1
I t’s as if I were trying to hitch a ride from Puducherry to ancient Rome. No one wants to go to Arikamedu. Eventually, a rickshaw driver shows mercy by agree- ing to take me for 350. It’s twice the amount I paid 10 years ago but I accept his pricey offer, because I recall the archaeolog- ical site being a seven-kilometre drive from Puducherry, deep inside a jungle. The rickshaw crosses the bridge over Ari- yankuppam River, which is more of a la- goon, but the suburbs of Puducherry conti- nue to sprawl in a multi-storeyed, concrete landscape rather than giving way to the huts that I remember. As we turn off the Cudda- lore highway, the road meanders past Le Pa- radise Inn AC Bar — which I’m absolutely sure wasn’t there before. Women sell fresh catch squatting in the roadside dust and a narrow path between boxy houses leads to what’s left of the jungle. We bump on a dirt track through rubbish-strewn greenery, the occasional cactus stares back aggressively, until the discreetly green-painted Archaeo- logical Survey of India fence comes into sight. No information board welcomes me to Arikamedu. A handful of cud-chewing cows are the only other visitors. The fence protects a striking ruin with ve- ry Roman arches. But it’s actually the re- mains of a 250-year-old French mission, built around the time the first rudimentary excavation took place. French scientist Guil- laume Le Gentil observed that villagers were already busy recycling the ruins, which ex- plains why there’s no ancient town above ground. But looking closely at the mission’s walls, I notice two different types of bricks: one of a familiar size used even today, whilst others are atter, larger slabs. I let my fin- gers slide across their rugged surfaces. I feel I’ve seen similar at bricks at historical plac- es around the Mediterranean. It seems the mission was built with looted bricks. Romans and the romantics In the absence of signposting, the way to ex- plore the site is to follow a path that leads off from the ruin through the jungle and to- wards the river. Butteries are disturbed by my steps and utter up from the grass. Souls of Romans? Reborn as tropical insects? Ac- cording to excavation reports, somewhere underneath are the foundations of a 45- metre-long 1st century warehouse, sur- rounded by streets and drains and pits — the latter perhaps used for dyeing the fine mus- lin cloth that Tamil bards called ‘milky mist’. Archaeologists found imported Roman ta- bleware and wine amphorae shards suggest- ing that somebody who lived here had extra- vagant habits, but there were also traces of bead-manufacturing, signifying that the har- bour housed a mixed population of indige- nous artisans and foreign businessmen. The site runs half a kilometre along the river and reaches 200 metres inland at its widest, and it may harbour more secrets than archaeology has so far uncovered. In one clearing, myopic as I am, I come upon a meadow of bluish owers, which on closer inspection turns out to be mineral water pouches and the explanation for their pre- sence is in a nearby grove — empty whiskey bottles and discarded plastic cups. A roman- tically inclined couple scamper out of the undergrowth. I don’t know whether to apol- ogise for disturbing or take the uncle ap- proach and explain that historical places should be used for history purposes only. But in the end, I tell myself that if Romans drank wine here, then why shouldn’t a cer- tain romantic tradition continue? At the riverfront one may descend at one’s own risk by an old rope down the scarp. It’s dicier than expected and I tumble to the bottom of the steep embankment, which is basically a mud-caked at. As I crawl in the black goo, I’m amazed at the fact that nothing has been done to develop this as a tourist destination. Yet it directly links two of the greatest ancient civilisa- tions, the Indian and the Roman. As if to prove this, I spot pot shards in the mud and layers of bricks in an archaeological jigsaw puzzle laid bare by recent cyclones. This then is the quay that used to jut out into the river and from where, 2,000 years ago, In- dian spices, cloth, jewellery and other luxu- ry products were shipped to European markets. Unsolvable riddle Holding on to that thought and with my shoes slowly sinking in the mud, crabs run- ning amok whenever I move, I’m struck by how, without appropriate signage, this re- mains an unsolvable riddle for anybody who isn’t an expert. It’s not as if nobody has thought of doing something about it. One scholar, S. Suresh, discusses in his book Ari- kamedu: Its Place in the Ancient India-Rome Contacts a plan for a Tamil trail to highlight sites that in ancient days traded with the West. There has also been talk about an on- site interpretation centre. Years ago, a UN- ESCO World Heritage tag was proposed and Arikamedu is currently on a tentative list of ‘Silk Road Sites in India’. But nothing has happened and when someone built a mu- seum nearby, he was forced to shut it down because it’s illegal for private citizens to col- lect and display archaeological finds. Back in town, where the French left an oc- cidental esprit behind in 1954, I head for Rue Saint Louis where a merchant’s 18th century villa has been converted into the Pu- ducherry Museum. Unfortunately, there’s not