1
PARIS — Cries of “Merci!” and “Bravo!” erupted from the audi- ence on Friday night when Ben- jamin Millepied took a bow along with the dancers of the Paris Opera Ballet after a performance at the Palais Garnier. It was a closely watched mo- ment: Just a day earlier the opera had an- nounced that Mr. Millepied would be leaving as director of dance in July and be succeeded by Aurélie Dupont, a retired company étoile. (Not everyone agreed with the shout- outs: “Ridiculous!” a French audience member commented at intermission.) The program included the ballet’s premiere of a new work by Jérôme Bel and its first per- formance of Jerome Robbins’s “Goldberg Variations,” set to the Bach work. But it was the premiere of a piece choreographed by Mr. Millepied that the audience was waiting for. The work, “La Nuit S’Achève” (“The Night Ends”) is a sextet to Beethoven’s stormy Piano Sonata No. 23 in F minor, known as the “Appassionata” (played by Alain Planès); it shows Mr. Millepied’s trademark fluency and skill in its smoothly evolving transitions from com- plex ensemble interactions to pas de deux tender or tempestuous. The ballet presents three cou- ples (Amandine Albisson, Hervé Moreau; Sae Eun Park, Marc Moreau; Ida Viikinkovski, Jérémy-Loup Quer — all wonder- ful), who embody different emo- tional states in the course of romantic love. Ms. Albisson and Mr. Moreau emerge as the cen- tral storm-tossed pair; perhaps the others are memories of their past or possibilities for their future. (It was a pleasure to see Mr. Moreau, a beautifully refined dancer who has been much in- jured in recent years.) A sense of fugitive narrative emerges more powerfully in the second and third sections, (“An- dante con moto” and “Allegro ma non troppo — Presto”). Here, the dancers, wearing simple shifts, are mercifully freed from the harsh-toned red, blue and purple outfits (by Alessandro Sartori) of the opening section, “Allegro assai,” and Mr. Millepied calms the pace of the sometimes overdetailed ensemble choreography, using stillness as a counterpoint to pounding musical passages. Mr. Bel’s work also occasioned audience outbursts, with boos and bravos intermingling after his 30-minute piece, “Tombe,” in which three Paris Opera dancers (Grégory Gaillard, Sébastien Bertaud and Benjamin Pech) appeared on stage with a non- dancer outsider. Mr. Bel is a contentious figure, an intrepid tester of theatrical expectations who doesn’t actually create dance steps. His 2004 “Véronique Doisneau” for the Paris Opera Ballet was a brilliant exploration of a ballet dancer’s life. “Tombe,” which brings a supermarket cashier (Henda Traore), a woman with an ampu- tated leg (Sandra Escudé) and an elderly dance fan (Sylviane Mil- ley, via a projected film) succes- sively onstage, is less coherent. Mr. Bel raises some fascinating questions, among them, what is permissible, what are we repelled by, who enters the opera house? But no segment is fully devel- oped, and the rigorous theatrical timing that often makes a Bel piece gripping isn’t consistently in play. After all this came Robbins’s 100-minute “Goldberg Variations” (sensitively played by Simone Dinnerstein): it wasn’t a per- formance for the faint of heart. Both rigorous and playful, aca- demic and fanciful, it allowed the dancers to demonstrate the tech- nical precision and formal perfec- tion they are known for, as well as a newly buoyant musicality and spirit. The work showed the beautiful lines and finesse of the male soloists particularly well. Bravo to them, and to Myriam Ould-Brahm, dazzling among her excellent female peers. A Resignation, Then a Premiere: A Choreographer’s Charged Moment La Nuit S’Achève From complex interaction to tender pas de deux: Dancers in Benjamin Millepied’s work at the Palais Garnier in Paris. FRANCOIS GUILLOT/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE — GETTY IMAGES ROSLYN SULCAS DANCE REVIEW The Paris Opera Ballet’s program continues through Feb. 20 at the Palais Garnier in Paris; operadeparis.fr. C2 N THE NEW YORK TIMES, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2016 C M Y K Nxxx,2016-02-08,C,002,Bs-4C,E1 Many of Jérôme Kaplan’s designs are closely modeled on those of 1895, especially the swan-maidens, wearing small circular white caps on their hair from which low ponytails de- scend past their necks. The décor is only approximately medieval; I wish it more persua- sively evoked the age of chivalry. (Why are there Persian carpets on the ballroom walls?) But the color schemes are sensitive and handsome, and many crucial points accord perfectly with Mr. Ratmansky’s demonstration of the 1895 dance drama. Most obviously, there is no Black Swan ballerina. (That misbegotten title arrived only in the 1940s.) Odile’s dark dress contains several colors as well as black, and she attempts no swan imitations. (Viktorina Kapitonova, engagingly femi- nine, played the double