37
Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary Educators within Diverse Classroom Settings: Clinical Practice Models in Action at San Francisco State University Presenters: Dr. Judith Munter, Dean, Graduate College of Education, SFSU Dr. Stephanie Sisk-Hilton, Associate Professor, Elementary Education Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:00-2:00 p.m., EDT

Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

Building Science and Math Proficiency for

Elementary Educators within Diverse Classroom

Settings: Clinical Practice Models in Action at

San Francisco State University

Presenters:

Dr. Judith Munter, Dean, Graduate College of Education, SFSUDr. Stephanie Sisk-Hilton, Associate Professor, Elementary Education

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

1:00-2:00 p.m., EDT

Page 2: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

www.aacte.org

Amanda Lester, AACTE Moderator

Welcome to the third webinar inAACTE’s clinical practice series!

Page 3: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

www.aacte.org

Welcome

Update on the AACTE Clinical Practice Commission

Today’s Presentation:Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary Educators

within Diverse Classroom Settings: Clinical Practice Models in Action at San Francisco State University

Q & A with Presenters

Page 4: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

www.aacte.org

Page 5: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

www.aacte.org

•–

Page 6: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

6

Presenters

Dr. Judith Munter

Dean, Graduate College of

Education, SFSU

Dr. Stephanie Sisk-Hilton

Associate Professor,

Elementary Education

Page 7: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

Clinical Practice Models in Action at

San Francisco State University

Building Science and Math Proficiency

for Elementary Educators within

Diverse Classroom Settings:

Page 8: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

8

Contributors

Dr. Isabel Quita, Professor,

Elementary Education

Dr. Maria Zavala, Assistant

Professor, Elementary Education

Dr. Marguerite Conrad, Assistant

Professor, Elementary Education Dr. Timothy Weekes, Postdoctoral

Researcher, Graduate College of

Education

Page 9: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

9

San Francisco State University

San Francisco State University was founded in 1899

as a Teacher’s College. Today, we continue our

commitment to excellence in preparing outstanding

educators and leaders who transform lives in schools

and communities.

Page 10: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

10

SFSU’s Graduate College of Education

• Programs offered include an undergraduate major

in communicative disorders and minors in

education and special education. Post-bac

Credentials and Master’s Degrees are offered for

teachers and speech-language pathologists.

Opportunities for doctoral study include the Ed.D.

for K-12 and community college leaders, and a

Joint Ph.D. with UC Berkeley in special education.

• The pipeline for students who plan to be

elementary teachers typically is through a B.A. in

Liberal Studies or in Child & Adolescent

Development.

Page 11: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

11

This Webinar

Will feature 5 instances of innovative and effective

approaches to clinical practice for current and future

elementary teachers with implications for urban

settings. Dr. Sisk-Hilton will provide an overview of

practices that are embedded throughout the

continuum of professional preparation, beginning

pre-admission (undergraduate years), throughout the

credential preparation program, and into the ongoing

professional development of both novice and

experienced teachers.

Page 12: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

12

The Problems of Clinical Practice in

Elementary School STEM

• Most elementary teachers (including master

teachers) feel underprepared to teach STEM

• Time spent on science at k-5 level tends to be very

low (16% of CA teachers report teaching none)

• Models that student teachers experience often

don’t match current understanding of how children

learn/ move toward NGSS and CCSS aligned

practices

Page 13: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

13

Goals of SFSU’s Multi-Tiered Supports for

Clinical Practice in Elementary STEM Education

• Provide ongoing opportunities for adult learners to

engage in and reflect on NGSS and CCSS aligned

practices of math, science and engineering

• Create continuum from tightly supervised to

collaboratively designed models of clinical supervision to

match pre-service and in-service teachers’ needs

• Build partnerships with schools and districts to increase

coherence between teacher training and school

expectations and needs

• Focus efforts on increasing rich, ambitious engagement

in STEM content for linguistically, culturally, and racially

diverse classrooms

Page 14: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

Improved STEM

Learning for Clinical Practice

Undergraduate (pre-admission to teacher

ed.): STEM House Partnership (on campus, tightly supervised clinical

model)

Credential (Pre-Service):

“Intensives” to model strong practice and build

PCK

Credential (Pre-Service): Methods class

instruction embedded in model classroom

MA Level: Integration of Science and Literacy

Practices in Supported Clinical Experience for

novice and experienced teachers

In-Service/ Master Teacher: Development of

context-rich science practices for expert

teachers

Page 15: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

15

Goals of Undergraduate Clinical Experience

in Elementary STEM Education

• Increase interest in elementary teaching among STEM prepared undergrads

• Increase interest in STEM among pre-service elementary teachers

• Provide early clinical experience that allows students to engage in NGSS aligned practices

