19
Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution for Z: "#$% += ) + * , where m is electron mass, E1, E2 are energy of scattered electrons ) sin ) = * sin * where P 1 and P 2 are scattered electron momenta, and theta are their polar angle in lab ) cos * + * cos * = "#$% sin ) = 3 4 3 4 5 67 5 and cos ) = 7 3 4 5 67 5 It can be solved without neglecting electron mass: = + "#$% ) * /(2) 1

Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

  • Upload
    tranque

  • View
    217

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

CalibrationofHyCalandGEMZposition• Solvingthefollowingsystemofequations,foreachdoublearmMoller,wehaveananalyticsolutionforZ:• 𝐸"#$% + 𝑚 = 𝐸) + 𝐸*,wheremiselectronmass,E1,E2areenergyofscatteredelectrons• 𝑃) sin 𝜃) = 𝑃* sin 𝜃* whereP1 andP2 arescatteredelectronmomenta,andthetaaretheirpolarangleinlab• 𝑃) cos 𝜃* + 𝑃* cos 𝜃* = 𝑃"#$%• sin 𝜃) = 34

345675andcos 𝜃) = 7

345675

• Itcanbesolvedwithoutneglectingelectronmass:

𝑧 = 𝑚 + 𝐸"#$% 𝑅)𝑅*/(2𝑚)

1

Page 2: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

TestingtheFormula

• SimpleMCtogeneratedoublearmMollers basedonkinematics(onlyneedthescatteringangleofoneofthescatteredelectron)• EnergyofthescatteredMollerelectron,withoutneglectingelectronmass:

• 𝐸> =%×(@ABCD6EFG5 H @ABCD6% )IEFG5 H )

@ABCDIEFG5 H @ABCD6%()6EFG5 H )

• Usingconservationtogettheangleandenergyoftheotherelectron• Givenapredefinedzpositionofadetector,calculatetheradiiofthetwoelectrons• Plugbacktotheexpressionofzinthepreviouspagetocheckconsistency

2

Page 3: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

TestingtheFormula

plotEntries 10000

Mean 5127

RMS 0.000193

5000 5100 5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 60000

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000plot

Entries 10000

Mean 5127

RMS 0.000193

plot

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

200

400

600

800

1000

1200 ethetaEntries 10000Mean x 3.41Mean y 315.2RMS x 1.5RMS y 225.9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35etheta

Entries 10000Mean x 3.41Mean y 315.2RMS x 1.5RMS y 225.9

etheta

SimulatedMoller

Calculated zpositioncasedon thetworadiiandbeamenergy

Settingz=5127inthesimulation

Theta(deg)

E’(Mev)

Z(mm) 3

Page 4: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

plotEntries 10000Mean 5600RMS 0.0002024

5000 5100 5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 60000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

plotEntries 10000Mean 5600RMS 0.0002024

plot

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

200

400

600

800

1000

1200 ethetaEntries 10000Mean x 3.41Mean y 315.2RMS x 1.5RMS y 225.9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35etheta

Entries 10000Mean x 3.41Mean y 315.2RMS x 1.5RMS y 225.9

etheta

TestingtheFormula

SimulatedMollerCalculated zpositioncasedon thetworadiiandbeamenergy

Settingz=5600inthesimulation

Theta(deg)

E’(Mev)

Z(mm) 4

Page 5: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

AnalysisProcedure• UsingC12 run1345• AssumingGEM1,GEM2andHyCalpositionareat{5304,5264,5815}mm• MakesuretheoffsetisincludedforbothGEMsandHyCal• FirstselectingdoublearmMollerbasedonHyCalalone:

• |E1 – Eexpect| /Eexpect and|E1 – Eexpect| /Eexpect both lessthan4x0.026/sqrt(Eexpect)• |E1 +E2 – Ebeam| /Ebeam <4x0.026/sqrt(Ebeam)• ∆𝛗 <20deg• Scatteringangles>0.7deg• Twoclustersevents

