120

Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira
Page 2: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Brasília • DFSeptember 2014

Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food SupplyStrategic Management Offi ce

Minister`s Offi ce

PROJECTIONS OFAGRIBUSINESS

Brazil 2013/14 to 2023/24Long-Term Projections

Page 3: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

© 2014 Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento.All rights reserved. Reproduction permitted provided the source is acknowledged. Responsibility for copyright texts and images of this work is the author. 5th edition. year 2014 Circulation: 1.000 copies

Preparation, distribution, information: MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FOOD SUPPLY Strategic Management Office General Coordination of Strategic Planning Block D, 7th floor, room 752 CEP: 70043-900 Brasília / DF .: Tel (61) 3218 2644 .: Fax (61) 3321 2792 www.agricultura.gov.br email: [email protected]

Customer Service: 0800 704 1995

Editorial coordination: AGE / Mapa

Impresso no Brasil / Printed in Brazil

Biblioteca Nacional de Agricultura - BINAGRI

Catalogação na Fonte

Brazil. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply.Projections of agribusiness : Brazil 2013/14 to 2019/20 Long-

term Projections / Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply. Strategic Management Advisory Board. – Brasília :

MAPA/ACS, 2014.98 p.

ISBN 978-85-7991-087-6

1. Agronegócio- Brasil. 2. Desenvolvimento Econômico. I. Título. II. Título : Brazil 2013/14 to 2019/20 Long-term Projections.

AGRIS E71CDU 339.56

Page 4: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

TEAM:

AGE/Mapa

João Cruz Reis Filho

Renato de Oliveira Brito

José Garcia Gasques

Eliana Teles Bastos

Marco Antonio A. Tubino

TECHNICAL PARTNERS:

Alcido Elenor Wander (Embrapa)

Aroldo Antônio O. Neto (Conab)

Carlos Martins Santiago (Embrapa)

Cid Jorge Caldas (Agroenergia/Mapa)

Daniel Furlan Amaral (Abiove)

Dirceu Talamini (Embrapa)

Djalma F. de Aquino (Conab)

Eledon Oliveira (Conab)

Elieser Barros Correia (Ceplac)

Erly Cardoso Teixeira (UFV)

Fabio Trigueirinho (Abiove)

Francisco Braz Saliba (Bracelpa)

SGE/Embrapa

Geraldo da Silva e Souza

Eliane Gonçalves Gomes

Francisco Olavo B. Sousa (Conab)

Glauco Carvalho (Embrapa)

Gustavo Firmo (Mapa)

Joaquim Bento S. Ferreira (Esalq)

Kennya B. Siqueira (Embrapa)

Leonardo Botelho Zilio (Abiove)

Lucilio Rogério Aparecido Alves (Esalq)

Luis Carlos Job (Mapa)

Luiz Antônio Pinazza (Abag)

Milton Bosco Jr. (Bracelpa)

Olavo Sousa (Conab)

Tiago Quintela Giuliani (Mapa)

Wander Sousa (Conab)

Page 5: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION

2. SCENARIOS OF PROJECTIONS

3. METHODOLOGY

4. RESULTS FOR BRAZIL

a. Grains

b. Coton Lint

c. Rice

d. Bean

e. Corn

f. Wheat

g. Soybean Complex

h. Coffee

i. Milk

j. Sugar

k. Orange and Orange Juice

l. Meat

m. Pulp and Paper

n. Tobacco

o. Fruits

5. RESULTS OF REGIONAL PROJECTIONS

6. SUMMARY

7. BIBLIOGRAPHY

ANNEX 1 - Methodological Note

ANNEX 2 - Results Tables

6

25

67

10

48

84

7

31

73

14

52

91

8

34

75

17

55

94

101

10

46

79

21

58

Page 6: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ABIOVE - Associação Brasileira da Indústria de Óleos Vegetais

ABRAF- Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Florestas Plantadas

AGE - Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica

BRACELPA- Associação Brasileira de Celulose e Papel

CECAT - Centro de Estudos Estratégicos e Capacitação em Agricultura Tropical

CNA - Confederação da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil

CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento

CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira

EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária

FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

FAPRI - Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute

FGV - Fundação Getúlio Vargas

IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística

ICONE - Instituto de Estudos do Comércio e Negociações Internacionais

IFPRI - International Food Policy Research Institute

IPEA - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada

MAPA - Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento

OECD - Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development

ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas

SGE- Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica

UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa

UNICA - União da Indústria de Cana-de-açúcar

USDA - United States Department of Agriculture

Page 7: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

1. INTRODUCTION

This report is an update and revision of the report Projections of Agribusiness - Brazil 2012/13 to 2022/23, Brasília - DF, June 2013, published by the Strategic Management Office of Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply.

The study aims to indicate possible directions of development and provide support to policy makers about the trends of the major agribusiness products. The results also seek to answer to a large number of users in various sectors of national and international economy for which the information now disclosed are of enormous importance. The trends indicated will identify possible trajectories, as well as to structure future vision of agribusiness in the global context for the country keep growing and conquering new markets.

Projections of Agribusiness - Brazil 2013/14 to 2023/24 is a prospective view of the sector, the basis for strategic planning of MAPA - Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply. For their preparation the work of brazilian and international organizations were consulted, some of them based on models projections.

Among the surveyed institutions highlight the work of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development ( OECD), United Nations (UN), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Policy Research Institute / Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (PRIMAFF), Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock of Brazil (CNA), Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV), Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), Institute for International Trade Negotiations (ICONE), Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA), National Supply Company (Conab), Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Energy Research Company (EPE), the Sugar Cane Industry Union (UNICA), Brazilian Association of Planted Forest Producers (ABRAF), Federation of Industries of São Paulo (FIESP), STCP Consulting, Engineering and Management, Brazilian Association of Pulp and Paper (BRACELPA), Brazilian Association of Vegetable Oil Industries (ABIOVE) and the Brazilian Agribusiness Association (ABAG).

The study was conducted by a group of experts from the Ministry of Agriculture and Embrapa, which cooperated in various stages of preparation. Benefited also from the valuable contribution of people / institutions who analyzed the preliminary results and reported their

6

Page 8: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

7

comments, views and ideas on the results of the projections. Observations related to these collaborations were included in the

Report, without nominate partners, but the institutions to which they belong.

2. SCENARIOS OF PROJECTIONS

The scenario of rising prices should remain in 2014. Figure 1 shows the quarterly prices received by U.S. farmers for crops and livestock. Des-pite the relative price fl uctuations, the trend since 2005 has been lifting. Note that the prices of livestock products in 2014 have higher growth rates than crops.

Fig. 1 - Prices Received by Farmers in the United Sta-tes

Source: NASS/USDA, 2014.

80  

133  

57  

98  

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

140  

160  

01/200

5  04

/200

5  07

/200

5  10

/200

5  01

/200

6  04

/200

6  07

/200

6  10

/200

6  01

/200

7  04

/200

7  07

/200

7  10

/200

7  01

/200

8  04

/200

8  07

/200

8  10

/200

8  01

/200

9  04

/200

9  07

/200

9  10

/200

9  01

/201

0  04

/201

0  07

/201

0  10

/201

0  01

/201

1  04

/201

1  07

/201

1  10

/201

1  01

/201

2  04

/201

2  07

/201

2  10

/201

2  01

/201

3  04

/201

3  07

/201

3  10

/201

3  01

/201

4  04

/201

4  

Inde

x  

livestock   Crops  

Page 9: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Domestic prices in Brazil have also shown a tendency to increase in some products as shown in Table 1. For some products, such as soybeans, corn, cattle, rice and cotton prices have shown a trend of growth in 2014. The prices for these products in 2014 are higher than the historical rates and also the prices of 2013.

Table 1 – Prices received by Farmers in Brazil

Brazil expects a record grains harvest in 2014, estimated at 193.6 million tons.

3. METHODOLOGY

The projections cover the period 2013/14 to 2023/24. In general, the basic period of the projections cover 20 years. Taking into account the last year experience, we decided to use, this year as a basic reference period information after 1994. Between 1994 and today, as we know, entered a phase of economic stabilization and this allowed a reduction of uncertainty in variables.

Source: Cepea/Usp. Position at 17/04/2014

8

Product UnitHistorical

price2013 2014

Wheat R$/t 460.3 686.8 606.98

Soybean R$/SC 60kg 37.5 65.4 67.7

Corn R$/SC 60kg 23.9 26.9 30.2

Bovine R$/@ 64.5 105 122.5

Rice R$/SC 50kg 26.8 33.8 35.3

Cotton Cent./libra peso 136.12 202.14 219.9

Page 10: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

9

The projections were performed using specific econometric models. They are time series models that have great use in forecasting series. The use of these models in Brazil, for the purpose of this report is unprecedented. We are not aware of published studies in the country who have worked with these models.

Three statistical models were used: exponential smoothing, Box-Jenkins (Arima) and State-Space Model. There is a methodological note (Annex 1) which presents the main characteristics of the three models.

The projections were performed for 26 agribusiness products: corn, soybeans, wheat, orange, orange juice, chicken, beef, pork, sugar cane, sugar, cotton, soybean meal, soybean oil, fresh milk, beans, rice, potatoes, cassava, tobacco, coffee, cocoa, grape, apple, banana, pulp and paper.

The report, however, not discussed all products, but their data are shown in the tables that are part of the Annexes of the study.

The choice of the most likely model was made as follows:

1 Consistency of results;

2 International comparisons of data production, consumption, export, import and trade in the country and the world.;

3 last trend of our data;

4 Growth Potential;

5. Consultations with experts.

The projections were generally for production, consumption, export, import and planted area. Some tests with productivity of some crops were conducted. The tendency was to choose more conservative models and not those indicated bolder growth rates. This procedure was used for selecting the most selected results.

The projections presented in this report are national, where the number of products studied is comprehensive; and regional, where the number of analyzed products is restricted and has specific interest.

Page 11: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

10

The projections are accompanied by prediction intervals which become wider with time. The greatest breadth of these ranges reflects the greater uncertainty associated with more distant the last year of the series used as the basis of the projection forecasts.

4. RESULTS FORECASTS FOR BRAZIL

a. Grains

Projections of grains refers to the 15 products surveyed monthly by CONAB as part of their harvest surveys. This set of products is called grains by Conab.

As of this update projections already has the data to the eighth survey of harvest (May survey) for the soy complex products, corn and other products, was used for the 2013/2014 harvest data released by Conab( 2014 ): soybean, soybean oil, soybean meal, corn, beans, meat (beef, chicken, pork), and sugar cane. Thus, the data from 2013/2014 are projections Conab. The projections in this report for these products starting in 2014/2015.

The estimates of grain production point to a crop of 193.6 million tons in 2013/14, and a planted area of 56.4 million hectares (Conab 2014). These two variables are the largest that have been achieved in Brazil over the years.

Page 12: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

11

Table 2 – Planted area and Production of Grains

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with Conab information.* Models used: Space states.

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit

2013/14 193,566 - 56,861 -

2014/15 199,656 217,428 58,553 61,469

2015/16 205,411 226,469 59,741 65,172

2016/17 211,315 236,349 60,729 68,068

2017/18 217,176 245,257 61,654 70,621

2018/19 223,056 254,002 62,555 72,917

2019/20 228,930 262,458 63,448 75,051

2020/21 234,807 270,744 64,338 77,063

2021/22 240,684 278,874 65,227 78,985

2022/23 246,560 286,879 66,115 80,834

2023/24 252,437 294,778 67,004 82,624

Production (thousand tons)

Planted Area (thousand hectares)Year

Production 30.4%Planted Area 17.8%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

Page 13: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

12

Fig. 2 – Planted area and Production of Grains

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

For 2014/2015 the production expected to be between 199.7 million and 217.4 million tons of grains. This range of variation is a safety for the occurrence of changes over which one has or little control such as climate change droughts and rains.

Projections for 2023/2024 are a crop around 252.4 million tonnes, representing an increase of 30.4% over the current crop. At the upper end projection indicates a production of up to 294.8 million tons in 2023/24. The grain area should increase 17.8% between 2013/14 and 2023/24, from 56.9 million in 2013/2014 to 67.0 million in 2023/2024, which corresponds to an annual increase of 1.6 %.

56,861   67,004  

193,566  252,437  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

150,000  

200,000  

250,000  

300,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

Planted  Area  (thousand  hectares)   Produc>on  (thousand  tons)  

Page 14: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

13

Table 3 – Brazil: Planted Area with Five Main Grains

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

Rice 3,916 3,018 2,967 2,875 2,909 2,765 2,820 2,427 2,400 2,417

Bean 3,949 4,224 4,088 3,993 4,148 3,609 3,990 3,262 3,075 3,359

Corn 12,208 12,964 14,055 14,766 14,172 12,994 13,806 15,178 15,829 15,726

Soybean 23,301 22,749 20,687 21,313 21,743 23,468 24,181 25,042 27,736 30,105

Wheat 2,756 2,362 1,758 1,852 2,396 2,428 2,150 2,166 2,210 2,617

Total 46,131 45,317 43,554 44,799 45,368 45,263 46,947 48,075 51,250 54,225

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24

Rice 2,318 2,220 2,121 2,022 1,924 1,825 1,726 1,627 1,529 1,430

Bean 3,245 3,131 3,016 2,902 2,788 2,674 2,559 2,445 2,331 2,217

Corn 15,659 15,874 15,993 16,080 16,188 16,303 16,412 16,520 16,630 16,739

Soybean 31,598 32,764 33,785 34,751 35,697 36,633 37,565 38,496 39,427 40,357

Wheat 2,676 2,734 2,793 2,851 2,910 2,968 3,027 3,085 3,144 3,203

Total 55,495 56,722 57,708 58,606 59,506 60,402 61,289 62,174 63,060 63,945

Page 15: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

14

b. Cotton lint

Cotton production is concentrated in the states of Mato Grosso, Goiás and Bahia, which account for in 2013/14 90.7% of the country’s production. Mato Grosso has the lead with 56.2% of the national production been folloed by state of Bahia, with 29.8% of the Brazilian production, and Goiás, with 4.9%.

The projections for cotton lint production indicate 1.67 million tons in 2013/2014 and 2.35 million tons in 2023/24. This expansion corresponds to a growth rate of 3.1% per year over the projection period and an increase of 40.5% in production. Some analysts noted that the projected production is quite high. What has been argued is that with the emergence of new technologies is possible to obtain higher yields. However, what we have checked is that the research has reached a stage where progress in productivity levels is proving slow or stagnant. It was also observed that

BA

MT

498.3

1,672.3 100.0

29.8

Major producing states

Source: Conab - survey june/2014

National Production

COTTON LINT

Harvest Year2013/2014

(Thousand tons)%

939.4 56.2

GO 79.9 4.8

56.2

4.8

29.8

MATO GROSSO

GOIÁS

BAHIA

Total 1,517.6 90.7

Page 16: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

15

the projection for 2014/15, 2,143 thousand tons may not occur and that the tendency is to fall short, close to 2013/14 production of 2013/14, 1,672 thousand tons of cotton lint.

The consumption of this product in Brazil should grow at an annual rate lower than 1.0% in the next ten years, reaching a total of 939 thousand tons consumed in 2023/24. Exports are also forecast strong growth, 55.4% between 2013/14 a 2023/24

The report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA, 2014) indicates that Brazilian exports between 2013/14 and 2023/24 will more than double, with the country that should increase its exports in the next 10 years. Also according to this source, in a few years Brazil will overtake Central Asia as the third largest source of cotton for export. Brazil has exported to large number of countries, but the main importers in 2013 were South Korea, Indonesia, China, Argentina and Vietnam.

Page 17: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

16

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with Conab information.* Models used: Production- Space states. Consumption and exports – PRP

Table 4 –Production, Consumption and Export of Cot-ton Lint (thousand tons)

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.2013/14 1,672 - 900 - 575 -2014/15 2,143 2,517 904 1,000 607 9232015/16 1,900 2,322 908 1,044 639 1,0852016/17 1,719 2,148 912 1,078 671 1,2182017/18 2,099 2,558 916 1,108 702 1,3342018/19 2,271 2,813 920 1,134 734 1,4402019/20 2,072 2,622 924 1,159 766 1,5402020/21 2,135 2,689 928 1,182 798 1,6342021/22 2,411 3,004 932 1,203 830 1,7232022/23 2,426 3,051 936 1,223 862 1,8092023/24 2,350 2,981 939 1,243 893 1,892

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Production 40.5%Consumption 4.4%Exports 55.4%

Variation %

2013/14 to 2023/24

Page 18: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

17

c. Rice

Although the rice is a common culture in most of the country, most of the production occurs in 5 states - Rio Grande do Sul, with predominantly irrigated rice concentrates 65.8% of production in 2013/14, Santa Catarina , 8.7% of production, Mato Grosso, 5.2%, Maranhão,5.4 % and Tocantins ,4.4% of national production. In the Northeast, especially in the state of Ceará rice is irrigated and concentrated on irrigation projects. A small amount is also produced in the states crossed bythe São Francisco river pass, as Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas and Pernambuco and these areas also receive irrigation.

Fig. 3 – Production, Consumption and Exports of Cot-ton Lint

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

1,672   2,350  

900   939  

575  893  

0  

500  

1,000  

1,500  

2,000  

2,500  

3,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on  

Page 19: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

18

The projected production for 2023/24 is 13.6 million tons, and consumption of 12.2 million tons. We projected to increase 11.3% in rice production over the next 10 years. This increased production is expected to occur mainly through the growth of irrigated areas. The projected increase in production is apparently low, but it is equivalent to the projection of consumption over the next 10 years.

The relative stabilization of the projected consumption of rice is consistent with the data supply Conab in recent years, around 12 million tons in 2013/14 (Conab, 2014).

The estimates for the projection of rice planted area show that the area reduction will occur in the coming years. According to the projections it may fall of 2.4 million hectares in 2013/14 to 1.40 million hectares in 2023/24. According Conab technicians consulted, the area reduction is not likely to occur. The same is shared by researchers at

MARANHÃO

RS

SC

8.059.0

12,250.7 100.0

65.8

Major producing states

Source: Conab - survey june/2014

National Production

RICEHarvest Year

2013/2014(Thousand tons)

%

1.067.2 8.7

MA 658.4 5.4

MT 639.5 5.2

TO 543.7 4.4

5.2

65.8

8.7

4.4

5.4

RIO GRANDEDO SUL

SANTACATARINA

MATO GROSSO TOCANTINS

Total 10,967.8 89.5

Page 20: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

19

Embrapa Rice and Beans. In Rio Grande do Sul, which is now at 1.0 million hectares should remain in that number or even decrease because rice has had to compete with soybean and corn.

The new Brazilian Forest Code limits the incorporation of new areas and the opportunity for Highlands Rice for years to come is in the crop rotation, renovation, rehabilitation or renovation of degraded or even livestock grazing in the transition to agriculture (Santiago, Carlo . Embrapa, 2013).

The productivity should be the main variable in the behavior of the product in the coming years. The projection indicates a productivity of 5.5 tonnes per hectare, about 300 kg more than the current productivity of 5.2 tonnes per hectare. But rice is concentrated in areas of Rio Grande do Sul where the current yield is 7.5 tons per hectare (Conab, 2014).

The consumption of rice in the coming years is expected to grow at 0.2% per year. According to technicians of Embrapa, the projected consumption seems appropriate to the current reality, even if the calculations of apparent per capita consumption have shown declines in recent years. To change this long-term trend, only if Brazil can develop new ways to use and consumption of rice (made from grains of rice products, which depends on R & D and, especially industry, became interested in the subject, which did not can be seen today).

Page 21: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

20

Table 5 –Production, Consumption and Rice Imports (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information* Models used: Production, Consumption and Imports, PRP

Production 8.2%Consumption 2.0%Imports -32.9%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.2013/14 12,251 - 12,000 - 1,000 -2014/15 12,703 15,285 12,023 12,557 967 1,7692015/16 12,807 16,459 12,047 12,801 934 2,0692016/17 12,910 17,383 12,070 12,994 901 2,2912017/18 13,014 18,179 12,094 13,161 868 2,4732018/19 13,118 18,892 12,117 13,310 836 2,6292019/20 13,222 19,547 12,141 13,447 803 2,7682020/21 13,326 20,158 12,164 13,575 770 2,8922021/22 13,429 20,734 12,188 13,696 737 3,0062022/23 13,533 21,280 12,211 13,811 704 3,1112023/24 13,637 21,803 12,235 13,921 671 3,208

Production Consumption ImportsYear

11.3%

Page 22: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

21

d. Bean

The geographical distribution of the main producers of beans in the country can be seen on the map. The product is fairly distributed across several states, although the main are Paraná, Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso, which currently produce 74.9% of national production.

Such as rice, beans are part of the basic diet of Brazilians. It is the product that more has the production , a trend that should continue in the next years production. Imports are always to fi ll a small gap between production and consumption (Santiago, C. Embrapa, 2013, and Conab, 2014).

Fig. 4 - Production, Consumption and Rice Imports

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

12,251  13,637  

12,000   12,235  

1,000  

0  

2,000  

4,000  

6,000  

8,000  

10,000  

12,000  

14,000  

16,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Imports  

671

Page 23: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

22

PARANÁ

MATO GROSSO

GOIÁS

MINASGERAIS

PR

MG

871.2

3,713.9 100.0

23.5

Major producing states

Source: Conab - survey june/2014

National Production

BEANHarvest Year

2013/2014(Thousand tons)

%

596.0 16.0

MT 563.5 15.2

BA 301.3 8.1

GO 255.4 6.9

CE 194.8 5.2

16.0

8.1

5.2

23.5

15.2

6.9

BAHIA

CEARÁ

Total 2,782.2 74.9

Page 24: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

23

According to technicians of Embrapa Rice and Beans, each year increases the discussions on production focused exclusively on the domestic market.There are some varieties of beans that can be used for export. If this new opportunity consolidates the projection of production will have to be adjusted upward.

The variation designed for consumption is 3.6%, which is higher than the production variation. Annual average consumption has been 3.5 million tonnes, requiring small amounts of imports. If confirmed projections of production, should be no need to import beans in the coming years. Over the past five years, Brazil has imported annually between 180 000 and 300 000 tonnes of beans (Conab, 2014).

The opinions of Conab and Embrapa technicians is that there may be major changes in the beans in the coming years. Productivity is expected to increase from current levels as producers of soybeans and corn are producing beans destined for export to China, India and some African countries. The Northeast, although a large producer of this product has imported beans from other states in periods of drought. Mato Grosso has produced beans for export.

Some states such as São Paulo and Minas Gerais has been having problems with regards to pests and diseases that attack crops of this product and so far have struggled to adequately control these attacks.

Page 25: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

24

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 3,714 3,450 300

2014/15 3,179 3,835 3,463 3,897 307 436

2015/16 2,928 3,644 3,475 4,090 314 497

2016/17 3,268 3,990 3,488 4,240 322 545

2017/18 3,227 4,066 3,500 4,369 329 587

2018/19 3,036 3,949 3,513 4,484 336 625

2019/20 3,164 4,096 3,525 4,589 343 659

2020/21 3,205 4,193 3,538 4,687 350 692

2021/22 3,099 4,149 3,550 4,779 358 723

2022/23 3,129 4,209 3,563 4,866 365 752

2023/24 3,173 4,292 3,575 4,949 372 780

Production Consumption ImportsYear

Table 6 – Production, Consumption and Bean Imports (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information*Models used: To Production, ARMA Models , to Consumption and Imports, PRP

- - -

Production -14.6%Consumption 3.6%Imports 24.0%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

Page 26: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

25

Fig. 5 – Production, Consumption and Bean Imports

e. Corn

The national maize production in the country is relatively sparse. The main producing states, Mato Grosso, Paraná, Minas Gerais, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and Rio Grande do Sul should answer in 2013/14 by 70.0% of national production. But the major producing regions are South, the with 31.5% of the national production and Midwest with 42.0%. In South leadership is of Paraná, and in the Midwest, Mato Grosso. These are currently the main producers of corn in the country. But Minas Gerais, Goias and Rio Grande do Sul Minas also account for an important part of national production as shown on the map

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

3,714  

3,173  3,450  

3,575  

300   372  

0  500  

1,000  1,500  2,000  2,500  3,000  3,500  4,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Imports  

Page 27: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

26

The forecast for corn production in Brazil for 2013/14 is estimated at 77.9 million tonnes (Conab, 2014). For 2014/15 the projected production is between 80.7 and 93.9 million tons as the upper limit of the projection. But the tendency is the production lie nearest the projection. For 2023/24 production is projected 103.1 million tons.

As is well known, in Paraná and Mato Grosso, the biggest producers, soybean areas release space for planting corn. In Mato Grosso it is usual to plant soybeans around 15 September and harvest in January to then start the second maize crop. The limit for this planting is February because the risk of loss due the dry season are great if this period is exceeded.

