Charge Exchange Models for X-ray Spectroscopy with AtomDB v2.0 Randall Smith, Adam Foster & Nancy Brickhouse Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1

Charge Exchange Models for X-ray Spectroscopy with AtomDB v2.0 Randall Smith, Adam Foster & Nancy Brickhouse Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Slide 2 Back to basics! The total emissivity from a cubic centimeter is just given by the densities, velocities, and cross sections of various processes involved: Considering recombination only, we get: Building a CX model for X-ray Astrophysics Dielectronic Recombination Radiative RecombinationCharge Exchange Slide 3 In 1969, Allen & Dupree pointed out that dielectronic recombination dominated collisional ionization at high temperatures, although radiative recombination picks up at low temperatures. (there are exceptions) Building a CX model for X-ray Astrophysics Slide 4 Regardless of the exact value, CX swamps other processes by factors of 100 1000 If neutral H or He mixes with highly-ionized material, CX dominates (until the H, He is ionized) Building a CX model for X-ray Astrophysics Slide 5 Question: Why recombination only? Answer: If electron excitation is even remotely possible, it will tend to dominate the x-ray emission. Building a CX model for X-ray Astrophysics Slide 6 Upshot: An astrophysical plasma dominated by CX will have: ionized metals neutral hydrogen a rapid transition region Typical circumstances might involve a stellar wind CXing into the surrounding ISM, or shocked SNe ejecta (unshocked is cold) hitting a molecular cloud. Building a CX model for X-ray Astrophysics Slide 7 Highly-ionized plasmas dont wait Smith & Hughes 2010 Consider an ion Z +q created in a stellar wind or a supernova shock, travelling at 300 km/s. At a minimum, it has q electrons nearby to ensure charge neutrality. At a density of 0.1 cm -3 it will travel Building a CX model for X-ray Astrophysics At T e > 410 4 K, hydrogen is 99.9% ionized. At T e ~10 6 K, electrons outnumber neutral hydrogen by more than a million to one. In thermal equilibrium v e ~ 43 v H If the electrons are in a Boltzmann distribution and the plasma is ionized, then and, dominating the fact that : Slide 26 Are we Boltzmann yet? or What are the relevant time constants? For CX, scaled to v=300 km/s, = 10 -15 cm 2 : Electrons & protons reach a Boltzmann distribution and Hydrogen ionizes in: (where kT e = 35 eV thermal equivalent of 100 km/s velocity) Summers+ 2006 Slide 27 What about Do proper cross sections matter? Not that much, unless you have detailed information about the distribution of the ion and neutral components.* We do know that the CX cross section is sufficiently large that when ions and neutrals are able to CX, they will. If CX can happen, it will. * Relative rates do matter Slide 28 Recombining plasmas are inefficient Creating a 0.654 keV O VIII photon via: Electron excitation: requires 0.654 keV of electron energy, O 7+ ion remains Recombination: requires 0 keV electron energy, but destroys the O 8+ ion that required 0.87 keV to create. But most importantly: Electron excitation and recombination can co-exist in a plasma; Electron excitation and CX cannot.