44
CHRONIC HEPATITIS B VIRUS Prospects for Cure Patrick T. F. Kennedy Reader in Hepatology & Consultant Hepatologist Blizard Institute, Barts and The London SMD, QMUL, London VIRAL HEPATITIS and CO-INFECTION with HIV Bucharest, Romania, 6-7 October, 2016

CHRONIC HEPATITIS B VIRUS Prospects for Cureregist2.virology-education.com/2016/2CEE/11_Kennedy.pdf · 2016. 10. 7. · CHRONIC HEPATITIS B VIRUS Prospects for Cure Patrick T. F

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • CHRONIC HEPATITIS B VIRUSProspects for Cure

    Patrick T. F. KennedyReader in Hepatology & Consultant Hepatologist

    Blizard Institute, Barts and The London SMD, QMUL, London

    VIRAL HEPATITIS and CO-INFECTION with HIVBucharest, Romania, 6-7 October, 2016

  • 350 million people worldwide

    with CHB

    80% of deaths in those infected at birth/early

    childhood

    25% of those infected in childhood develop

    cirrhosis or HCC

    >600,000 deaths per year

    Chronic HBV Infection

  • Unmet challenges in HBV therapy

    2

    3

    4

    Strategies to achieve HBsAg loss and ‘cure’1

    Defining treatment endpoints

    Reducing the risk of HCC

    Finite therapy options

  • Locarnini & Zoulim, Anitvir Ther 2010

    Chronic HBV Infection

  • NUC target

    Chronic HBV Infection

    Locarnini & Zoulim, Anitvir Ther 2010

  • NUC target

    Ideal therapytarget

    Chronic HBV Infection

    Locarnini & Zoulim, Anitvir Ther 2010

  • Natural history & disease phase

  • 0

    HBeAgAnti-HBe

    HB

    V D

    NA/

    HB

    sAg

    (log 1

    0IU

    /ml)

    ALT (IU/L)

    IMMUNE TOLERANT IMMUNE CLEARANCE IMMUNE CONTROL IMMUNE ESCAPE

    ALT HBV DNA

    Natural History & Disease Phase

    adapted from Gill & Kennedy; Clin Med 2015

  • 0

    HBeAgAnti-HBe

    HB

    V D

    NA/

    HB

    sAg

    (log 1

    0IU

    /ml)

    ALT (IU/L)

    IMMUNE TOLERANT IMMUNE CLEARANCE IMMUNE CONTROL IMMUNE ESCAPE

    ALT HBV DNA HBsAg

    Natural History & Disease Phase

    adapted from Gill & Kennedy; Clin Med 2015

  • Is our current understanding of natural history & disease phase

    accurate?

  • Evidence of immune activity in the ‘immune tolerant’ disease phase

    Kennedy/Bertoletti et al., Gastroenterology 2012

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    IT CA

  • Age (Years)

    % C

    D12

    7lo

    w P

    D1+

    CD

    8 T

    cel

    ls

    0 20 40 60 800

    2

    4

    6

    10

    14

    18P = .006

    Age (Years)%

    CD

    127l

    ow

    PD

    1+ C

    D4

    T c

    ells

    0 20 40 60 800

    2

    4

    6

    8P = .4383

    Evidence of immune activity in the ‘immune tolerant’ disease phase

    Kennedy/Bertoletti et al., Gastroenterology 2012

  • Evidence of liver damage in the ‘immune tolerant’ disease phase

    Mason/Kennedy et al., Gastroenterology 2016

  • Nuclear core positive hepatocytes differentiate ‘immune tolerant’ disease

    Mason/Kennedy et al., Gastroenterology 2016

  • Clonal hepatocyte expansion in ‘immune tolerant’ disease

    Mason/Kennedy et al., Gastroenterology 2016

  • Redefining disease phase in CHB

    Bertoletti & Kennedy, Cell & Mol.Immunol 2014

    Immune Tolerance Immune Clearance

    Non-Inflammatory Inflammatory

  • Treatment & management strategies

  • Current Treatment Regimes

    Peg-IFN

    NUCs

    • Immunomodulatory agent• HBsAg decline or loss• Moderate rate of relapse• Finite therapy• Use of stopping rules

    • Excellent viral suppression• Long term therapy• High barrier to resistance• Poor HBsAg reduction• ? Treatment endpoints

  • HBV Treatment regimesNucleos(t)ide Analogues (NUCs)

    Marcellin et al, Lancet 2015; Chang, et al. Hepatology 2010

    TENOFOVIR ENTECAVIR

  • Current therapies are non-curative

    • Peg-IFN sustained immune control, but only in a minority of patients1

    • HBeAg-negative & positive disease: – limited decline in HBsAg during NUC monotherapy2

    • Long-term viral suppression is achieved, but sustained immune control following treatment cessation is limited3

    1. EASL guidelines. J Hepatol 2012;57:167–85; 2. Zoutendijk R, et al. J Infect Dis 2011;204(3):415–8; 3. Hadziyannis SJ, et al. Gastroenterology 2012;143:629–36.

  • What are the available options…..

  • What are the available options…..

    Sequential therapy strategies

    Combination therapies

    Discontinuation of NUCs

    1

    2

    3

  • Sequential NUC Therapy

    * p=

  • Sequential NUC Therapy

    * p=

  • What are the available options…..

    Sequential therapy strategies

    Combination therapies

    Discontinuation of NUCs

    1

    2

    3

  • What are the available options…..