• ProjectGEMhitstoHyCalsurfaceanddoamatchwithradius{20,30,40}mmfor{PWO,transition,LG}

• EachGEMhasitsowndoublearmMolleracceptance,usethosetocalculatezindependently(mustwithoutanyprojectionwhencalculatingz)• Reduce∆𝛗 cutto5deg whenusingGEMcoordinates,duetobetterresolution

5

Page 6: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

SelectingMollerEventsCandidatesUsingOnlyHyCal

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

eThetaEntries 490310Mean x 1.994Mean y 560.3RMS x 1.102RMS y 275.5

0

50

100

150

200

250

eThetaEntries 490310Mean x 1.994Mean y 560.3RMS x 1.102RMS y 275.5

eTheta

Theta(deg)

E’(MeV)

6

Page 7: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

DoubleArmMollers onEachGEM

-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600 hit_Pos_0Entries 38488Mean x -8.325Mean y 0.4398RMS x 26.49RMS y 215.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60hit_Pos_0

Entries 38488Mean x -8.325Mean y 0.4398RMS x 26.49RMS y 215.6

hit_Pos_0

-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600 hit_Pos_1Entries 39704Mean x 8.733Mean y 4.053RMS x 27.45RMS y 214.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60hit_Pos_1

Entries 39704Mean x 8.733Mean y 4.053RMS x 27.45RMS y 214.3

hit_Pos_1

GEM1 GEM2

(mm) (mm)

(mm) (mm)

Afterrequiring∆𝛗 <5deg

7

Page 8: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

DoubleChecktheOffsets

intersect_det_0_coor_1

Entries 9622Mean 0.1513RMS 14.18

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 500

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220 intersect_det_0_coor_1

Entries 9622Mean 0.1513RMS 14.18

intersect_det_0_coor_1intersect_det_0_coor_0

Entries 9622Mean 0.01454RMS 4.04

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 500

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600intersect_det_0_coor_0

Entries 9622Mean 0.01454RMS 4.04

intersect_det_0_coor_0

UsingtwostraightlinesdeterminedbyfourMollerscatteringelectronstodeterminethebeamspotposition,usingdatasetinthepreviouspage

GEM1 GEM1

(mm) (mm)

8

Page 9: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

DeterminetheZposition

zHist_0Entries 19244Mean 5219RMS 69.13

/ ndf 2χ 47.69 / 15Prob 2.849e-05Constant 14.8± 1350 Mean 0.3± 5222 Sigma 0.34± 32.55

4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 64000

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400zHist_0

Entries 19244Mean 5219RMS 69.13

/ ndf 2χ 47.69 / 15Prob 2.849e-05Constant 14.8± 1350 Mean 0.3± 5222 Sigma 0.34± 32.55

zHist_0

Survey result5304mm,Fitresult5222mm

GEM1

(mm) 9

Page 10: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

DeterminetheZposition

zHist_1Entries 19852Mean 5180RMS 67.2

/ ndf 2χ 92.92 / 17Prob 1.79e-12Constant 15.6± 1491 Mean 0.3± 5183 Sigma 0.26± 30.89

4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 64000

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600zHist_1

Entries 19852Mean 5180RMS 67.2

/ ndf 2χ 92.92 / 17Prob 1.79e-12Constant 15.6± 1491 Mean 0.3± 5183 Sigma 0.26± 30.89

zHist_1

Survey result5264mm,Fitresult5183mmDifferencebetween thetwoGEM:39mm

GEM2

(mm) 10

Page 11: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

DeterminetheZpositionzHist_2

Entries 245155Mean 5643RMS 135.8

/ ndf 2χ 64.4 / 42Prob 0.01467Constant 17.4± 5403 Mean 0.4± 5640 Sigma 0.6± 115

4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 64000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

zHist_2Entries 245155Mean 5643RMS 135.8

/ ndf 2χ 64.4 / 42Prob 0.01467Constant 17.4± 5403 Mean 0.4± 5640 Sigma 0.6± 115

zHist_2

(mm)

