Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jurisdiction –
Challenge it!!!
©Common Law Copyright 2019
by Sovereignty International (a trust)
C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437
Fort Worth, Texas
ZIP CODE EXEMPT
[email protected] [email protected]
www.sovereigntyinternational.fyi
Disclaimers
I am NOT a liar (lawyer)
You should NEVER take my word for anything
You should always do your own research
I have provided references to aid you in your research
I don’t know everything and am open to any ideas
©Common Law Copyright 2019 2
©Common Law Copyright 2019 3
©Common Law Copyright 2019 4
©Common Law Copyright 2019 5
©Common Law Copyright 2019 6
©Common Law Copyright 2019 7
CSPOA.ORG
Jurisdiction
"Where a court failed to observe
safeguards, it amounts to denial
of due process of law, court is
deprived of juris." Merritt v. Hunter,
C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "Not every action by any judge is in
exercise of his judicial function. It is not a
judicial function for a Judge to commit an
intentional tort even though the tort occurs
in the Courthouse, when a judge acts as a
Trespasser of the Law, when a judge does
not follow the law, the judge loses subject
matter jurisdiction and The Judge's orders
are void, of no legal force or effect"! Yates
Vs. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209
F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction
When they deny due process they
lose subject matter jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction can be
challenged at any time, even on
appeal
Once jurisdiction is challenged
everything stops until jurisdiction is
proven
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction
"Defense of lack of jurisdiction
over the subject matter may be
raised at any time, even on
appeal." Hill Top Developers v.
Holiday Pines Service Corp. 478 So.
2D, 368 Fla a DCA 1985)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "Jurisdiction can be challenged at
any time," and "Jurisdiction, once
challenged, cannot be assumed
and must be decided." Basso v.
Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d
906, 910”
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "Once challenged, jurisdiction
cannot be assumed, it must be
proved to exist." Stuck v.
Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751.
211 P2d 289”
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction
©Common Law Copyright 2019
"...[H]owever late this objection [to
jurisdiction] has been made, or may be
made in any cause, in an inferior or
appellate court of the United States, it must
be considered and decided, BEFORE any
court can move ONE FURTHER STEP IN
THE CAUSE; as any movement is
necessarily the exercise of jurisdiction."
RHODE ISLAND MASSACHUSETTS, 37 U.S.
657, 718, 9 L.Ed. 1233 (1838).
Jurisdiction "Where jurisdiction is contested, the
burden of establishing it rests upon the
plaintiff." Loos v American Energy Savers,
Inc., 168 I11.App.3d 558, 522 N.E.2d
841(1988)
"the burden of proving jurisdiction rests
upon the party asserting it." Binde11 v City
0f Harvey, 212 I11.App.3d 1042, 571 N.E.2d
1017(1st Dist. 1991)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction The Judge cannot decide jurisdiction
The burden is on the prosecutor to
prove jurisdiction
The Court cannot give itself
jurisdiction
Proceeding without jurisdiction is
NOT something that is considered
discretionary ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "a universal principle as old as
the law is that a proceedings of
a court without jurisdiction are
a nullity and its judgment
therein without effect either on
person or property,” Norwood v.
Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte
Giambonini, 49 P. 732
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction • "A departure by a court from those
recognized and established
requirements of law however close
apparent adherence to mere form in
methods of procedure which has the
effect of depriving one of a
constitutional right, is an excess of
jurisdiction.” Wuest v. Wuest, 127 P2d
934, 937.
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction
"The burden shifts to the
court to prove
jurisdiction." Rosemond v.
Lambert, 469 F 2d 416
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "A court has no jurisdiction to
determine its own jurisdiction, for a
basic issue in any case before a
tribunal is its power to act, and a court
must have the authority to decide that
question the first instance.“ Rescue
Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles,
171 P2d 8: 331 US 549, 91 K, ed, 1666m
67 S, Ct, 1409
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "A court cannot confer jurisdiction
where none existed and cannot
make a void proceeding valid. It is
clear and well established law that
a void order can be challenged in
any court", OLD WAYNE MUT. L.
