yes 1.0 - 5.0Chlorine (Cl) yes yes 0.1 - 6.0 4.0 - 7.0Boron (B) yes suggested 5-100 x 10-3 0.1 - 1.0Iron (Fe) yes yes 50-150 x 10-3 > 0.5Manganese (Mn) yes yes 10-20 x 10-3 0.2 - 5.3Copper (Cu) yes yes 1-5 x 10-3 15-30 x 10-3Zinc (Zn) yes yes 15-30 x 10-3 100-300 x 10-3Nickel (Ni) yes suggested 0.1 x 10-3 20-30 x 10-3Molybdenum (Mo) yes yes 0.1-1.0 x 10-3 1

    Sodium (Na) beneficial yes - 2-5Selenium (Se) beneficial yes - 10-100 x 10-3Cobalt (Co) beneficial yes - 10-20 x 10-3Iodine (I) - yes - 1-20 x 10-3

  • Plant Mineral Nutrition and Crop YieldLiebig’s Law of The Minimum

    Crop yield is determined bya critical input that is inshort supply: the limitingfactor. This is often N.

    Inputs that do not correctthe limiting factor aregenerally ineffective inincreasing yield.

  • Essential Mineral Elements

    P=200 kg/ha, K=100 kg/ha

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    0 100 200 300 400 500N fertiliser (kg/ha)

    DM

    yie

    ld (t

    /ha)

    N=500 kg/ha, K=100kg/ha

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    0 50 100 150 200P fertiliser (kg/ha)

    DM y

    ield

    (t/h

    a)

    N=500kg/ha, P=200kg/ha

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    0 50 100 150 200K fertiliser (kg/ha)

    DM y

    ield

    (t/h

    a)White et al. (2006) In: Potato Biology and Biotechnology,

    Advances and Perspectives, pp.739-752

    Responses in potato yields to N, P and K fertilisation predicted by simulation models (http://www.qpais.co.uk/)

    nitrogen phosphorus potassium

  • Soil Fertilisers are Ancient History

    Crop production began

    Ancient Chinese using organic manures

    Ancient Greeks and Romans using animal manures, composts, bones, plant ash (potash), seaweed, saltpeter (potassium nitrate) as fertilisers, and liming materials to correct soil acidity

    Egyptians and Mesopotamians using river silt

    10,000 1,000 100 10 1 0years before present

    Chemical fertiliser industry began about 250 years ago…

    Nitric acid 1771

    Chilean Nitrate 1830Ammonium sulphate (from coal) 1830Superphosphate 1842

    Nitrogen from the air 1911

  • Nitrogen from the Air (1911)

    The Haber-Bosch process, is the production of ammonia from nitrogen and hydrogen gases over an enriched iron or ruthenium catalyst.

    The Haber-Bosch process produces about 500 million tons of nitrogen fertilizer per year, mostly in the form of anhydrous ammonia, ammonium

    nitrate, and urea, consumes about 1% of the world's annual energy supplyand sustains 40% of the world’s population.

    The Haber-Bosch process has been called “the most important invention of the 20th century”.

    It “detonated the population explosion”, driving the world's population from 1.6 billion in

    1900 to 6 billion in 2000.

    Smil (1999) Nature 400, 415; Fryzuk (2004) Nature 427, 498

  • The Green Revolution Norman Borlaug “the man who defused the population bomb”

  • Breeding for Improved Varieties

    “Plant Breeding is responsible for about 50% of crop productivity increase over the last century, while the

    remainder of the yield increase comes from better crop management (e.g. fertilization, irrigation, weeding)”

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationshttp://km.fao.org/gipb/

  • Fertilisers and The Green Revolution

    Grain yields at Rothamsted Broadbalk Field (since 1843)

  • Grain yields at Rothamsted Broadbalk field

    0123456789

    10

    1850 1900 1950 2000

    Gra

    in (t

    / ha

    )

    PK + 144 kg N

    PK + 48 kg N

    Unmanured

    Flan

    ders

    Brim

    ston

    e

    fung

    icid

    es

    wee

    dkill

    ers

    Red

    Ros

    tock

    Red

    Clu

    bSq

    uare

    head

    M

    Squa

    rehe

    ad M

    Red

    Sta

    ndar

    d

    Cap

    elle

    Des

    prez

    Apol

    lo

    Fertilisers and The Green Revolution

  • Australian Wheat Yields

    Kirkegaard & Hunt (2010) J. Exp. Bot. 61, 4129-4143

  • Production of Commodity Crops (1965-2008)

    The use of fertilizers accounts for approximately 50% of the yield increase, and greater irrigation for another substantial part.

