Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dow CEER -Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Market Characterization
Update August 10 2011 Tim Mrozowski AIA LEEDreg AP School of Planning Design and Construction
Michigan State University Nathaniel Ehrlich PhD Office for Survey Research
Michigan State University
1
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Dow Building Solutions Michigan State University Ferris State University Habitat for Humanity International Habitat for Humanity of Kent CountyHabitat for Humanity of Michigan
Overview of Presentation
Project Overview Present Market Characterization
Methodology Findings to date
Focus Application of innovative retrofit technologies in partnership with Habitat for Humanity affiliates primarily in the cold and mixed-humid climate regions Improve retrofit methodologies by validating cost-effective strategies through test homes and identifying technology gaps that must be addressed
Core Activities Four interwoven research projects 61 Market Characterization Project 62 Market Realities and Change Management to Accelerate
Adoption of Cost Effective Energy Efficiency Retrofits 63 Information Framework for Energy Efficiency Upgrades 71 Evaluation and Testing of Individual Retrofit Measures
Other Activities-Administrative-technical committee best practicesworst practices definition project management etc
Underlying Concepts The underlying theme of the CEER team is to increase implementation
and uptake of BA research and energy retrofits in the real world Toward that end we are undertaking a group of research projects designed to help us understand markets customers stakeholders technical solutions and information delivery
Once concept is that an appropriate prescriptive packages of retrofit measures can be matched to housing archetype Vintage for example in the Midwest will likely dictate balloon or platform framing window solutions progression of HVAC equipment etc Understanding the characteristics and prevalence of archetypes will help focus the scientific research
By selecting highly common archetypes our field testing of retrofit solutions can be focused on solutions for high impact home types
6
Making a Library of Archetype examples
(source httpwwwoldhouseonlinecom)
(source httparchitectureaboutcom)
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Dow Building Solutions Michigan State University Ferris State University Habitat for Humanity International Habitat for Humanity of Kent CountyHabitat for Humanity of Michigan
Overview of Presentation
Project Overview Present Market Characterization
Methodology Findings to date
Focus Application of innovative retrofit technologies in partnership with Habitat for Humanity affiliates primarily in the cold and mixed-humid climate regions Improve retrofit methodologies by validating cost-effective strategies through test homes and identifying technology gaps that must be addressed
Core Activities Four interwoven research projects 61 Market Characterization Project 62 Market Realities and Change Management to Accelerate
Adoption of Cost Effective Energy Efficiency Retrofits 63 Information Framework for Energy Efficiency Upgrades 71 Evaluation and Testing of Individual Retrofit Measures
Other Activities-Administrative-technical committee best practicesworst practices definition project management etc
Underlying Concepts The underlying theme of the CEER team is to increase implementation
and uptake of BA research and energy retrofits in the real world Toward that end we are undertaking a group of research projects designed to help us understand markets customers stakeholders technical solutions and information delivery
Once concept is that an appropriate prescriptive packages of retrofit measures can be matched to housing archetype Vintage for example in the Midwest will likely dictate balloon or platform framing window solutions progression of HVAC equipment etc Understanding the characteristics and prevalence of archetypes will help focus the scientific research
By selecting highly common archetypes our field testing of retrofit solutions can be focused on solutions for high impact home types
6
Making a Library of Archetype examples
(source httpwwwoldhouseonlinecom)
(source httparchitectureaboutcom)
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Overview of Presentation
Project Overview Present Market Characterization
Methodology Findings to date
Focus Application of innovative retrofit technologies in partnership with Habitat for Humanity affiliates primarily in the cold and mixed-humid climate regions Improve retrofit methodologies by validating cost-effective strategies through test homes and identifying technology gaps that must be addressed
Core Activities Four interwoven research projects 61 Market Characterization Project 62 Market Realities and Change Management to Accelerate
Adoption of Cost Effective Energy Efficiency Retrofits 63 Information Framework for Energy Efficiency Upgrades 71 Evaluation and Testing of Individual Retrofit Measures
Other Activities-Administrative-technical committee best practicesworst practices definition project management etc
