1
CO 2 emissions sources: preliminary results from a Northern Wisconsin case study Claire Phillips 1 , Karis McFarlane 1 , Ankur Desai 2 , Brian LaFranchi 1 , David Risk 3 1 Lawrence Livermore Natlional Laboratory Livermore, CA cams.llnl.gov 2 Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin, Madiison, WI flux.aos.wisc.edu 3 Dept of Earth Sciences St. Francis Xavier University Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada www,fluxlab.ca Introduction Radiocarbon is a potential tracer for detecting contributions of soil CO 2 to whole forest emissions. We are monitoring the 14 C abundance in soil and whole ecosystem CO 2 emissions from a deciduous hardwood forest in Northern Wisconsin for three years. Questions: 1) How does soil-respired 14 C-CO 2 vary seasonally? With environment? 2) Can signals from soil-respired 14 C- CO 2 be detected in canopy emissions? 3) How do whole-forest emissions impact 14 CO 2 at the nearby WLEF 450 m radio tower? (LEF, Park Falls, WI) Flas samples at Willow Creek Eddy Covariance Tower (30 m) since early 2011 Approach Monitor respired CO 2 and 14 CO 2 at nested spatial scales. Subsurface sampling (4 pits, including a trenched pit, x 7 levels) allow us to partition soil CO 2 production by depth. Flask air samples of 14 CO 2 collected by NOAA-ESRL 1 at LEF tower (450 m) since early 2010… Soil emissions Depth of CO 2 production may influence temporal patterns Canopy emissions Impacts of soil on canopy 14 CO 2 not (yet) detected. Tall-tower dynamics Influence of fossil CO 2 apparent, but biology may matter too. Preliminary Conclusions Soil 14 CO 2 may vary moderately at seasonal timescales, and dynamics may relate to soil moisture. • No clear evidence of seasonal variation in whole-ecosystem respired 14 CO 2 ; however, additional data and method improvements are forthcoming. • Fossil fuel emissions have dominant impacts on atmospheric 14 CO 2 at high altitudes. However, other influences may be important, particularly during the summer. Soil 14 CO 2 is modern (post-bomb)throughout the soil profile, unlike bulk soil. Soil 14 CO 2 decreased following leaf fall, more resembling Ra. This is counter to expectation of greater autotrophic contributions when trees are active… …but vertical flux partitioning suggests a reason: less CO 2 originating from dry, shallow soil in late summer. While difficult to compare methods, soil and whole-ecosystem respiration were similar in magnitude. Nevertheless, there were no obvious Impacts of soil on canopy 14 CO 2 During nocturnal CO 2 buildup 14 C generally decreased = less soil bomb-C Nocturnal Keeling plots exhibited large scatter, determination of Reco end-member not possible. CO 2 corresponded with decreasing 14 C abundance and elevated levels of other anthropogenic gases. However, 14 C depletion was much lower than expected for pure fossil fuel additions, alone. 14 C depletion was especially low during the growing season (May-Sept), suggesting other factors may be important! This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344, the Wisconsin Focus on Energy and NSF# DEB-0845166. LLNL-POST-491850 1ppm increase= 0.25 ‰ depletion in summer 0.73 ‰ depletion in winter Forced Diffusion probes (4) measure soil surface flux Foliage dropped Foliag e on Theoretical fossil fuel depletion = 2.7‰ per 1ppm addition 1. J.B. Miller, S.J. Lehman, A.E. Andrews, J.D. Kofler (2011), University of Colorado, Institute of Alpine and Arctic Research (INSTAAR), Radiocarbon Composition of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (14CO2) from the NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Air Sampling Network, 2009-2011, Version: 2011-11- 10, This summer: will measure canopy 14 CO 2 profiles to characterize possible soil influences.