    Nellemann, et al. (2009) The Environmental Food Crisis, UNEP

  • Crop Production and Resource Consumption

    Nellemann, et al. (2009)The Environmental Food Crisis,

    UNEP

    Increased crop yields are paralleled by increases in:the consumption of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers

    the amount of irrigated landthe use of pesticides

  • Global Increase in Crop Yield

    Breeding of improved varieties (especially shorter cereals and disease resistance)

    Improved weed control

    Improved pest and disease control

    Application of fertilisers

    Irrigation (especially S and SE Asia)

    Evans (1993) Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield.Cambridge University Press.

  • Potential Losses to Pests and Diseases(Expressed as % Yield)

    Oerke (2006) Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 144, 31-43

    Crop Weeds Animals Pathogens Viruses TotalWheat 23 9 16 3 50Rice 37 25 14 2 77

    Maize 40 16 9 3 69Potato 30 15 21 8 75

    Soybean 37 11 11 1 60Cotton 36 37 9 1 82

  • Losses to Pests and Diseases(Expressed as % Yield)

    Crop Without Pest Control Using mechanical, biological & chemical control measures

    Wheat 50 28Rice 77 37

    Maize 69 31Potato 75 40

    Soybean 60 26Cotton 82 29

    Oerke (2006) Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 144, 31-43

  • Postharvest Losses are Significant

    Nellemann, et al. (2009) The Environmental Food Crisis, UNEP

    There are significant postharvest losses in:Fresh fruits and vegetables

    Fluid milkProcessed foods and vegetables

    Meat, poultry and fishGrain products

    Caloric sweetenersFats and oils

    Other foods (including eggs and other dairy products)

  • Food Security - Definition

    “Food Security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and

    economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an

    active and healthy life”

    FAO World Food Summit (1996)

  • Challenge 1 – Sufficient Food for Nine Billion

    global population is projected to increase from 6.8 billion in 2009to over 9 billion in 2050

    Source: UN Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision, medium variant (2009)

  • Feeding The Nine Billion

    Source: FAO, USDA, Goldman Sachs Commodity Research

    “strong demand will require a substantial increasein acreage, which has been virtually unchanged

    for decades”

    “in the past demand growth has been met throughyield growth, however the strong demand growth

    ahead will create a need for substantialacreage expansion”

  • Feeding The Meat Eaters

    Source: FAO, USDA, Goldman Sachs Commodity Research

    “food demand is stable, feed demand is rising,and fuel demand is exploding”

  • Projected Contributions (%) to Increased Crop Production between 1997/99 and 2030

    Land area expansion

    Increase in cropping intensity

    Yield increase

    All developing countries

    21 12 67

    Sub-Saharan Africa

    27 12 61

    Near East/North Africa

    13 19 68

    Latin America and Caribbean

    33 21 46

    South Asia 6 13 81East Asia 5 14 81

    J Bruinsma (2003) World Agriculture: towards 2015/2030: an FAO perspective. Earthscan Publications Ltd.

  • Land Suitable for Rainfed Crops

    Nellemann, et al. (2009) The Environmental Food Crisis, UNEP

  • Yield Gaps

    The difference between actual and potential crop production.

