Upload
eagle-settlements
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Â
Citation preview
Change in legislation for Minnesota by Claudia Green ([email protected])
It would seem that Minnesota is going to be changing its current
legislation in regard to selling structured settlements as of August 1
2014. The reason for this change is to try and ensure that structured
settlement annuitants are better protected than they presently are by
making judges aware and giving them access to the previous
transaction history an annuitant may have. The new legislation has
been authored by Rep. Debra Hilstrom.
As Hilstom puts it, "this really is a consumer protection issue. This is
to make sure everyone knows and understands the consequences of
these sales, and so a judge can really evaluate whether or not
someone in a stressful situation knows what they're getting into."
Under current Minnesota legislation, there has been no requirement
for judges to be made aware of or have access to the prior
transaction history an annuitant may have with regard to
selling structured settlement annuity payments. As a result, some
cases have been approved by judges which, if they had actually
known the prior transaction history, they potentially would have
denied instead.
There was a particular case in Minneapolis a few years ago which
highlighted this flaw in the legislation. A lady who had been awarded
a structured settlement as a result of lead poisoning in childhood
came before a judge wanting to sell a large amount of her settlement
payments. The judge decided to appoint a guardian ad litem and it
was subsequently found that the annuitant had already sold a huge
amount of her structured settlement payments in two prior
transactions. As a result, her monthly periodic payments had been
drastically reduced to a pittance in comparison to what they originally
were.
This new legislation in Minnesota will hopefully ensure that
annuitants wanting to sell structured settlement payments are not
ripped off by unscrupulous factoring companies who are purely
concerned with how much profit they make. At Eagle Settlements, we
frequently hear of situations in which other structured
settlement factoring companies take advantage of vulnerable
annuitants. I fully appreciate that a business needs to make a profit,
but I do not accept that this should be done at the expense of
someone down on their luck. I for one am, therefore, fully behind the
new legislation in Minnesota. Anything that can protect an annuitant
cannot be a bad thing.