Upload
tatiana-mcdougall
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
•BRIEF OVER VIEW OF THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR ENGINES•describes geometry for a fixture loosely representing an aircraft engine nacelle•describes process to produce a representation of the current level of safety protecting these spaces•puts halon through an “obstacle course” looking for a specified performance•upon achieving the specified performance, pull out the halon and iterate to a quantity of a replacement repeating the same performance as halon•quantify replacement
•DISCUSSED SIMULATOR CONFIGURATION AND PROVIDED CURRENT SIMULATOR STATUS•provided schematic view of the simulator•discussed hot plates; plate heating configuration resolved, still need to get plate into the core section•discussed heating the air flow stream; will do it in 2 steps, one heat addition at the inlet and second heat addition from the heated surface of the simulator core•presented curve characterizing flow capacity of simulator; @65°F, range of 2-11 lbm/s and 15-80 compartment changes per minute•1-2 months remain to completion
•DISCUSSED HALONYZER DISCREPANCIES•fire testing in 1998 indicated fire test data timeline did not correlate with Halonyzer II timeline for distribution•performed in-house testing to evaluate nature and magnitude of discrepancy•determined the key discrepant factor was the transport of the sample through the sampling probe (tube to transport sample from the sample point to the transducer)•resulted in selecting a smaller probe•correction closely matches a near-square wave trace with a twenty foot long probe trace
•DISCUSSED HFC-125 SIMULATION OF HALON 1301 DISTRIBUTION•showed April 1998 test data•showed recent simulator test pairing; concentration magnitudes discrepant•attribute discrepancy to inconsistent weight measurements on the scale used to determine agent quantities•additional work during simulator distribution set up is planned•technical note is in editorial review soon to be published Douglas Ingerson
Federal Aviation AdministrationW.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
Dimensions of Various Cross Section for the Nacelle SimulatorRo or H Ri or W area area comment
in in in^2 ft^2A - - - - transition ductB 11 0 380 2.64 exhaust nozzle cross sectionC 17.5 0 962 6.68 exhaust nozzle cross sectionD 24 12 1357 9.42 test section aft endF 24 12 1357 9.42 test section middleG 24 12 1357 9.42 test section inletH 21 6.51 1252 8.69 inlet diffuser middleJ 18 1.02 1016 7.06 inlet diffuser entranceK 18 0 1018 7.07 approach ductL 18 0 1018 7.07 straightening grillM 18 0 1018 7.07 straightening grill entranceN 35 35 1225 8.51 tube bank heat exchanger shellP 18 0 1018 7.07 transition ductQ 24 17.5 420 2.92 blower outletR - - - - supply blower, 3 hp, 22" dia. inlet
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
Nacelle Simulator Status
•Working on heating the core surface
•Need to mount hot plates
•Need to install two duct heaters at inlet
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
Nacelle Simulator AirFlow Characterization (3hp fan)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Open Inlet Duct Area (in^2)
Mas
s flo
w,
air
(lbm
/s)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Air
Cha
nge
Rat
e (c
ompa
rtm
ent
chan
ges/
min
ute)
mass flo, 23Oct98
mass flo, 27Oct98
mass flo, 9Nov98
mass flo, 24Nov98
air chngs, 23Oct98
air chngs, 27Oct98
air chngs, 9Nov98
air chngs, 24Nov98
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
low temperaturecondition
high temperaturecondition
ambient temperaturecondition
heat
exch
ange
r
entr
ance
todi
ffus
er
begi
n co
resu
rfac
e he
at
fire
sce
nari
olo
cati
ontest
sec
tion
exit
end
core
surf
ace
heat
blow
erin
let
Conceptual Airflow Temperature Profile
Temperature
Length along the simulator
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1000
0
1200
0
1400
0
1600
0
1800
0
2000
0
2200
0
2400
0
2600
0
2800
0
3000
0
Time (ms)
Vol
umet
ric C
once
ntra
tion
(%V
/V)
1/4OD-20ft
1/4OD-10ft
1/8OD-20ft
1/8OD-10ft
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
Comparing Analyzer Response for5% V/V Halon 1301, Varying Probes
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation AdministrationW.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
• Given the compartment ventilation rate (changes/min) in the nacelle is related to that of the analyzer probe.
• Variables given are describing : Q = volumetric flow rate V = internal volume of probe or nacelle A = internal cross sectional area of probe or nacelle L = length of probe or nacelle x dot = average gas flow velocity in probe or nacelle f = factor relating the two air change rates subscript “E”, related to engine nacelle subscript “T”, related to analyzer probe (tube)
• Formulation illustrates air change rates are dependent upon ratios of (neglecting complex flow interactions): lengths of the probe and nacelle gas stream velocities
For true “real-time” history, the transducer must see the gas flow at the same velocity the nacelle sees; the factor of {f * [LE / LT]} must approach 1.
One can treat the nacelle event as a source (as in source/sink relationships) because the total sampling volume from the nacelle flow is negligible; the factor {f * [LE / LT]} can be set to approach zero; therefore capturing the event with inconsequential time dilation considerations.
T
T
EE
T
T
E
E
xfx
L
x
LA
xA
V
Q
LAV
xAQ
f
LL
VQ
VQ
Gas Concentration Data Disagreement with Fire Test
Data
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
The trace from the 1/8”ODx20 ft
long probe is approximately a
pure time displacement of the near-square
wave forms shown.
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
HFC-125 Simulation of a
Halon 1301 Distribution, April 1998
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
HFC-125 Simulation of a
Halon 1301 Distribution, April 1998
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
HFC-125 Simulation of a
Halon 1301 Distribution, April 1998
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
HFC-125 Simulation of a
Halon 1301 Distribution, April 1998
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Nacelle Simulator
HFC-125 Simulation of aHalon 1301 Distribution in the FAA
Nacelle Simulator, 20April1999
Douglas IngersonFederal Aviation Administration
W.J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City Int’l Airport, NJFire Safety section, AAR-422
•Halon 1301 curves are translated along the time axis for clarity.
•the agent weights transferred to the fire extinguisher was not in accordance with the procedure to correctly simulate Halon 1301 with HFC-125.
•Generally agreeable qualitative behavior is still observed