HyCal,Afterapplyingshowdepthcorrection

Survey result5815mm,Fitresult5640mm

11

Page 12: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

CheckingtheResult• Mollerscatteringhasaminimumopeningangleinlabframe,whichcorrespondtoscatteringangle=90deg incenterofmassframe• 𝑡𝑎𝑛* 𝜃N$" = *%

@ABCD6%• At1.1GeV,theminimumopeningangleis3.491 deg

• Inorderword,wearelookingforsymmetricMollers inthelabframe• Using|R1 – R2|<10mmtoselect symmetricMollers forbothHyCalandGEM• Duetostatistics,needtouseentireGEM,soprojectGEMtothesameplaneatz=5815mm

• Wecanagaincheckthe∆RvsRdistributiontosee ifeverythingmatches

12

Page 13: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

SymmetricMollerDistribution

-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600 sym_moller_posEntries 8668Mean x -0.07736Mean y -0.07177RMS x 119.2RMS y 123.3

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10sym_moller_posEntries 8668Mean x -0.07736Mean y -0.07177RMS x 119.2RMS y 123.3

sym_moller_pos

(mm)

(mm)

13

Page 14: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

MinimumOpeningAngle

open_angle_0Entries 4272Mean 3.432RMS 0.04266

/ ndf 2χ 44.29 / 15Prob 9.914e-05Constant 8.5± 378.3 Mean 0.000± 3.435 Sigma 0.00034± 0.01943

3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 40

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

open_angle_0Entries 4272Mean 3.432RMS 0.04266

/ ndf 2χ 44.29 / 15Prob 9.914e-05Constant 8.5± 378.3 Mean 0.000± 3.435 Sigma 0.00034± 0.01943

open_angle_0open_angle_2

Entries 5035Mean 3.383RMS 0.0702

/ ndf 2χ 27.1 / 38Prob 0.9059Constant 3.2± 157.8 Mean 0.001± 3.381 Sigma 0.00135± 0.06163

3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 40

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180open_angle_2

Entries 5035Mean 3.383RMS 0.0702

/ ndf 2χ 27.1 / 38Prob 0.9059Constant 3.2± 157.8 Mean 0.001± 3.381 Sigma 0.00135± 0.06163

open_angle_2

Fitresult:3.435degExpect:3.491deg

Fitresult:3.381degExpect:3.491deg

FromGEM FromHyCal

WiththeSurveysetting14

Page 15: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

RGEM - RHyCal vsRGEM

100 150 200 250 300 3501

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

Graph

(mm)

(mm)

WiththeSurveysetting 15

Page 16: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

open_angle_2Entries 5041Mean 3.486RMS 0.07507

/ ndf 2χ 42.02 / 37Prob 0.2625Constant 3.2± 153.1 Mean 0.001± 3.488 Sigma 0.00150± 0.06289

3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 40

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

open_angle_2Entries 5041Mean 3.486RMS 0.07507

/ ndf 2χ 42.02 / 37Prob 0.2625Constant 3.2± 153.1 Mean 0.001± 3.488 Sigma 0.00150± 0.06289

open_angle_2open_angle_0

Entries 4334Mean 3.486RMS 0.04533

/ ndf 2χ 20 / 13Prob 0.09513Constant 8.8± 389.6 Mean 0.000± 3.489 Sigma 0.00035± 0.01883

3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 40

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

open_angle_0Entries 4334Mean 3.486RMS 0.04533

/ ndf 2χ 20 / 13Prob 0.09513Constant 8.8± 389.6 Mean 0.000± 3.489 Sigma 0.00035± 0.01883

open_angle_0

MinimumOpeningAngle

Fitresult:3.489degExpect:3.491deg

FromGEM FromHyCal

WiththeNewsetting

Fitresult:3.488degExpect:3.491deg

16

Page 17: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

100 150 200 250 300 350

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

Graph

RGEM - RHyCal vsRGEM

(mm)