much information available here either: when I ask the man at the ticket counter, who speaks a tiny bit of English, if I can buy a catalogue or an ASI excavation report, I’m given a free tourist brochure that deals most- ly with shopping in Puducherry. I enquire if there’s anybody, perhaps a curator or direc- tor, who knows anything about the Arikame- du objects, but he says no. The museum displays a whimsical collec- tion of European leftovers like rotting pia- nos and a pousse-pousse type of car from the 18th century powered by two natives who ran behind pushing it. There’s also a room housing Arikamedu discoveries in- cluding an informative display of beads cu- rated by a British archaeologist 35 years ago, making it a valuable museum piece in itself. Their minuscule size made beads the per- fect export product — fancy Arikamedu style microbeads have been found as far east as Vietnam and Bali. Wheeler’s discoveries Luckily, I’ve been doing some additional reading. Finds made by the French in the late 1930s suggested that Arikamedu might be a ville romaine that drew the attention of Mortimer Wheeler, Britain’s celeb archaeol- ogist who at that time headed the ASI. Wheeler excavated in 1945 and announced his discoveries with great enthusiasm: his report has many quotable if factually dicey statements such as the claim that Arikame- du ‘represents the site of a considerable bu- ried town on the Coromandel coast.’ No ‘considerable’ town has been unearthed, but Wheeler’s team catalogued scores of shards representing almost every imagina- ble kind of Mediterranean pottery. Regard- ing amphorae, it is possible to pinpoint not only the place of origin but even date of ex- port, as the styles changed with fashions. A normal-sized amphora held the equivalent of 36 of today’s bottles and considering that imported wine costs more than 1000 the value of each amphora (at a time when ship- ping was so much trickier) is easy to imagine. A coin-sized hole But I’m especially interested in inspecting the Arretine tableware that Wheeler identi- fied: a standardised high-quality pottery that was used throughout the Roman Em- pire from 1st century BCE to 300CE. I recall seeing, on a previous visit, a fragment stamped with the name of a prominent pot- ter based at Arezzo in Italy, suggesting that the plate was manufactured around 25CE. Since it belonged to a limited period product line it was significant for dating all the finds, prompting Wheeler to declare: ‘Upon the imported Mediterranean wares the whole chronology of the site, and its special impor- tance therefore to Indian archaeology, depend.’ I locate a handwritten label, ‘Italian Terra Sigillata Plate (imported from Roman Em- pire)’, but the holder is empty. Despite all the sari-clad museum guards keeping a sharp eye on tourists to ensure that nobody clicks a pic, somehow the treasure of the col- lection has disappeared. I’m in mortal shock. There’s also a display of Roman coins — of emperors Gallienus Antoninianus ( three pieces) and Tetricus Antoninianus (a single piece) – but the occasional empty coin-sized hole suggests that things have gone missing here as well. There’s still enough evidence left for us to buy the idea that Roman inuence was pre- sent. However, along with his path-breaking discoveries, Wheeler spread an inated nar- rative of Arikamedu being a full-edged Ro- man port. Later archaeologists, such as Vi- mala Begley who excavated comprehensively in 1989-92, disagreed with him. According to Begley’s findings, Arika- medu was inhabited and had lapidary indus- try as well as pottery production long before any foreigner set foot here — which is prob- ably why Romans came in the first place to trade wine and fine-quality plates. The rich bead finds suggest an indigenous export- oriented business that perhaps started as early as the 3rd century BCE; that is, at a time when Rome was an expanding city state but not yet a vast empire. FINDING AN AMPHORA IN ARIKAMEDU An archaeological site near Puducherry holds the key to India’s ancient relationships with the rest of the world. That is, if you can find the place first BY ZAC O’YEAH COVER STORY < > As I crawl in the black goo, I’m amazed that nothing has been done to develop this as a tourist destination < > Their minuscule size made beads the perfect export product — fancy Arikamedu style microbeads have been found as far as Bali Hidden world (Clockwise from left) The ruins of striking Roman arches at Arikamedu; and fishing boats along Ariyankuppam river. S.S. Kumar & Zac O’Yeah Scholars therefore postulate that the excitement over a Roman port in India may be exaggerated. Ra- jan Gurukkal argues in his paper Classical Indo-Roman Trade: A Misnomer in Political Economy that the ‘history of India’s mari- time contact with Rome, generally described as Indo-Roman trade, has been a prominent theme of discussion in her historiography, exciting several historians with the imaginary notion of a mari- time civilisation…’ His conclusion is that it should, rather than ‘trade’, be called ‘Roman-Indian exchange, an exchange of serious imbalance, because of its being between an Empire and a region of uneven chiefdoms’. Himanshu Prabha Ray, author of The Archae- ology of Seafaring in Ancient South Asia, who was personally present during the excavations helmed by Begley, elaborates that a ‘myth debunked by the recent excavations is the identification of the site as an Indo-Roman trading station… More significantly, the archaeological record confirmed that Arikamedu occupied a nodal position in the inland, coastal and transoceanic networks.’ Yakshi in Italy The alternative conclusion may then be that Arikamedu was es- sentially one of India’s early inter- national ports, making local elites so wealthy that they could enjoy the occasional amphora of wine, build the temples that Tamil Nadu is famous for, and patronise San- gam poetry. The references to In- do-Roman affairs in ancient Tamil poems prove the existence but not necessarily permanence of alien settlements, and certainly do not disprove the agency of Indian traders. In some recent texts, ironically, more importance is given to In- dians in the Roman empire, which tilts the entire affair in the oppo- site direction, despite there being only fragmentary evidence for Ta- mil merchant settlements in Egypt — though this paucity could be due to the perishability of Indian goods: spices, textiles. One of the rare Indian objects discovered within the Roman Empire, signifi- cantly enough in a merchant’s house, is an ‘ivory statuette found in the Roman town of Pompeii, which was buried in lava’ as noted by Partha Mitter in his Indian Art, which means that this sculpture — some experts suggest it is Lakshmi and others that it’s a Yakshi — would have reached Italy before the volcano’s eruption in 79CE. Might it have come from Arikame- du? It’s an archaeological fact that wines produced in the Neapolitan region found their way here. Soma and an olive Drinking in the sight of the am- phorae shards, I can’t help but wonder what wine meant to an- cient Tamilians. Some scholars ar- gue that imported wine was for the consumption of Romans set- tled here, yet Tamil poets eulo- gised ‘cool and fragrant wine’ that was guzzled from golden pitchers ‘that have been fashioned with high artistry’ such as mentioned in the 56th poem of the Purana- nuru. Sanskrit texts mention that each Indian village had a tavern, while cities had entire quarters re- served for bar-hopping. Jeannine Auboyer, in Daily Life in Ancient India, provides a vivid description of ‘rooms filled with seats and couches, and also counters where perfumes, owers and garlands could be bought. It was a lucrative business, for the sale of fermented and alcoholic drinks continued throughout the day and well into the night.’ But the bar at my heritage hotel offers a mocktail named ‘Arikame- du’ — a mix of mango, cranberry and lime juices — which feels off, considering what heady beverag- es the place seems to have served up in ancient days. If one were to name a cocktail ‘Arikamedu’, it ought to contain a splash of Medi- terranean wine, lashings of soma (can be substituted with beer), and an olive. On my last morning in town, I decide to see what the mouth of the Ariyankuppam River, which the Romans sailed up, looks like. I presume I’ll find it if I walk south for as long as the beach stretches, so I head down the seaside prome- nade. Where Goubert Avenue ends, the beach continues past a popular bar called Seagulls to the old French pier which is off-limits for tourists. Sea of bottles Behind the pier, black boulders have been stacked to stop erosion. I climb up the rocks and stumble upon a narrow street in front of huts belonging to fisherfolk — men are mending nets, women dry fish on the asphalt surface. I cross a stretch of sand to a makeshift tar- paulin camp from where a kuc- cha road leads further. After another kilometre I see fishing boats moored in a creek. There’s a hillock I climb for a bet- ter view of the Ariyankuppam, only to bump into a defecating gentleman. A sewage pipe vomits out a dark waterfall into the river, as if all the puke of Puducherry’s winter party season is chan- nelled this way. A wading fisherman throws his net out again and again. Occa- sionally the tempestuous sea reaches his neck and I worry for his safety. Nearby, three men on a motorboat trawl the inlet, shrieking ‘yahoo!’ I climb down to where the Ariyankuppam and the ocean meet and some youths are finishing a pre-lunch whisky bottle while filming themselves dancing surrounded by hun- dreds of beer empties — which makes me wonder what future archaeologists will think if they dig here? The sea of bottles is a curious analogy to the amphorae shards just about a thousand metres upriver, but on the other side. The other side of history, one might add. But with a little sign- posting Arikamedu might deve- lop into a centre for understand- ing India’s ancient relationships with the rest of the world — from Europe to the Far East, for the Arikamedu site was obviously close to the heart of it all. The author is fascinated with places where tourists don’t go, especially if there’s something to eat that he hasn’t tried before. Finding an amphora in Arikamedu < > Drinking in the sight of amphorae shards, I can’t help but wonder what wine meant to ancient Tamilians Ancient find (Clockwise from above) The road leading to Arikamedu; stones of different colours excavated at Arikamedu on display at Puducherry museum; some of the excavated idols. Zac O’Yeah & T. Singaravelou

