3
Can Eastern Europe Catch Up Without Structural Funds? s things look today, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe will, except for Bulgaria nd Romania, all have joined the European Union in another two years' time. The forth- coming accession round will be the most far-reaching in the EU's history. Never before have so many countries joined at the same time and never before has there been so wide a gap between the established and the new member states in their economic development levels. Both because the accession countries lag so far behind in terms of per capita incomes and because the role of agriculture is still significant in their economies, there would need to be a considerable flow of support from the Structural Funds and the Common Agricultural Policy into Eastern Europe if the new entrants were treated by the same standards as exist- ing member states. The way things are going, the benefits the accession countries obtain from EU financial aid are likely to be pretty meagre at least until 2006. Aid from the Structural Funds will not flow to the new members until they have established the administrative struc- tures the EU requires. A thorough restructuring of the flow of EU funds would not be con- ceivable until the 2007-2013 budgetary planning period. Yet even then, it is highly doubtful whether financial aid within the Union would be substantially focused on the new members, as the countries that have benefited most up to now have already signalled their intention to defend their entitlements even after 2006. These limited prospects of receiving substantial financial aid from the EU are a great disappointment for the accession countries, whose hopes of receiving substantial transfer payments had been a substantial motive for seeking EU membership. It is difficult to convey to the people in these countries that the flow of funds will be much smaller than anticipated. However, quite another issue is whether there is not a tendency to vastly overestimate the part EU financial assistance will play in Eastern Europe's endeavours to close the econom ic development gap. The candidate countries have often claimed that they will never be able to catch up without this monetary aid. In fact, having come through the transition crisis of the mid-1990s, the Central and Eastern European countries have already done a substantial amount of catching up. These countries' foreign trade now focuses strongly on Western Europe, and most of them have developed into attractive locations for foreign investment. Except for short periods in par- ticular countries, economic growth in Eastern Europe over the past eight years has been higher than in the European Union. Thus the gap in per capita incomes between Western and Eastern Europe has narrowed, though admittedly it is still very large. With the excep- tion of Poland, the Central and Eastern European economies have remained more buoyant - some of them much more so - during the EU's current recessionary phase, and forecasts for the years ahead are better for Eastern Europe than they are for EU membe r states. In oth- er words, the catching-up process is already taking place, and so far it has operated without the candidate countries having received any appreciable transfer payments from the EU's coffers. The dynamism has been driven by reforms designed to encourage efficient markets in these countries and to step up their integration into the international division of labour, on a world and more especially on a European scale. What will happen after the EU's eastward enlargement? Will the accession countries be able to continue closing the economic development gap, or will the process run out of steam without substantial help from the Structural Funds? In terms of their economic fundamen- tals, the new members will retain a good chance of continuing to close the gap. Their labour endowments and labour costs give them a clear advantage. As studies for Western Europe- an economies have shown, advantages in factor endowm ents have a significant influence on cross-border investment decisions, to a degree that can more than compensate for a pe- 230 Intereconomics, September/October 2002

Can Eastern Europe Catch Up Without Structural Funds

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Can Eastern Europe Catch Up Without Structural Funds

8/8/2019 Can Eastern Europe Catch Up Without Structural Funds

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/can-eastern-europe-catch-up-without-structural-funds 1/2

C a n E a s t e r n E u r o p e C a t c h U pW i tho ut S t ruc tu ra l Fund s?

s t h i n g s l o o k t o d a y , t h e c o u n t r i e s o f C e n t r a l a n d E a s t e r n E u r o p e w i ll , e x c e p t f o r B u l g a r i an d R o m a n i a , a ll h a v e j o i n e d t h e E u r o p e a n U n i o n i n a n o t h e r t w o y e a r s ' t im e . T h e f o r th -

c o m i n g a c c e s s i o n r o u n d w i l l b e t h e m o s t f a r -r e a c h i n g i n t h e E U ' s h is to ry . N e v e r b e f o r e h a v e

s o m a n y c o u n t r ie s j o i n e d a t t h e s a m e t im e a n d n e v e r b e f o r e h a s t h e r e b e e n s o w i d e a g a p

b e t w e e n t h e e s t a b l is h e d a n d t h e n e w m e m b e r s t a t e s i n t h e i r e c o n o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t l e ve ls .