    “By definition, yield potential

    is an idealized state in which a crop grows

    without any biophysical limitations other than

    uncontrollable factors, such as solar radiation,

    air temperature, and rainfall in rainfed systems”

    Lobell et al. (2009) Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 179-204

  • Global Yield Gap for Wheat

    Global aggregated yield gap = 43%(cf. 60% for maize and 47% for rice)

    Neumann et al. (2010) Agricultural Systems 103, 316-326

  • Major Contributors to Yield Gaps

    Lobell et al. (2009) Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 179-204

    Biophysical factors Socioeconomic factorsNutrient deficiencies & imbalances (N,P,K,Zn…) Profit maximization

    Water stress Risk aversion

    Flooding Inability to secure credit

    Soil problems (salinity, alkalinity, acidity, iron, aluminum, or boron toxicities, compaction…)

    Lack of knowledge on best practices

    Weed pressures Limited time devoted to activitiesInsect damage

    Diseases (head, stem, foliar, root)

    Suboptimal planting (timing or density)

    Lodging (from wind, rain, snow, or hail)

    Inferior seed quality

  • Analysis of Yield Gaps

    A wide range of yield gaps exists – 20 to 80% of yield potential

    Estimates most difficult in rainfed conditions

    Many irrigated cropping systems have yields at, or approaching 80% of potential – difficult to improve

    Closing yield gaps will depend on developing technologies that address husbandry, mineral nutrition, irrigation, soil conditions, crop protection

    Lobell et al. (2009) Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 179-204

  • Plant Mineral Nutrition and Crop YieldLiebig’s Law of The Minimum

    Crop yield is determined bythe limiting factor.

    Inputs that do not correctthe limiting factor aregenerally ineffective inincreasing yield.

  • Current Constraints to Crop ProductionWater

  • Current Constraints to Crop ProductionSoil

  • Phytoavailability of Mineral ElementsLimits Crop Production on Many Soils

    agricultural soils: acid (35-40%, red), alkaline (25-30%, blue), saline (5%)

    crop production is limited by soil pH

    wikipedia

  • Phytoavailability of Mineral Elements

    • Each element has an optimum pH for availability

    • Most elements available between pH 6 to 7

    • High pH limits the uptake of P, B, Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn

    • Plant roots can acidify the rhizosphere

    • Liming can be used to adjust pH if soil is acidic

  • Root Traits for Acid SoilsTarget the Limiting Factor – Aluminium Toxicity

    Al exclusion allows roots to grow

    Chelate Al in the rhizosphere by releasing organic acids or mucilage at root tip

    Raise rhizosphere pH

    Increase Al-binding to cell wall

    These also improve P acquisition

    Sequestering Al in root vacuoles

    Delhaize et al. (2007) FEBS Letters 581: 2255-2262

    Control

    TaALMT1

  • Management for Alkaline Soils

    Poor soil structure and a low infiltration capacityOften have hard calcareous layer at 0.5 - 1 m depth

    Soil alkalinity is associated with calcium carbonateOr, on alkaline sodic soils, sodium carbonate

    Low availability of P, N, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu and B

    Main constraint: lime-induced Fe and Zn deficiencies

    The pH of alkaline calcareous soils, where crop production is limited by high pH, Ca2+ and bicarbonate concentrations, can be lowered by the addition of S, Fe-sulphates or aluminium sulphate and fertilisers containing urea, ammonium or phosphate

  • Root Traits for Alkaline Soils Target the Limiting Factor – Iron and Zinc Deficiencies

    Rhizosphere acidification

    Efflux of organic acidsEfflux of phytosiderophoresEfflux of phenolics

    Mycorrhizal associationsBeneficial microbes

  • Management of Saline and Sodic Soils

    Toxicities:Na and Cl on saline soilsB and Na on sodic soils

    soluble salts accumulate with water flowsnear the surface of the soil

    or in subsoil moisture

    SSaline soils can be remediated by leaching soluble salts from the soil profile by flushing with fresh water

    Sodic soils can be remediated by applying Ca2+, often as gypsum, followed by flushing with fresh water

  • Root Traits for Saline or Sodic SoilsTarget the Limiting Factor – Sodium or Boron Toxicity

    Exploitation of “salt-free” zone

    Exclusion of Na, B or Cl• Increased expression of B efflux transporters (BOR genes) in roots• Na exclusion from leaves by retrieval from xylem sap (HKT genes)

    Prevent apoplastic bypasses

    Sequestration in non-vital compartments

    Munns & Tester (2008) ARPB 59: 651-681Reid (2010) Plant Science 178: 9-11

  • Efficiencies of Wheat Production(and the most limiting factors in different regions)

    Factors affecting yield gaps vary by region and are related to complex social, economic and political processes

    Neumann et al. (2010) Agricultural Systems 103, 316-326

  • Can We Produce SufficientFood for Nine Billion?