(mm)

WiththeNewsetting

Lessthan300umdifferenceinthemeanvalues

17

Page 18: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

slice_0Entries 103410Mean -0.04089RMS 3.096

/ ndf 2χ 1089 / 53Prob 0Constant 37.7± 9131 Mean 0.00932± -0.04747 Sigma 0.01± 2.98

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000slice_0

Entries 103410Mean -0.04089RMS 3.096

/ ndf 2χ 1089 / 53Prob 0Constant 37.7± 9131 Mean 0.00932± -0.04747 Sigma 0.01± 2.98

delta_R_vs_R

RGEM:80~120mm

mm

slice_1Entries 49406Mean 0.02703RMS 3.401

/ ndf 2χ 393.9 / 53Prob 0Constant 23.2± 3946 Mean 0.01493± 0.02475 Sigma 0.012± 3.304

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500 slice_1Entries 49406Mean 0.02703RMS 3.401

/ ndf 2χ 393.9 / 53Prob 0Constant 23.2± 3946 Mean 0.01493± 0.02475 Sigma 0.012± 3.304

delta_R_vs_R

mm

RGEM:120~160mm

slice_2Entries 34647Mean 0.00661RMS 3.788

/ ndf 2χ 375.4 / 49Prob 0Constant 17.7± 2485 Mean 0.019819± -0.003942 Sigma 0.017± 3.668

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

slice_2Entries 34647Mean 0.00661RMS 3.788

/ ndf 2χ 375.4 / 49Prob 0Constant 17.7± 2485 Mean 0.019819± -0.003942 Sigma 0.017± 3.668

delta_R_vs_R

RGEM:160~200mm

mm

slice_3Entries 32089Mean 0.02893RMS 4.322

/ ndf 2χ 196.5 / 54Prob 4.622e-18Constant 14.4± 2000 Mean 0.02375± 0.02597 Sigma 0.019± 4.241

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200 slice_3Entries 32089Mean 0.02893RMS 4.322

/ ndf 2χ 196.5 / 54Prob 4.622e-18Constant 14.4± 2000 Mean 0.02375± 0.02597 Sigma 0.019± 4.241

delta_R_vs_R

RGEM:200~240mm

mm18

Page 19: Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position · Calibration of HyCal and GEM Z position • Solving the following system of equations, for each double arm Moller, we have an analytic solution

slice_4Entries 32019Mean 0.08794RMS 4.835

/ ndf 2χ 176.5 / 55Prob 1.17e-14Constant 12.8± 1775 Mean 0.02676± 0.08223 Sigma 0.022± 4.772

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

slice_4Entries 32019Mean 0.08794RMS 4.835

/ ndf 2χ 176.5 / 55Prob 1.17e-14Constant 12.8± 1775 Mean 0.02676± 0.08223 Sigma 0.022± 4.772

delta_R_vs_R

RGEM:240~280mm

mm

slice_5Entries 33758Mean 0.2156RMS 5.401

/ ndf 2χ 158.1 / 57Prob 1.912e-11Constant 11.7± 1672 Mean 0.0292± 0.2123 Sigma 0.023± 5.345

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800slice_5

Entries 33758Mean 0.2156RMS 5.401

/ ndf 2χ 158.1 / 57Prob 1.912e-11Constant 11.7± 1672 Mean 0.0292± 0.2123 Sigma 0.023± 5.345

delta_R_vs_R

RGEM:280~320mm

mm

slice_6Entries 35399Mean 0.05385RMS 6.501

/ ndf 2χ 226 / 57Prob 5.471e-22Constant 10.3± 1504 Mean 0.0335± 0.2358 Sigma 0.027± 6.187

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

slice_6Entries 35399Mean 0.05385RMS 6.501

/ ndf 2χ 226 / 57Prob 5.471e-22Constant 10.3± 1504 Mean 0.0335± 0.2358 Sigma 0.027± 6.187

delta_R_vs_R

RGEM:320~360mm

mm 19