ASSOC. v. McDONOUGH, 204 U. S.
8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no
jurisdiction of the subject matter on which
it assumes to act, its proceedings are
absolutely void in the fullest sense of the
term." Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27
“Judge loses his absolute immunity from
damage actions only when he acts in clear
absence of all jurisdiction or performance
of an act which is not judicial in nature.”
Schucker v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "There is no discretion to
ignore that lack of
jurisdiction." Joyce v. US,
474 F2d 215
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction "The law requires proof of jurisdiction to
appear on the record of the administrative
agency and all administrative
proceedings." Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. S.
538 (1974)
"Where there is no jurisdiction there is no
judge; the proceeding is as nothing. Such
has been the law from the days of the
Marshalsea, 10 Coke 68; also Bradley v.
Fisher, 13 Wall 335,351." Manning v.
Ketcham, 58 F.2d 948.
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction “In arriving at our decision in this matter we
do not depart in any way from our holding in
Huendling v. Jensen [*300] that the doctrine
of judicial immunity extends to courts of
limited jurisdiction. But, when a minor
magistrate acts wholly without jurisdiction,
civil liability attaches for his malicious and
corrupt abuse of process and his willful and
malicious oppression of any person under
the pretense of acting in his official capacity.
See Huendling v. Jensen, 168 N.W.2d, at 749
and authorities cited.”188 N.W.2d 294; 1971
Iowa Sup. LEXIS 863; 64 A.L.R.3d 1242 ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction
Lack of Jurisdiction = Void Judgment
Proceeding without jurisdiction is a malicious prosecution
See the Void Judgments video
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Jurisdiction
If they tell you they have jurisdiction without proving jurisdiction, it is a War Crime
“So we are doing War Crimes here today, are we?”
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 1
“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest. The presence of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law.” Article 1, Lieber Code [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 2
“Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation, ordered by the commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war, when the occupation of a place or territory continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the conditions of the same.” Article 2, Lieber Code [emphasis added] ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Martial Law All civil war states are under a military
occupation – Virginia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas,
Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky
All of the states in the territory conquered in
the War with Mexico are under a military
occupation, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah,
Nevada
Dictation = Dictatorship – Military Dictatorship
Law Enforcement = Enforcing the Martial Law ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Martial Law
When the southern states walked out of Congress in 1861 they ceased to have a quorum
Under executive authority (Martial Law) Lincoln ordered Congress to re-convene
When The Supreme Court ruled against something Lincoln did, he ordered troops to the Supreme court
“All process of this Court issues in the name of the President of the United States.” Rule 45. Process; Mandates
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Martial Law All Statutes (state or federal) passed prior to 1861 are
lawful de jure statutes
All statutes (state or federal) passed after 1861 are Martial Law Statutes
“Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 1901.
In 1871 Congress set up a corporation to operate as the government of the District of Columbia
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Excited Domestic Insurrections
©Common Law Copyright 2019 34
Bankruptcy = Martial Law "It is an established fact that the United States
Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent, H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.” United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Bankruptcy = Martial Law "Since March 9, 1933; the United States has been in a state of
declared National Emergency . . . Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens. . . . A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency . . .“ In Reg: U.S. Senate Report No. 93-549 dated 11/19/73 (73 CIS Serial Set S963-2 - [607 Pages])
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 37
Military Dictatorship • “Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the
suspension, by the occupying military authority,
of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic
administration and government in the occupied
place or territory, and in the substitution of
military rule and force for the same, as well as in
the dictation of general laws, as far as military
necessity requires this suspension, substitution,
or dictation.
