67
Appendix A CB-PAST Form 2 COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS (CB-PAST) Name : ___JANE A. TESADO______ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester : To Teachers : For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values. 4 – Highly Proficient (HP) Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident. 3 – Proficient (P) Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas. 2 – Basic (B) Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job. 1 – Below Basic (BB)

CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Appendix A

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : ___JANE A. TESADO______ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

Page 2: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

DepEd BESRA TED - TWGDepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSI. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

A. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

2. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

3. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

4. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

5. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

6. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

7. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

2. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

3. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

4. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

5. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

6. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

7. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

8. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

9. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

10. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

11. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

12. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

C. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

2. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

3. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

4. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

5. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

6. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

7. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

8. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

Page 3: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

9. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

D. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

2. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

3. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 33 4

4. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

5. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 3 4

6. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 4

E. Community Linkages

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

2. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

3. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

4. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

5. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

6. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

F. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

2. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

3. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

4. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

G. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

Page 4: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. / 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

/ 2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

Page 5: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 23 3.286 P .33 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30%

12 42 3.5 P 1.05

C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20%

9 31 3.44 P .69

Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.07 II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 22 3.67 HP .37 E. Community linkages 10% 6 19 3.17 P .32Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.69III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 15 3.75 HP .38 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development

10% 10 37 3.7 HP .37

Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.75Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) 3.51Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal Highly

ProficientPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average) .08Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned)

3.59

Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal O

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

Page 6: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get thelower performance rating.

Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of the standards

Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Satisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Unsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic in any of the standards

Remarks:

Agreements:

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Ratee: JANE A. TESADO ______ Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Page 7: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Appendix A

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : MIGUELITA C. PIS-AN Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT

School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing

Page 8: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWGDepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSI. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

A. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

2. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

3. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

4. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

5. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

6. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

7. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

2. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

3. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

4. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

5. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

6. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

7. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

8. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

9. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

10. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

11. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

12. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

C. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

Page 9: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

1. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

2. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

3. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

4. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

5. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

6. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

7. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

8. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

9. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

D. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

2. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

3. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 3 4

4. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

5. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 3 4

6. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 4

E. Community Linkages

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

2. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

3. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

4. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

5. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

6. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

F. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

2. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

3. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

4. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

G. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

Page 10: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. / 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

/ 3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

Page 11: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

/ 1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

/ 2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 24 3.43 P 0.343 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30% 12 41 3.42 P 1.026 C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20% 9 33 3.67 HP 0.734Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.023 II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 21 3.5 P 0.35 E. Community linkages 10% 6 15 2.5 P 0.25Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.73III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 13 3.25 P 0.325 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development 10% 10 34 3.4 P 0.34Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.665Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) 3.368

Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal PROFICIENTPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average) 0.16Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned) 3.528Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal O

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

Page 12: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get thelower performance rating.

Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of the standards

Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Satisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Unsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic in any of the standards

Remarks:

Agreements:

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Ratee: MIGUELITA C. PIS - AN Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Page 13: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Appendix A

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : FELSIE Q. SEVERINO _____ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Page 14: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWGDepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSII. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

H. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

8. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

9. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

10. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

11. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

12. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

13. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

14. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

I. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

13. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

14. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

15. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

16. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

17. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

18. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

19. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

20. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

21. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

Page 15: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

22. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

23. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

24. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

J. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

10. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

11. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

12. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

13. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

14. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

15. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

16. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

17. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

18. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

K. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

7. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

8. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

9. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 3 4

10. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

11. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 3 4

12. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 44

L. Community Linkages

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

7. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

8. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

9. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

10. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

11. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

12. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

M. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

5. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

Page 16: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

6. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

7. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

8. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

N. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

/ 4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. / 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

Page 17: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

/ 2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 23 3.285 P 0.329 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30% 12 43 3.583 P 1.075 C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20% 9 32 3.555 HP 0.711Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.115 II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 20 3.333 P 0.333 E. Community linkages 10% 6 24 4 HP .4Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.733III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 14 3.5 P 0.35 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development 10% 10 34 3.4 P 0.34Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.69Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) 3.538Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal HIGHLY

PROFICIENTPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average) 0.12Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned) 3.658Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal O

Page 18: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get thelower performance rating.

Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of the standards

Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Satisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Unsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic in any of the standards

Remarks:

Agreements:

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Page 19: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Ratee: FELSIE Q. SEVERINO __ Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Appendix A

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : LENETTE T. UY _________ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

Page 20: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWGDepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSIII. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

O. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

15. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

16. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

17. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

18. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

19. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

20. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

21. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

P. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

25. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

26. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

27. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

Page 21: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

28. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

29. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

30. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

31. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

32. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

33. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

34. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

35. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

36. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

Q. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

19. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

20. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

21. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

22. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

23. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

24. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

25. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

26. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

27. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

R. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

13. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

14. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

15. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 33 4

16. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

17. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 33 4

18. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 44

S. Community Linkages

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

13. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

14. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

15. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

16. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

17. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

18. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

Page 22: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

T. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

9. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

10. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

11. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

12. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

U. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

Page 23: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30%

12

C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20%

9

Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.02 II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 E. Community linkages 10% 6Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.73III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development

10% 10

Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.66Formative Performance Rating

Page 24: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

(Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal PROFICIENTPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average)Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned)Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal VS

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get thelower performance rating.

Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of the standards

Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Satisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Unsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic in any of the standards

Remarks:

Agreements:

Page 25: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Ratee: ______________

Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Appendix A

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : _____________________ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

Page 26: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWGDepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSIV. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

V. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

22. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

23. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

24. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

25. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

26. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

Page 27: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

27. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

28. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

W. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

37. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

38. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

39. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

40. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

41. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

42. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

43. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

44. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

45. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

46. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

47. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

48. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

X. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

28. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

29. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

30. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

31. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

32. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

33. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

34. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

35. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

36. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

Y. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

19. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

20. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

21. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 33 4

22. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

23. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 33 4

24. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 44

Z. Community Linkages

Page 28: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

19. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

20. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

21. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

22. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

23. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

24. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

AA. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

13. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

14. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

15. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

16. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

BB.Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Page 29: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30%

12

C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20%

9

Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.02

Page 30: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 E. Community linkages 10% 6Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.73III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development

10% 10

Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.66Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal PROFICIENTPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average)Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned)Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal VS

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get thelower performance rating.

Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of the standards

Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Satisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Unsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic in any of the standards

Page 31: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Remarks:

Agreements:

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Ratee: ______________

Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Appendix A

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : _____________________ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center

Page 32: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWGDepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSV. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

CC. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

Page 33: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

29. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

30. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

31. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

32. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

33. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

34. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

35. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

DD.Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

49. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

50. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

51. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

52. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

53. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

54. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

55. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

56. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

57. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

58. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

59. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

60. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

EE. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

37. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

38. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

39. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

40. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

41. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

42. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

43. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

44. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

45. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

FF. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

25. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

Page 34: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

26. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

27. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 33 4

28. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

29. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 33 4

30. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 44

GG. Community Linkages

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

25. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

26. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

27. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

28. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

29. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

30. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

HH. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

17. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

18. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

19. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

20. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

II. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Page 35: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Page 36: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30%

12

C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20%

9

Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.02 II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 E. Community linkages 10% 6Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.73III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development

10% 10

Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.66Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal PROFICIENTPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average)Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned)Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal VS

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get the

Page 37: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

lower performance rating.Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of

the standardsVery Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any

of the standardsSatisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of

the standardsUnsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic

in any of the standards

Remarks:

Agreements:

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Ratee: ______________

Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Appendix A

Page 38: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : _____________________ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Page 39: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSVI. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

JJ. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

36. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

37. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

38. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

39. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

40. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

41. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

42. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

KK. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

61. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

62. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

63. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

64. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

65. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

66. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

67. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

68. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

69. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

70. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

71. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

72. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

LL. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

46. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

47. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

48. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

49. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

50. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

51. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

52. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

53. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

54. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

Page 40: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

MM. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

31. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

32. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

33. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 33 4

34. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

35. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 33 4

36. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 44

NN. Community Linkages

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

31. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

32. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

33. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

34. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

35. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

36. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

OO. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

21. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

22. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

23. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

24. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

PP. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

Page 41: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

Page 42: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30%

12

C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20%

9

Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.02 II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 E. Community linkages 10% 6Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.73III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development

10% 10

Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.66Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal PROFICIENTPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average)Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned)Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal VS

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Page 43: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get thelower performance rating.

Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of the standards

Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Satisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Unsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic in any of the standards

Remarks:

Agreements:

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Ratee: ______________

Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

Page 44: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Appendix A

CB-PAST Form 2

COMPETENCY- BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS(CB-PAST)

Name : _____________________ Position Title : T - III Appointee Status : PERMANENT School : West City Exceptional Child Learning Center District : West Division : Dumaguete City Region : VII School Year : 2012-2013 First Semester : ________ Second Semester :

To Teachers :

For Part I, use a rating scale with 1 as lowest and 4 as the highest. Rate yourself along the indicators under each performance standard. Circle the appropriate rating that applies to you in every item. For clearer understanding, refer to the expanded rubrics for the holistic description/interpretation of the rating values.

4 – Highly Proficient (HP)

Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident.

3 – Proficient (P)

Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

2 – Basic (B)

Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1 – Below Basic (BB)

Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

Part II, the PLUS FACTOR shall be used for the Summative Appraisal at the end of the school year. It is a list of performance beyond the call of duty which are not included in the

Page 45: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

indicators of Part I. Every Plus Factor item has a value of .04 and a teacher may earn a maximum of 0.4 point during the summative appraisal period. Check the item being claimed. Duly certified evidences of the plus factor claimed should be found in your Teacher’s Portfolio.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWGDepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART I- COMPONENTS AND STANDARDSVII. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Rating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

QQ. Diversity of Learners

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

43. set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 1 2 3

4

44. utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners

1 2 3 4

45. paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 1 2 3

4

46. provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks 1 2 3 4

47. recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities

1 2 3 4

48. adopted strategies to address needs of differently- abled learners 1 2 3 4

49. showed fairness and consideration to all learners regardless of socio-economic backgrounds

1 2 3 4

RR. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

73. delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches and strategies

1 2 3 4

74. used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and values in teaching 1 2 3 4

75. explained learning goal, instructional procedures and content clearly and accurately to students

1 2 3 4

76. linked the current content with past and future lessons 1 2 3 4

77. aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners.

1 2 3 4

78. created situations that encourage learners to use high order thinking skills through the use of local language among others if needed

1 2 3 4

79. engaged and sustained learners’ interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.

1 2 3 4

80. integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 1 2 3 4

81. established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time 1 2 3 4

82. selected, prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives

1 2 3 4

83. provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.

1 2 3 4

84. used available ICT resources for planning and designing teaching- learning activities

1 2 3 4

SS. Planning, Assessing and Reporting

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

55. constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests 1 2 3 4

56. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques(portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc. )

1 2 3 4

57. interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

Page 46: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

58. identified teaching- learning difficulties and possible causes 1 2 3 4

59. managed learning remediation activities 1 2 3 4

60. used tools for assessing authentic learning 1 2 3 4

61. provided timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth

1 2 33 4

62. kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 1 2 3 4

63. conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners’ progress

1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGESRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

TT. Learning Environment

Within the appraisal period, I . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

37. provides equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 1 2 3 4

38. maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions 1 2 3 4

39. used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capacities of learners for higher learning

1 2 33 4

40. inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 1 2 3 4

41. handled behavior patterns quickly and with due respect to children’s rights 1 2 33 4

42. created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher

1 2 3 44

UU. Community Linkages

Within the appraisal period, I …. Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

37. involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners’ achievement

1 2 3 4

38. used varied and available community resources ( human, materials) to support learning

1 2 3 4

39. used community as a laboratory for teaching and learning 1 2 3 4

40. got involved in/sharing information on school events andachievement 1 2 3 4

41. led students to apply classroom learning to the community 1 2 3 4

42. informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures.

1 2 3 4

III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICSRating Legend: BB- Below Basic; B – Basic; P – Proficient; HP – Highly Proficient

VV. Social Regard for Learning

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

25. abide by and implemented school policies and procedures 1 2 3 4

26. demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions.

1 2 3 4

27. maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times 1 2 3 4

28. demonstrated appropriate behavior in dealing with learners, peers, and superiors

1 2 3 4

WW. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development

Within the appraisal period, I . . . . Appraisal RatingBB B P HP

1. maintained stature and behavior that upheld the dignity of teaching 1 2 3 4

2. manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude, collegiality among others

1 2 3 4

3. demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in the classroom 1 2 3 4

4. updated myself with recent developments in education 1 2 3 4

Page 47: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

5. participated actively in professional organizations 1 2 3 44

6. reflected on the quality of my own teaching 1 2 3 4

7. improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, learners, peers, superiors and others.