B o t h b e c a u s e t h e a c c e s s i o n c o u n t r i e s l a g s o f a r b e h i n d in te r m s o f p e r c a p i t a i n c o m e s a n d

because the ro le o f ag r i cu l t u re i s s t i l l s i gn i f i can t i n t he i r economies , t he re wou ld need to

b e a c o n s i d e r a b l e f lo w o f s u p p o r t f r o m t h e S t r u c tu r a l F u n d s a n d t h e C o m m o n A g r i c u lt u r a l

P o l i c y in t o E a s t e r n E u r o p e i f t h e n e w e n t r a n t s w e r e tr e a t e d b y t h e s a m e s t a n d a r d s a s e x i s t -

i n g m e m b e r s t a t e s . T h e w a y t h i n g s a r e g o i n g , t h e b e n e f i t s t h e a c c e s s i o n c o u n t r i e s o b t a i n

f rom EU f inanc ia l a i d a re l ike l y t o b e p re t t y m eag re a t l eas t un t il 2006 . A id f r om the S t ruc tu ra l

F u n d s w i l l n o t fl o w t o t h e n e w m e m b e r s u n til t h e y h a v e e s t a b l i s h e d t h e a d m i n i s tr a t iv e s t r u c -

t u r e s th e E U r e q u i re s . A th o r o u g h r e s t ru c t u r in g o f t h e f l o w o f E U f u n d s w o u l d n o t b e c o n -

c e i v a b l e u n t il t h e 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 1 3 b u d g e t a r y p l a n n i n g p e r io d . Y e t e v e n t h e n , i t i s h i g h ly d o u b t f u l

w h e t h e r fi n a n c ia l a i d w i th i n t h e U n i o n w o u l d b e s u b s t a n t ia l ly f o c u s e d o n t h e n e w m e m b e r s ,

a s t h e c o u n t r i e s t h a t h a v e b e n e f i t e d m o s t u p t o n o w h a v e a l re a d y s i g n a ll e d t h e i r in t e n t io n t o

d e f e n d t h e i r e n t it l e m e n t s e v e n a f t e r 2 0 0 6 .

The se l im i ted p rosp ec ts o f r ece i v i ng subs tan t i a l f i nanc ia l a i d f r om th e EU a re a g rea t

d i s a p p o i n t m e n t f o r t h e a c c e s s i o n c o u n t r i e s , w h o s e h o p e s o f r e c e i v i n g s u b s t a n t i a l t r a n s f e r

p a y m e n t s h a d b e e n a s u b s ta n t ia l m o t i v e f o r s e e k i n g E U m e m b e r s h i p . I t i s d i f fi c u lt t o c o n v e y

t o t h e p e o p l e i n t h e s e c o u n t r ie s t h a t t h e f l o w o f f u n d s w i l l b e m u c h s m a l le r th a n a n t i c ip a t e d .

H o w e v e r , q u i t e a n o t h e r i s s u e is w h e t h e r t h e r e i s n o t a t e n d e n c y t o v a s t l y o v e r e s t i m a t e t h e

p a r t E U f i n a n c ia l a s s i s t a n c e w i l l p l a y i n E a s te r n E u r o p e ' s e n d e a v o u r s t o c l o s e t h e e c o n o m i cd e v e l o p m e n t g a p . T h e c a n d i d a t e c o u n t r i e s h a v e o f te n c l a i m e d t h a t t h e y w i l l n e v e r b e a b l e to

c a t c h u p w i t h o u t t h i s m o n e t a r y a i d .

I n f a c t , h a v i n g c o m e t h r o u g h t h e t r a n s i t i o n c r i s i s o f t h e m i d - 1 9 9 0 s , t h e C e n t r a l a n d

E a s t e r n E u r o p e a n c o u n t r ie s h a v e a lr e a d y d o n e a s u b s t a n ti a l a m o u n t o f c a t c h i n g u p . T h e s e

c o u n t r i e s ' f o r e i g n t r a d e n o w f o c u s e s s t r o n g l y o n W e s t e r n E u r o p e , a n d m o s t o f t h e m h a v e

d e v e l o p e d i n to a t t r a c ti v e l o c a t i o n s f o r f o re i g n i n v e s t m e n t . E x c e p t f o r s h o r t p e r i o d s i n p a r -

t i c u l a r c o u n t r i e s , e c o n o m i c g r o w t h i n E a s t e r n E u r o p e o v e r t h e p a s t e i g h t y e a r s h a s b e e n

h i g h e r t h a n i n t h e E u r o p e a n U n i o n . T h u s t h e g a p i n p e r c a p i t a i n c o m e s b e t w e e n W e s t e r n

and Eas te rn Eu rope has na r rowed , t hough adm i t t ed l y i t i s s t i l l ve ry l a rge . W i th t he excep -

t io n o f P o l a n d , th e C e n t r a l a n d E a s t e r n E u r o p e a n e c o n o m i e s h a v e r e m a i n e d m o r e b u o y a n t