• The commander of the forces may proclaim that
the administration of all civil and penal law shall
continue either wholly or in part, as in times of
peace, unless otherwise ordered by the military authority.” Article 3, Lieber Code
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Dictatorship • “Military necessity, as understood by modern
civilized nations, consists in the necessity of those
measures which are indispensable for securing the
ends of the war, and which are lawful according to the
modern law and usages of war.” Article 14, Lieber Code
• “Military necessity does not admit of cruelty - that is,
the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering or
for revenge, nor of maiming or wounding except in
fight, nor of torture to extort confessions. It does not
admit of the use of poison in any way, nor of the
wanton devastation of a district. It admits of
deception, but disclaims acts of perfidy; and, in
general, military necessity does not include any act of
hostility which makes the return to peace
unnecessarily difficult.” Article 16, Lieber Code ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 7 “Martial Law extends to property, and to
persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that government.” Article 7 Lieber code
Subjects or Aliens – nobody else
Does NOT affect sovereignty
Why would anyone want to be a lowlife scumbag US citizen
If a military police officer is talking to you, then you are a subject and you are the enemy
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 7
“All subjects over which the sovereign power
of the state extends are objects of taxation,
but those over which it does not extend are
exempt from taxation. This proposition may
also be pronounced as self-evident. The
sovereignty of the state extends to everything
which exists by its authority or its
permission.” McCullough v Maryland, 17 U.S. [4
Wheat] 316 (1819). [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Subject = Slave = Enemy “The Congress shall have power to dispose of
and make all needful rules and regulations
respecting the…. other property belonging to
the United States…...” Article 4, Section 3,
Clause 2, Constitution for the United States of
America
“Section 2 Definitions (1) In this Act,
owned means, subject to the regulations,…..;”
Canadian Ownership and Control Determination
Act
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 43
Subject = Slave = Enemy "The term resident and citizen of the United States is
distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states,
in that the former is a special class of citizen created by
Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
“[T]he term "citizen," in the United States, is analogous
to the term "subject" in the common law.” State vs
Manual 20 NC 122, 14 C.J.S. 4, p 430
"Civil rights under the 14th amendment are for Federal
citizens and not State Citizens; Federal citizens, as
parents, have no right to the custody of their infant
children except subject to the paramount right of the
State." Wadleigh v. Newhall, Circuit Court N. Dist. Cal., Mar
13, 1905 ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Subject = Slave = Enemy “...it is evident that they [U.S. citizens] have not the
political rights which are vested in citizens of the
States. They are not constituents of any community
in which is vested any sovereign power of
government. Their position partakes more of the
character of subjects than of citizens. They are
subject to the laws of the United States, but have no
voice in its management. If they are allowed to make
laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the
sanction of a Government in which they are not
represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the
political rights of citizens they cannot enjoy…”
People v. De La Guerra,40 Cal. 311, 342 (A.D. 1870) ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Article 10 Lieber Code
“Martial Law affects chiefly the police and collection of public revenue and taxes, whether imposed by the expelled government or by the invader, and refers mainly to the support and efficiency of the army, its safety, and the safety of its operations.” Article 10, Lieber Code
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 47
Lieber Code Article 10
All police are military police
FBI military police
City military police
State military police
Homeland Security military police
County military police
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 10
All police are military
police and if they are
talking to you, then you
are a subject and you are
the enemy!!!
©Common Law Copyright 2019
You are the Enemy
You are the Enemy
You are the Enemy
You are the Enemy
Lieber Code Article 13 “Military jurisdiction is of two kinds: First, that which
is conferred and defined by statute; second, that which is derived from the common law of war. Military offenses under the statute law must be tried in the manner therein directed; but military offenses which do not come within the statute must be tried and punished under the common law of war. The character of the courts which exercise these jurisdictions depends upon the local laws of each particular country. In the armies of the United States the first is exercised by courts-martial, while cases which do not come within the "Rules and Articles of War," or the jurisdiction conferred by statute on courts-martial, are tried by military commissions.” Article 13, Lieber Code
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 13
All statutes are in support of the Martial Law
All statutes apply to subjects ONLY
There are 2 kinds of court proceedings, Courts Martial and Military Commissions
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 13
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 13
©Common Law Copyright 2019
References Copies of these documents can be found at My
private group at Yahoo called Administrating-
Your-Public-Servants
For a complete set of Youtube videos with Private
Information Shares, a DVD with over 50
searchable Law Dictionaries, and other books
and forms contact me privately at
Donations to support this work are appreciated. I
prefer gold or silver coin, but as an extremely less
desirable alternative I can accept IOUs (Federal
Reserve Notes, Paypal gifts, checks, money
orders, etc) send me an email for particulars ©Common Law Copyright 2019
CSPOA.ORG
Military Dictatorship Martial Law Supersedes and replaces Common
Law
“…statutes have been passed extending the courts of admiralty and vice-admiralty far beyond their ancient limits for depriving us the accustomed and inestimable privilege of trial by jury, in cases affecting both life and property…….to supersede the course of common law and instead thereof to publish and order the use and exercise of the law martial….….. and for altering fundamentally the form of government established by charter.
