C A N T O N P U B L I C S C H O O L SComprehensive Facilities Assessment

3.23.2017 School Committee

• Introductions

• Schedule & Process Overview

• Progress Update

• Enrollment Targets

• Facilities & Educational Space Needs Assessments

• Principals’ Workshops’ Outcomes

• Visioning Session #2 Outcomes

• District Administration Programming

• Next Steps

A g e n d a

JAN FEBDECNOV MAR APR MAY/ JUN JUL

Submit SOI

= Public Meetings

Develop Options & Cost Estimates

Facilities

Assessments

Visioning #2Visioning #1

Kick-

Off

Review &

Sequence w/

Facilities

Principals’

Workshops

Visioning #3

Community

Final

Report

Present to

School

Committee

Data

Gathering &

Document

Review

Educational

Analysis

Facilities

Walkthroug

h

Report

Findings

Report

Findings

= Working Group Meetings

Report

Findings

Report

Findings

P r o c e s s O v e r v i e w

Facilities Assessments • Code • Architectural elements• Structural assessment • Systems: mechanical,

electrical, plumbing • Site & Civil assessment • Safety & Security

Programmatic Analysis • MSBA Comparative Analysis• Utilization Analyses• Principals’ Interviews• Visioning Sessions• Principals’ workshops

Options• District-wide• Site-specific short list• Cost Estimates

Enrollment Targets

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

Stu

den

ts

School Year

Preliminary Grade Grouping ForecastMcKibben Demographics - January 2017

K-5 Projection

6-8 Projection

9-12 Projection

1,510 1,497 1,484

883 954 959

760 787821

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

Stu

den

ts

School Year

Preliminary Grade Grouping Forecast – Target EnrollmentsMcKibben Demographics - January 2017

K-5 Projection

6-8 Projection

9-12 Projection

1,510 1,497 1,484

883 954 959

760 787821

1,578

1,014

839

175

PreK Projection

Space Needs Assessments

Luce

Sch

oo

l

MSBA77,639

Existing67,338

Can

ton

HS

MSBA188,892

Existing249,798

Dis

tric

t-W

ide

MSBA565,710

Existing630,710

Capacity400

Current493

Capacity1,514

Current954 Capacity

3,796

Current3,379

SF Students

JFK

Sch

oo

l

MSBA78,627

Existing59,923

Capacity350

Current503

Ro

dm

an E

CC

MSBA16,200

-Existing53,965

Capacity300

Current90

MSBA78,432

Existing69,330

Capacity417

Current501H

anse

n S

cho

ol

MSBA125,920

Existing130,356

Capacity815

Current787G

alvi

n M

S

s p a c e n e e d s a n a l y s e s - c a p a c i t y

s p a c e n e e d s a n a l y s e s - c a p a c i t y b y c l a s s r o o m c o u n t

School 2016-2017 Enrollment

Capacity @ 18 Students/ Class Full-Day K,

23 Students/ Class 1st-12th Grades

71% Utilization Rate 7-12

Capacity @ 23 Students/ Class 1st-

12th Grades85% Utilization Rate

7-12

Rodman Early Childhood Center 90 90 -

Hansen Elementary School 501 506 -

JFK Elementary School 503 492 -

Luce Elementary School 493 488 -

Galvin Middle School 787 800 958

Canton High School 954 914 1095

s p a c e n e e d s a n a l y s e s - L o n g R a n g e C l a s s r o o m N e e d

