Upload
agustin-pennison
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cascades on correlated and modular networks
James P. GleesonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics,
University of Limerick, Ireland
www.ul.ie/gleesonj
Collaborators and funding
Sergey Melnik, UL
Diarmuid Cahalane, UCC (now Cornell)
Rich Braun, University of Delaware
Donal Gallagher, DEPFA Bank
SFI Investigator Award
MACSI (SFI Maths Initiative)
IRCSET Embark studentship
Some areas of interest
Noise effects on oscillators Applications: Microelectronic circuit
design
Diffusion in microfluidic devices Applications: Sorting and mixing
devices
Complex systems Agent-based modelling Dynamics on complex networks Applications: Pricing financial
derivatives
Some areas of interest
Noise effects on oscillators Applications: Microelectronic circuit
design
Diffusion in microfluidic devices Applications: Sorting and mixing
devices
Complex systems Agent-based modelling Dynamics on complex networks Applications: Pricing financial
derivatives
Overview
Structure of complex networks
Dynamics on complex networks
Derivation of main result
Extensions and applications
• J.P. Gleeson and D.J. Cahalane, Phys. Rev. E. 75, 056103 (2007).
• J.P. Gleeson, Phys. Rev. E. 77, 046117 (2008).
Overview
Structure of complex networks
Dynamics on complex networks
Derivation of main result
Extensions and applications
• J.P. Gleeson and D.J. Cahalane, Phys. Rev. E. 75, 056103 (2007).
• J.P. Gleeson, Phys. Rev. E. 77, 046117 (2008).
What is a network?
A collection of N “nodes” or “vertices” which can be labelled i…
…connected by links or “edges”, {i,j}.
Examples:
• World wide web
• Internet
• Social networks
• Networks of neurons
• Coupled dynamical systems
Examples of network structure
The Erdós-Rényi random graph
Consider all possible links,
create any link with a given
probability p.
Degree distribution is Poisson
with mean z:
!k
zep
kz
k
0k
k
z k p
The Small World network
Start with a regular ring having links to k nearest neighbours.
Then visit every link and rewire it with probability p.
[Watts & Strogatz, 1998]
Examples of network structure
Scale-free networks
Many real-world networks (social, internet, WWW) are found to have scale-free degree distributions.
“Scale-free” refers to the
power law form:
kpk ~
Examples of network structure
Examples
[Newman, SIAM Review 2003]
Overview
Structure of complex networks
Dynamics on complex networks
Derivation of main result
Extensions and applications
• J.P. Gleeson and D.J. Cahalane, Phys. Rev. E. 75, 056103 (2007).
• J.P. Gleeson, Phys. Rev. E. 77, 046117 (2008).
Dynamics on networks
• Binary-valued nodes:
• Epidemic models (SIS, SIR)
• Threshold dynamics (Ising model, Watts)
• ODEs at nodes:
• Coupled dynamical systems
• Coupled phase oscillators (Kuramoto model)
Global Cascades and Complex Networks
Structures and dynamics review see: • M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Review 45, 167 (2003).• S.N. Dorogovtsev et al., arXiv:0705.0010 (2007)
Examples of global cascades:
• Epidemics, computer viruses
• Spread of fads and innovations
• Cascading failures in infrastructure (e.g. power grid) networks
Similarity: initial failures increase the likelihood of subsequent failures
Cascade dynamics depends strongly on:
• Network topology (degree distribution, degree-degree correlations,
community structure, clustering)
• Resilience of individual nodes (node response function)
Initially small localized effects can propagate over the whole network, causing a global cascade
Watts` model
D.J. Watts, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99, 5766 (2002).
Threshold dynamics
The network:
• aij is the adjacency matrix (N ×N)
• un-weighted
• undirected
The nodes:
• are labelled i , i from 1 to N;
• have a state ;
• and a threshold ri from some distribution.
{0,1}ija
jiij aa
}1,0{)( tvi
The fraction of nodes in state vi=1 is (t):
Threshold dynamics
Updating: 1 if
unchanged otherwisei i
i
rv
Neighbourhood average:
1i ij j
ji
a vk
}1,0{)( tviNode i has state
irand threshold
Watts` model
D.J. Watts, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99, 5766 (2002).
Watts` model
R
Cascade condition: 1
1
( 1)1k k
k
k kp F
z
Thresholds CDF: ( ) ( )r
F r P s ds
( ) ( )P r r R !
k z
k
z ep
k
Watts` model
Watts: initially activate single node (of N), determine ifat steady state.
Us: initially activate a fraction of the nodes, anddetermine the steady state value of
1
0.