    Sequential therapy strategies

    Combination therapies

    Discontinuation of NUCs

    1

    2

    3

  • Can NUCs be discontinued after a period of consolidation therapy following HBeAg seroconversion?

    HBeAg positive disease

  • Can NUCs be discontinued after a period of consolidation therapy following HBeAg seroconversion?

    HBeAg positive disease

  • HBeAg negative disease

  • HBeAg Negative patientsVirally suppressed >24 months

    No evidence of cirrhosis

    4 weekly collection:Routine laboratory tests

    PBMC

    Immunoprofilingby CyTOF

    mRNA expression By NanoString

    by CyTOF

    T cell phenotypingby flow cytometry

    Ag-specific T cell analysisex vivo by CyTOFby flow cytometry

    Ag-specific T cell analysis after in vitro expansion by Elispot

    HBeAg negative diseaseImmune Profiling Study

  • Patient Profiles

    on NUC off NUC

    controllers: n = 2viral rebound: -hepatic flare: -

    partial controllers: n = 11viral rebound: +hepatic flare: -

    flare: n = 6viral rebound: +hepatic flare: +

    Non-Flare Flare

    Rivino*, Le Bert*, Gill*, et al., Manuscript in preparation* equal contribution

  • SFC

    /105

    cells

    SFC

    /105

    cells

    Increased frequency of HBV-specific T cell responses in ‘non-flare’ vs. flare patients prior to NUC discontinuation

    * equal contribution Rivino*, Le Bert*, Gill*, et al., Manuscript in preparation

  • Novel Strategies for HBsAg loss

    Bertoletti & Rivino, Curr Opin Infect Dis., 2014

  • Selective oral TLR Agonists in CHBTLR agonists enhance:•Production of IFN-γ and inflammatory cytokines like IL-12•Upregulation of costimulatory molecules such as CD80 and CD86•Induction of interferon stimulated genes

    Gs-9620, an oral TLR7 agonist in development for chronic

    viral hepatitis has demonstrated a potential for

    induction of an antiviral response with an acceptable

    adverse event profile

    GS-9620, an Oral Agonist of Toll-Like Receptor-7, Induces Prolonged Suppression of Hepatitis B Virus in Chronically Infected Chimpanzees.Lanford et al Gastroenterology 2013

    Gane et al, J Hepatol 2015Phase 1b safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GS-9620

  • GS-4774 (Tarmogen)

    Stubbs, et al. Nat Med 2001; Cereda, et al. Vaccine 2011; Francis et al Vaccine 2015

    CD4+

    CD8+

    GS-4774

    APC

    M X Large S (env) Core His 6

    GS-4774 Recombinant Antigen

    C8F17 fluorocarbon chain

    DensigenTM

    • ~ 30-40 amino acids long peptides• CD4+/CD8+ T cell epitopes • Net positive charge/Hydrophobicity

  • Effective T cells control virus Exhausted T cells loose control of virus

    CD8 T cells

    Infected hepatocytes Infected hepatocytes

    INF-γTNF-αIL-2

    GranzymePerforin

    ?Checkpoint blockade

    Reversal of T cell exhaustion

    The goal of checkpoint inhibitors

  • Lessons from cancer checkpoint inhibitor trials: PD-1

    APC

    PD-1PD-L1

    Exhausted T cell Re-invigorated T cell

    CytotoxicityPD-1/-L1blockade

    APC

  • Lessons from woodchuck hepadnaviral infection

    • Boosting of T and B cell immunity• Sustained viral suppression and sAg seroconversion

    Combining PD-1 blockade with therapeutic vaccination

  • Summary of future drug targets for HBV therapies

  • Summary• Better understanding & re-definition of disease phase in

    CHB is central to better treatment outcomes

    • Long term on-treatment viral suppression is standard ofcare – but suboptimal

    • Strategies to target cccDNA & achieve global immunerestoration will be critical to delivering cure in CHB

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSRoyal London Hospital

    Louise Payaniandy, Jo Schulz, Sally Thomas, Deva Payaniandy,

    William Tong

    Dimitra Peppa, Lorenzo Micco, Harsimran D. Singh,

    Mala K. Maini

    Graham R.FosterJyoti Hansi

    Upkar S. Gill

    Samuel Litwin,Yan Zhou, Suraj Peri

    William Mason

    Fox Chase Cancer Centre

    Blizard Institute, QMULRayne Institute, UCL Duke, NUS/SICS A* Star

    Elena Sandalova, Juandy Jo, Laura Rivino, Nina Le Bert, Evan Newell,

    Antonio Bertoletti

    ILS, Kings College

    Oltin Pop, Ivana CareyAlberto Quaglia

    Dianummer 1Dianummer 2Dianummer 3Dianummer 4Dianummer 5Dianummer 6Dianummer 7Dianummer 8Dianummer 9Dianummer 10Dianummer 11Dianummer 12Dianummer 13Dianummer 14Dianummer 15Dianummer 16Dianummer 17Dianummer 18Dianummer 19Dianummer 20Dianummer 21Dianummer 22Dianummer 23Dianummer 24Dianummer 25Dianummer 26Dianummer 27Dianummer 28Dianummer 29Dianummer 30Dianummer 31Dianummer 32Dianummer 33Dianummer 34Dianummer 35Dianummer 36Selective oral TLR Agonists in CHB�GS-4774 (Tarmogen)�Dianummer 39Dianummer 40Dianummer 41Dianummer 42Dianummer 43Dianummer 44