The corn area will increase by 6.4% between 2013/14 and 2023/24, from 15.7 million hectares in 2013/14 to 16.7 million, reaching 22,1 million

MT

PR

16,839.3

77,887.1 100.0

21.6

Major producing states

Source: Conab - survey june/2014

National Production

CORNHarvest Year

2013/2014(Thousand tons)

%

15,295.4 19.6

MS 7,530.5 9.7

MG 6,956.5 8.9

RS 5,773.7 7.4

GO 7,489.2 9.6

SP 3,699.7 4.8

SC 3,485.0 4.5

BA 3,283.0 4.2

21.6

9.6

4.2

9.7

8.9

4.8

4.5

19.6

7.4RIO GRANDE

DO SUL

PARANÁ

MATO GROSSO

GOIÁS

MINASGERAIS

BAHIA

SÃO PAULO

MATO GROSSODO SUL

SANTACATARINA

Total 70,352.3 90.3

Page 28: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

27

hectares in 2023/24. There will be no need for new areas to expand this activity as soybean areas release the majority of the areas required by corn. The increase in projected area 6.4% is below the growing rate of the past 10 years, that was 25.5%. But the corn had in recent years high productivity gains resulting in less need for additional areas.

The domestic consumption of corn in 2013/14 represents 69.0 % of production should decrease to 62.2 %. Corn exports must pass 21 million tons in 2013/14 to 33.7 million tons in 2023/24. To maintain domestic consumption projected of 64.0 million tons and ensure a reasonable volume level of ending stocks and exports projected, the projected production shoult be of 103.0 million tons, sufficient to meet the demand in 2024. According to technicians working with this culture area should increase more than is being projected and perhaps get closer to its upper limit of growth (See Figure 8)

Page 29: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

28

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 77,887 53,818 21,0002014/15 80,717 93,896 54,876 56,652 22,806 30,2642015/16 83,462 100,811 55,868 58,892 25,001 35,1172016/17 86,773 107,583 56,868 60,927 25,910 37,1442017/18 88,118 110,940 57,899 62,859 26,790 39,2642018/19 91,516 117,488 58,936 64,675 28,018 41,7482019/20 93,193 120,947 59,967 66,396 29,192 44,0162020/21 96,528 126,846 61,000 68,055 30,298 46,1212021/22 98,138 129,980 62,034 69,665 31,425 48,2012022/23 101,497 135,617 63,068 71,234 32,565 50,2472023/24 103,121 138,603 64,102 72,770 33,698 52,237

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Table 7 – Production Consumption and Corn Export (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information* Models used: To production, Consumption and Exports, State – Space Models.

- - -

Production 32.4%Consumption 19.1%Exports 60.5%

2013/14 to 2023/24Variation %

Page 30: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

29

Fig. 6 – Corn Production

Fig. 7 – Corn Consumption

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

77,887  

103,121  

138,603  

0  20,000  40,000  60,000  80,000  

100,000  120,000  140,000  160,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

53,818  64,102  

72,770  

0  10,000  20,000  30,000  40,000  50,000  60,000  70,000  80,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

Page 31: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

30

Fig. 8 – Planted Area of Corn

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

22,149  

15,726  16,739  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Up  limit.   ProjecAons  

Projection Variation(%) 20013/14 a 2023/24

6,4 a 40,8% 6,4 to 40,8%

Page 32: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

31

f. Wheat

Wheat production in the country is concentrated in the South, and Rio Grande do Sul and Paraná are the major producers. In 2013/14 harvest, the forecast indicates that Paraná are responsible for 51.9% of the country’s production and Rio Grande do Sul by 40.4%. The participation of other states, is of the order of 7.7%. This participation is distributed between Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso do Sul.

Wheat production in 2013/14 crop is being estimated by Conab in 7.4 million tons; this is the largest crop that Brazil already had. The projected production for 2023/24 is 10.0 million tons, and consumption of 14.3 million tons in the same year. The domestic consumption of wheat in the country is expected to grow 17.4% between 2013/14 and 2023/2024.

RIO GRANDEDO SUL

PARANÁ

7,373.1 100,0

RS 2,978.9 40.4

PR 3,824.6 51.951.9

40.4

Major producing states

Source: Conab - survey june/2014

National Production

WHEATHarvest Year

2013/2014(Thousand tons)

%

Total 6,803.5 92.3

Page 33: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

32

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 7,373 12,192 5,5002014/15 7,635 10,519 12,405 13,443 5,478 7,2012015/16 7,897 11,975 12,617 14,086 5,456 7,8932016/17 8,158 13,154 12,830 14,628 5,433 8,4182017/18 8,420 14,188 13,042 15,119 5,411 8,8582018/19 8,682 15,131 13,255 15,577 5,389 9,2432019/20 8,944 16,008 13,468 16,011 5,367 9,5882020/21 9,205 16,836 13,680 16,428 5,345 9,9042021/22 9,467 17,625 13,893 16,830 5,322 10,1972022/23 9,729 18,381 14,105 17,221 5,300 10,4702023/24 9,991 19,111 14,318 17,602 5,278 10,728

Production Consumption ImportsYear

Table 8 – Production, Consumption and Imports of Wheat (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information.* Models used: To Production and Consiumptiion , State – Space model, and to Export, PRP model.

The domestic supply will require imports of 5.3 million tonnes in 2023/24. In recent years, imports has been set between 5.8 and 7.0 million tons, and the most frequent import volume has been 6 million tonnes with an outflow in nearly 2.4 billion dollars in 2013.

Although the increase in wheat production in coming years by more than 30%, Brazil should remain as one of the world’s largest importer. The USDA report estimated Brazilian wheat imports of 8 million tons in 2023/24 (USDA, 2014).

- - -

Production 35.5%Consumption 17.4%Imports -4.0%

2013/14 to 2023/24Variation %

Page 34: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

33

Fig. 9 - Production, Consumption and Import of Wheat

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

7,373   9,991  

12,192  14,318  

5,500   5,278  

0  2,000  4,000  6,000  8,000  

10,000  12,000  14,000  16,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Imports  

Page 35: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

34

Soybean production expected in the country in 2013/14 is 86.1 million tons Soybean production in Brazil is led by the states of Mato Grosso, with 31.4% of national production; Paraná with 17.1%, Rio Grande do Sul with 14.8%, and Goiás, 10.0%. But, as shown on the map, soybean production is also evolving into new areas in Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia, which in 2013/14 accounted for 10.1% of Brazilian production which corresponds to a production of 8.7 million tons of soybean. This is a region located in the center northeast of the country, which has shown strong potential for grain production, called Matopiba. Despite its deficiencies infrastructure, still attractive price land, the climate, the possibility of deploying large areas and favorable relief, have been several factors that have motivated investments in the region.

RIO GRANDEDO SUL

PARANÁ

BAHIAMATO GROSSO

MATO GROSSODO SUL

Goiás

MT

PR

27,001.6

86,052.2 100.0

31.4

Major producing states

Source: Conab - survey june/2014

National Production

SOYBEANHarvest Year

2013/2014(Thousand tons)

%

14,740.8 17.1

RS 12,734.3 14.8

GO 8,636.6 10.0

MS 6,148.0 7.1

BA 3,229.2 3.8

3.831.4

7.1

10.0

17.1

14.8

Total 72,490.5 84.2

g. Soybean Complex

Soybean

Page 36: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

35

The projection of soybeans for 2023/24 is 117.8 million tonnes. This number represents an increase of 36.9% over the production of 2013/14. But it is a percentage that is lower than the growth recorded in the last 10 years in Brazil, which was 64.5% (Conab, 2014).

Consumption projections indicate that there must be a large increase in demand for soybean in the international and domestic market. In this market, besides the demand for animal feed, is expected a strong increase in consumption of soybean for bio diesel production, estimated in 2014 by ABIOVE between 10.4 and 12 million tons. This variation depends on the scenario regarding the participation of soybean oil for biodiesel production (ABIOVE matching 05.19.14).

Domestic consumption of soybean is expected to reach 50.4 million tonnes by the end of the projection. Consumption is projected to increase 25.8% by 2023/24. This estimate is close to the growth observed in recent years by Conab of 23.0% within 6 years. There should be an additional consumption of soybean in relation to 2013/14 of around 10.0 million tonnes. As is well known, soybean is an essential component in the manufacture of animal feeds and is gaining importance in human nutrition.

The soybean area should increase 10.3 million hectares over the next 10 years, arriving in 2024 to 40.4 million hectares. It is a crop that will more expand area over the next decade. It represents an increase of 34.1% over the area with soybeans in 2013/14.

In the new areas of the Center Northeast of Brazil, comprising the region of Matopiba, the soybean area should expand greatly according to Conab technicians. This information goes in the same direction as the results obtained in this work. In the present work, the area of grains in this region should expand by 16.3% over the next 10 years. This equates to reach the region area of 8.4 million hectares, which at its upper limit can reach 10.9 million hectares.

In Paraná state, area can grow in the coming years taking areas of other cultures. In Mato Grosso expansion should occur over degraded pastures and new areas, but mostly the first areas. But the trend in Brazil is that the expansion of the area occurs mainly on natural pasture lands.

Exports of soybeans designed for 2023/2024 is 65.2 million tonnes, Representing an increase of 19.9 million tonnes for the quantity exported by Brazil in 2013/14.

Page 37: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

36

The expected change in 2024 relative to 2013/14 is an increase in volume of soybeans exports in the order of 44.0% . The soybean export projections in this report are very similar to USDA projections, released in February this year. They design 66.5 million of exports for soybeans at the end of the next decade. This estimate is almost the same as that of this report, 65.2 million tons in 2024.

Page 38: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

37

Table 9 – Production, Consumption and Soybean Export (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information.* Models used: To Production and Consiumptiion , State – Space model, and to Export, PRP model.

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 86,052 40,080 45,297

2014/15 89,831 98,215 41,233 45,698 47,292 52,768

2015/16 93,254 103,825 42,358 47,988 49,286 57,032

2016/17 96,377 108,549 43,391 49,739 51,281 60,767

2017/18 99,479 113,376 44,401 51,612 53,276 64,229

2018/19 102,555 117,921 45,414 53,329 55,270 67,517

2019/20 105,606 122,309 46,417 54,969 57,265 70,680

2020/21 108,660 126,624 47,420 56,583 59,260 73,750

2021/22 111,712 130,846 48,423 58,152 61,254 76,745

2022/23 114,761 134,999 49,425 59,688 63,249 79,679

2023/24 117,811 139,097 50,427 61,200 65,244 82,563

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Production 36.9%Consumption 25.8%Exports 44.0%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

- - -

Page 39: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

38

Fig. 10 – Soybean Production

Fig. 11 – Soybean Consumption

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

86,052  

117,811  

139,097  

0  20,000  40,000  60,000  80,000  

100,000  120,000  140,000  160,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

40,080  50,427  

61,200  

0  

10,000  

20,000  

30,000  

40,000  

50,000  

60,000  

70,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

Page 40: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

39

The expansion of soybean production in the country will give by the combination of area expansion and productivity. As production increases planned over the next 10 years is 36.9%, the expansion of the area is 34.1%. In recent years soybean productivity yield has remained stable at 2.7 tons per hectare, and that number is projected to be 3.0 tonnes per hectare in the next 10 years.

Soybean should expand through a combination of frontier expansion in regions where there is still available land, pasture land occupation and substituting orther crops where there is no land available for incorporation. But the trend in Brazil is that the expansion occurs mainly on natural pasture lands.

Figure 13 illustrates the projected area expansion in sugar cane and soybean, which are two activities that compete for the area in Brazil.

Together these two activities in the coming years should presentan expansion area of 12.6 million hectares, 10.3 million hectares of soybean and 2.3 million hectares of cane sugar.

The other crops should have little variation in area in the coming

Fig. 12 – Soybean Export

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

45,297  

65,244  

82,563  

0  10,000  20,000  30,000  40,000  50,000  60,000  70,000  80,000  90,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

Page 41: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

40

years. However, it is estimated that expansion should occur in areas of great productive potential, as areas of cerrado understood in what is now called Matopiba for understanding land located in the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia. Mato Grosso will lose strenghts in this process of expansion of new areas, mainly due to the price of land in this state that are more than double the price of crop land in the states of Matopiba (FGV-FGVDados). Because these new ventures regions include areas of great extent, the price of land is a decisive factor.

Fig. 13 – Area of Soybean and Sugar Cane

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa * Area with soybean and cane will grouth 12.6 million hectare**refers to sugar - cane intended to production of alcohol and sugar.

8,811     11.123    -­‐  13.838  

30,105  

40.357  -­‐  51.915  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 hectare  

Soybean   Sugar  cane**  

Soybean- Variation - 34,1 %

Sugar cane - Variation - 26,2 %

,

,

34.1 %

26.2 %

,

,

Page 42: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

41

Meal and Soybean Oil

Meal and soybean oil showed moderate dynamism of production in the coming years. The soybean meal production should increase by 25.1% and 25.9% oil. These percentages are slightly higher than what has been observed in the last decade for both products. However, consumption of meal will have stronger growth than soybean oil, 35.2% and 23.1%, respectively.

Exports of meal should increase 15.6% between 2014 and 2024 and 18.4% oil. Exports are presented in the coming years more dynamic domestic consumption in the case of soybean oil.

Page 43: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

42

Table 10 – Production, Consumption and Soybean Meal Export (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information* Models used: To Production, Consumption and Export, Space – state models.

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 28,105 - 14,100 - 13,579 -

2014/15 28,676 31,078 14,529 15,234 14,166 15,926

2015/16 30,079 33,173 15,046 16,085 14,389 17,103

2016/17 30,534 33,935 15,548 16,793 14,715 18,154

2017/18 31,041 34,918 16,019 17,463 14,783 18,821

2018/19 31,910 36,218 16,538 18,181 14,939 19,545

2019/20 32,562 37,158 17,049 18,851 15,128 20,230

2020/21 33,135 38,043 17,543 19,492 15,257 20,801

2021/22 33,856 39,082 18,050 20,143 15,394 21,358

2022/23 34,539 40,031 18,559 20,783 15,557 21,912

2023/24 35,168 40,919 19,061 21,407 15,701 22,422

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Production 25.1%Consumption 35.2%Exports 15.6%

2013/14 to 2023/24Variation %

Page 44: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

43

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information* Models Used: To Production, Consumption and Exports, State- Space Models.

Table 11 – Production, Consumption and Soybean Oil Export (thousand tons)

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 7,118 - 5,500 - 1,374 -

2014/15 7,353 8,125 5,566 5,911 1,530 2,119

2015/16 7,510 8,481 5,642 6,225 1,562 2,422

2016/17 7,706 8,827 5,755 6,564 1,598 2,686

2017/18 7,886 9,164 5,880 6,913 1,622 2,945

2018/19 8,066 9,472 6,016 7,258 1,631 3,164

2019/20 8,247 9,773 6,161 7,597 1,637 3,369

2020/21 8,425 10,064 6,309 7,928 1,637 3,556

2021/22 8,604 10,347 6,461 8,250 1,635 3,727

2022/23 8,783 10,624 6,616 8,563 1,631 3,887

2023/24 8,961 10,896 6,772 8,869 1,626 4,036

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Production 25.9%Consumption 23.1%Exports 18.4%

2013/14 to 2023/24Variation %

Page 45: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

44

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Fig. 14 – Production, Consumption and Export of Soy-bean Meal

Fig. 15 – Production, Consumption and Exports of Soybean Oil

bean Meal

28,105   35,168  

14,100  19,061  

13,579   15,701  

0  

5,000  

10,000  

15,000  

20,000  

25,000  

30,000  

35,000  

40,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Exports  

7,118  8,961  

5,500  6,772  

1,374   1,626  

0  1,000  2,000  3,000  4,000  5,000  6,000  7,000  8,000  9,000  

10,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Exports  

Page 46: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

45

The domestic consumption of soybean oil forecast for 2023/24 is estimated at 6.8 million tons. Represents around 75.6% of projected production. Most of the oil is intended for human consumption and another part has been used to produce Biodiesel. According to ABIOVE in 2014, the average use of soybean oil for biodiesel should be between 2.0 and 2.3 million tons. This represents between 28.0 and 32.3% of soybean oil in 2013/14 harvest.

For soybean meal, in the next decade, about 54.0% should be directed to domestic consumption, and 44.6% for exports.

We analyzed the data sent by ABIOVE (2014), at our request, in the form of comments to these projections, and it generally converge toward the results presented in this report.

Page 47: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

46

h. Coffee

Coffee production has been showing unusual behavior in2014. Though a period called the High, the expected production this year is supposed to be lower than last year. This crop has a cycle called “ bienalidade “ where years there has been a high production and low production the next. Due to weather problems that occurred earlier this year affecting the main producing regions, the harvest expected in 2014 should be equal to or less than last year. Estimates for 2014 indicate a harvest of 46.9 million 60-kg bags, while last year was 49.2 million bags (DCAF-CONAB-ABIC-MDI / SECEX-OIC-CEPEA / ESALQ, BM & F, 2014 )

MG

ES

1,511.8

2,818.2 100.0

53.6

Major producing states

Source: IBGE - survey - june/2014

Produção Nacional

COFFEEHarvest Year

2013/2014(Thousand tons)

%

733.3 26.0

53.6

26.0

MINASGERAIS

ESPIRITOSANTO

Total 2,245.1 79.7

Page 48: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

47

The projections show that the related production in 2023/24 should rise 30.6% compared to 2013/14. This change is equivalent to an annual growth rate of 2.5%. Consumption is estimated to grow 28.9% by 2023/24, the result of an annual growth rate of 2.4%. The consumption in Brazil has grown to an average annual rate of 4.8% according to the International Coffee Organization, OIC, while the world average has been 2.7% per year. The latest estimates of the Ministry of Agriculture indicate an average annual rate of per capita consumption in Brazil of 5.7% per year in the period 2003-2014 (MAPA / DCAF, ABIC, Conab, 2014).

Coffee exports are projected for 2023/24 at 40.0 million bags of 60 kg. This projected volume represents an increase of 24.0% compared to the exports of 2013/14, representing an average annual rate of 2.2%. It is expected that the country will continue as the world’s largest producer and leading exporter as well as keep the usual buyers and valued partners in 129 countries in 2013. U.S., Germany, Japan and Italy imported 62.7% of the volume exported by Brazil in 2013.

Page 49: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

48

i. Milk

Milk was considered a product that has high growth potential. The production is expected to grow at an annual rate between 2.6% and 3.4%. This corresponds to a production of 44.7 billion liters of raw milk at the end of the period of the projections, 29.8% higher than the production year 2013/14.

Table 12 – Production, Consumption and Exports of Coffee (million bags)

Source: AGE/Mapa e and SGE/Embrapa with Mapa/SPAE/DCAF and CONAB Information* Models Used: To production, consumption and Exports, State- Space Models.

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 47 - 20 - 32 -2014/15 48 48 21 21 33 392015/16 51 62 21 22 33 412016/17 53 67 22 23 34 422017/18 54 68 22 24 35 442018/19 55 72 23 24 36 452019/20 56 73 24 25 37 472020/21 58 76 24 26 37 482021/22 59 77 25 27 38 502022/23 60 80 25 27 39 512023/24 61 82 26 28 40 52

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Production 30.6%Consumption 28.9%Exports 24.0%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

Page 50: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

49

Tabela 13 - Production, Consumption and Exports of Milk (million liters)

Source: AGE/Mapa e and SGE/Embrapa with IBGE/MDIC/Embrapa Gado de Leite information.* Models used: To Production and Consumption, ARMA model, to Imports and Exports, PRP models.

According to technicians of Embrapa Dairy Cattle, the projected growth rates for production should be slightly above the projected in this report. According to them the milk production in Brazil rose more than 4.0% per year in recent years.

- - -

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 34,408 36,298 1,057 1382014/15 36,322 37,897 37,310 40,069 1,047 2,820 142 6572015/16 36,473 38,885 38,302 41,810 1,037 3,209 147 7772016/17 38,377 41,016 39,290 43,420 1,028 3,535 152 8792017/18 38,523 41,826 40,278 44,948 1,018 3,821 157 9702018/19 40,425 43,927 41,265 46,419 1,008 4,079 161 1,0522019/20 40,569 44,623 42,253 47,849 999 4,316 166 1,1282020/21 42,470 46,696 43,240 49,246 989 4,535 171 1,2002021/22 42,613 47,315 44,228 50,617 979 4,740 176 1,2672022/23 44,514 49,368 45,215 51,967 970 4,934 180 1,3302023/24 44,657 49,933 46,203 53,297 960 5,118 185 1,391

ExportsProduction ConsumptionYear

Imports

Production 29.8%Consumption 27.3%Imports -9.2%Exports 34.7%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

- - - -

Page 51: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

50

Fig. 16 – Milk Production

Fig. 17 – Production and Consumption of Milk.

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

34,408  

44,657  

49,933  

0  

10,000  

20,000  

30,000  

40,000  

50,000  

60,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

34,408  

44,657  36,298  

46,203  

0  

10,000  

20,000  

30,000  

40,000  

50,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on  

Page 52: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

51

Fig. 18 – Import and Export of Milk

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

1,057  960  

138   185  

0  

200  

400  

600  

800  

1,000  

1,200  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Imports   Exports  

Page 53: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

52

j. Sugar

The estimates obtained by AGE and SGE for Brazilian sugar production indicate an average annual growth rate of 3.3% in the 2013/2014 to 2023/2024 period. This rate should lead to a production of 52.9 million tons in 2024. Such production corresponds to an increase of 39.7% compared to 2013/14. These projections may be affected if the current situation is maintened where the prospects of the sugar and alcohol sector are not favorable.

Investments have not been made in new units, several production units have paralyzed its activities over the past 3 seasons and many companies are indebted (Mapa / Agroenergia, 2014).

Consumption is expected to grow at an annual rate between 2.4 and 3.3%, thus following the production of the country, but putting the consuption at a level slightly above the national production, it will require some import.

Page 54: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

53

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with Mapa /SPAE/DCAA; Mapa /SRI and CONAB. information* Models used: To Production and Exports, Space – State model, and to Consumption, ARMA model.

Table14 – Production, Consumption and Sugar Exports (thousand tons)

The projected rates for exports and domestic consumption for the next 10 years are, respectively, 3.7% and 2.3% per year. For exports, the forecast for 2023/2024 is a volume of 38.8 million tonnes.

- - -

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 37,878 12,233 27,154

2014/15 40,330 44,074 12,261 13,640 27,824 32,552

2015/16 41,265 45,774 12,694 14,300 29,207 34,896

2016/17 42,937 48,304 12,963 14,881 30,352 37,128

2017/18 44,264 50,305 13,299 15,442 31,577 39,208

2018/19 45,749 52,415 13,607 15,970 32,775 41,198

2019/20 47,163 54,394 13,927 16,485 33,982 43,122

2020/21 48,608 56,365 14,242 16,983 35,186 44,993

2021/22 50,040 58,288 14,559 17,471 36,391 46,821

2022/23 51,478 60,190 14,875 17,949 37,596 48,614

2023/24 52,913 62,066 15,192 18,419 38,801 50,378

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Production 39.7%

Consumption 24.2%

Exports 42.9%

2013/14 to 2023/24Variation %

- - -

Page 55: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

54

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Fig. 19 – Production, Consumption and Sugar Exports

Fig. 20 – Sugar Production

37,878   52,913  

12,233   15,192  

27,154  

0  

10,000  

20,000  

30,000  

40,000  

50,000  

60,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Exports  

37,878  

52,913  

62,066  

0  

10,000  

20,000  

30,000  

40,000  

50,000  

60,000  

70,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

38.801

Page 56: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

55

k. Orange and Orange Juice

The orange production should increase from 16.3 million tons in 2013/14 crop to 17.5 million tonnes in 2023/24. This variation corresponds to an annual growth rate of 0.7%.

The area planted with orange should be reduced in the coming years. It should move from the current 717 thousand hectares hectares to 627 thousand. This indicates an annual reduction in the growth rate of 1.3% per year.

Brazil is expected to export 2.6 million tonnes of orange juice at the end of the projection period. But that number may reach, at its upper limit, to 3.2 million tonnes of juice. Trade restrictions in the form of barriers to trade are the main limiting factor for the expansion of the orange juice.

Fig. 21 – Sugar Exports

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

27,154  

38,801  

50,378  

0  

10,000  

20,000  

30,000  

40,000  

50,000  

60,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

Page 57: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

56

Table 15- Production of Orange and Exports of Orange Juice (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with IBGE and SECEX/MDIC information* Models used: To Production, PRP model, and to Exports, Space – States model.

