CENTRE NATIONAL D'ETUDES SPATIALES VG-AP-211 …emits.sso.esa.int/emits-doc/ESRIN/AO4412En-VG-AP-21… · · 2010-01-13centre national d'etudes spatiales sous-direction d ... for

SYAC0001903.21A MECA Version validée SDS Imprimé le 15 / 04 / 03

CENTRE NATIONAL D'ETUDES SPATIALES

Sous-Direction Développements Sol

18, Avenue Edouard-Belin 31401 TOULOUSE Cedex 4

Rond-point de l'Espace 91023 EVRY Cedex

SDS/G BP 254 - 97377 KOUROU CEDEX

CODE IDENTIFICATION PROJET

VG-AP-211-C-0007-CNES

EDITION : 2 REVISION : 1

Date édition ou dernière révision :11/04/03

REF. D'AUTEUR :SDS/AP/SY-0019

CLASSE : 1 CATEGORIE : 1

RESERVE A L'INDUSTRIEL

PROJET : VEGA GROUND SEGMENT

TITRE DU DOCUMENT :

MECHANICAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACT PRODUCT ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND

TASKS

NOM & FONCTION DATE & SIGNATURE

PREPARE PAR :

A. CUENCA Mechanical

Infrastructure QA manager

A. DESROCHES RAMS manager

POUR APPROBATION : A.RAGOT

VEGA GS PA manager

POUR ACCEPTATION :

T.FIGEAC Technical officer

M.VALES

Project coordinator

APPLICATION AUTORISEE

PAR :

M. PANICUCCI

VEGA PA manager

M CARDONE

VEGA GS Manager

LISTE DE DIFFUSION Nb A I

SDS/SG/MS/BT 1 X

Les signataires +

ESA/IPT D.COULON

ESA/IPT J.M MONTHILLER

ESA/HQ E.LEFORT

ESA/ESTEC J.PINEL

SDS/PL

SDS/AP/MR

SDS/AP/G

CG/SDP/SE B.SALVETAT

SDS/PL/SV

A=Action I=Information



Sous-Direction Développements Sol

18, Avenue Edouard-Belin 31401 TOULOUSE Cedex 4

Rond-point de l'Espace 91023 EVRY Cedex

SDS/G BP 254 - 97377 KOUROU CEDEX

LANGUE :Fr EDITION : 2 REVISION : 1

DATE D'EDITION OU DERNIERE REVISION : 11/04/03

CODE IDENTIFICATION PROJET


FICHE SIGNALETIQUE

FICHIER INFORMATIQUE

C:\Data\D COULON Data\Data VEGA\Projet IPT\Ground Segment\Documents GS\GS Statement Of Work\SOW Méca\ITT

FINAL\EMITS\CNES SDS Docs\ENGLISH Docs\SYAC0001903.21A MECA.doc

Nombre de pages totales (y/c annexes et pages de garde) :

Nb de pages annexes :

TITRE :

MECHANICAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACT PRODUCT ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS

NOM (S) AUTEUR (S) A. CUENCA Infrastructure QA manager A. DESROCHES RAMS manager

TYPE DE DOCUMENT

PRODUCT ASSURANCE

CLASSEMENT PHYSIQUE N° MARCHE CLASSE : 1

CATEGORIE : 1

RESUME D'AUTEUR

This document provides Product Assurance Requirements and Tasks to be applied by Mechanical Infrastructure Industrial Contractor for VEGA Ground segment.

FOR APPLICABLE AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS, WHEN YOU READ ONE OF THESE FOLLOWING WORDINGS : CNES/DLA/SDS, CNES OR SDS, IT IS NECESSARY TO REMOVE THIS WORDING BY CUSTOMER.

MOTS CLES (mis par l'auteur) RESERVE AUX INDUSTRIELS

- VEGA project - Quality Assurance - RAMS - Mechanical infrasructure



Titre du document : MECHANICAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACT

PRODUCT ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS

Sous-direction Développements Sol


Page : 3/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

EDITION REVISION DATE OBJET DE LA MODIFICATION

1 0 07/02/2003 Original issue Working document no signed and no distributed.

