Community Profile: Tulsa metropolitan statistical area

COMMUNITY PROFILE:

TULSA METROPOLITAN

STATISTICAL AREAFOCUS ON WOMEN,

CHILDREN AND FAMILIESPresented to Women Impacting Tulsa

October 17, 2013

Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services

Commission

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDSTotal populationSexAgeRace and Hispanic Origin

Click icon to add picture

3

Osage

Creek

Tulsa

RogersPawnee

Okmulgee

Wagoner

Counties in the Tulsa Metropolitan Statistical Area

4

TULSA COUNTY AND TULSA METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA (MSA): 2012 TO 2075 POPULATION FORECAST

1910 1950 2000 2050 20750

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

MSA

Source: Oklahoma Department of Commerce, “2012 Demographic State of the State Report: Oklahoma State and County Population Projections through 2075.”

County

5

DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION BY AGE BY SEX: TULSA MSA, 2012

Total Under 5 Under 18 65+ 85+0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

49.1% 50.9% 51.3% 43.6% 34.2%

50.9% 49.1% 48.7% 56.4% 65.8%

FemaleMale

Source: US Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates.

6

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN LIFE EXPECTANCY

Life expectancy for men and women in 1920 was 1 year difference

Life expectancy for men and women in 1990 was 7 years difference

Life expectancy for men and women in 2011 is 5 years difference

At birth, there are more males than females. By age 36, the trend turns to more females than males. At age 100, women outnumber men by 8 to 1

7

LIFE EXPECTANCY BY SEX: U.S., 1900 TO 2011, AND OKLAHOMA, 2011

1900 1920 1940 1960 1990 2013 Okla. 2011

-

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

48.354.6

65.273.1

78.8 81.2 78.2

46.353.6

60.866.6

71.876.2 73.0

Female Male

Source: USDHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 61, No. 3, Sept. 24, 2012; CIA, The World Factbook: Life Expectancy at Birth.

8

Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupOklahoma, 1970 - 2030

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2010 Censuses; Oklahoma Department of Commerce, 2012 Demographic State of the State Report: Oklahoma State and County Population Projections 2075.

6.4

6.6

7

6.8

7.2

7.7

7.7

16.8

17.2

17.7

19

19.4

20.5

25.1

9

9.3

10.2

10.3

10.2

13.3

11.6

49

50

51.5

50.6

49.7

46

43.8

16.3

14.9

11.9

11.6

12

11.3

10.8

2030

2020

2010

2000

1990

1980

1970

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of population0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+

1.7

1.7

1.5

1.1

.9

Pr o

ject

ion s

(20 1

2) 2.5

2.1

Total population 1970 =2,559,229Total projected population 2030 = 4,302,501

9

RACE COMPARISON FOR TOTAL POPULATION AND YOUNG CHILDREN, TULSA MSA, 2012 ESTIMATES

63985367.2%

785508.3%

760728.0%

184191.9%

556695.8%

833178.8%

White Black American Indian & Alaska Native Asian 2+ races Hispanic

3395351.6%

63049.6%

58909.0%

14642.2%

774111.8%

1043615.9%

Total population = 951,880 Under 5 population = 65,788

Source: Census Bureau, Population Division, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race and Hispanic Origin for Counties, April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012,” June 2013.

10

RACE COMPARISON FOR TOTAL POPULATION AND YOUNG CHILDREN, TULSA MSA, 2012 ESTIMATES

63985367.2%

785508.3%

760728.0%

184191.9%

556695.8%

833178.8%

White Black American Indian & Alaska Native Asian 2+ races Hispanic

3395351.6%

63049.6%

58909.0%

14642.2%

774111.8%

1043615.9%

Total population = 951,880 Under 5 population = 65,788

Source: Census Bureau, Population Division, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race and Hispanic Origin for Counties, April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012,” June 2013.

FAMILY DYNAMICSFamilyChildren and youth


FAMILY

13

MARITAL STATUS AMONG WOMEN AGE 15 AND OVER: TULSA MSA, 2011

23.8%

49.8%

2.0%9.5%

14.9%Never marriedMarriedSeparatedWidowedDivorced

Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.