• Strengthen university/ school partnerships

Page 16: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

16

STEM HOUSE

• Innovative clinical experience/ school partners

come to campus

• Upper Level undergraduate students:

intentional mix of STEM majors + traditional

pipeline majors (Liberal Studies, Child &

Adolescent Development)

• Class sessions alternate learning about STEM

education and putting ideas into practice

• Teach small groups of children under direct

supervision on campus

• Chance to reflect and re-teach

• Partner schools visit SFSU on field trips

• Content rich pedagogy: semesters alternate

planetary science and evolutionary biology

“This is the best day of my life!”

– 3rd grader. After putting on lab coat.

Page 17: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

17

STEM House Results

• 100% positive course evaluations

• Visiting partner school classroom teachers report strong positive impact on children’s ideas about science and about college

• Well over half of participating teachers have returned every semester since inception

• According to student self-reports in year one, all reported increased interest in elementary teaching

• Strengthened ongoing interdisciplinary partnership between SFSU College of Education and College of Science and Engineering as collaborators in the STEM Education Clinical model for future teachers

Page 18: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

18

Goals of Clinical Experiences in STEM for

Pre-Service Elementary Teachers

• Increase students’ engagement with NGSS and CCSS aligned models of effective pedagogy

• Allow students to experience the teaching and learning environments we hope they build with children

• Increase students’ confidence with the content and practices of effective science teaching and learning

• Make science and math education experiences more salient in a crowded curriculum

• Provide trajectory of clinical practice experiences from high to low direct supervision

Page 19: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

19

Science Methods “Intensive” Model

• Pre-service teachers engage in 6

consecutive full day sessions that

immerse them in science teaching

and learning

• Complete focus on science (no other

classes or student teaching)

• Students leave intensives with a plan

for (co-) teaching science mini-unit in

their clinical placements

• Planning teams collaborate during

implementation to provide support

• Subsequent clinical practice-based

sessions allow students to analyze

and refine practice with colleagues

Page 20: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

20

Science Intensives Results

• Average course evaluations well above

departmental mean in every implementation for

past 6 years

• Student comments indicate feeling much more

prepared to teach science as result of course

• At least 4 participants in past 3 years have become

science specialists/ lead science teachers for their

schools (unintended consequence)

Page 21: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

21

Pre-Service Bilingual Math Education: Real-

Time Practice Under Expert Supervision

• Problem of supporting bilingual teachers in training (aspirantes) to develop culturally responsive mathematics teaching practices in intensive, one year preparation program

• Proposed solutions: Split methods class into two main parts, one involving working with real kids in a Spanish immersion setting – create urgency and opportunity for live coaching

1. Focus on particular teaching practices that cut across lessons: number talks, launching word problems, leading a discussion from student work

2. Align teaching practices with content areas most challenging for Aspirantes: multi-digit multiplication and division, fraction word problems

3. Aspirantes taught some, observed some in partner classroom

Page 22: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

22

Implementation

November:

• First Contact

with T

• Ongoing

observations

of Aspirantes

Late January:

Class started!

Tues-Wed x 2

weeks

AM: On campus

do math together,

plan activity with

peer/teacher feedback,

opportunities to raise

issues related to CRMT

PM: At School

(1 hr break for lunch and to

get to the school)

Teach children for 1 hr,

Debrief after children gone,

wrap up

Early January:• Met with T

• Selected/desig

ned tasks good

for the kids

• Built up

excitement!

• Logistics

Daily

Schedule

Page 23: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

23

Reflections from Aspirantes

• “It was a necessary opportunity to figure out how to say many things in Spanish – academic language like vocabulary and also better phrasing of questions”

• “It’s hard to learn how to back off and let students struggle with the math – having a coach there to remind me helped me practice this.”

• “Learning about and then having to do discussions around mathematics very valuable – I am better prepared to listen to students and know what to listen for.”

