35
Effects of MPB on hydrology and post-attack vegetation dynamics Principal investigators: Uldis Silins and Ellen Macdonald, Ph.D. projects: Anne McIntosh and Pablo Piña Lead field technician: Pete Presant

Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

https://foothillsri.ca/sites/default/files/null/CEP_2009_11_Prsnttn_MPB-EcoHydrology-FRI-BrownBag-20Nov2009.pdf

Citation preview

Page 1: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Effects of MPB on hydrology and post-attack vegetation dynamics

Principal investigators: Uldis Silins and Ellen Macdonald,

Ph.D. projects: Anne McIntosh and Pablo Piña

Lead field technician: Pete Presant

Page 2: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Annual hydrograph

Waskahegan River

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Str

ea

mfl

ow

(m

3/s

)

1997

1998

?

Time

Re

lative

im

pa

ct

Page 3: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Approach

Don’t wait for MPB (issue of “control”; B.C.)

Simulate MPB attack – variable density herbicide treatment

Stand level research – processes affected by MPB

Forest water balance – how much extra water is produced ?

Short term vegetation responses – potential for compensation, recovery

Combination of

1. Before-After: Treatment:Control approach: Water balance research

2. Replicated stand level: Understory vegetation dynamics research

Treatment

Control

After Before

Page 4: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Main Plots = 120 x 180 m (2.2 ha) 4 treatments (below) x 2.2 ha = 8.8 ha total

Stand water balance subplot (80 x 80 m; 0.64 ha)

Vegetation subplot (80 x 60 m; 0.48 ha)

Control (undisturbed) 50% MPB kill 100% MPB kill Salvage logged (harvested) plot

- no trees left standing

* 1 tree height (20m) exterior buffer between measurement plots & adjecent stand in all plots

Additional replicated plots for vegetation work = 120 x 100 m (1.2 ha ea) 4 treatments (below) x 2 replicates = 9.6 ha total

Control (undisturbed) 50% MPB kill 100% MPB kill Salvage logged (harvested) plot

- no trees left standing

Study duration 3 yr. (1 yr pre-treatment, 2 yr. post-treatment)

Main Plots = 120 x 180 m (2.2 ha) 4 treatments (below) x 2.2 ha = 8.8 ha total

Stand water balance subplot (80 x 80 m; 0.64 ha)

Vegetation subplot (80 x 60 m; 0.48 ha)

Control (undisturbed) 50% MPB kill 100% MPB kill Salvage logged (harvested) plot

- no trees left standing

* 1 tree height (20m) exterior buffer between measurement plots & adjecent stand in all plots

Additional replicated plots for vegetation work = 120 x 100 m (1.2 ha ea) 4 treatments (below) x 2 replicates = 9.6 ha total

Control (undisturbed) 50% MPB kill 100% MPB kill Salvage logged (harvested) plot

- no trees left standing

Study duration 3 yr. (1 yr pre-treatment, 2 yr. post-treatment)

1 year pre-treatment measurements

2 years post-treatment measurements

x 2

x 1

12

stands

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

2007 2008 2009 2010

Post-Treatment Year 2

2011 2012

Analysis, write-upSurveying-layout, set up - instrumentation Pre-Treatment year Post-Treatment Year 1

Page 5: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

• Pure pine 120 yrs.

• Medium site index

• 24-26 m height

Page 6: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

2007 2008 2009 2010

Post-Treatment Year 2

2011 2012

Analysis, write-upSurveying-layout, set up - instrumentation Pre-Treatment year Post-Treatment Year 1

Page 7: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

2007 2008 2009 2010

Post-Treatment Year 2

2011 2012

Analysis, write-upSurveying-layout, set up - instrumentation Pre-Treatment year Post-Treatment Year 1

Page 8: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Post-attack hydrologic response

1. Changes in overstory rainfall interception.

2. Changes individual tree & stand level transpiration

- Can surviving trees compensate (use more water)

3. Changes in forest floor and soil moisture storage

4. Changes in water table level, groundwater

How much extra water is produced after different levels of “red attack” ?

Page 9: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Gross precipitation + Evaporative demand

Overstory transpiration

Canopy interception

Page 10: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Rainfall interception

Rainfall event size

Inte

rce

ption (

mm

)

Page 11: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Rainfall interception

66 %

= 633 mm

Page 12: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Stemflow

Throughfall

6 m

Litter interception

Rainfall interception

Page 13: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Rainfall interception

Page 14: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Rainfall interception

43%

Page 15: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Individual tree & canopy transpiration

Page 16: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Individual tree & canopy transpiration

Page 17: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

20%

Individual tree & canopy transpiration

Page 18: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

On a daily basis an average tree

transpires 5.5 liters, that is about 0.7

liters per ground square meter.