14

MARITAL STATUS AMONG WOMEN AGE 20 AND OVER: TULSA COUNTY, 2011

20 & over 20-34 35-64 65+0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

20%

49%

10%3%

51%

40%

60%

42%

2% 3% 3% 1%

10%

1% 4%

39%

17%

7%

23%16%

Never married Now married Separated Widowed Divorced

Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.

15

LIVING ARRANGEMENTS OF RELATED CHILDREN: TULSA COUNTY, 1970-2010, TULSA MSA, 2010

1970 1980 1990 2000 20100%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

82%74% 71%

65% 61%

7% 7%11%

16% 18% 21% 23%

4%9%

Tulsa County

Married couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970 through 2010 Censuses.

62.1%7.3%

20.7%

10.0%

Tulsa MSA 2010

16

CHILDREN IN NON-TRADITIONAL SETTINGS, TULSA MSA, 2010

Living with grandparents

Living with other relatives

Non-relatives Institutionalized0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000 18,393

5,006 4,118

317 1.0%

7.7%

Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.

1.7%2.1%

17

FAMILY TYPE FOR CHILDREN UNDER AGE 6 BY RACE AND ETHNICITY, TULSA MSA 2010

Total NH White

Black Am. Ind. Asian Other 2+ races

Hispanic0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

68.3%74.2%

31.5%

63.1%

89.3%73.6%

59.6%71.7%

8.9%8.1%

10.5%

10.4%

4.2%

10.3%

11.1%

10.1%

22.8% 17.7%

58.0%

26.6%6.5%

16.1%29.3%

18.2%

Married couple Male-headed Female-headed

Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.

18

Oklahoma’s Prison PopulationFiscal Years 1950 - 2008

Source: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2008

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000Prison population

19

INCARCERATION OF WOMEN

Oklahoma has the highest female incarceration rate among states at 132/100,000 – almost double national average (68)

2,700 Oklahoma women were incarcerated in 2011 67% for non-violent offenses

3% of Oklahoma children have at least one parent in prison Children with an incarcerated parent are five times more likely to

spend time in prison themselves Average length of stay is 1.9 years 3 year recidivism rate is 14.4% Offense categories (fy2010 receptions)

Possession/obtaining CDS: 23.8% Distribution CDS: 19.1% Forgery: 8.5% Larceny: 7.1% Assault: 7.0%

20

PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED MOTHERS IN OKLAHOMA

Paternal relatives

Foster care or state agency

Other maternal relatives

Father

Maternal grandparent(s)

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

7.2%

15.9%

22.5%

28.3%

29.0%

Source: Oklahoma Commission on Children and Youth, “Study of Incarcerated Women and Their Children,” Nov. 21, 2008.

21

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS FOR INFANTS, TULSA MSA, 2012

Premature (<37 weeks gest.)

Very short birth spacing (<18 mos. apart)

Short birth spacing (<24 mos. apart)

Very low birthweight (<1500 grams)

Low birthweight (1500-2499 grams)

Mother w/ <12th grade education

Poor prenatal care (3rd tri. or no care)

Unmarried

Teen mother (15-19)

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%

12.4%

16.6%

31.1%

1.6%

7.4%

21.4%

10.0%

42.2%

10.1%

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics 2012, OK2SHARE, accessed on 10/11/13.

Total births = 13,133

Note: Lighter colored bars indicate 2009 data.

CHILDREN AND YOUTH

23

OKLAHOMA RANKINGS ON INDICATORS OF CHILD WELL-BEING

Indicator Oklahoma rank

Best State (#1)

Worst State (#50)

Overall child well-being

36 New Hampshire

New Mexico

Economic well-being 25 North Dakota MississippiEducation 40 Massachusett

sNevada

Health 43 Maine MontanaFamily and Community

39 New Hampshire

Mississippi

Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

24

OKLAHOMA RANKINGS ON SPECIFIC CHILD INDICATORS

Indicator U.S. rate

Tulsa County

rateOklahoma

rateOklahom

a rankBest rank

Median family income $58,000 $54,442 $49,400 7 50Children in poverty 23% 23% 23% 30 1Children below 200% poverty 45% 47% 49% 35 1Population in poverty 16% 15% 17% 33 1Children 3 & 4 not enrolled in preschool 54% 50% 59% 34 1Population 25-34 not high school graduate