Underlying Concepts The underlying theme of the CEER team is to increase implementation
and uptake of BA research and energy retrofits in the real world Toward that end we are undertaking a group of research projects designed to help us understand markets customers stakeholders technical solutions and information delivery
Once concept is that an appropriate prescriptive packages of retrofit measures can be matched to housing archetype Vintage for example in the Midwest will likely dictate balloon or platform framing window solutions progression of HVAC equipment etc Understanding the characteristics and prevalence of archetypes will help focus the scientific research
By selecting highly common archetypes our field testing of retrofit solutions can be focused on solutions for high impact home types
6
Making a Library of Archetype examples
(source httpwwwoldhouseonlinecom)
(source httparchitectureaboutcom)
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Focus Application of innovative retrofit technologies in partnership with Habitat for Humanity affiliates primarily in the cold and mixed-humid climate regions Improve retrofit methodologies by validating cost-effective strategies through test homes and identifying technology gaps that must be addressed
Core Activities Four interwoven research projects 61 Market Characterization Project 62 Market Realities and Change Management to Accelerate
Adoption of Cost Effective Energy Efficiency Retrofits 63 Information Framework for Energy Efficiency Upgrades 71 Evaluation and Testing of Individual Retrofit Measures
Other Activities-Administrative-technical committee best practicesworst practices definition project management etc
Underlying Concepts The underlying theme of the CEER team is to increase implementation
and uptake of BA research and energy retrofits in the real world Toward that end we are undertaking a group of research projects designed to help us understand markets customers stakeholders technical solutions and information delivery
Once concept is that an appropriate prescriptive packages of retrofit measures can be matched to housing archetype Vintage for example in the Midwest will likely dictate balloon or platform framing window solutions progression of HVAC equipment etc Understanding the characteristics and prevalence of archetypes will help focus the scientific research
By selecting highly common archetypes our field testing of retrofit solutions can be focused on solutions for high impact home types
6
Making a Library of Archetype examples
(source httpwwwoldhouseonlinecom)
(source httparchitectureaboutcom)
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Core Activities Four interwoven research projects 61 Market Characterization Project 62 Market Realities and Change Management to Accelerate
Adoption of Cost Effective Energy Efficiency Retrofits 63 Information Framework for Energy Efficiency Upgrades 71 Evaluation and Testing of Individual Retrofit Measures
Other Activities-Administrative-technical committee best practicesworst practices definition project management etc
Underlying Concepts The underlying theme of the CEER team is to increase implementation
and uptake of BA research and energy retrofits in the real world Toward that end we are undertaking a group of research projects designed to help us understand markets customers stakeholders technical solutions and information delivery
Once concept is that an appropriate prescriptive packages of retrofit measures can be matched to housing archetype Vintage for example in the Midwest will likely dictate balloon or platform framing window solutions progression of HVAC equipment etc Understanding the characteristics and prevalence of archetypes will help focus the scientific research
By selecting highly common archetypes our field testing of retrofit solutions can be focused on solutions for high impact home types
6
Making a Library of Archetype examples
(source httpwwwoldhouseonlinecom)
(source httparchitectureaboutcom)
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Underlying Concepts The underlying theme of the CEER team is to increase implementation
and uptake of BA research and energy retrofits in the real world Toward that end we are undertaking a group of research projects designed to help us understand markets customers stakeholders technical solutions and information delivery
Once concept is that an appropriate prescriptive packages of retrofit measures can be matched to housing archetype Vintage for example in the Midwest will likely dictate balloon or platform framing window solutions progression of HVAC equipment etc Understanding the characteristics and prevalence of archetypes will help focus the scientific research
By selecting highly common archetypes our field testing of retrofit solutions can be focused on solutions for high impact home types
6
Making a Library of Archetype examples
(source httpwwwoldhouseonlinecom)
(source httparchitectureaboutcom)
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Making a Library of Archetype examples