- s o m e o f th e m m u c h m o r e s o - d u r i n g t h e E U ' s c u r r e n t re c e s s i o n a r y p h a s e , a n d f o r e c a s t sf o r t h e y e a r s a h e a d a r e b e t t e r fo r E a s t e r n E u r o p e t h a n t h e y a r e f o r E U m e m b e r s t a t e s . I n o t h -

e r w o r d s , t h e c a t c h i n g - u p p r o c e s s i s a l r e a d y t a k i n g p l a c e , a n d s o f a r i t h a s o p e r a t e d w i t h o u t

t h e c a n d i d a t e c o u n t r i e s h a v i n g r e c e i v e d a n y a p p r e c i a b l e t r a n s f e r p a y m e n t s f r o m t h e E U ' s

c o f fe r s . T h e d y n a m i s m h a s b e e n d r i v e n b y r e f o rm s d e s i g n e d t o e n c o u r a g e e f f ic i e n t m a r k e t s

in t hese co un t r i es an d to s tep u p the i r in teg ra t i on i n to t he i n te rna t i ona l d i v i s i on o f l abour , on

a w o r l d a n d m o r e e s p e c i a l ly o n a E u r o p e a n s c a l e .

W h a t w i ll h a p p e n a f t e r t h e E U ' s e a s t w a r d e n l a r g e m e n t ? W i ll t h e a c c e s s i o n c o u n t r i e s b e

a b l e t o c o n t i n u e c l o s i n g t h e e c o n o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t g a p , o r w il l t h e p r o c e s s r u n o u t o f s te a m

w i t h o u t s u b s t a n t i a l h e l p f r o m t h e S t r u c t u r a l F u n d s ? I n t e r m s o f t h e i r e c o n o m i c f u n d a m e n -

t a ls , t h e n e w m e m b e r s w i l l re t a in a g o o d c h a n c e o f c o n t i n u i n g t o c l o s e t h e g a p . T h e i r l a b o u r

e n d o w m e n t s a n d l a b o u r c o s t s g i v e t h e m a c le a r a d v a n ta g e . A s s t u d i e s f o r W e s t e r n E u r o p e -a n e c o n o m i e s h a v e s h o w n , a d v a n t a g e s in f a c t o r e n d o w m e n t s h a v e a s i g n i fi c a n t i n f lu e n c e

o n c r o s s - b o r d e r i n v e s t m e n t d e c i s i o n s , t o a d e g r e e t h a t c a n m o r e t h a n c o m p e n s a t e f o r a p e -

2 3 0 I n t e re c o n o m i c s , S e p t e m b e r / O c t o b e r 2 0 0 2

Page 2: Can Eastern Europe Catch Up Without Structural Funds

8/8/2019 Can Eastern Europe Catch Up Without Structural Funds

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/can-eastern-europe-catch-up-without-structural-funds 2/2

r iphe ra l g eog raph ica l loca tion. Indeed , the speed w i th w h ich the econom ies o f the cohes ion

coun t r ies I re land , Spa in and Po r tuga l made up g round a f te r the i r en t ry in to the Eu ropean

Co mm un i ty bea rs th is ou t. M oreove r , in con t ras t to the cohes ion coun t r ies a num ber o f the

cand ida tes fo r access ion a lso bene f i t f rom a re la t i ve ly cen t ra l l oca t ion w i th in an en la rged

European eco nom ic area ( th is ho lds for the Cze ch Republ ic , S loven ia and pa rts o f Hungary ,

Po land and Slovak ia) .Howeve r , i t wou ld be fa ta l l y w rong to imag ine tha t the ca tch ing -up p rocess w i l l con t inue

v i r tua l l y au toma t ica l ly fo r the Cen t ra l and Eas tern Eu ropean coun t r ies on ce they have jo ined

the EU. In rea li ty , qu i te the reve rse i s t rue . Th e access ion o f any ne w m em ber to an in teg ra -

t ion area inev i tab ly heats up the compet i t ion among locat ions, and the increased r iva l ry

a f fec ts the access ion coun t r ies jus t the same. Thus the po ten tial oppo r tun i t ies to ca tch up

increase , bu t so too do the r i sks o f s tay ing beh ind . In o the r wo rds , a coun t ry ' s po l i c ies as re -

ga rds i t s a t t rac t iveness as a bus iness loca tion assum e a g rea te r respons ib i li t y fo r i t s eoono -