C OVER STORY FINDING AN AMPHORA IN ARIKAMEDU

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

It’s as if I were trying to hitch a ride fromPuducherry to ancient Rome. No onewants to go to Arikamedu. Eventually, arickshaw driver shows mercy by agree-

ing to take me for ₹��350. It’s twice theamount I paid 10 years ago but I accept hispricey off��er, because I recall the archaeolog-ical site being a seven-kilometre drive fromPuducherry, deep inside a jungle.

The rickshaw crosses the bridge over Ari-yankuppam River, which is more of a la-goon, but the suburbs of Puducherry conti-nue to sprawl in a multi-storeyed, concretelandscape rather than giving way to the hutsthat I remember. As we turn off�� the Cudda-lore highway, the road meanders past Le Pa-radise Inn AC Bar — which I’m absolutelysure wasn’t there before. Women sell freshcatch squatting in the roadside dust and anarrow path between boxy houses leads towhat’s left of the jungle. We bump on a dirttrack through rubbish-strewn greenery, theoccasional cactus stares back aggressively,until the discreetly green-painted Archaeo-logical Survey of India fence comes intosight. No information board welcomes me toArikamedu. A handful of cud-chewing cowsare the only other visitors.

The fence protects a striking ruin with ve-ry Roman arches. But it’s actually the re-mains of a 250-year-old French mission,built around the time the fi��rst rudimentaryexcavation took place. French scientist Guil-laume Le Gentil observed that villagers werealready busy recycling the ruins, which ex-plains why there’s no ancient town aboveground. But looking closely at the mission’swalls, I notice two diff��erent types of bricks:one of a familiar size used even today, whilstothers are fl��atter, larger slabs. I let my fi��n-gers slide across their rugged surfaces. I feelI’ve seen similar fl��at bricks at historical plac-es around the Mediterranean. It seems themission was built with looted bricks.

Romans and the romanticsIn the absence of signposting, the way to ex-plore the site is to follow a path that leads off��from the ruin through the jungle and to-wards the river. Butterfl��ies are disturbed bymy steps and fl��utter up from the grass. Soulsof Romans? Reborn as tropical insects? Ac-cording to excavation reports, somewhereunderneath are the foundations of a 45-metre-long 1st century warehouse, sur-rounded by streets and drains and pits — thelatter perhaps used for dyeing the fi��ne mus-lin cloth that Tamil bards called ‘milky mist’.Archaeologists found imported Roman ta-bleware and wine amphorae shards suggest-ing that somebody who lived here had extra-vagant habits, but there were also traces ofbead-manufacturing, signifying that the har-bour housed a mixed population of indige-nous artisans and foreign businessmen.