12% 15% 13% 36 1

Children living in concentrated poverty 12% 16% 12% 34 1Children in single parent families 35% 30% 36% 30 1Children living with neither parent 5% 10% 6% 41 1Low birth weight babies 8.1% 8.8% 8.4% 30 1Children confirmed victims of maltreatment

9/1,000 9/1,000 8/1,000 19 1


25

THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY PYRAMID

Early DeathDisease,

Disability and Social Problems

Adoption of Health-risk Behaviors

Social, Emotional and Cognitive Impairment

Disrupted Neurodevelopment

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesConception

Death

Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being

throughout the LifespanSource: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

26

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES…

Recurrent physical abuse Recurrent emotional abuse Sexual abuse An alcohol or drug abuser An incarcerated household member Someone who is chronically depressed,

suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill Mother being treated violently Living with one or neither parent Emotional or physical neglect

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”

…GROWING UP IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES:

Smoking Overeating Physical inactivity Heavy alcohol

use Drug use Promiscuity

…ADOPTION OF HEALTH RISK BEHAVIORS…

Nicotine addiction Alcoholism Drug addiction Obesity Depression Suicide Injuries Unintentional pregnancy Adolescent pregnancy Heart disease Cancer Chronic lung and liver

disease Stroke Diabetes Fetal death Sexually transmitted diseases

…DISEASE, DISABILITY AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS

IN ADULTHOOD

28

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCESCOUNTY RANKINGS

Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst*Indicates a tie with at least one other county

Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007, Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy

Tulsa Creek Wagoner

Rogers

Osage

Okmulgee

Pawnee

Parental separation or divorce

49 33 46 55 9 50 59

Incarcerated household member

76 50 23 18 21 53 41

Mentally ill household member

77 67* 67* 30* 30* 67* 30*

Substance abusing household member

76* 1* 1* 31* 31* 1* 31*

Violence against mother

57 36 55 60 49 54 34

Psychological, physical & sexual abuse

12 7 8 26 20 19 13

Emotional & physical neglect

4 16 19 22 15 11 3

Overall ranking 31 15 19 25 10 29 11

29

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE A woman is assaulted or beaten every 9

seconds in the US Nationally, 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men

have experienced severe physical violence by an intimate partner

876 homicides due to domestic violence identified from 1998 to 2008 in Oklahoma

Men who as children witnessed their parents’ domestic violence were twice as likely to abuse their own wives than sons of nonviolent parents

30

Child Abuse and Neglect Reports Received and Accepted for Investigation or Assessment

Oklahoma, Fiscal Year 2000 - 2012

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000Number of reports received and accepted

Reports received 53,548 53,460 53,562 57,383 59,329 61,613 63,128 63,931 65,493 64,293 64,710 66,541 68,111Reports accepted 35,477 35,360 38,077 36,967 36,232 36,605 36,445 36,034 35,080 30,625 28,638 29,468 32,421

Notes: Each “report” of child abuse and/or neglect “received” and “accepted” may involve multiple children.

31

Number of Children Assessed or Investigated and Confirmed as Victims of Child Abuse and Neglect

Oklahoma, Fiscal Year 2000- 2012

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000Number of children

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%Confirmation rate

Assessed or Investigated 62,023 56,251 62,795 62,626 60,770 61,926 63,116 62,559 61,327 53,394 45,811 48,393 44,232Confirmed 14,273 13,394 13,903 12,971 12,347 13,328 13,827 13,191 11,714 8,605 7,248 8,110 9,842

Confirmation rate 23% 24% 22% 21% 20% 22% 22% 21% 19% 16% 16% 17% 22%

Notes: Each child assessed, investigated or confirmed for child abuse and/or neglect indicates one child. Since a child may be assessed, investigated or confirmed multiple times in a year, these values are not necessarily unduplicated counts of children. “Confirmation rate” is the number of children confirmed abused and/or neglected per 100 children investigated or assessed.

