Upload
abhishek-abhi
View
223
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation
Citation preview
The Precision Toothbrush
Prianka Jhingan
Monday November 3, 2014
1
The launch of Colgate’s Precision Toothbrush results in increased profitability and is a financially viable decision long-term.
Increased advertising expenditures will result in increased category visibility in the super premium segment
Positive NPV suggests that Colgate can expect a gain from launching the Precision toothbrush with a mainstream positioning strategy in comparison to its current market situation.
A strategic price will ensure that Colgate will remain competitive in the toothbrush market
Colgate can expect an increase in market share and can assume position of a market leader within the toothbrush
category after the launch.
With an increased market share and size, Colgate is able to expect a return on the investment costs
NPV Before Investment $55,007,345
Investment Costs $9,550,000
NPV $45,457,345
2
With a projected growing market size, Colgate’s super premium product offering can satisfy the increasing demand in the toothbrush category.
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Population 246,820,000 249,620,000 252,980,000 256,510,000 259,075,100 261,665,851
% of those using toothbrushes 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88%
Total Toothbrush Users
217,201,600
219,665,600 222,622,400 225,728,800 227,986,088 230,265,949
# of Toothbrushes/Person
/Year (how many they have) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.9 2
Total Toothbrushes
325,802,400
329,498,400 333,933,600 406,311,840 433,173,567 460,531,898
% of Toothbrushes Coming from Retail 75% 75% 75% 78% 75% 75%
Total Retail Toothbrushes
244,351,800
247,123,800 250,450,200 316,923,235 324,880,175 345,398,923
Calculated using historical retail units sold from Exhibit 13 (Shown in Appendix 1)
Increasing because of the number of promotions and free brushes, so although the number of people are not purchasing as many brushes, they are stocking. Trend is expected to continue due to new products in the market and increased consumer sampling.
On average, one in four toothbrushes come from the dentist. In 1992, 22% of all toothbrushes were expected to be distributed to consumers by dentists.
On average replace brushes every 7.5 months and 65% of people had more than one toothbrush
Estimated to grow at approximately 1%, keeping in line with historical increases
3
Without introducing a super premium product in this category, Colgate will lose 3% share in 1993 and 4.5% share in 1994 in the toothbrush market.
Current Colgate users, currently looking for a super premium offering will have to switch to
another brand, resulting in loss of market share and falling behind competition.
Base Case
% of Market Share Changes by Product/Company 1992-1993 1993-1994
Colgate Classic -2.5% -1.5%
Colgate Plus -0.5% -3%
Colgate Precision 0% 0%
Total Change for Colgate -3% -4.5%
Oral-B Indicator +2.5% +2.5%
Oral-B Regular -2% -1.5%
Total Change for Oral-B 0% +1%
J&J Reach -1.5% -1.5%
J&J Reach Advanced +2.5% +2.5%
Total Change for J&J +1% +1%
Crest +4% +3%
Total Change for P&G +4% +3%
Aquafresh Flex +3% +2.5%
Total Change for Aquafresh +3% +2.5%
Base Case
Total Market Share 1992 1993 1994
Colgate 22.2% 19.2% 14.7%
Oral-B 19.8% 20.3% 21.3%
J&J 19.4% 20.2% 21.2%
Crest 2% 6% 9%
Aquafresh Flex 4.6% 7.6% 10.1%
The increase in the premium segment is coming from the professional segment, as more consumers are concerned about oral health and are taking more interest in the category.
Super-premium brushes accounted for 35% of the unit volume and the professional segment
accounted for a corresponding 41% . Colgate would be excluding itself from a large portion of
the evolving market.
4
Colgate should establish Precision’s position as being a technological breakthrough in the oral health market.
Results of the consumer concept test revealed the following criteria as highest in consumer priority. Precision is an overall superior product on dimensions that matter to consumers.
How Precision Compares Evaluation: Is Precision
technologically superior?