During the growing season:

• ≈ 57% of precipitation is

intercepted by the canopy

• 20% of precipitation leaves as

transpiration

• Forest floor interception?

• Understory evaporation?

•Soil moisture storage?

What will happen when the MPB kills the trees?

Page 19: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Stand level (canopy) transpiration

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

1 6 11 16 21 2 7 12 17 22 3 8 13 18 23 4 9 14 19 24 5 10 15 20 1 6 11 16 21

235 236 237 238 239 240

mm

/day

50k

100k

control

Page 20: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Stand level (canopy) transpiration

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

1 6 11 16 21 2 7 12 17 22 3 8 13 18 23 4 9 14 19 24 5 10 15 20 1 6 11 16 21

235 236 237 238 239 240

mm

/day

50k

100k

control

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

1 6 11 16 21 2 7 12 17 22 3 8 13 18 23 4 9 14 19 24 5 10 15 20 1 6 11 16 21

220 221 222 223 224 225

mm

/day

Julian day

100 Kill

50 k

clearcut

Page 21: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Post-attack vegetation response

1. Changes in overstory forest structure.

2. Changes in understory plant community composition (shrubs, seedlings, vascular plants, bryophytes).

3. Recruitment of downed woody debris (DWD).

4. Changes in below-ground processes (nutrient availability, microbial community, decomposition).

What is the early trajectory of post-attack response (advanced growth, understory

vegetation) after different levels of “red attack” ?

Page 22: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009
Page 23: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

23

Objective 1: Overstory

Characterize the overstory forest structure (0.02 ha plots)

• Species

• Live status

• Dbh

• Height

• Crown Vigor

• Cover (hemispherical photos)

Page 24: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

24

Pre-treatment - Overstory Basal Area vs Block

Block

HTL NRH PSH

Ba

sa

l a

rea (

m2

/ha

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Live

Dead

Basal Area

Page 25: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

25

Pre-treatment - Overstory TPH vs Block

Block

HTL NRH PSH

Tre

es p

er

Hecta

re

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Live

Dead

Trees Per Ha

Page 26: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

26

Pre-treatment - Overstory

Mean dbh vs block

Block

HTL NRH PSH

Me

an

db

h (

cm

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

All

live

dead

Mean DBH

Page 27: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

27

Objective 2: Understory

Quantify differences in the understory

plant community composition

Seedlings/Saplings (pine)

Vascular plants (shrubs, forbs, graminoids)

Non-vascular plants (bryophytes, lichens)

Abundance (% cover) and richness by

species

Page 28: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Mean Cover by Block (+/- SE)

Block

HTL NRH PSH

Me

an

co

ve

r o

f q

ua

dra

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Pre-treatment - Understory

28

Cover

Page 29: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Mean Richness by Block (+/- SE)

Block

HTL NRH PSH

Me

an

sp

ecie

s r

ich

ne

ss o

f q

ua

dra

t

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Pre-treatment - Understory

29

Quadrat Richness

Page 30: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Pre-treatment - Understory

Block

HTL NRH PSH

Sp

ecie

s R

ich

ne

ss

0

20

40

60

80

100

Quadrats

Species census

Total Richness

Page 31: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

31

Objective 3:

Downed Woody Debris

Quantify DWD

Transects: biomass

estimates

(Megagrams/ha)

Page 32: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

32

Mean Fuel (+/- SE) by Block

Block

HTL NRH PSHDead w

oody d

ebris (

Megagra

ms/h

a)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Pre-treatment – Downed Woody Debris

Fuel Biomass

Page 33: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

33

Objective 4: Below-Ground

Quantify differences in below-ground attributes

Decomposition (cellulose paper in mesh bags)

Microbial biochemical activity & biomass

Community-level physiological profiles (CLPP)

Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis

Nutrient availability (PRS probes)

Soil moisture (TDR)

Stay Tuned!

Page 34: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

The Future?

Page 35: Cep 2009 11 prsnttn mpb ecohydrology fri brownbag 20nov2009

Support for the work

Foothills Research Institute

FRIAA / AB SRD

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.

Milo Mihajlovich

…Thank you for listening

Coming years …

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

2007 2008 2009 2010

Post-Treatment Year 2

2011 2012

Analysis, write-upSurveying-layout, set up - instrumentation Pre-Treatment year Post-Treatment Year 1