Cap Bud Techniques

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    1/36

    A Comparison of Capital Budgeting Techniques

    With definitions and exemplifications

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    2/36

    Capital budgetingCapital budgeting

    Cost/benefit analysis:Cost/benefit analysis:

    Estimating the value of investment projectsEstimating the value of investment projects

    Making informed choicesMaking informed choices

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    3/36

    Capital Budgeting Techniques

    A collection of methods allowing the manager to choose among a

    variety of investment projects.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    4/36

    P

    roblem

    Value, rank and select investment projects

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    5/36

    Exemplification

    Project : Project : Project :

    R q ir r t 7.7% 3% 6%

    r 1: $400 $100 $5,200

    r 2 $1,250 $200 $4,000

    r 3 $900 $150 $1,000

    r 4 $3,000 $100 $200

    r 5 $1,000 $50 $100

    I iti l C st $5,045 $490.67 $9,687.23

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    6/36

    Clarifications

    Re uired rate: a fair discount rate given each projects risk

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    7/36

    MethodsMethods

    Average Accounting ReturnAverage Accounting Return PaybackPayback

    Discounted paybackDiscounted payback Internal Rate ofReturnInternal Rate ofReturn Modified Internal Rate ofReturnModified Internal Rate ofReturn Net Present ValueNet Present Value Profitability IndexProfitability Index

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    8/36

    Average Accounting Return

    AAR is the ratio of the Average Net Income to the Average Book Value.

    Decision rule

    Take the project ifAAR is greater than some target ratio set by accountants.

    Disadvantages

    It has too many flaws, don't ever use it.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    9/36

    P

    ayback period

    PB is the time it takes to recover the initial cost of theinvestment

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    10/36

    Payback period

    Decision rule

    Take the project with the shortest payback period

    Disadvantages

    Ignores time value of money Ignores risk

    Ignores cash inflows beyond the cutoff point

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    11/36

    Payback period

    In our example:

    project C: . years

    project B: . years

    projectA: . years

    All three projects are viable

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    12/36

    Discounted payback period

    DPB is the time it takes to recover the initial cost of the investment

    PB uses nominal CF DPB uses discounted CF

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    13/36

    Discounted payback period

    Decision rule

    Take the project with the shortest discounted payback period.

    Disadvantages

    DPB ignores cash inflows beyond the cutoff point

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    14/36

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    15/36

    Internal Rate of Return

    IRR is the discount rate that makes the present value of theproject e ual to its initial cost.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    16/36

    Internal Rate of Return

    Decision rule

    Take the project If the IRR exceeds the re uired rate of return

    Disadvantages

    Reinvestment rate assumption is unrealistic Multiple IRR

    IRR cannot rank mutually exclusive projects

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    17/36

    Internal Rate of Return Calculation

    Set: Initial cost = PV(project)$5,045 = $400/(1+r) +$1,250/(1+r)2 +$900/(+r)3 +$3,000/(1+r)4 +$1,000/(1+r)5

    r = .

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    18/36

    Internal Rate of Return

    IRR(A) =

    IRR(B) =IRR(C) = .

    Only A andB are viable

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    19/36

    Modified Internal Rate of Return

    MIRR is the discount rate that makes the future value of the projecte ual to its initial cost.

    MIRRrequires a reinvestment rate.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    20/36

    Modified Internal Rate of Return

    Decision rule

    Take the project if MIRR is larger than the re uired rate.

    Disadvantages

    MIRR cannot rank mutually exclusive projects.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    21/36

    MIRR calculation

    Project A

    Set FV(at ) = , (1+MIRR)

    MIRR =

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    22/36

    MIRR calculation

    MIRR(A) =

    MIRR(B) = .

    MIRR(C) =

    Only A andB are viable

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    23/36

    NPV

    Net Present Value is the difference between the present value of aproject and its initial cost

    NPV = PV - Initial cost

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    24/36

    NPV

    Decision rule

    If NPV is positive, take the project.

    Disadvantages

    Very complex analysis, too many variables to forecast

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    25/36

    NPV:Corollary

    Required Rate = IRR NPV = 0

    and vice-versa.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    26/36

    NPV calculation

    projectA:

    PV =$400/(1.077) +$1,250/(1.077)2 +$900/(1.077)3 +$3,000/(1.077)4 +$1,000/(1.077)5

    PV=$5,089.36

    NPV= Present value - Initial Cost

    NPV = , . - , = .

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    27/36

    NPV calculation

    NPV(A)= +$44.

    NPV(B)= +$64.17

    NPV(C)= -$148.81

    Only A andB are viable

    B is better because it adds more value

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    28/36

    The Profitability Index

    The profitability index is the ratio of project PV to initial cost

    PI = PV/Initial cost

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    29/36

    The Profitability Index

    Decision rule

    Take the project if PI > 1

    Disadvantages

    PI cannot rank mutually exclusive projects.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    30/36

    PI calculation

    Project A:

    PI(A) = PV(A)/Initial cost = , 89. 6/$5, 45

    PI(A) = 1. 88

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    31/36

    PI Calculation

    PI(A) = 1. 88

    PI(B) = 1.131

    PI(C) = .9846

    Only A andB are viable

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    32/36

    Why cant PI rank the projects?

    Exemplification

    P r o j e c t x P r o j e c t y

    P r e s e n t a l e $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,0 0 0

    In i t ia l c o s t $ 2 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,0 0 0

    P I 1 .0 4 2 3

    N P $ 1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,0 0 0

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    33/36

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    34/36

    Answer

    NPV rules.

    Always.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    35/36

    Important side note

    In project valuation, measures of absolute wealth are moreappropriate than measures of relative efficiency.

  • 8/9/2019 Cap Bud Techniques

    36/36

    j j j

    i 7.7% % %

    $5, 5 $490. 7 $9,6 7.2

    l $5,089. 6 $554.84 9,5 8.42

    F l (5% $7,075.45 $67 .45 $12,363.5

    i 3.83 3.41 2.49 *

    i 4.94 3.76 * N/A

    IRR 8%* 8%* 5%

    MIRR 7%* 6.54%* 5%

    N l $44.36* $64.17* ($148.81

    i ili i x 1.0088* 1.131* 0.9846