Page 24: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

24

Clinical Practice for MA Level Students:

Integrating Science and Literacy

• Reading specialist credential

requires clinical practice

component

• Partnership school

described ongoing needs in

both literacy and science

• Clinical component re-

designed to fit needs of both

MA students and partner

school

Page 25: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

25

After School Literacy Clinic at

Bayshore Elementary School

• 15 week course/ 11 weeks

have field component

• Practice advanced literacy

assessment and instruction

techniques under direct

faculty supervision

• Use context of science to

build meaning for children

• Coordinate with school site

teachers and administrator

to provide family literacy and

science night

Page 26: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

26

Support for Inservice Teachers: Refining

and Reflecting on Clinical Practice

• Science teaching and

learning in most

elementary classrooms is

not yet aligned with best

practices and NGSS

• To support teacher

preparation, we must work

directly with in-service

teachers to coordinate

curricular and pedagogical

improvement at all levels

Page 27: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

27

The California Elementary Mathematics and

Science Professional Learning Initiative (CEMSPLI)

This project is one excellent example of the ways in which the

California Department of Education (CDE) Professional Learning

Support Division funds institutions of higher education, in

partnership with high-need local educational agencies to provide

professional learning opportunities. SF State’s Project, ExCEL

works with teams of elementary teachers and their principals to

strengthen their content, pedagogical, and collective knowledge

and instructional leadership skills for the continued implementation

of the California academic content standards for mathematics

(CACSM) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).

Page 28: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

28

Project ExCEL: Elementary Science and

Engineering in Local Contexts

Project Goals:

• Increase pedagogical content knowledge to support teaching science

using the NGSS practices of science and engineering

• Modify content and strategies of science curriculum to connect to

local context and students’ lives

• Develop leadership teams to support implementation of NGSS across

the region

• Increase family participation in science through building a STEM

community partnership

Page 29: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

29

Project ExCEL:

Connections to Clinical Practice

• Increase rich science learning environments in classrooms/ schools that mentor student teachers

• Increase coherence between university and district efforts

• Provide support for professional pathways beyond initial licensure

Page 30: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

30

English Language and Literacy Integration

into Subject Areas (ELLISA) Project

Project Goals

• Develop a model of EL-focused Elementary

Teacher Preparation based on effective EL

practices that integrate the teaching of language

and literacy into science, mathematics and social

studies

• Develop pre-service teacher education and

professional development materials to support the

implementation of the ELLISA model across

contexts

Page 31: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

31

ELLISSA Principals for Improving

Teaching and Learning

Integrating subject matter with language and literacy

development improves both

• Integrating science, language, and literacy instruction

increases achievement in language development,

reading, writing and science content.

• Using contextualized language, literacy and context in

mathematics has an impact on achievement.

Page 32: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

32

ELLISSA Project Model

• Revise Teacher Education Courses: Revise

methods courses in science, math, and social

studies to include practices that support integration

of literacy and academic language development

• Improve University/ Clinical Practice

Connection

O Provide professional development in ELLISSA practices for

master teachers

O Match ELLISSA master teachers with student teachers in

ELLISSA revised methods classes

• 50 master teachers and 200 student teachers have

participated 2011-2016 (SFSU and SJSU)

Page 33: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

33

Lessons Learned for Supporting Elementary

STEM Education Through Clinical Practice

• Must attend to differing needs along trajectory from pre-

teacher education undergraduates to credential

candidates to novice and expert/ master teachers

• Teachers and teachers in training need rich experiences

learning in NGSS and CCSS aligned ways in

conjunction with supported clinical practice experiences

• Strong university/ school partnerships support

coherence of implementation and supportive learning

environment for students and teachers alike

• Teachers, like all people, are more likely to do things

they enjoy and feel competent doing!

Page 34: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

34

STEM House: Stephanie Sisk-Hilton ([email protected])

and Isabel Quita ([email protected])

Science Methods Intensive Model: Stephanie Sisk-Hilton

Aspirantes Math Partnership: Maria Zavala

([email protected])

ELLISSA: Isabel Quita

Project ExCEL: Stephanie Sisk-Hilton and Marguerite

Conrad

Bayshore/SFSU Literacy Clinic: Marguerite Conrad

([email protected])

Project Leadership Contact Information

These initiatives are all collaborative efforts with SFSU’s College of Education, partner districts, and other university and community partnerships. PIs and coordinators are listed below for the purposes of seeking further information.

Page 35: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

35

School District Partners and

Grant Agencies

San Francisco Unified

School District

California Department of

Education (Project ExCEL)

Bayshore Elementary School

District

National Science Foundation

(Ellissa)

Page 36: Building Science and Math Proficiency for Elementary

www.aacte.org

Questions?