We saw the misery to which such despotism would reduce us.” Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms (1775)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Dictatorship
There are no common law offenses against the United States. Only those acts which Congress has forbidden, with penalties for disobedience of its command, are crimes. United States v. Hudson & Goodwin, 11 U.S. (7th Cr.) 32 (1812); United States v. Coolidge, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 415 (1816); United States v. Britton, 108 U.S. 199, 206 (1883); United States v. Eaton, 144 U.S. 677, 687 (1892).
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Dictatorship
Under Texas law, no act or omission is a crime unless made so by statute. Dawson v. Vance, 329 F.Supp. 1320, (D.C.Tex. 1971). The Legislature may create an offense and in same enactment, provide exceptions to its application. Williams v. State, 176 SW2d 177, Tex.Cr.App., 1943.
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Dictatorship
“A. All common law offenses and affirmative defenses are abolished. No conduct or omission constitutes an offense or an affirmative defense unless it is an offense or an affirmative defense under this title or under another statute or ordinance.” Arizona Revised Statutes 13-103. Abolition of common law offenses and affirmative defenses; definition
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Dictatorship
“The common law only so far as it is consistent with and adapted to the natural and physical conditions of this state and the necessities of the people thereof, and not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States or the constitution or laws of this state, or established customs of the people of this state, is adopted and shall be the rule of decision in all courts of this state.” Arizona Revised Statutes 1-201. Adoption of common law; exceptions
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 65
©Common Law Copyright 2019 66
Two National Governments Government officials wear 2 hats
They can represent the unconstitutional corporation, or they can represent the lawful de jure government
Because of our own ignorance (ignore – ance) we have given them evidence of their slave
They presume we are their slave until we defeat their presumption
©Common Law Copyright 2019
You are the Enemy!
“Under International Law of Warfare, all parties to a cause must appear by nom de guerre, because an "alien enemy cannot maintain an action during the war in his own name". Merriam-Webster Dictionary, pg. 1534
"A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons." Black's Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420
©Common Law Copyright 2019
You are the Enemy! “The United States acknowledge and protect, in
hostile countries occupied by them, religion and morality; strictly private property; the persons of the inhabitants, especially those of women: and the sacredness of domestic relations. Offenses to the contrary shall be rigorously punished.
This rule does not interfere with the right of the victorious invader to tax the people or their property, to levy forced loans, to billet soldiers, or to appropriate property, especially houses, lands, boats or ships, and churches, for temporary and military uses” Article 37, Lieber Code
©Common Law Copyright 2019
You are the Enemy
"The forced loans of 1862 and 1863, in the form of legal tender notes, were vital forces in the struggle for national supremacy. They formed a part of the public debt of the United States, ..." Julliard v. Greenman, 110 US 432.
Federal Reserve Notes = Military Script
Federal Reserve Notes = Forced Loans – they are forcing the enemy (you) to loan the government money
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Martial Law Statutes
"Governments [ any sovereign] descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . ... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.” Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943)
Federal Reserve Notes = Military Script
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Martial Law Statutes All statutes are Martial Law Statutes
All statutes apply to subjects ONLY
The military police often say “you think our laws don’t apply to you”
The Lieber Code says it all
“Do they even teach you to read???”
The last thing they want to talk about is War Crimes
War Crimes precipitate revolutions
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 73
©Common Law Copyright 2019 74
©Common Law Copyright 2019 75
War Crimes “No contract, agreement or regulation shall impair
the right of any worker, whether voluntary or not and wherever he may be, to apply to the representatives of the Protecting Power in order to request the said Power’s intervention.