(source httpwwwoldhouseonlinecom)
(source httparchitectureaboutcom)
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Making a Library of Archetype examples
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Home Selection Goals Best Case for 71 studies Need 3 similar homes Must meet HfH marketing criteria-for resale after project Kent County One common archetype Similar vintage ndashyears built Same neighborhood Same Block Same side of street Same climate conditions
Same renovations
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Compromises Difficult to find the ideal Will settle for subset of previous conditions and will
calibrate-normalize through testing Project team will compromise criteria some in the
home selection Will require calibration through testing
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Compromises House grouping and availability
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Home Purchase HfH Kent County will be the purchaser of the homes HfH will conduct itrsquos usual safety testing and hazard mitigation
HfH will receive the homes for resale at completion of the research
CEER team will lease the homes from HfH during the scientific testing period through contract with HfH
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Our Planshellip Market Characterization Characterize the dominant housing types in the Great Lakes
sub-area Identify major housing types that offer the greatest
opportunity for deep energy retrofit
14
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Research Benefits Focus Dow team scientific studies Profile the region Provide guidance to NREL researchers Development of methodology for collecting and analyzing
regional and local data filling a research gap Provide guidance for policy makers Methodology can be used by local industry participants Identification of Retrofit measures
15
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Research Questions What housing archetypes dominate by number and distribution in
the Great Lakes sub-region when considering vintage style and
DOW Habitat Team 61 Market Characterization
construction type
Which housing archetypes offer the greatest opportunity for deep energy retrofit implementation based on numbers of structures and housing characteristics
Which housing archetype will be most effective to address in the first year test homes task 71
Which archetypes will be effective to address in subsequent tasks
How best to collect this data
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Expected Outcomes DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
The market analysis research will
Establish criteria for selecting high impact case studies with largest potential for implementationleveraging to a larger set of homes
Submit a first year market analysis report the Great Lakes Sub-region of Cold Climate Region that is useful for policy makers in focusing energy retrofit programs and research
Develop a methodology for establishing the mix of archetypes within a region or local market
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Selected Ann Arbor (A2) Michigan as experimental test bed After evaluating approach experiment will be repeated in 5 markets
within the region
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Outline of process First get qualitative [judgmental] data from local experts Realtors
contractors Get quantitative data from local government (Ann Arbor Mayorrsquos office
was very helpful Compare to quantitative data from other sources American Housing Survey SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Zillowcom ndash national data on homes for sale or recently sold
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Market Characterization Purpose Develop a taxonomy of housing archetypes within a specified area Independent variables Build date Style Size
Dependent variables Prevalence Need for upgrade Home owner demographics
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Fields 1-30 AHS
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Final AHS fields
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Michigan Housing Market Review DOW Habitat Team
61 Market Characterization
Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Housing Stock
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (108)
80821 (179)
54982 (122)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
114951 (100)
Occupied Units
Total 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (882)
102153 (881)
125376 (865)
Owner-occupied
2879917 (746)
20603 (467)
44436 (606)
28323 (584)
176176 (669)
65525 (641)
75584 (603)
Renter-occupied
980243 (254)
23504 (533)
28875 (394)
20212 (416)
141558 (331)
36628 (359)
49792 (397)
Source US Census Bureau (2009) 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5- Year Estimates Retrieved May 15 2011 from httpfactfindercensusgov
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Year of compl etion
Total 4522600 (100)
48723 (100)
80821 (100)
54982 (100)
404496 (100)
115887 (100)
125376 (100)
Built after 2005 76092 (17)
523 (11)
592 (07)
287 (05)
2149 (05)