The site runs half a kilometre along theriver and reaches 200 metres inland at itswidest, and it may harbour more secretsthan archaeology has so far uncovered. In

one clearing, myopic as I am, I come upon ameadow of bluish fl��owers, which on closerinspection turns out to be mineral waterpouches and the explanation for their pre-sence is in a nearby grove — empty whiskeybottles and discarded plastic cups. A roman-tically inclined couple scamper out of theundergrowth. I don’t know whether to apol-ogise for disturbing or take the uncle ap-proach and explain that historical placesshould be used for history purposes only.But in the end, I tell myself that if Romansdrank wine here, then why shouldn’t a cer-tain romantic tradition continue?

At the riverfront one may descend atone’s own risk by an old rope down thescarp. It’s dicier than expected and I tumbleto the bottom of the steep embankment,which is basically a mud-caked fl��at. As Icrawl in the black goo, I’m amazed at thefact that nothing has been done to developthis as a tourist destination. Yet it directlylinks two of the greatest ancient civilisa-tions, the Indian and the Roman. As if toprove this, I spot pot shards in the mud andlayers of bricks in an archaeological jigsawpuzzle laid bare by recent cyclones. This

then is the quay that used to jut out into theriver and from where, 2,000 years ago, In-dian spices, cloth, jewellery and other luxu-ry products were shipped to Europeanmarkets.

Unsolvable riddleHolding on to that thought and with myshoes slowly sinking in the mud, crabs run-ning amok whenever I move, I’m struck byhow, without appropriate signage, this re-mains an unsolvable riddle for anybody whoisn’t an expert. It’s not as if nobody hasthought of doing something about it. Onescholar, S. Suresh, discusses in his book Ari-kamedu: Its Place in the Ancient India-RomeContacts a plan for a Tamil trail to highlightsites that in ancient days traded with theWest. There has also been talk about an on-site interpretation centre. Years ago, a UN-ESCO World Heritage tag was proposed andArikamedu is currently on a tentative list of‘Silk Road Sites in India’. But nothing hashappened and when someone built a mu-seum nearby, he was forced to shut it downbecause it’s illegal for private citizens to col-lect and display archaeological fi��nds.

Back in town, where the French left an oc-cidental esprit behind in 1954, I head forRue Saint Louis where a merchant’s 18thcentury villa has been converted into the Pu-ducherry Museum. Unfortunately, there’snot much information available here either:when I ask the man at the ticket counter,who speaks a tiny bit of English, if I can buya catalogue or an ASI excavation report, I’m

given a free tourist brochure that deals most-ly with shopping in Puducherry. I enquire ifthere’s anybody, perhaps a curator or direc-tor, who knows anything about the Arikame-du objects, but he says no.

The museum displays a whimsical collec-tion of European leftovers like rotting pia-nos and a pousse-pousse type of car fromthe 18th century powered by two nativeswho ran behind pushing it. There’s also aroom housing Arikamedu discoveries in-cluding an informative display of beads cu-rated by a British archaeologist 35 years ago,making it a valuable museum piece in itself.Their minuscule size made beads the per-fect export product — fancy Arikamedu stylemicrobeads have been found as far east asVietnam and Bali.

Wheeler’s discoveriesLuckily, I’ve been doing some additionalreading. Finds made by the French in thelate 1930s suggested that Arikamedu mightbe a ville romaine that drew the attention ofMortimer Wheeler, Britain’s celeb archaeol-ogist who at that time headed the ASI.Wheeler excavated in 1945 and announcedhis discoveries with great enthusiasm: hisreport has many quotable if factually diceystatements such as the claim that Arikame-du ‘represents the site of a considerable bu-ried town on the Coromandel coast.’ No‘considerable’ town has been unearthed,but Wheeler’s team catalogued scores ofshards representing almost every imagina-ble kind of Mediterranean pottery. Regard-

ing amphorae, it is possible to pinpoint notonly the place of origin but even date of ex-port, as the styles changed with fashions. Anormal-sized amphora held the equivalentof 36 of today’s bottles and considering thatimported wine costs more than ₹��1000 thevalue of each amphora (at a time when ship-ping was so much trickier) is easy toimagine.