All measures aiming at creating unemployment or at restricting the opportunities offered to workers in an occupied territory, in order to induce them to work for the Occupying Power, are prohibited.” Article 52, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes “(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers
and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).” 5 USC § 552a. (a)(13) [emphasis added]
Anybody with a Social Security Number is “federal personnel”
If they compel the disclosure of a SSN, they are compelling you to work for the occupying power
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes Filing fees are a regulation
Court rules are a regulation
By turning on their emergency lights they are terrorizing you
Coercing information from you or a third party is a war crime
When they coerce a date of birth from you they are compelling you to work for the occupying power – a war crime
When they use their regulations to deny you justice – it is a war crime
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Occupation “Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect
for their persons, their honour, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs.
They shall at all times be humanely treated, and shall be protected especially against all acts of violence or threats thereof and against insults and public curiosity.
Women shall be especially protected against any attack on their honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitution, or any form of indecent assault.
Without prejudice to the provisions relating to their state of health, age and sex, all protected persons shall be treated with the same consideration by the Party to the conflict in whose power they are, without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race, religion or political opinion….” Article 27, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes
When they stop you, because you have plates on your vehicle that are NOT state plates, they are persecuting you for your political opinion
When they drag you into their kangaroo court they are subjecting you to their satanic religious ceremony
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Advertisement Don’t forget to subscribe to this Youtube
channel
Don’t forget to follow me on Steemit @sovereigntyintl
Don’t forget to Like this video
On Youtube don’t forget to click the bell next to the subscribe button so that you are notified when there is a new upload
On steemit don’t forget to vote and make your comments
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Warfare = Military Occupation
“…..the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise …, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory …., even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance…..” Article 2, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Warfare = Commerce When that LEO (PIG) stops you with his emergency
lights
He is armed
He is wearing a military uniform with military rank insignia
It is an armed conflict whether you recognize it or not!
The fact that he stopped you is proof that he is accusing you of being a subject
"A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons." Black's Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Occupation “…., the Occupying Power shall be
bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such Power exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the present Convention: 1 to 12, 27, 29 to 34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 59, 61 to 77, 143.” Article 6, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Lieber Code Article 44 “All wanton violence committed against persons in the
invaded country, all destruction of property not commanded by the authorized officer, all robbery, all pillage or sacking, even after taking a place by main force, all rape, wounding, maiming, or killing of such inhabitants, are prohibited under the penalty of death, or such other severe punishment as may seem adequate for the gravity of the offense.
A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and disobeying a superior ordering him to abstain from it, may be lawfully killed on the spot by such superior.” Article 44, Lieber Code
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes “Collective penalties and likewise all measures of
intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.” Article 33, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949
Military Uniforms are designed to be intimidating
The carrying of guns, by their code enforcers, (PIGs) is intimidating, especially if they have laws preventing you from owning guns
If the PIG yells at you because you are NOT cooperating, it is threatening and intimidating
Their uniforms and vehicle colors and paint scheme are designed to be threatening and intimidating
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes “No protected person may be punished for an
offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.
Pillage is prohibited.
Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.” Article 33, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949
If they seize your property, it is pillaging and reprisals
They are taking reprisals against you because you don’t want to be their slave
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Subscription Channels I have exclusive videos available on my website
www.sovereigntyinternational.fyi
2 subscription levels, and I accept crypto currencies
$29.99/year for the videos only
$49.99/year for videos plus unlimited consultations – I am NOT a liar (Attorney) but I can tell you what I would do and where to find forms
The ONLY power that the N.W.O. satanists have over us is through fraud and deception, and my agenda is to expose it for all our benefit – I cannot fight all of the battles
Currently publishing 1 video a week
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Exclusive Content Arlington Private Information Share
Land Deed Training
Estoppel Certificates Training
Foreclosure Estoppel Certificates Training
Corporate Denial Training
Toll Roads Notice and Demand Training
Invoice Training
Notice of Void Judgment training
Revocation of Signature training
Third Party Witness Training
Federal Habeas Corpus Training
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Exclusive Content Revocation of Voter Registration
Criminal Complaint Training
Lawsuit Training
Other Training (requests?)
