23
College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston & Associates

College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

College of the Mainland

Redistricting Hearings

April 30 and May 15, 2012

Gene Locke, AttorneyAndrews Kurth LLP

Leslie Johnston, DemographerJohnston & Associates

Page 2: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

April 30, 2012 Andrews Kurth2

LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR REDISTRICTING

Population Equality: “One Person — One Vote”

Baker v. Carr

Reynolds v. Sims

Protections Against Discrimination of Racial, Ethnic, and Language Minorities

Voting Rights Act

Equal Protection/14th Amendment: Redistricting Based on Race

Shaw v. Reno

Bush v. Vera

Texas Constitution: Equal Protection Clause and Equal Rights Amendment

Page 3: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

April 30, 2012 Andrews Kurth3

Local governments are required to draw districts that are “substantially equal in population”

Ten Percent Standard: Maximum deviation in population between the largest and the smallest districts

Courts will look at any significant deviation on a case-by-case basis, evaluating all factors used by the governmental body to draw districts

Courts recognize the importance of making districts compact, respecting traditional boundaries, maintaining communities of interest, preserving the core of prior districts, and avoiding contests between incumbents

POPULATION EQUALITY: “ONE PERSON — ONE VOTE”

Page 4: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

April 30, 2012 Andrews Kurth4

VOTING RIGHTS ACT: PROTECTION AGAINST RACIAL,ETHNIC AND LANGUAGE MINORITY DISCRIMINATION

Voting Rights Act was enacted to provide minority voters an opportunity to participate in the electoral process and to elect candidates of their choice.

Enacted in 1965 to prohibit a government from imposing a “voting qualification or prerequisite to voting or standard, practice or procedure . . . in a manner which results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.”

Voting Rights Act was amended in 1975 to include protections for members of language minority groups.

Page 5: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

April 30, 2012 Andrews Kurth5

PRIORITIES AND PRINCIPLES FOR REDISTRICTING

(1) The five COM Single Member Trustee Districts will be of substantially equal population and, in no event, exceed a ten percent top to bottom deviation.

(2) The new COM Single Member Trustee Districts should be contiguous and reasonably compact.

(3) The new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will be based, to the extent possible, on the existing trustee district composition.

(4) Where possible, COM will use easily identifiable geographic boundaries as district boundaries.

(5) Where possible, the COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will seek to maintain communities of interest in a single district and avoid splitting neighborhoods when drawing district lines.

Page 6: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

April 30, 2012 Andrews Kurth6

PRIORITIES AND PRINCIPLES FOR REDISTRICTING (continued)

(6) The COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will use whole county voting precincts, whenever possible, to draw trustee districts.

(7) The new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will adhere to the Voting Rights Act and avoid retrogression in the position of racial, ethnic and language minorities with respect to the effective exercise of their right to vote.

(8) The new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will adhere to the Equal Protection Clause and will not use race as the predominate factor in developing the plan.

(9) Recognizing the value of incumbent-constituency relations, the new COM Single Member Redistricting Plan will seek to keep existing trustees in their existing districts.

Page 7: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

7April 30, 2012

Page 8: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

8April 30, 2012

Page 9: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

9April 30, 2012

Page 10: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

10April 30, 2012

Page 11: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

11April 30, 2012

Page 12: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

12April 30, 2012

Page 13: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

13April 30, 2012

Page 14: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

14April 30, 2012

Page 15: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

15April 30, 2012

Page 16: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

16April 30, 2012

Page 17: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

17April 30, 2012

Page 18: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

18April 30, 2012

Page 19: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

19April 30, 2012

Page 20: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

20April 30, 2012

Page 21: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

21April 30, 2012

Page 22: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

22April 30, 2012

Page 23: College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &

April 30, 2012 Andrews Kurth23

Questions

Gene LockeAndrews Kurth LLP

600 Travis Suite 4200

Houston, Texas(713) 220-3956

[email protected]

Leslie JohnstonJohnston & Associates

(325) [email protected]