A coin-sized holeBut I’m especially interested in inspectingthe Arretine tableware that Wheeler identi-fi��ed: a standardised high-quality potterythat was used throughout the Roman Em-pire from 1st century BCE to 300CE. I recallseeing, on a previous visit, a fragmentstamped with the name of a prominent pot-ter based at Arezzo in Italy, suggesting thatthe plate was manufactured around 25CE.Since it belonged to a limited period productline it was signifi��cant for dating all the fi��nds,prompting Wheeler to declare: ‘Upon theimported Mediterranean wares the wholechronology of the site, and its special impor-tance therefore to Indian archaeology,depend.’

I locate a handwritten label, ‘Italian TerraSigillata Plate (imported from Roman Em-pire)’, but the holder is empty. Despite allthe sari-clad museum guards keeping asharp eye on tourists to ensure that nobodyclicks a pic, somehow the treasure of the col-lection has disappeared. I’m in mortalshock. There’s also a display of Roman coins— of emperors Gallienus Antoninianus (three pieces) and Tetricus Antoninianus (asingle piece) – but the occasional emptycoin-sized hole suggests that things havegone missing here as well.

There’s still enough evidence left for us tobuy the idea that Roman infl��uence was pre-sent. However, along with his path-breakingdiscoveries, Wheeler spread an infl��ated nar-rative of Arikamedu being a full-fl��edged Ro-man port. Later archaeologists, such as Vi-mala Begley who excavatedcomprehensively in 1989-92, disagreed withhim. According to Begley’s fi��ndings, Arika-medu was inhabited and had lapidary indus-try as well as pottery production long beforeany foreigner set foot here — which is prob-ably why Romans came in the fi��rst place totrade wine and fi��ne-quality plates. The richbead fi��nds suggest an indigenous export-oriented business that perhaps started asearly as the 3rd century BCE; that is, at atime when Rome was an expanding citystate but not yet a vast empire.

FINDING AN AMPHORA IN

ARIKAMEDUAn archaeological site near Puducherry holds the key to India’s ancient relationships

with the rest of the world. That is, if you can fi��nd the place fi��rst

BY ZAC O’YEAH

COVER STORY

<>As I crawl in the blackgoo, I’m amazed thatnothing has been doneto develop this as atourist destination

<>Their minuscule sizemade beads the perfectexport product — fancyArikamedu stylemicrobeads have beenfound as far as Bali

Hidden world (Clockwise from left) The ruins ofstriking Roman arches at Arikamedu; and fi��shing boatsalong Ariyankuppam river. S.S. Kumar & Zac O’Yeah

Scholars therefore postulate thatthe excitement over a Roman portin India may be exaggerated. Ra-jan Gurukkal argues in his paperClassical Indo-Roman Trade: AMisnomer in Political Economythat the ‘history of India’s mari-time contact with Rome, generallydescribed as Indo-Roman trade,has been a prominent theme ofdiscussion in her historiography,exciting several historians withthe imaginary notion of a mari-time civilisation…’ His conclusionis that it should, rather than‘trade’, be called ‘Roman-Indianexchange, an exchange of seriousimbalance, because of its beingbetween an Empire and a regionof uneven chiefdoms’. HimanshuPrabha Ray, author of The Archae-ology of Seafaring in AncientSouth Asia, who was personallypresent during the excavationshelmed by Begley, elaborates thata ‘myth debunked by the recentexcavations is the identifi��cation ofthe site as an Indo-Roman tradingstation… More signifi��cantly, thearchaeological record confi��rmedthat Arikamedu occupied a nodalposition in the inland, coastal andtransoceanic networks.’

Yakshi in ItalyThe alternative conclusion maythen be that Arikamedu was es-sentially one of India’s early inter-national ports, making local elitesso wealthy that they could enjoythe occasional amphora of wine,build the temples that Tamil Naduis famous for, and patronise San-gam poetry. The references to In-do-Roman aff��airs in ancient Tamilpoems prove the existence but notnecessarily permanence of aliensettlements, and certainly do not

disprove the agency of Indiantraders.