    9.5 billion

    Increase Agricultural LandProvide Appropriate InputsPrevent Preharvest LossesPrevent Postharvest Losses

  • Koning & van Ittersum (2009) Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 1, 77-82

    Can We Produce SufficientFood for Nine Billion?

    we are approaching the necessity of increased yields

    by increasing the level of complexityof agricultural systems

    and increasing energy inputs

  • research priorities “for advancing global welfare” as ranked by eight of the World’s top economists

    SOLUTION CHALLENGE1 Micronutrient supplements for children (vitamin A and zinc) Malnutrition2 The Doha development agenda Trade3 Micronutrient fortification (iron and salt iodization) Malnutrition4 Expanded immunization coverage for children Diseases5 Biofortification Malnutrition6 Deworming and other nutrition programs at school Malnutrition & Education7 Lowering the price of schooling Education8 Increase and improve girls’ schooling Women9 Community-based nutrition promotion Malnutrition

    10 Provide support for women’s reproductive role Women

    http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/About%20CC08/The%20Basic%20Idea.aspx

    Challenge 2 – Nutritious Food

  • Of the 6 billion people in the world,

    60-80% are Fe deficient, over 30% are Zn deficient, 30% are I deficient and about 15% are Se deficient

    Mineral Elements with Low Phytoavailability

    White & Broadley (2009) New Phytologist 182, 49-84

    Of the soils in the world,

    25-30% are alkaline with low Fe, Zn, Cu & Mn availability many lack sufficient I and Se for adequate animal nutrition

  • Through Agronomy

    the application ofmineral fertilisers

    Increasing Mineral Concentrations In Crops

    White & Broadley (2005) Trends in Plant Science 10, 586-593White & Broadley (2009) New Phytologist 182, 49-84

    Biofortification with selenium

    Screening potato genotypes

    Through Genetics

    select or breed varieties that accumulate minerals

  • Biofortification – Agronomic Strategies

    • If mineral elements are absent from the soil they must be applied to crops as soil or foliar fertilisers (plants cannot synthesise mineral elements)

    • If mineral elements are present in the soil, either agronomic or genetic strategies are developed to increase their phytoavailability, or mineral elementsmust be added as soil or foliar fertilisers

    White & Broadley (2009) New Phytologist 182, 49-84

  • Agronomic Biofortification with Zinc(Anatolia, Turkey)

    Cakmak (2004)Proceedings IFS 552

    http://www.harvestzinc.org/

  • Agronomic Biofortification with Zinc(Anatolia, Turkey)

    Project of 1 million USD

    Provided a Net Incomeof 100 million USD p.a.

    The International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA): The Anatolia initiative is oneof the world's first examples of using agricultural practices to address publichealth problems as well as improved crop production, and its successprovides a model for countless other nations. More soils throughout the world lackzinc than any other micronutrient. About 50 per cent of the world populationsuffers from iron and zinc deficiencies, which can be addressed throughthis cost-effective method. (http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/aw_ 2005.asp).

  • Agronomic Biofortification with Iodine(China)

    5% potassium iodate dripped into irrigation canalgiving 10-80 µg / L in water

    increased water soluble iodine in soil from 19 to 277 µg / Limproved human and animal iodine status and health

    Jiang et al. (1997) Arch. Environ. Health 52: 399-408

  • Mandatory Selenium Fertilisation(Finland)

    Enrichment of fertilisers with Se in FinlandIncreased grain Se concentrations

    and daily selenium intakesfrom below the RDI to the RDI

    Broadley et al. (2006) Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 65, 169-181.