Conditions for global cascades (and dependence on thesize of the seed fraction) follow…
Main result
Our result:
with
0 01 0
(1 ) (1 )k
m k m mk k
k m
kp q q F
m
1 0 0(1 ) ( ),n nq G q 0 0 ,q
and
1
1
1 0
1( ) (1 )
km k m m
k kk m
kkG q p q q F
mz
Derivation: Generalizing zero-temperature random-field Ising model
results from Bethe lattices (D. Dhar, P. Shukla, J.P. Sethna, J. Phys. A 30, 5259 (1997)) to arbitrary-degree random
networks.
Results
30 10
30 5 10
20 10
( ) ( )P r r R !
k z
k
z ep
k
510N
0.18R
Results
40 10
20 10
( ) ( )P r r R
!
k z
k
z ep
k
Main result
Our result:
with
0 01 0
(1 ) (1 )k
m k m mk k
k m
kp q q F
m
1 0 0(1 ) ( ),n nq G q 0 0 ,q
and
1
1
1 0
1( ) (1 )
km k m m
k kk m
kkG q p q q F
mz
Cascade condition
q
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
1 0 0(1 ) ( ),n nq G q 0 0 ,q
G(q)
Cascade condition
q
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
1 0 0(1 ) ( ),n nq G q 0 0 ,q
G(q)
nq
1nq
slope=1
Simple cascade condition
First-order cascade condition: using
demand
1 0 0(1 ) ( ),n nq G q 0 0 ,q
for global cascades to be possible. This yields the condition
reproducing Watts’ percolation result when and
0(1 ) (0) 1G
1
1 0
( 1) 1(0) ,
1k kk
k kp F F
z
0 0 (0) 0.F
slope>1
(slope>1)
Simple cascade condition
40 10
20 10
( ) ( )P r r R
!
k z
k
z ep
k
nq
1nq
slope=1
Extended cascade condition
Second-order cascade condition: expand
to second order and demand no positive zeros of the quadratic
1 0 0(1 ) ( ),n nq G q 0 0 ,q
for global cascades to be possible.
The extension is, to first order in :
2 20(0) 1 2 (0) (0) 2 (0) (0) (0) 2 (0) (0) 0.G G G G G G G G
0
above
02 cbqaq
Extended cascade condition
40 10
20 10
( ) ( )P r r R
!
k z
k
z ep
k
R
Gaussian threshold distribution
0.05
0.2
2
22
1 ( )( ) exp
22
r RP r
!
k z
k
z ep
k
0 0
Gaussian threshold distribution
0.05
0.2
2
22
1 ( )( ) exp
22
r RP r
!
k z
k
z ep
k
0.362
0.2
0.38
R
R
R
510N
0 0
Bifurcation analysis
0.35R
0.371R
0.375R
1 0 0(1 ) ( ),n nq G q
( ) 0q G q
0 0; 0.2
Results: Scale-free networks
( ) ( )P r r R
exp( )kp k k 100
0
0
2
310
10
2
22
1 ( )( ) exp
22
r RP r
0 5
0.2
.4
10.5z
0 0 6z
Results: Scale-free networks
20 10
( ) ( )P r r R
!
k z
k
z ep
k
exp( )kp k k
100
Overview
Structure of complex networks
Dynamics on complex networks
Derivation of main result
Extensions and applications
• J.P. Gleeson and D.J. Cahalane, Phys. Rev. E. 75, 056103 (2007).
• J.P. Gleeson, Phys. Rev. E. 77, 046117 (2008).
Consider undirected unweighted network of N nodes (N is large) defined by degree distribution pk
Watts` model of global cascades
Updating: node i becomes active if the active fraction of its neighbours exceeds its threshold
Each node i has:
• binary state
• fixed threshold given by thresholds CDF
Initially activate fraction ρ0<<1 of N nodes.
The average fraction of active nodes
( ) ( )r
F r P s ds
(probability that a node has threshold < r)
otherwise unchanged
if ,1 ii
i
i
rk
mv
N
i iN tvt1
1 )()(
}1,0{iv
ir
Derivation: Generalizing zero-temperature random-field Ising modelresults from Bethe lattices (D. Dhar, P. Shukla, J.P. Sethna, J. Phys. A 30, 5259 (1997)) to arbitrary-degree random networks.
Derivation of result
A
Main idea: pick a node A at random and calculate its probability of becoming active. This will give ρ(∞).
Derivation of result
Main idea: pick a node A at random and calculate its probability of becoming active. This will give ρ(∞).
Re-arrange the network in the form of a tree with A being the root.
Derivation of result
…………………..
∞
n+2
n+1
n
…………………
…
……
A
…
: probability that a node on level n is active, conditioned on its parent (on level n+1) being inactive.
nq1nq
nq
Main idea: pick a node A at random and calculate its probability of becoming active. This will give ρ(∞).