Oral-B
Indicator
- Removes 35% more plaque than Oral-B
- Dental professional focus groups
conducted to verify the overall acceptance
of Precision
Reach
Advanced
Design
- Removes 35% more plaque than Reach
- Handle design offering maximum plaque
removal
Crest
Complete
- Triple action bristles – short (scrub plaque
off surface of teeth), long (remove plaque
between teeth), angled (sweep plaque
from gum lines)
Aquafresh
Flex
- Bristles allow freer movement
- Designed to help prevent gum disease
Summary of Concept Test Results
Probably Would Buy
Plaque Removal 69%
35% More Plaque Removal/ Prevention of Gum Disease 80%
Gum Disease Only 72%
- 67% of consumers are actively involved in their oral health, searching for better products - Able to differentiate among products and search out functionally effective products - Research indicates that consumers are becoming more concerned about the health of their gums - Consumers are willing to experiment with new toothbrushes - Crucial to communicate the importance of plaque removal to overall health
5
Mainstream Case
% of Market Share Changes by Product/Portfolio 1992-1993 1993-1994
Colgate Classic -3.5% -1%
Colgate Plus -2% -3%
Colgate Precision 6% 15%
Total Change for Colgate +0.5% +11%
Oral-B Indicator +1% 2%
Oral-B Regular -2% -5%
Total Change for Oral-B -1% -3%
J&J Reach -1.5% -3.5%
J&J Reach Advanced +1.5% +1%
Total Change for J&J 0% -2.5%
Crest +2.5% +2%
Total Change for P&G +2.5% +2%
Aquafresh Flex +2% +1.5%
Total Change for Aquafresh +2% +1.5%
Mainstream Case
Total Market Share 1992 1993 1994
Colgate 22.2% 22.7% 27.7%
Oral-B 19.8% 18.8% 15.3%
J&J 19.4% 19.2% 16.7%
Crest 2% 4.5% 6.5%
Aquafresh Flex 4.6% 6.5% 8.1%
With a mainstream launch, Colgate will be the market leader in
the toothbrush category, gaining 22.7% of the market share in
1993 and 27.7% in 1994.
The super premium products of competitors would have increased by significantly higher had it not been for the launch of the Precision toothbrush
Oral B and Johnson & Johnson, former market leaders in the super premium segment, do not experience a growth in their toothbrush category overall.
Colgate experienced the largest growth in 1994, substantially ahead of its competitors, with a growth of 11% overall.
6
Colgate Precision should expect 6% of the market share in the category in its first year and 15% in the next year.
Here’s What we Know: - Competitors have launched a super premium toothbrush
in the category and have been able to experience a growth - Past launches suggest that the professional product
offering is cannibalized by its super premium product - Precision is a product that offers consumers a benefit that
is valued and is not offered by any other product in the market
- Oral B and J&J super premium launches saw similar results but the category is further developed and consumers are demanding quality and are aware
- Steinberg’s estimate for the first year at 10% is too high based on past launches
1991 1992E BRAND Vol (%) Vol (%)
ORAL-B Oral-B Indicator 1.0 3.7
J & J
Reach Advanced Design 0.7 4.0 AQUA-FRESH 0.9 4.6
How Precision will be able to capture share:
First Year: Therapeutic brushers most commonly use Oral B Regular, J&J Reach and Colgate Plus - Colgate Precision would be able to capture share from the products on the basis of switching from professional to the super premium segment
Second year: Colgate Precision would be able to take share from Oral-B Indicator and J&J Advanced Reach as consumers get involved with media exposure and advertising and become aware of functionality and features
Aqua-Fresh’s Flex was the only launch that explicitly focussed on gum health and was able to experience a higher growth than industry leaders (Oral-B and J&J). - Aqua-Fresh is a recent entrant in the toothbrush category, Colgate has an
established name in the industry - Advertising budget is doubled than that of Smithkline Beecham
7
Colgate Precision should increase its advertising ahead of its competition in order to successfully support the launch of its innovation.
Increased Exposure
Increased Enthusiasm
Increased Product
Knowledge
Increased Trial/Usage
1992 1993 1994
Media $9,623,000 (11%) $ 21,856,296 (21%) $ 30,598,814 (20%)
Consumer Promotions $6,978,000 (8%) $ 13,113,778 (12%) $ 18,359,289 (12%)
Trade Promotions $7,457,000 (8%) $ 8,742,518 (8%) $ 12,239,526 (8%)
Reach was estimated to spend $17.1M and Oral-B was estimated to spend $11.2M on media expenditures to support the launch of their product. With this advertising budget, Colgate can expect the highest share voice %, resulting in increased exposure.
-Increased total advertising by 40% every year for two years -Results of overall promotional efforts seen in 1994
Total Colgate 1992 1993 1994
Net Income $7,732,624 $6,149,818 $16,008,443
8
Media expenditures, consumer and trade promotions are fundamental to Precision’s success as a market leader.
Profitable Market Leader
Trade Promotions
Floorstands and Sidekicks throughout the store (82% unplanned purchases)
Leverage being leader in toothpaste category
Increase purchase frequency to 3 months (No BOGO)
Consumer Promotions
Increased product education Encourage Trial Usage In-store sampling with dentist
professionals
Media Expenditures
Increase awareness and perceived value
Presence higher than competitors Health Magazine, ADA
Ensure a leading position in
competitive media market
Increase presence in store to increase category visibility and fuel demand
Increase product enthusiasm through consumer sampling
9
With a competitive price strategy at $1.80 in the first year, and $1.85 in the second year, Colgate can expect to be an appealing offering to retailers.