my ' s ove ral l ab i l i t y to c lose the d eve lopm en t gap . Eve ry (access ion ) coun t ry has to look a f te r

mac roeconomic s tab i l i t y , to s t i ck cons is ten t l y to and upho ld marke t -o r ien ted re fo rms . On ly

then wi l l i t a t t rac t inward investment and be in a pos i t ion to u t i l ise i ts domest ic resources

eff ic iently . A num ber o f Centra l and E astern European cou ntr ies have found ou t the hardwa y in recen t yea rs tha t po l i c ies de t r imen ta l to these requi remen ts w i ll cause a se tback in

c los ing the deve lopm en t gap , nam e ly Bu lga r ia (1996 -1997 ), Rom an ia (1996 -1999 ) and the

Czech Repub l i c (1997 -1999 ) . Greece o f fe rs a te l l i ng examp le show ing tha t EU en t ry does

no t gua ran tee tha t the ec ono m y w i ll ca tch up . A f te r ente ring the EC in 1981 , the coun t ry pu r -

sued ra the r unconv inc ing m ac roecon om ic po l i c ies fo r a cons ide rab le pe r iod, i t s s t ruc tu ra l

po l ic ies were geared to cons erv ing ex is t ing industr ies , and i t fa iled to m ode rn ise i ts adm in-

i st ra t ive sys tems . Th us even though i t rece ived subs tan t ia l sum s f rom the S t ruc tu ra l Funds

- on a sca le no less than Portuga l , Spa in or I re land - i ts income per head fe l l back re la t ive

to the EU average. N ot unti l Gre ece had ma de goo d so me of i ts se l f- in fl ic ted def ic ienc ies in

the ea r ly 1990s d id i t, too , beg in to ga in g round re la t ive to the EU ave rage pe r cap i ta income.

Any coun t r ies pu rsu ing poo r Ioca t iona l po l i c ies a f te r access ion w ou ld be des t ined to haves im i la r expe r iences . They wou ld de te r inves tmen t, the i r g rowth wou ld s lacken , and tha t de -

ve lopm en t gap w ou ld s to p c losing. Acce ss to the EU 's S t ruc tu ra l Funds , on howeve r la rge a

sca le , wou ld d o l i tt le or noth ing to cha nge th is s i tuation.

Eas te rn G erma ny o f fe rs a good e xam p le o f how l i tt le im pac t t rans fe r payme n ts can have

i f marke t -ope ra ted fo rce rs a re insu ff ic ien t to sup po r t g row th . The re has p robab ly neve r been

a reg ion , in the recen t pas t o r a t any o the r time , wh ich has rece ived so m uch s upp o r t f rom

o th e rs ; i n th i s c a s e th e b u l k c a m e f r o m w e s te rn G e rm a n y a n d s o m e a l s o fr o m th e E U S t ru c -

tu ra l Funds. In the f i rs t ha l f o f the 1990s , eas te rn Germ any ' s econom y w as g row ing w i th

som e dynam ism, ye t s ince 1997 , i t has been fa ll ing back re la t ive to the wes te rn pa r t o f the

coun t ry even though the vo lum e o f trans fe r paym en ts i s und im in ished . The reg ion ' s g rowth

is now among the weakes t in the en t i re Eu ropean Un ion . Ev iden t l y , the t rans fe r paymen tshave no t managed to b r ing abou t any las t ing , tho roughgo ing improvemen t in supp ly -s ide

condi t ions in eastern Germany. In part icu lar , deve lopment there has been very d isappoin t ing

com pared w i th the p rog ress tha t Cen tra l and Eas te rn Eu ropean coun t r ies have made la rge ly

w i thou t ou ts ide he lp .

Of cou rse the access ion coun t r ies a re fu l l y en t i t l ed to rece ive equa l t rea tmen t f rom the

va r ious f inanc ia l supp o r t p rog ram me s m anaged by the EU, and no th ing wr i t ten he re shou ld

cas t do ub t on tha t . Howeve r , they need to judg e rea l is t ica ll y the con t r ibu t ion such as s is t -

ance i s li ke ly to make tow ards the i r econo mic deve lopm en t . In the l i gh t o f th is assessme n t , i t

wou ld b e adv isab le fo r the EU 's f inanc ia l ass is tance to b e cu t ba ck in gene ra l , and fo r these

cons t ra in ts to app ly equal ly to ex is t ing and new me mb er s ta tes .

Konrad Lammers

Head o f the HWW A Department "European Integration"

I n t e re c o n o m i c s , S e p te m b e r /O c to b e r 2 0 0 2 2 31