1 2 3 4

8. used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weakness 1 2 3 4

9. accepted accountability for learners’ outcomes 1 2 3 4

10. abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teaching 1 2 3 4

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

PART II – THE PLUS FACTOR

The Plus Factor shall be claimed at the end of the school year for the summative appraisal. Items claimed in the current appraisal period will not be credited in the succeeding appraisal period.

Teachers who are dedicated in the profession perform some jobs beyond what are required of them. Most of these are voluntary in nature, thus acknowledging the added performance, certain reward in the form of the Plus Factor is provided in the appraisal system.

Each item in the list is equivalent to .04 and a teacher who accomplishes a maximum of 10 items during the appraisal period gets a maximum of .4. The maximum value of .4 or a fraction shall be added to the weighted average on the CB-PAST for the overall rating to the teacher performance. The three components shall have a maximum number of items to be accomplished and claimed by the Teacher to wit: I. Instructional Competence- any four(4) items ; II. School, Home, Community Linkages – any three (3) items and III. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development – any three ( 3 ) items.

Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient, Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the appraisal system.

I. Plus Factor for Instructional Competence

1. Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. 2. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period; for peers, cooperating teachers,

resource teachers in the in-service and pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management.

3. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school. (district or division)

4. Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to Instructional Competence. 5. Innovated teaching parents strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. 7. Maintained zero drop out rate or reduced drop out rate in the class.

II. No Plus Factor for School, Home, Community Linkages

1. Organized and implemented at least home-school-community project in a rating period which resulted to enhanced learning outcomes.

2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics Laboratory, Model Classroom, others)

3. Made at least (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of children.

4. Conducted at least 1 action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement.

5. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage to support their children in their school activities; to reduce absenteeism and tardiness.

6. Others not included but related to school, home and community involvement.

III. Plus Factor for Personal, Social Growth, and Professional Development Characteristics

Page 48: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

1. Received award(s) for exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.

2. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and non- academic contests recognized at least at the division level.

3. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.

4. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed.)

5. Others not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template

Criteria AssignedWeight

No. ofitems

Score Mean(Score ÷No. of items)

Descriptionof the TPI

Weighted Average(Mean x Weight)

I. Instructional Competence 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30%

12

C. Planning, Assessing, and Reporting 20%

9

Sum of Weighted Average of A,B, and C 2.02 II. Home, School, and Community Involvement 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 E. Community linkages 10% 6Sum of Weighted Average of D and E 0.73III. Personal Growth and Professional Development 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional Development

10% 10

Sum of Weighted Average of F and G 0.66Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Average of I, II, III) Description for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal PROFICIENTPlus Factor (For the Summative Appraisal)(Each item gets a 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average)Summative Performance Rating(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from I, II, III and the Plus Factor earned)Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal VS

Teacher Performance Index (TPI)

3.5 - 4.0 - Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all times a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributes, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/ responsibilities are completed beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacheris evident.

2.51 - 3.5 - Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills, abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas.

Page 49: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

1.51 - 2.5 - Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job.

1.0 - 1.5 - Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard. Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teacher may need immediate instructional support.

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG

Overall Performance Rating Description and Critical Requirements for the Summative Appraisal

Description of OverallPerformance Rating

Critical RequirementsNote: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get thelower performance rating.

Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index of below proficient in any of the standards

Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Satisfactory 1.51 – 2.50 and no performance index value of below basic in any of the standards

Unsatisfactory 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index value below basic in any of the standards

Remarks:

Agreements:

I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflect the true and honest evaluation of my teaching performance.

Ratee: ______________

Teacher (Name & Signature)

Date:

CONFERRED WITH: WENERITA A. MIRAFLOR School Head (Name & Signature)

Date:

Page 50: CB-PAST-Form - Copy.doc

Recommending Approval : VICTORIA A. MAQUILING Name & Signature

Date:

Approved by : RAMIR B. UYTICO, Ed.D.

Name & Signature

Date:

DepEd BESRA TED - TWG