32

Child Deaths Due to AbuseOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2010

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

75

12 13

1821

16 16

24

31

2325

18

38

2023

3134

29

4245

47 48

3835

27

51

40

32

3941

52

38

1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 20100

10

20

30

40

50

60

33

PERCENTAGE OF 4TH GRADERS NOT PROFICIENT IN READING BY RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN: UNITED STATES: 2011


34

REPORTED GRADUATION RATES: OKLAHOMA

19971998 19992000 2001 2002 20032004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201120120.0%

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%

100.0%

72.9% 73.4%74.4%74.3% 75.2% 74.3% 74.5% 75.4%

0.9730000000000010.9720000000000010.9700000000000010.9730000000000010.9780000000000010.9790000000000010.9790000000000010.977000000000001

0.7960.7720000000000010.784 0.798 0.79

Graduation Rate Senior Graduation RateAveraged Freshman Graduation Rate

Graduation rate is calculated by comparing the current number of graduates to the 9th grade student enrollment four years earlier. Beginning 2005 a Senior graduation rate was used, which divides current year graduates by graduates plus dropouts (under age 19) for the 12th grade that same year. SYE 2008 Average freshman graduation rate was added for state and county district totals, calculated as current graduates divided by the cohort of the average number of students in 8th, 9th, and 10th grades.

Source: Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability.

35

REPORTED DROPOUT RATES: TULSA COUNTY

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%

10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%

6.4% 6.4% 6.1% 5.5% 5.2%4.0%

4.7% 4.2%

16.8% 17.3%18.2%

17.5%16.5%

13.9%13.0% 12.6%

Dropout rate (ADM) Dropout rate (fall enroll.) 4-year dropout rate

SYE 1995 to SYE 2000: Dropout rate- The number of 9th through 12th grade dropouts is divided by 9th through 12th grade average daily membership. SYE 2001 to SYE 2004: the number of 9th through 12th grade dropouts is divided by 9th through 12th grade fall enrollment. Beginning with school year ending, 2005 the Office of Accountability added a four-year high school dropout rate. The total number of dropouts for a graduating class was calculated by adding the dropout counts under age 19 for the 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade over the previous four-year period, respectively. Then dividing by the sum of their graduates plus the legal dropouts.


36

CSC CALCULATED ATTRITION RATES: TULSA COUNTY

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-30.0%

-25.0%

-20.0%

-15.0%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

-24.5% -24.9% -24.5%-26.0%

-27.2%

-24.6%-25.9% -26.7% -26.8% -27.6%

na na

Based on data reported by the Oklahoma Office of Accountability, attrition rate is calculated by dividing number of 9th graders minus the number of 12th graders of same cohort by the number of 9th graders (same cohort).


37

Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

38.3%

19.1%

4.2%

17.2%

22.7%

7.2%

19.7%

38.7%

23.1%

3.8%

25.6%

18.1%

8.2%

24.1%

Alcohol

Marijuana

Methamphetamine

Offered/sold/givenillegal drugs at school

Smoked cigarettesduring past month

Drove after/while drinkingalcohol in past month

Rode with drinkingdriver in past month

0% 20%40%60%80%100%

2003 Oklahoma2005 Oklahoma2007 Oklahoma2009 Oklahoma2011 Oklahoma2011 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S., 2011

Used once or more during past 30 days...

Ever used...

38

Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

50.5%

5%

57.1%

20.5%

6.3%

33%

50.8%

47.4%

6.2%

60.2%

18%

7.8%

28.2%

49.5%

Ever hadsexual intercourse

Had sex before age 13

Used condom last time

Used birth controlpills last time

Attempted suicidein past year

Overweight or obese(according to BMI)

Physical activity for60 min/day 5 of past 7 days

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2003 Oklahoma2005 Oklahoma2007 Oklahoma2009 Oklahoma2011 Oklahoma2011 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S., 2011

na

ECONOMIC CONDITIONSLabor force participationLiving wage and povertyRole of educationIncome inequalityProgram participation


LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION

41

UNEMPLOYMENT RATES: TULSA MSA, 1990-2013

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 June 20130.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

4.8

2.9

7.7

5.6

5.9

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics.