Re-arrange the network in the form of a tree with A being the root.
1 0
0(1 )nq
(initially active)
(initially inactive)
Derivation of result
…………………..
∞
n+2
n+1
n
…………………
…
……
A
…
: probability that a node on level n is active, conditioned on its parent (on level n+1) being inactive.
nq1nq
nq
Main idea: pick a node A at random and calculate its probability of becoming active. This will give ρ(∞).
Re-arrange the network in the form of a tree with A being the root.
1 0
0(1 )nq
1k
k
p
(initially active)
(initially inactive)
(has degree k; k-1 children)
Derivation of result
…………………..
∞
n+2
n+1
n
…………………
…
……
A
…
: probability that a node on level n is active, conditioned on its parent (on level n+1) being inactive.
nq1nq
nq
(m out of k-1 children active)
mkn
mn qq
m
k
111
k-1 children
Degree distribution of nearest neighbours:
.kk
k pp
z
Main idea: pick a node A at random and calculate its probability of becoming active. This will give ρ(∞).
Re-arrange the network in the form of a tree with A being the root.
1 0
0(1 )nq
1k
k
p
(initially active)
(initially inactive)
(has degree k; k-1 children)
(m out of k-1 children active)
(activated by m active neighbours)
Derivation of result
…………………..
∞
n+2
n+1
n
…………………
…
……
A
…
: probability that a node on level n is active, conditioned on its parent (on level n+1) being inactive.
nq1nq
nq
1
0
k
m
k
mFqq
m
k mkn
mn
111
k-1 children
k
mFqq
m
kp
k
m
mkm
kk
0100 1)1(
k
mFqq
m
kpq
k
m
mkn
mn
kkn
1
0
1
1001 1
1~)1(
00 q
Derivation of result
Valid when:
(i) Network structure is locally tree-like (vanishing clustering coefficient).
(ii) The state of each node is altered at most once.
Our result for the average fraction of active nodes
Conclusions
• Demonstrated an analytical approach to determine the average avalanche size in Watts’model of threshold dynamics.
• Derived extended condition for global cascades to occur; noted strong dependence on seed size.
• Results apply for arbitrary degree distribution, but zero clustering important.
• Further work…
Overview
Structure of complex networks
Dynamics on complex networks
Derivation of main result
Extensions and applications
• J.P. Gleeson and D.J. Cahalane, Phys. Rev. E. 75, 056103 (2007).
• J.P. Gleeson, Phys. Rev. E. 77, 046117 (2008).
Extensions
• Generalized dynamics:• SIR-type epidemics• Percolation • K-core sizes
• Degree-degree correlations • Modular networks
• Asynchronous updating
• Non-zero clustering
k
mFqq
m
kp
k
m
mkm
kk
0100 1)1(
k
mFqq
m
kpq
k
m
mkn
mn
kkn
1
0
1
1001 1
1~)1(
00 q
Derivation of result
Our result for the average fraction of active nodes
Generalization to other dynamical models
k
mCDFkmF thr,Fraction of active neighbours (Watts):
mCDFkmF thr,Absolute number of active neighbours:
mpkmF )1(1, Bond percolation:
0m if,
0m if ,0,
kQkmFSite percolation:
kmFqqm
kp
k
m
mkm
kk ,1)1(
0100
kmFqqm
kpq
k
m
mkn
mn
kkn ,1
1~)1(1
0
1
1001
00 q
Our result for the average fraction of active nodes
Kmk
KmkkmF
if,1
if ,0,
K-core: the largest subgraph of a network whose nodes have degree at least K
Initially activate (damage) fraction ρ0 of nodes.A node becomes active if it has fewer than K inactive neighbours:
Final inactive fraction (1- ρ) of the total network gives the size of K-core
Generalization to other dynamical models
kmFqqm
kp
k
m
mkm
kk ,1)1(
0100
kmFqqm
kpq
k
m
mkn
mn
kkn ,1
1~)1(1
0
1
1001
00 q
Our result for the average fraction of active nodes
K-core sizes on degree-degree correlated networks
Initial damage ρ0
r = 0
r = -0.5
r = 0.98
Theory vs Numerics:7-cores in Poisson random graphs with z = 10
Case r = 0 considered in S.N. Dorogovtsev et al., PRL 96, 040601 (2006).
Adopt approach of M. Newman for percolation problems (PRE 67, 026126 (2003), PRL 89, 208701 (2002)).
Degree-degree correlated networks
P(k,k’) – joint PDF that an edge connects vertices with degrees k, k’
)(1
knq – probability that a k-degree node is active
(conditioned on its parent being inactive)
– probability that a child of an inactive k-degree node is active
k
knkk
n kkP
qkkPq
),(
),( )()(
n+1
…………………..