1247 (11)
34904 (278)
2000 to 2004 316724 (70)
2093 (43)
2377 (29)
1588 (29)
4514 (11)
5870 (51)
32781 (261)
1990 to 1999 580054 (128)
4723 (97)
4948 (61)
2149 (39)
7585 (19)
14506 (125)
25724 (205)
1980 to 1989 446425 (99)
5249 (108)
5603 (69)
4490 (82)
8741 (22)
13034 (112)
12787 (102)
1970 to 1979 711453 (157)
9409 (108)
6570 (81)
8813 (160)
14590 (36)
16768 (145)
8860 (71)
1960 to 1969 545422 (121)
9689 (199)
8506 (105)
8112 (148)
26925 (67)
19157 (165)
1969 or Earlier 10 320 (82)
1950 to 1959 703306 (156)
6799 (140)
12880 (159)
10074 (183)
88666 (219)
14897 (129)
1940 to 1949 392422 (87)
2922 (60)
8188 (101)
5731 (104)
106794 (264)
8118 (70)
1939 or earlier 750702 (166)
7316 (150)
31157 (386)
13738 (250)
144532 (357)
22290 (192)
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Michigan Housing Market Review Items State Target Cities
Michigan Total
Ann Arbor Grand Rapids
Lansing Detroit Ft Wayne (Indiana)
Toledo (Ohio)
Other Total occupied 3860160 (100)
44107 (100)
73311 (100)
48535 (100)
317734 (100)
102153 (100)
125376 (100)
Lacking complete plumbing facilities
14418 (04)
187 (04)
646 (09)
157 (03)
2375 (07)
192 (02)
321 (03)
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
21153 (05)
258 (06)
998 (14)
191 (04)
3639 (11)
413 (04)
825 (07)
No telephone service
205031 (53)
3352 (76)
5898 (80)
4924 (101)
27201 (86)
5514 (54)
6381 (51)
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
List of attributes ndash A2 housing
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Fields referenced
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
SEMCOG
SEMCOG (Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 28
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
29
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
httpwwwzillowcomhomes48104_rb 30
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Zillowcom 31
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Sourcing the data We met with two experienced Ann Arbor Michigan Realtorscopy and asked them to speculate on the mostprevalent styles and those most likely to be upgraded
Their answers 2-story homes built prior to 1930 Ranch homes built in the post-WWII boom 1950-1969
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
2-story pre-1930 ldquoOld West Side Charmersrdquo
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Postwar ranches c1960
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
How prevalent are these types
ANN ARBOR REGN 2 ALL AHS Percent Percent Percent
PRE 1930 2 STOREY 130 37 21 POSTWAR RANCH (1946‐1970 198 55 111 COUNT OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY 24025 18757100 77638853 All homes selected range from 900‐2500 sqft
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
A few caveatshellip
While itrsquos tempting to talk about a region and determine dominant archetypes location matters as does data source
The next few slides illustrate how these elements varyWersquove just used build data and all single-family homes
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Caveat ndash Census area matters Census Areas and build date
25 22
9 11 8 8 6 7
29 28 23 24
38
42
61 58
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Northeast Midwest South West
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Caveat ndash Metro area matters
Midwest compared to Ann Arbor 42
22 22
8
13
28
38
27
Midwest Ann Arbor
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Whatrsquos Selling in Michigan College Towns Comparing recently sold properties in EastLansing and Ann Arbor
55
38
31
2222 1817
9
EL SOLD AA SOLD
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Sales vs Stock
55
38
27
22 22
1817
13
AA SOLD AA STOCK
lt1931 1931-1949 1950-1969 gt1969
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
For Sale vs Stock
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock (from db)
22 24
13 13
38 42
27 27
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
(from db)
For sale and sold (sampled and combined) vs Housing stock
22
13
38
2724
13
42
27
lt1931 1931‐1949 1950‐1969 gt1969
AA STOCK AA ALL ZILLOW
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Southwest Ranches
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Old West Side
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
A2 Heat Map
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Lessons from Better Buildings for Michigan (BBFM) Barriers History and plans of homeowner Income Age
How the program is introduced
Other related Voice of Customer Work DOW CEER 62 Market Change Project WellHome White Paper
Other related Implementation Work DOW CEER 63 Information Framework Project
47
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
What we are finding What does it mean to
Dow Habitat Team NREL Research Teams Policy makers Local Retrofit Companies
48
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Next Steps and Schedule
Connecting BBFM work to DOW 62 and Wellhome White paper Selecting homes for technical testing studies Relating archetypes to identifying retrofit measures in
DOW Task 63 Field research work to be completed
49
Q and A
Q and A