Transcript
Page 1: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak

Matthew Parker1, Jonathan Blaes2, Gary Lackmann1, and Sandra Yuter1

1North Carolina State University2NOAA/National Weather Service

Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Acknowledgments: NSF grant ATM-0758509, too many collaborators to list at NC State and the Raleigh WFO

Page 2: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

• Majority of tornadoes (by number) occurred east of the Raleigh CWA, however the longest track tornadoes (and a majority of the significant tornadoes) occurred in central NC

Record for summed path length in NC (196 miles in RAH CWA alone) Tornadoes A & B had paths > 55 miles: 2 of only 4 since 1980 in NC

• Two central NC tornadoes tracked through major urban areas (A & B) Tornado A passed within 1.7 miles of the RAH NWS office (NWS-

Blacksburg backed up RAH for 7 minutes as staff took shelter) Est. damage in RAH CWA >$328M (tor. A≈$172M, tor. B≈$116M)

AB

Raleigh (metro pop 1.1M)Fayetteville (metro pop 366K)

Raleigh CWA

Page 3: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina
Page 4: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Surface observations, manual surface analysis, and radar reflectivity1200-2000 UTC, 4/16/2011

Page 5: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

R

F

Convective ingredients1200-2000 UTC, 4/16/2011

R=RaleighF=Fayetteville

Page 6: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Observed sounding:Greensboro, NC (GSO)1500 UTC 4/16/11

(modified with observed cell motion)

RUC Analysis sounding:Raleigh, NC (RDU)1800 UTC 4/16/11

(modified with observed sfc T, sfc Td, cell motion)

CAPE: 668 J/kgCIN: -10 J/kg0-6 km shear: 28 m/s0-3 km SRH: 807 m2/s2

LCL height: 264 m AGL

CAPE: 1043 J/kgCIN: 0 J/kg0-6 km shear: 30 m/s0-3 km SRH: 804 m2/s2

LCL height: 763 m AGL

Page 7: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

• The initial convective mode appeared to be linear, but the squall line evolved into discrete supercells over central and southern NC

• A number of cells appeared to have been initiated ahead of the primary squall line, but all of these pre-line cells dissipated

Base scan radar reflectivity and eventual primary tornado tracks1630-1900 UTC, 4/16/2011

“Raleigh”

“Fayetteville”

• The “Raleigh” and “Fayetteville” supercells can actually be tracked backward to origins in SC around 1600-1700 UTC

Page 8: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Raleigh

Fayetteville

Surface observations, radar reflectivity, and eventual primary tornado tracks1800 UTC, 4/16/2011

1. Outflow temperature deficits were generally small (~5-6 C)- high ABL rel. humidity- no trailing strat. precip.

2. Low-level shear vectors were largely parallel to the squall line

3. Strongly curved clockwise hodographs favor dynamic lifting on the right flanks of supercells

Page 9: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Idealized simulation with initial linear trigger

Homogeneous environment:1800 UTC RUC analysisSounding from RDU

• Simulated cold pool temperature deficit never exceeds 6 K

• Simulated squall line breaks up despite homogeneous environment

• Simulated supercells emerge after roughly 3 hours

Evolution appears to have been strongly controlled by

the environment

Simulated reflectivity

Page 10: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

• The three supercells highlighted above produced 10 total tornadoes (pink tracks), including two significant (EF2 or greater) tornadoes each

• The Raleigh supercell appeared to be quasi-steady during its lifetime, whereas the Fayetteville supercell appeared to be somewhat cyclic, with periods of multiple circulation centers

Base scan radar reflectivity and tornado tracks (RAH CWA only)1900-2030 UTC, 4/16/2011

Page 11: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

parent mesotornado

Sanford, NC1908 UTC (308 PM EDT), 4/16/2011 (early in lifetime)

Raleigh, NC1950 UTC (350 PM EDT) 04/16/2011

(late in lifetime)

parent meso

tornado

“Raleigh tornado”

Page 12: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Smithfield, NC2049 UTC (449 PM EDT), 4/16/2011

(end of tornado 1, beginning of tornado 2)

“Fayetteville supercell”

tornado 1

tornado 2

Page 13: Central North Carolina Tornadoes from the 16 April 2011 Outbreak Matthew Parker 1, Jonathan Blaes 2, Gary Lackmann 1, and Sandra Yuter 1 1 North Carolina

Preliminary conclusions

• The longest-track tornadoes on 4/16/2011 were centered in the Raleigh CWA. Wind profiles were impressive , with slight enhancement during the day. Non-zero CAPE wasn’t present until 2-3 hours prior to the tornadoes.

• The observed squall line-to-supercell evolution is somewhat unusual. Squall line moved off of the cold front, and the outflow behind the squall line

was not especially cold; the linear forcing is hypothesized to have been weak. Large vertical wind shear, strongly curved hodographs, and minimal low-level

line-normal shear appear to strongly favor discrete supercells.

• The 4/16/2011 outbreak was a record-setter for central NC. We have ongoing interest in trying to understand what was unique about the environment.

Anecdotally: long, strongly-curved low-level hodographs are somewhat unusual within the warm sector in central NC.

Anecdotally: low-level flow from off of the Atlantic tends to yield greater low-level stability. Such stability may permit larger low-level vertical wind shear to persist in the afternoon boundary layer, but the interplay between this process and the development of CAPE seems complex.

This slide to do:Add visual interest

questions/comments: [email protected]


Recommended