………………
…
…… Consider a k-degree node at level n+1:
n
kmFqqm
kq
k
m
mkkn
mkn
kkkn ,1
1)1(
1
0
1)()()(0
)(0
)(1
)(0
)(0
kkq
k
knkk
n kkP
qkkPq
),(
),( )()(
kmFqqm
kk
m
mkkn
mkn
kkkn ,1)1(
0
)()()(0
)(0
)(1
)(knk kn p
Degree-degree correlated networks
(Also obtain a cascade condition in matrix form).
Pearson correlation r
Degree-degree correlated networks
Initial damage ρ0
r = 0
r = -0.5
r = 0.98
Correlated networks (105 nodes) generated using Gaussian copula.
Theory (curves) vs Numerics (symbols):7-cores in Poisson random graphs with z = 10
kk kk
kkkk
kkkPkkPk
kkkPkkPkkr
,
2
,
2
2
,,
),(),(
),(),( Case r = 0 considered in S.N. Dorogovtsev et al., PRL 96, 040601 (2006).
(zero initial damage)
Predicting K-cores in CAIDA internet router network
Internet router network structure from www.caida.org
Degree distributionDegree-degree
correlation matrix
k
k
k
( , )P k kkp
kp
Predicting K-cores in CAIDA internet router network
Predicted from analysis of degree distribution only (see S.N. Dorogovtsev et al., PRL 96, 040601 (2006)).
Actual size
Us: Predicted from analysis of degree distribution and degree-degree correlation.
Internet router network structure from www.caida.org
Similar idea, but instead of P(k,k’) use the mixing matrix e, which quantifies connections between different communities.
Modular networks; asynchronous updating
j ij
jnj iji
n e
qeq
)(
)(
)( )()()(1
in
iin qh
Asynchronous updating gives continuous time evolution:
)()()()( iiii qh
)( )()()(1
in
iin qgq
)()()()( iiii qqgq
Modular networks example
Summary
Structure of complex networks
Dynamics on complex networks
Derivation of main result
Extensions and applications
• J.P. Gleeson and D.J. Cahalane, Phys. Rev. E. 75, 056103 (2007).
• J.P. Gleeson, Phys. Rev. E. 77, 046117 (2008).
Cascades on correlated and modular networks
James P. GleesonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics,
University of Limerick, Ireland
www.ul.ie/gleesonj
What is best “random” model for the Internet?
Jellyfish model:Siganos et al., J. Comm. Networks ‘06
Medusa model:Carmi et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. ‘07
Internet structure using router data from CAIDA
kp
k
Transmissibility (bond Occupation probability)
DEPFA Bank collaboration: CDO pricing
m1 p1
mN pN
m2 p2
m3 p3
m4 p4
Definitions
mi
Notional of credit i
pi
Default probability of credit i, (derived from the CDS quote).
Sq
Fair price for protection against losses in tranche q
ProblemExisting models fail to reproduce the prices (Sq) observed on the market.
{m1, m2,…,mN}{p1, p2,…,pN} {S1, S2,
…,Ss}Correlation Structure
?
0 to 5%
10% to 15%
15% to 25%
25% to 35%
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5 35% to 100%
An external fieldStochastic Dynamics on Networks
Hysteresis: PRGStochastic Dynamics on Networks
Hysteresis: PRGStochastic Dynamics on Networks
Stochastic dynamics
Aim: Fundamental understanding of the interactions between nonlinear dynamical systems and
random fluctuations.
External noise sources e.g. transistor noise, thermal noise.
Heterogeneity within system e.g. agent-based models, large-scale networks.
Tools:• Numerical simulations …guiding fundamental understanding via…• Asymptotic methods• Perturbation techniques• Exact solutions
Noise in oscillators (Theme 1)
Prof. M. P. Kennedy, Microelectronic Engineering, UCC New computational and
asymptotic methods for the spectrum of an oscillator subject to white noise
Stochastic perturbation methods for effects of coloured noise
Collaboration (Feely/Kennedy):Noise effects in digital phase-
locked loops
Papers: • SIAM J. Appl. Math.• IEEE TCAS
Microfluidic mixing and sorting (Theme 3)
Experimentalists at Tyndall National Institute, Cork
Analysis of MHD micromixing in annular geometries
Modelling of micro-sortingmethods
Collaborations: (Lindenberg/Sancho)Noise-induced sorting techniques for
microparticles
Papers: • SIAM J. Appl. Math.• Phys. Rev E• Phys. Fluids
Cascades on correlated and modular networks
James P. GleesonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics,
University of Limerick, Ireland
www.ul.ie/gleesonj