2 0 28/03/03 • Taking into account asking from ESA/IPT relevant to DRL and DRD to transfer in Management Specifications document

• Comments made during pre-TEB : taking into account Functional Requirements Document as Applicable Document and adding appendices

Working document no signed and no distributed

2 1 11/04/03 • Removed DS-MP-AQ-01

• Corrected some mistakes







Page : 4/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

SOMMAIRE 1. SUBJECT .............................................................................................................................................................................5

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS...........................................................................................................................................5

2.1. GENERAL DOCUMENTS ..................................................................................................................................................5 2.2. QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTS ..............................................................................................................................5 2.3. RAMS DOCUMENTS......................................................................................................................................................6

3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS............................................................................................................................................6

4. GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................7

5. PA RELATIONSHIP ..........................................................................................................................................................8

6. QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS ...................................................................................................................9

6.1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS...........................................................................................................................9 6.2. TAILORED REQUIREMENTS TASKS.................................................................................................................................9 6.3. DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT LIST (DRL) ............................................................................................................17 6.4. DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT DEFINITION (DRD) ..........................................................................................................17

7. DEPENDABILITY REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS...................................................................................................18

7.1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ...........................................................................................................................................18 7.2. TAILORED REQUIREMENTS TASKS...............................................................................................................................18 7.3. REMINDER OF SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................21

7.3.1. Reminder of severity classes...................................................................................................................................21 7.3.2. Reminder of qualitative objectives .........................................................................................................................21

7.4. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................22 7.4.1. Air-conditioning sub-system...................................................................................................................................22

7.4.1.1. Qualitative requirements ..................................................................................................................................................22 7.4.1.2. Quantitative requirements ................................................................................................................................................22

7.5. DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT LIST (DRL) ............................................................................................................25 7.6. DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT DOCUMENT (DRD) ................................................................................................25

8. SAFETY REGULATIONS...............................................................................................................................................26

8.1. REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS.........................................................................................................................................26 8.2. DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT LIST..................................................................................................................................26 8.3. DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................26

APPENDIX A1 – CRITICAL ITEM FORM...........................................................................................................................28

APPENDIX A2 –ECR (CHANGE REQUEST) FORM..........................................................................................................28

APPENDIX A3 –REQUEST FOR WAIVER FORM .............................................................................................................28

APPENDIX A4- NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT FORM ................................................................................................28

APPENDIX A5 - CRITICAL ITEMS LIST FORM ...............................................................................................................28







Page : 5/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

1. SUBJECT This document provides the product assurance requirements to be applied by the Mechanical Infrastructure Industrial Contractor.

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1. General documents (AD1) CSG-RS-10A-CN

Safety regulations - General rules (AD2) CSG-RS-21A-CN

Safety regulations - Ground installations specific rules (AD3) CSG-RS-24A-CN

Safety regulations - Inter-sites specific rules Not available in English version - French version identification is CSG-RS-240-CN

(AD4) VG-RS-2-C-0002-CNES Works site regulations

(AD5) VG-SM-211-C-0004-CNES Technical Management Requirements and Tasks

(AD6) VG-AP-2-C-0006-CNES Functional classification of VEGA ground segment means

(AD7) to (AD9) Intentionally not used

2.2. Quality Assurance Documents (AD10) DS-MP-AQ-05

Quality control plans (AD11) DS-MP-AQ-06

Industrial qualification reviews and industrial acceptance reviews (AD12) DS-MP-AQ-07

Non-conformances, anomalies and waivers management (AD13) DS-MP-AQ-09

Action items and pending points management (AD14) DS-MP-AQ-11

Guide for drafting accompanying documentation (AD15) DS-MP-AQ-15

Temporary transfer procedure (AD16) DS-MP-AQ-04

Processing of products qualification and process validation (AD17) to (AD19) Intentionally not used







Page : 6/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

2.3. RAMS Documents (AD20) DS-MP-SF-04

Guide for management of system safety and maintainability analysis activities

(AD21) DS-MP-SF-06 Rules for human errors prevention

(AD22) DS-MP-SF-10 Critical points management

(AD33) DS-MP-SF-12 Dependability qualitative rules

3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS (RD1) VG-SF-2-C-0004-CNES

Preliminary hazard analysis VEGA - Ground Segment (RD2) Intentionally not used (RD3) MPM-030-00-02

Project Reviews organisation (RD4) DS-MP-AQ-10

Qual ity Requirements Applicable to Software (RD5) VG-SF-2-C-0005-CNES

List of dependability sheets per contract (RD6) VG-SM-21x-C-0002-CNES

Management Requirements (Technical part) applicable to VEGA ground segment - Items 7 and 9 (PA) : RAMS part and Quality part

(RD7) VG-SOW-2-C-001-IPT VEGA Ground Segment System Engineering Statement of Work Issue 3, Revision 0 – 31/01/2003