In some recent texts, ironically,more importance is given to In-dians in the Roman empire, whichtilts the entire aff��air in the oppo-site direction, despite there beingonly fragmentary evidence for Ta-mil merchant settlements in Egypt— though this paucity could bedue to the perishability of Indiangoods: spices, textiles. One of therare Indian objects discoveredwithin the Roman Empire, signifi��-cantly enough in a merchant’shouse, is an ‘ivory statuette foundin the Roman town of Pompeii,which was buried in lava’ as notedby Partha Mitter in his Indian Art,which means that this sculpture —some experts suggest it is Lakshmiand others that it’s a Yakshi —would have reached Italy beforethe volcano’s eruption in 79CE.Might it have come from Arikame-du? It’s an archaeological fact thatwines produced in the Neapolitanregion found their way here.

Soma and an oliveDrinking in the sight of the am-phorae shards, I can’t help butwonder what wine meant to an-cient Tamilians. Some scholars ar-gue that imported wine was forthe consumption of Romans set-tled here, yet Tamil poets eulo-gised ‘cool and fragrant wine’ thatwas guzzled from golden pitchers‘that have been fashioned withhigh artistry’ such as mentionedin the 56th poem of the Purana-nuru. Sanskrit texts mention thateach Indian village had a tavern,while cities had entire quarters re-served for bar-hopping. JeannineAuboyer, in Daily Life in AncientIndia, provides a vivid descriptionof ‘rooms fi��lled with seats andcouches, and also counters where

perfumes, fl��owers and garlandscould be bought. It was a lucrativebusiness, for the sale of fermentedand alcoholic drinks continuedthroughout the day and well intothe night.’

But the bar at my heritage hoteloff��ers a mocktail named ‘Arikame-du’ — a mix of mango, cranberryand lime juices — which feels off��,considering what heady beverag-es the place seems to have servedup in ancient days. If one were toname a cocktail ‘Arikamedu’, it

ought to contain a splash of Medi-terranean wine, lashings of soma(can be substituted with beer),and an olive.

On my last morning in town, Idecide to see what the mouth ofthe Ariyankuppam River, whichthe Romans sailed up, looks like. Ipresume I’ll fi��nd it if I walk southfor as long as the beach stretches,so I head down the seaside prome-nade. Where Goubert Avenueends, the beach continues past apopular bar called Seagulls to theold French pier which is off��-limitsfor tourists.

Sea of bottlesBehind the pier, black bouldershave been stacked to stop erosion.I climb up the rocks and stumbleupon a narrow street in front ofhuts belonging to fi��sherfolk — menare mending nets, women dry fi��shon the asphalt surface. I cross astretch of sand to a makeshift tar-

paulin camp from where a kuc-cha road leads further.

After another kilometre I seefi��shing boats moored in a creek.There’s a hillock I climb for a bet-ter view of the Ariyankuppam,only to bump into a defecatinggentleman. A sewage pipe vomitsout a dark waterfall into the river,as if all the puke of Puducherry’swinter party season is chan-nelled this way.

A wading fi��sherman throws his

net out again and again. Occa-sionally the tempestuous seareaches his neck and I worry forhis safety. Nearby, three men ona motorboat trawl the inlet,shrieking ‘yahoo!’ I climb downto where the Ariyankuppam andthe ocean meet and some youthsare fi��nishing a pre-lunch whiskybottle while fi��lming themselvesdancing surrounded by hun-dreds of beer empties — whichmakes me wonder what future

archaeologists will think if theydig here?

The sea of bottles is a curiousanalogy to the amphorae shardsjust about a thousand metresupriver, but on the other side.

The other side of history, onemight add. But with a little sign-posting Arikamedu might deve-lop into a centre for understand-ing India’s ancient relationshipswith the rest of the world — fromEurope to the Far East, for theArikamedu site was obviouslyclose to the heart of it all.

The author is fascinated with placeswhere tourists don’t go, especially ifthere’s something to eat that hehasn’t tried before.

Finding an amphora in Arikamedu

<>Drinking in thesight of amphoraeshards, I can’t helpbut wonder whatwine meant toancient Tamilians

Ancient fi��nd (Clockwise fromabove) The road leading toArikamedu; stones of diff��erentcolours excavated at Arikameduon display at Puducherrymuseum; some of the excavatedidols. Zac O’Yeah & T. Singaravelou