42
Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science John Cook Climate Literacy and Environmental Awareness Network Date: 17 May 2012

Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

  • Upload
    najila

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science. John Cook. Climate Literacy and Environmental Awareness Network Date: 17 May 2012. One Model of the Human Brain. A More Accurate Model of the Human Brain. Familiarity Backfire Effect. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Communication & Debunking withSticky ScienceJohn Cook

Climate Literacy and Environmental Awareness Network

Date: 17 May 2012

Page 2: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science
Page 3: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

One Model of the Human Brain

Page 4: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

A More Accurate Model of the Human Brain

Page 5: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Familiarity Backfire Effect

Debunking a myth can reinforce the myth in people’s minds(Schwarz et al 2007)

Page 6: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Familiarity Backfire Effect

Page 7: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Familiarity Backfire Effect

Page 8: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Danger, Will Robinson!Approaching

myth!

Page 9: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

The Overkill Backfire Effect

A simple myth is more cognitively attractive than an over-complicated correction (Schwarz et al 2007)

Page 10: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

The Overkill Backfire Effect

A simple myth is more cognitively attractive than an over-complicated correction (Schwarz et al 2007)

Page 11: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

“I didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one

instead.”MARK TWAIN

Page 12: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

“If you can’t explain your physics to a

barmaid, it is probably not very

good physics.”ERNST

RUTHERFORD

Page 13: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Another psychological pitfall

Page 14: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Create a Gap

Page 15: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Fill the Gap

Page 16: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Anatomy of an Effective Debunking

Page 17: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Anatomy of an Effective Debunking97 out of 100 climate experts agree humans are causing global warming

Several independent surveys find 97% of climate scientists who are actively publishing peer-reviewed

climate research agree that humans are causing global warming.

Core fact

Page 18: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Anatomy of an Effective Debunking97 out of 100 climate experts agree humans are causing global warming

Several independent surveys find 97% of climate scientists who are actively publishing peer-reviewed

climate research agree that humans are causing global warming.

However, movements that deny a scientific consensus have always sought to cast doubt on the fact that a

consensus exists. One technique is the use of fake experts, citing scientists who have little to no expertise

in the particular field of science.

Core fact

Warning

Page 19: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Anatomy of an Effective Debunking97 out of 100 climate experts agree humans are causing global warming

Several independent surveys find 97% of climate scientists who are actively publishing peer-reviewed

climate research agree that humans are causing global warming.

However, movements that deny a scientific consensus have always sought to cast doubt on the fact that a

consensus exists. One technique is the use of fake experts, citing scientists who have little to no expertise

in the particular field of science.

Core fact

Warning

MythFor example, the OISM Petition Project claims 31,000 scientists disagree with the scientific consensus on

global warming.

Page 20: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Anatomy of an Effective Debunking97 out of 100 climate experts agree humans are causing global warming

Several independent surveys find 97% of climate scientists who are actively publishing peer-reviewed

climate research agree that humans are causing global warming.

However, movements that deny a scientific consensus have always sought to cast doubt on the fact that a

consensus exists. One technique is the use of fake experts, citing scientists who have little to no expertise

in the particular field of science.

Core fact

Warning

Myth

AlternativeExplanation

For example, the OISM Petition Project claims 31,000 scientists disagree with the scientific consensus on

global warming.

However, around 99.9% of the scientists listed in the Petition Project are not climate scientists. The

petition is open to anyone with a Bachelor of Science or higher and includes medical doctors, mechanical

engineers and computer scientists.

Page 21: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science
Page 22: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

“Fight sticky ideas with stickier ideas.”

Page 23: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

What makes an idea sticky?

SUCCES

Page 24: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

What makes an idea sticky?

SUCCES

• Simple

Page 25: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

What makes an idea sticky?

SUCCES

• Simple• Unexpected

Page 26: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

What makes an idea sticky?

SUCCES

• Simple• Unexpected• Concrete

Page 27: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

What makes an idea sticky?

SUCCES

• Simple• Unexpected• Concrete

• Credible

Page 28: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

What makes an idea sticky?

SUCCES

• Simple• Unexpected• Concrete

• Credible

• Emotional

Page 29: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

What makes an idea sticky?

SUCCES

• Simple• Unexpected• Concrete

• Credible

• Emotional

• Stories

Page 30: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

The Curiosity Gap

Page 31: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Generate curiosity by opening gaps in their knowledge then filling those gaps

The Curiosity Gap

Page 32: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Debunking Method

Create a gap with the facts

Fill the gap with an alternative explanation

Page 33: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

Debunking Method

Create a gap to generate

curiosity

Fill the gap with answers to questions

Generating Curiosity

Create a gap with the facts

Fill the gap with an alternative explanation

Page 34: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

“…the earth quit warming and now we may be in a cooling

cycle.”DANA

ROHRABACHER

Example of a Debunking

Page 35: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science
Page 36: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science
Page 37: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

• Simple

Page 38: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

• Unexpected

• Simple

Page 39: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

• Unexpected

• Simple

• Concrete

Page 40: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

• Unexpected

• Simple

• Concrete

• Story

Page 41: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

http://sks.to/debunk http://sks.to/guide

Page 42: Communication & Debunking with Sticky Science

John CookGlobal Change Institute, University of Queensland

Web: http://www.skepticalscience.com