Page : 7/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

4. GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS CDR Critical Design Review CNES Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (French Space Agency) ECR Engineering Change Request (PM) DRB Delivery Review Board FAR Final Acceptance Review FTRR Factory Tests Readiness Review FTRB Factory Tests Review Board IAR Industrial Acceptance Review ICDR Industrial Critical Design Review IPDR Industrial Preliminary Design Review IQR Industrial Qualification Review KIP Key Inspection Point KOM Kick - Off Meeting LLI Long lead Item MIP Mandatory Inspection Point OSTRR On Site Tests Readiness Review OSTRB On Site Tests Review Board FTRR Factory Tests Readiness Review FTRB Factory Tests Review Board PA Product Assurance PVRI Procès-Verbal de Réception Industrielle QA Quality Assurance QR Qualification Review RAMS Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety SDS Sous-Direction Développement Sol (Ground Segment Sub-Directorate)







Page : 8/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

5. PA RELATIONSHIP The PA industrial contractor manager reports to the QA Mechanical Infrastructure Manager who reports to the ESA/IPT PA manager (through PA Ground Segment Manager). The industrial contractor will not normally have direct links with ESA/IPT PA Manager except in some cases (through or with CNES/SDS) :

! major NCR treatment ! configuration management boards ! MIP/KIP ! audits

In the following text, the customer of the industrial contractor is ESA represented by the technical officer for technical matters.

ESA/IPT

CNES/SDS VEGA Ground Segment Technical Officer

VEGA Program Management

PA Manager

M.PANICUCCI

PA Ground Segment Manager

A.RAGOT

QA Mechanical Infrastructure Manager

A.CUENCA

RAMS Manager

A.DESROCHES







Page : 9/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

6. QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS 6.1. General requirements and tasks

The industrial contractor has to apply these requirements and to give its to his sub-contractors. He is in charge to check application of these requirements and to provide application visibility to the customer. The main quality assurance tasks to be provided by the industrial contractor are :

! To define product assurance organisation : means and tasks description in order to ensure quality requirements application. This product assurance organisation must be provided in quality assurance plan and submitted to customer approval.

! To ensure correct implementation of quality assurance requirements, during project phases : design, purchase, manufacturing and factory tests, installation, on site tests and validation and final acceptance operations with the customer for him and his sub-contractors.

! To ensure visibility to his customer on quality assurance aspects : main quality points, problems, difficulties, non-conformances, anomalies and waivers status, pending points and action items status, factory and site acceptances status,... To perform this task, he will, in particular, provide a quality assurance report at each progress meeting, at each review and for acceptance phases

6.2. Tailored Requirements Tasks Issued from (RD6)







Page : 11/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

Requirement number Requirement area Requirement text

902 Quality Assurance Industrial contractor must designate a PA manager, by name, at the beginning of the project and for the entire duration of this project. This PA manager must be hierarchically independent from the project.

904 Quality Assurance Plan

Industrial contractor must provide a Quality Assurance Plan explaining how the quality assurance requirements and tasks asked by the customer will be taken into account and applied

906 Quality Assurance Plan

Any quality assurance plan modification must be approved by the customer

910 Quality Assurance Industrial contractor must define the specific assurance quality requirements to his sub-contractors.

911 Quality Assurance Progress Report

Industrial contractor must provide a quality assurance report giving main quality points, non-conformances, anomalies and waivers status, pending points and actions status, factory and site acceptances status,…

912 Audits The customer could decide to implement an audit to check correct application of quality assurance requirements. He will be authorised to access in industrial contractor and sub-contractor premises

914 Audits Industrial contractor must implement preventive and corrective actions issued from audits and provide evidence on correct implementation.







Page : 12/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03


915 Audits Audits are conducted in accordance with an audit plan and a written procedure previously approved by the customer The results of each audit, and actions to be decided, are recorded in a report Quality audit reports are distributed by audit report writer to: - the party requesting the audit, - industrial contractor, where necessary, - entity audited, - customer.

916 Quality documentation

Industrial contractor PA manager must ensure that means and procedures are provided and performed in order to apply documentation management requirements asked by the customer. He will performs checks, at least by random way (documents codification, presentation, signatures validity, distribution dates, modifications management,…)

917 Configuration Control quality

Industrial contractor PA manager must ensure that means and procedures are provided and performed in order to apply configuration control management requirements asked by the customer

918 Actions items management quality

Industrial contractor PA manager must ensure that means and procedures are provided and performed in order to apply action items management requirements asked by the customer

919 Actions items management quality

Industrial contractor PA manager must ensure that action items closure are correctly implemented and provided evidences are in correspondence with action item problem resolution.