School 2016-2017 Enrollment

Target Enrollments

Total Existing Classrooms/

Teaching Stations

Total Projected

Need Classrooms/

Teaching Stations @

71% U

Total Projected

Need Classrooms/

Teaching Stations @85% U

Projected Need for

Additional Classrooms/ Teaching Stations @71% U

Projected Need for

Additional Classrooms/

Teaching Stations @85% U

Rodman Early Childhood Center 90 175 6 12 12 6 -

Hansen Elementary School 501 526 25 26 26 1 -

JFK Elementary School 503 526 24 26 26 2 -

Luce Elementary School 493 526 24 26 26 2 -

Galvin Middle School 787 839 49 51 43 2 -6

Canton High School 954 1014 56 62 52 6 -4

p r o g r a m m a t i c s p a c e n e e d s s u m m a r y

Capacity - GSF Capacity – CR Count Classroom Size UtilizationMissing/

Inappropriate space

Roman ECC-

Canton High School

Galvin Middle School

JFK ES

Hansen ES

Luce ES

Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor

U p d a t e o n F a c i l i t y A s s e s s m e n t s

SITE EXTERIOR INTERIOR

Circulation RoofWalls, Windows,

and Doors Thermal MEP/FP Finishes ADAHealth, Safety,

and Welfare

Canton HS

Galvin MS

Hansen ES

JFK ES

Luce ES

Rodman ECC

Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor

M E/FP

*

*Ratings indicate 1969 portions of building. New addition and its project components are in Excellent condition.

Principals’ Workshops’ Outcomes

G u i d i n g D e s i g n P r i n c i p l e s

• Assume PK-5

• Grade Level Teams

• Flexible, Collaborative Space that can

Adapt to Educational Needs over Time

• Access to Outdoor Learning

• Indoor Environmental Quality –

Thermal Comfort & Daylight

• Separate Public & Private

• Parity Across Schools

• Dedicated Special Ed Space at all

Grade Levels

MainEntrance

Principals’ Workshops: ES

G u i d i n g D e s i g n P r i n c i p l e s

• Unifying multi-purpose commons

• Space that promotes Collaboration

• Access to technology

• Make learning visible

• Prioritize Flexibility – Space & Furniture

• Access to outdoor learning

• Separation of public & private

• Support Global Learning

Principals’ Workshops: MS

MainEntrance

Principals’ Workshops: HS

P o s s i b l e T a r g e t e d I n t e r v e n t i o n s

• Media Center

• Lower Fields/ Parking Reconfiguration

• Computer Labs

• Performing Arts Space

L i b r a r y / M e d i a

Principals’ Workshops: HS

L i b r a r y / M e d i a

Principals’ Workshops: HS

Visioning Session #2 Outcomes

V i s i o n i n g S e s s i o n # 2 – K e y T a k e - a w a y s

Grade Configuration

• The District is not afraid to

consider change

When developing options, D&W

will explore:

• PK | K-5 | 6-8 | 9-12

• PK-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-12

• PK-3 | 4-7 | 8-12

School Size

• Elementary: 300-500 students

• Middle School: 600-800

students

• High School: 900-1,200

students

Location of Pre-K

• Early childhood model is

preferred

District Administration

Program

D i s t r i c t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n

• ~21,500 GSF desired

• ~16,000 GSF existing

• Space needs & functionality may change depending on preferred

location of DA

• Rodman location will be considered for other programmed functions

including DA as part of master plan options development. Future use will

be dependent on outcome of preferred option

• Procurement process with developer driven option should be reviewed

• Begin Master Plan Options Development

• Generate Evaluation Criteria & Prioritize Master Plan

Options

N e x t S t e p s

o p t i o n s - d i s t r i c t - w i d e e x a m p l e

Weight Criteria

18 Building Condition

14 Alignment with Enrollment

18 Missing & Inappropriate Spaces/ Alignment between Education & Facility

6 Time to Completion

6 School Size

3 Building Size

9 Building Count & Location3 Transportation Costs

3 Operating Costs

3 HR Costs

6 Grade Configuration

6 Enrollment Parity at Elementary Schools

14 Impact the Most Students

100

o p t i o n s – e v a l u a t i o n c r i t e r i a e x a m p l e

o p t i o n s – s i t e t e s t f i t s e x a m p l e

Option Building Config Enrollment Bldg GSF Parking Phasing Notes

C-1At GatesPRIORITY

1

New Twin School Grades 1-6

421 + 421= 842 total

69,837*2 = 139,674 sf

168 1. Construct New School on Gates site2. Move 1-6 students from Gates, Conant and Douglas into

new school3. Move K students from Gates and Douglas into Conant4. Demolish Gates and complete sitework5. Take Douglas offline –

LEGEND

Wooded swamp/ wetland200’ resource area 100’ wetland buffer1% flood plain100’ resource area200’ resource areaHydro connectionsStream

N

QUESTIONS