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 16,333 - 2,094 -2014/15 16,452 19,051 2,179 2,4482015/16 16,571 20,247 2,215 2,5372016/17 16,689 21,191 2,272 2,6312017/18 16,808 22,007 2,320 2,7152018/19 16,927 22,739 2,372 2,7992019/20 17,046 23,413 2,423 2,8802020/21 17,165 24,042 2,474 2,9592021/22 17,283 24,635 2,525 3,0362022/23 17,402 25,200 2,575 3,1122023/24 17,521 25,741 2,626 3,187

Production ExportsYear

Production 7.3%Exports 25.4%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

Page 58: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

57

Fig. 22 – Orange Production and Orange Juice Export

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

16,333  17,521  

2,094   2,626  

0  

4,000  

8,000  

12,000  

16,000  

20,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Exports  

Page 59: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

58

i. Meat

Before presenting the projections of meat, we seek to illustrate the current distribution of cattle in Brazil, with respect to the number of animals slaughtered in 2013. Slaughtered this year were 34.4 million head across the country, and Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Goiás, Para and Rondonia, leading the slaughter, with 72.0% of slaughters in the country.

MT

MS

5,837,857

34,411,857 100.0

17.0

Major producing states

Source: IBGE - quarterly survey of slaughtered animals - march/2014

National Production

BOVINES

Slaughtered Animals 2013/14(head)

%

4,120,813 12.0

SP 3,548,939 10.3

GO 3,466,231 10.1

PA 2,447,439 7.1

MG 3,032,618 8.8

RO 2,289,653 6.7

RS 1,920,455 5.6

PR 1,424,743 4.1

BA 1,309,373 3.8

TO 1,195,180 3.5

17.0

6.7

7.1

10.1

3.5 3.8

12.0

8.8

10.3

4.1

5.6RIO GRANDE

DO SUL

RONDÔNIA

MATO GROSSO

PARÁ

GOIÁS

MINASGERAIS

BAHIA

SÃO PAULO

MATO GROSSODO SUL

TOCANTINS

Total 30,593,301 88.9

Page 60: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

59

Projections of meat for Brazil show that this sector should present strong growth in the coming years. Among meat, the projecting higher growth rates of production in the period 2014-2024 are chicken, which is expected to grow annually at 3.1%, and swine, whose projected growth for this period is 2.8% per year. The beef production has a projected growth of 1.9% per year, which also represents a relatively high value because it can supply domestic consumption and exports.

The total meat production will increase from 26.0 million tons in 2014 to 33.8 million in 2024, an increase of 30.0%.

Page 61: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

60

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2014 9,753 3,553 12,691

2015 9,762 10,799 3,666 4,067 13,081 14,122

2016 10,309 11,921 3,778 4,346 13,519 14,620

2017 10,632 12,573 3,891 4,586 13,972 15,571

2018 10,451 12,661 4,004 4,806 14,432 16,090

2019 10,589 13,091 4,116 5,013 14,894 16,931

2020 11,027 13,600 4,229 5,212 15,358 17,445

2021 11,105 13,699 4,342 5,403 15,822 18,225

2022 11,159 13,799 4,454 5,589 16,286 18,734

2023 11,615 14,314 4,567 5,771 16,751 19,474

2024 11,975 14,707 4,680 5,948 17,216 19,979

BEEF PORK CHICKEN Year

Table 16– Meat Production (thousand tons)

Source:a AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB. information* Models used: To Beef, ARMA model, to Pork, PRP models and to Chicken, State - Space.

- - -

Beef 22.8%Pork 31.7%Chicken 35.7%

Variation % 2014 to 2024

Page 62: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

61

Fig. 23- Beef Production

Fig. 24 – Pork Production

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

9,753  11,975  

14,707  

0  2,000  4,000  6,000  8,000  

10,000  12,000  14,000  16,000  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec3on   Up  limit.  

3,553  4,680  

5,948  

0  1,000  2,000  3,000  4,000  5,000  6,000  7,000  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec3on   Up  limit.  

Page 63: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

62

Projections show the consumption preferences of Brazilian consumers for chicken. The projected annual growth for the consumption of chicken is 2.9% in the period 2014-2024. This is an increase of 33.1% in consumption for the next 10 years. Pork takes second place in consumption growth at an annual rate of 2.6% in the coming years. In the lower level of growth is located if the projection of beef consumption 1.5% per year next ten years.

Fig. 25- Chicken Production

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

12,691  

17,216  

19,979  

0  

5,000  

10,000  

15,000  

20,000  

25,000  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec3on   Up  limit.  

Page 64: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

63

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB Information* Models: To Beef, ARMA Model, Pork and Chicken, PRP

Table 17 – Meat Consumption (thousand tons)

Beef 15.6%Pork 29.1%Chicken 33.1%

2014 to 2024

Variation %

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.2014 7,744 - 3,032 - 8,689 -2015 7,615 8,332 3,120 4,750 8,976 9,6152016 7,866 8,880 3,209 5,513 9,263 10,1662017 8,089 9,198 3,297 6,119 9,551 10,6562018 7,992 9,189 3,385 6,644 9,838 11,1152019 8,082 9,399 3,474 7,117 10,125 11,5532020 8,421 9,752 3,562 7,553 10,412 11,9762021 8,501 9,841 3,650 7,961 10,699 12,3892022 8,502 9,906 3,738 8,347 10,987 12,7922023 8,759 10,230 3,827 8,715 11,274 13,1892024 8,953 10,451 3,915 9,068 11,561 13,580

BEEF PORK CHICKENYear

Page 65: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

64

Regarding exports, the projections indicate high growth rates for the three types of meat analyzed. Estimates project a favorable environment for Brazilian exports. The chicken and pork lead the annual growth rates of exports in the coming years - the annual rate provided for chicken is 3.8% and for pork 3.9%.

Exports of beef should be located on an annual average of 3.4%. Meat exports has led to numerous countries. In 2013 the beef was destinated to 143 countries, with the main Hong Kong; chicken was destinated for 144 countries, with Saudi Arabia the main buyer and fi nally the pork had 72 destination countries, whose main Russia. The expectation is that these markets are increasingly consolidate so that the projections are feasible.

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Fig. 26 – Meat Consumption

7,744  8,953  

3,032   3,915  

8,689  

11,561  

0  

2,000  

4,000  

6,000  

8,000  

10,000  

12,000  

14,000  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

Beef   Pork   Chicken  

Page 66: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

65

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2014 2,068 534 4,0022015 2,143 2,515 559 700 4,181 4,6742016 2,223 2,861 584 783 4,323 4,8872017 2,305 3,165 609 853 4,527 5,3842018 2,388 3,435 634 916 4,680 5,6132019 2,471 3,682 659 974 4,890 6,0542020 2,555 3,910 684 1,029 5,046 6,2762021 2,638 4,125 709 1,082 5,258 6,6792022 2,722 4,330 734 1,133 5,415 6,8932023 2,805 4,526 759 1,182 5,627 7,2712024 2,889 4,715 784 1,230 5,784 7,478

BEEF PORK POLTRYYear

Table 18 – Meat Export (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with CONAB information.*Models used: To Beef and Chicken meat, State – Space models, to Pork, PRP

- - -

Beef 39.7%Pork 46.9%Poltry 44.5%

Variation %

2014 to 2024

Page 67: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

66

Fig. 27 – Beef Export

Fig. 28 – Export of Pork

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

2,068  2,889  

4,715  

0  500  

1,000  1,500  2,000  2,500  3,000  3,500  4,000  4,500  5,000  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec3on   Up  limit.  

534  784  

1,230  

0  200  400  600  800  

1,000  1,200  1,400  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec3on   Up  limit.  

Page 68: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

67

m. Pulp and Paper

Forest products represent the fourth rank in the value of exports of brazilian agribusiness, below the soybean complex, meat and sugar and alcohol complex. In 2013 the value of exports of forest products was $ 9.64 billion, and pulp and paper accounted for 74.3% of export value (Mapa / Agrostat, 2014). Pulp and paper and wood and articles thereof comprise this segment of agribusiness.

Fig. 29 – Export of Chicken

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

4,002  

5,784  

7,478  

0  1,000  2,000  3,000  4,000  5,000  6,000  7,000  8,000  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec3on   Up  limit.  

Page 69: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

68

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 15,736 6,327 9,853

2014/15 16,173 17,106 6,392 6,862 10,240 11,233

2015/16 16,675 17,952 6,531 7,034 10,621 11,916

2016/17 17,183 18,681 6,654 7,224 11,022 12,527

2017/18 17,651 19,410 6,759 7,356 11,403 13,117

2018/19 18,156 20,116 6,889 7,531 11,794 13,694

2019/20 18,640 20,789 7,001 7,678 12,183 14,248

2020/21 19,128 21,459 7,120 7,829 12,569 14,794

2021/22 19,622 22,113 7,241 7,984 12,959 15,329

2022/23 20,108 22,755 7,356 8,129 13,347 15,855

2023/24 20,599 23,392 7,476 8,279 13,735 16,375

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Table 19 – Production, Consumption and Export of Pulp (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with BRACELPA information.*Models used: Production, Consumption amd Exports, Space – States model.

- - -

Production 30.9%Consumption 18.2%Exports 39.4%

Variation % 2013/14 to 2023/24

Page 70: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

69

Fig. 31 - Production, Consumption and Pulp Export

Fig. 30 - Pulp Production

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

15,736  

20,599  

23,392  

0  

5,000  

10,000  

15,000  

20,000  

25,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

15,736  

20,599  

6,327   7,476  

9,853  13,735  

0  

5,000  

10,000  

15,000  

20,000  

25,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Exports  

Page 71: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

70

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2013/14 10,759 10,125 1,937

2014/15 10,992 11,237 10,333 10,820 1,995 2,257

2015/16 11,267 11,565 10,598 11,243 2,055 2,470

2016/17 11,516 11,848 10,863 11,595 2,079 2,576

2017/18 11,776 12,136 11,102 11,923 2,122 2,712

2018/19 12,035 12,429 11,377 12,267 2,142 2,782

2019/20 12,289 12,704 11,601 12,562 2,190 2,897

2020/21 12,553 13,000 11,881 12,905 2,213 2,961

2021/22 12,805 13,269 12,102 13,188 2,261 3,068

2022/23 13,070 13,564 12,385 13,529 2,284 3,128

2023/24 13,320 13,830 12,605 13,805 2,332 3,229

Production Consumption ExportsYear

Table 20 – Production, Consumption and Paper Export (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with BRACELPA Information* Models used:To Production, Consumption and Export, State – Space Models.

- - -

Production 23.8%Consumption 24.5%Exports 20.4%

2013/14 to 2023/24

Variation %

Page 72: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

71

Fig. 32 – Paper Production

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

10,759  

13,320  

13,830  

0  2,000  4,000  6,000  8,000  

10,000  12,000  14,000  16,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Projec4on   Up  limit.  

Page 73: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

72

With regard to the paper, to supply domestic consumption growth of 2.2% annually over the next 10 years, and 1.8% of exports, it will be necessary to expand production faster than the projected rate, which is 2.2 % per year until 2023/2024. According to Bracelpa technicians production and paper consumption have historically accompanied the growth of GDP. Although the paper can fi nd some demand problem, the projected growth in this report for the production seems small. For cellulose, the projection indicates that would be possible production can meet the growth in domestic consumption and exports of the sector.

Fig. 33 – Production, Consumption and Paper Export

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

10,759  

13,320  

10,125  12,605  

1,937   2,332  

0  

2,000  

4,000  

6,000  

8,000  

10,000  

12,000  

14,000  

2013

/14  

2014

/15  

2015

/16  

2016

/17  

2017

/18  

2018

/19  

2019

/20  

2020

/21  

2021

/22  

2022

/23  

2023

/24  

thou

sand

 tons  

Produc4on   Consump4on   Exports  

Page 74: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

73

n. Tobacco

The inclusion of the projections of some variables related to Tobacco is justified by the importance of the product in the Brazilian trade balance and income formation in the producing regions.

Its production occurs mainly in Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and Paraná. In 2014, these three states have planted an area of 392 thousand hectares, a total of 417 thousand hectares of land. In Northeast Brazil, there is some production in Alagoas and Bahia . In 2013, tobacco and its products have generated export revenues of $ 3.27 billion.

The projected production for 2023/2024 is 1,060 tons. The projected area is 472 thousand hectares, obtained through an annual growth of 1.2% from 2013/14 until the end of the projections

Page 75: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

74

Table 21- Tobacco Production

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with IBGE information* Models used: To production, State - Space.

.

Projection Up limit.

2013/14 8652014/15 890 1,0792015/16 904 1,0932016/17 929 1,1972017/18 943 1,2112018/19 968 1,2962019/20 982 1,3102020/21 1,007 1,3852021/22 1,021 1,3992022/23 1,046 1,4692023/24 1,060 1,483

ProductionYear

-

Production 22.6%

Variation %

2013/14 to 2023/24

Page 76: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

75

o. Fruits

Among the fruits analyzed in this study, banana is the most widespread throughout the country. But 67.8% of production is in the states of São Paulo, Bahia, Minas Gerais, Santa Catarina, Ceará and Pará. Apple has its production located in Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina and grape in Rio Grande do Sul, Pernambuco and Sao Paulo.

The fruits have been growing in importance in the country, both domestically and internationally. In 2013, the export value of fresh fruit was U.S. $ 878.0 million, slightly below the value exported in 2012, of $ 910 million (Agrostat / Mapa, 2014). Grapes, mangoes and melons are the fastest growing exports in terms of value. As can be seen in the maps of location, banana is the most widespread in the country, while apples and grapes have their more restricted to South and Northeast regions of production.

Page 77: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

76

RS

SC

687,448

1,271,014 100.0

54.1

Source: IBGE - Systematic Survey of Agricultural Production - March / 2014

APPLE %

530,601 41.7 41.7

54.1

SANTACATARINA

RIO GRANDEDO SUL

Total 1,218,049 95.8

Major producing states

National Production

Harvest Year2013/2014

(Thousand tons)

RIO GRANDEDO SUL

RS

PE

759,942

1,360.608 100.0

55.9

Source: IBGE - Systematic Survey of Agricultural Production - March / 2014

GRAPE %

236,767 17.4

SP 158,781 11.7

PR 79,052 5.8

SC 52,083 3.8

BA 56,944 4.2

4.2

17.4

11.7

5.8

3.8

55.9

BAHIA

PARANÁ

PERNAMBUCO

SANTACATARINA

SÃO PAULO

Total 1,343,569 98.7

Major producing states

National Production

Harvest Year2013/2014

(Thousand tons)

Page 78: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

77

Due to limited data, the projections were restricted to changing production and planted are of grape, apple and banana area. Unlike the orange area which is relatively significant, these fruits have much more restricted areas, and, as is the case of the grape which are cultivated under irrigation and high technological level. Among the three fruits, bananas are the one with the largest area.

The projections of production until 2023/2024, show that the largest expansion will occur in apple production, 2.6% growth per year, followed by grapes, 1.9% per year for the banana, 0.9% per year . A joint production of apples, grapes and bananas should represent 4.0 million tons in 2023/24, representing an increase of 21.7% over 2014.

SP

BA

1,191,547

7,146,788 100.0

16.7

Source: IBGE - Systematic Survey of Agricultural Production - March / 2014

BANANA %

1,160,854 16.2

MG 764,030 10.7

SC 649,609 9.1

CE 501,857 7.0

PA 576,154 8.1

PB 389,337 5.4

PR 269,075 3.8

ES 262,711 3.7

8.1

16.2

10.7

3.7

7.0

5.4

16.7

3.8

9.1

PARÁ

MINASGERAIS

BAHIA

PARANÁ

ESPÍRITOSANTO

PERNAMBUCO

CEARÁ

SANTACATARINA

SÃO PAULO

Total 5,765,174 80.7

Major producing states

National Production

Harvest Year2013/2014

(Thousand tons)

Page 79: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

78

Table 22- Fruit Production (thousand tons)

Fig. 34- Fruit Production (thousand tons)

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa with IBGE information.* Models used: Banana, PRP and to Apple and Grapes, State Space model

Fonte: AGE/Mapa e SGE/Embrapa

Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit. Projection Up limit.

2014 701 - 1,271 - 1,361 -2015 707 764 1,306 1,488 1,413 1,6052016 714 793 1,344 1,560 1,424 1,6472017 720 818 1,381 1,638 1,459 1,7332018 726 839 1,418 1,707 1,483 1,7882019 733 859 1,456 1,774 1,513 1,8522020 739 878 1,493 1,838 1,539 1,9072021 746 895 1,530 1,900 1,567 1,9632022 752 912 1,568 1,961 1,595 2,0152023 758 928 1,605 2,020 1,622 2,0672024 765 944 1,642 2,078 1,650 2,117

BANANAS (thousand bunche)

APPLE GRAPE

Year

701   765  

1,271  

1,642  1,361  

1,650  

0  200  400  600  800  

1,000  1,200  1,400  1,600  1,800  

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023

 

2024

 

thou

sand

 tons  

BANANAS  (thousand  bunche)   APPLE   GRAPE  

Page 80: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

79

5. RESULTS OF REGIONAL OUTLOOK

Regional projections were made with the objective of identifying possible trends of selected products in major producing regions, and also show the predictions of a slightly more disaggregated. They are divided into two parts: regional projections of consolidated areas, and areas of recent expansion, located in central Brazil, and part of the Northeast. They are: Rice in Rio Grande do Sul; Corn in Mato Grosso, Paraná, Minas Gerais; Soybean in Mato Grosso, Rio Grande do Sul and Paraná; Wheat, Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul; and sugar cane in São Paulo, Paraná, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais and Goiás. Was included, the area and production projections for the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia, called MATOPIBA.

The projections of these regions were also made to some municipalities in these localities, selected according to their importance in the production of grains.

Regional projections were only for production and planted area because there aren`t more detailed information such as for the national projections.

Page 81: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

80

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa * Located in the Center – Northeast of Brazil and formed by the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí, Bahia.

Table 23 – Regional Projections - 2013/2014 to 2023/2024 Selected States

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

RS 8,434 10.540 25.0 1,114 1,178 5.8

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

GO 69,307 96,918 39.8 859 1,195 39.1

MG 76,741 109,035 42.1 953 1,322 38.7

MT 19,153 25.080 30.9 280 383 36.7

PR 49,227 65,742 33.5 658 878 33.4

SP 404,680 504,406 24.6 5,046 6,395 26.7

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

MG 6,957 9,154 31.6 1,325 1,234 -6.9

MT 16,839 27,316 62.2 3.250 4,848 49.2

PR 15,295 19,652 28.5 2,575 2,631 2.2

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

BA 3,229 4,388 35.9 1,313 1,789 36.2

MT 27,002 38,035 40.9 8,616 12,204 41.6

PR 14,741 19,756 34.0 5,019 6,527 30.0

RS 12,734 16,256 27.7 4.940 5,609 13.6

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

PR 3,825 5,137 30.3 1,323 1,497 13.1

RS 2,979 3,755 26.1 1,103 1,341 21.6

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

RS 760 922 21.3 50 56 11.1

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

MATOPIBA* 18,623 22,607 21.4 7,259 8.440 16.3

Production (Thousand tons) Planted Area (Thousand ha)

Wheat - Thousand Tons Thousand hectares

Grapes - Thousand Tons Thousand hectares

Grains - Thousand Tons Thousand hectares

RICE - Thousand Tons Thousand hectares

Sugar cane - Thousand Tons Thousand hectares

Corn - Thousand Tons Thousand hectares

Soybean - Thousand Tons Thousand hectares

,

Page 82: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

81

Regional projections show that Rio Grande do Sul should continue leading the production and expansion of rice in Brazil in the coming years. The production of the state that is in 2013/2014, 65.8% of the national rice production must increase production in the coming years in 25.0% and 5.8% in area.

The production of sugar cane must present expansion in all states considered. The greatest expansion of production must occur in Minas Gerais, Goiás and Paraná. In these states sugar cane should expand by reducing area of other crops and also in pastures. Sao Paulo, the leader of national production, should have a production increase of approximately 24.6% over the next decade. To meet this growing area in the state should increase by 26.7% at the end of the period of projections. Projections indicate that only in Minas Gerais production the increase will occur by gains in productivity. In the other the expected growth in production will be done mainly by the increase in area.

Mato Grosso should lead in the coming years the growth of corn production. The projected increase for the next decade is 62.2%, while the area is expected to increase 49.2%. The available information indicates that increased corn production should occur primarily through the second corn crop that has achieved amazing results

Corn must suffer in the coming years 6.9% decrease in the area in Minas Gerais. It is possible that this should occur due to the expansion of sugar cane in the state and also the soybean.

Mato Grosso and Bahia should lead the increase in soybean production in the coming years, increasing by 40.9% and 35.9%, respectively, soybean should increase production, without any reduction of area in any of the analyzed states.

The projections show that the wheat production increases should be similar in Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul, about 30.0% over the next 10 years and 26.1% for Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul, respectively. No reduction in wheat area is expected to occur, and the largest increase should occur in Rio Grande do Sul

The region formed by the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia, known as MATOPIBA has a different growth dynamics. Hence the interest in presenting the results of the main projections. Its growth has been extraordinary.

The latest survey of IBGE (2011) on the municipal GDP shows that these municipalities have pulled the growth of the states where they are located. Its growth has been much higher than the growth of the state

Page 83: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

82

and national average.These four states must reach a grain production of 22.6 million

tons over the next 10 years in a planted area of 8.4 million hectares in 2023/2024 but which could reach 10.9 million hectares at its upper bound to the end of the next decade.

The areas that have been settled in these states have some essential features for modern agriculture. Are fl at and extensive, potentially productive soils, water availability, and climate conducive to long days and high intensity of sunshine. The major limitation, however are precarious logistics, especially inland transport, port, communication, and some areas lack of fi nancial services.

Fig. 35 – Grains Projections - MaToPiBa

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

18,623  16,647  

Produc0on  (thousand  tonnes)  

22,607  

7,259   7,245  

Planted  Area  (thousand  hectares)  

8,440  

0  

5,000  

10,000  

15,000  

20,000  

25,000  

30,000  

2013/14   2014/15   2015/16   2016/17   2017/18   2018/19   2019/20   2020/21   2021/22   2022/23   2023/24  

Page 84: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

83

Table 24 – Projections of MATOPIBA (*) 2013/2014 to 2023/2024

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa * Located in the Center – Northeast of Brazil and formed by the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí, Bahia.

MA

TO

PI

BA

Balsas

Urucuí

Bom Jesus

Formosa doRio Preto

Luiz EduardoMagalhães

Barreiras

Pedro Afonso

Campos Lindos

CerradoBrazilianSavannah

2013/14 2023/24 Var. % 2013/14 2023/24 Var. %

18,623 22,607 21.4 7,259 8,440 16.3

Balsas - MA 464 682 46.9 150 217 45.0

Campos Lindos - TO 185 275 48.9 58 85 48.5

Uruçuí - PI 273 372 36.3 99 147 48.1

Barreiras - BA 353 363 2.9 127 149 17.3

Formosa do Rio Preto - BA 1,532 3,767 145.8 309 466 50.9

São Desidério - BA 829 1,200 44.7 264 275 4.1

Soybean – Selected Municipalities- Thousand tons thousand hectares

Grains

Production (thousand tons) Planted Area (thousand hectares)

Page 85: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

84

6. SUMMARY OF MAIN RESULTS

The most dynamic products in agribusiness should be cotton lint, chicken, cellulose, sugar, soybean, pork, wheat and sugarcane. These products are those that indicate greater potential for production growth in the coming years.

Page 86: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

85

Table 25 – Brazil - Production Results 2013/14 to 2023/24

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa Note: Sugar Cane refers to the sugar cane intended to alcohol and sugar production

Rice thousand tons 12,251 13,637 to 21,803 11.3 to 78.0

Bean thousand tons 3,714 3,173 to 4,292 -14.6 to 15.6

Corn thousand tons 77,887 103,121 to 138,603 32.4 to 78.0

Soybean thousand tons 86,052 117,811 to 139,097 36.9 to 61.6

Soybean Meal thousand tons 28,105 35,168 to 40,919 25.1 to 45.6

Soybean Oil thousand tons 7,118 8,961 to 10,896 25.9 to 53.1

Wheat thousand tons 7,373 9,991 to 19,111 35.5 to 159.2

Chicken thousand tons 12,691 17,216 to 19,979 35.7 to 57.4

Beef thousand tons 9,753 11,975 to 14,707 22.8 to 50.8

Pork thousand tons 3,553 4,680 to 5,948 31.7 to 67.4

Coffee million sc 47 61 to 82 29.8 to 74.5

Milk Million liters 34,408 44,657 to 49,933 29.8 to 45.1

Manioc Thousand tons 22,655 21,770 to 32,431 -3.9 to 43.2

Potatoes Thousand tons 3,711 4,406 to 4,831 18.7 to 30.2

Cotton lint Thousand tons 1,672 2,350 to 2,981 40.5 to 78.3

Sugar Cane Thousand tons 658,823 869,777 to 1,053,984 32.0 to 60.0

Tobacco Thousand tons 865 1,060 to 1,483 22.6 to 71.5

Sugar Thousand tons 37,878 52,913 to 62,066 39.7 to 63.9

Orange Thousand tons 16,333 17,521 to 25,741 7.3 to 57.6

Paper Thousand tons 10,759 13,320 to 13,830 23.8 to 28.5

Pulp Thousand tons 15,736 20,599 to 23,392 30.9 to 48.7

Cocoa Thousand tons 256 216 to 392 -15.7 to 52.9

Grape Thousand tons 1,361 1,650 to 2,117 21.3 to 55.6

Apple Thousand tons 1,271 1,642 to 2,078 29.2 to 63.5

Banana Thousand tons 701 765 to 944 9.1 to 34.7

Variation %Products UnitEstimates to 2013/14 Projection 2023/24

Page 87: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

86

Grain production should increase from 193.6 million tonnes in 2013/2014 to 252.4 million tons in 2024. This indicates an increase of 58.9 million tons to the current production in Brazil, and relative values 30.4%. This, however, will require an effort of growth that should consist of infrastructure, investment in research and funding. These estimates are compatible with the expansion of grain production in the last ten years where production grew 69.0 % (Conab, 2014). This result indicates that there is growth potential to achieve the designed values.