920 Purchasing quality Industrial contractor must check conformity between purchased items and requirements applied to these items (specific or on-shelf items). Acceptance checks for these items must be performed before use in industrial contractor or sub-contractor factory

922 Purchasing quality Industrial contractor must give the previous date of these checks one calendar week before. 924 Test and checks Inside of Manufacturing inspection flow chart, industrial contractor must give the main items, the main steps and

submission date to the customer







Page : 13/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03


926 Manufacturing inspection flow chart

Tests and checks results issued from manufacturing inspection flow chart must be registered and available for progress meetings and tests readiness review (on factory and on site) MIP and KIP selection is done in agreement with the customer.

928 Manufacturing inspection flow chart

Tests and checks of manufacturing inspection flow chart must be performed with procedures written before tests or checks. These procedures must describe the operation, the methodology and the expected results

930 Regulations Industrial contractor must apply on site rules : access and works site activities (see AD4) 931 Regulations Components and facilities must be consistent with mandatory directives, norms and rules applicable on French territory 932 Regulations Industrial contractor will provide, for the facilities relevant to applicable directives on French territory, a certificate

established by an official agreed organisation (buildings, electrical power, fluids parts,…) 934 On - shelf items Industrial contractor will provide a conformity certificate for on - shelf items and attached documents : industrial tests report,

user's manual, maintenance manual, incoming inspection report, relevant safety data sheet, compliance certificate, certificate EC regulations, spare part list.

936 Modified on - shelf items

Industrial contractor supplies on -shelf items with modifications, he must perform tests and checks in representative conditions (interface and environment) and provide the results in order to compare with requirements.

938 No standard items : no on-the-shelf items or on-the-shelf items modified

For no standard items, industrial contractor must provide : • a industrial design file (DID in French : Dossier Industriel de Définition) • a industrial manufacturing plan (DIF in French : Dossier Industriel de Fabrication) • a tests and checks industrial file (DIC in French : Dossier Industriel de Contrôle) including tests and checks in

representative conditions (interface and environment) and providing the results in order to compare with requirements







Page : 14/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03


940 Identification tracing All supplied items must be identified in a single way (type number, serial number) and the identification must be clearly visible and indelible

944 Handling, storage and transportation

Industrial contractor must provide means and procedure to avoid supplies damages during handling phases

945 Handling, storage and transportation

Industrial contractor must ensure that supplies are correctly protected against risks during transportation phase (shocks, humidity, temperature,…)

946 Checks, tests and measurement means

Any check, test and measurement mean must have : • mean identification • last calibration date with validity date • operator or organisation identification in charge of calibration

954 Non-conformances, anomalies and waivers

Non-conformances, anomalies and waivers processing is managed by DS-MP-AQ-07 (see AD12)

965 Software If specific software are designed in the frame of this contract, DS-MP-AQ-10 requirements are applicable (see chapter 6.2.2)

966 Software If standard software are used in the frame of this contract, DS-MP-AQ-10 requirements are applicable (see chapter 6.2.2) 970 Acceptance phase Before customer convocation to acceptance operations (checks, tests,…), industrial contractor must verify that the system

is correctly completed 971 Acceptance phase Before acceptance operations with the customer, industrial contractor must perform tests in order to ensure that the system

is in condition for acceptance operations. Tests results must be registered and showed to the customer 913 Factory tests and

Industrial Qualification Review

According to system or component, tests readiness review before factory tests and test review board after factory tests could be held or not. If not, MIP (Mandatory Inspection Point) will be held with the customer before shipment In case of satisfactory factory tests, an industrial qualification review (IQR) will be held. IQR report must be signed by customer and industrial contractor technical and quality assurance manager.







Page : 15/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03


974 Test readiness review

Tests procedures must be sent to the customer, for approval, at least one calendar month before test readiness review

972 Test readiness review

Industrial contractor must invite the customer to the test readiness review, by letter or fax, at least one calendar week before the foreseen date. Customer and industrial contractor technical and assurance quality representatives will participate this review.

975 Test Readiness Review

Minute of Rest Readiness Review (see format in DS-MP-AQ-06) will be written by industrial contractor for factory tests and by the customer for on-site acceptance. The minute must be signed by customer and industrial contractor technical and assurance quality representatives

977 Acceptance tests Acceptance tests must be performed in accordance with approved procedures

978 Acceptance tests Some tests may be performed with future user participation who will give his opinion on tests results

980 Acceptance tests During tests, no corrective intervention may be implemented without customer technical and quality assurance representatives agreement.