role without any steeliness on Satur- day.) When she renews her se- duction of the prince, she does so by personal allure. Siegfried’s royal mother (Nora Dürig) does not domineer; she’s reasonable, indulgent, weaker than her son. And after Odette and Siegfried (Alexander Jones, intensely noble) end their lives, the ballet ends with an apotheosis in which they’re shown standing, transcendently, in a flying swan- carriage; but Odette, though dead, is free of her swan past and dressed as a woman. In dance terms, the produc- tion’s greatest but strangest achievement is to change our sense of Ivanov’s choreography of the lakeside scenes: an alter- ation more of style than of dance text. There’s no doom-laden grand manner. Principally, the swan-maiden characters are not tragically haunted by a bird form (as has become the stylistic norm, with mighty wing beats and arches throughout the arms and torso). Their sprightly first waltz suggests their pleasure both to be in human form and to be protected by the prince and his men. Subtler and more moving are the fresh nuances that Mr. Rat- mansky gives the final scene, whose Ivanov dances become the ballet’s poetic climax. The corps is shown as a loyal sorority, anxious for Odette, caught up with her fate, joining together. When Odette rejoins them, her vacillations of energy are ex- traordinary. In the very same phrase she’s ardent, then forlorn: impulsively spinning in the prince’s hands, then immediately wilting over his arm: It’s as if the stuffing had been knocked out of her. Along the way, fresh light keeps changing the ballet. A special triumph is the stage- filling celebratory group waltz for the opening scene: Mr. Rat- mansky brings Petipa’s forma- tions pulsating to life (20 couples, though the Mariinsky, with its vast resources, had more). De- tails — stools, baskets of flowers, a maypole but, above all, steps and patterns — become fragrant, musical, piquant. Old films show how, in the first lakeside scene, the prince’s friend Benno used to assist in partnering Odette, but this is the first production (in over 40 years of watching this classic) where I’ve seen this happen in perform- ance. Immediately it deepens the ballet’s portrait of chivalry: Odette never even sees Benno (Andrei Cozlac) — she accepts him simply as an extension of her prospective lover. And in the ballroom scene — for the first time in any production since the early 1940s — is the climactic moment when Siegfried kneels to Odile and she grips his knee as she holds a triumphant ara- besque. This production may be seen as a sequel to Mr. Ratmansky’s 2015 presentation of “The Sleep- ing Beauty” for American Ballet Theater. Like that, this is a co- production with Milan’s La Scala Ballet company (which dances it in June and July after it leaves the Zurich repertory on May 22), and is based in detail on a zeal- ous investigation of the first Mariinsky version and period style. Footwork, technique (in sequences of turns, the head often “spots” front rather than in the direction the pirouettes are traveling), lines and accentua- tion show many persuasively idiomatic nuances. There are, however, several seeming anachronisms. Satur- day’s two leading men, Mr. Jones and Mr. Cozlac, dressed in tights revealing the whole leg (very un-1895), were allowed some sequences of jumping, stretched bravura that looked at odds with the rest of the staging. (The original Benno was a non- dancing role.) A few other matters are ques- tionable. Ms. Kapitonova makes immediate eye contact with Siegfried, whereas evidence suggests that early Odettes avoided his gaze. A hitherto crucial dance phrase in Odette’s main solo, a pair of jumps that end with a famous stretch back into swan arabesque, is here replaced by a completely changed sequence. These mat- ters aren’t just for scholars; they directly affect audiences. On Saturday, Rossen Mi- lanov’s sensitive conducting of the Philharmonia Zürich brought fresh life to the score: Dance tempos were heart- eningly brisk. The theater seats about 1,000, and its intimate acoustics keenly enhance the music. The Zurich company is pleasing, able, harmonious; the dancers cope with the chal- lenges of period style with real grace. And what setting could be more felicitous for “Swan Lake” than the Zurich Opera House? This wonderful 1891 building stands beside Lake Zurich, which mountains surround and where swans swim. Beckoning to Those Radical Swans From 1895 From First Arts Page The Zurich Ballet, with Viktorina Kapitonova at center, performs “Swan Lake,” which recalls a historic rearrangement. CARLOS QUEZADA DOLLY FAIBYSHEV FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES Eva Edelstein, 12, joined the crowds at the Museum of Modern Art for the final weekend of its sprawling “Picasso Sculpture” exhibition, which was open until midnight on Saturday and Sunday. A Last-Minute Crush for Picasso at MoMA