Northeast Private Information Share videos
All forms, files and other instructions are available for free on my 2 private groups at YahooGroups and GoogleGroups
All exclusive content will be on my website and you can buy a subscription there
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 92
Cestui que trust
"But individuals, when acting as representatives of a collective group, cannot be said to be exercising their personal rights and duties, nor be entitled to their purely personal privileges. Rather they assume the rights, duties and privileges of the artificial entity or association of which they are agents or officers and they are bound by its obligations." Brasswell v. United States 487 U.S. 99 (1988) quoting, United States v. White 322 U.S. 694 (1944)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
US Citizen = Roman Law = Roman Cult
“Yet still it was found difficult to set bounds to ecclesiastical ingenuity; for when they were driven out of all their former holds, they devised a new method of conveyance, by which the lands were granted, not to themselves directly, but to nominal feoffees to the use of the religious houses; thus distinguishing between the possession and the use, and receiving the actual profits, while the seisin of the lands remained in the nominal feoffee, who was held by the courts of equity (then under the direction of the clergy) to be bound in conscience to account to his cestui que use for the rents and emoluments [taxes] of the estate: and it is to these inventions that our practitioners are indebted for the introduction of uses and trusts, the foundation of modern conveyancing.” Tomlins Law Dictionary 1835 edition, Volume 2 under the definition of Mortmain [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Quasi-Contracts = Commerce “Assumpsit - ….In its origin an action of tort, [assumpsit] was soon transformed into an action of contract, becoming afterwards a remedy where there was neither tort nor contract. Based at first only upon an express promise, it was afterwards supported upon an implied promise, and even upon a fictitious promise. Introduced as a special manifestation of the action on the case, it soon acquired the dignity of a distinct form of action, which superseded Debt, became concurrent with Account, with Case upon a bailment, a warranty, and bills of exchange, and competed with Equity in the case of the essentially equitable quasi-contracts growing out of the principle of unjust enrichment. ….” James Barr Ames, “The History of Assumpsit,” in 3 Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History 298 (1909).” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 379 [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Quasi Contracts
"Both in Roman and English law there are certain obligations which were not in truth contractual, but which the law treats as IF they were. They are contractual in law, but not in fact, being the subject-matter of a fictitious extension of the sphere of contract to cover obligations which do not in reality fall within it." Salmond, Salmond on Jurisprudence, p. 642 (9th Edition, 1937, Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd. England). [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Quasi Contracts "Constructive/quasi contracts are based solely upon
a legal fiction or fiction of law." Hill v. Waxberg, 237 F.2d 936.
"It is a well settled rule of law that he who seeks benefits of contract must also assume burdens." Higgins v. Monckton (1938), 28 C.A.2d 723, 83 P.2d 516.
"Voluntary acceptance of benefit of transaction is equivalent to consent to all obligations arising from it, so far as facts are known, or ought to be known, to person accepting." Northern Assurance Co. v. Stout (1911), 16 C.A. 548, 117 P. 617.
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Quasi Contracts = Benefits
Why do you think they want a Social Security Number when you apply for a Drivers License?
Or Unemployment Insurance?
Or a Passport?
Or any other “benefit”
All they need is a date of birth to pull up their cestui que trust in their hearsay database
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Kangaroo Courts are Everywhere!