42

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES FOR PERSONS 16 & OLDER BY SEX

1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

MenWomenBoth sexes

Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012.

57.1%

68.2%62.5%

Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

43

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES AMONG PERSONS 16 & OVER BY AGE

1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

26.5%

65.9%

81.3%

31.0%

10.0%

16-1920-2425-5465-7475+


44

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES FOR PERSONS 16 & OLDER BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND BY SEX

1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

Hispanic menAsian menNH White menOther race menBlack menOther race womenBlack womenNH White womenAsian womenHispanic women


71.0%

63.4%

67.2%

75.9%

56.1%56.1%

63.1%59.5%57.9%57.2%

LIVING WAGE AND POVERTY

46

COMPARISON OF SELF-SUFFICIENCY WAGE TO POVERTY GUIDELINES, BY SIZE OF FAMILYTULSA COUNTY, 2013

Family Size

Self-Sufficiency

Wage (annual)

Poverty Guidelines (annual)

Dollar Difference

Self-Sufficiency Percent of Poverty

One person $21,227

($10.05/hour)$11,490

($5.44/hour) $9,737 185%

Two persons

$38,033($18.01/hour)

$15,510($7.34/hour) $22,523 245%

Three persons

$43,526($20.61/hour)

$19,530($9.25/hour) $23,996 223%

Four persons

$51,027($12.08/hour/

adult)

$23,550($5.58/hour/

adult)$27,477 217%

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment.

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/24/2013, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2013.

47

Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2013

$75,160

$54,442

$39,730

$10,800$15,312

$19,530

$36,131

$21,502

WelfareWage

MinimumWage

PovertyWage

185% PovertyWage

EstimatedMedian Family

Income*(2007-11 ACS)

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000Annual Wage

Self-Sufficiency Wage = $43,526($20.61/hr)

Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income

($5.12/hr) ($7.25/hr) ($9.25/hr) ($17.11/hr)

Married-couple families w/ children <18

($26/hr)

All families w/ children <18

Male-headed families w/ children <18

Female-headed families w/ children <18

($36/hr)

($10/hr)

($19/hr)

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/24/2013, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Values shown for median family income are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

48

POVERTY RATES BY SEX AND AGE: TULSA MSA, 2007-11

Total pop

Under 6

6-17 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75 & older

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

15.8%

26.7%

19.1%

24.9%

19.9%

13.7%

10.4%9.2% 8.2%

11.5%13.0%

24.6%

19.5%

16.9%

11.7%9.8%

8.4% 8.2%6.0%

7.3%

FemaleMale

Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.

49Total pop Under 18 Under 6 65+0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

14.4%

21.4%25.6%

8.3%

34.7%

45.8%

52.0%

31.9%

100% 200%

RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY BY AGE: TULSA MSA, 2007-11


50

POVERTY RATES BY FAMILY TYPE: TULSA MSA, 2007-11

no related children5-7 only

<5 and 5-17<5 only

with related children <18Female-headed family

no related children5-7 only

<5 and 5-17<5 only

with related children <18Male-headed familyno related children

5-7 only<5 and 5-17

<5 onlywith related children <18

Married-couple familyAll families

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%10.6%

32.5%60.2%

47.9%41.1%

32.4%11.0%

16.3%32.2%

14.8%18.6%

15.7%2.5%

5.3%15.9%

7.7%8.0%

5.0%10.6%


ROLE OF EDUCATION

52

Doctorate degree

Professional school degree

Master's degree

Bachelor's degree

Associate degree

Some college

High school graduate

Less than high school

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%1.1%

2.3%

5.3%

17.8%

7.7%

23.0%

29.9%

12.9%

0.5%

1.0%

5.4%

17.3%

8.6%

25.1%

30.5%

11.5%

0.8%

1.7%

5.4%

17.6%

8.2%

24.1%

30.2%

12.2%

TotalFemaleMale

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR PERSONS AGE 25 & OVER BY SEX: TULSA MSA, 2007-11


53

REAL HOURLY WAGE BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENTUNITED STATES, 1973-2012

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45

Less than high school High school Some college College Advanced degree

2012 dol-lars

Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14.