Software : see chapter 6.2.2

982 Test review board Minute of tests review board (see format in DS-MP-AQ-06) will be written by the industrial contractor for factory acceptance and by the customer for on-site acceptance. The minute must be signed by customer and industrial contractor technical and assurance quality representatives







Page : 16/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03


982 Industrial Acceptance Review

After on site tests review board, in case of satisfactory results, industrial acceptance review will be held. Minute of acceptance review board will be written by the customer. The minute must be signed by customer and industrial contractor technical and assurance quality representatives According to acceptance review board results, the customer will decide :

• acceptance without pending points or with minor pending points. A official certificate signed by customer and industrial contractor is provided for property transfer from industrial contractor to customer

• postponed acceptance. The industrial contractor must close major pending points in order to submit again the system to acceptance operations

• reject if the system is not repairable. In general, this decision is not for the whole system but for a part or a component. The substitution of this part or this component by a new one may authorise to submit again the whole system to acceptance operations

984 Pending points (Reserves)

Pending points treatment is performed in agreement between customer and industrial contractor (responsible, due date,…)


Minor pending points closure, decided by the customer, must be performed according to a document, written by the industrial contractor and approved by the customer, providing the due point subject and chosen treatment methodology


For major pending points, the customer and the industrial contractor must decide together, for each due point : • precise due point identification • corrective actions to implement in order to close the due point • mandatory checks and tests to validate these actions • closure steps schedule

987, 988, 989 Deliverable documentation

See chapter 6.3 : Documentation Requirement List

Acceptance tests includes two steps : 1st step is factory tests before delivery on site and 2nd step is tests on site







Page : 17/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

6.3. Documentation Requirement List (DRL)

The quality assurance documents to deliver by the industrial contractor are listed here after: QA report file Quality assurance management plan. SW quality assurance plan restricted to the air conditioning programmed automated system Quality assurance progress report Manufacturing inspection flow chart including MIP/KIP for factory and on site activities KIP and MIP reports Industrial qualification review report (PVRI) Actions items and pending point list Non conformance and anomaly reports Request for waiver Non conformance and anomaly list and status Waiver list and status Log book Certificate of compliance PVR Plan of external audits External audits reports Test readiness review and test review board for on site acceptance test

The schedule to provide these documents is specified in the applicable document (AD5) that defines the DRL for the industrial civil infrastructure contract.

6.4. Document Requirement Definition (DRD)

The tables of contents for each document are defined in (AD5).







Page : 18/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

7. DEPENDABILITY REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS 7.1. General requirements

Requirements tasks are described in DS-MP-SF-04 (AD20)

7.2. Tailored Requirements Tasks These requirements coming from VG-SM-212-C-002-CNES (AD)







Page : 19/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

Requirement number

Requirement area Requirement text

702 RAMS RAMS industrial Plan to be provided

704 Functional analysis Functional analysis must be provided by industrial contractor

706 Preliminary Hazard Analysis

PHA must be provided by industrial contractor

708 RAMS apportionment

If necessary the industrial contractor will provide a RAMS apportionment for subsystem included in subcontract

710 FMEA/FMECA FMEA/FMECA will be provided by industrial contractor and reduction risk actions will be opened.

712 Feared events The industrial contractor will perform an analyse of the feared events which have been specified in a list. The fault tree method is advised. This approach have to take account the hardware, software and operational failures and to assess the probability of the feared events.

714 Reliability analysis The industrial contractor will provide a reliability model by reliability diagram or another appropriate method.

716 Reliability data The industrial contractor will provide and justify the origin (databank, industrial data,…) of the reliability data (MTBF; MTTR,..) for every component.

718 Reliability assessment

The industrial contractor will perform a reliability assessment of the system for the duration of its mission. The comparison with the requirements will be done. The search of weak components will be performed and the relevant actions will be opened.

718 Availability analysis The industrial contractor will perform system intrinsic and operational availability analysis to assess the system MDT.

720 Maintainability analysis The industrial contractor will perform maintainability analysis to assess MTTR at component and MDT at system level.







Page : 20/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

Requirement number

Requirement area Requirement text

724 Spare parts list The industrial contractor will provide a spare parts list coming from the maintainability analysis and take into account the Turn Around Time relevant of the spare parts on site.

726 Safety analysis The industrial contractor will perform safety analysis to identify and assess risks against personal and facilities. The comparison with the requirements will be done.

728 Single point failure The industrial contractor will identify the SPF and take into account in RAMS analysis.

730 Common mode failure The industrial contractor will identify the common mode failures and take into account in RAMS analysis.