  • Biofortification – Genetic Strategies

    • If mineral elements are absent from the soil they must be applied to crops as soil or foliar fertilisers

    • If mineral elements are present in the soil, crops can be developed that acquire mineral elements or distribute mineral elements to edible tissues more effectively

    • There are physiological constraints associated with the edible tissue consumed

    • There are phylogenetic constraints associated with evolutionary events impacting mineral composition

    White & Broadley (2009) New Phytologist 182, 49-84

  • Mineral Concentrations of Edible PortionsPhysiological & Phylogenetic Constraints

    Movement of mineral elements to edible tissues

    White & Broadley (2009) New Phytologist 182, 49-84

  • • Elements of dietary importance: zinc, iron, nitrogen

    location of mineral elements in wheat grain

    Cakmak et al. (2010) Cereal Chemistry 87, 10-20

    Mineral Concentrations of Edible PortionsPhysiological & Phylogenetic Constraints

  • White & Broadley (2005) Trends in Plant Science 10: 586-593

    Zn (mg kg-1DM) Ca (mg kg-1DM)Fe (mg kg-1DM)0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 0 1 2 3 4 0

    Brassicaoleracea

    (leaves)

    Phaseolusvulgaris

    (seed)

    Triticumaestivum

    (seed)

    Possible Ca-deficiencyupon transfer from bean-rich to cereal-rich diet

    Mineral Concentrations of Edible PortionsPhysiological & Phylogenetic Constraints

  • Pfeiffer & McClafferty (2007) Crop Science 47, S88-S105

    Within-Species Variation inConcentrations of Mineral Elements

    There is considerable genetic variationin mineral concentrations in edible portions of:

    maize, wheat, polished rice, barley, pearl millet, sorghum,beans, cowpea, lentil,

    cassava, potato, sweet potato and yams

  • QTL Impacting Mineral Concentrations inEdible Portions of Diverse Crop Species

    Few genes underlying QTL for mineral concentrations have been identified

    Crop Species Elements QTL Tissue ReferencesRice (Oryza sativa)

    FeFe, ZnPhytate

    33, 22

    graingraingrain

    Gregorio et al. (2000)Stangoulis et al. (2007)Stangoulis et al. (2007)

    Bean(Phaseolus vulgaris)

    Fe, ZnFe, Zn, CaZnFe, Zn, CaFe, ZnPhytateTannin

    7, 112, 1, 21013,134

    seedseedseedseedseedseedseed

    Beebe et al. (2000)Guzmán-Maldonado et al. (2003)Cichy et al. (2005)Gelin et al. (2007)Blair et al. (2009)Cichy et al. (2005)Guzmán-Maldonado et al. (2003)

    Brassica oleracea Ca, MgFe, Zn

    7, 4 leafleaf

    Broadley et al. (2008)Broadley et al. (2010)

    Brassica rapa Ca, Mg, CuFe, ZnPhytatePhytate

    0, 1, 01, 252

    leafleafleafseed

    Wu et al. (2008)Wu et al. (2008)Zhao et al. (2007)Zhao et al. (2007)

    Potato(Solanum tuberosum)

    Fe, ZnCa, Mg, Cu

    tubertuber

    White et al., unpublishedWhite et al., unpublished

  • Summary – Sufficient Food – Increasing Yields

    plants require at least 14 mineral nutrientssupplying these in fertilisers has increased crop yields

    yields still limited by phytoavailability of mineral nutrients

    in the immediate future need to address “yield gaps”yield gaps can be addressed through agronomy

    and/or germplasm can be developed for hostile soils

    reduce losses to pests and diseasesreduce postharvest wastage

    need to produce more with less resource

    roots of the second green revolution…

  • Summary – Nutritious Food – Biofortification

    many people are at risk of mineral deficienciesagronomic biofortification of crops can be successful

    if minerals are present in the soilcrops can be developed to accumulate them

    there are physiological and phylogenetic constraintsto the accumulation of minerals

    there is significant variation between genotypesin mineral acquisition and accumulation in edible tissues

    roots of the second green revolution…

  • Plant Roots Acquire Mineral Elements(provided they are available in the soil solution)

    Lynch JP (2007) Roots of the Second Green Revolution. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 493-512.

  • Contribution of Plant Mineral Nutrition to Global Food Security

    Sufficient, Safe & Nutritious Food