The production of meat (beef, pork and chicken) will increase by 7.9 million tons. Represents an increase of 30.3% in relation to meat production for 2013/2014. The chicken is the one to present the highest growth, 35.7% over 2014 production. Then pork, which is expected to grow 31.7% and then the beef, 22.8%.

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa*Grains: refers to crops raised by Conab in their surveys of crops (cotton, peanuts, rice, oats, canola, rye, barley, beans, sunflower, castor, corn, soybean, sorghum, wheat and triticale).

Table 26 – Brazil Production –Projections of Grains and Meat 2013/14 to 2023/24

2014/15 UP Limit. 2023/24

Production Thousand tons 193,566 199,656 to 217,428 252,437 30.4

Planted Area Thousand hectares 56,861 58,553 to 61,469 67,004 17.8

2014/15 Lsup. 2023/24

Chicken Thousand tons 12,691 13,081 to 14,122 17,216 35.7

Beef Thousand tons 9,753 9,762 to 10,799 11,975 22.8

Pork Thousand tons 3,553 3,666 to 4,067 4,680 31.7

Total Thousand tons 25,997 26,509 to 28,987 33,871 30.3

Unit Projection

Projection

2013/14

Increase of 7.9 million tons of meat

variation% 2013/14 to

2023/24

Increase of 58.9 million tons of grains and 10.1 million hectares

Meat Unit 2013/14variation% 2013/14 to

2023/24

Grains

Page 88: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

87

The growth of agricultural production in Brazil should continue happening based on productivity. Strong growth of total factor productivity should be maintained, as recent studies have shown, (Fuglie, K., Wang, Sun, Ball, V., 2012 and Gasques, et.al. 2014). These studies show that total factor productivity has grown over 4.0% per year over the past few years. The global average of the last years was 1.84%.

The results show a greater increase in agricultural production that increases in area. Between 2014 and 2024 grain production can grow between 30.4% and 52.3%, while the area should expand by between 17,8 and 45.3%. This projection shows a typical example of growth based on productivity. We do not believe that the grain area expands the upper limit of the projection, because the potential productivity is high, especially in products such as soybeans and corn.

Estimates made until 2023/2024 are that the total planted area with crops must pass the 70,2 million hectares in 2014 to 82.0 million in 2024. An increase of 11.8 million hectares. This area expansion is concentrated in soybean, more than 10.3 million hectares, and cane sugar, more than 2.3 million.

The expansion of soybean area and sugarcane should occur by the incorporation of new areas, areas of natural pastures and also for replacing other crops that will give area. Corn must have an expansion area around 1.0 million hectares (15.7 to 16.7 million hectares between 2014 and 2024) and other crops analyzed mostly tend to lose area.

The domestic market with exports and productivity gains, should be the main factors for growth in the next decade. In 2023/2024, 42.8% of soybean production should be aimed at the domestic market, and corn, 62.2% of production should be consumed internally. Thus there will be a double pressure on increasing domestic production, due to the growth of the domestic market and exports. Currently, 46.6% of the soybean produced is for domestic consumption, and corn, 69.0%.

In meat, there will be strong pressure of the internal market. The expected increase in the production of chicken, 67.2% of output in 2023/2024 will be for the domestic market; of beef produced, 74.8% will go to the internal market, and pork, 83.7% will be for the domestic market. Thus, although Brazil is generally a major exporter of many of these products, domestic consumption is prevalent in the destination of production.

Page 89: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

88

Source: AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Table 27- Brazil: Exports Projections 2013/14 to 2023/24

Cotton lint Thousand t 575 893 to 1,892 55.4 to 229.1

Corn Thousand t 21,000 33,698 to 52,237 60.5 to 148.7

Soybean Thousand t 45,297 65,244 to 82,563 44.0 to 82.3

Soybean meal Thousand t 13,579 15,701 to 22,422 15.6 to 65.1

Soybean oil Thousand t 1,374 1,626 to 4,036 18.4 to 193.9

Chicken Thousand t 4,002 5,784 to 7,478 44.5 to 86.9

Beef Thousand t 2,068 2,889 to 4,715 39.7 to 128.1

Pork Thousand t 534 784 to 1,230 46.9 to 130.4

Coffee Million sacs 32 40 to 52 24.0 to 63.7

Sugar Thousand t 27,154 38,801 to 50,378 42.9 to 85.5

Orange juice Thousand t 2,094 2,626 to 3,187 25.4 to 52.2

Milk Million litters 138 185 to 1,391 34.7 to 912

Paper Thousand t 1,937 2,332 to 3,229 20.4 to 66.7

Pulp Thousand t 9,853 13,735 to 16,375 39.4 to 66.2

Products Unit 2013/14 Projection 2023/24 Variation %

Page 90: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

89

Source: USDA,2014 and AGE/Mapa and SGE/Embrapa

Table 28 – Leadind Exporters of Agricultural Products in 2023/24

Million Tons

Share in the World Market (%)

United States 57.2 39.4Brazil 31.9 22.0Argentina 24.1 16.6Former Soviet Union 25.7 17.7Total Exports 145 100.0

Brazil 65.2 43.0United States 48.7 32.1Argentina 16.3 10.7Other South Americans12.5 8.2Total Exports 151.7 100.0

Brazil 2.9 28.9Índia 2.6 25.6United States 1.5 15.5Austrália 1.5 15.1Others 1.5 9.1New Zeland 0.6 5.8Total Exports 10.0 100.0

Brazill 5.8 48.9United States 4.3 36.1Sovietic Union 1.2 9.9Thailand 1.0 8.1China 0.6 4.7Total Exports 11.8 100.0

United States 2.9 36.9Union European 2.4 30.8Canada 1.4 17.2Brazil 0.8 10.0China 0.4 4.9

Total Exports 7.9 100.0

Pork

Corn

Soybean

Beef

Chicken

Page 91: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

90

The five complexes shown in the table represent the main food consumed in the world and considered essential by almost all the world’s population.

Should continue expressive and with a tendency to increase the participation of Brazil in world trade in soybeans, beef and chicken. As noted, the Brazilian soybean should have in 2023/2024 a share in world exports of 43.0%, beef 28.9%, and chicken, 48.9%. Besides its importance in relation to those goods Brazil will maintain leadership in world trade in coffee, and sugar.

Finally, the regional projections are indicating that the largest increases in production and area of cane sugar, must occur in the state of Goiás, although this is still a state of small production. But São Paulo as major national producer, also projected high growth of production and area of the product.

Mato Grosso should continue to lead the expansion of maize production in the country with higher expected increases in production to 62.2%. The region called MATOPIBA, to be situated in the Brazilian states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia, should present sharp increase in grain production as well as its area must also present significant increase. Projections indicate this region is expected to produce around 22.6 million tons of grain in 2024 (up 21.4%) and an area planted with grains between 8.4 and 10.9 million hectares at the end of the period of the projections.

Page 92: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

91

7. REFERENCES

ABIOVE – Associação Brasileira das Indústrias de Óleos Vegetais. Informações obtidas por solicitação, 2014

ABRAF - Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Florestas Plantadas, Anuário Estatístico da ABRAF, Brasília, 2009, 127 p.

AGROSTAT - (Banco de dados sobre comércio exterior). Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, 2014. www.agricultura.gov.br/internacional

BOWERMAN, Bruce L.; O'CONNEL, Richard T. e KOEHLER, Anne B. Forecasting Time Series and Regression, Thomson, 2005.

BOX, George E. P.; JENKINS, Gwilym M. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden Day.

Bradesco, Boletim Diário Matinal. Disponível em: <http://www.economiaemdia.com.br/>. Acesso em: 15/01/2013

Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Anuário Estatístico da Agroenergia 2012 - Secretaria de Produção e Agroenergia. Brasília 2013, 282 p.

Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Disponível em: <http://www.agricultura.gov.br>. Acesso em maio de 2014.

Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Projeções do Agronegócio: Brasil 2012/2013 a 2022/2023, Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica. Brasília, 2013, 95 p.

BRESSAN FILHO, Ângelo. O etanol como um novo combustível universal. Análise estatística e projeção do consumo doméstico e exportação de álcool etílico brasileiro no período de 2006 a 2011. Conab, agosto de 2008.

BROCKLEBANK, John C.; DICKEY, David A. SAS for Forecasting Time Series - SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2003

Page 93: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

92

CONAB. [Site oficial] Disponível em: <http://www.conab.gov.br>. Acesso em: maio e junho de 2014

EPE - Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Perspectivas para o Etanol no Brasil. Cadernos de Energia EPE, (2008).

FAPRI. World agricultural outlook 2008. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development - Iowa State University, 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/publications>. Acesso em: julho/2012

FGV - FGVDados. Disponível em: <www.fgvdados.fgv.br>. Acesso em maio de 2014 (banco de dados mediante assinatura)

Cepea/Esalq/USP. Disponível em: <www.cepea.esalq.usp.br>. Acesso em junho de 2014

Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming (2011). Final Project Report. The Government Office for Science. London.

HOFFMANN, R. Elasticidades Renda das Despesas e do Consumo de Alimentos no Brasil em 2002-2003. In: Silveira, F. G.; Servo, L. M. S.; Menezes, F. e Sergio. F. P. (Orgs). Gasto e Consumo das Famílias Brasileiras Contemporâneas. IPEA, V.2, Brasília, 2007, 551p.

HOMEM DE MELO, F. "A comercialização agrícola em 2012 : depreciação cambial deverá compensar a queda de preços internacionais - dados atualizados", publicado no boletim BIF da FIPE do mês de janeiro de 2012.

IBGE – PIB Municipal de 2011. www.ibge.gov.br/sidra . Acesso em junho de 2014

IBGE. Levantamento sistemático da produção agrícola (LSPA). Disponível em: <http://www.ibge.gov.br>. Acesso junho de 2014.IBGE/Cepagro - Ata de 06 de janeiro de 2011

IFPRI. Food Security, farming, and Climate Change to 2050. Scenarios, results, policy options. 2010.

Page 94: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

93

Fuglie Keith O., Wang S. Ling and Ball V. Eldon. Productivity growth in agriculture: an international perspective. USA, 2012

Keith, F. Productivity Growth in the Global Agricultural Economy .Pittsburg, 2011

Mapa- Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Diretoria de Agroenergia. Informações obtidas por solicitação, 2014.

Mapa- Ministério da Agricultura , Pecuária e Abastecimento. Departamento do Café – DECAF. 2014

MORETTIN, Pedro A.; TOLOI, Clelia M. C. Análise de Séries Temporais. ABE - Projeto Fisher e Ed. Blucher, 2004.

OIC – Organização Internacional do Café. Disponível em: <www.ico.org/coffee/statistics>. Acesso em maio e junho de 2014.

Santiago, C. M. Embrapa - Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Arroz e Feijão, 2013

SAS Institute Inc., SAS / ETS User's Guide, Version 8, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1999.

SAS, Institute Inc., Manuais do software versão 9.2, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2010.

SOUZA, G. S.; GAZOLLA, R.; COELHO, C. H. M.; MARRA, R.; OLIVEIRA, A. J. DE. Mercado de Carnes: Aspectos Descritivos e Experiências com o uso de Modelos de Equilíbrio Parcial e de Espaço de Estados. Embrapa - SGE, Revista de Política Agrícola, ano XV n. 1, 2006, Brasília.

UNICA - União da Indústria de Cana-de-açúcar - Sugarcane Industry in Brazil, Ethanol, Sugar, Bioelectricity, 2010 (folheto).

USDA. USDA Agricultural Projections. Disponível em: <http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/oce081>. Acesso em: fevereiro 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 e 2013, 2014.

Page 95: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

94

Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento - Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica

Projections of Agribusiness Brazil 2013/2014 a 2023/2024 56

ATTACHMENT 1 – Methodological Note 1. Introduction

The study of the national agribusiness projections consists on the analysis of

historical series with the use of statistical techniques for analysis of time series classified

as Exponential Smoothing, Box and Jenkins (ARIMA) and State-Space. Below, there is a

brief description of the models, methods and some concepts which were used in this

study. As general reference it is suggested Morettin and Toloi, 2004). Other specific

references are given throughout the text.

1.1 Stationary Process: A process is stationary (weakly) when its mean and its

variance are constant through the time and when the value of the co-variance between two

periods of time depends only on the difference between the two periods of time, and not

on the time itself where the covariance is calculated. We have:

Mean: E(Zt) = µ ;

Variance: VAR (Zt) = E(Zt – µ)2 = σ2

Covariance: ψκ = E[(Zt – µ)(Zt+κ – µ) ]

Where ψκ , is the covariance between the values of Zt and Zt+κ that is, between two values of

the time series separated by κ periods.

1.2 Purely Random Process or White Noise: A process (et) is purely random

when its mean is zero, its variance is σ2 and the variables et are not correlated.

1.3 Integrated Process: If a time series (non-stationary) has to be differenced d

times to become stationary, it is said that this series is integrated of order d. An integrated

time series Zt of order d is denoted as: Zt ~ I(d).

2. Exponential Smoothing Models

The Double Exponential Smoothing or Linear Smoothing is adequate to time series

Zt which evolve showing linear trend for which the linear and angular coefficients can also

vary in time. It is possible to demonstrate that optimal representations of the exponential

smoothing models are obtained from the ARIMA models and of State-Space models

described below. In the double exponential smoothing approach (the only one we are

dealing here) the linear coefficient tµ (level) of the series in period t and its growth rate tβ

Annex 1 - Methodological Note

Page 96: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

95

Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento - Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica

Projections of Agribusiness Brazil 2013/2014 a 2023/2024 57

in the same period are given by the smoothing equations (see Bowerman, O’ Connel and

Koehler, 2005)

( )1

1 1

(1 )( )(1 )

t t t t

t t t t

Zµ α α µ β

β γ µ µ γ β−

− −

= + − +

= − + −

where α and γ are constants in the interval (0,1) and t=1,2,...,N. The predictor of the

series in period N τ+ based on period N is given by ˆN N NZ τ µ τβ+ = + .

The exponential smoothing, simple, double (discussed here) or even triple can be

obtained from PROC FORECAST (SAS, 2010), but the standard errors of the predictors

may also be computed from state-space methods.

3. ARIMA Models

The Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model fits data

generated by a univariate time series, transformed to stationarity through calculations of

differences, using a class of models known as autoregressive processes, moving average

processes or mixed autoregressive-moving average processes

3.1. Autoregressive Process (AR)

Let Zt be a stationary time series. If we model Zt as

(Zt - µ) = α1(Zt -1 - µ) + et ,

where µ is the mean of Zt and et is a white noise, we say that Zt follows an autoregressive

process of first order, or AR(1). In this case, the value of Zt in period t depends on its value

in the previous period and on a random term; the values of Zt are expressed as deviations

of its mean value. So, this model says that the forecasted value of Zt in period t is simply a

proportion (= α1) of its value in the period (t-1) plus a random shock in period t. Stationarity is

achieved imposing 1 1.α <

In general, it is possible to have:

(Zt - µ) = α1(Zt -1 - µ) + α2(Zt -2 - µ) + ... + αp(Zt -p - µ) + et

In this case Zt follows an autoregressive process of order p, or AR(p) if the coefficients iα

satisfy appropriate conditions.

3.2. Moving Average Process (MA)

Page 97: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

96

Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento - Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica

Projections of Agribusiness Brazil 2013/2014 a 2023/2024 58

Let Zt be a stationary time series. If we model Zt as

1t t tZ e eµ β −= + −

Where µ and β are constants with 1β < , and the error term et is a white noise, it is

said that the time series defines the MA(1) - moving average process of order 1.

In general, if the time series satisfies

1 1 2 2t t t t q t qZ e e e eµ β β β− − −= + − − − −L

where the coefficients iβ satisfy additional conditions of invertibility, it is said that Zt follows

a moving average process of order q, or MA(q). In summary a moving average process is a

linear combination of terms of a white noise process.

3.3. Autoregressive Moving Average Process (ARMA)

If a stationary time series (Zt) has characteristics of AR with errors following a

process MA, it will be an ARMA process. The series Zt will follow an ARMA process (1,1),

for example, if it can be represented by

1 1t t t tZ Z e eµ α β− −= + + −

In general, for an ARMA process (p,q) there will be p autoregressive terms and q

moving average terms.

3.4. Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Process (ARIMA)

If a time series is not stationary, but when differenced d times it becomes

stationary, and it is an AR with errors MA, we say that the time series is an ARIMA (p, d,

q), that is, an integrated autoregressive-moving averages time series, where p denotes

the number of autoregressive terms, d is the number of times that we must difference the

series to make it stationary, and q, is the number of moving average terms. It is important

to emphasize ARMA models can be fit only to stationary and invertible time series. These

properties are achieved through differencing. This approach was proposed by Box and

Jenkins (1976). The fit and computation of forecasts of a given time series with the use of

Box and Jenkins techniques were performed here using PROC ARIMA (SAS, 2010).

3.5. Deterministic Trends with ARMA Errors

In one instance (consumption of cellulose) a satisfactory model was not possible

with the use of integrated models. In this case it was used the regression model Zt=F(t)+Ut

Page 98: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

97

Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento - Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica

Projections of Agribusiness Brazil 2013/2014 a 2023/2024 59

where Ut is an ARMA error and F(t) a linear function in time. The PROC ARIMA (SAS,

2010) produces statistics for these models using generalized least squares.

4. State-Space Models

The state-space model is a statistical model for a multivariate time series. It

represents the multivariate time series through auxiliary variables, some of which are not

observable directly. These auxiliary variables are denominated state-space variables. The

state-space vector summarizes all the information of values from the present and from the

past on the relevant time series for the prediction of future values for the series. The

observed time series are expressed as linear combination of the state variables. The state-

space model is called a Markovian representation or canonical representation of a

multivariate time series.

Let Zt be a q dimensional time series. Its representation in state-space, relate the

observations vector Zt to the state vector Xt , of dimension k, through the linear system

t t t t t tZ A X d S ε= + + (observation equation),

1t t t t t tX G X c Rη−= + + (state or system equation)

where t=1,..., N ; Αt is the matrix of the system of order (q x k); tε is the noise vector of the

observation of order (q x 1), not correlated in time, with mean vector zero and matrix of

variance tW of order (q x q), ; Gt is the transition matrix of order (k x k) ; tη is a noise vector

not correlated in time, of order (k x 1), with mean vector zero and matrix of variance tQ of

order (k x k); td has order (q x 1) ; tc has order (k x 1); tR has order (k x k).

In the state-space models it is supposed additionally that the initial state X0 has

mean µ0 and matrix of variance Σ0; the noise vectors tε and tη are not correlated with each

other and not correlated with the initial state, that is,

E(εtηs’) = 0, every t , s= 1,...,N; and

E(εt X0’) = 0 and E(ηt X0’) = 0, t= 1,...,N;

It is said that the state-space model is Gaussian when the noise vectors are

normally distributed. The matrixes Αt and Gt are non-stochastic; in this way if there is any

variation in time it will be pre-determined.

Page 99: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

98

Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento - Assessoria de Gestão Estratégica

Projections of Agribusiness Brazil 2013/2014 a 2023/2024 60

In this work it was used a particular form of the general representation described

above, which is the stationary representation described in SOUZA, et al, 2006 and

Brocklebank and Dickey, 2004.

It is important to notice here that every ARMA process has a state-space

representation.

The parameters of the state-space representation are estimated by maximum

likelihood supposing that the residual shocks vector are normally (multivariate) distributed.

The fit and forecasts of time series performed via state-space models were

performed using PROC STATESPACE (SAS, 2010).

5. AIC and SBC Information Criterion

The information criteria are very useful to assist in choosing the best model

among those which are potentially adequate. These criteria consider not only the quality of

the fit but also penalize the inclusion of extra parameters. Therefore, a model with more

parameters can have a better fit, however not necessarily it will be preferable in terms of

the information criterion. It is considered the best model by the information criteria the one

which presents the lowest values of AIC or SBC.

The information criterions known as Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the

Schwartz Bayesian Criterion (SBC) can be described as follows:

AIC = T ln (estimator of maximum verisimilitude) + 2n,

SBC = T ln (estimator of maximum verisimilitude) + n ln(T)

Where, T is the number of observations used in the computations and n the

number of parameters estimated.

It is interesting to highlight that these information criteria analyzed individually do

not have any meaning considering only one model. Comparison of alternative models (or

competing) is to be done in the same sampling period, in other words, with the same

quantity of information. In this work the use of the information criteria was used in the

choice of the order of some ARMA models and restricted to the Akaike criterion in the

context of the use of the state-space modeling.

