13
Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1 , Jonathan Blaes 2 , Gary Lackmann 1 , and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina State University 2 NOAA/National Weather Service Raleigh, North Carolina, USA Acknowledgments : NSF grant ATM-0758509, too many collaborators to list at NC State and the Raleigh WFO

Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak

Matthew Parker1, Jonathan Blaes2, Gary Lackmann1, and Sandra Yuter1

1North Carolina State University2NOAA/National Weather Service

Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Acknowledgments: NSF grant ATM-0758509, too many collaborators to list at NC State and the Raleigh WFO

Page 2: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

• Majority of tornadoes (by number) occurred east of the Raleigh CWA, however the longest track tornadoes (and a majority of the significant tornadoes) occurred in central NC

Record for summed path length in NC (196 miles in RAH CWA alone) Tornadoes A & B had paths > 55 miles: 2 of only 4 since 1980 in NC

• Two central NC tornadoes tracked through major urban areas (A & B) Tornado A passed within 1.7 miles of the RAH NWS office (NWS-

Blacksburg backed up RAH for 7 minutes as staff took shelter) Est. damage in RAH CWA >$328M (tor. A≈$172M, tor. B≈$116M)

AB

Raleigh (metro pop 1.1M)Fayetteville (metro pop 366K)

Raleigh CWA

Page 3: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina
Page 4: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Surface observations, manual surface analysis, and radar reflectivity1200-2000 UTC, 4/16/2011

Page 5: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

R

F

Convective ingredients1200-2000 UTC, 4/16/2011

R=RaleighF=Fayetteville

Page 6: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Observed sounding:Greensboro, NC (GSO)1500 UTC 4/16/11

(modified with observed cell motion)

RUC Analysis sounding:Raleigh, NC (RDU)1800 UTC 4/16/11

(modified with observed sfc T, sfc Td, cell motion)

CAPE: 668 J/kgCIN: -10 J/kg0-6 km shear: 28 m/s0-3 km SRH: 807 m2/s2

LCL height: 264 m AGL

CAPE: 1043 J/kgCIN: 0 J/kg0-6 km shear: 30 m/s0-3 km SRH: 804 m2/s2

LCL height: 763 m AGL

Page 7: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

• The initial convective mode appeared to be linear, but the squall line evolved into discrete supercells over central and southern NC

• A number of cells appeared to have been initiated ahead of the primary squall line, but all of these pre-line cells dissipated

Base scan radar reflectivity and eventual primary tornado tracks1630-1900 UTC, 4/16/2011

“Raleigh”

“Fayetteville”

• The “Raleigh” and “Fayetteville” supercells can actually be tracked backward to origins in SC around 1600-1700 UTC

Page 8: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Raleigh

Fayetteville

Surface observations, radar reflectivity, and eventual primary tornado tracks1800 UTC, 4/16/2011

1. Outflow temperature deficits were generally small (~5-6 C)- high ABL rel. humidity- no trailing strat. precip.

2. Low-level shear vectors were largely parallel to the squall line

3. Strongly curved clockwise hodographs favor dynamic lifting on the right flanks of supercells

Page 9: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Idealized simulation with initial linear trigger

Homogeneous environment:1800 UTC RUC analysisSounding from RDU

• Simulated cold pool temperature deficit never exceeds 6 K

• Simulated squall line breaks up despite homogeneous environment

• Simulated supercells emerge after roughly 3 hours

Evolution appears to have been strongly controlled by

the environment

Simulated reflectivity

Page 10: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

• The three supercells highlighted above produced 10 total tornadoes (pink tracks), including two significant (EF2 or greater) tornadoes each

• The Raleigh supercell appeared to be quasi-steady during its lifetime, whereas the Fayetteville supercell appeared to be somewhat cyclic, with periods of multiple circulation centers

Base scan radar reflectivity and tornado tracks (RAH CWA only)1900-2030 UTC, 4/16/2011

Page 11: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

parent mesotornado

Sanford, NC1908 UTC (308 PM EDT), 4/16/2011 (early in lifetime)

Raleigh, NC1950 UTC (350 PM EDT) 04/16/2011

(late in lifetime)

parent meso

tornado

“Raleigh tornado”

Page 12: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Smithfield, NC2049 UTC (449 PM EDT), 4/16/2011

(end of tornado 1, beginning of tornado 2)

“Fayetteville supercell”

tornado 1

tornado 2

Page 13: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Preliminary conclusions

• The longest-track tornadoes on 4/16/2011 were centered in the Raleigh CWA. Wind profiles were impressive , with slight enhancement during the day. Non-zero CAPE wasn’t present until 2-3 hours prior to the tornadoes.

• The observed squall line-to-supercell evolution is somewhat unusual. Squall line moved off of the cold front, and the outflow behind the squall line

was not especially cold; the linear forcing is hypothesized to have been weak. Large vertical wind shear, strongly curved hodographs, and minimal low-level

line-normal shear appear to strongly favor discrete supercells.

• The 4/16/2011 outbreak was a record-setter for central NC. We have ongoing interest in trying to understand what was unique about the environment.

Anecdotally: long, strongly-curved low-level hodographs are somewhat unusual within the warm sector in central NC.

Anecdotally: low-level flow from off of the Atlantic tends to yield greater low-level stability. Such stability may permit larger low-level vertical wind shear to persist in the afternoon boundary layer, but the interplay between this process and the development of CAPE seems complex.

This slide to do:Add visual interest

questions/comments: [email protected]