C2 N - Virbmedia.virbcdn.com/files/dc/b2c991b7541da454-30185913A_1.pdf · text. There’s no doom-laden grand manner. Principally, the swan-maiden characters are not tragically haunted

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: C2 N - Virbmedia.virbcdn.com/files/dc/b2c991b7541da454-30185913A_1.pdf · text. There’s no doom-laden grand manner. Principally, the swan-maiden characters are not tragically haunted

PARIS — Cries of “Merci!” and“Bravo!” erupted from the audi-ence on Friday night when Ben-jamin Millepied took a bow alongwith the dancers of the Paris

Opera Ballet after aperformance at thePalais Garnier. It was aclosely watched mo-ment: Just a day earlierthe opera had an-nounced that Mr.

Millepied would be leaving asdirector of dance in July and besucceeded by Aurélie Dupont, aretired company étoile. (Noteveryone agreed with the shout-outs: “Ridiculous!” a Frenchaudience member commented atintermission.)

The program included theballet’s premiere of a new workby Jérôme Bel and its first per-formance of Jerome Robbins’s

“Goldberg Variations,” set to theBach work.

But it was the premiere of apiece choreographed by Mr.Millepied that the audience waswaiting for. The work, “La NuitS’Achève” (“The Night Ends”) isa sextet to Beethoven’s stormyPiano Sonata No. 23 in F minor,known as the “Appassionata”(played by Alain Planès); itshows Mr. Millepied’s trademarkfluency and skill in its smoothlyevolving transitions from com-plex ensemble interactions to pasde deux tender or tempestuous.

The ballet presents three cou-ples (Amandine Albisson, HervéMoreau; Sae Eun Park, MarcMoreau; Ida Viikinkovski,Jérémy-Loup Quer — all wonder-ful), who embody different emo-tional states in the course ofromantic love. Ms. Albisson andMr. Moreau emerge as the cen-tral storm-tossed pair; perhapsthe others are memories of theirpast or possibilities for theirfuture. (It was a pleasure to seeMr. Moreau, a beautifully refined

dancer who has been much in-jured in recent years.)

A sense of fugitive narrativeemerges more powerfully in the

second and third sections, (“An-dante con moto” and “Allegro manon troppo — Presto”). Here, thedancers, wearing simple shifts,

are mercifully freed from theharsh-toned red, blue and purpleoutfits (by Alessandro Sartori) ofthe opening section, “Allegroassai,” and Mr. Millepied calmsthe pace of the sometimesoverdetailed ensemblechoreography, using stillness as acounterpoint to pounding musicalpassages.

Mr. Bel’s work also occasionedaudience outbursts, with boosand bravos intermingling afterhis 30-minute piece, “Tombe,” inwhich three Paris Opera dancers(Grégory Gaillard, SébastienBertaud and Benjamin Pech)appeared on stage with a non-dancer outsider.

Mr. Bel is a contentious figure,an intrepid tester of theatricalexpectations who doesn’t actuallycreate dance steps. His 2004“Véronique Doisneau” for theParis Opera Ballet was a brilliantexploration of a ballet dancer’slife. “Tombe,” which brings asupermarket cashier (HendaTraore), a woman with an ampu-tated leg (Sandra Escudé) and an

elderly dance fan (Sylviane Mil-ley, via a projected film) succes-sively onstage, is less coherent.Mr. Bel raises some fascinatingquestions, among them, what ispermissible, what are we repelledby, who enters the opera house?But no segment is fully devel-oped, and the rigorous theatricaltiming that often makes a Belpiece gripping isn’t consistentlyin play.

After all this came Robbins’s100-minute “Goldberg Variations”(sensitively played by SimoneDinnerstein): it wasn’t a per-formance for the faint of heart.Both rigorous and playful, aca-demic and fanciful, it allowed thedancers to demonstrate the tech-nical precision and formal perfec-tion they are known for, as wellas a newly buoyant musicalityand spirit. The work showed thebeautiful lines and finesse of themale soloists particularly well.Bravo to them, and to MyriamOuld-Brahm, dazzling among herexcellent female peers.

A Resignation, Then a Premiere: A Choreographer’s Charged Moment

La Nuit S’Achève From complex interaction to tender pas de deux:Dancers in Benjamin Millepied’s work at the Palais Garnier in Paris.

FRANCOIS GUILLOT/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE — GETTY IMAGES

ROSLYNSULCASDANCE REVIEW

The Paris Opera Ballet’s programcontinues through Feb. 20 at thePalais Garnier in Paris;operadeparis.fr.

C2 N THE NEW YORK TIMES, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2016

C M Y K Nxxx,2016-02-08,C,002,Bs-4C,E1

Many of Jérôme Kaplan’sdesigns are closely modeled onthose of 1895, especially theswan-maidens, wearing smallcircular white caps on their hairfrom which low ponytails de-scend past their necks. Thedécor is only approximatelymedieval; I wish it more persua-sively evoked the age of chivalry.(Why are there Persian carpetson the ballroom walls?) But thecolor schemes are sensitive andhandsome, and many crucialpoints accord perfectly with Mr.Ratmansky’s demonstration ofthe 1895 dance drama.