“Kangaroo court. Term descriptive of a sham legal proceeding in which a person's rights are totally disregarded and in which the result is a foregone conclusion because of the bias of the court or other tribunal.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 868
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Contact Information My Blog is; http://sovereigntyinternational.wordpress.com
Website - www.sovereigntyinternational.fyi
Email - [email protected]
Youtube profile – sovereignliving
Facebook - Community Page - Deleted
Private Group – Sovereignty International – Being deleted
Yahoo Private Group – Administrating-Your-Public-Servants
Google Private Group – Administrating-Your-Public-Servants
Follow me on twitter @engineerwin
Follow me on Steemit https://steemit.com/@sovereigntyintl
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/sovereigntyinternational/
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes
“No physical or moral coercion shall be exercised against protected persons, in particular to obtain information from them or from third parties.” Article 31, Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949
This could be used against the NSA and the CIA, or Facebook, or the banksters compelling the disclosure of a SSN
It can also be used against the PIGs when they coerce information from you on the side of the road
They are coercing information about you from the DMV database
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes “The High Contracting Parties specifically agree that
each of them is prohibited from taking any measure of such a character as to cause the physical suffering or extermination of protected persons in their hands. This prohibition applies not only to murder, torture, corporal punishment, mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person, but also to any other measures of brutality whether applied by civilian or military agents.” Article 32, Geneva Convention to the Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Occupation
“Terrorism - noun – 2 A system of government that seeks to rule by intimidation.” Funk and Wagnal’s New Practical Standard Dictionary (1946)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019
United Nations = Roman Law =
Roman Cult
“The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.” International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 1, Clause 3 [emphasis added]
©Common Law Copyright 2019
(bought and paid for) Clerk
masquerading as a Judge = War Crime
“All persons shall be equal before the
courts and tribunals. In the determination
of any criminal charge against him, or of
his rights and obligations in a suit at law,
everyone shall be entitled to a fair and
public hearing by a competent,
independent and impartial tribunal
established by law.” International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, Article 14, Clause
1
©Common Law Copyright 2019
(bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading
as a Judge = War Crimes
“No sentence shall be pronounced by the competent courts of the Occupying Power except after a regular trial….” Article 71 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949
“It is a fundamental right of a party to have a
neutral and detached judge preside over the
judicial proceedings.” Ward v Village of
Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62, 93 S.Ct 80, 83, 34
L.Ed. 2d 267 (1972); Tumey v Ohio, 273 U.S. 510,
5209, 47 S. Ct. 437, 440, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Other Videos Bankster Thieves playlist
Roman Cult playlist
Bankrupt Corporate (so-called) Governments
BAR Members 1 - 4
D.I.Y. How NOT to Volunteer for the Selective Service and the Draft
Martial Law is here!
D.I.Y. No Income Tax
D.I.Y. Free Mail
D.I.Y. Kangaroo Courts 1 – 15
Canada Border PIGs playlist
BAR Members and their Satanic Connections playlist ©Common Law Copyright 2019
(bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading
as a Judge = War Crimes
If the “Judge” denies your challenge to jurisdiction
without making the prosecutor prove jurisdiction,
then it is a war crime in violation of Article 71 of
the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection
of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949
He is NOT neutral or unbiased – I would say “so
we are doing war crimes here are we?”
Either they have jurisdiction and can prove it, or
the Judge MUST dismiss the case
©Common Law Copyright 2019
(bought and paid for) Clerk
masquerading as a Judge = War
Crimes
"if the record does not show
upon its face the facts necessary
to give jurisdiction, they will be
presumed not to have existed.“
Norman v. Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Military Occupation
“Protected persons may in no circumstances renounce in part or in entirety the rights secured to them by the present Convention, …...” Article 8, Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes
“The Party to the conflict in whose hands protected persons may be, is responsible for the treatment accorded to them by its agents, irrespective of any individual responsibility which may be incurred.” Article 29, Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 114
©Common Law Copyright 2019 115
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019
©Common Law Copyright 2019 118
War Crimes These Roman Cult satanists are bending over
backwards to make you think you have constitutional rights
It is extremely important to them that people do not figure this out because the last time they were doing War crimes, it precipitated a revolution
If you challenge jurisdiction, the (so-called) judge is required to compel the prosecutor to prove jurisdiction, or dismiss the case. If they do anything else it is a denial of due process – a war crime
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes They are cowards
They are real brave when there are 20 or 30 of them but when it is just you and them they are cowards!