Page 100: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

AN

NEX

2 –

Res

ult

s

Bra

zil –

Na

tio

na

l

Pro

ject

ion

of

Gra

ins*

- B

razi

l 20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

S

GE

/Em

bra

pa

*– r

aw

co

tto

n,p

ean

uts

, ri

ce, o

ats

, can

ola

, ry

e, b

arl

ey, b

ean

s, s

um

flo

wer,

cast

or,

co

rn, so

yb

ean

, so

rgh

um

, w

heat

an

d t

riti

cale

Pro

du

ctU

nit

20

13/1

420

14/1

520

15/1

620

16/1

720

17/1

820

18/1

920

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4va

riat

ion

%

2013

/14

to

2023

/24

Gra

ins*

pro

du

ctio

n1

93

,56

61

99

,65

62

05

,41

12

11

,31

52

17

,17

62

23

,05

62

28

,93

02

34

,80

72

40

,68

42

46

,56

02

52

,43

73

0

U

p li

mit

181,

884

184,

352

186,

280

189,

094

192,

110

195,

403

198,

870

202,

493

206,

241

210,

096

9

lo

wer

lim

it21

7,42

822

6,46

923

6,34

924

5,25

725

4,00

226

2,45

827

0,74

427

8,87

428

6,87

929

4,77

852

Gra

ins*

Are

a5

6,8

61

58

,55

35

9,7

41

60

,72

96

1,6

54

62

,55

56

3,4

48

64

,33

86

5,2

27

66

,11

56

7,0

04

18

U

p li

mit

55,6

3754

,309

53,3

8952

,688

52,1

9351

,845

51,6

1351

,469

51,3

9751

,384

-10

lo

wer

lim

it61

,469

65,1

7268

,068

70,6

2172

,917

75,0

5177

,063

78,9

8580

,834

82,6

2445

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

Page 101: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Pro

ject

ed P

rod

uti

on

- B

razi

l 20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

Pro

du

ctio

nU

nit

20

13/1

420

14/1

520

15/1

620

16/1

720

17/1

820

18/1

920

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4va

riat

ion

%

2013

/14

to

2023

/24

Co

tto

n

1,6

72

2,1

43

1,9

00

1,7

19

2,0

99

2,2

71

2,0

72

2,1

35

2,4

11

2,4

26

2,3

50

41

U

p li

mit

1,77

01,

477

1,29

01,

641

1,73

01,

522

1,58

21,

819

1,80

01,

719

3

lo

wer

lim

it2,

517

2,32

22,

148

2,55

82,

813

2,62

22,

689

3,00

43,

051

2,98

178

Ric

e

12

,25

11

2,7

03

12

,80

71

2,9

10

13

,01

41

3,1

18

13

,22

21

3,3

26

13

,42

91

3,5

33

13

,63

71

1

U

p li

mit

10,1

209,

155

8,43

87,

849

7,34

46,

896

6,49

36,

125

5,78

65,

471

-55

lo

wer

lim

it15

,285

16,4

5917

,383

18,1

7918

,892

19,5

4720

,158

20,7

3421

,280

21,8

0378

Bean

s3

,71

43

,17

92

,92

83

,26

83

,22

73

,03

63

,16

43

,20

53

,09

93

,12

93

,17

3-1

5

U

p li

mit

2,52

42,

212

2,54

72,

388

2,12

42,

232

2,21

72,

049

2,04

92,

053

-45

lo

wer

lim

it3,

835

3,64

43,

990

4,06

63,

949

4,09

64,

193

4,14

94,

209

4,29

216

Co

rn

77

,88

78

0,7

17

83

,46

28

6,7

73

88

,11

89

1,5

16

93

,19

39

6,5

28

98

,13

81

01

,49

71

03

,12

13

2

U

p li

mit

67,5

3866

,113

65,9

6265

,296

65,5

4465

,438

66,2

0966

,297

67,3

7767

,638

-13

lo

wer

lim

it93

,896

100,

811

107,

583

110,

940

117,

488

120,

947

126,

846

129,

980

135,

617

138,

603

78

So

yb

ean

s 8

6,0

52

89

,83

19

3,2

54

96

,37

79

9,4

79

10

2,5

55

10

5,6

06

10

8,6

60

11

1,7

12

11

4,7

61

11

7,8

11

37

U

p li

mit

81,4

4682

,683

84,2

0585

,582

87,1

8888

,903

90,6

9692

,577

94,5

2396

,525

12

lo

wer

lim

it98

,215

103,

825

108,

549

113,

376

117,

921

122,

309

126,

624

130,

846

134,

999

139,

097

62

So

yb

ean

s m

eal

28

,10

52

8,6

76

30

,07

93

0,5

34

31

,04

13

1,9

10

32

,56

23

3,1

35

33

,85

63

4,5

39

35

,16

82

5

U

p li

mit

26,2

7526

,986

27,1

3427

,165

27,6

0127

,967

28,2

2728

,630

29,0

4729

,417

5

lo

wer

lim

it31

,078

33,1

7333

,935

34,9

1836

,218

37,1

5838

,043

39,0

8240

,031

40,9

1946

So

yb

ean

s o

il7

,11

87

,35

37

,51

07

,70

67

,88

68

,06

68

,24

78

,42

58

,60

48

,78

38

,96

12

6

U

p li

mit

6,58

16,

539

6,58

46,

608

6,66

06,

720

6,78

76,

862

6,94

17,

026

-1

lo

wer

lim

it8,

125

8,48

18,

827

9,16

49,

472

9,77

310

,064

10,3

4710

,624

10,8

9653

Wh

eat

7,3

73

7,6

35

7,8

97

8,1

58

8,4

20

8,6

82

8,9

44

9,2

05

9,4

67

9,7

29

9,9

91

35

U

p li

mit

4,75

13,

818

3,16

32,

652

2,23

31,

879

1,57

41,

309

1,07

687

0-8

8

lo

wer

lim

it10

,519

11,9

7513

,154

14,1

8815

,131

16,0

0816

,836

17,6

2518

,381

19,1

1115

9

Ch

icken

12

,69

11

3,0

81

13

,51

91

3,9

72

14

,43

21

4,8

94

15

,35

81

5,8

22

16

,28

61

6,7

51

17

,21

63

6

U

p li

mit

12,0

4112

,417

12,3

7212

,774

12,8

5713

,270

13,4

1913

,839

14,0

2914

,454

14

lo

wer

lim

it14

,122

14,6

2015

,571

16,0

9016

,931

17,4

4518

,225

18,7

3419

,474

19,9

7957

Beef

9,7

53

9,7

62

10

,30

91

0,6

32

10

,45

11

0,5

89

11

,02

71

1,1

05

11

,15

91

1,6

15

11

,97

52

3

U

p li

mit

8,72

58,

696

8,69

18,

242

8,08

68,

454

8,51

08,

520

8,91

69,

243

-5

lo

wer

lim

it10

,799

11,9

2112

,573

12,6

6113

,091

13,6

0013

,699

13,7

9914

,314

14,7

0751

Po

rk3

,55

33

,66

63

,77

83

,89

14

,00

44

,11

64

,22

94

,34

24

,45

44

,56

74

,68

03

2

U

p li

mit

3,26

43,

211

3,19

63,

201

3,21

93,

246

3,28

03,

319

3,36

33,

411

-4

lo

wer

lim

it4,

067

4,34

64,

586

4,80

65,

013

5,21

25,

403

5,58

95,

771

5,94

867

Co

ffee

47

48

51

53

54

55

56

58

59

60

61

31

U

p li

mit

4840

4040

3940

4040

4141

-13

lo

wer

lim

it48

6267

6872

7376

7780

8274

Su

gar

37

,87

84

0,3

30

41

,26

54

2,9

37

44

,26

44

5,7

49

47

,16

34

8,6

08

50

,04

05

1,4

78

52

,91

34

0

U

p li

mit

36,5

8536

,755

37,5

7038

,223

39,0

8339

,932

40,8

5241

,791

42,7

6543

,759

16

lo

wer

lim

it44

,074

45,7

7448

,304

50,3

0552

,415

54,3

9456

,365

58,2

8860

,190

62,0

6664

Man

ioc

22

,65

52

2,9

02

22

,29

22

2,4

73

22

,30

72

2,2

13

22

,14

02

2,0

39

21

,95

22

1,8

61

21

,77

0-4

U

p li

mit

18,6

9516

,920

16,2

8915

,253

14,4

5513

,720

13,0

0512

,346

11,7

1411

,109

-51

lo

wer

lim

it27

,108

27,6

6528

,658

29,3

6229

,971

30,5

5931

,073

31,5

5832

,008

32,4

3143

Po

tato

3,7

11

3,9

48

3,9

50

3,9

28

4,0

28

4,1

27

4,1

65

4,2

09

4,2

84

4,3

52

4,4

06

19

U

p li

mit

3,64

23,

622

3,59

93,

686

3,75

43,

781

3,82

03,

882

3,93

63,

980

7

lo

wer

lim

it4,

254

4,27

94,

257

4,37

04,

501

4,54

94,

599

4,68

64,

768

4,83

130

Ora

ng

e1

6,3

33

16

,45

21

6,5

71

16

,68

91

6,8

08

16

,92

71

7,0

46

17

,16

51

7,2

83

17

,40

21

7,5

21

7

U

p li

mit

13,8

5312

,895

12,1

8711

,610

11,1

1510

,679

10,2

889,

932

9,60

49,

301

-43

lo

wer

lim

it19

,051

20,2

4721

,191

22,0

0722

,739

23,4

1324

,042

24,6

3525

,200

25,7

4158

Mil

k3

4,4

08

36

,32

23

6,4

73

38

,37

73

8,5

23

40

,42

54

0,5

69

42

,47

04

2,6

13

44

,51

44

4,6

57

30

U

p li

mit

34,7

4634

,060

35,7

3935

,220

36,9

2336

,516

38,2

4437

,912

39,6

6039

,381

14

lo

wer

lim

it37

,897

38,8

8541

,016

41,8

2643

,927

44,6

2346

,696

47,3

1549

,368

49,9

3345

Tob

acc

o8

65

89

09

04

92

99

43

96

89

82

1,0

07

1,0

21

1,0

46

1,0

60

23

U

p li

mit

701

715

661

675

640

654

628

642

622

636

-26

lo

wer

lim

it1,

079

1,09

31,

197

1,21

11,

296

1,31

01,

385

1,39

91,

469

1,48

372

Su

gar

Can

e6

58

,82

36

71

,69

06

91

,57

67

13

,39

97

36

,94

67

59

,18

57

81

,31

58

03

,27

68

25

,44

68

47

,60

28

69

,77

73

2

U

p li

mit

671,

690

659,

439

644,

897

636,

543

637,

752

645,

198

654,

149

663,

961

674,

368

685,

569

4

lo

wer

lim

it67

1,69

072

3,71

478

1,90

083

7,34

888

0,61

891

7,43

295

2,40

398

6,93

01,

020,

836

1,05

3,98

460

coco

a2

56

24

92

47

24

22

39

23

52

31

22

72

24

22

02

16

-16

U

p li

mit

182

161

141

124

108

9379

6553

40-8

4

lo

wer

lim

it31

533

234

335

436

236

937

638

238

739

253

Gra

pe

1,3

61

1,4

13

1,4

24

1,4

59

1,4

83

1,5

13

1,5

39

1,5

67

1,5

95

1,6

22

1,6

50

21

U

p li

mit

1,22

11,

201

1,18

61,

177

1,17

31,

171

1,17

21,

174

1,17

81,

183

-13

lo

wer

lim

it1,

605

1,64

71,

733

1,78

81,

852

1,90

71,

963

2,01

52,

067

2,11

756

Ap

ple

1,2

71

1,3

06

1,3

44

1,3

81

1,4

18

1,4

56

1,4

93

1,5

30

1,5

68

1,6

05

1,6

42

29

U

p li

mit

1,12

41,

128

1,12

41,

130

1,13

71,

148

1,16

01,

174

1,19

01,

206

-5

lo

wer

lim

it1,

488

1,56

01,

638

1,70

71,

774

1,83

81,

900

1,96

12,

020

2,07

864

Ban

an

a7

01

70

77

14

72

07

26

73

37

39

74

67

52

75

87

65

9

U

p li

mit

651

634

622

613

606

601

596

592

589

586

-16

lo

wer

lim

it76

479

381

883

985

987

889

591

292

894

435

Pap

er

10

,75

91

0,9

92

11

,26

71

1,5

16

11

,77

61

2,0

35

12

,28

91

2,5

53

12

,80

51

3,0

70

13

,32

02

4

U

p li

mit

10,7

4610

,969

11,1

8411

,415

11,6

4111

,874

12,1

0612

,340

12,5

7612

,811

19

lo

wer

lim

it11

,237

11,5

6511

,848

12,1

3612

,429

12,7

0413

,000

13,2

6913

,564

13,8

3029

Pu

lp1

5,7

36

16

,17

31

6,6

75

17

,18

31

7,6

51

18

,15

61

8,6

40

19

,12

81

9,6

22

20

,10

82

0,5

99

31

U

p li

mit

15,2

4015

,397

15,6

8615

,892

16,1

9616

,492

16,7

9817

,131

17,4

6117

,806

13

lo

wer

lim

it17

,106

17,9

5218

,681

19,4

1020

,116

20,7

8921

,459

22,1

1322

,755

23,3

9249

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

b

un

che

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

n l

iters

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

bag

s

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

Page 102: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

aN

ote

: S

ug

ar

Can

e r

efe

rs t

o t

he s

ug

ar

can

e in

ten

ded

to

alc

oh

ol an

d s

ug

ar

pro

du

cti

on

* se

ed

co

tto

n, f

ull

pean

uts

, ric

e, o

ats

, can

ola

, rye, b

arl

ey, f

ull

bean

s, s

un

flo

wer,

cast

or,

fu

ll co

rn, s

oyb

ean

s, s

org

hu

m, w

heat

an

d t

riti

cale

Pro

du

ctio

nU

nit

20

13/1

420

14/1

520

15/1

620

16/1

720

17/1

820

18/1

920

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4va

riat

ion

%

2013

/14

to

2023

/24

Co

tto

n

1,6

72

2,1

43

1,9

00

1,7

19

2,0

99

2,2

71

2,0

72

2,1

35

2,4

11

2,4

26

2,3

50

41

U

p li

mit

1,77

01,

477

1,29

01,

641

1,73

01,

522

1,58

21,

819

1,80

01,

719

3

lo

wer

lim

it2,

517

2,32

22,

148

2,55

82,

813

2,62

22,

689

3,00

43,

051

2,98

178

Ric

e

12

,25

11

2,7

03

12

,80

71

2,9

10

13

,01

41

3,1

18

13

,22

21

3,3

26

13

,42

91

3,5

33

13

,63

71

1

U

p li

mit

10,1

209,

155

8,43

87,

849

7,34

46,

896

6,49

36,

125

5,78

65,

471

-55

lo

wer

lim

it15

,285

16,4

5917

,383

18,1

7918

,892

19,5

4720

,158

20,7

3421

,280

21,8

0378

Bean

s3

,71

43

,17

92

,92

83

,26

83

,22

73

,03

63

,16

43

,20

53

,09

93

,12

93

,17

3-1

5

U

p li

mit

2,52

42,

212

2,54

72,

388

2,12

42,

232

2,21

72,

049

2,04

92,

053

-45

lo

wer

lim

it3,

835

3,64

43,

990

4,06

63,

949

4,09

64,

193

4,14

94,

209

4,29

216

Co

rn

77

,88

78

0,7

17

83

,46

28

6,7

73

88

,11

89

1,5

16

93

,19

39

6,5

28

98

,13

81

01

,49

71

03

,12

13

2

U

p li

mit

67,5

3866

,113

65,9

6265

,296

65,5

4465

,438

66,2

0966

,297

67,3

7767

,638

-13

lo

wer

lim

it93

,896

100,

811

107,

583

110,

940

117,

488

120,

947

126,

846

129,

980

135,

617

138,

603

78

So

yb

ean

s 8

6,0

52

89

,83

19

3,2

54

96

,37

79

9,4

79

10

2,5

55

10

5,6

06

10

8,6

60

11

1,7

12

11

4,7

61

11

7,8

11

37

U

p li

mit

81,4

4682

,683

84,2

0585

,582

87,1

8888

,903

90,6

9692

,577

94,5

2396

,525

12

lo

wer

lim

it98

,215

103,

825

108,

549

113,

376

117,

921

122,

309

126,

624

130,

846

134,

999

139,

097

62

So

yb

ean

s m

eal

28

,10

52

8,6

76

30

,07

93

0,5

34

31

,04

13

1,9

10

32

,56

23

3,1

35

33

,85

63

4,5

39

35

,16

82

5

U

p li

mit

26,2

7526

,986

27,1

3427

,165

27,6

0127

,967

28,2

2728

,630

29,0

4729

,417

5

lo

wer

lim

it31

,078

33,1

7333

,935

34,9

1836

,218

37,1

5838

,043

39,0

8240

,031

40,9

1946

So

yb

ean

s o

il7

,11

87

,35

37

,51

07

,70

67

,88

68

,06

68

,24

78

,42

58

,60

48

,78

38

,96

12

6

U

p li

mit

6,58

16,

539

6,58

46,

608

6,66

06,

720

6,78

76,

862

6,94

17,

026

-1

lo

wer

lim

it8,

125

8,48

18,

827

9,16

49,

472

9,77

310

,064

10,3

4710

,624

10,8

9653

Wh

eat

7,3

73

7,6

35

7,8

97

8,1

58

8,4

20

8,6

82

8,9

44

9,2

05

9,4

67

9,7

29

9,9

91

35

U

p li

mit

4,75

13,

818

3,16

32,

652

2,23

31,

879

1,57

41,

309

1,07

687

0-8

8

lo

wer

lim

it10

,519

11,9

7513

,154

14,1

8815

,131

16,0

0816

,836

17,6

2518

,381

19,1

1115

9

Ch

icken

12

,69

11

3,0

81

13

,51

91

3,9

72

14

,43

21

4,8

94

15

,35

81

5,8

22

16

,28

61

6,7

51

17

,21

63

6

U

p li

mit

12,0

4112

,417

12,3

7212

,774

12,8

5713

,270

13,4

1913

,839

14,0

2914

,454

14

lo

wer

lim

it14

,122

14,6

2015

,571

16,0

9016

,931

17,4

4518

,225

18,7

3419

,474

19,9

7957

Beef

9,7

53

9,7

62

10

,30

91

0,6

32

10

,45

11

0,5

89

11

,02

71

1,1

05

11

,15

91

1,6

15

11

,97

52

3

U

p li

mit

8,72

58,

696

8,69

18,

242

8,08

68,

454

8,51

08,

520

8,91

69,

243

-5

lo

wer

lim

it10

,799

11,9

2112

,573

12,6

6113

,091

13,6

0013

,699

13,7

9914

,314

14,7

0751

Po

rk3

,55

33

,66

63

,77

83

,89

14

,00

44

,11

64

,22

94

,34

24

,45

44

,56

74

,68

03

2

U

p li

mit

3,26

43,

211

3,19

63,

201

3,21

93,

246

3,28

03,

319

3,36

33,

411

-4

lo

wer

lim

it4,

067

4,34

64,

586

4,80

65,

013

5,21

25,

403

5,58

95,

771

5,94

867

Co

ffee

47

48

51

53

54

55

56

58

59

60

61

31

U

p li

mit

4840

4040

3940

4040

4141

-13

lo

wer

lim

it48

6267

6872

7376

7780

8274

Su

gar

37

,87

84

0,3

30

41

,26

54

2,9

37

44

,26

44

5,7

49

47

,16

34

8,6

08

50

,04

05

1,4

78

52

,91

34

0

U

p li

mit

36,5

8536

,755

37,5

7038

,223

39,0

8339

,932

40,8

5241

,791

42,7

6543

,759

16

lo

wer

lim

it44

,074

45,7

7448

,304

50,3

0552

,415

54,3

9456

,365

58,2

8860

,190

62,0

6664

Man

ioc

22

,65

52

2,9

02

22

,29

22

2,4

73

22

,30

72

2,2

13

22

,14

02

2,0

39

21

,95

22

1,8

61

21

,77

0-4

U

p li

mit

18,6

9516

,920

16,2

8915

,253

14,4

5513

,720

13,0

0512

,346

11,7

1411

,109

-51

lo

wer

lim

it27

,108

27,6

6528

,658

29,3

6229

,971

30,5

5931

,073

31,5

5832

,008

32,4

3143

Po

tato

3,7

11

3,9

48

3,9

50

3,9

28

4,0

28

4,1

27

4,1

65

4,2

09

4,2

84

4,3

52

4,4

06

19

U

p li

mit

3,64

23,

622

3,59

93,

686

3,75

43,

781

3,82

03,

882

3,93

63,

980

7

lo

wer

lim

it4,

254

4,27

94,

257

4,37

04,

501

4,54

94,

599

4,68

64,

768

4,83

130

Ora

ng

e1

6,3

33

16

,45

21

6,5

71

16

,68

91

6,8

08

16

,92

71

7,0

46

17

,16

51

7,2

83

17

,40

21

7,5

21

7

U

p li

mit

13,8

5312

,895

12,1

8711

,610

11,1

1510

,679

10,2

889,

932

9,60

49,

301

-43

lo

wer

lim

it19

,051

20,2

4721

,191

22,0

0722

,739

23,4

1324

,042

24,6

3525

,200

25,7

4158

Mil

k3

4,4

08

36

,32

23

6,4

73

38

,37

73

8,5

23

40

,42

54

0,5

69

42

,47

04

2,6

13

44

,51

44

4,6

57

30

U

p li

mit

34,7

4634

,060

35,7

3935

,220

36,9

2336

,516

38,2

4437

,912

39,6

6039

,381

14

lo

wer

lim

it37

,897

38,8

8541

,016

41,8

2643

,927

44,6

2346

,696

47,3

1549

,368

49,9

3345

Tob

acc

o8

65

89

09

04

92

99

43

96

89

82

1,0

07

1,0

21

1,0

46

1,0

60

23

U

p li

mit

701

715

661

675

640

654

628

642

622

636

-26

lo

wer

lim

it1,

079

1,09

31,

197

1,21

11,

296

1,31

01,

385

1,39

91,

469

1,48

372

Su

gar

Can

e6

58

,82

36

71

,69

06

91

,57

67

13

,39

97

36

,94

67

59

,18

57

81

,31

58

03

,27

68

25

,44

68

47

,60

28

69

,77

73

2

U

p li

mit

671,

690

659,

439

644,

897

636,

543

637,

752

645,

198

654,

149

663,

961

674,

368

685,

569

4

lo

wer

lim

it67

1,69

072

3,71

478

1,90

083

7,34

888

0,61

891

7,43

295

2,40

398

6,93

01,

020,

836

1,05

3,98

460

coco

a2

56

24

92

47

24

22

39

23

52

31

22

72

24

22

02

16

-16

U

p li

mit

182

161

141

124

108

9379

6553

40-8

4

lo

wer

lim

it31

533

234

335

436

236

937

638

238

739

253

Gra

pe

1,3

61

1,4

13

1,4

24

1,4

59

1,4

83

1,5

13

1,5

39

1,5

67

1,5

95

1,6

22

1,6

50

21

U

p li

mit

1,22

11,

201

1,18

61,

177

1,17

31,

171

1,17

21,

174

1,17

81,

183

-13

lo

wer

lim

it1,

605

1,64

71,

733

1,78

81,

852

1,90

71,

963

2,01

52,

067

2,11

756

Ap

ple

1,2

71

1,3

06

1,3

44

1,3

81

1,4

18

1,4

56

1,4

93

1,5

30

1,5

68

1,6

05

1,6

42

29

U

p li

mit

1,12

41,

128

1,12

41,

130

1,13

71,

148

1,16

01,

174

1,19

01,

206

-5

lo

wer

lim

it1,

488

1,56

01,

638

1,70

71,

774

1,83

81,

900

1,96

12,

020

2,07

864

Ban

an

a7

01

70

77

14

72

07

26

73

37

39

74

67

52

75

87

65

9

U

p li

mit

651

634

622

613

606

601

596

592

589

586

-16

lo

wer

lim

it76

479

381

883

985

987

889

591

292

894

435

Pap

er

10

,75

91

0,9

92

11

,26

71

1,5

16

11

,77

61

2,0

35

12

,28

91

2,5

53

12

,80

51

3,0

70

13

,32

02

4

U

p li

mit

10,7

4610

,969

11,1

8411

,415

11,6

4111

,874

12,1

0612

,340

12,5

7612

,811

19

lo

wer

lim

it11

,237

11,5

6511

,848

12,1

3612

,429

12,7

0413

,000

13,2

6913

,564

13,8

3029

Pu

lp1

5,7

36

16

,17

31

6,6

75

17

,18

31

7,6

51

18

,15

61

8,6

40

19

,12

81

9,6

22

20

,10

82

0,5

99

31

U

p li

mit

15,2

4015

,397

15,6

8615

,892

16,1

9616

,492

16,7

9817

,131

17,4

6117

,806

13

lo

wer

lim

it17

,106

17,9

5218

,681

19,4

1020

,116

20,7

8921

,459

22,1

1322

,755

23,3

9249

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

b

un

che

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

n l

iters

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

bag

s

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

Page 103: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Pro

ject

ion

s o

f P

lan

ted

Are

a -

Bra

zil 2

013

/20

14 t

o 2

023

/20

24

Plan

ted

Are

aU

nit

20

13/1

420

14/1

520

15/1

620

16/1

720

17/1

820

18/1

920

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4va

riat

ion

%

2013

/14

to

2023

/24

Co

tto

n1

,09

51

,42

01

,22

21

,03

01

,25

81

,35

61

,17

11

,16

31

,32

41

,30

11

,20

01

0

U

p li

mit

1,09

485

061

880

984

563

760

773

267

855

8-4

9

lo

wer

lim

it1,

747

1,59

41,

442

1,70

61,

867

1,70

41,

719

1,91

51,

924

1,84

268

Ric

e

2,4

17

2,3

18

2,2

20

2,1

21

2,0

22

1,9

24

1,8

25

1,7

26

1,6

27

1,5

29

1,4

30

-41

U

p li

mit

1,67

71,

312

1,01

073

948

925

429

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it2,

960

3,12

73,

232

3,30

53,

358

3,39

63,

423

3,44

23,

453

3,45

843

Bean

s3

,35

93

,24

53

,13

13

,01

62

,90

22

,78

82

,67

42

,55

92

,44

52

,33

12

,21

7-3

4

U

p li

mit

2,47

32,

039

1,68

01,

359

1,06

278

451

826

316

--

lo

wer

lim

it4,

016

4,22

24,

353

4,44

54,

513

4,56

34,

601

4,62

74,

645

4,65

639

Co

rn

15

,72

61

5,6

59

15

,87

41

5,9

93

16

,08

01

6,1

88

16

,30

31

6,4

12

16

,52

01

6,6

30

16

,73

96

U

p li

mit

13,7

9913

,326

12,9

3112

,606

12,3

2012

,079

11,8

6311

,668

11,4

9111

,329

-28

lo

wer

lim

it17

,518

18,4

2219

,055

19,5

5320

,056

20,5

2720

,960

21,3

7221

,768

22,1

4941

So

yb

ean

s 3

0,1

05

31

,59

83

2,7

64

33

,78

53

4,7

51

35

,69

73

6,6

33

37

,56

53

8,4

96

39

,42

74

0,3

57

34

U

p li

mit

29,3

0928

,792

28,3

9528

,166

28,0

7028

,078

28,1

7128

,330

28,5

4328

,799

-4

lo

wer

lim

it33

,887

36,7

3639

,176

41,3

3643

,324

45,1

8746

,959

48,6

6250

,311

51,9

1572

Wh

eat

2,6

17

2,6

76

2,7

34

2,7

93

2,8

51

2,9

10

2,9

68

3,0

27

3,0

85

3,1

44

3,2

03

22

U

p li

mit

1,97

51,

743

1,57

91,

450

1,34

31,

252

1,17

31,

103

1,04

298

6-6

2

lo

wer

lim

it3,

376

3,72

54,

006

4,25

34,

477

4,68

54,

881

5,06

85,

246

5,41

910

7

Co

ffee

2,0

16

1,9

55

1,9

66

1,9

58

1,9

44

1,9

38

1,9

25

1,9

18

1,9

06

1,8

98

1,8

87

-6

U

p li

mit

1,95

51,

507

1,42

31,

333

1,26

31,

190

1,12

91,

065

1,00

995

2-5

3

lo

wer

lim

it1,

955

2,42

52,

494

2,55

52,

613

2,66

12,

707

2,74

72,

787

2,82

240

Man

ioc

( * )

1,5

25

1,5

66

1,5

09

1,5

08

1,4

90

1,4

72

1,4

57

1,4

40

1,4

24

1,4

08

1,3

91

-9

U

p li

mit

1,33

51,

200

1,15

31,

083

1,02

497

091

786

882

077

3-4

9

lo

wer

lim

it1,

797

1,81

81,

863

1,89

71,

920

1,94

41,

963

1,98

01,

996

2,01

032

Po

tato

( *

)1

32

13

21

28

12

51

24

12

21

20

11

81

16

11

41

12

-15

U

p li

mit

118

112

109

108

105

102

9997

9492

-30

lo

wer

lim

it14

714

414

114

014

013

813

713

513

413

21

Ora

ng

e (

* )

71

77

08

69

96

90

68

16

72

66

36

54

64

56

36

62

7-1

3

U

p li

mit

599

545

502

463

429

396

366

337

310

283

-61

lo

wer

lim

it81

785

387

889

891

592

994

195

296

297

035

Tob

acc

o (

* )

41

74

25

43

24

37

44

34

48

45

34

57

46

24

67

47

21

3

U

p li

mit

374

340

310

284

262

243

226

211

197

185

-56

lo

wer

lim

it47

752

456

560

163

366

268

871

373

775

982

Su

gar

Can

e (

* )

8,8

11

9,1

30

9,2

58

9,5

37

9,7

48

9,9

90

10

,20

91

0,4

40

10

,66

61

0,8

95

11

,12

32

6

U

p li

mit

9,13

08,

566

8,44

18,

222

8,20

48,

201

8,24

18,

282

8,34

18,

408

-5

lo

wer

lim

it9,

130

9,94

910

,634

11,2

7411

,776

12,2

1812

,640

13,0

5013

,450

13,8

3857

coco

a (

* )

68

66

84

68

56

83

68

36

82

68

16

81

68

06

80

67

9-1

U

p li

mit

604

594

579

570

560

551

542

534

526

518

-24

lo

wer

lim

it76

477

578

779

680

581

282

082

783

383

922

Gra

pe (

* )

78

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

84

85

86

10

U

p li

mit

7472

7170

6969

6969

6868

-12

lo

wer

lim

it83

8689

9294

9698

100

102

104

33

Ap

ple

( *

)3

73

83

83

93

94

04

04

14

14

24

21

3

U

p li

mit

3635

3535

3535

3536

3636

-4

lo

wer

lim

it40

4142

4445

4546

4748

4931

Ban

an

a (

* )

48

94

87

48

54

84

48

24

80

47

94

77

47

54

74

47

2-3

U

p li

mit

455

440

429

418

409

401

393

385

378

371

-24

lo

wer

lim

it51

953

053

954

555

155

656

156

556

957

217

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

Page 104: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

aN

ote

: A

rea o

f S

ug

ar

Can

e , r

efe

rs t

o a

rea d

est

inate

d t

o p

rod

ucti

on

of

alc

oh

ol an

d s

ug

ar.