732 Zone analysis The industrial contractor will perform and provide a zone analysis report to the customer

734 RAMS actions The RAMS actions coming from RAMS analysis must be listed and managed by industrial contractor.

736 Critical Item List The industrial contractor will provide the CIL coming from RAMS analysis

738 RAMS report The industrial contractor will provide a RAMS reports to the customer for progress meetings and project reviews (IPDR,…,IAR)







Page : 21/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

7.3. Reminder of specified requirements 7.3.1. Reminder of severity classes

The severity classes for the technical and operational hazards of the VEGA ground segment are described as follows:

Severity class

Index Definition of the feared potential event

Catastrophic G0A Feared events concerning the CSG personnel Feared events concerning the ground facilities outside the ZLV G0B Feared events concerning the ground facilities of the ZLV Feared events concerning the launcher

Critical

G1 Feared events concerning the Payload

G2.3 Delayed launch > 1 day

G2.2 Delayed launch = 1 day

Major

G2.1 Timetable stopped without delayed launch (launch within the window after H0)

7.3.2. Reminder of qualitative objectives

The dependability qualitative requirements or objectives that were specified for the VEGA ground system design are as follows:

Severity class Design criterion Description of the criterion

Catastrophic FS / FS

No combination of hardware or software failures or of an operating error must entail feared potential events with major catastrophic consequences. In other words, the system must remain safe after a double failure of the VEGA Ground Segment or of the operators

Critical FS

No hardware or software failure, or operating error must entail feared potential events with critical consequences. In other words, the system must remain safe after a failure of the VEGA Ground Segment

Major FO

No single hardware or software failure must entail a feared potential event with a significant consequence In other words, the system must remain operational during certain fully identified operations







Page : 22/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

7.4. Qualitative and quantitative Requirements 7.4.1. Air-conditioning sub-system

7.4.1.1. Qualitative requirements a) Safety

G0A risk Application of FS/FS criterion

G0B risk Application of FS criterion

G1 risk Application of FS criterion

b) Availability The MTTR shall be less than 2h for 90% of failures

7.4.1.2. Quantitative requirements a) Safety

G0A risk: The probability of feared events concerning the personnel shall be less than 2.6 10-7 per campaign with the following distribution:

Gantry + door + mobile platform Travelling crane Mast + pallet +

swinging Lift I/F dolly

1,4E-7 5,8E-8 5,1E-8 French standards qualitative G0B risk: Application of FS criterion The probability of feared events concerning ground systems shall be less than 2.6 10-6 per campaign with the following distribution: Gantry+door+mob

PF Travelling crane Mast + pallet + swing. Lift I/F dolly

1,4E-6 6,1E-7 5,3E-7 French standards qualitative G1 risk: Application of FS criterion The probability of feared events concerning the launcher or the payload shall be less than 3.7 10-5 per campaign with the following distribution: Gantry+door+mob

PF Travelling crane Mast + pallet + lanyard Lift I/F long-load dolly

2,1E-5 8,6E-6 7,6E-6 French standards qualitative







Page : 23/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

b) Availability

G2.3 risk The probability of a timetable stop entailing postponement of firing after J1 shall be 4.5 10-4 per campaign with the following distribution: Gantry+door+mob

PF Travelling crane Mast + pallet + swing. Lift I/F dolly


G2.2 risk The probability of a timetable stop entailing postponement of firing to J1 shall be 2.0 10-3 per campaign with the following distribution: Gantry+door+mob

PF Travelling crane Mast + pallet + swing. Lift I/ Fd dolly


G2.1 risk The probability of a timetable stop entailing postponement of firing after H0 in J0 shall be 4.5 10-3 per campaign with the following distribution:

Gantry+ door+ Mob PF Travelling crane Mast + pallet +

swing. Lift I/F dolly








Page : 24/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

c) Mechanical sub-system Risk Acceptability diagram

1) Gantry + door + mobile platform

Risks Major Critical Catast.

Prob./ camp.

G2.1 G2.2 G2.3 G1 G0B G0A

1

10-2 2,5 10-3 1,1 10-3

10-3

2,5 10-4 10-4

10-5 2,1 10-5

10-6

1,4 10-6

10-7

1,4 10-7

2) Travelling crane

Risks Major Critical Catast

Prob./ camp.

G2.1 G2.2 G2.3 G1 G0B G0A

1

10-2 1,1 10-3

10-3 4,7 10-4

10-4

1,1 10-4

10-5

7,6 10-6 10-6

6,1 10-7

10-7

5,8 10-8

3) Mast + pallet + swinging

Risks Major Critical Catast

Prob./ camp.