They sneak around and fabricate evidence that you are the enemy and a subject (their slave) but they will never confront you without lots of their buddies to back them up
You are the enemy and the sooner you figure that out the better
You are a subject and their slave and the sooner you figure that out the better
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes “Give me liberty or give me death” Patrick Henry after
witnessing a man flogged to death for refusing to take a license
They were assaulting people with their Roman Cult cestui que trust
"In doing this, I shall have occasion incidentally to evince, how true it is that States and Governments were made for man, and, at the same time, how true it is that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next vilified, and, at last oppressed their master and maker." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dal. 419 at p 455
"A state like a merchant makes a contract. A dishonest state, like a dishonest merchant willfully refuses to discharge it." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dal. 419 at p 456, and further,
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes “Government is not
reason, it is not
eloquence,—it is
force! Like fire, it is a
dangerous servant, and a
fearful master; …...”
George Washington ©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes The communists in the Southern Poverty Law Center
are responsible
They are persecuting you for your political beliefs
They are taking reprisals against you because you don’t want to be their slave
They are pillaging your property
They are NOT respecting your religious beliefs
They are terrorizing you
They are threatening you
They are coercing information from you and from third parties
They are engaging in Genocide against State Citizens ©Common Law Copyright 2019
Sovereign Citizen = Reprisals
Sovereign Citizen = Reprisals
War Crimes Remember – It is Warfare – You have to treat it like it
is warfare because that is EXACTLY what it is
Don’t wait for them to attack you, attack them first
Make an Affidavit of Corporate Denial
Serve them with a Notice and Demand that is designed to take away their presumptions – if you do this effectively it will put them in a very difficult position
If the PIGs stop you – it is warfare – “So we are doing war crimes today?” “Are you coercing information from me?” “Are you taking reprisals against me?”
Begin building a case against them from the beginning – it is warfare ©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes “In arriving at our decision in this matter we do not
depart in any way from our holding in Huendling v.
Jensen [*300] that the doctrine of judicial immunity
extends to courts of limited jurisdiction. But, when a
minor magistrate acts wholly without jurisdiction,
civil liability attaches for his malicious and corrupt
abuse of process and his willful and malicious
oppression of any person under the pretense of
acting in his official capacity. See Huendling v.
Jensen, 168 NW2d at 749 and authorities cited.”188
N.W.2d 294; 1971 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 863; 64 A.L.R.3d
1242
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Malicious Prosecution
"Although probable cause may
not be inferred from malice,
malice may be inferred from lack
of probable cause." Pauley v. Hall,
335 N. W. 2d 197, 124 Mich App 255
©Common Law Copyright 2019
War Crimes • “(3) Lack of Subject-Matter
Jurisdiction. If the court
determines at any time that it
lacks subject-matter jurisdiction,
the court must dismiss the
action.” Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure 12 (h) (3)
©Common Law Copyright 2019
Official Oppression “(a) A public servant acting under color of his office
or employment commits an offense if he;
(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or
arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession,
assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the
exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power,
or immunity, knowing his conduct to be unlawful;
or….
(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant
acts under color of his office or employment if he
acts or purports to act in an official capacity or
takes advantage of such actual or purported
capacity.” Texas Penal Code § 39.03 Official
Oppression
Official Oppression “(a) A public servant….with intent to obtain a
benefit or….to harm or defraud another, he
intentionally or knowingly;
(1) violates a law relating to the public servant’s
office or employment; or
(2) misuses government property, services,
personnel or anything of value belonging to the
government that has come into the public
servant’s custody or possession by virtue of the
public servant’s office or employment.” Texas
Penal Code § 39.02 Abuse of Official Capacity
Simulating a Legal Process “(a) A person commits an offense if the person
recklessly causes to be delivered to another any
document that simulates a summons, complaint,
judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in
response to the document, in compliance with the
document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person
with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended
recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was
delivered…..” Texas Penal Code Sec. § 32.48. Simulating
Legal Process
Organized Crime “(a) Conspired to commit…engage in
conduct that would constitute the
offense…or…perform an overt act…”
(d) Criminal street gang…having a
common identifying sign or symbol or an
identifiable leadership who continuously
or regularly associate in the commission
of criminal activities.”
Texas Penal Code Title 11. Organized Crime,
Chapter 71. Organized Crime § 71.01
CSPOA.ORG