* h

arv

est

ed

are

a

Plan

ted

Are

aU

nit

20

13/1

420

14/1

520

15/1

620

16/1

720

17/1

820

18/1

920

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4va

riat

ion

%

2013

/14

to

2023

/24

Co

tto

n1

,09

51

,42

01

,22

21

,03

01

,25

81

,35

61

,17

11

,16

31

,32

41

,30

11

,20

01

0

U

p li

mit

1,09

485

061

880

984

563

760

773

267

855

8-4

9

lo

wer

lim

it1,

747

1,59

41,

442

1,70

61,

867

1,70

41,

719

1,91

51,

924

1,84

268

Ric

e

2,4

17

2,3

18

2,2

20

2,1

21

2,0

22

1,9

24

1,8

25

1,7

26

1,6

27

1,5

29

1,4

30

-41

U

p li

mit

1,67

71,

312

1,01

073

948

925

429

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it2,

960

3,12

73,

232

3,30

53,

358

3,39

63,

423

3,44

23,

453

3,45

843

Bean

s3

,35

93

,24

53

,13

13

,01

62

,90

22

,78

82

,67

42

,55

92

,44

52

,33

12

,21

7-3

4

U

p li

mit

2,47

32,

039

1,68

01,

359

1,06

278

451

826

316

--

lo

wer

lim

it4,

016

4,22

24,

353

4,44

54,

513

4,56

34,

601

4,62

74,

645

4,65

639

Co

rn

15

,72

61

5,6

59

15

,87

41

5,9

93

16

,08

01

6,1

88

16

,30

31

6,4

12

16

,52

01

6,6

30

16

,73

96

U

p li

mit

13,7

9913

,326

12,9

3112

,606

12,3

2012

,079

11,8

6311

,668

11,4

9111

,329

-28

lo

wer

lim

it17

,518

18,4

2219

,055

19,5

5320

,056

20,5

2720

,960

21,3

7221

,768

22,1

4941

So

yb

ean

s 3

0,1

05

31

,59

83

2,7

64

33

,78

53

4,7

51

35

,69

73

6,6

33

37

,56

53

8,4

96

39

,42

74

0,3

57

34

U

p li

mit

29,3

0928

,792

28,3

9528

,166

28,0

7028

,078

28,1

7128

,330

28,5

4328

,799

-4

lo

wer

lim

it33

,887

36,7

3639

,176

41,3

3643

,324

45,1

8746

,959

48,6

6250

,311

51,9

1572

Wh

eat

2,6

17

2,6

76

2,7

34

2,7

93

2,8

51

2,9

10

2,9

68

3,0

27

3,0

85

3,1

44

3,2

03

22

U

p li

mit

1,97

51,

743

1,57

91,

450

1,34

31,

252

1,17

31,

103

1,04

298

6-6

2

lo

wer

lim

it3,

376

3,72

54,

006

4,25

34,

477

4,68

54,

881

5,06

85,

246

5,41

910

7

Co

ffee

2,0

16

1,9

55

1,9

66

1,9

58

1,9

44

1,9

38

1,9

25

1,9

18

1,9

06

1,8

98

1,8

87

-6

U

p li

mit

1,95

51,

507

1,42

31,

333

1,26

31,

190

1,12

91,

065

1,00

995

2-5

3

lo

wer

lim

it1,

955

2,42

52,

494

2,55

52,

613

2,66

12,

707

2,74

72,

787

2,82

240

Man

ioc

( * )

1,5

25

1,5

66

1,5

09

1,5

08

1,4

90

1,4

72

1,4

57

1,4

40

1,4

24

1,4

08

1,3

91

-9

U

p li

mit

1,33

51,

200

1,15

31,

083

1,02

497

091

786

882

077

3-4

9

lo

wer

lim

it1,

797

1,81

81,

863

1,89

71,

920

1,94

41,

963

1,98

01,

996

2,01

032

Po

tato

( *

)1

32

13

21

28

12

51

24

12

21

20

11

81

16

11

41

12

-15

U

p li

mit

118

112

109

108

105

102

9997

9492

-30

lo

wer

lim

it14

714

414

114

014

013

813

713

513

413

21

Ora

ng

e (

* )

71

77

08

69

96

90

68

16

72

66

36

54

64

56

36

62

7-1

3

U

p li

mit

599

545

502

463

429

396

366

337

310

283

-61

lo

wer

lim

it81

785

387

889

891

592

994

195

296

297

035

Tob

acc

o (

* )

41

74

25

43

24

37

44

34

48

45

34

57

46

24

67

47

21

3

U

p li

mit

374

340

310

284

262

243

226

211

197

185

-56

lo

wer

lim

it47

752

456

560

163

366

268

871

373

775

982

Su

gar

Can

e (

* )

8,8

11

9,1

30

9,2

58

9,5

37

9,7

48

9,9

90

10

,20

91

0,4

40

10

,66

61

0,8

95

11

,12

32

6

U

p li

mit

9,13

08,

566

8,44

18,

222

8,20

48,

201

8,24

18,

282

8,34

18,

408

-5

lo

wer

lim

it9,

130

9,94

910

,634

11,2

7411

,776

12,2

1812

,640

13,0

5013

,450

13,8

3857

coco

a (

* )

68

66

84

68

56

83

68

36

82

68

16

81

68

06

80

67

9-1

U

p li

mit

604

594

579

570

560

551

542

534

526

518

-24

lo

wer

lim

it76

477

578

779

680

581

282

082

783

383

922

Gra

pe (

* )

78

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

84

85

86

10

U

p li

mit

7472

7170

6969

6969

6868

-12

lo

wer

lim

it83

8689

9294

9698

100

102

104

33

Ap

ple

( *

)3

73

83

83

93

94

04

04

14

14

24

21

3

U

p li

mit

3635

3535

3535

3536

3636

-4

lo

wer

lim

it40

4142

4445

4546

4748

4931

Ban

an

a (

* )

48

94

87

48

54

84

48

24

80

47

94

77

47

54

74

47

2-3

U

p li

mit

455

440

429

418

409

401

393

385

378

371

-24

lo

wer

lim

it51

953

053

954

555

155

656

156

556

957

217

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

tho

usa

nd

h

ect

are

s

Page 105: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Pro

ject

ion

s o

f C

on

sum

pti

on

- B

razi

l 20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

Co

nsu

mp

tio

nU

nit

20

13/1

420

14/1

520

15/1

620

16/1

720

17/1

820

18/1

920

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4va

riat

ion

%

2013

/14

to

2023

/24

Co

tto

n900

904

908

912

916

920

924

928

932

936

939

4

U

p li

mit

808

772

746

724

705

689

674

660

648

636

-29

lo

wer

lim

it1,

000

1,04

41,

078

1,10

81,

134

1,15

91,

182

1,20

31,

223

1,24

338

Ric

e

12,0

00

12,0

23

12,0

47

12,0

70

12,0

94

12,1

17

12,1

41

12,1

64

12,1

88

12,2

11

12,2

35

2

U

p li

mit

11,4

9011

,293

11,1

4611

,027

10,9

2510

,834

10,7

5310

,679

10,6

1110

,548

-12

lo

wer

lim

it12

,557

12,8

0112

,994

13,1

6113

,310

13,4

4713

,575

13,6

9613

,811

13,9

2116

Bean

s3,4

50

3,4

63

3,4

75

3,4

88

3,5

00

3,5

13

3,5

25

3,5

38

3,5

50

3,5

63

3,5

75

4

U

p li

mit

3,02

82,

860

2,73

52,

631

2,54

12,

461

2,38

82,

321

2,25

92,

201

-36

lo

wer

lim

it3,

897

4,09

04,

240

4,36

94,

484

4,58

94,

687

4,77

94,

866

4,94

943

Co

rn

53,8

18

54,8

76

55,8

68

56,8

68

57,8

99

58,9

36

59,9

67

61,0

00

62,0

34

63,0

68

64,1

02

19

U

p li

mit

53,1

0052

,844

52,8

1052

,938

53,1

9653

,538

53,9

4554

,404

54,9

0255

,434

3

lo

wer

lim

it56

,652

58,8

9260

,927

62,8

5964

,675

66,3

9668

,055

69,6

6571

,234

72,7

7035

So

yb

ean

s 40,0

80

41,2

33

42,3

58

43,3

91

44,4

01

45,4

14

46,4

17

47,4

20

48,4

23

49,4

25

50,4

27

26

U

p li

mit

36,7

6736

,729

37,0

4437

,191

37,4

9937

,865

38,2

5638

,694

39,1

6139

,654

-1

lo

wer

lim

it45

,698

47,9

8849

,739

51,6

1253

,329

54,9

6956

,583

58,1

5259

,688

61,2

0053

So

yb

ean

s m

eal

14,1

00

14,5

29

15,0

46

15,5

48

16,0

19

16,5

38

17,0

49

17,5

43

18,0

50

18,5

59

19,0

61

35

U

p li

mit

13,8

2414

,006

14,3

0314

,575

14,8

9515

,247

15,5

9515

,958

16,3

3616

,716

19

lo

wer

lim

it15

,234

16,0

8516

,793

17,4

6318

,181

18,8

5119

,492

20,1

4320

,783

21,4

0752

So

yb

ean

s o

il5,5

00

5,5

66

5,6

42

5,7

55

5,8

80

6,0

16

6,1

61

6,3

09

6,4

61

6,6

16

6,7

72

23

U

p li

mit

5,22

25,

058

4,94

64,

847

4,77

54,

724

4,69

04,

673

4,66

84,

674

-15

lo

wer

lim

it5,

911

6,22

56,

564

6,91

37,

258

7,59

77,

928

8,25

08,

563

8,86

961

Wh

eat

12,1

92

12,4

05

12,6

17

12,8

30

13,0

42

13,2

55

13,4

68

13,6

80

13,8

93

14,1

05

14,3

18

17

U

p li

mit

11,3

6611

,149

11,0

3110

,966

10,9

3310

,924

10,9

3310

,956

10,9

9011

,034

-9

lo

wer

lim

it13

,443

14,0

8614

,628

15,1

1915

,577

16,0

1116

,428

16,8

3017

,221

17,6

0244

Ch

icken

8,6

89

8,9

76

9,2

63

9,5

51

9,8

38

10,1

25

10,4

12

10,6

99

10,9

87

11,2

74

11,5

61

33

U

p li

mit

8,33

88,

360

8,44

58,

561

8,69

78,

848

9,01

09,

181

9,35

89,

542

10

lo

wer

lim

it9,

615

10,1

6610

,656

11,1

1511

,553

11,9

7612

,389

12,7

9213

,189

13,5

8056

Beef

7,7

44

7,6

15

7,8

66

8,0

89

7,9

92

8,0

82

8,4

21

8,5

01

8,5

02

8,7

59

8,9

53

16

U

p li

mit

6,89

86,

852

6,98

06,

795

6,76

57,

090

7,16

17,

098

7,28

97,

456

-4

lo

wer

lim

it8,

332

8,88

09,

198

9,18

99,

399

9,75

29,

841

9,90

610

,230

10,4

5135

Po

rk3,0

32

3,1

20

3,2

09

3,2

97

3,3

85

3,4

74

3,5

62

3,6

50

3,7

38

3,8

27

3,9

15

29

U

p li

mit

1,49

190

447

512

6-

--

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it4,

750

5,51

36,

119

6,64

47,

117

7,55

37,

961

8,34

78,

715

9,06

819

9

Su

gar

12,2

33

12,2

61

12,6

94

12,9

63

13,2

99

13,6

07

13,9

27

14,2

42

14,5

59

14,8

75

15,1

92

24

U

p li

mit

10,8

8211

,087

11,0

4611

,155

11,2

4511

,369

11,5

0111

,647

11,8

0211

,965

-2

lo

wer

lim

it13

,640

14,3

0014

,881

15,4

4215

,970

16,4

8516

,983

17,4

7117

,949

18,4

1951

Co

ffee

20

21

21

22

22

23

24

24

25

25

26

29

U

p li

mit

2120

2121

2222

2223

2324

19

lo

wer

lim

it21

2223

2424

2526

2727

2839

Mil

k36,2

98

37,3

10

38,3

02

39,2

90

40,2

78

41,2

65

42,2

53

43,2

40

44,2

28

45,2

15

46,2

03

27

U

p li

mit

34,5

5134

,794

35,1

6135

,608

36,1

1236

,657

37,2

3437

,838

38,4

6439

,108

8

lo

wer

lim

it40

,069

41,8

1043

,420

44,9

4846

,419

47,8

4949

,246

50,6

1751

,967

53,2

9747

Pap

er

10,1

25

10,3

33

10,5

98

10,8

63

11,1

02

11,3

77

11,6

01

11,8

81

12,1

02

12,3

85

12,6

05

25

U

p li

mit

9,84

69,

953

10,1

3110

,280

10,4

8710

,639

10,8

5811

,015

11,2

4211

,406

13

lo

wer

lim

it10

,820

11,2

4311

,595

11,9

2312

,267

12,5

6212

,905

13,1

8813

,529

13,8

0536

Pu

lp6,3

27

6,3

92

6,5

31

6,6

54

6,7

59

6,8

89

7,0

01

7,1

20

7,2

41

7,3

56

7,4

76

18

U

p li

mit

5,92

36,

029

6,08

56,

161

6,24

86,

324

6,41

26,

498

6,58

46,

674

5

lo

wer

lim

it6,

862

7,03

47,

224

7,35

67,

531

7,67

87,

829

7,98

48,

129

8,27

931

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

bag

s

mil

lio

n

lite

rs

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

Page 106: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a

Co

nsu

mp

tio

nU

nit

20

13/1

420

14/1

520

15/1

620

16/1

720

17/1

820

18/1

920

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4va

riat

ion

%

2013

/14

to

2023

/24

Co

tto

n900

904

908

912

916

920

924

928

932

936

939

4

U

p li

mit

808

772

746

724

705

689

674

660

648

636

-29

lo

wer

lim

it1,

000

1,04

41,

078

1,10

81,

134

1,15

91,

182

1,20

31,

223

1,24

338

Ric

e

12,0

00

12,0

23

12,0

47

12,0

70

12,0

94

12,1

17

12,1

41

12,1

64

12,1

88

12,2

11

12,2

35

2

U

p li

mit

11,4

9011

,293

11,1

4611

,027

10,9

2510

,834

10,7

5310

,679

10,6

1110

,548

-12

lo

wer

lim

it12

,557

12,8

0112

,994

13,1

6113

,310

13,4

4713

,575

13,6

9613

,811

13,9

2116

Bean

s3,4

50

3,4

63

3,4

75

3,4

88

3,5

00

3,5

13

3,5

25

3,5

38

3,5

50

3,5

63

3,5

75

4

U

p li

mit

3,02

82,

860

2,73

52,

631

2,54

12,

461

2,38

82,

321

2,25

92,

201

-36

lo

wer

lim

it3,

897

4,09

04,

240

4,36

94,

484

4,58

94,

687

4,77

94,

866

4,94

943

Co

rn

53,8

18

54,8

76

55,8

68

56,8

68

57,8

99

58,9

36

59,9

67

61,0

00

62,0

34

63,0

68

64,1

02

19

U

p li

mit

53,1

0052

,844

52,8

1052

,938

53,1

9653

,538

53,9

4554

,404

54,9

0255

,434

3

lo

wer

lim

it56

,652

58,8

9260

,927

62,8

5964

,675

66,3

9668

,055

69,6

6571

,234

72,7

7035

So

yb

ean

s 40,0

80

41,2

33

42,3

58

43,3

91

44,4

01

45,4

14

46,4

17

47,4

20

48,4

23

49,4

25

50,4

27

26

U

p li

mit

36,7

6736

,729

37,0

4437

,191

37,4

9937

,865

38,2

5638

,694

39,1

6139

,654

-1

lo

wer

lim

it45

,698

47,9

8849

,739

51,6

1253

,329

54,9

6956

,583

58,1

5259

,688

61,2

0053

So

yb

ean

s m

eal

14,1

00

14,5

29

15,0

46

15,5

48

16,0

19

16,5

38

17,0

49

17,5

43

18,0

50

18,5

59

19,0

61

35

U

p li

mit

13,8

2414

,006

14,3

0314

,575

14,8

9515

,247

15,5

9515

,958

16,3

3616

,716

19

lo

wer

lim

it15

,234

16,0

8516

,793

17,4

6318

,181

18,8

5119

,492

20,1

4320

,783

21,4

0752

So

yb

ean

s o

il5,5

00

5,5

66

5,6

42

5,7

55

5,8

80

6,0

16

6,1

61

6,3

09

6,4

61

6,6

16

6,7

72

23

U

p li

mit

5,22

25,

058

4,94

64,

847

4,77

54,

724

4,69

04,

673

4,66

84,

674

-15

lo

wer

lim

it5,

911

6,22

56,

564

6,91

37,

258

7,59

77,

928

8,25

08,

563

8,86

961

Wh

eat

12,1

92

12,4

05

12,6

17

12,8

30

13,0

42

13,2

55

13,4

68

13,6

80

13,8

93

14,1

05

14,3

18

17

U

p li

mit

11,3

6611

,149

11,0

3110

,966

10,9

3310

,924

10,9

3310

,956

10,9

9011

,034

-9

lo

wer

lim

it13

,443

14,0

8614

,628

15,1

1915

,577

16,0

1116

,428

16,8

3017

,221

17,6

0244

Ch

icken

8,6

89

8,9

76

9,2

63

9,5

51

9,8

38

10,1

25

10,4

12

10,6

99

10,9

87

11,2

74

11,5

61

33

U

p li

mit

8,33

88,

360

8,44

58,

561

8,69

78,

848

9,01

09,

181

9,35

89,

542

10

lo

wer

lim

it9,

615

10,1

6610

,656

11,1

1511

,553

11,9

7612

,389

12,7

9213

,189

13,5

8056

Beef

7,7

44

7,6

15

7,8

66

8,0

89

7,9

92

8,0

82

8,4

21

8,5

01

8,5

02

8,7

59

8,9

53

16

U

p li

mit

6,89

86,

852

6,98

06,

795

6,76

57,

090

7,16

17,

098

7,28

97,

456

-4

lo

wer

lim

it8,

332

8,88

09,

198

9,18

99,

399

9,75

29,

841

9,90

610

,230

10,4

5135

Po

rk3,0

32

3,1

20

3,2

09

3,2

97

3,3

85

3,4

74

3,5

62

3,6

50

3,7

38

3,8

27

3,9

15

29

U

p li

mit

1,49

190

447

512

6-

--

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it4,

750

5,51

36,

119

6,64

47,

117

7,55

37,

961

8,34

78,

715

9,06

819

9

Su

gar

12,2

33

12,2

61

12,6

94

12,9

63

13,2

99

13,6

07

13,9

27

14,2

42

14,5

59

14,8

75

15,1

92

24

U

p li

mit

10,8

8211

,087

11,0

4611

,155

11,2

4511

,369

11,5

0111

,647

11,8

0211

,965

-2

lo

wer

lim

it13

,640

14,3

0014

,881

15,4

4215

,970

16,4

8516

,983

17,4

7117

,949

18,4

1951

Co

ffee

20

21

21

22

22

23

24

24

25

25

26

29

U

p li

mit

2120

2121

2222

2223

2324

19

lo

wer

lim

it21

2223

2424

2526

2727

2839

Mil

k36,2

98

37,3

10

38,3

02

39,2

90

40,2

78

41,2

65

42,2

53

43,2

40

44,2

28

45,2

15

46,2

03

27

U

p li

mit

34,5

5134

,794

35,1

6135

,608

36,1

1236

,657

37,2

3437

,838

38,4

6439

,108

8

lo

wer

lim

it40

,069

41,8

1043

,420

44,9

4846

,419

47,8

4949

,246

50,6

1751

,967

53,2

9747

Pap

er

10,1

25

10,3

33

10,5

98

10,8

63

11,1

02

11,3

77

11,6

01

11,8

81

12,1

02

12,3

85

12,6

05

25

U

p li

mit

9,84

69,

953

10,1

3110

,280

10,4

8710

,639

10,8

5811

,015

11,2

4211

,406

13

lo

wer

lim

it10

,820

11,2

4311

,595

11,9

2312

,267

12,5

6212

,905

13,1

8813

,529

13,8

0536

Pu

lp6,3

27

6,3

92

6,5

31

6,6

54

6,7

59

6,8

89

7,0

01

7,1

20

7,2

41

7,3

56

7,4

76

18

U

p li

mit

5,92

36,

029

6,08

56,

161

6,24

86,

324

6,41

26,

498

6,58

46,

674

5

lo

wer

lim

it6,

862

7,03

47,

224

7,35

67,

531

7,67

87,

829

7,98

48,

129

8,27

931

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

bag

s

mil

lio

n

lite

rs

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

Page 107: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Pro

ject

ion

s o

f Ex

po

rt -

Bra

zil 2

013

/20

14 t

o 2

023

/20

24

Exp

ort

Un

it

2013/1

42014/1

52015/1

62016/1

72017/1

82018/1

92019/2

02020/2

12021/2

22022/2

32023/2

4vari

ati

on

%

2013/1

4 t

o

2023/2

4

Co

tto

n575

607

639

671

702

734

766

798

830

862

893

55.4

U

p li

mit

291

192

123

7128

--

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it92

31,

085

1,21

81,

334

1,44

01,

540

1,63

41,

723

1,80

91,

892

229.

1

Co

rn

21,0

00

22,8

06

25,0

01

25,9

10

26,7

90

28,0

18

29,1

92

30,2

98

31,4

25

32,5

65

33,6

98

60.5

U

p li

mit

15,3

4814

,885

14,6

7614

,317

14,2

8714

,368

14,4

7614

,648

14,8

8315

,158

-27.