G2.1 G2.2 G2.3 G1 G0B G0A

1

10-2

10-3 9,1 10-4

4,1 10-4 10-4

9,3 10-5

10-5

7,6 10-6 10-6

5,3 10-7

10-7

5,1 10-8







Page : 25/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

7.5. Documentation Requirement List (DRL)

The RAMS documents to deliver by the industrial contractor are listed here after:

Industrial RAMS dossier RAMS plan Rams report file Rams progress report Preliminary risk analysis RAMS apportionment objectives to sub systems FMECA Feared events list and CIL RAMS actions items list Reliability analysis and assessment Availability analysis Maintainability analysis Safety analysis Commun mode failure Single point failure Zone analysis

The schedule to deliver these documents is specified in the applicable document(AD5) which defines the DRL for the industrial civil infrastructure contract.

7.6. Documentation Requirement Document (DRD)

The tables of contents for each document are defined in § 7.6 (DRD).







Page : 26/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

8. SAFETY REGULATIONS

8.1. Requirements and tasks Industrial contractor must apply requirements 930, 931 and 932 of chapter 6.2.1

# 930 : The industrial contractor must apply on site rules # 931 : Components and installations must be consistent with mandatory directives, norms

and rules applicable on French territory # 932 : The industrial contractor will provide a certificate delivered by an officially agreed

organisation On request of the customer, industrial contractor must provide any information or data necessary to perform safety studies.

8.2. Document Requirement List The quality assurance documents to deliver by the industrial contractor are listed here after:

Report from external inspection authorities Industrial accident declaration

8.3. Document Requirement Description The tables of contents for each document are defined in (AD5).







Page : 27/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

APPENDIX







Page : 28/36 Ed.: 2 Rév.: 1 Date :11/04/03

APPENDIX A1 – CRITICAL ITEM FORM

APPENDIX A2 –ECR (CHANGE REQUEST) FORM

APPENDIX A3 –REQUEST FOR WAIVER FORM

APPENDIX A4- NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT FORM

APPENDIX A5 - CRITICAL ITEMS LIST FORM


DLA / SDS / AP DEPENDABILITY CRITICAL

POINT SHEET1 PROJECT: VEGA Ground Segment

1. CRITICAL POINT IDENTIFICATION Function: Equipment: Phase:

SHEET NO.

DATE:

ISSUE:

MANAGER:

STUDY REF.:

2. CRITICAL POINT DESCRIPTION (including possible causes) 3. TYPE OF CRITICALITY (linked to)

Probability Severity PDU Detectability Others 4. EFFECT ON THE PRODUCT OR THE SYSTEM (including the severity level)

G.0.A G.0.B G.1 G.2 5. ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE RISK OR SOLUTIONS FOUND 5.1 DATE OF OPENING: 5.3 DATE OF CLOSING:

5.2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIONS

5.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF ACTIONS CARRIED OUT

Open Confirmed Closed Mitigated

6. COMMENTS ON PROCESSING: 7. NAME AND SIGNATURE OF MANAGERS 7.1 CNES 7.2 ESA / IPT Dependability Manager: AP Manager: Dependability Manager: AP Manager:

Technical Manager: Project Manager: Project Manager:

1 This sheet will be included in the CIL logbook


PROJECT LOGO

CHANGE PROPOSAL

REQUEST

Sheet 1

Request No. :

R Date of request:

PROJECT :

Origin: CLASS:

BUDGET IMPACT ORIGINATOR ORIGINATOR MANAGER Budget size: € Return on investment criteria:

QLTY SAFE RENT Other

Name: Department : Date : Signature :

Name: Department: Date : Signature :

TITLE:

IAE/SSP: IAE title:

DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: Encl:

JUSTIFICATION OF REQUEST : Encl:

APPLICABLITY: IDENTIFIED IMPACTS

IMP No. PT code Description of the product Engineering Manager

Issuee

CHANGE BOARD COMMENTS

Name: Date: Decision Step 0 :


PROJECT: CHANGE PROPOSAL

INSTRUCTION

Sheet 2 page 1

Request No.: Filiation Instruction No.

R - - CLASS:

Instruction Authority Originator Manager Name:

Department : Date : Signature:

Name: Department : Date : Signature:

TITLE:

IAE/SSP: IAE title:

Product Ref::

DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUCTION : Encl:

JUSTIFICATION OF INSTRUCTION : Encl:

Contractual influences : Costs: delay :

APPLICABILITY:

AFFECTED DOCUMENTS

Reference Iss./Rev Description of the Product Updating manager

Impact on the Product

Safety Functional Reliability Performance Availability Interfaces Life limit Qualification Interchangeability Implementation


PROJECT: CHANGE PROPOSAL INSTRUCTION

Sheet 2 page 2

Request No.: Filiation Instruction No.