Most obviously, there is noBlack Swan ballerina. (Thatmisbegotten title arrived only inthe 1940s.) Odile’s dark dresscontains several colors as well asblack, and she attempts no swanimitations. (ViktorinaKapitonova, engagingly femi-nine, played the double rolewithout any steeliness on Satur-day.) When she renews her se-duction of the prince, she does soby personal allure. Siegfried’sroyal mother (Nora Dürig) doesnot domineer; she’s reasonable,indulgent, weaker than her son.And after Odette and Siegfried(Alexander Jones, intenselynoble) end their lives, the balletends with an apotheosis in whichthey’re shown standing,transcendently, in a flying swan-carriage; but Odette, thoughdead, is free of her swan past anddressed as a woman.

In dance terms, the produc-tion’s greatest but strangestachievement is to change oursense of Ivanov’s choreographyof the lakeside scenes: an alter-ation more of style than of dancetext. There’s no doom-ladengrand manner. Principally, the

swan-maiden characters are nottragically haunted by a bird form(as has become the stylisticnorm, with mighty wing beatsand arches throughout the armsand torso). Their sprightly firstwaltz suggests their pleasureboth to be in human form and tobe protected by the prince andhis men.

Subtler and more moving arethe fresh nuances that Mr. Rat-mansky gives the final scene,whose Ivanov dances become theballet’s poetic climax. The corpsis shown as a loyal sorority,anxious for Odette, caught upwith her fate, joining together.

When Odette rejoins them, hervacillations of energy are ex-traordinary. In the very samephrase she’s ardent, then forlorn:impulsively spinning in theprince’s hands, then immediatelywilting over his arm: It’s as if thestuffing had been knocked out ofher.

Along the way, fresh lightkeeps changing the ballet. Aspecial triumph is the stage-filling celebratory group waltzfor the opening scene: Mr. Rat-mansky brings Petipa’s forma-tions pulsating to life (20 couples,though the Mariinsky, with itsvast resources, had more). De-

tails — stools, baskets of flowers,a maypole but, above all, stepsand patterns — become fragrant,musical, piquant.

Old films show how, in the firstlakeside scene, the prince’sfriend Benno used to assist inpartnering Odette, but this is thefirst production (in over 40 yearsof watching this classic) whereI’ve seen this happen in perform-ance. Immediately it deepens theballet’s portrait of chivalry:Odette never even sees Benno(Andrei Cozlac) — she acceptshim simply as an extension ofher prospective lover. And in theballroom scene — for the first

time in any production since theearly 1940s — is the climacticmoment when Siegfried kneels toOdile and she grips his knee asshe holds a triumphant ara-besque.

This production may be seenas a sequel to Mr. Ratmansky’s2015 presentation of “The Sleep-ing Beauty” for American BalletTheater. Like that, this is a co-production with Milan’s La ScalaBallet company (which dances itin June and July after it leavesthe Zurich repertory on May 22),and is based in detail on a zeal-ous investigation of the firstMariinsky version and period

style. Footwork, technique (insequences of turns, the headoften “spots” front rather than inthe direction the pirouettes aretraveling), lines and accentua-tion show many persuasivelyidiomatic nuances.

There are, however, severalseeming anachronisms. Satur-day’s two leading men, Mr.Jones and Mr. Cozlac, dressed intights revealing the whole leg(very un-1895), were allowedsome sequences of jumping,stretched bravura that looked atodds with the rest of the staging.(The original Benno was a non-dancing role.)

A few other matters are ques-tionable. Ms. Kapitonova makesimmediate eye contact withSiegfried, whereas evidencesuggests that early Odettesavoided his gaze. A hithertocrucial dance phrase in Odette’smain solo, a pair of jumps thatend with a famous stretch backinto swan arabesque, is herereplaced by a completelychanged sequence. These mat-ters aren’t just for scholars; theydirectly affect audiences.

On Saturday, Rossen Mi-lanov’s sensitive conducting ofthe Philharmonia Zürichbrought fresh life to the score:Dance tempos were heart-eningly brisk. The theater seatsabout 1,000, and its intimateacoustics keenly enhance themusic. The Zurich company ispleasing, able, harmonious; thedancers cope with the chal-lenges of period style with realgrace. And what setting could bemore felicitous for “Swan Lake”than the Zurich Opera House?This wonderful 1891 buildingstands beside Lake Zurich,which mountains surround andwhere swans swim.

Beckoning to Those Radical Swans From 1895From First Arts Page

The Zurich Ballet, with Viktorina Kapitonova at center, performs “Swan Lake,” which recalls a historic rearrangement.

CARLOS QUEZADA

DOLLY FAIBYSHEV FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES

Eva Edelstein, 12, joined the crowds at the Museum of Modern Art for the final weekend of its sprawling “Picasso Sculpture” exhibition, which was open until midnight on Saturday and Sunday.

A Last-Minute Crush for Picasso at MoMA