8

lo

wer

lim

it30

,264

35,1

1737

,144

39,2

6441

,748

44,0

1646

,121

48,2

0150

,247

52,2

3714

8.7

So

yb

ean

s 45,2

97

47,2

92

49,2

86

51,2

81

53,2

76

55,2

70

57,2

65

59,2

60

61,2

54

63,2

49

65,2

44

44.0

U

p li

mit

41,8

1541

,541

41,7

9542

,322

43,0

2443

,849

44,7

6945

,763

46,8

1847

,924

5.8

lo

wer

lim

it52

,768

57,0

3260

,767

64,2

2967

,517

70,6

8073

,750

76,7

4579

,679

82,5

6382

.3

So

yb

ean

s m

eal

13,5

79

14,1

66

14,3

89

14,7

15

14,7

83

14,9

39

15,1

28

15,2

57

15,3

94

15,5

57

15,7

01

15.6

U

p li

mit

12,4

0611

,675

11,2

7710

,746

10,3

3310

,027

9,71

39,

430

9,20

18,

980

-33.

9

lo

wer

lim

it15

,926

17,1

0318

,154

18,8

2119

,545

20,2

3020

,801

21,3

5821

,912

22,4

2265

.1

So

yb

ean

s o

il1,3

74

1,5

30

1,5

62

1,5

98

1,6

22

1,6

31

1,6

37

1,6

37

1,6

35

1,6

31

1,6

26

18.4

U

p li

mit

941

701

509

299

97-

--

--

-

lo

wer

lim

it2,

119

2,42

22,

686

2,94

53,

164

3,36

93,

556

3,72

73,

887

4,03

619

3.9

Ch

icken

4,0

02

4,1

81

4,3

23

4,5

27

4,6

80

4,8

90

5,0

46

5,2

58

5,4

15

5,6

27

5,7

84

44.5

U

p li

mit

3,68

93,

758

3,67

03,

747

3,72

73,

816

3,83

73,

936

3,98

44,

090

2.2

lo

wer

lim

it4,

674

4,88

75,

384

5,61

36,

054

6,27

66,

679

6,89

37,

271

7,47

886

.9

Beef

2,0

68

2,1

43

2,2

23

2,3

05

2,3

88

2,4

71

2,5

55

2,6

38

2,7

22

2,8

05

2,8

89

39.7

U

p li

mit

1,77

01,

584

1,44

51,

341

1,26

11,

199

1,15

11,

113

1,08

41,

062

-48.

6

lo

wer

lim

it2,

515

2,86

13,

165

3,43

53,

682

3,91

04,

125

4,33

04,

526

4,71

512

8.1

Po

rk534

559

584

609

634

659

684

709

734

759

784

46.9

U

p li

mit

418

385

365

352

344

339

336

335

336

338

-36.

6

lo

wer

lim

it70

078

385

391

697

41,

029

1,08

21,

133

1,18

21,

230

130.

4

Co

ffee

32

33

33

34

35

36

37

37

38

39

40

24.0

U

p li

mit

2626

2626

2626

2627

2727

-15.

7

lo

wer

lim

it39

4142

4445

4748

5051

5263

.7

Su

gar

27,1

54

27,8

24

29,2

07

30,3

52

31,5

77

32,7

75

33,9

82

35,1

86

36,3

91

37,5

96

38,8

01

42.9

U

p li

mit

23,0

9623

,519

23,5

7723

,947

24,3

5224

,843

25,3

8025

,962

26,5

7827

,224

0.3

lo

wer

lim

it32

,552

34,8

9637

,128

39,2

0841

,198

43,1

2244

,993

46,8

2148

,614

50,3

7885

.5

Su

co d

e O

ran

ge

2,0

94

2,1

79

2,2

15

2,2

72

2,3

20

2,3

72

2,4

23

2,4

74

2,5

25

2,5

75

2,6

26

25.4

U

p li

mit

1,91

01,

893

1,91

41,

926

1,94

61,

966

1,98

92,

013

2,03

82,

065

-1.4

lo

wer

lim

it2,

448

2,53

72,

631

2,71

52,

799

2,88

02,

959

3,03

63,

112

3,18

752

.2

Mil

k138

142

147

152

157

161

166

171

176

180

185

34.7

U

p li

mit

--

--

--

--

--

-

lo

wer

lim

it65

777

787

997

01,

052

1,12

81,

200

1,26

71,

330

1,39

191

1.6

Pap

er

1,9

37

1,9

95

2,0

55

2,0

79

2,1

22

2,1

42

2,1

90

2,2

13

2,2

61

2,2

84

2,3

32

20.4

U

p li

mit

1,73

41,

640

1,58

11,

532

1,50

21,

483

1,46

41,

454

1,44

01,

435

-25.

9

lo

wer

lim

it2,

257

2,47

02,

576

2,71

22,

782

2,89

72,

961

3,06

83,

128

3,22

966

.7

Pu

lp9,8

53

10,2

40

10,6

21

11,0

22

11,4

03

11,7

94

12,1

83

12,5

69

12,9

59

13,3

47

13,7

35

39.4

U

p li

mit

9,24

79,

326

9,51

79,

688

9,89

410

,118

10,3

4510

,590

10,8

3911

,096

12.6

lo

wer

lim

it11

,233

11,9

1612

,527

13,1

1713

,694

14,2

4814

,794

15,3

2915

,855

16,3

7566

.2

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

lite

rs

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

bag

s

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

Page 108: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a

Exp

ort

Un

it

2013/1

42014/1

52015/1

62016/1

72017/1

82018/1

92019/2

02020/2

12021/2

22022/2

32023/2

4vari

ati

on

%

2013/1

4 t

o

2023/2

4

Co

tto

n575

607

639

671

702

734

766

798

830

862

893

55.4

U

p li

mit

291

192

123

7128

--

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it92

31,

085

1,21

81,

334

1,44

01,

540

1,63

41,

723

1,80

91,

892

229.

1

Co

rn

21,0

00

22,8

06

25,0

01

25,9

10

26,7

90

28,0

18

29,1

92

30,2

98

31,4

25

32,5

65

33,6

98

60.5

U

p li

mit

15,3

4814

,885

14,6

7614

,317

14,2

8714

,368

14,4

7614

,648

14,8

8315

,158

-27.

8

lo

wer

lim

it30

,264

35,1

1737

,144

39,2

6441

,748

44,0

1646

,121

48,2

0150

,247

52,2

3714

8.7

So

yb

ean

s 45,2

97

47,2

92

49,2

86

51,2

81

53,2

76

55,2

70

57,2

65

59,2

60

61,2

54

63,2

49

65,2

44

44.0

U

p li

mit

41,8

1541

,541

41,7

9542

,322

43,0

2443

,849

44,7

6945

,763

46,8

1847

,924

5.8

lo

wer

lim

it52

,768

57,0

3260

,767

64,2

2967

,517

70,6

8073

,750

76,7

4579

,679

82,5

6382

.3

So

yb

ean

s m

eal

13,5

79

14,1

66

14,3

89

14,7

15

14,7

83

14,9

39

15,1

28

15,2

57

15,3

94

15,5

57

15,7

01

15.6

U

p li

mit

12,4

0611

,675

11,2

7710

,746

10,3

3310

,027

9,71

39,

430

9,20

18,

980

-33.

9

lo

wer

lim

it15

,926

17,1

0318

,154

18,8

2119

,545

20,2

3020

,801

21,3

5821

,912

22,4

2265

.1

So

yb

ean

s o

il1,3

74

1,5

30

1,5

62

1,5

98

1,6

22

1,6

31

1,6

37

1,6

37

1,6

35

1,6

31

1,6

26

18.4

U

p li

mit

941

701

509

299

97-

--

--

-

lo

wer

lim

it2,

119

2,42

22,

686

2,94

53,

164

3,36

93,

556

3,72

73,

887

4,03

619

3.9

Ch

icken

4,0

02

4,1

81

4,3

23

4,5

27

4,6

80

4,8

90

5,0

46

5,2

58

5,4

15

5,6

27

5,7

84

44.5

U

p li

mit

3,68

93,

758

3,67

03,

747

3,72

73,

816

3,83

73,

936

3,98

44,

090

2.2

lo

wer

lim

it4,

674

4,88

75,

384

5,61

36,

054

6,27

66,

679

6,89

37,

271

7,47

886

.9

Beef

2,0

68

2,1

43

2,2

23

2,3

05

2,3

88

2,4

71

2,5

55

2,6

38

2,7

22

2,8

05

2,8

89

39.7

U

p li

mit

1,77

01,

584

1,44

51,

341

1,26

11,

199

1,15

11,

113

1,08

41,

062

-48.

6

lo

wer

lim

it2,

515

2,86

13,

165

3,43

53,

682

3,91

04,

125

4,33

04,

526

4,71

512

8.1

Po

rk534

559

584

609

634

659

684

709

734

759

784

46.9

U

p li

mit

418

385

365

352

344

339

336

335

336

338

-36.

6

lo

wer

lim

it70

078

385

391

697

41,

029

1,08

21,

133

1,18

21,

230

130.

4

Co

ffee

32

33

33

34

35

36

37

37

38

39

40

24.0

U

p li

mit

2626

2626

2626

2627

2727

-15.

7

lo

wer

lim

it39

4142

4445

4748

5051

5263

.7

Su

gar

27,1

54

27,8

24

29,2

07

30,3

52

31,5

77

32,7

75

33,9

82

35,1

86

36,3

91

37,5

96

38,8

01

42.9

U

p li

mit

23,0

9623

,519

23,5

7723

,947

24,3

5224

,843

25,3

8025

,962

26,5

7827

,224

0.3

lo

wer

lim

it32

,552

34,8

9637

,128

39,2

0841

,198

43,1

2244

,993

46,8

2148

,614

50,3

7885

.5

Su

co d

e O

ran

ge

2,0

94

2,1

79

2,2

15

2,2

72

2,3

20

2,3

72

2,4

23

2,4

74

2,5

25

2,5

75

2,6

26

25.4

U

p li

mit

1,91

01,

893

1,91

41,

926

1,94

61,

966

1,98

92,

013

2,03

82,

065

-1.4

lo

wer

lim

it2,

448

2,53

72,

631

2,71

52,

799

2,88

02,

959

3,03

63,

112

3,18

752

.2

Mil

k138

142

147

152

157

161

166

171

176

180

185

34.7

U

p li

mit

--

--

--

--

--

-

lo

wer

lim

it65

777

787

997

01,

052

1,12

81,

200

1,26

71,

330

1,39

191

1.6

Pap

er

1,9

37

1,9

95

2,0

55

2,0

79

2,1

22

2,1

42

2,1

90

2,2

13

2,2

61

2,2

84

2,3

32

20.4

U

p li

mit

1,73

41,

640

1,58

11,

532

1,50

21,

483

1,46

41,

454

1,44

01,

435

-25.

9

lo

wer

lim

it2,

257

2,47

02,

576

2,71

22,

782

2,89

72,

961

3,06

83,

128

3,22

966

.7

Pu

lp9,8

53

10,2

40

10,6

21

11,0

22

11,4

03

11,7

94

12,1

83

12,5

69

12,9

59

13,3

47

13,7

35

39.4

U

p li

mit

9,24

79,

326

9,51

79,

688

9,89

410

,118

10,3

4510

,590

10,8

3911

,096

12.6

lo

wer

lim

it11

,233

11,9

1612

,527

13,1

1713

,694

14,2

4814

,794

15,3

2915

,855

16,3

7566

.2

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

lite

rs

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

mil

lio

ns

bag

s

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

Page 109: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Pro

ject

ion

s o

f Im

po

rt -

Bra

zil 2

013

/20

14 t

o 2

023

/20

24

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a

Imp

ort

Un

it

20

13

/14

20

14

/15

20

15

/16

20

16

/17

20

17

/18

20

18

/19

20

19

/20

20

20

/21

20

21

/22

20

22

/23

20

23

/24

vari

ati

on

%

20

13

/14

to

2

02

3/2

4

Ric

e

1,0

00

96

79

34

90

18

68

83

68

03

77

07

37

70

46

71

-32

.9

U

p li

mit

165

--

--

--

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it1,

769

2,06

92,

291

2,47

32,

629

2,76

82,

892

3,00

63,

111

3,20

822

0.8

Bean

s3

00

30

73

14

32

23

29

33

63

43

35

03

58

36

53

72

24

.0

U

p li

mit

178

132

9871

4727

9-

--

-

lo

wer

lim

it43

649

754

558

762

565

969

272

375

278

016

0.0

Wh

eat

5,5

00

5,4

78

5,4

56

5,4

33

5,4

11

5,3

89

5,3

67

5,3

45

5,3

22

5,3

00

5,2

78

-4.0

U

p li

mit

3,75

43,

018

2,44

81,

964

1,53

51,

145

785

448

130

--

lo

wer

lim

it7,

201

7,89

38,

418

8,85

89,

243

9,58

89,

904

10,1

9710

,470

10,7

2895

.1

Mil

k1

,05

71

,04

71

,03

71

,02

81

,01

81

,00

89

99

98

99

79

97

09

60

-9.2

U

p li

mit

--

--

--

--

--

-

lo

wer

lim

it2,

820

3,20

93,

535

3,82

14,

079

4,31

64,

535

4,74

04,

934

5,11

838

4.4

mil

lio

ns

lite

rs

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

tho

usa

nd

to

ns

Page 110: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a*

It is

a r

eg

ion

lo

cate

d a

t th

e C

en

tre –

No

rth

east

of

Bra

zil

an

d f

orm

ed

by m

un

icip

alit

ies

of

Mara

nh

ão

, T

ocan

tin

s, P

iau

í an

d B

ah

ia.

Bra

zil –

MA

TOP

IBA

Pro

du

ctio

n P

roje

ctio

ns

an

d P

lan

ted

Áre

a -

20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

Pro

du

ctio

n2

01

3/1

42

01

4/1

52

01

5/1

62

01

6/1

72

01

7/1

82

01

8/1

92

01

9/2

02

02

0/2

12

02

1/2

22

02

2/2

32

02

3/2

4vari

ati

on

%

20

13

/14

to

2

02

3/2

4

Gra

ins

20

,36

81

6,9

66

16

,64

72

0,6

26

22

,02

91

9,8

47

19

,81

32

2,7

73

23

,93

92

2,6

07

21

U

p li

mit

17,6

9313

,183

12,8

3916

,792

17,5

5514

,813

14,7

2417

,629

18,4

0216

,703

-10

lo

wer

lim

it23

,043

20,7

4820

,456

24,4

6026

,503

24,8

8024

,902

27,9

1729

,476

28,5

1053

Pla

nte

d A

rea

20

13

/14

20

14

/15

20

15

/16

20

16

/17

20

17

/18

20

18

/19

20

19

/20

20

20

/21

20

21

/22

20

22

/23

20

23

/24

vari

ati

on

%

20

13

/14

to

2

02

3/2

4

Gra

ins

6,9

98

7,5

70

7,2

45

7,7

95

7,4

63

8,0

11

7,6

78

8,2

26

7,8

92

8,4

40

16

U

p li

mit

6,03

66,

554

5,76

86,

274

5,59

46,

106

5,48

56,

002

5,41

75,

938

-18

lo

wer

lim

it7,

959

8,58

58,

722

9,31

69,

331

9,91

69,

871

10,4

4910

,367

10,9

4251

18

,62

3

7,2

59

Page 111: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Fo

nte

: A

GE

/Map

a e

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a*

Reg

ião

lo

caliz

ad

a n

o B

rasi

l cen

tral fo

rmad

a p

elo

s est

ad

os

de M

A, T

O, P

I, B

A

Bra

zil –

MA

TOP

IBA

Pro

du

ctio

n P

roje

ctio

ns

- 20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a*

It is

a r

eg

ion

lo

cate

d a

t th

e C

en

tre –

No

rth

east

of

Bra

zil

an

d f

orm

ed

by m

un

icip

alit

ies

of

Mara

nh

ão

, T

ocan

tin

s, P

iau

í an

d B

ah

ia.

Pro

du

ctio

n2

01

3/1

42

01

4/1

52

01

5/1

62

01

6/1

72

01

7/1

82

01

8/1

92

01

9/2

02

02

0/2

12

02

1/2

22

02

2/2

32

02

3/2

4vari

ati

on

%

20

13

/14

to

2

02

3/2

4

Bals

as

- M

A4

85

50

75

29

55

15

73

59

56

17

63

96

61

68

24

7

Up

lim

it43

444

846

748

650

352

254

156

057

959

829

lo

wer

lim

it53

556

659

261

664

266

869

271

774

276

765

Cam

po

s Li

nd

os

- TO

19

42

03

21

22

21

23

02

39

24

82

57

26

62

75

49

U

p li

mit

153

156

159

163

167

172

177

182

187

193

4

lo

wer

lim

it23

625

026

527

929

330

631

933

234

535

894

Uru

çuí

- PI

28

32

93

30

33

13

32

33

33

34

33

53

36

23

72

36

U

p li

mit

163

155

148

143

140

137

135

134

133

133

-51

lo

wer

lim

it40

343

245

848

250

652

955

057

159

261

212

4

Barr

eir

as

- B

A3

55

35

83

59

36

13

61

36

23

62

36

23

63

36

33

U

p li

mit

188

191

192

193

194

195

195

195

196

196

-45

lo

wer

lim

it52

252

552

652

852

852

952

953

053

053

050

Form

osa

do

Rio

Pre

to -

BA

1,7

84

1,9

79

2,2

31

2,4

26

2,6

78

2,8

73

3,1

24

3,3

20

3,5

71

3,7

67

14

6

Up

lim

it1,

334

1,39

81,

430

1,45

41,

459

1,45

01,

431

1,39

41,

352

1,28

9-1

6

lo

wer

lim

it2,

234

2,56

03,

031

3,39

83,

896

4,29

54,

818

5,24

65,

790

6,24

430

8

São

Desi

déri

o -

BA

86

69

03

94

09

78

1,0

15

1,0

52

1,0

89

1,1

26

1,1

63

1,2

00

45

U

p li

mit

483

461

445

435

429

426

425

426

429

433

-48

lo

wer

lim

it1,

250

1,34

61,

435

1,52

01,

600

1,67

81,

753

1,82

61,

897

1,96

713

7

So

yb

ean

s -

Sele

cted

Mu

nic

ipali

ties

- th

ou

san

d t

on

s

1,5

32

82

9

46

4

18

5

27

3

35

3

Page 112: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Bra

zil –

MA

TOP

IBA

Pro

ject

ion

s f

Pla

nte

d A

rea

- 20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a*

It is

a r

eg

ion

lo

cate

d a

t th

e C

en

tre –

No

rth

east

of

Bra

zil

an

d f

orm

ed

by m

un

icip

alit

ies

of

Mara

nh

ão

, T

ocan

tin

s, P

iau

í an

d B

ah

ia.