R - - CLASS:

TITRE :

Financing : Budget code 1: Budget code 2: Contract No.: Payment: Service order Cash with order Modification to order

Manager estimated cost :

Performance time limit from order::

ESTIMATE AND WORK PERFORMANCE ORDER

Estimate ref. Date Originator Amount Currency

Decision W.P.O. Reference

Date of W.P.O.


Name of board: Date : Decision Step 1 :

(if detailed comments, see sheet page 4)

WORK FOLLOW-UP:

PV reference Date Description of compliance PV Engineering Manager report

VALIDATION:

Validation report reference

Date Description of validation report Engineering Manager decision

CLOSING OF CHANGE FILE


Name of board: Date : Decision Step 2 :

(if detailed comments, see sheet page 4)


VEGA Programme Company REQUEST FOR WAIVER Waiver noVEGA-GS project RFQ

design charc. Functionalcategory

Critical CF0Major CF1Minor CF2

CF3Company Contractual

levelClass Date

Name RequesterLevel 2, level3

MajMin

Sub-Contractorlevel 1

MAI MinMAS

PrimeIndustrial contractor

MAI MinMAS

Authority : Prime Industrial Contractor Name :

Quality opinion

Opinion Name Date Signature

Project Decision

Issue date

Contractor nameRequesting Dpt.

Tech. Organigram no.

Application

Atached doc.no.

SimpleMultipleNot ident. Batch

Brief description of defectQuantity involved

NCR no.

Refer MRB

Life time/potential Other

Consequences

Description of defect

Immediate corrective action :

Identified cause :

Preventive action :

Justification synthesis, residual risks and consequences(reference documents) :

RAMS Restriciton for use

Coupling Specific operaitons

Reference :

Designation :

Functional performances

Serial or batch no.

Common VEGA/ArianeAriane Dev. Reference

Precedences

12


Product involved at this level :Requester

Level 3

Consequences on product : Level 2

Prime contractor

Consequences on upper level product :

CNES/DLA/SDS

Advice on proposed actions and justification files :

Class MAJ MIN Class MAJ MIN Class MAJ MIN Class MAJ MIN Class MAJ MINAcceptable Yes No Acceptable Yes No Acceptable Yes No Acceptable Yes No Acceptable Yes No

Name, date, signature Name, date, signature Name, date, signature Name, date, signature Name, date, signature

ProjectCNES/DLA/SDS ESA/IPT

VEGA ProgrammeVEGA-GS Project

Contractor level

Quality Assurance Technical assessmentRAMS Quality assurance

Waiver request investigation form

Company Requester Waiver no.Issue date

22


ANOMALY REPORT (FA) NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR)

PROJECT : VEGA GROUND SEGMENT

FA/NCR N° : | | | | / |__|__|__|__|

LOCATION : Contract identification : ……………………………………

FACILITY (EAI) : Issue date MANUFACTURING EXPLOITATION SYSTEM (SSP) : / / INTEGRATED TESTS CAMPAIGN Writer

COMPONENT : Name : SOFTWARE DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION N° .O.T.P. : Company : HARDWARE

CONSTAT : Procedure identif. |__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__| Operation identif. |__|__|__|__|__|__|__|

Tittle : ............................................................................................................................................................................. ANOMALY OR NON-CONFORMANCE DESCRIPTION, CIRCUMSTANCES : ANALYSIS : CAUSES, POTENTIAL RISKS :

CLASSIFICATION FA/NCR

major minor secondary

LEVEL 1 ACTION ITEM : Technical manager suggestion : FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY

CF0 CF1 CF2 CF3

Quality Manager Technical Manager Project Manager Tests Manager

NAME : NAME : NAME : NAME : OPINION AND SIGNATURE

OPINION AND SIGNATURE

OPINION AND SIGNATURE

DECISION AND SIGNATURE :

LEVEL 1 ACTION ITEM CLOSURE : INTERVENTION DESCRIPTION : Spare part serial number _____________________If change give Ref : ___________________

Date : ............................... Ref. Oper. : ......................... AP Manager : ..................... Visa AP :

MRB REMARKS : CTTA N° Level 2 Action item RFW N° : YES NO Complementary distribution :

Original :.Quality manager Copies : VEGA Project Manager Contractor


Sheet n° Critical item Status2 Closure date

2 O: Open C: Confirmed, F: Closed, A: Mitigated