Research suggests that: - Consumers are willing to pay a premium for new
products addressing issues regarding the health of their gums
- Relatively unfamiliar with prices - Even at a ‘20% Price Premium to Oral-B Prevent
Gum Disease’, 61% were still probably going to buy precision in the concept testing
Manufacturer
Net Price
Super-premium
Oral-B Indicator $1.92
Oral-B Regular $1.78
Crest Complete $1.67
Reach Advanced $1.66
Aquafresh Flex $1.61
Professional
Colgate Plus $1.35
Reach Regular $1.30
Pepsodent Prof. $1.08
Value
Colgate Classic $0.69
Pepsodent Regular $0.48
Colgate Precision
Why Colgate can demand a higher price than $1.76: - Based on existing product offerings in professional and value,
Colgate has been a more expensive product - Should be lower than Oral-B Indicator to be appealing to retailers,
but higher than Oral-B Regular, as it is a super premium product
The increase in price by 10% in year 2 is justifiable because: - Precision will be more established in the market - Less discount will be necessary and Precision will sell on the basis of
its features - Established demand in the market in year 1, will increase appeal for
retailers - The price will still be less than Oral-B’s super premium product
Placement in stores between Oral-B Indicator and Johnson and Johnson’s Advanced Reach. Price is not justified as indicator bristles are less of a concern for consumers than gum disease prevention.
10
Colgate’s Precision toothbrush’s UVC should expect a decrease in comparison to its existing products.
1989 1990 1991 1992E
Unit sales ('000s) 55,296 63,576 70,560 78,336
Net sales ($'000s) 43,854 (100%) 57,248 (100%) 77,001 (100%) 91,611 (100%)
Cost of sales 23,988 (55%) 28,190 (49%) 36,827 (48%) 44,846 (49%)
Colgate’s historical cost of goods sold for all toothbrush product lines have consistently stayed at approximately the same percentage of sales.
Suggested Prediction
Manufacturer Per Unit Price $0.64 $0.77
Manufacturer Price $1.76 (36%) $1.80 (43%)
1993 1994
Unit sales ('000s) 73,748 95,676
Net sales ($'000s) 105,329 (100%) 156,227 (100%)
Cost of sales 49,506 (47%) 70,676 (45%) However, with moving Precision’s manufacturing with Plus, Colgate can expect economies of scale.
11
Over the two year period, Colgate can expect a return on its investment for the Precision product line.
Based on required quantity of 19, 492, 811 in year 1 and 51, 809, 838 in year 2. The Total Investment Cost Amounts to $9,550,000 for the first two years of launching Precision.
12
Appendix 1: Market Size
13
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Population 246,820,000 249,620,000 252,980,000 256,510,000 259,075,100 261,665,851
Retail Units Sold
(Exhibit 13)
243,000,000
242,000,000
261,000,000
307,000,000
-
-
Methodology:
Retail units sold
% of total retail market
Number of toothbrushes in the market
Number of toothbrushes/person/year
Number of people who use toothbrushes
Population in that year
= Number of toothbrushes in the market
= Number of people who use toothbrushes
= % of people who use toothbrushes
1989 1990 1991 1992
Percent of
People who Use
a Toothbrush
88%
86%
92%
85%
On average, 88% of people use toothbrushes
Appendix 2: Advertising Budget Allocation
14
1992 1993 1994
Fixed Costs $35,481,000 $49,673,400 $69,542,760
1992 1993 1994
Fixed Overhead (12%)
Total Advertising
$4,257,720
$31,223,280
$5,960,808
$43,712,592
$8,345,131
$61,197,629
1992
Media (40%)
Consumer Promotions (29%)
Trade Promotions (31%)
$12,489,312
$9,054,751
$9,679,217
1993 1994
Media (50%)
Consumer Promotions (30%)
Trade Promotions (20%)
$21,856,296
13,113,778
$8,742,518
$30,598,814
$18,359,289
$12,239,526
Fixed Costs from 1992 are based on Exhibit 1 Increased by 40% in 1993 and 1994
1992 1993 1994
Revenue Media
Consumer Promotions
Trade Promotions
$84,732,596
15%
11%
11%
$105,329,402
21%
12%
8%
$156,227,387
20%
12%
8%
Significant increases in advertising in 1993 and 1994, with large proportions allocated to media expenditures.