$29.56

$24.46

$18.06$16.77

$14.63

$37.34

$28.28

$17.30

$15.78

$11.75

54

REAL HOURLY WAGE BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR WOMENUNITED STATES, 1973-2012

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45


2012 dol-lars


$25.30

$19.10

$13.79$12.76

$10.31

$31.55

$24.21

$15.53

$13.70

$10.06

55

REAL HOURLY WAGE BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR MENUNITED STATES, 1973-2012

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45


2012 dol-lars


$31.07

$27.97

$20.73$20.27

$17.10

$43.42

$32.54

$19.20

$17.41

$12.75

56

Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment, by SexUnited States, 2012

Less thanhigh school

High school College degree Advanced degree$0.00

$10.00

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00

$50.00Real hourly wage (2012 dollars)

Both sexes Women Men

Both sexes $11.75 $15.78 $28.28 $37.34Women $10.06 $13.70 $24.21 $31.55

Men $12.75 $17.41 $32.54 $43.42Women % of Men 78.9% 78.7% 74.4% 72.7%

Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th edition, table 4.14.

PROGRAM PARTICIPATION

58

Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating

During a Single Month, Tulsa County, 2012

116,415

76,569

3,829

9,063

3,667

89,325

2,720

34,358

6,314

19.3%

47%

43.5%

20.2%

8.2%

14.8%

1.8%

55.1%

10.1%

Soonercare Total (185%/100%)

Soonercare <19 (185%)

WIC Infants (185%)

WIC age 1-5 (185%)

Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)

SNAP Total (130%)

TANF <18 (50%)

Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)

Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)

050,000100,000150,000

Number of Participants

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Percent of Population

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, Jan.2012.

INCOME GUIDELINES FOR FREE AND REDUCED PRICE MEALS FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2012-13

Source: Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 57, March 23, 2012

Household Size

Federal Poverty

Guidelines

Reduced Price Meals: 185%

of poverty

Free Meals: 130% of poverty

1 $11,170 $20,665 $14,5212 $15,130 $27,991 $19,6693 $19,090 $35,317 $24,8174 $23,050 $42,643 $29,9655 $27,010 $49,969 $35,1136 $30,970 $57,295 $40,2617 $34,930 $64,621 $45,4098 $38,890 $71,947 $50,557

For each add’l member, add

$3,960 $7,326 $5,148

60

Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program

By School District, Tulsa County, 2011-12 School Year

Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-2012.

55.5%80.8%

58.4%62.6%

54.2%55.8%58.4%

45.6%42.6%

34.3%33.6%

30.5%29.4%28.3%

18.7%

9.5%9.5%

16.3%9.8%

14%11.1%7.3%

9.5%2.4%

10%10.6%

9.6%7.5%

7.8%4.2%

Tulsa County TotalTulsa

KeystoneSperry

Sand SpringsUnion

Liberty SkiatookGlenpool

CollinsvilleBroken Arrow

BerryhillJenks

OwassoBixby

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Students Eligible

Free Reduced

Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $25,389 for a family of three.

Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $36,131 for a family of three.

By School District, Tulsa County, 2012-13 School Year

Source: Oklahoma State Dept of Education, Low Income Report for 2012-13.

61

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE AND REDUCED LUNCH PROGRAM: TULSA MSA BY COUNTY, 2012-13 SCHOOL YEAR

Rogers

Tulsa

Wagoner

Creek

Osage

Okmulgee

Pawnee

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

11.6%

9.5%

9.9%

12.4%

13.6%

12.1%

12.5%

45.7%

55.5%

56.0%

57.9%

59.3%

62.0%

64.3%

ReducedFree

Source: Oklahoma State Dept of Education, Low Income Report for 2012-13.

COMMUNITY PROFILE:

TULSA METROPOLITAN

STATISTICAL AREAFOCUS ON WOMEN,

CHILDREN AND FAMILIESPrepared by the Community Service Council, with

support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission

…is available on our website: www.csctulsa.org

Documents

Community Profile: Tulsa metropolitan statistical area