Claire Phillips 1 , Karis McFarlane 1 , Ankur Desai 2 , Brian LaFranchi 1 , David Risk 3

  • Upload
    cid

  • View
    53

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Using 14 C as a high-frequency tracer of forest CO 2 emissions sources: preliminary results from a Northern Wisconsin case study. Claire Phillips 1 , Karis McFarlane 1 , Ankur Desai 2 , Brian LaFranchi 1 , David Risk 3. Tall-tower dynamics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Claire Phillips 1 ,  Karis  McFarlane 1 ,  Ankur  Desai 2 , Brian LaFranchi 1 , David Risk 3

Using 14C as a high-frequency tracer of forest CO2 emissions sources: preliminary results from a Northern Wisconsin case studyClaire Phillips1, Karis McFarlane1, Ankur Desai2, Brian LaFranchi1, David Risk3

1 Lawrence Livermore Natlional LaboratoryLivermore, CAcams.llnl.gov

2 Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin,Madiison, WIflux.aos.wisc.edu

3 Dept of Earth SciencesSt. Francis Xavier UniversityAntigonish, Nova Scotia, Canadawww,fluxlab.ca

IntroductionRadiocarbon is a potential tracer for detecting contributions of soil CO2 to whole forest emissions. We are monitoring the 14C abundance in soil and whole ecosystem CO2 emissions from a deciduous hardwood forest in Northern Wisconsin for three years.

Questions:1) How does soil-respired 14C-CO2 vary seasonally? With environment?2) Can signals from soil-respired 14C-CO2 be detected in canopy emissions?3) How do whole-forest emissions impact 14CO2 at the nearby WLEF 450 m radio tower? (LEF, Park Falls, WI)

Flas samples at Willow Creek Eddy Covariance Tower (30 m) since early

2011

ApproachMonitor respired CO2 and 14CO2 at nested spatial scales.

Subsurface sampling (4 pits, including a trenched pit, x 7 levels) allow us to partition soil CO2 production by depth.

Flask air samples of 14CO2 collected by

NOAA-ESRL1 at LEF tower (450 m) since

early 2010…

Soil emissionsDepth of CO2 production may influence temporal patterns

Canopy emissions Impacts of soil on canopy 14CO2 not (yet) detected.

Tall-tower dynamicsInfluence of fossil CO2 apparent, but biology may matter too.

Preliminary Conclusions• Soil 14CO2 may vary moderately at seasonal

timescales, and dynamics may relate to soil moisture.

• No clear evidence of seasonal variation in whole-ecosystem respired 14CO2; however, additional data and method improvements are forthcoming.

• Fossil fuel emissions have dominant impacts

on atmospheric 14CO2 at high altitudes. However, other influences may be important, particularly during the summer.

Soil 14CO2 is modern (post-bomb)throughout the soil

profile, unlike bulk soil.

Soil 14CO2 decreased following leaf fall, more resembling Ra.

This is counter to expectation of greater autotrophic

contributions when trees are active…

…but vertical flux partitioning suggests a reason: less CO2

originating from dry, shallow soil in late summer.

While difficult to compare methods, soil and whole-ecosystem respiration were similar in magnitude.

Nevertheless, there were no obvious Impacts of soil on canopy 14CO2

During nocturnal CO2 buildup 14C generally decreased

= less soil bomb-C

Nocturnal Keeling plots exhibited large scatter,

determination of Reco end-member not possible.

CO2 corresponded with decreasing 14C abundance and elevated levels of other anthropogenic gases.

However, 14C depletion was much lower than expected for pure fossil fuel additions, alone.

14C depletion was especially low during the growing season (May-Sept), suggesting other factors may be important!

This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344, the Wisconsin Focus on Energy and NSF# DEB-0845166. LLNL-POST-491850

1ppm increase= 0.25 ‰ depletion in summer

0.73 ‰ depletion in winter

Forced Diffusion probes (4) measure soil surface flux

Foliage dropped

Foliage on

Theoretical fossil fuel depletion = 2.7‰ per 1ppm addition

1. J.B. Miller, S.J. Lehman, A.E. Andrews, J.D. Kofler (2011), University of Colorado, Institute of Alpine and Arctic Research (INSTAAR), Radiocarbon Composition of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (14CO2) from the NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Air Sampling Network, 2009-2011, Version: 2011-11-10,

This summer: will measure canopy 14CO2 profiles to characterize possible soil influences.