31
1 Astrophysical black Astrophysical black holes holes Chris Reynolds Department of Astronomy

Astrophysical black holes

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Astrophysical black holes. Chris Reynolds Department of Astronomy. Topics. Observational evidence for black holes X-ray studies of strong-gravity region First observational studies of BH spin Future directions. Observational evidence for black holes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Astrophysical black holes

1

Astrophysical black holesAstrophysical black holes

Chris ReynoldsDepartment of Astronomy

Page 2: Astrophysical black holes

2

TopicsTopics

Observational evidence for black holesX-ray studies of strong-gravity regionFirst observational studies of BH spinFuture directions

Page 3: Astrophysical black holes

3

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 4: Astrophysical black holes

4

QuickTime™ and aAnimation decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 5: Astrophysical black holes

5

Observational evidence for Observational evidence for black holesblack holes

Early X-ray observations [1965] discovered a powerful X-ray source in Cygnus

Cygnus X-1– Binary star system… black

hole in orbit around a massive O-star

– Black hole mass 7-13 M– X-rays produced due to

accretion of stellar wind from O-star

– 2kpc away

Page 6: Astrophysical black holes

6

How do we know the black How do we know the black hole mass?hole mass?

Period 5.6 days K = V sin i = 75km/s Newtonian analysis…

– MBH>f– Cyg X-1… f=0.24MBH

Feed in knowledge of i and companion mass… M=7-13Msun

6 “golden” cases with f>3Msun

Brocksopp et al. (1998)

Page 7: Astrophysical black holes

7

Page 8: Astrophysical black holes

8

Page 9: Astrophysical black holes

9A. Ghez (UCLA)

Strong evidence for a 3-4 million solar mass BH at the Galactic Center (closest stellar approach only 40AU!)

Page 10: Astrophysical black holes

10Chandra+VLA image of GC (Baganoff et al. 2001)

X-ray studies of black holesX-ray studies of black holes

Page 11: Astrophysical black holes

11

MCG-6-30-15 (Seyfert gal)(LX~1036 W)

3C273 (Quasar)LX ~1038 W

Page 12: Astrophysical black holes

12

Page 13: Astrophysical black holes

13

X-ray “reflection” imprints well-defined features in the spectrum

Page 14: Astrophysical black holes

14

Page 15: Astrophysical black holes

15

Relativistic effects imprint characteristic profile Relativistic effects imprint characteristic profile on the emission line…on the emission line…

Iron line profile inMCG-6-30-15

Page 16: Astrophysical black holes

16MCG-6-30-15 Suzaku(Miniutti et al. 2006)

Page 17: Astrophysical black holes

17

Also see Suzaku results on broad iron lines at this meeting:• MCG-5-23-16 (Reeves et al.)• NGC 3516 (Markowitz et al.)

Systematic surveys of the XMM archive are showing that ~1/2 of type-1 AGN show broad iron lines (largely confirming ASCA results)

MCG-5-23-16 (Dewangan 2003)

NGC2992

IRAS 18325 (Iwasawa 2004)

Page 18: Astrophysical black holes

18

Page 19: Astrophysical black holes

19Brenneman & Reynolds (2006)

Assuming no emission from within rms

a>0.987 (formal 90% limit)

XMM analysis of MCG-6-30-15

Page 20: Astrophysical black holes

20

Black Hole Quasi-periodic Black Hole Quasi-periodic oscillationsoscillations

High-frequency QPOs– Comparable frequency to

orbital frequency in inner accretion flow

– Often found in pairs with 3:2 ratio

Stable frequencies– probably determined by

gravitational potential– Could be an excellent probe

of the mass and spin!!

Page 21: Astrophysical black holes

21

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 22: Astrophysical black holes

22

Page 23: Astrophysical black holes

23

QPO theoryQPO theory Lack of standard QPO

theoretical framework is problem

Global modes of accretion disk– “Diskoseismology”; Wagoner,

Nowak, Kato…– Produce g-, p-, and c-modes– Linear theory… no natural

explanation for 3:2 ratio Resonance model

– Parametric resonance between vertical/radial epicyclic frequencies (Abramowicz & Kluzniak)

– Source of free energy?

Fundamental g-mode (Nowak & Wagoner)Movie by Mike Nowak

Page 24: Astrophysical black holes

24

The Future of BH X-ray StudiesThe Future of BH X-ray Studies

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Armitage & Reynolds (2004)

Dynamical timescale variability… probes orbital motions in accretion disk

Page 25: Astrophysical black holes

25

Powerful probe of turbulent disk physics. Also, arcs approximately trace test-particle Keplerian orbits in = plane.

Iwasawa et al. (2004)

Page 26: Astrophysical black holes

26

Light crossing timescale allows reverberation effects to be studied.

Page 27: Astrophysical black holes

27Chandra Deep Field

Page 28: Astrophysical black holes

28

Constellation-X simulations…Constellation-X simulations…

Simulated 100ks; F2-10=10-12erg/s/cm2 Simulated 1Ms; z=1; F2-10=10-14erg/s/cm2

~4 such source per Con-X field

Page 29: Astrophysical black holes

29

Imaging a black holeImaging a black holemm-VLBImm-VLBI

Page 30: Astrophysical black holes

30

Imaging a black holeImaging a black holeMicro-arcsecond X-ray Imaging Micro-arcsecond X-ray Imaging

Mission (MAXIM)Mission (MAXIM)

HST (0.1 arcsec)

MAXIM (0.05 -arcsec)

Page 31: Astrophysical black holes

31

~20,000 km

Current MAXIM conceptCurrent MAXIM conceptGroup and package Primary and Secondary Mirrors as “Periscope” Pairs

•“Easy” Formation Flying (microns)

•All s/c act like thin lenses- Higher Robustness

•Possibility to introduce phase control within one space craft- an x-ray delay line- More Flexibility

•Offers more optimal UV-Plane coverage- Less dependence on Detector Energy Resolution

•Each Module, self contained- Lower Risk.

~500-1000 m Baseline

A scalable MAXIM concept.