Pla

nte

d A

rea

2013/1

42014/1

52015/1

62016/1

72017/1

82018/1

92019/2

02020/2

12021/2

22022/2

32023/2

4vari

ati

on

%

2013/1

4 t

o

2023/2

4

Bals

as

- M

A157

163

170

177

184

190

197

204

211

217

45

U

p li

mit

134

137

141

145

149

154

158

163

167

172

15

lo

wer

lim

it17

918

919

920

921

822

723

624

525

426

275

Cam

po

s Li

nd

os

- TO

60

63

65

68

71

74

77

80

83

85

49

U

p li

mit

4342

4040

3939

4040

4041

-29

lo

wer

lim

it77

8491

9710

310

911

411

912

513

012

6

Uru

çuí

- PI

104

109

114

119

123

128

133

138

142

147

48

U

p li

mit

7676

7778

8081

8386

8890

-9

lo

wer

lim

it13

314

215

115

916

717

518

219

019

720

410

6

Barr

eir

as

- B

A134

139

143

145

147

148

148

149

149

149

17

U

p li

mit

7073

7678

7980

8182

8282

-35

lo

wer

lim

it19

920

621

021

221

421

521

621

621

621

770

Form

osa

do

Rio

Pre

to -

BA

327

339

371

385

411

415

435

437

459

466

51

U

p li

mit

198

192

207

217

235

235

244

240

249

250

-19

lo

wer

lim

it45

748

653

555

458

859

662

663

567

068

312

1

São

Desi

déri

o -

BA

265

266

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

4

Up

lim

it-

--

--

--

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it83

792

71,

006

1,07

71,

143

1,20

51,

262

1,31

71,

369

1,41

943

7

So

yb

ean

s -

Sele

cted

Mu

nic

ipali

ties

- th

ou

san

d H

ect

are

s

264

150

58

99

127

309

Page 113: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Bra

zil –

Reg

ion

s

Pro

du

ctio

n P

roje

ctio

ns

– Se

lect

ed R

egio

ns

- 20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

Pro

du

ctio

n2013/1

42014/1

52015/1

62016/1

72017/1

82018/1

92019/2

02020/2

12021/2

22022/2

32023/2

4vari

ati

on

%

2013/1

4 t

o

2023/2

4

RS

8,6

91

8,9

52

9,0

35

9,2

56

9,4

62

9,7

20

9,9

14

10,1

25

10,3

20

10,5

40

25

U

p li

mit

7,61

07,

614

7,60

27,

789

7,91

78,

109

8,22

18,

374

8,51

58,

686

3

lo

wer

lim

it9,

772

10,2

8910

,467

10,7

2211

,006

11,3

3011

,608

11,8

7512

,125

12,3

9547

GO

71,0

60

73,3

67

75,9

97

78,8

13

81,7

38

84,7

26

87,7

50

90,7

95

93,8

53

96,9

18

40

U

p li

mit

64,3

2462

,244

60,8

8360

,082

59,7

2959

,733

60,0

2260

,539

61,2

4462

,102

-10

lo

wer

lim

it77

,795

84,4

9091

,110

97,5

4410

3,74

710

9,71

911

5,47

812

1,05

112

6,46

213

1,73

390

MG

80,6

79

84,2

01

87,5

04

90,6

86

93,7

99

96,8

73

99,9

27

102,9

68

106,0

03

109,0

35

42

U

p li

mit

74,7

3073

,803

73,0

3272

,539

72,3

4472

,424

72,7

4373

,266

73,9

6174

,803

-3

lo

wer

lim

it86

,628

94,5

9910

1,97

710

8,83

211

5,25

312

1,32

312

7,11

113

2,67

113

8,04

514

3,26

687

MT

18,5

77

18,3

17

20,1

64

21,6

50

22,2

72

21,8

65

22,1

10

23,1

39

24,4

59

25,0

80

31

U

p li

mit

16,2

4715

,234

16,8

3318

,317

18,8

7218

,166

17,9

6818

,833

20,1

0420

,666

8

lo

wer

lim

it20

,908

21,4

0023

,496

24,9

8225

,672

25,5

6426

,252

27,4

4428

,815

29,4

9454

PR

50,7

90

52,4

33

54,0

94

55,7

58

57,4

22

59,0

86

60,7

50

62,4

14

64,0

78

65,7

42

34

U

p li

mit

43,8

6640

,872

39,1

3038

,012

37,2

7336

,791

36,4

9836

,352

36,3

2436

,393

-26

lo

wer

lim

it57

,714

63,9

9369

,059

73,5

0477

,571

81,3

8185

,002

88,4

7691

,833

95,0

9293

SP

429,5

62

392,2

91

446,6

15

432,6

16

482,1

63

458,7

14

505,1

25

481,2

80

527,6

24

504,4

06

25

U

p li

mit

389,

475

342,

873

360,

283

342,

063

385,

109

361,

427

402,

575

378,

470

417,

973

394,

172

-3

lo

wer

lim

it46

9,64

944

1,70

953

2,94

652

3,16

957

9,21

855

6,00

260

7,67

458

4,09

063

7,27

661

4,64

052

MG

7,5

90

7,9

67

7,8

58

8,0

16

8,3

39

8,4

81

8,5

94

8,8

04

9,0

01

9,1

54

32

U

p li

mit

6,58

16,

728

6,58

36,

621

6,77

96,

835

6,87

06,

979

7,08

67,

163

3

lo

wer

lim

it8,

600

9,20

69,

132

9,41

19,

898

10,1

2710

,317

10,6

2910

,917

11,1

4560

MT

21,1

87

21,0

77

22,6

46

21,8

15

25,5

60

23,7

56

26,5

53

25,9

99

28,6

55

27,3

16

62

U

p li

mit

16,3

5515

,549

14,7

2613

,271

15,0

5612

,781

14,0

1813

,022

14,3

1712

,613

-25

lo

wer

lim

it26

,018

26,6

0530

,566

30,3

6036

,065

34,7

3139

,089

38,9

7642

,992

42,0

1915

0

PR

16,6

52

15,6

52

18,6

17

17,6

63

19,2

65

17,6

07

19,6

92

18,7

43

20,9

76

19,6

52

28

U

p li

mit

12,7

1411

,213

13,7

1712

,077

13,1

8211

,359

12,8

1711

,522

13,4

2211

,838

-23

lo

wer

lim

it20

,589

20,0

9023

,517

23,2

4925

,348

23,8

5426

,567

25,9

6528

,531

27,4

6680

BA

3,6

00

3,3

56

3,4

43

3,8

14

3,8

65

3,8

46

4,0

61

4,2

39

4,2

76

4,3

88

36

U

p li

mit

4,18

74,

053

4,14

44,

583

4,74

64,

755

4,99

85,

242

5,32

65,

466

69

lo

wer

lim

it3,

012

2,65

82,

742

3,04

52,

984

2,93

63,

125

3,23

53,

225

3,31

13

MT

28,3

15

29,1

81

30,3

17

31,4

30

32,5

26

33,6

28

34,7

30

35,8

31

36,9

33

38,0

35

41

U

p li

mit

25,8

1225

,598

26,0

3226

,524

27,0

6527

,666

28,3

0528

,975

29,6

7130

,388

13

lo

wer

lim

it30

,818

32,7

6434

,601

36,3

3637

,987

39,5

9041

,155

42,6

8744

,195

45,6

8169

PR

16,1

55

14,8

55

17,4

42

16,5

34

17,9

82

17,5

38

19,1

66

18,6

53

20,0

45

19,7

56

34

U

p li

mit

13,7

6712

,113

14,5

4013

,588

14,9

2614

,454

15,9

9715

,441

16,7

9016

,475

12

lo

wer

lim

it18

,543

17,5

9720

,345

19,4

8021

,039

20,6

2222

,334

21,8

6523

,299

23,0

3756

RS

13,0

86

13,4

39

13,7

91

14,1

43

14,4

95

14,8

47

15,1

99

15,5

51

15,9

04

16,2

56

28

U

p li

mit

7,44

75,

463

4,02

32,

864

1,88

51,

033

279

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it18

,726

21,4

1423

,559

25,4

2227

,105

28,6

6130

,120

31,5

0232

,822

34,0

8916

8

PR

3,8

99

3,9

67

4,1

55

4,2

70

4,4

30

4,5

62

4,7

12

4,8

51

4,9

96

5,1

37

34

U

p li

mit

1,86

31,

494

1,37

41,

178

1,07

595

287

078

772

466

5-8

3

lo

wer

lim

it5,

935

6,44

06,

936

7,36

37,

786

8,17

38,

554

8,91

59,

269

9,61

015

1

RS

2,0

82

3,0

53

2,2

17

3,2

59

2,4

09

3,4

15

2,5

64

3,5

86

2,7

40

3,7

55

26

U

p li

mit

1,01

01,

835

779

1,79

670

41,

659

616

1,60

858

61,

569

-47

lo

wer

lim

it3,

155

4,27

03,

656

4,72

14,

115

5,17

04,

513

5,56

54,

894

5,94

199

RS

807

803

827

836

853

865

880

894

908

922

21

U

p li

mit

651

631

618

607

601

594

590

587

584

583

-23

lo

wer

lim

it96

497

61,

036

1,06

51,

105

1,13

71,

170

1,20

11,

232

1,26

266

Gra

pe -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Ric

e -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Wh

eat

- th

ou

san

d t

on

s

So

yb

ean

s -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Co

rn -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Su

gar

Can

e -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

3,8

25

2,9

79

760

8,4

34

16,8

39

15,2

95

3,2

29

27,0

02

14,7

41

12,7

34

69,3

07

76,7

41

19,1

53

49,2

27

404,6

80

6,9

57

Page 114: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a

Pro

du

ctio

n2013/1

42014/1

52015/1

62016/1

72017/1

82018/1

92019/2

02020/2

12021/2

22022/2

32023/2

4vari

ati

on

%

2013/1

4 t

o

2023/2

4

RS

8,6

91

8,9

52

9,0

35

9,2

56

9,4

62

9,7

20

9,9

14

10,1

25

10,3

20

10,5

40

25

U

p li

mit

7,61

07,

614

7,60

27,

789

7,91

78,

109

8,22

18,

374

8,51

58,

686

3

lo

wer

lim

it9,

772

10,2

8910

,467

10,7

2211

,006

11,3

3011

,608

11,8

7512

,125

12,3

9547

GO

71,0

60

73,3

67

75,9

97

78,8

13

81,7

38

84,7

26

87,7

50

90,7

95

93,8

53

96,9

18

40

U

p li

mit

64,3

2462

,244

60,8

8360

,082

59,7

2959

,733

60,0

2260

,539

61,2

4462

,102

-10

lo

wer

lim

it77

,795

84,4

9091

,110

97,5

4410

3,74

710

9,71

911

5,47

812

1,05

112

6,46

213

1,73

390

MG

80,6

79

84,2

01

87,5

04

90,6

86

93,7

99

96,8

73

99,9

27

102,9

68

106,0

03

109,0

35

42

U

p li

mit

74,7

3073

,803

73,0

3272

,539

72,3

4472

,424

72,7

4373

,266

73,9

6174

,803

-3

lo

wer

lim

it86

,628

94,5

9910

1,97

710

8,83

211

5,25

312

1,32

312

7,11

113

2,67

113

8,04

514

3,26

687

MT

18,5

77

18,3

17

20,1

64

21,6

50

22,2

72

21,8

65

22,1

10

23,1

39

24,4

59

25,0

80

31

U

p li

mit

16,2

4715

,234

16,8

3318

,317

18,8

7218

,166

17,9

6818

,833

20,1

0420

,666

8

lo

wer

lim

it20

,908

21,4

0023

,496

24,9

8225

,672

25,5

6426

,252

27,4

4428

,815

29,4

9454

PR

50,7

90

52,4

33

54,0

94

55,7

58

57,4

22

59,0

86

60,7

50

62,4

14

64,0

78

65,7

42

34

U

p li

mit

43,8

6640

,872

39,1

3038

,012

37,2

7336

,791

36,4

9836

,352

36,3

2436

,393

-26

lo

wer

lim

it57

,714

63,9

9369

,059

73,5

0477

,571

81,3

8185

,002

88,4

7691

,833

95,0

9293

SP

429,5

62

392,2

91

446,6

15

432,6

16

482,1

63

458,7

14

505,1

25

481,2

80

527,6

24

504,4

06

25

U

p li

mit

389,

475

342,

873

360,

283

342,

063

385,

109

361,

427

402,

575

378,

470

417,

973

394,

172

-3

lo

wer

lim

it46

9,64

944

1,70

953

2,94

652

3,16

957

9,21

855

6,00

260

7,67

458

4,09

063

7,27

661

4,64

052

MG

7,5

90

7,9

67

7,8

58

8,0

16

8,3

39

8,4

81

8,5

94

8,8

04

9,0

01

9,1

54

32

U

p li

mit

6,58

16,

728

6,58

36,

621

6,77

96,

835

6,87

06,

979

7,08

67,

163

3

lo

wer

lim

it8,

600

9,20

69,

132

9,41

19,

898

10,1

2710

,317

10,6

2910

,917

11,1

4560

MT

21,1

87

21,0

77

22,6

46

21,8

15

25,5

60

23,7

56

26,5

53

25,9

99

28,6

55

27,3

16

62

U

p li

mit

16,3

5515

,549

14,7

2613

,271

15,0

5612

,781

14,0

1813

,022

14,3

1712

,613

-25

lo

wer

lim

it26

,018

26,6

0530

,566

30,3

6036

,065

34,7

3139

,089

38,9

7642

,992

42,0

1915

0

PR

16,6

52

15,6

52

18,6

17

17,6

63

19,2

65

17,6

07

19,6

92

18,7

43

20,9

76

19,6

52

28

U

p li

mit

12,7

1411

,213

13,7

1712

,077

13,1

8211

,359

12,8

1711

,522

13,4

2211

,838

-23

lo

wer

lim

it20

,589

20,0

9023

,517

23,2

4925

,348

23,8

5426

,567

25,9

6528

,531

27,4

6680

BA

3,6

00

3,3

56

3,4

43

3,8

14

3,8

65

3,8

46

4,0

61

4,2

39

4,2

76

4,3

88

36

U

p li

mit

4,18

74,

053

4,14

44,

583

4,74

64,

755

4,99

85,

242

5,32

65,

466

69

lo

wer

lim

it3,

012

2,65

82,

742

3,04

52,

984

2,93

63,

125

3,23

53,

225

3,31

13

MT

28,3

15

29,1

81

30,3

17

31,4

30

32,5

26

33,6

28

34,7

30

35,8

31

36,9

33

38,0

35

41

U

p li

mit

25,8

1225

,598

26,0

3226

,524

27,0

6527

,666

28,3

0528

,975

29,6

7130

,388

13

lo

wer

lim

it30

,818

32,7

6434

,601

36,3

3637

,987

39,5

9041

,155

42,6

8744

,195

45,6

8169

PR

16,1

55

14,8

55

17,4

42

16,5

34

17,9

82

17,5

38

19,1

66

18,6

53

20,0

45

19,7

56

34

U

p li

mit

13,7

6712

,113

14,5

4013

,588

14,9

2614

,454

15,9

9715

,441

16,7

9016

,475

12

lo

wer

lim

it18

,543

17,5

9720

,345

19,4

8021

,039

20,6

2222

,334

21,8

6523

,299

23,0

3756

RS

13,0

86

13,4

39

13,7

91

14,1

43

14,4

95

14,8

47

15,1

99

15,5

51

15,9

04

16,2

56

28

U

p li

mit

7,44

75,

463

4,02

32,

864

1,88

51,

033

279

--

--

lo

wer

lim

it18

,726

21,4

1423

,559

25,4

2227

,105

28,6

6130

,120

31,5

0232

,822

34,0

8916

8

PR

3,8

99

3,9

67

4,1

55

4,2

70

4,4

30

4,5

62

4,7

12

4,8

51

4,9

96

5,1

37

34

U

p li

mit

1,86

31,

494

1,37

41,

178

1,07

595

287

078

772

466

5-8

3

lo

wer

lim

it5,

935

6,44

06,

936

7,36

37,

786

8,17

38,

554

8,91

59,

269

9,61

015

1

RS

2,0

82

3,0

53

2,2

17

3,2

59

2,4

09

3,4

15

2,5

64

3,5

86

2,7

40

3,7

55

26

U

p li

mit

1,01

01,

835

779

1,79

670

41,

659

616

1,60

858

61,

569

-47

lo

wer

lim

it3,

155

4,27

03,

656

4,72

14,

115

5,17

04,

513

5,56

54,

894

5,94

199

RS

807

803

827

836

853

865

880

894

908

922

21

U

p li

mit

651

631

618

607

601

594

590

587

584

583

-23

lo

wer

lim

it96

497

61,

036

1,06

51,

105

1,13

71,

170

1,20

11,

232

1,26

266

Gra

pe -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Ric

e -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Wh

eat

- th

ou

san

d t

on

s

So

yb

ean

s -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Co

rn -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

Su

gar

Can

e -

th

ou

san

d t

on

s

3,8

25

2,9

79

760

8,4

34

16,8

39

15,2

95

3,2

29

27,0

02

14,7

41

12,7

34

69,3

07

76,7

41

19,1

53

49,2

27

404,6

80

6,9

57

Page 115: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Pro

ject

ion

s o

f P

lan

ted

Are

a –

Sel

ecte

d R

egio

ns

- 20

13/2

014

to

20

23/2

024

Pla

nte

d A

rea

20

13

/14

20

14

/15

20

15

/16

20

16

/17

20

17

/18

20

18

/19

20

19

/20

20

20

/21

20

21

/22

20

22

/23

20

23

/24

vari

ati

on

%

20

13

/14

to

2

02

3/2

4

RS

1,1

31

1,1

32

1,1

24

1,1

32

1,1

43

1,1

54

1,1

59

1,1

64

1,1

70

1,1

78

6

U

p li

mit

1,04

398

095

695

295

895

895

294

694

494

4-1

5

lo

wer

lim

it1,

218

1,28

31,

292

1,31

21,

327

1,35

01,

366

1,38

31,

397

1,41

327

GO

87

99

07

93

99

73

1,0

09

1,0

45

1,0

82

1,1

20

1,1

57

1,1

95

39

U

p li

mit

802

773

753

741

734

732

734

738

746

755

-12

lo

wer

lim

it95

71,

040

1,12

41,

205

1,28

31,

358

1,43

11,

501

1,56

91,

635

90

MG

99

81

,03

91

,07

71

,11

31

,14

81

,18

41

,21

81

,25

31

,28

81

,32

23

9

U

p li

mit

935

923

913

906

902

902

905

911

918

927

-3

lo

wer

lim

it1,

062

1,15

51,

240

1,32

01,

394

1,46

51,

532

1,59

61,

658

1,71

880

MT

29

13

01

31

13

22

33

23

42

35

23

63

37

33

83

37

U

p li

mit

262

260

261

264

267

271

276

281

286

292

4

lo

wer

lim

it32

034

236

238

039

741

342

944

546

047

569

PR

67

97

01

72

37

45

76

77

89

81

28

34

85

68

78

33

U

p li

mit

638

625

623

625

630

637

645

654

665

676

3

lo

wer

lim

it72

077

782

486

690

594

297

81,

013

1,04

71,

080

64

SP

5,3

43

5,1

37

5,5

46

5,4

86

5,9

10

5,8

12

6,2

13

6,1

05

6,5

01

6,3

95

27

U

p li

mit

5,01

04,

702

4,75

64,

608

4,89

44,

773

5,08

44,

955

5,26

05,

129

2

lo

wer

lim

it5,

676

5,57

36,

336

6,36

46,

925

6,85

17,

343

7,25

67,

743

7,66

152

MG

1,3

16

1,3

07

1,2

98

1,2

89

1,2

80

1,2

71

1,2

61

1,2

52

1,2

43

1,2

34

-7

U

p li

mit

1,18

71,

125

1,07

51,

031

992

955

921

888

857

827

-38

lo

wer

lim

it1,

445

1,48

91,

521

1,54

61,

568

1,58

61,

602

1,61

71,

630

1,64

124

MT

3,6

50

3,6

94

4,0

34

3,9

05

4,3

67

4,2

67

4,6

20

4,5

66

4,9

64

4,8

48

49

U

p li

mit

3,02

22,

975

2,95

72,

756

2,94

82,

787

2,91

82,

811

3,01

62,

855

-12

lo

wer

lim

it4,

278

4,41

25,

111

5,05

35,

786

5,74

76,

321

6,32

06,

912

6,84

211

1

PR

2,4

54

2,3

89

2,7

12

2,7

89

2,6

15

2,5

11

2,5

37

2,6

17

2,6

61

2,6

31

2

U

p li

mit

2,14

42,

069

2,37

72,

362

2,17

72,

030

2,04

62,

120

2,15

62,

125

-17

lo

wer

lim

it2,

763

2,70

93,

048

3,21

63,

053

2,99

33,

027

3,11

43,

166

3,13

722

BA

1,4

23

1,4

26

1,5

23

1,5

20

1,6

15

1,6

10

1,7

04

1,7

00

1,7

93

1,7

89

36

U

p li

mit

1,29

81,

288

1,31

81,

303

1,34

61,

332

1,38

31,

370

1,42

71,

415

8

lo

wer

lim

it1,

548

1,56

41,

728

1,73

71,

883

1,88

92,

025

2,02

92,

159

2,16

265

MT

9,3

45

9,5

52

9,8

78

10

,22

01

0,5

49

10

,87

91

1,2

11

11

,54

21

1,8

73

12

,20

44

2

U

p li

mit

8,51

08,

193

8,22

08,

307

8,40

78,

531

8,67

38,

828

8,99

49,

168

6

lo

wer

lim

it10

,179

10,9

1111

,536

12,1

3312

,691

13,2

2813

,748

14,2

5514

,751

15,2

3977

PR

5,1

24

5,2

85

5,4

65

5,6

19

5,7

53

5,9

15

6,0

71

6,2

21

6,3

70

6,5

27

30

U

p li

mit

4,78

34,

752

4,79

94,

824

4,83

84,

900

4,96

65,

029

5,09

85,

180

3

lo

wer

lim

it5,

464

5,81

76,

131

6,41

36,

668

6,93

07,

177

7,41

37,

643

7,87

357

RS

5,0

24

4,9

89

4,9

86

5,0

67

5,1

90

5,3

03

5,3

87

5,4

55

5,5

27

5,6

09

14

U

p li

mit

4,71

74,

380

4,17

94,

155

4,21

54,

270

4,28

64,

281

4,28

44,

304

-13

lo

wer

lim

it5,

330

5,59

85,

794

5,97

86,

165

6,33

66,

488

6,62

96,

770

6,91

440

PR

1,3

12

1,3

45

1,3

56

1,3

81

1,3

97

1,4

19

1,4

37

1,4

58

1,4

77

1,4

97

13

U

p li

mit

665

570

465

392

316

254

194

141

9144

-97

lo

wer

lim

it1,

958

2,11

92,

246

2,37

02,

478

2,58

32,

680

2,77

42,

863

2,94

912

3

RS

1,0

53

1,1

19

1,0

88

1,1

86

1,1

52

1,2

35

1,1

99

1,2

88

1,2

55

1,3

41

22

U

p li

mit

753

713

629

707

623

669

588

653

582

644

-42

lo

wer

lim

it1,

352

1,52

51,

547

1,66

51,

681

1,80

01,

810

1,92

31,

928

2,03

985

RS

51

51

52

52

53

53

54

54

55

56

11

U

p li

mit

4847

4645

4544

4444

4444

-13

lo

wer

lim

it53

5557

5961

6264

6566

6835

8,6

16

5,0

19

4,9

40

1,3

23

1,1

03

50

1,1

14

85

9

95

3

28

0

65

8

5,0

46

Su

gar

Can

e -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

So

yb

ean

s -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Wh

eat

- th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Gra

pe -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Co

rn -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

1,3

25

3,2

50

2,5

75

1,3

13

Ric

e -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Page 116: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

So

urc

e: A

GE

/Map

a a

nd

SG

E/E

mb

rap

a

Pla

nte

d A

rea

20

13

/14

20

14

/15

20

15

/16

20

16

/17

20

17

/18

20

18

/19

20

19

/20

20

20

/21

20

21

/22

20

22

/23

20

23

/24

vari

ati

on

%

20

13

/14

to

2

02

3/2

4

RS

1,1

31

1,1

32

1,1

24

1,1

32

1,1

43

1,1

54

1,1

59

1,1

64

1,1

70

1,1

78

6

U

p li

mit

1,04

398

095

695

295

895

895

294

694

494

4-1

5

lo

wer

lim

it1,

218

1,28

31,

292

1,31

21,

327

1,35

01,

366

1,38

31,

397

1,41

327

GO

87

99

07

93

99

73

1,0

09

1,0

45

1,0

82

1,1

20

1,1

57

1,1

95

39

U

p li

mit

802

773

753

741

734

732

734

738

746

755

-12

lo

wer

lim

it95

71,

040

1,12

41,

205

1,28

31,

358

1,43

11,

501

1,56

91,

635

90

MG

99

81

,03

91

,07

71

,11

31

,14

81

,18

41

,21

81

,25

31

,28

81

,32

23

9

U

p li

mit

935

923

913

906

902

902

905

911

918

927

-3

lo

wer

lim

it1,

062

1,15

51,

240

1,32

01,

394

1,46

51,

532

1,59

61,

658

1,71

880

MT

29

13

01

31

13

22

33

23

42

35

23

63

37

33

83

37

U

p li

mit

262

260

261

264

267

271

276

281

286

292

4

lo

wer

lim

it32

034

236

238

039

741

342

944

546

047

569

PR

67

97

01

72

37

45

76

77

89

81

28

34

85

68

78

33

U

p li

mit

638

625

623

625

630

637

645

654

665

676

3

lo

wer

lim

it72

077

782

486

690

594

297

81,

013

1,04

71,

080

64

SP

5,3

43

5,1

37

5,5

46

5,4

86

5,9

10

5,8

12

6,2

13

6,1

05

6,5

01

6,3

95

27

U

p li

mit

5,01

04,

702

4,75

64,

608

4,89

44,

773

5,08

44,

955

5,26

05,

129

2

lo

wer

lim

it5,

676

5,57

36,

336

6,36

46,

925

6,85

17,

343

7,25

67,

743

7,66

152

MG

1,3

16

1,3

07

1,2

98

1,2

89

1,2

80

1,2

71

1,2

61

1,2

52

1,2

43

1,2

34

-7

U

p li

mit

1,18

71,

125

1,07

51,

031

992

955

921

888

857

827

-38

lo

wer

lim

it1,

445

1,48

91,

521

1,54

61,

568

1,58

61,

602

1,61

71,

630

1,64

124

MT

3,6

50

3,6

94

4,0

34

3,9

05

4,3

67

4,2

67

4,6

20

4,5

66

4,9

64

4,8

48

49

U

p li

mit

3,02

22,

975

2,95

72,

756

2,94

82,

787

2,91

82,

811

3,01

62,

855

-12

lo

wer

lim

it4,

278

4,41

25,

111

5,05

35,

786

5,74

76,

321

6,32

06,

912

6,84

211

1

PR

2,4

54

2,3

89

2,7

12

2,7

89

2,6

15

2,5

11

2,5

37

2,6

17

2,6

61

2,6

31

2

U

p li

mit

2,14

42,

069

2,37

72,

362

2,17

72,

030

2,04

62,

120

2,15

62,

125

-17

lo

wer

lim

it2,

763

2,70

93,

048

3,21

63,

053

2,99

33,

027

3,11

43,

166

3,13

722

BA

1,4

23

1,4

26

1,5

23

1,5

20

1,6

15

1,6

10

1,7

04

1,7

00

1,7

93

1,7

89

36

U

p li

mit

1,29

81,

288

1,31

81,

303

1,34

61,

332

1,38

31,

370

1,42

71,

415

8

lo

wer

lim

it1,

548

1,56

41,

728

1,73

71,

883

1,88

92,

025

2,02

92,

159

2,16

265

MT

9,3

45

9,5

52

9,8

78

10

,22

01

0,5

49

10

,87

91

1,2

11

11

,54

21

1,8

73

12

,20

44

2

U

p li

mit

8,51

08,

193

8,22

08,

307

8,40

78,

531

8,67

38,

828

8,99

49,

168

6

lo

wer

lim

it10

,179

10,9

1111

,536

12,1

3312

,691

13,2

2813

,748

14,2

5514

,751

15,2

3977

PR

5,1

24

5,2

85

5,4

65

5,6

19

5,7

53

5,9

15

6,0

71

6,2

21

6,3

70

6,5

27

30

U

p li

mit

4,78

34,

752

4,79

94,

824

4,83

84,

900

4,96

65,

029

5,09

85,

180

3

lo

wer

lim

it5,

464

5,81

76,

131

6,41

36,

668

6,93

07,

177

7,41

37,

643

7,87

357

RS

5,0

24

4,9

89

4,9

86

5,0

67

5,1

90

5,3

03

5,3

87

5,4

55

5,5

27

5,6

09

14

U

p li

mit

4,71

74,

380

4,17

94,

155

4,21

54,

270

4,28

64,

281

4,28

44,

304

-13

lo

wer

lim

it5,

330

5,59

85,

794

5,97

86,

165

6,33

66,

488

6,62

96,

770

6,91

440

PR

1,3

12

1,3

45

1,3

56

1,3

81

1,3

97

1,4

19

1,4

37

1,4

58

1,4

77

1,4

97

13

U

p li

mit

665

570

465

392

316

254

194

141

9144

-97

lo

wer

lim

it1,

958

2,11

92,

246

2,37

02,

478

2,58

32,

680

2,77

42,

863

2,94

912

3

RS

1,0

53

1,1

19

1,0

88

1,1

86

1,1

52

1,2

35

1,1

99

1,2

88

1,2

55

1,3

41

22

U

p li

mit

753

713

629

707

623

669

588

653

582

644

-42

lo

wer

lim

it1,

352

1,52

51,

547

1,66

51,

681

1,80

01,

810

1,92

31,

928

2,03

985

RS

51

51

52

52

53

53

54

54

55

56

11

U

p li

mit

4847

4645

4544

4444

4444

-13

lo

wer

lim

it53

5557

5961

6264

6566

6835

8,6

16

5,0

19

4,9

40

1,3

23

1,1

03

50

1,1

14

85

9

95

3

28

0

65

8

5,0

46

Su

gar

Can

e -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

So

yb

ean

s -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Wh

eat

- th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Gra

pe -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Co

rn -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

1,3

25

3,2

50

2,5

75

1,3

13

Ric

e -

th

ou

san

d h

ect

are

s

Page 117: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Note

Page 118: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Note

Page 119: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira

Information Center0800 704 1995

www.agricultura.gov.br

Page 120: Brasília • DFglobaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/... · CEPLAC - Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - Empresa Brasileira